User talk:Bep

Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy

Hei Bep. Malen du bruker på bildene dine kan bli problematisk om disse retningslinjene blir vedtatt. Det kan derfor være fint om du deltar i diskusjonen. HilsenKjetil r 02:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denne diskusjonen er ikkje særleg viktig for meg. Eg forutset derimot at dei set i gang ein robot for å rydde opp i historikken, ei ukritisk sletting av bilete vil vere katastrofal. --Bep(talk)01:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, dette vil eventuelt bli gjort via robot hvis noen ønsker å gjøre om på malen din. Dette fører på ingen måte til sletting av bilder. --Kjetil_r 02:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although thefilemay be deleted, yourhard work(which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

NielsF^{?(en, nl, fr, it)}23:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikibar-alpha-8bit.png

Please tag your images

català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙italiano∙lietuvių∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙português∙polski∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙Tiếng Việt∙Ελληνικά∙македонски∙русский∙українська∙հայերեն∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Trung văn ( giản thể )∙Trung văn ( phồn thể )∙עברית∙فارسی∙+/−

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describewhat it is aboutin a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State theauthorand thedate of creation.If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user,link to the person's local user page.Best useCommonsHelper
If you did not create the file yourself, state thesourceyou got it from.
Add acopyright tag- images without an appropriate license tag will bedeleted.
Add the image to one or moregallery pagesand/orappropriatecategories,so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can useCommonsSense.

If you copied the filefrom another wiki,pleasecopy all informationgiven there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. UseCommonsHelper.

It is recommended to useTemplate:Informationto put that information on the description page. Have a look atTemplate talk:Informationfor details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text.Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to bedeleted.For more information, follow theCommons:First stepsguide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at theHelp desk.

Thank you.

This message wasadded automatically bySz-iwbot,if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot(talk)) or go to theCommons:Help desk.--Sz-iwbot(talk)01:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image TaggingImage:Khimaz.JPG

العربية∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙বাংলা∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)∙Ελληνικά∙English∙español∙euskara∙فارسی∙suomi∙français∙galego∙עברית∙hrvatski∙magyar∙հայերեն∙italiano∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙ಕನ್ನಡ∙한국어∙lietuvių∙latviešu∙македонски∙മലയാളം∙मराठी∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙norsk bokmål∙Plattdüütsch∙Nederlands∙norsk∙polski∙português∙română∙русский∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙српски / srpski∙svenska∙ไทย∙Türkçe∙українська∙اردو∙Tiếng Việt∙Trung văn ( giản thể )∙Trung văn ( phồn thể )∙+/−

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Khimaz.JPG.This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the givenlicense.Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an emailwith copy of a written permissiontoOTRS([email protected]).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.ShakataGaNai^{^_^}07:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not upload this picture. --Bep(talk)19:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans∙العربية∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)∙বাংলা∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)∙Ελληνικά∙English∙Esperanto∙español∙فارسی∙suomi∙français∙galego∙עברית∙magyar∙íslenska∙italiano∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙ქართული∙한국어∙македонски∙മലയാളം∙norsk bokmål∙Plattdüütsch∙Nederlands∙norsk∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙русский∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙српски / srpski∙svenska∙Türkçe∙українська∙Tiếng Việt∙Trung văn ( giản thể ) ‎∙Trung văn ( phồn thể ) ‎∙+/−

Hello, Bep!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add somecategoriesto describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1)If you're using theUploadWizard,you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2)You can also pick the file fromyour list of uploads,edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams"and"Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ( "Astronomical diagrams" ) over a generic one ( "Illustrations" ).

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found inCommons:Categories,and don't hesitate to leave a note onthe help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cannon on Akershus festning 0001.jpgis uncategorized since 20 March 2009.
Image:Telegraf-telefon-skilt.jpgis uncategorized since 20 March 2009.
Image:Oslo havn 0002.jpgis uncategorized since 20 March 2009.
Image:Warning sign 0002.jpgis uncategorized since 20 March 2009.
Image:Sogndal pano1.jpgis uncategorized since 29 March 2009.
Image:Phil Woods at Oslo Jazzfestival 1.jpgwas uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Street sign walker.jpgwas uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Building facade in Hegehaugsveien in Oslo.jpgwas uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
Image:Carl-Erik Torp - cardiac arrest during match.jpgwas uncategorized on 26 September 2011CategorizationBot(talk)11:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Disksusjon Alameda de pedra.jpgwas uncategorized on 24 October 2011CategorizationBot(talk)11:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred nobel statue oslo.jpg

Hei, denne er det vel Gustav Vigeland som står bak, så da må den slettes. Vi får gjenopprette 1. januar 2014!;-) Mvh.

