User talk:Fibonacci

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Licences

[edit]

Well... hello. I created an account here. But of course you already knew that, since you saw the images I uploaded:Image:Regular space.pngandImage:Normal space.png.And that's the reason for my message: why did you change the licence tags the images had? If you check, you'll notice those were the tags on the previous images,en:Image:Regular.gifanden:Image:Normalspace.gif(if they haven't yet been deleted). --Fibonacci01:02, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Fibonacci! If you check the history ofen:Image:Normalspace.gif,you'll see thaten:User:Toby Bartels,the author, didn't tag it as GFDL. And atImage:Normalspace.gifyou'll see he specified "No rights reserved". I happen to know from talking to him in the past that he means{{CopyrightedFreeUse}},and not{{PD}}.SeeImage talk:Separation axioms.pngfor a slightly related discussion.
Similarly, Toby wasn't the one who taggeden:Image:Regular.gifas PD.
Of course, it's a pretty academic difference.Dbenbenn01:57, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, I had not seen the histories of the images. --Fibonacci13:20, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi Fibonacci, I seem to have missed your message (had no notification). As far as I can remember some ofIvanrguezpictures were taken from spanish Websites and I could not read the copyright notice. But these seem to be deleted by now. Greetings -guety02:20, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do please checkoutCategory:RedundantReisio22:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge-to arrow

[edit]

I would like to useyour SVGto replacethe old GIFbut the background is not transparent. Would it be easy to fix? TIA HAND —Phil|Talk10:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would. Just stop using Internet Explorer. The background is already transparent, but IE won't show it correctly. --Fibonacci16:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uniform tiling images

[edit]

Hi, I appreciate the SVG replacements for my GIF images. I'm not sure how you do the conversion. I'm interested in showing the 32 uniform colorings for the 11 uniform tilings, and don't want to keep uploading inferior images. I'm wondering if you could help? I uploaded temporary image from a book, showing he 32 patterns. [1] 207.191.138.1400:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[2][reply]

Answered in your Wikipedia talk page. --Fibonacci02:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this image, because it is trademarked and has a restrictive use policy, seehttp:// ubuntu /ubuntu/TrademarkPolicy/- sorry about this. Note that trademarked logos are generally problematic - even if they belong to free software projects. Even the logos of the Wikimedia Foundation are (sadly) not free. --Duesentrieb(?!)08:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the file I uploaded was explicitly licensed under the GNU GPL? --Fibonacci15:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - with the strict trademark restrictions in place, the GPL is effectively worthles. The policy page i linked above forbids any modification, and als restricts use very much. Also note that often, the people that draw icons and release them under GPL don't really think about it - only the original designer of the logo has the right to do that. There are dozens of supposedly GPL icons of, say, the Acrobat logo - but those license claims are void if the original design is copyrighted. There's a strong bias against trademarked logos on commons.
It's ironic that many open source projects have non-free logos - either restricted by trademark, or directly using copyright (like wikimedia does). This appears to be the case because open content licenses don't directly address the case of logos - as they should, IMHO. Ideally, Logos would be free to use, except to express association or endorsement. That would be fine with me. But we sadly don't have that. --Duesentrieb(?!)18:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SothisPD claim is also void, and therefore, the image is not allowed here. Does it qualify for a speedy too? --Fibonacci21:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed - the creator of that logo doesn't have rights to the original design, so he can't make it PD. It's derivative work. That he doesn't claim copyright to his contribution does not help - in fact, it's a direct violation of the terms of use of the ubuntu trademark. I'm afraid we have a lot more of those "but i have drawn it myself" type of derivative work under false licenses... --Duesentrieb(?!)09:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any special template I should apply to those images so they can be deleted upon sight by an admin? Or should I list each one separately atCommons:Deletion requests?(you might want to check the images onUbuntu Linux- I think two of those are not allowed here and you could avoid them going through the lengthy deletion process). --Fibonacci09:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd tag them as{{Logo}}--Duesentrieb(?!)21:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You indicated on my talk page that this image was deleted. I don't recall having uploaded an image with this caption, however. If it was in fact mine, could you please let me know what it was and when it was uploaded. Just so I can be more careful in future. Many thanks. -Mu18:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. It must have been one of my first uploads. Since then, I've learnt to be more wary of wp:en:-) -Mu19:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Code optimizations

