William Byrd(/bɜːrd/;c. 1540– 4 July 1623) was anEnglish Renaissancecomposer. Considered among the greatest composers of the Renaissance, he had a profound influence on composers both from his native country and on theContinent.[1]He is often considered along withJohn DunstapleandHenry Purcellas one of England's most important composers ofearly music.[2]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53eaa/53eaaaea39c0d4a3bc702fc416d5e5d370a0244e" alt="etching of Byrd"
Byrd wrote in many of the forms current in England at the time, including various types of sacred and secularpolyphony,keyboard (the so-calledVirginalistschool), andconsortmusic. He produced sacred music forAnglicanservices, but during the 1570s became a Roman Catholic, and wrote Catholic sacred music later in his life.
Life
editBirth and background
editRichard Byrd ofIngatestone,Essex, the paternal grandfather of Thomas Byrd, probably moved toLondonin the 15th century. Thereafter succeeding generations of the Byrd family are described as gentlemen.[3]
William Byrd was probably born in London, the third surviving son of Thomas Byrd and his wife, Margery.[4][note 1]No record of his birth has survived,[5]and the year of his birth is not known for certain, but a document dated 2 October 1598, and written by William Byrd, states that he is "58 yeares or ther abouts", making the year he was born to be 1539 or 1540.[6]Byrd's will of November 1622 provides a later date for his birth, as in it Byrd states that he was then in the "80th year of mine age". The historian Kerry McCarthy has suggested that discrepancy over these dates may have been due to the will not being kept up to date over a period of several years.[7]
Byrd was born into a musical and relatively wealthy family.[8]He had two older brothers, Symond and John,[5]who became London merchants and active members of their respectivelivery companies.One of his four sisters, Barbara, was married to a maker of musical instruments who kept a shop; his three other sisters, Martha, Mary and Alice, were probably also married to merchants.[8][9]
Youth and early career
editDetails of Byrd's childhood are speculative.[8]There is no documentary evidence concerning Byrd's education or early musical training. His two brothers were choristers atSt. Paul's Cathedral,[5]and Byrd may have been a chorister there as well, although it is possible that he was a chorister with theChapel Royal.According to Anthony Wood, Byrd was "bred up to musick under Tho. Tallis",[10]and a reference in theCantiones sacrae,published by Byrd andThomas Tallisin 1575, tends to confirm that Byrd was a pupil of Tallis in the Chapel Royal.[11]If he was—and conclusive evidence has not emerged to verify it[12]—it seems likely that once Byrd's voice broke, the boy stayed on at the Chapel Royal as Tallis's assistant.[5]
Byrd produced student compositions, includingSermone Blandofor consort, and a "Miserere". Church music for the Catholic rite reintroduced by Mary would have been composed before her death in 1558, which occurred when Byrd was eighteen.[5]His early compositions suggest he was taughtpolyphonywhen a student.[13]
Lincoln
editByrd's first known professional employment was his appointment in 1563 as organist and master of the choristers atLincoln Cathedral.Residing at what is now 6 Minster Yard Lincoln, he remained in post until 1572.[14]His period at Lincoln was not entirely trouble-free, for on 19 November 1569 the Dean and Chapter cited him for 'certain matters alleged against him' as the result of which his salary was suspended. SincePuritanismwas influential at Lincoln, it is possible that the allegations were connected with over-elaborate choral polyphony or organ playing. A second directive, dated 29 November, issued detailed instructions regarding Byrd's use of the organ in the liturgy.[15]
On 14 September 1568, Byrd was married in the church of St Margaret-in-the-Close, Lincoln. His wife, Juliana, came from the Birley family ofLincolnshire.Thebaptismrecords mention two of their children, Christopher and Elizabeth,[16]but the marriage produced at least seven children.
The Chapel Royal
editIn 1572, following the death of the composerRobert Parsons,who drowned in theTrentnearNewarkon 25 January of that year, Byrd obtained the post of Gentleman of the Chapel Royal, the largest choir of its kind in England. The appointment, which was for life, came with a goodsalary.[17]Almost from the outset Byrd is named as 'organist', which however was not a designated post but an occupation for any Chapel Royal member capable of filling it.
Byrd's appointment at the Chapel Royal increased his opportunities to widen his scope as a composer and also to make contacts at the court ofQueen Elizabeth.The Queen was a moderate Protestant who eschewed the more extreme forms of Puritanism and retained a fondness for elaborate ritual, besides being a music lover and keyboard player herself. Byrd's output of Anglican church music (defined in the strictest sense as sacred music designed for performance in church) is small, but it stretches the limits of elaboration then regarded as acceptable by some reforming Protestants who regarded highly wrought music as a distraction from the Word of God.
In 1575 Byrd and Tallis were jointly granted amonopolyfor the printing of music and ruled music paper for 21 years, one of a number ofpatentsissued by the Crown for the printing of books, which was the first known issuing ofletters patent.[18]The two musicians used the services of the FrenchHuguenotprinterThomas Vautrollier,who had settled in England and previously produced an edition of a collection ofLassuschansons in London (Receuil du mellange,1570).
The two monopolists took advantage of the patent to produce a grandiose joint publication under the titleCantiones quae ab argumento sacrae vocantur.It was a collection of 34 Latinmotetsdedicated to the Queen herself, accompanied by elaborate prefatory matter including poems in Latinelegiacsby the schoolmasterRichard Mulcasterand the young courtierFerdinand Heybourne(aka Richardson). There are 17 motets each by Tallis and Byrd, one for each year of the Queen's reign.