User:Bep/license

Hi Bep, hope you don't mind that I formatted your above template. I wasn't quite sure about how to add{{Information}},but I think it would be helpful to use that one. -- User:Docuat11:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This template predates{{Information}},and was created at a time where image description pages had no structure at all. I can't really see how we can add{{Information}}to it without breaking it. On the other hand, I notice that Bep doesn't useUser:Bep/licensefor his latest uploads, so perhaps it is time to supersede it? I suggest that we change it to just "© 2005, 2006, 2007 byBjørn Erik Pedersen"and use it in the" author "field of{{Information}},and use separate license tags. Regards, --Kjetil_r 12:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something likethis versionshould do, but as his template only mentions ©, I'd prefer that he converts it himself.

I think there is also a bot that can substitute the template on the images afterwards (this would complete migrating "user:bep/license" to{{Information}}). -- User:Docuat14:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, that won't do, as{{Information}}often is used in combination withUser:Bep/license.Seethis example,we don't want two information templates on the same image page. I think a deprecation ofUser:Bep/licensemust be done by hand to catch all the ways it is used. --Kjetil_r 14:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You just made that one;). There seems to be some overlap[1],so yes, it needs some work. -- User:Docuat16:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into it... I started to use commonist for my uploads some time ago, so I stopped using the templates. --Bep(talk)17:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monolith_2_200804.jpg

File:Monolith_2_200804.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Wknight94 ^talk12:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monolith_1_200804.jpg

File:Monolith_1_200804.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Wknight94 ^talk12:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Bep,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, clickherefor more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us inthis survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered byLucia Botin20:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skreddergården

Hei! Veldig fine bilder du har tatt av Skreddergården i Akersgata! Jeg hadde tenkt å lage egen kategori for dem, men ble litt usikker da jeg så at du har lagt dem i kategorien for arkitekt Henrik Nissen. I siste Oslo byleksikon side 41 står det at Christian Reuter var arkitekten, det samme står det i artikkelen vår og hosSNLHar du noen opplysninger om Nissen du kan vise til eller er det feil? Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim(talk)19:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ser ut til at det er Reuter. Har opprettet kategori.;-) Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim(talk)08:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, fint du ordner opp. Jeg mener jeg fant arkitekten på en nowiki-artikkel... Men kan ha sett feil. --Bep(talk)21:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)∙English∙Esperanto∙español∙eesti∙français∙italiano∙മലയാളം∙Nederlands∙русский∙slovenčina∙српски (ћирилица)∙srpski (latinica)∙svenska∙Tagalog∙українська∙+/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Bep,
Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2012,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go tothe Wikipedia Welcome pagefor more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.Please fill in this short surveyin your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by theWiki Loves Monuments 2012notification system on 21:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registeredbefore Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000[UTC].
This user account must have more than75 editsonany singleWikimedia projectbefore Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000[UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at thePOTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account throughSUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go tothe POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round byJanuary 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered byOrbot1(talk) at08:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)- you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Grandiosa pizza.jpg

File:Grandiosa pizza.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Kelly(talk)16:44, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية∙català∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)∙English∙español∙eesti∙français∙galego∙magyar∙italiano∙Nederlands∙polski∙română∙svenska∙ไทย∙українська∙+/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Bep,
Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2013,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go tothe Wikipedia Welcome pagefor more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.Please fill in this short surveyin your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Bep,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in thequestionnaireyet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: thewinning picturesof this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Please add sources

Hi Bep: A while ago you uploaded great photos of the Opera house, however, quite a few of them are missing "source and author"... Could you take a look atthis page] start at "Opera" and fix the images for source and author? Thank you so much!Ellin Beltz(talk)21:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will, eventually. They are all mine, so author and source is me. --Bep(talk)14:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Vatnasete i Sogndalsdalen.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality. --Johann Jaritz 18:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Sogndal helsesenter 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality. --XRay 06:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Minnestein Hans Paludan Smith Schreuder.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Sau på Hylsete i Sogndal-2.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marrovi 00:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Eirik Bakke, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Ole Amund Sveen scora 2-2-målet mot Bodø-Glimt 24. juli 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it. Focus is exactly on the three acting players and the ball, no motion blur (1/1250). Good crop.

