Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected fromCommons:FPC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media

Skip to current candidatesSkip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidatesare images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to becomefeatured pictures.The picture of the dayimages are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listedhere. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004,2005, 2006,2007,2008, 2009,2010,2011, 2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024andcurrent month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annualpicture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read thecomplete guidelinesbefore nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing– Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution– Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there arestrong mitigating reasons.This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. SeeCommons:Why we need high resolution mediafor more information.
  • Scans– While not official policy,Help:Scanningprovides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality– pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulationsmust not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the{{Retouched picture}}template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the{{Panorama}}or{{Focus stacked image}}templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fi xing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value–our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others.Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different fromothers,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right:Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit:Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit:Thehistorical methodvalues very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit:Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also bewell documented.An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we havefocus,exposure,composition,movement controlanddepth of field.

  • Focus– every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposurerefers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Compositionrefers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds"is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they" cut "the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background– foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement controlrefers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field(DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we haveshape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise,etc.

  • Shaperefers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volumerefers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Coloris important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texturerefers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspectiverefers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balancerefers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportionrefers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noiserefers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance…Opinion wars can begin here… A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations…

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read thecomplete guidelinesbefore nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. atCommons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair ofpendant paintings.Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description andlicensing,then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example,Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg.Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2afterthe filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created pageat the topofCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here,and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories:Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list atCommons FP galleries.Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example:Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sportsAn image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of theFeatured pictures categories.

Optional:if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note:Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selectingthebest image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} (Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Info),
  • {{Question}} (Question),
  • {{Request}} (Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, wherereasonexplains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, butany language may be used in your review.A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}} Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}} Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top ofCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template:{{Withdraw}}~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used byallWikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged{{FPX}}may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged{{FPD}}(FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become afeatured picturein compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriatelicense(of course)
  2. At least sevenSupportvotes (or 7Delistvotes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

TheFPCBothandles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, seeCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished.Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works consideredNot Safe for Work(nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the{{Nsfw}}template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with{{Nsfw}}on COM:FPC "to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations:purge this page's cache

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating, Nové Veselí

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Rock formations of Ustyurt plateau, Zhabayushkan sanctuary, Kazakhstan

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Río Ameca.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Río Ameca

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

Voting period ends on10 Nov 2024at02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Moving to where the grass is greener with archers defending livestock scene in Tassili n'ajjer park in Djanet in Algeria. The Scene is a bit funny especially with the dog sniffing the floor

File:Tagetes2.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

A photo of an orange Tagetes flower, slightly obscured by the surrounding dark green leaves

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph
Which categories should be fixed@A.Savin:?Charlesjsharp(talk)15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters.Charlesjsharp(talk)12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem asback in Jan 2020--A.Savin12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand.Charlesjsharp(talk)14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on9 Nov 2024at02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at21:22:09 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Camel, Bidiyah, Oman
Confirmed results:
Result:1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco(talk)12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

South aerial view of Admont, Austria

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Pumpkins, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Nautilus by Edward Weston

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Old woman walks with the cane through the flock of pigeons. Kaptarli mosque on the background. Yurmaduz mahalla, Margilan, Ferghana Region, Uzbekistan.

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on8 Nov 2024at02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on7 Nov 2024at12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Road R104 view with ubiquitous roadside argan tree in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Taj and people framed.jpg

Voting period ends on7 Nov 2024at10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal.

File:Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner, Portland (2024)-L1006267.jpg

Voting period ends on7 Nov 2024at04:21:53 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner in downtown Portland, Oregon, at night
Good catch,Yann!I've uploaded a new version in 16×10 ratio. @Radomianin,Sumit Surai:hope this works for you! Best, --Frank Schulenburg(talk)15:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportI would crop even more, but yes, definitely better.Yann(talk)16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Yann for the suggestion and Frank for the update. The new cropping has emphasized the striking impression of the photo. --Radomianin(talk)16:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is looking better.Sumit Surai(talk)14:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg

Voting period ends on7 Nov 2024at04:04:37 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

The Tomb of Hazrat Salim Chishti, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a mausoleum. It enshrines the burial place of the Sufi saint Salim Chisti, a descendant of Baba Farid, who lived in a cavern on the ridge at Sikri. Considered one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India, the mausoleum was built during the years 1580 and 1581 by Akbar, along with the imperial complex at Fatehpur Sikri near Zenana Rauza.

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg

Voting period ends on6 Nov 2024at15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman

File:Porkkali Theyyam.jpg

Voting period ends on6 Nov 2024at13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

All by --Shagil Kannur(talk)13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

Voting period ends on6 Nov 2024at11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط)

File:FlammarionWoodcut.jpg

Voting period ends on6 Nov 2024at09:40:32 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

The Flammarion engraving is a wood engraving by an unknown artist that first appeared in Camille Flammarion's L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire (1888). The image depicts a man crawling under the edge of the sky, depicted as if it were a solid hemisphere, to look at the mysterious Empyrean beyond. The caption translates to "A medieval missionary tells that he has found the point where heaven and Earth meet..."

File:1583 portrait of Sir Francis Drake.jpg

Voting period ends on6 Nov 2024at08:42:14 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

1583 portrait of Sir Francis Drake

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Vines on the wine island near Sommerach

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at21:00:52 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Carpenter working on a concrete formwork
Confirmed results:
Result:14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Radomianin(talk)21:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery:People#People at work

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at17:59:30 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Entrance area of the Union Bank Tower in downtown Portland, Oregon
Confirmed results:
Result:15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Radomianin(talk)21:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery:Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at14:10:21 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

British Army Westland WG-13 Lynx AH7 (ZX616) at RIAT 2024.
Confirmed results:
Result:16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Radomianin(talk)21:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery:Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at13:22:51 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Michlifen Dam, in the village of Bensmim, Ifrane Province, Morocco.
 Nomination denied.Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within theGuidelinesbecauseonly two active nominations per user are allowed.