TheCantioneswere a financial failure. In 1577 Byrd and Tallis were forced to petition Queen Elizabeth for financial help, pleading that the publication had "fallen oute to oure greate losse" and that Tallis was now "verie aged". They were subsequently granted the leasehold on various lands inEast Angliaand theWest Countryfor a period of 21 years.[19]
Catholicism
editFrom the early 1570s onwards Byrd became increasingly involved with Catholicism, which, as the scholarship of the last half-century has demonstrated, became a major factor in his personal and creative life. As John Harley has shown, it is probable that Byrd's parental family were Protestants, though whether by deeply felt conviction or nominal conformism is not clear. Byrd himself may have held Protestant beliefs in his youth, for a recently discovered fragment of a setting of an English translation ofMartin Luther's hymn "Erhalt uns, Herr, bei deinem Wort",which bears an attribution to" Birde "includes the line" From Turk and Pope defend us Lord ".[20]However, from the 1570s onwards he is found associating with known Catholics, including LordThomas Paget,to whom he wrote a petitionary letter on behalf of an unnamed friend in about 1573.[21]Byrd's wife Julian was first cited forrecusancy(refusing to attend Anglican services) atHarlingtoninMiddlesex,where the family then lived, in 1577. Byrd himself appears in the recusancy lists from 1584.[22]
His involvement with Catholicism took on a new dimension in the 1580s. FollowingPope Pius V'spapal bullRegnans in Excelsis,in 1570, which absolved Elizabeth's subjects from allegiance to her and effectively made her an outlaw in the eyes of the Catholic Church, Catholicism became increasingly identified with sedition in the eyes of the Tudor authorities. With the influx of missionary priests trained at theEnglish College, Douai(now in France but then part of the Spanish Netherlands), and in Rome from the 1570s onwards, relations between the authorities and the Catholic community took a further turn for the worse. Byrd himself is found in the company of prominent Catholics. In 1583 he got into serious trouble because of his association with Paget, who was suspected of involvement in theThrockmorton Plot,and for sending money to Catholics abroad. As a result of this, Byrd's membership of the Chapel Royal was apparently suspended for a time, restrictions were placed on his movements, and his house was placed on the search list. In 1586 he attended a gathering at a country house in the company of FatherHenry Garnett(later executed for complicity in theGunpowder Plot) and the Catholic poetRobert Southwell.[23]
Stondon Massey
editIn about 1594 Byrd's career entered a new phase. He was now in his early fifties, and seems to have gone into semi-retirement from the Chapel Royal. He moved with his family from Harlington toStondon Massey,a small village nearChipping Ongarin Essex.[24]His ownership of Stondon Place, where he lived for the rest of his life, was contested by Joanna Shelley, with whom he engaged in a legal dispute lasting about a decade and a half. The main reason for the move was apparently the proximity of Byrd's patronSir John Petre,son of SirWilliam Petre.A wealthy local landowner, Petre was a discreet Catholic who maintained two local manor houses,Ingatestone HallandThorndon Hall,the first of which still survives in a much-altered state (the latter has been rebuilt). Petre held clandestineMasscelebrations, with music provided by his servants, which were subject to the unwelcome attention of spies and paid informers working for the Crown.
Byrd's acquaintance with the Petre family extended back at least to 1581 (as his surviving autograph letter of that year shows)[25]and he spent two weeks at the Petre household over Christmas in 1589. He was ideally equipped to provide elaborate polyphony to adorn the music making at the Catholic country houses of the time. The ongoing adherence of Byrd and his family to Catholicism continued to cause him difficulties, though a surviving reference to a lost petition apparently written by Byrd toRobert Cecil, Earl of Salisburysometime between 1605 and 1612 suggests that he had been allowed to practise his religion under licence during the reign of Elizabeth.[26]Nevertheless, he regularly appeared in the quarterly local assizes and was reported to the archdeaconry court for non-attendance at the parish church. He was required to pay heavy fines for recusancy.
Anglican church music
editByrd's staunch adherence to Catholicism did not prevent him from contributing memorably to the repertory ofAnglican church music.Byrd's small output of church anthems ranges in style from relatively sober early examples (O Lord, make thy servant Elizabeth our queen(a6) andHow long shall mine enemies(a5) ) to other, evidently late works such asSing joyfully(a6) which is close in style to the English motets of Byrd's 1611 set, discussed below. Byrd also played a role in the emergence of the newverse anthem,which seems to have evolved in part from the practice of adding vocal refrains to consort songs. Byrd's four Anglican service settings range in style from the unpretentious Short Service, already discussed, to the magnificent so-called Great Service, a grandiose work which continues a tradition of opulent settings by Richard Farrant, William Mundy and Parsons. Byrd's setting is on a massive scale, requiring five-partDecaniandCantorisgroupings inantiphony,block homophony and five, six and eight-part counterpoint with verse (solo) sections for added variety. This service setting, which includes an organ part, must have been sung by the Chapel Royal Choir on major liturgical occasions in the early seventeenth century, though its limited circulation suggests that many other cathedral choirs must have found it beyond them. Nevertheless, the source material shows that it was sung inYork Minsteras well as Durham, Worcester and Cambridge, in the early seventeenth century. The Great Service was in existence by 1606 (the last copying date entered in the so-called Baldwin Commonplace Book) and may date back as far as the 1590s. Kerry McCarthy has pointed out that the York Minster manuscript of the Great Service was copied by a vicar-choral named John Todd, apparently between 1597 and 1599, and is described as 'Mr Byrd's new sute of service for means'.[27]This suggests the possibility that the work may have been Byrd's next compositional project after the three Mass settings.
Later years
editDuring his later years Byrd also added to his output of consort songs, a number of which were discovered byPhilip BrettandThurston Dartwhen Brett was a university student in the early 1960s.[28]They probably reflect Byrd's relationship with the Norfolk landowner and music-lover Sir Edward Paston (1550–1630) who may have written some of the poems. The songs include elegies for public figures such as theEarl of Essex(1601), the Catholic matriarch and viscountess MontagueMagdalen Dacre(With Lilies White,1608) andHenry Prince of Wales(1612). Others refer to local notabilities or incidents from the Norfolk area.
Byrd remained in Stondon Massey until his death, due to heart failure, on 4 July 1623, which was noted in the Chapel Royal Check Book in a unique entry describing him as "a Father of Musick". Despite repeated citations for recusancy and persistent heavy fines, he died a rich man[quantify],having rooms at the time of his death at the London home of the Earl of Worcester.