--QICbot(talk)05:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Boats in Port Vell in Barcelona.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a strnage shadow (see annotation) --Berthold Werner 16:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not donewithin a week. --XRay 17:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSensorfleck entfernt. Gruss --Nightflyer 20:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SupportIMO OK now. --XRay 05:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Nokkanes fyrlykt - Leikanger 2015.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality. IMO the categories could be improved. --XRay 05:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Nokkanes Leikanger 2015.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality. IMO the categories could be improved. --XRay 05:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Carvings in north wall portal, Urnes Stave Church-3.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness decreases a tiny bit toward the right edge but overall quality is good. --Renardo la vulpo 19:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Urnes Stave Church from north.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Dale kirke i Luster, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ElBute 10:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Skjolden bensinstasjon, original bensinpumpe 3.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Cool! Good quality. --W.carter 20:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Skjolden bensinstasjon, 2016, 7.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The wall looks overexposed, but it is actually not. Excellent detail. --W.carter 20:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Hopperstad stavkirke, 2016-2.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 17:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Baldersteinen, 2016 - 2.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI --A.Savin 11:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Hove kirke, inngang, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Hove kirke, 2016-7.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Despite everything, the shadow at the bottom actually works to set of the mountain at upper left. --W.carter 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Nes kirke, 2016-3.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Leikanger kirke, 2016-2.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Torre Agbar Barcelona 2015.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice colours, however I miss symmetry here --A.Savin 00:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Scofield-lovano.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Support--Christian Ferrer 06:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-8.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Just enough --A.Savin 00:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-7.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Henrik Krohn 1826-1879, gravstein i Sogndal.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentFor promotion, missing appropriateCOM:Categories--A.Savin10:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)SupportGood quality. I fixed the categories. --Yann 22:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Lonon Eye at sunrise.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Elisabeth Tower at sunrise, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!London Eye, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a lot of rather heavy purple fringes on the structure and the sky could use a denoising, think you could fix that?W.carter21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Should be better now. --Bep 00:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 15:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Big Ben at sunrise, 2016.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 16:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Sognefjorden sett frå Loftesnes, 2017.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Supportnice --Christian Ferrer 16:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]}The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]}The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information aboutthis project.This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by thisprivacy statement.Please visit ourfrequently asked questions pageto find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF)(talk)20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited.Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Kvammetunet, Sogn Folkemuseum-3.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, vivid colors. --Mooeena 01:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Lerum syltetøyfabrikk i Sogndal, 2017.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot(talk)05:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Sognefjorden sett frå Skjersnes.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC).The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey:You can find more information aboutthis project hereor you can read thefrequently asked questions.This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by thisprivacy statement.If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function toUser:EGalvez (WMF)or [email protected].About the Wikimedia Foundation:TheWikimedia Foundationsupports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF)(talk)07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!A roof of a building at the Grand Palace, Bangkok, sunrise, 2017.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Skilt, taxi.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments So, either the pole or the sign is level, you have chosen the sign which is fine by me. Good quality. --W.carter 08:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Picea abies shoot with buds, Sogndal, Norway.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps more DoF would be better but OK for me. Nice lighting, BTW. --Basotxerri 18:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Espen Næss Lund, Sogndal-Rosenborg 07-15-2017.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Hei! Biletet ditt av Fjærland kyrkje vann fyrsteplassen i Wiki Loves Monuments i Noreg i 2017! Gratulerer! Det har naturlegvis difor òg gått vidare til den internasjonale finalen i Wiki Loves Monuments, som eitt av dei ti beste bileta frå Noreg. Takk for bidraget!Astrid Carlsentek kontakt om premien snart!Jon Harald Søby (WMNO)(talk)12:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jippi! --Bep(talk)22:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hennes & Mauritz-butikk i Norge.jpg

File:Hennes & Mauritz-butikk i Norge.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

W3ird N3rd(talk)16:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018

Hei! Nå er detnestenså jeg gjentar meg selv her, hehe.Bildetdu tok av Kaupanger stavkirke vant fjerdeplass i årets WLM. Gratulerer! 🎉 I og med at bildene som kom på 1. og 2. plass er tatt av samme fotograf betyr det at det er du som vinner tredjepremien i konkurransen.Astridtar kontakt med deg om litt for å ordne med sending av premien. Gratulerer igjen!Jon Harald Søby (WMNO)(talk)18:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★This image has been promoted toFeatured picture!★

The imageFile:Kaupanger stavkyrkje 2018 take 3.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available atCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kaupanger stavkyrkje 2018 take 3.jpg.Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so atthis nomination page.