[edit]

Nice job.;)84.108.245.22210:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you! --Fibonacci10:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, that was me.Yonatantalk22:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scilab

[edit]

It was on polish wikipedia as FLOSS, so i tought that it's really free. I found on en.wiki that you've right. Thanks for information.Herr Kriss13:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for fi xing the svg code of myimage.This was first drawn in CorelDraw and then converted into svg and verified in Inkscape. Apparently Wikipedia software doesn't deal well enough with this format, whenever there are objects with holes in the picture files. Any suggestion on how to solve this problem in the future? Regards,Alvesgaspar20:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please clarify what kind of "holes" are you referring to? Sorry. --Fibonacci08:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think I need your help again. The svg version ofthis image(here) does not shown correctly. The origin of the problem is in the colored rings (the "holes" ), which are treated as filled circles by the wiki system, although everything seems correct in the svg application. Can you please help? I still do not know how to avoid the problem.Alvesgaspar22:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Khmer Rouge flag.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although thefilemay be deleted, yourhard work(which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

AfrikaansBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayubosanskicatalàčeštinadanskDeutschDeutsch (Sie-Form)‎eestiEnglishespañolEsperantofrançaisgalegohrvatskiíslenskaitalianomagyarNederlandsnorsk bokmålnorsk nynorskoccitanPlattdüütschpolskiportuguêsportuguês do BrasilromânăshqipsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinasuomisvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeZazakiΕλληνικάбеларускаябеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎българскимакедонскирусскийсрпски / srpskiукраїнськаհայերենবাংলাമലയാളംပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏမြန်မာဘာသာไทย조선말한국어Nhật Bản ngữGiản thể tiếng Trung ‎Phồn thể tiếng Trung ‎עבריתالعربيةپښتوفارسیދިވެހިބަސް+/−

--Soman09:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:World homosexuality laws.pnghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although thefilemay be deleted, yourhard work(which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

AfrikaansBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayubosanskicatalàčeštinadanskDeutschDeutsch (Sie-Form)‎eestiEnglishespañolEsperantofrançaisgalegohrvatskiíslenskaitalianomagyarNederlandsnorsk bokmålnorsk nynorskoccitanPlattdüütschpolskiportuguêsportuguês do BrasilromânăshqipsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinasuomisvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeZazakiΕλληνικάбеларускаябеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎българскимакедонскирусскийсрпски / srpskiукраїнськаհայերենবাংলাമലയാളംပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏမြန်မာဘာသာไทย조선말한국어Nhật Bản ngữGiản thể tiếng Trung ‎Phồn thể tiếng Trung ‎עבריתالعربيةپښتوفارسیދިވެހިބަސް+/−

--User:G.dallorto20:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than deletion, the image needs correction. Italy is completely wrong, but the thing can be fixed. I don't know where such a weird information comes from!. Could you please correct? Thank you.--User:G.dallorto20:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

[edit]

You just broke userboxes on the userpages of about 40 people with your use of the same filename for your new version of the radiation warning symbol (black symbol disappears into black background). The userbox isUser:Disavian/Userboxes/Nuclear EnergyJDG16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Radiation Warning Symbol

[edit]
new symbol

Hello Fibonacci, why do you haveremovedthe yellow background ofImage:Radiation warning symbol.svg?--Bangin@de@ku¤ρø$τ08:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربيةasturianuбеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎বাংলাcatalàčeštinadanskDeutschΕλληνικάEnglishespañoleuskaraفارسیsuomifrançaisgalegoעבריתhrvatskimagyaritalianoNhật Bản ngữ한국어македонскиമലയാളംnorsk bokmålPlattdüütschNederlandsnorsk nynorsknorskpolskiportuguêsportuguês do BrasilрусскийsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinasvenskaไทยTürkçeукраїнськаTiếng ViệtGiản thể tiếng Trung ‎Phồn thể tiếng Trung ‎+/−

Warning sign
This media may bedeleted.