Music
editDuring his lifetime, Byrd published three volumes ofCantiones Sacrae(1575, co-written with Tallis; 1589; 1591), two volumes ofGradualia(1605; 1607),Psalmes, Sonets, and Songs of Sadnes and Pietie(1588),Songs of Sundrie Natures(1589), andPsalmes, Songs, and Sonnets(1611). He also composed other vocal and instrumental pieces; three Masses, music for theFitzwilliam Virginal Book,and motets.[29]
Early compositions
editOne of Byrd's earliest compositions was a collaboration with two Chapel Royal singing-men,John SheppardandWilliam Mundy,on a setting for four male voices of thepsalmIn exitu Israelfor the procession to the font in Easter week. It was probably composed near the end of the reign ofQueen Mary Tudor(1553–1558),[10]who revivedSarumliturgical practices.
A few other compositions by Byrd also probably date from his teenage years. These include his setting of the EasterresponsoryChristus resurgens(a4) which was not published until 1605, but which as part of the Sarum liturgy could also have been composed during Mary's reign, as well asAlleluia confitemini (a3)which combines two liturgical items for Easter week. Some of thehymnsandantiphonsfor keyboard and forconsortmay also date from this period, though it is also possible that the consort pieces may have been composed inLincolnfor the musical training of choirboys.
The 1560s were also important formative years for Byrd the composer. HisShort Service,an unpretentious setting of items for the AnglicanMatins,CommunionandEvensongservices, which seems to have been designed to comply with the Protestant reformers' demand for clear words and simple musical textures, may well have been composed during the Lincoln years. It is at any rate clear that Byrd was composing Anglican church music, for when he left Lincoln the Dean and Chapter continued to pay him at a reduced rate on condition that he would send the cathedral his compositions. Byrd had also taken serious strides with instrumental music. The sevenIn Nominesettings for consort (two a4 and five a5), at least one of the consortfantasias(NeighbourF1 a6) and a number of important keyboard works were apparently composed during the Lincoln years. The latter include theGround in Gamut(described as "Mr Byrd's old ground" ) by his future pupilThomas Tomkins,the A minor Fantasia, and probably the first of Byrd's great series of keyboardpavanesandgalliards,a composition which was transcribed by Byrd from an original for five-part consort. All these show Byrd gradually emerging as a major figure on the Elizabethan musical landscape.
Some sets of keyboard variations, such asThe Hunt's Upand the imperfectly preserved set onGypsies' Roundalso seem to be early works. As we have seen, Byrd had begun setting Latin liturgical texts as a teenager, and he seems to have continued to do so at Lincoln. Two exceptional large-scale psalmmotets,Ad Dominum cum tribularer(a8) andDomine quis habitabit(a9), are Byrd's contribution to a paraliturgical form cultivated byRobert Whiteand Parsons.De lamentatione,another early work, is a contribution to the Elizabethan practice of setting groups of verses from theLamentations of Jeremiah,following the format of theTenebraelessons sung in the Catholic rite during the last three days ofHoly Week.Other contributors in this form include Tallis, White, Parsons and theelder Ferrabosco.It is likely that this practice was an expression of Elizabethan Catholic nostalgia, as a number of the texts suggest.
Cantiones sacrae(1575)
editByrd's contributions to theCantionesare in various different styles, although his forceful musical personality is stamped on all of them. The inclusion ofLaudate pueri(a6) which proves to be an instrumental fantasia with words added after composition,[30]is one sign that Byrd had some difficulty in assembling enough material for the collection.Diliges Dominum(a8), which may also originally have been untexted, is an eight-in-four retrogradecanonof little musical interest. Also belonging to the more archaic stratum of motets isLibera me Domine(a5), acantus firmussetting of the ninth responsory at Matins for theOffice for the Dead,which takes its point of departure from the setting by Parsons, whileMiserere mihi(a6), a setting of aComplineantiphon often used by Tudor composers for didacticcantus firmusexercises, incorporates a four-in-two canon.Tribue Domine(a6) is a large-scale sectional composition setting from a medieval collection ofMeditationeswhich was commonly attributed toSt Augustine,[31]composed in a style which owes much to earlierTudorsettings ofvotiveantiphons as a mosaic of full and semichoir passages. Byrd sets it in three sections, each beginning with a semichoir passage in archaic style.
Byrd's contribution to theCantionesalso includes compositions in a more forward-looking manner which point the way to his motets of the 1580s. Some of them show the influence of the motets of Ferrabosco I, a Bolognese musician who worked in the Tudor court at intervals between 1562 and 1578.[32]Ferrabosco's motets provided direct models for Byrd'sEmendemus in melius(a5),O lux beata Trinitas(a6),Domine secundum actum meum(a6) andSiderum rector(a5) as well as a more generalised paradigm for whatJoseph Kermanhas called Byrd's 'affective-imitative' style, a method of setting pathetic texts in extended paragraphs based on subjects employing curving lines in fluid rhythm and contrapuntal techniques which Byrd learnt from his study of Ferrabosco.
Cantiones sacrae(1589 and 1591)
editByrd's commitment to the Catholic cause found expression in his motets, of which he composed about 50 between 1575 and 1591. While the texts of the motets included by Byrd and Tallis in the 1575Cantioneshave aHigh Anglicandoctrinal tone, scholars such as Joseph Kerman have detected a profound change of direction in the texts which Byrd set in the motets of the 1580s.[33]In particular there is a persistent emphasis on themes such as the persecution of the chosen people (Domine praestolamura5) theBabylonianorEgyptiancaptivity (Domine tu iurasti) and the long-awaited coming of deliverance (Laetentur caeli,Circumspice Jerusalem). This has led scholars from Kerman onwards to believe that Byrd was reinterpreting biblical and liturgical texts in a contemporary context and writing laments and petitions on behalf of the persecuted Catholic community, which seems to have adopted Byrd as a kind of 'house' composer. Some texts should probably be interpreted as warnings against spies (Vigilate, nescitis enim) or lying tongues (Quis est homo) or celebration of the memory of martyred priests (O quam gloriosum). Byrd's setting of the first four verses of Psalm 78 (Deus venerunt gentes) is widely believed to refer to the brutal execution of FrEdmund Campionin 1581 an event that caused widespread revulsion on the Continent as well as in England. Finally, and perhaps most remarkably, Byrd'sQuomodo cantabimusis the result of a motet exchange between Byrd andPhilippe de Monte,who was director of music toRudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor,inPrague.In 1583 De Monte sent Byrd his setting of verses 1–4 ofVulgatePsalm 136 (Super flumina Babylonis), including the pointed question "How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?" Byrd replied the following year with a setting of the defiant continuation, set, like de Monte's piece, in eight parts and incorporating a three-part canon by inversion.
