Anti-Defamation League

For other uses, seeAnti-Defamation League (disambiguation).

TheAnti-Defamation League(ADL), formerly known as theAnti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith,is a New York–based internationalnon-governmental organizationthat was founded to combatantisemitism,bigotryanddiscrimination.ADL is also known for its pro-Israel advocacy.

Anti-Defamation League

Formation	September 1913(1913-09)
Founder	Sigmund Livingston
Type	Civil rightsadvocacy group
Tax ID no.	13-1818723 (EIN)
Legal status	501(c)(3) organization
Headquarters	New York City,New York,U.S.
Chair	Ben Sax
CEO	Jonathan Greenblatt
Revenue(2021)	$101.1 million
Expenses(2021)	$81.5 million
Staff(2021)	501
Volunteers(2021)	3,500
Website	adl.org
Formerly called	Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith

It was founded in late September 1913 by the Independent Order ofB'nai B'rith,a Jewishservice organization,in the wake of the contentious murder conviction ofLeo Frank.ADL subsequently split from B'nai B'rith and continued as an independent US section 501(c)(3)nonprofit.Its current CEO isJonathan Greenblatt.ADL headquarters are located inMurray Hill,in theNew York Cityborough ofManhattan.The ADL has 25 regional offices in the United Statesincluding a Government Relations Office in Washington, D.C., as well as an office in Israel and staff in Europe.In its 2019 annual information Form 990, ADL reported total revenues of $92 million, the vast majority from contributions and grants.Its total operating revenue is reported at $80.9 million.

In an early campaign, ADL and allied groups pressured the automakerHenry Ford,who had published virulently antisemitic propaganda.In the 1930s, ADL worked with the American Jewish Committee (AJC) to opposepro-Naziactivity in the United States.It opposedMcCarthyismduring theCold War,and campaigned for major civil rights legislation in the 1960s.In the 1980s, it was involved in propaganda againstNelson Mandelaof South Africa before embracing him the following decade.

As a pro-Israel group, the ADL has received criticism, including from members of its own staff, that its advocacy for Israel and promotion of the concept ofnew antisemitism,which includesanti-Zionism,replaced the organization's historical fight against antisemitism.In 2024, thecommunityofEnglish Wikipediareached a consensus that the ADL was not a reliable source of information regarding theIsraeli-Palestinian conflict.

History

In its early decades, the ADL benefited from being among the few highly centralized Jewish community relations organizations alongside the American Jewish Committee and American Jewish Congress. This characteristic gave these three organizations greater influence on the national Jewish community at a time when most local congregations and organizations were splintered, with little outreach to the broader community. By the 1970s, decentralization yielded greater influence. By this point the ADL had succeeded in developing local branches, though the central office remained significant even in terms of local branch activities.

Origins

The ADL was founded in late September 1913 byB'nai B'rith,withSigmund Livingstonas its first leader.Its goals were to counter antisemitism, prejudice and discrimination.Initially the league largely represented Midwestern and Southern Jews concerned with antagonistic portrayals of Jews in popular culture along with social and economic discrimination.In 1913, Atlanta B'nai B'rith PresidentLeo Frankwas convicted of the murder of a 13-year-old employee at a factory where he was superintendent; historians today generally consider Frank to have been innocent.Jewish leadership viewed Frank as having been wrongly prosecuted and convicted because of local antisemitism and agitation by some of the local press.The role that prejudice played in Frank's conviction was mentioned byAdolf Krauswhen he announced the creation of the ADL.According to historians, ADL's early strategy would be to pressure newspapers, theaters, and other businesses seen as defaming or discriminating against Jews; proposed methods included boycotts and pressuring advertisers, and it also considered demanding prior reviews of theater productions for antisemitism.After Georgia's outgoing governor commuted Frank's death sentence to life imprisonment in 1915, alynch mobabducted Frank from prison and killed him.Frank was granted a posthumouspardonfrom Georgia in 1986 after ADL requests.

1920s through 1960s

See also:Jews in the civil rights movement

The historian Leonard Dinnerstein writes that until after World War II, the ADL had limited impact, particularly less than theAmerican Jewish Committee(AJC).One of the ADL's early campaigns occurred in the 1920s when it organized a media effort and consumer boycott againstThe Dearborn Independent,a publication published by American automobile industrialistHenry Ford.The publication contained virulently antisemitic articles and quoted heavily fromThe Protocols of the Elders of Zion,an antisemitic hoax. The ADL and allied organizations pressured Ford until he issued an apology in 1927.