Thanks for uploadingImage:Christianity.png.I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyrightstatus is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is aderivativeof a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plusCreative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike All-version license or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. SeeCommons:Copyright tagsfor the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion.If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using theGallerytool. Thank you.Lokal_Profil19:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert your change because the new version you uploaded was showing up as just a plain white ghost atw:User:AgnosticPreachersKid,w:User talk:Allstarechoandw:User:Allstarecho/gc.ALLSTARecho19:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just noticed that you had retouched my picture of a yellow passionfruit to make it sharper - in fact the original was taken under suboptimal lighting conditions.
However, the flesh of the fruit looks too dark in your version, almost to the point of resembling that of abanana passionfruit.Could you please modify it so that the flesh looks lighter? The other pictures in the article might give you a good indication of its true colour. Unfortunately I'm not skilled with the GIMP or Photoshop, so I cannot do the editing myself.

Thanks in advance. --Fibonacci(talk)04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. why not delete that picture, your new version is much better. Is there any reason to keep it? no matter how we try to fix it, it will never look ok.. --Finklez(talk)13:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get on this wiki much, so I didn't notice your edit until now, but I appreciate it! Those boxes were driving me absolutely batty.Octane(talk)21:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaansالعربيةбеларуская (тарашкевіца)বাংলাcatalàčeštinadanskDeutschDeutsch (Sie-Form)ΕλληνικάEnglishEsperantoespañolفارسیsuomifrançaisgalegoעבריתmagyaríslenskaitalianoNhật Bản ngữქართული한국어македонскиമലയാളംnorsk bokmålPlattdüütschNederlandsnorskpolskiportuguêsportuguês do Brasilromânăрусскийsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinaсрпски / srpskisvenskaTürkçeукраїнськаTiếng ViệtTiếng Trung ( giản thể ) ‎Tiếng Trung ( phồn thể ) ‎+/−


Hello, Fibonacci!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add somecategoriesto describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1)If you're using theUploadWizard,you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2)You can also pick the file fromyour list of uploads,edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams"and"Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ( "Astronomical diagrams" ) over a generic one ( "Illustrations" ).

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found inCommons:Categories,and don't hesitate to leave a note onthe help desk.

BotMultichillT13:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Fibonacci, I was looking through some math articles and noticed that your diagramFile:Conway's soldiers.svgbears a very strong resemblence to the diagram at[3].Although these are very simple diagrams, and strongly constrained by the problem under discussion, I'm concerned that the design choices borrowed here such as colors and line thickness rise above the threshold of originality, which would make this an illegal derivative work. Would you re-drawing this diagram in an original manner? Thank you.:-)Dcoetzee(talk)03:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mauritius flag

[edit]

there is a transparent line between each colour of the mauritius flag— Precedingunsignedcomment added by79.169.51.186(talkcontribs)

Gender

[edit]

Concerning thisFile:French country name genders.svg,that sounds good to me. Every country seems to be correct. Thank you for telling me about this, and you've done a great job. Regards. --Zorion(talk)07:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:COP1000_frente.jpghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn(talk)00:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free-speech-flag.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard(Hablemonos)(Let's talk)23:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi, I was planning on using one of your images,File:Catholic population.svgand was wondering what the source is for the information in the image. Thank you in advance,Taketa(talk)06:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blank_US_Map.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Foxnews(talk)16:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grammar_Nazi.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cuddlyable3(talk)22:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French country gender map

[edit]

Almost a year ago now, a user pointed out on the en:WP "Grammatical gender" article's Talk page (seehere) that there is a mistake in this map. The United Kingdom is called "le Royaume-Uni" in French, and is thereforemasculinein French, not feminine, as it is marked. While I realize that "la Grande-Bretagne" is a proper name for "Great Britain" in French, it actually is not a proper name for the whole country, as "Great Britain" does not include Northern Ireland, whereas "the United Kingdom" does. If you look atthis articleyou will see from the first paragraph alone that French is just as strict as English in making this distinction.

Since I haven't a clue how to edit svg files, do you think you could change that one country's colour to green to indicate the name's French gender?

There is another thing you might consider: The map hasn't been updated to show the South Sudan (masculine, of course).