Thirty-seven of Byrd's motets were published in two sets ofCantiones sacrae,which appeared in 1589 and 1591. Together with two sets of English songs, discussed below, these collections, dedicated to powerful Elizabethan lords (Edward Somerset, 4th Earl of WorcesterandJohn Lumley, 1st Baron Lumley), probably formed part of Byrd's campaign to re-establish himself in Court circles after the reverses of the 1580s. They may also reflect the fact that Byrd's fellow monopolist Tallis and his printer Thomas Vautrollier had died, thus creating a more propitious climate for publishing ventures. Since many of the motet texts of the 1589 and 1591 sets are pathetic in tone, it is not surprising that many of them continue and develop the 'affective-imitative' vein found in some motets from the 1570s, though in a more concise and concentrated form.Domine praestolamur(1589) is a good example of this style, laid out in imitative paragraphs based on subjects which characteristically emphasise the expressive minor second and minor sixth, with continuations which subsequently break off and are heard separately (another technique which Byrd had learnt from his study of Ferrabosco). Byrd evolved a special "cell" technique for setting the petitionary clauses such asmiserere meiorlibera nos Dominewhich form the focal point for a number of the texts. Particularly striking examples of these are the final section ofTribulatio proxima est(1589) and the multi-sectionalInfelix ego(1591), a large-scale motet which takes its point of departure fromTribue Domineof 1575.
There are also a number of compositions which do not conform to this stylistic pattern. They include three motets which employ the old-fashioned cantus firmus technique as well as the most famous item in the 1589 collection,Ne irascaris Domine.the second part of which is closely modelled onPhilip van Wilder's popularAspice Domine.A few motets, especially in the 1591 set, abandon traditional motet style and resort to vividword paintingwhich reflects the growing popularity of themadrigal(Haec dies,Laudibus in sanctis,1591). A famous passage fromThomas Morley'sA Plaine and Easie Introduction to Practicall Musicke(1597) supports the view that the madrigal had superseded the motet in the favour of Catholic patrons, a fact which may explain why Byrd composed few non-liturgical motets after 1591.
The English song-books of 1588 and 1589
editIn 1588 and 1589 Byrd also published two collections of English songs.[34]The first,Psalms, Sonnets and Songs of Sadness and Pietie(1588), contains the firstmadrigalspublished in England.[35]It consists mainly of adaptedconsort songs,which Byrd, probably guided by commercial instincts, had turned into vocal part-songs by adding words to the accompanying instrumental parts and labelling the original solo voice as "the first singing part". The consort song, which was the most popular form of vernacular polyphony in England in the third quarter of the sixteenth century, was a solo song for a high voice (often sung by a boy) accompanied by a consort of four consort instruments (normally viols). As the title of Byrd's collection implies, consort songs varied widely in character. Many were settings of metrical psalms, in which the solo voice sings a melody in the manner of the numerous metrical psalm collections of the day (e.g.Sternhold and Hopkins Psalter,1562) with each line prefigured by imitation in the accompanying instruments. Others are dramatic elegies, intended to be performed in theboy-playswhich were popular in Tudor London. A popular source for song settings was Richard Edwards'The paradyse of dainty devices(1576) of which seven settings in consort song form survive.
Byrd's 1588 collection, which complicates the form as he inherited it from Parsons,Richard Farrantand others, reflects this tradition. The "psalms" section sets texts drawn from Sternhold's psalter of 1549 in the traditional manner, while the 'sonnets and pastorals' section employs lighter, more rapid motion with crotchet (quarter-note) pulse, and sometimes triple metre (Though Amaryllis dance in green, If women could be fair). Poetically, the set (together with other evidence) reflects Byrd's involvement with the literary circle surroundingSir Philip Sidney,whose influence at Court was at its height in the early 1580s. Byrd set three of the songs from Sidney'ssonnetsequenceAstrophel and Stella,as well as poems by other members of the Sidney circle, and also included two elegies on Sidney's death in theBattle of Zutphenin 1586.[36]But the most popular item in the set was theLullaby(Lullay lullaby) which blends the tradition of the dramatic lament with the cradle-songs found in some early boy-plays and medievalmystery plays.It long retained its popularity. In 1602, Byrd's patron Edward Somerset, 4th Earl of Worcester, discussing Court fashions in music, predicted that "in winter lullaby, an owld song of Mr Birde, wylbee more in request as I thinke."
TheSongs of Sundrie Natures(1589) contain sections in three, four, five and six parts, a format which follows the plan of many Tudor manuscript collections of household music and was probably intended to emulate the madrigal collectionMusica transalpina,which had appeared in print the previous year. Byrd's set contains compositions in a wide variety of musical styles, reflecting the variegated character of the texts which he was setting. The three-part section includes settings of metrical versions of the sevenpenitential psalms,in an archaic style which reflects the influence of the psalm collections. Other items from the three-part and four-part section are in a lighter vein, employing a line-by-line imitative technique and a predominant crotchet pulse (The nightingale so pleasant (a3), Is love a boy? (a4)). The five-part section includes vocal part-songs which show the influence of the "adapted consort song" style of the 1588 set but which seem to have been conceived as all-vocal part-songs. Byrd also bowed to tradition by setting two carols in the traditional form with alternating verses and burdens, (From Virgin's womb this day did spring, An earthly tree, a heavenly fruit, both a6) and even included ananthem,a setting of the Easter proseChrist rising againwhich also circulated in church choir manuscripts with organ accompaniment.