Cmao20(talk)13:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result:1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Radomianin(talk)21:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on5 Nov 2024at13:16:46 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Ben Samim historic colonial clinic near the Moroccan city of Ifrane from the inside
 Nomination denied.Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within theGuidelinesbecauseonly two active nominations per user are allowed.

Cmao20(talk)13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result:1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Radomianin(talk)21:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on4 Nov 2024at21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.
Yes, it's in the originalEzarateesteban00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓Donethanks!!! --Ezarateesteban13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

Voting period ends on4 Nov 2024at19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Sculpture "Tetrahedron" (Bottrop, Germany) at night with light installation "Fraktal".
Addendum: This is arenomination.--A. Öztas11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. --A. Öztas11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do.Cmao20(talk)13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, seethis casefor example, a few days ago --Basile Morin(talk)05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominatedtwice?It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion --Basile Morin(talk)05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. --A. Öztas16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but stillthree oppose, one question and one comment during this short time.Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of courseAGF,but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, forassumedfair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case"Not voting also counts as a lack of interest".Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has beenrenamedtwicerecently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination"I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway",that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. --Basile Morin(talk)02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss about what? After the first answer fromyouandme,everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost Enigma tic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. --A. Öztas05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Invaluable also is novelty:-) --Basile Morin(talk)07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

Voting period ends on4 Nov 2024at09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

River Sil Canyon in Galicia, Spain.

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) on Tiritiri Matangi

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg(delist)

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at16:37:46
Austere medieval apse in Assisi

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Keir Hardie

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraout, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria
  • No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low.Poco a poco(talk)14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak opposeIn the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. --Radomianin(talk)15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addendum:If you look at theoriginal version,you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place aretouching templatewith the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, --Radomianin(talk)15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, --Radomianin(talk)21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

Voting period ends on3 Nov 2024at09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).

Alternate version (sharpness)

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).

File:Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg

Voting period ends on2 Nov 2024at12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike
  • Comment@GranadaI wanted to write at Info, actually what friend asked me "How many tries did i have?", he is profesional, i told 1/100, with new shoes 1/500. With Zuiko 50-200 mm + adapter, Single Focus maybe even less. Try it. Your sport shot are more by sharp angle, thats is easy shot. This angle is "worst" for photographer. That is big Wow for me...and obviously some profesionals too. --Mile(talk)10:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You're absolutely right, I take it the easy way. That's the reason I never get shots with a wow and never nominate at FPC.Granada(talk)14:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diver or chaman in Tin Tazarift.jpg

Voting period ends on2 Nov 2024at11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Diver or Chaman in Tin Tazarift in Tassili n'Ajjer in Djanet in Algeria. In fact there are tow interpretation to this frescos: one says it is about divers in water fishing and the archers and people around helping them, the other says that the horizontal men are chamans representing the link bitween this world and other dimensions and the archers are there to protect the ritual. I like too the level of water that erased some of the frescos and let one diver and part of the second diver: this gives an idea about the water level during rain period. I think it could be FP du to the complete scene in the frescos.

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767) - Red-base Jezebel (Male) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on2 Nov 2024at10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit thenomination pageto add or modifyimage notes.

Close wing moisture sucking of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767) - Red-base Jezebel (Male)


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Sun 27 Oct → Fri 01 Nov
Mon 28 Oct → Sat 02 Nov
Tue 29 Oct → Sun 03 Nov
Wed 30 Oct → Mon 04 Nov
Thu 31 Oct → Tue 05 Nov
Fri 01 Nov → Wed 06 Nov

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Wed 23 Oct → Fri 01 Nov
Thu 24 Oct → Sat 02 Nov
Fri 25 Oct → Sun 03 Nov
Sat 26 Oct → Mon 04 Nov
Sun 27 Oct → Tue 05 Nov
Mon 28 Oct → Wed 06 Nov
Tue 29 Oct → Thu 07 Nov
Wed 30 Oct → Fri 08 Nov
Thu 31 Oct → Sat 09 Nov
Fri 01 Nov → Sun 10 Nov

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. InCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate listclick on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=( "yes" or "no" )|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no" )|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example seeCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also{{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it isfeatured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery ofCommons:Featured pictures, listas the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section ofCommons:Featured pictures, list.Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in thegalleries.After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of theFeatured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use thesubpage/com-nomparameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to thechronological listof featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add== FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including{{FPX}}ed,{{FPD}}edandwithdrawnnominations), openCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list,click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom ofCommons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. InCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate listclick on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example seeCommons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template fromCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate listto the bottom of the actual month page onCommons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024.
  4. If the outcome wasnot delisted,stop here. If itis delisted:
    1. Remove the picture fromCommons:Featured pictures, listand any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, changefeatured=1tofeatured=2(do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example:Featured night photography,Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016,Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry inchronological listof featured pictures in bold-face, e. g.delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6)with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery isnotremoved.
  5. If this is aDelist and Replace,the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. InCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate listclick on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them inCategory:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure reviewjust like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. OpenCommons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list,click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom ofCommons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=884719385"