Thanks.Kelisi from en:WPTalkKelisi(talk)02:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this attheir entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,Stefan4(talk)15:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated:File:Flag of La Cumbre (Valle).svg

[edit]
العربيةasturianuбеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎বাংলাcatalàčeštinadanskDeutschΕλληνικάEnglishespañoleuskaraفارسیsuomifrançaisgalegoעבריתhrvatskimagyaritalianoNhật Bản ngữ한국어македонскиമലയാളംnorsk bokmålPlattdüütschNederlandsnorsk nynorsknorskpolskiportuguêsportuguês do BrasilрусскийsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinasvenskaไทยTürkçeукраїнськаTiếng ViệtGiản thể tiếng Trung ‎Phồn thể tiếng Trung ‎+/−
Warning sign
This media may bedeleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons,File:Flag of La Cumbre (Valle).svg,is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify itscopyrightstatus. Pleaseedit the file descriptionand add the missing information, orthe file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter{{Own}}as the source. If you did not add alicensing template,you must add one. You may use, for example,{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}or{{Cc-zero}}to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it isbased on someone else's work,the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriatetemplateidentifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will beblocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and otherfiles you have uploadedbefore adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at thehelp desk.Thank you!

The Photographer(talk)08:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Villavicencio.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon(talk)15:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much

[edit]

Thank you for your past editing help at the imageFile:Sample 09-F9 protest art, Free Speech Flag by John Marcotte.svg.

It is now a Featured Picture at the English Wikipedia.

Thanks again,

--Cirt(talk)05:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Error in World map with 4 colours

[edit]

There is an error in the map with only 4 colours, because Azerbaijan and Turkey border each other and are both blue, so you need to colour Azerbaijan in blue and Georgia in yellow.Stigni(talk)07:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this attheir entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,seb26(talk)08:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated:File:Flag of Khabarovsk Krai.svg

[edit]
العربيةasturianuбеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎বাংলাcatalàčeštinadanskDeutschΕλληνικάEnglishespañoleuskaraفارسیsuomifrançaisgalegoעבריתhrvatskimagyaritalianoNhật Bản ngữ한국어македонскиമലയാളംnorsk bokmålPlattdüütschNederlandsnorsk nynorsknorskpolskiportuguêsportuguês do BrasilрусскийsicilianuslovenčinaslovenščinasvenskaไทยTürkçeукраїнськаTiếng ViệtGiản thể tiếng Trung ‎Phồn thể tiếng Trung ‎+/−
Warning sign
This media may bedeleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons,File:Flag of Khabarovsk Krai.svg,is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify itscopyrightstatus. Pleaseedit the file descriptionand add the missing information, orthe file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter{{Own}}as the source. If you did not add alicensing template,you must add one. You may use, for example,{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}or{{Cc-zero}}to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it isbased on someone else's work,the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriatetemplateidentifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will beblocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and otherfiles you have uploadedbefore adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at thehelp desk.Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, —JeffG. ツpleasepingortalk to me05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated:File:Group of Seven (G7) Countries.svg

[edit]
العربيةcatalàčeštinaDeutschEnglishespañolhrvatskiitalianoslovenščinaTiếng Việtбеларуская‎беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎русскийไทยမြန်မာဘာသာပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏNhật Bản ngữTiếng Trung ( giản thể ) ‎Tiếng Trung ( phồn thể ) ‎فارسی+/−
Warning sign
This file may bedeleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons,File:Group of Seven (G7) Countries.svg,is aderivative work,containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overallcopyrightstatus is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Pleaseedit the file descriptionand add the missing information, orthe file may be deleted.If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriatetemplateidentifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and otherfiles you have uploadedbefore adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at thehelp desk.Thank you!

Yann(talk)09:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queer Pagan Flag.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.160.0.9118:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnóstico.svghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.160.0.9118:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallae.pnghas been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this atits entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.161.174.21613:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hatching for Murrey and Sanguine

[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to ask for the source of the hatching schemes from the files you uploaded years ago. They are also present on Wikipedia as "present conventional system" but I couldn't find a source for it; I know that Fox-Davies hatches blood-red differently (as a mix of Gules and Purpure as opposed to Vert and Azure) and I couldn't find any example of Murrey being hatched at all (if I had to guess, I'd go with mi xing Sable and Purpure, akin to Brunâtre hatching being mixed Sable and Vert).

I'd be very grateful if you helped me with finding a source:) Best wishes, SMiki55(talk)20:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed atCommons:Deletion requestsso that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this attheir entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please seeCommons:But it's my own work!for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Aasim(talk)19:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]