In 1933 the ADL moved offices to Chicago and Richard E. Gutstadt became director of national activities. With the change in leadership, the ADL shifted from Livingston's reactive responses to antisemitic action to a much more aggressive policy.

During the 1930s, ADL, along with the AJC, coordinated American Jewish groups across the country in monitoring the activities of theGerman-American Bundand its pro-Nazi, nativist allies in the United States. In many instances, these community-based defense organizations paid informants to infiltrate these groups and report on what they discovered. The longest-lived and most effective of these American Jewish resistance organizations was the Los Angeles Jewish Community Committee (LAJCC), which was backed financially by the Jewish leaders of the motion picture industry. The day-to-day operations of the LAJCC were supervised by a Jewish attorney,Leon L. Lewis.Lewis was uniquely qualified to combat the rise of Nazism in Los Angeles, having served as the first national secretary of the Anti-Defamation League in Chicago from 1925 to 1931. From 1934 to 1941, the LAJCC maintained its undercover surveillance of the German-American Bund, theSilver Shirtsand dozens of other pro-Nazi, nativist groups that operated in Los Angeles. Partnering with the American Legion in Los Angeles, the LAJCC channeled eyewitness accounts of sedition on to federal authorities. Working with the ADL, Leon Lewis and the LAJCC played a strategic role in counseling theMcCormack-Dickstein Committeeinvestigation of Nazi propaganda activities in the United States (1934) and the Dies Committee investigation of "un-American activities" (1938–1940). In their final reports to Congress, both committees found that the sudden rise in politicalantisemitism in the United Statesduring the decade was due, in part, to the German government's support of these domestic groups.

Paralleling its infiltration efforts, the ADL continued its attempts to reduce antisemitic caricatures in the media. Much like theNAACP,it chose a non-confrontational approach, attempting to build long-lasting relationships and avoid backlash. The ADL requested its members avoid public confrontation, instead directing them to send letters to the media and advertising companies that included antisemitic or racist references in screening copies of their books and movies. This strategy kept the campaigns out of the public eye and instead emphasized the development of a relationship with companies.

The ADL opposedred-baitingandMcCarthyismin the 1950s.The ADL campaigned forcivil rightslegislation including theCivil Rights Act of 1964and theVoting Rights Act of 1965.

1970s and 1980s

In 1973,Nathan Perlmuttertook the role of national director, serving until his death in 1987.Under the tenure of Perlmutter and his 1978–1983 co-director of interreligious affairsYechiel Eckstein,the ADL shifted its approach to the evangelical Christian movement. Through the 60s and early 70s, the ADL had conflicted with the American Jewish Congress over their collaborations with evangelicals. Perlmutter and Eckstein changed this orientation, increasing collaborations and developing long-lasting lines of communication between the ADL and evangelical groups. This collaboration continued under the Foxman administration.

Since the 1970s, the ADL has partnered with theFederal Bureau of Investigation(FBI) field offices, sharing information learned from the monitoring of extremist groups.

In 1977 the ADL opened a headquarters inJerusalem.

It opposed ananti-Mormonfilm calledThe God Makersin 1982, viewing it a challenge to religious freedom.

1990s

The ADL released a 1991 report observing an increase in the use of public access television stations by extremist groups. The report came in the wake of the trial ofTom Metzger,a white supremacist leader found guilty of inciting a murder via his public access TV station.

San Francisco police searched two offices of the ADL in April 1993, suspecting it of having monitored thousands of activists; in the search, they confiscated police records including fingerprints and copies of confidential reports, according to court documents.The San Francisco district attorney considered indictments, but settled with the ADL in November 1993 in exchange for the ADL paying $75,000 for use fighting hate crimes.During the investigation, a private investigator hired by the ADL, Roy H. Bullock, told police he had trackedskinheads,white supremacists,Arab Americans,and critics of Israel. He confessed to trying to find “any sexual impropriety” on the late anti-apartheid activistDesmond Tutu.In court documents, state officials said that the ADL conspired to obtain the confidential police material, a felony in California, and that the ADL had violated state tax laws by paying Bullock through a lawyer.The court documents said ADL had a network of sympathetic police officers sharing data, and that investigators had questioned police about free sponsored trips to Israel they received from the ADL. The documents also mentioned that the ADL's spying operations were reported to the Israeli government and its intelligence agencies.The ADL's Foxman contended that the ADL had a right to use the police information to combat antisemitism, and he argued in an interview that allegations that the ADL acted as an agent for Israel were "antisemitic".