My Ladye Nevells Booke
editThe 1580s were also a productive decade for Byrd as a composer of instrumental music. On 11 September 1591John Baldwin,a tenor lay-clerk atSt George's Chapel, Windsorand later a colleague of Byrd in the Chapel Royal, completed the copying ofMy Ladye Nevells Booke,a collection of 42 of Byrd's keyboard pieces, which was probably produced under Byrd's supervision and includes corrections which are thought to be in the composer's hand. Byrd would almost certainly have published it if the technical means had been available to do so. The dedicatee long remained unidentified, but John Harley's researches into the heraldic design on the fly-leaf have shown that she wasLady Elizabeth Neville,the third wife of SirHenry Nevilleof Billingbear House, Berkshire, who was ajustice of the peaceand a warden ofWindsor Great Park.[37]Under her third married name, Lady Periam, she also received the dedication of Thomas Morley's two-partcanzonetsof 1595. The contents show Byrd's mastery of a wide variety of keyboard forms, though liturgical compositions based on plainsong are not represented. The collection includes a series of ten pavans and galliards in the usual three-strain form with embellished repeats of each strain. (The only exception is the Ninth Pavan, which is a set of variations on thepassamezzo anticobass.)
There are indications that the sequence may be a chronological one, for the First Pavan is labelled "the first that ever hee made" in theFitzwilliam Virginal Book,and the Tenth Pavan, which is separated from the others, evidently became available at a late stage before the completion date. It is dedicated toWilliam Petre(the son of Byrd's patron SirJohn Petre, 1st Baron Petre) who was only 15 years old in 1591 and could hardly have played it if it had been composed much earlier. The collection also includes two famous pieces of programme music.The Battle,which was apparently inspired by an unidentified skirmish in Elizabeth's Irish wars, is a sequence of movements bearing titles such as "The marche to fight", "The battells be joyned" and "The Galliarde for the victorie". Although not representing Byrd at his most profound, it achieved great popularity and is of incidental interest for the information which it gives on sixteenth-century English military calls. It is followed byThe Barley Break(a mock-battle follows a real one), a light-hearted piece which follows the progress of a game of "barley-break", a version of the game now known as "piggy in the middle", played by three couples with a ball.My Ladye Nevells Bookealso contains two monumentalGrounds,and sets of keyboard variations of variegated character, notably the huge set onWalsinghamand the popular variations onSellinger's Round,Carman's WhistleandMy Lord Willoughby's Welcome Home.The fantasias and voluntaries in Nevell also cover a wide stylistic range, some being austerely contrapuntal (A voluntarie,no. 42) and others lighter and more Italianate in tone. (A Fancieno 36). Like the five-and six-part consort fantasias, they sometimes feature a gradual increase in momentum after an imitative opening paragraph.
Consort music
editThe period up to 1591 also saw important additions to Byrd's output of consort music, some of which have probably been lost. Two magnificent large-scale compositions are theBrowning,a set of 20 variations on a popular melody (also known as "The leaves be green" ) which evidently originated as a celebration of the ripening of nuts in autumn, and an elaborate ground on the formula known as theGoodnight Ground.The smaller-scale fantasias (those a3 and a4) use a light-textured imitative style which owes something to Continental models, while the five and six-part fantasias employ large-scale cumulative construction and allusions to snatches of popular songs. A good example of the last type is theFantasia a6 (No 2)which begins with a sober imitative paragraph before progressively more fragmented textures (working in a quotation fromGreensleevesat one point). It even includes a complete three-strain galliard, followed by an expansive coda (for a performance on YouTube, see under 'External links' below). The single five-part fantasia, which is apparently an early work, includes a canon at the upper fourth.[citation needed]
Masses
editByrd now embarked on a programme to provide a cycle of liturgical music covering all the principal feasts of the Catholic Church calendar. The first stage in this undertaking comprised the threeOrdinary of the Masscycles (in four, three andfiveparts), which were published byThomas Eastbetween 1592 and 1595. The editions are undated (dates can be established only by close bibliographic analysis),[38]do not name the printer and consist of only one bifolium per partbook to aid concealment, reminders that the possession of heterodox books was still highly dangerous. All three works contain retrospective features harking back to the earlier Tudor tradition of Mass settings which had lapsed after 1558, along with others which reflect Continental influence and the liturgical practices of the foreign-trained incoming missionary priests.Mass for Four Voices,or the Four-Part Mass, which according to Joseph Kerman was probably the first to be composed, is partly modelled onJohn Taverner'sMean Mass,a highly regarded early Tudor setting which Byrd would probably have sung as a choirboy. Taverner's influence is particularly clear in the scale figures rising successively through a fifth, a sixth and a seventh in Byrd's setting of theSanctus.
All three Mass cycles employ other early Tudor features, notably the mosaic of semichoir sections alternating with full sections in the four-part and five-part Masses, the use of a semichoir section to open theGloria,Credo,andAgnus Dei,and thehead-motifwhich links the openings of all the movements of a cycle. However, all three cycles also includeKyries, a rare feature in Sarum Rite Mass settings, which usually omitted it because of the use of tropes on festal occasions in the Sarum Rite. TheKyrieof the three-part Mass is set in a simplelitany-like style, but the otherKyriesettings employ dense imitative polyphony. A special feature of the four-part and five-part Masses is Byrd's treatment of theAgnus Dei,which employ the technique which Byrd had previously applied to the petitionary clauses from the motets of the 1589 and 1591Cantiones sacrae.The final wordsdona nobis pacem( "grant us peace" ), which are set to chains of anguished suspensions in the Four-Part Mass and expressive blockhomophonyin the five-part setting, almost certainly reflect the aspirations of the troubled Catholic community of the 1590s.