/FPCBot(talk)13:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weetabix Weetos i butikkhylle.jpg

File:Weetabix Weetos i butikkhylle.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Ə XPLICIT 09:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

DearBep,

Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2019,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go tothe Wikipedia Welcome pagefor more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.Please fill in this short survey,and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
theWiki Loves Monuments teamMediaWiki message delivery12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

DearBep,

Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2019,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go tothe Wikipedia Welcome pagefor more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.Please fill in this short survey,and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
theWiki Loves Monuments teamMediaWiki message delivery03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this attheir entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Affected:

File:Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church Glass Wall.jpg

Yours sincerely,Martin Sg.(talk)20:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this attheir entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

Affected:

File:Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church Glass Wall.jpg

Yours sincerely,Martin Sg.(talk)21:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!White wagtail in Norway.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments A title here in the nomination page is missing, otherwise good quality. --Cayambe 06:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Common chaffinch, male.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments
SupportGood quality. --ArildV 06:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bep,

Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2020,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey,and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
theWiki Loves Monuments team,08:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Daniel Eid-1.jpg

File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Daniel Eid-1.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

AntiCompositeNumber(talk)21:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File taggingFile:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Daniel Eid-1.jpg

العربية∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙বাংলা∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)∙Ελληνικά∙English∙español∙euskara∙فارسی∙suomi∙français∙galego∙עברית∙hrvatski∙magyar∙հայերեն∙italiano∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙ಕನ್ನಡ∙한국어∙lietuvių∙latviešu∙македонски∙മലയാളം∙मराठी∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙norsk bokmål∙Plattdüütsch∙Nederlands∙norsk∙polski∙português∙română∙русский∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙српски / srpski∙svenska∙ไทย∙Türkçe∙українська∙اردو∙Tiếng Việt∙Trung văn ( giản thể )∙Trung văn ( phồn thể )∙+/−

This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingFile:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Daniel Eid-1.jpg.This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the givenlicense.Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an emailwith copy of a written permissiontoVRT([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please seethis pagefor more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Missvain(talk)20:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Igoh Ogbu-1.jpg

File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Igoh Ogbu-1.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

AntiCompositeNumber(talk)00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Olav-stedje-2021.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice & good. --Selbymay 18:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations!Terje Tysland 2021-2.jpg,which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted toQuality Imagestatus.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so atQuality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization ofrecently promoted quality images.
Comments
SupportGood quality. --Ermell 19:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot(talk)05:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hammering Man i Lillestrøm.jpg

File:Hammering Man i Lillestrøm.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans∙Bahasa Indonesia∙Bahasa Melayu∙bosanski∙català∙čeština∙dansk∙Deutsch∙Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎∙eesti∙English∙español∙Esperanto∙français∙galego∙hrvatski∙íslenska∙italiano∙magyar∙Nederlands∙norsk bokmål∙norsk nynorsk∙occitan∙Plattdüütsch∙polski∙português∙português do Brasil∙română∙shqip∙sicilianu∙slovenčina∙slovenščina∙suomi∙svenska∙Tiếng Việt∙Türkçe∙Zazaki∙Ελληνικά∙беларуская∙беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎∙български∙македонски∙русский∙српски / srpski∙українська∙հայերեն∙বাংলা∙മലയാളം∙ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ∙မြန်မာဘာသာ∙ไทย∙조선말∙한국어∙Nhật bổn ngữ∙Giản thể trung văn ‎∙Phồn thể trung văn ‎∙עברית∙العربية∙پښتو∙فارسی∙ދިވެހިބަސް∙+/−

TommyG(talk)07:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Igoh Ogbu-1.jpg

Please stop removing the license statements fromFile:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Igoh Ogbu-1.jpg.The licensing of this file has been repeatedly discussed inCommons:Deletion requests/File:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Igoh Ogbu-1.jpg,and each time the consensus was that the license was valid.Commons:Deletion policydoes not make it clear how to appeal a decision to not delete a file, but if you think a mistake has been made you could discuss it with the admin who closed the deletion request, or alternatively raise it at theCommons:Village pump.Deleting license statements following decision to keep a file is disruptive and could lead to you being blocked from contributing to Commons.Verbcatcher(talk)21:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I followed your advice did not work, what do I dod? --Bep(talk)21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 i Norge

Hi there! I see that you have participated in the Norwegian part of Wiki Loves Monuments in previous years. Thank you very much! I'd like to inform you that the 2022 edition of the contest has just started, and I want to encourage you to participate this year as well!

Photos arenotrequired to have been taken this year – they can be from any time, as long as they are uploaded during October 2022. Maybe you have some more pictures from previous years that can be uploaded for this year's contest?

You can read more about it onthe contest page.Thanks, and good luck!Jon Harald Søby (WMNO)(talk)17:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bep,

Thank you for contributing toWiki Loves Monuments 2022,and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in yourupload log,and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short surveyand help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Categorization

HelloBep,this imageshould be categorized. Since you were the uploader, could you take a look at it? Thank you so much for your time.Lotje(talk)04:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited.Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Bep

Please tag your images

Image TaggingImage:Khimaz.JPG

Tip: Categorizing images

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Skreddergården

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Please add sources

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018

FP Promotion

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

File taggingFile:Sogndal-Raufoss 310720 Daniel Eid-1.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 i Norge

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Categorization

Navigation menu

Search