News of the investigation led Arab Americans listed in the ADL's files to sue the ADL, contending invasion of privacy and the forwarding of confidential information to Israel and South Africa. In 1996, ADL settled the federal civil lawsuit filed by groups representingAfrican AmericansandArab Americans.The ADL did not admit any wrongdoing but agreed to a restraining injunction barring it from obtaining information from state employees who cannot legally disclose such information.The ADL agreed to contribute $25,000 to a fund that funds inter-community relationship projects, and cover the plaintiffs' legal costs of $175,000.It settled with three remaining plaintiffs in 2002 for $178,000.

In 1994, ADL became involved in a dispute between neighbors in Denver, Colorado. The Aronson family reported this dispute to the ADL, which involved the Quigley family making antisemitic comments. The ADL advised the Aronsons to record the Quigleys' private telephone conversations via a police scanner. These recordings were legal at the time, but federal wiretap law was amended shortly after to make it illegal to record conversations from a cordless telephone, to transcribe the material, and to use the transcriptions for any purpose.ADL Regional Director Saul Rosenthal described the recorded remarks as part of a "vicious antisemitic campaign". This led to the family being ridiculed and excluded in their community and to career damage. These recordings were used as basis for a federal civil lawsuit against the Aronson family and the ADL fordefamation.The Quigleys and Aronsons settled out-of-court,and a jury awarded the Quigleys $10 million in damages from the ADL.

This was the first-ever verdict against the ADL. Only once before had the League been subject to a defamation trial, a case it won in 1984. Other cases were dismissed before reaching trial.The ADL appealed the case to a superior court, which upheld the verdict, and the Supreme Court ultimately declined to take the case. The ADL paid the original $10 million plus interest in 2004.

2000s

In 2003, the ADL opposed an advertising campaign byPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals(PETA) called "Holocaust on Your Plate" that compared animals killed in the meat industry to victims of theHolocaust.In 2005, PETA apologized for causing distress to the Jewish community through the campaign, though in 2008, theChief Rabbinateannounced that it was planning to gradually phase out the use of the "shackle and hoist" method ofkosher slaughterin Israel and South America, in part in response to pressure from PETA.

As of 2007, the ADL said it was archiving MySpace pages associated with white supremacists as part of its effort to track extremism.

The ADL opposed2008 California Proposition 8,a ballot successful initiative that banned same-sex marriage. It did so alongside Jewish organizations, including the National Council of Jewish Women and the Progressive Jewish Alliance.The ADL filedamicus briefsurging theSupreme Court of California,Ninth Circuit,and theSupreme Courtto invalidate Prop 8.In 2015, the ADL opposed theState Religious Freedom Restoration Acts,state laws that used the United States Supreme Court decision inBurwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.recognizing a for-profit corporation's claim of religious belief. The ADL opposed these laws out of concern they largely targeted LGBT people or denied access to contraceptives to employees of religiously owned businesses.

The ADL became independent from B'nai B'rith in 2009, dropping the reference to the other organization in its name.

2010s

Greenblatt in 2017

The ADL was one of the groups that opposed theShelby County v. Holderdecision by theSupreme Courtin 2013 to strike down a portion of theVoting Rights Act.The court's decision ended the portion of the law that required states with a history of discrimination to undergo federal scrutiny for election rules.

In November 2014, the organization announced thatJonathan Greenblatt,a former Silicon Valley tech executive and formerObama administrationofficial who had not operated within the Jewish communal organization world prior to his hiring, would succeedAbraham Foxmanas national director in July 2015.Foxman had served as national director since 1987. The ADL board of directors renewed Greenblatt's contract as CEO and national director in fall 2020 for a second five-year term. The national chair of the governing board of directors is Esta Gordon Epstein; elected in late 2018 for a three-year term, she is the second woman to hold the organization's top volunteer leadership post.

ADL repeatedly accusedDonald Trump,when he was a presidential candidate in 2016, of making use of antisemitic tropes or otherwise exploiting divisive and bigoted rhetoric during the2016 presidential election campaign.The ADL accused President Trump of politicizing charges of antisemitism for partisan purposes,and for continued use of antisemitic tropes.