Gradualia
editThe second stage in Byrd's programme of liturgical polyphony is formed by theGradualia,two cycles of motets containing 109 items and published in 1605 and 1607. They are dedicated to two members of the Catholic nobility,Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northamptonand Byrd's own patron Sir John Petre, who had been elevated to the peerage in 1603 under the title Lord Petre of Writtle. The appearance of these two monumental collections of Catholic polyphony reflects the hopes which the recusant community must have harboured for an easier life under the new kingJames I,whose mother,Mary Queen of Scots,had been a Catholic. Addressing Petre (who is known to have lent him money to advance the printing of the collection), Byrd describes the contents of the 1607 set as "blooms collected in your own garden and rightfully due to you as tithes", thus making explicit the fact that they had formed part of Catholic religious observances in the Petre household.
The greater part of the two collections consists of settings of theProprium Missaefor the major feasts of thechurch calendar,thus supplementing the Mass Ordinary cycles which Byrd had published in the 1590s. Normally, Byrd includes theIntroit,theGradual,theAlleluia(orTractin Lent if needed), theOffertoryand Communion. The feasts covered include the major feasts of theVirgin Mary(including thevotive massesfor the Virgin for the four seasons of the church year),All SaintsandCorpus Christi(1605) followed by the feasts of theTemporale(Christmas,Epiphany,Easter,Ascension,Whitsun,andFeast of Saints Peter and Paul(with additional items forSt Peter's Chainsand theVotive Mass of the Blessed Sacrament) in 1607. The verse of theIntroitis normally set as a semichoir section, returning to full choir scoring for theGloria Patri.Similar treatment applies to the Gradual verse, which is normally attached to the openingAlleluiato form a single item. The liturgy requires repeated settings of the word "Alleluia",and Byrd provides a wide variety of different settings forming brilliantly conceived miniature fantasias which are one of the most striking features of the two sets. TheAlleluiaverse, together with the closingAlleluia,normally form an item in themselves, while the Offertory and the Communion are set as they stand.
In theRoman liturgythere are many texts which appear repeatedly in different liturgical contexts. To avoid having to set the same text twice, Byrd often resorted to a cross-reference or "transfer" system which allowed a single setting to be slotted into a different place in the liturgy. This practice sometimes causes confusion, partly because normally norubricsare printed to make the required transfer clear and partly because there are some errors which complicate matters still further. A good example of the transfer system in operation is provided by the first motet from the 1605 set (Suscepimus Deusa5) in which the text used for theIntroithas to be reused in a shortened form for the Gradual. Byrd provides a cadential break at the cut-off point.
The 1605 set also contains a number of miscellaneous items which fall outside the liturgical scheme of the main body of the set. AsPhilip Bretthas pointed out, most of the items from the four- and three-part sections were taken from the Primer (the English name for theBook of hours), thus falling within the sphere of private devotions rather than public worship. These include,inter alia,settings of the fourMarian antiphonsfrom theRoman Rite,four Marian hymns set a3, a version of the Litany, the gem-like setting of the Eucharistic hymnAve verum Corpus,and theTurbarum vocesfrom theSt John Passion,as well as a series of miscellaneous items.
In stylistic terms the motets of theGradualiaform a sharp contrast to those of theCantiones sacraepublications. The vast majority are shorter, with the discursive imitative paragraphs of the earlier motets giving place to double phrases in which the counterpoint, though intricate and concentrated, assumes a secondary level of importance. Long imitative paragraphs are the exception, often kept for final climactic sections in the minority of extended motets. The melodic writing often breaks into quaver (eighth-note) motion, tending to undermine the minim (half-note) pulse with surface detail. Some of the more festive items, especially in the 1607 set, feature vivid madrigalesque word-painting. The Marian hymns from the 1605Gradualiaare set in a light line-by-line imitative counterpoint with crotchet pulse which recalls the three-part English songs from Songs of sundrie natures (1589). For obvious reasons, theGradualianever achieved the popularity of Byrd's earlier works. The 1607 set omits several texts, which were evidently too sensitive for publication in the light of the renewed anti-Catholic persecution which followed the failure of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605. A contemporary account which sheds light on the circulation of the music between Catholic country houses, refers to the arrest of a young Frenchman named Charles de Ligny, who was followed from an unidentified country house by spies, apprehended, searched and found to be carrying a copy of the 1605 set.[39]Nevertheless, Byrd felt safe enough to reissue both sets with new title pages in 1610
Psalms, songs and sonnets (1611)
editByrd's last collection of English songs wasPsalms, Songs and Sonnets,published in 1611 (when Byrd was over 70) and dedicated toFrancis Clifford, 4th Earl of Cumberland,who later also received the dedication ofThomas Campion'sFirst Book of Songsin about 1613. The layout of the set broadly follows the pattern of Byrd's 1589 set, being laid out in sections for three, four, five and six parts like its predecessor and embracing an even wider miscellany of styles (perhaps reflecting the influence of anotherJacobeanpublication,Michael East'sThird Set of Books(1610)). Byrd's set includes two consort fantasias (a4 and a6) as well as eleven English motets, most of them setting prose texts from the Bible. These include some of his most famous compositions, notablyPraise our Lord, all ye Gentiles(a6),This day Christ was born(a6) andHave mercy upon me(a6), which employs alternating phrases with verse and full scoring and was circulated as a church anthem. There are more carols set in verse and burden form as in the 1589 set as well as lighter three- and four-part songs in Byrd's "sonnets and pastorals" style. Some items are, however, more tinged with madrigalian influence than their counterparts in the earlier set, making clear that the short-lived madrigal vogue of the 1590s had not completely passed Byrd by. Many of the songs follow, and develop further, types already established in the 1589 collection.
Last works
editByrd also contributed eight keyboard pieces toParthenia(winter 1612–13), a collection of 21 keyboard pieces engraved byWilliam Hole,and containing music by Byrd,John BullandOrlando Gibbons.It was issued in celebration of the forthcoming marriage of James I's daughterPrincess ElizabethtoFrederick V, Elector Palatine,which took place on 14 February 1613. The three composers are nicely differentiated by seniority, with Byrd, Bull and Gibbons represented respectively by eight, seven and six items. Byrd's contribution includes the famousEarle of Salisbury Pavan,composed in memory ofRobert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury,who had died on 24 May 1612, and its two accompanying galliards. Byrd's last published compositions are four English anthems printed in SirWilliam Leighton'sTeares or Lamentacions of a Sorrowfull Soule(1614).
Legacy
editByrd's output of about 470 compositions amply justifies his reputation as one of the great masters of European Renaissance music. Perhaps his most impressive achievement as a composer was his ability to transform so many of the main musical forms of his day and stamp them with his own identity. Having grown up in an age in which Latin polyphony was largely confined to liturgical items for the Sarum rite, he assimilated and mastered the Continental motet form of his day, employing a highly personal synthesis of English and continental models. He virtually created the Tudor consort and keyboard fantasia, having only the most primitive models to follow. He also raised the consort song, the church anthem and the Anglican service setting to new heights. Finally, despite a general aversion to the madrigal, he succeeded in cultivating secular vocal music in an impressive variety of forms in his three sets of 1588, 1589 and 1611.
Byrd enjoyed a high reputation among English musicians. As early as 1575 Richard Mulcaster and Ferdinand Haybourne praised Byrd, together with Tallis, in poems published in the Tallis/ByrdCantiones.Despite the financial failure of the publication, some of his other collections sold well, while Elizabethan scribes such as theOxfordacademicRobert Dow,Baldwin, and a school of scribes working for the Norfolk country gentlemanSir Edward Pastoncopied his music extensively. Dow included Latindistichsand quotations in praise of Byrd in his manuscript collection of music, theDow Partbooks(GB Och 984–988), while Baldwin included a long doggerel poem in his Commonplace Book (GB Lbm Roy App 24 d 2) ranking Byrd at the head of the musicians of his day:
- Yet let not straingers bragg, nor they these soe commende,
- For they may now geve place and sett themselves behynde,
- An Englishman, by name, William BIRDE for his skill
- Which I shoulde heve sett first, for soe it was my will,
- Whose greater skill and knowledge dothe excelle all at this time
- And far to strange countries abrode his skill dothe shyne...[40]
In 1597 Byrd's pupil Thomas Morley dedicated his treatiseA Plaine and Easie Introduction to Practicall Musicketo Byrd in flattering terms, though he may have intended to counterbalance this in the main text by some sharply satirical references to a mysterious "Master Bold". InThe Compleat Gentleman(1622)Henry Peacham(1576–1643) praised Byrd in lavish terms as a composer of sacred music:
- "For Motets and musick of piety and devotion, as well as for the honour of our Nation, as the merit of the man, I prefer above all our Phoenix M[aster] William Byrd, whom in that kind, I know not whether any may equall, I am sure none excel, even by the judgement of France and Italy, who are very sparing in the commendation of strangers, in regard of that conceipt they hold of themselves. His Cantiones Sacrae, as also his Gradualia, are mere Angelicall and Divine; and being of himself naturally disposed to Gravity and Piety, his vein is not so much for leight Madrigals or Canzonets, yet his Virginella and some others in his first Set, cannot be mended by the best Italian of them all."[41]
Finally, and most intriguingly, it has been suggested that a reference to "the bird of loudest lay" inShakespeare's mysterious allegorical poemThe Phoenix and the Turtlemay be to the composer. The poem as a whole has been interpreted as an elegy for the Catholic martyr StAnne Line,who was executed at Tyburn on 27 February 1601 for harbouring priests.[42]
Byrd was an active and influential teacher. As well as Morley, his pupils includedPeter Philips,Tomkins and probablyThomas Weelkes,the first two of whom were important contributors to the Elizabethan and Jacobean virginalist school. However, by the time Byrd died in 1623 the English musical landscape was undergoing profound changes. The principal virginalist composers died off in the 1620s (except forGiles Farnaby,who died in 1640, and Thomas Tomkins, who lived on until 1656) and found no real successors. Thomas Morley, Byrd's other major composing pupil, devoted himself to the cultivation of the madrigal, a form in which Byrd himself took little interest. The native tradition of Latin music which Byrd had done so much to keep alive more or less died with him, while consort music underwent a huge change of character at the hands of a brilliant new generation of professional musicians at the Jacobean andCarolinecourts. TheEnglish Civil War,and the change of taste brought about by theStuart Restoration,created a cultural hiatus which adversely affected the cultivation of Byrd's music together with that of Tudor composers in general.
In a small way, it was his Anglican church music which came closest to establishing a continuous tradition, at least in the sense that some of it continued to be performed in choral foundations after the Restoration and into the eighteenth century. Byrd's exceptionally long lifespan meant that he lived into an age in which many of the forms of vocal and instrumental music which he had made his own were beginning to lose their appeal to most musicians. Despite the efforts of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century antiquarians, the reversal of this judgement had to wait for the pioneering work of twentieth-century scholars fromE. H. Fellowesonwards.
In more recent times, Joseph Kerman,Oliver Neighbour,Philip Brett, John Harley, Richard Turbet, Alan Brown, Kerry McCarthy, and others have made major contributions to increasing our understanding of Byrd's life and music. In 1999,Davitt Moroney's recording of Byrd's complete keyboard music was released onHyperion(CDA66551/7; re-issued as CDS44461/7). This recording, which won the 2000Gramophone Awardin the Early Music category and a 2000Jahrespreis der deutschen Schallplattenkritik,came with a 100-page essay by Moroney on Byrd's keyboard music. In 2010,The Cardinall's Musick,under the direction ofAndrew Carwood,completed their recorded survey of Byrd's Latin church music. This series of thirteen recordings marks the first time that all of Byrd's Latin music has been available on disc.
Modern editions
edit- The Byrd Edition (gen. ed. P. Brett), Vols 1–17 (London, 1977–2004)
- A. Brown (ed.) William Byrd, Keyboard Music (Musica Britannica 27–28, London, 1971)
Notes
edit- ^Byrd's father may have been recorded in therollsof theWorshipful Company of Fletchersin London, and a person of the same name was buried on 12 November 1575 at the church ofAll Hallows Lombard Street(now demolished).[4]
References
edit- ^"William Byrd".Gramophone Magazine.Archived fromthe originalon 13 December 2022.Retrieved13 December2022.