In mid-2018, ADL raised concerns over President Donald Trump's nomination of then-DC Circuit Court of Appeals judgeBrett Kavanaughas an Associate Justice of theUnited States Supreme Court.Subsequently, in another move that enraged many on the right, ADL called for the resignation or firing ofTrump administrationofficialStephen Miller,the architect of the administration's immigration policy, on the basis of his association with white supremacists.

The ADL says it has participated inYouTube's Trusted Flagger program and has encouraged YouTube to remove videos that they flag as hate speech, citing the need to "fight against terrorist use of online resources and cyberhate."The ADL's Center on Technology and Society launched a survey in 2019 exploring online harassment in video games. It found that the majority of surveyed players experienced severe harassment of some kind, and the ADL recommended increased content moderation from game companies and governments. On the other hand, the survey found that over half of players experienced some form of positive community in video games. A separate, earlier survey of the general population found that around a third of people have experienced some form of online harassment.

In July 2017, ADL announced that they would be developing profiles on 36alt-rightandalt-liteleaders.In 2019 and 2020 ADL executives and staff testified multiple times in front of Congressional committees concerning the dangers of right-wing domestic extremists.In a report from 2018, the ADL noted that the majority of domestic extremist-related murders in the United States over the past decade had been committed by white supremacists.In a 2023 report, white supremacists were also deemed responsible for 45% of right-wing extremism in the US from 2017–2022.

2020s

In 2020, ADL joined with theNAACP,Color of Change,LULAC,Free Press,theNational Hispanic Media Coalitionand other organizations in theStop Hate For Profitcampaign.The campaign targeted online hate on Facebook, with over 1000 businesses pausing their ad buys on Facebook for a month. Subsequently, in September 2020, the campaign organized celebrity supporters includingSacha Baron Cohen,Kim Kardashian,andMark Ruffalo.

In 2020, the ADL trained staff to edit Wikipedia pages, but after the project caused Wikipedia editors to criticize this as aconflict of interest,the ADL said it suspended the project in April 2021. At the time, the ADL was considered areliable sourceon Wikipedia, and the ADL said its staff complied with Wikipedia policies by disclosing their affiliations, but some Wikipedia editors objected that the project cited ADL sources disproportionately and did not reflect the volunteer spirit of the website, especially in heavily editing its own Wikipedia article.

An internal email obtained byThe Guardianin 2024 showed that in May 2020, the ADL had surveilled and produced a "threat assessment" report on a BlackIndianapolisactivist who worked with theDeadly Exchangecampaign in opposition to exchange programs between American and Israeli police. The email contained a photo and personal information about the activist. The ADL employee who shared the email with The Guardian said that "threat assessments" are conducted regularly by the ADL and that many staff members opposed the spying.

In early January 2021, the ADL called for the removal of Donald Trump as president in response to thestorming of the United States Capitoland described the relationship of the storming of the Capitol to the far-right and antisemitic groups.In April 2021, Jonathan Greenblatt released a letter calling on the right-wing American networkFox Newsto drop commentatorTucker Carlsonfrom its lineup, saying that Carlson had espoused thewhite genocide conspiracy theoryon his show.This call appeared shortly after research indicating that many who participated in the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol had been influenced by this conspiracy theory.The ADL again called for Carlson to be fired in September 2021 following Carlson expressing support for thegreat replacementtheory.Carlson responded, saying "Fuck them" regarding the ADL, describing the ADL's call as politically motivated and defending his statements.In 2023, Fox dropped Carlson, a move welcomed by ADL leadership.

In 2022, the ADL revised its 2020 definition ofracismfrom “the marginalization and/or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges White people” to occurrence “when individuals or institutions show more favorable evaluation or treatment of an individual or group based on race or ethnicity.”

In November 2022, ADL acquired JLens, a pro-Israel advocacy group started in 2012 which campaigns against incentives for economic disengagement with Israel inenvironmental, social, and corporate governance(ESG) investing guidelines. JLens publishes company rankings based on participation in boycotts of Israel and publishes guidelines on investing used by around 30 Jewish companies with portfolios totaling around $200 million. JLens launched a campaign criticizingMorningstar, Inc.), a campaign the ADL collaborated on prior to the 2020 acquisition. The ADL said it would contribute funding to JLens.