- ^Nagley & Milsom 2002,p. 386.
- ^Harley 2016b,pp. 391–394.
- ^abHarley 2016a,p. 4.
- ^abcdeKerman 2001,p. 714.
- ^Harley 2016b,p. 14.
- ^McCarthy 2013,p. 4.
- ^abcMcCarthy 2013,p. 3.
- ^Harley 2016a,p. 18.
- ^abHarley 2016a,p. 52.
- ^Harley 2016a,pp. 46–47.
- ^Monson 2008.
- ^McCarthy 2013,p. 10.
- ^Harley 2016b,ch.2.
- ^Harley 2016b,pp. 38–40.
- ^Harley 2016b,p. 38.
- ^McCarthy 2013,pp. 51–52.
- ^Walker 1952,p. 48.
- ^Harley 2016b,pp. 65–66.
- ^Neighbour 2007.
- ^Harley 2016b,pp. 44–48
- ^Harley 2016b,p. 74.
- ^Kerman 1980,pp. 49–50.
- ^Harley 2016b,ch.5.
- ^Harley 2016b,pp. 90–92.
- ^Harley 2016b,p. 126.
- ^McCarthy 2013,p. 158.
- ^Brett 2007,p. viii.
- ^Walker 1952,p. 72.
- ^Kerman 1980,pp. 85–87.
- ^McCarthy 2004.
- ^Kerman 1980,p. 35ff.
- ^Kerman 1980,pp. 37–46.
- ^Smith 2016.
- ^Walker 1952,p. 77.
- ^Grapes 2018.
- ^Harley 2005.
- ^Clulow 1966.
- ^Harley 2016b,p. 142ff.
- ^Boyd 1962,pp. 81–83.
- ^Boyd 1962,p. 83.
- ^Finnis, J.; Martin, P. (18 April 2003). "Another Turn for the Turtle: Shakespeare's Intercession for Love's Martyr".Times Literary Supplement.pp.12–14.
Sources
edit- Boyd, Morrison Comegys (1962).Elizabethan Music and Musical Criticism.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.OCLC1156338180.
- Brett, Philip(2007).William Byrd and his Contemporaries: Essays and a Monograph.Berkeley:University of California Press.ISBN978-05202-4-758-1.
- Clulow, P. (1966). "Publication Dates for Byrd's Latin Masses".Music and Letters.47:1–9.doi:10.1093/ml/47.1.1.
- Grapes, K. Dawn (2018).With mornefull musique: funeral elegies in early modern England.Woodbridge, UK:Boydell Press.ISBN978-17832-7-351-5.
- Harley, J. (2005). "My Lady Nevell Revealed".Music and Letters.86:1–15.doi:10.1093/ml/gci001.191640785.
- Harley, John (2016a).The World of William Byrd: Musicians, Merchants and Magnates.Abingdon, UK; New York:Routledge.ISBN978-14094-0-088-2.
- Harley, John (2016b).William Byrd: Gentleman of the Chapel Royal.Abingdon, UK:Taylor & Francis.ISBN978-13515-3-694-3.
- Kerman, Joseph(1980).The Masses and Motets of William Byrd.Vol. 1. Berkeley:University of California Press.ISBN978-05200-4-033-5.
- Kerman, Joseph (2001)."Byrd, William".InSadie, Tyrrell;John, John(eds.).The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians.Vol. 4 (2nd ed.). London:Macmillan Publishers.ISBN978-03336-0-800-5.
- McCarthy, Kerry (2004). "Byrd, Augustine and Tribue Domine".Early Music.32(4):569–576.doi:10.1093/em/32.4.569.S2CID192168961.
- McCarthy, Kerry (2013).Byrd.Oxford:Oxford University Press.ISBN978-01953-8-875-6.
- Monson, Craig (2008). "Byrd, William (1539x43–1623)".Oxford Dictionary of National Biography(online ed.). Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/4267.(Subscription orUK public library membershiprequired.)
- Nagley, Judith; Milsom, John (2002). "Dunstaple, John". In Latham, Alison (ed.).The Oxford Companion to Music.Oxford:Oxford University Press.ISBN978-01995-7-903-7.
- Neighbour, Oliver(2007). "Music Manuscripts of George Iliffe from Stanford Hall, Leicestershire, including a new ascription to Byrd".Music and Letters.88(3). Oxford:Oxford University Press:420–435.doi:10.1093/ml/gcm007.ISSN0027-4224.192181960.
- Smith, Jeremy L. (2016).Verse and Voice in Byrd's Song Collections of 1588 and 1589.Woodbridge, UK:Boydell Press.ISBN978-17832-7-082-8.
- Walker, Ernest(1952).Westrup, J.A.(ed.).A History of Music in England(3rd ed.). Oxford:Clarendon Press.OCLC3748254.
Further reading
edit- Brown, Alan; Turbet, Richard, eds. (1992).Byrd Studies.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-05214-0-129-6.
- Neighbour, Oliver(1978).The Consort and Keyboard Music of William Byrd.Berkeley:University of California Press.ISBN978-05200-3-486-0.
- Turbet, Richard (1987).William Byrd: A Guide to Research.New York: Garland.ISBN978-08240-8-388-5.
- Turbet, Richard (2012).William Byrd: A Research and Information Guide(3rd ed.). New York:Routledge.ISBN978-02031-1-234-2.
External links
edit- A complete list of works by William ByrdfromStainer & Bell
- Free scores by William Byrdat theInternational Music Score Library Project(IMSLP)
- Free scores by William Byrdin theChoral Public Domain Library(ChoralWiki)
- List of compositions by William Byrdat theDigital Image Archive of Medieval Music(DIAMM) – a detailed alphabetical list
Recordings
edit- Free recordings ofMadrigals,Latin Church Music
- Free recordings ofByrd'sAve verum corpus(Archived14 March 2016 at theWayback Machine)
- Free recordings ofMass for four voices and some Christmas motets
- MotetAve Verum Corpusas interactive hypermedia at theBinAural Collaborative Hypertext
- Kunst der Fuge:William Byrd – Free MIDI files