The ADL tracked rapid growth in hate speech and harassment onTwitterafterElon Muskbought the social network in 2022.In early September 2023, Musk liked and replied to a tweet by the Irish white nationalist Keith Woods that called for banning the ADL from X, which was Twitter's new name under Musk.Musk also accused the ADL of defamation and threatened to sue it, writing that advertising revenue was "still down 60%, primarily due to pressure on advertisers by @ADL (that's what advertisers tell us), so they almost succeeded in killing X/Twitter!" The ADL said as matter of policy it did not comment on legal threats, but that it had recently met with X leadership including CEOLinda Yaccarino,who had thanked the ADL's CEO on the platform.Greenblatt later praised Musk after he announced policy banning phrases such as "decolonization"and"from the river to the sea"on Twitter.The head of the ADL's Center for Technology and Society (CTS), Yael Eisenstat, reportedly quit in protest of the praise of Musk.

Political positions

Israeli–Palestinian conflict

The ADL is described as a pro-Israel group.

The ADL has taken a case-by-case approach to stateanti-BDS lawsenacted in response to theBDS movement.Several of these laws, which seek to prohibit state agencies and instrumentalities from investing in companies that boycott Israel and from entering into contracts with entities that boycott Israel, have been successfully challenged in the courts. The legal challenges have primarily been brought by theACLUandCAIRon First Amendment constitutional grounds.As a general matter the organization also has not publicly opposed such state laws, preferring to work behind the scenes to try to make such laws less infirm under the Constitution or to propose non-binding resolutions opposing BDS. A possible division of internal views in ADL was disclosed when the liberal Jewish publication,The Forward,published ostensible leaked internal ADL staff memos dating from 2016 that opposed the anti-boycott laws.ADL did not comment directly on the leaked memos, but the statement it issued in response appeared to acknowledge both that there were sharply divided views within the organization and that the organization did not try to suppress internal robust discussion.

In 2010, ADL published a list of the "ten leading organizations responsible for maligning Israel in the US," which has includedANSWER,theInternational Solidarity Movement,andJewish Voice for Peacefor its call for BDS.The ADL published a similar list in 2013.

Alongside similar statements from StandWithUs and American Jewish Committee representatives, Greenblatt condemned theUnited Nations Human Rights Council's (UNHRC) list of companies doing business with Jewish settlements in Israeli-run territories (West Bank, East Jerusalem, Golan Heights), issued in February 2020, calling it a "blacklist".

Conflation of anti-Zionism and antisemitism

See also:Anti-Zionism

In a 2022 speech to ADL leaders, Greenblatt said that "anti-Zionismis antisemitism ".The Times of Israelnoted that the "speech marked a rare moment of the organization unequivocally" making that assertion.The remarks upset activists and Jewish groups critical of Israel, and also set off controversy within the ADL.Internal ADL messages seen byThe Guardianincluded a senior manager at ADL's Center on Extremism writing in protest that: "There is no comparison between white supremacists and insurrectionists and those who espouse anti-Israel rhetoric, and to suggest otherwise is both intellectually dishonest and damaging to our reputation as experts in extremism."The newspaper reported that the speech, which "put opposition to Israel on a par with white supremacy as a source of antisemitism", had sparked controversy.

In January 2024, two-thirds of ADL's tally of more than 3,283 antisemitic incidents in the United States since October 7, 2023, were tied to theIsrael-Hamas war;The Forwardsaid the ADL acknowledged "that it significantly broadened its definition of antisemitic incidents following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack to include rallies that feature 'anti-Zionist chants and slogans,' events that appear to account for around 1,317 of the total count".The ADL classified anti-war protest events led by Jewish groups includingJewish Voice for PeaceandIfNotNowas "anti-Israel", adding the protests to a database documenting rising antisemitism in the US. In response, an ADL staffer quit, who told the Guardian that "These were Jewish people who we [as the ADL] were defaming, so that felt extremely, extremely confusing, and frustrating to me. And it makes it harder to talk about that when any criticism of Israel, or anyone who criticizes Israel, just becomes a terrorist."The ADL toldThe Interceptthat it did not consider the protests antisemitic, but Greenblatt labelled the protesting groups as hate groups.Former staff toldThe Daily Beastin 2023 of dissent within the ADL over the increasing equation of anti-Zionism and antisemitism, and over Greenblatt's calls for bans and investigations of pro-Palestinian organizations that he alleged had supported terrorist groups.In early 2024, two ADL staff quit the group in response to pro-Israel advocacy during the war.

ADL supported a 5 December 2023 US Congress resolution that described anti-Zionism as antisemitism.The ADL and "many other Jewish establishment organizations" have campaigned for governments to adopt theInternational Holocaust Remembrance Alliancedefinition of antisemitism, which describes anti-Zionism and some forms of criticism of Israel as antisemitic, according toThe Guardian.Some Jewish organizations, such as theNexus Task Force,whose work was welcomed by theU.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism,take a different view.

Critics of the ADL said that such advocacy for Israel had undermined the group's counter-extremism work and argued that it had foregone parts of its historical mission against antisemitism, according toThe Guardian.In 2024, an article inThe Nationsaid, "The ADL's priority today remains—as it has for decades—going after Americans who are simply opposed to Israel's endless occupation and oppression of Palestinians", and criticized what it described as US media outlets using ADL reports on antisemitism uncritically.

New antisemitism concept

Main article:New antisemitism

In 1974, ADL attorneyArnold Forsterand national directorBenjamin Epsteinpublished the bookThe New Anti-Semitism.They expressed concern about what they described as new manifestations of antisemitism coming from radical left, radical right, and pro-Arab figures in the US.Forster and Epstein argued that radical left antisemitism took the form of indifference to the fears of the Jewish people, apathy in dealing with anti-Jewish bias, and an inability to understand the importance of Israel to Jewish survival.A subsequent book,The Real Anti-Semitism in America,published in 1982, was written by ADL national leader Nathan Perlmutter and his wife, Ruth Ann Perlmutter.

Reviewing Forster and Epstein's work in 1974 for theneoconservativemagazineCommentary,Earl Raab, founding director of the Nathan Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy atBrandeis University,agreed that a "new anti-Semitism" was indeed emerging in America in the form of opposition to the supposed collective rights of the Jewish people, but Raab criticized Forster and Epstein for "stretch[ing] the word in practice to mean anti-Israel bias in general".Allan Brownfeld, a columnist withThe Lincoln Review,wrote in theJournal of Palestine Studies1987 that Forster and Epstein's new definition of antisemitism trivialized the concept by turning it into "a form of political blackmail" and "a weapon with which to silence any criticism of either Israel or US policy in the Middle East,"whileEdward S. Shapiro,inA Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II,has written that, "Forster and Epstein implied that the new antisemitism was the inability of Gentiles to love Jews and Israel enough."

In 2005,Norman Finkelsteinwrote that organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League have brought forward charges of new antisemitism at various intervals since the 1970s, "not to fight antisemitism, but rather to exploit the historical suffering of Jews in order to immunize Israel against criticism."The Washington Postreported in 2006 that the ADL had over the years repeatedly accused Finkelstein of being a "Holocaust denier",and that" these charges have proved baseless. "

Circumcision

ADL has opposed efforts in the US and in Europe to bancircumcisionof minors on the grounds of parental and religious freedom, citing the importance of circumcision in Judaism and Islam.ADL has also criticized specific instances of anti-circumcision imagery, such as an anti-circumcision cartoon in the Norwegian newspaperDagbladetand the comic bookForeskin Man.Regarding the latter, Associate Regional Director Nancy Appel stated that while good people could disagree on the issue of circumcision, it was unacceptable to use antisemitic imagery within the debate.ADL also criticized an anti-circumcision resolution by theParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe,describing it as "leading Europe in a horrific direction toward the forced exclusion of Jewish citizens."In 2018, Greenblatt sentIceland's Parliamenta letter regarding a proposed infant circumcision ban in that country, arguing that the ban should be rejected due to circumcision's religious significance and health benefits. Greenblatt also said that if the ban passed, ADL would report on any celebration by antisemites and other extremists, asserting that this would deter tourism and harm Iceland's economy.TheReykjavík Grapevinedescribed this letter as a threat.

Federal and state legislation

ADL was among the lead organizations campaigning for thirteen years, ultimately successfully, for theMatthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.The hold-up in passing that law focused on the inclusion of the term "sexual orientation" as one of the bases that a crime could be deemed a hate crime.ADL also drafted the model hate crimes legislation in the 1980s; it serves as a model for the legislation that a majority of states have adopted.

In 2010, during a hearing for Florida House Bill 11 (Crimes Against Homeless Persons), which was to revise the list of offenses judged to behate crimesin Florida by adding a person's homeless status,the League lobbied against the bill, which subsequently passed in the House by a vote of 80 to 28 and was sent to the Senate,taking the position that adding more categories to the list would dilute the effectiveness of the law, which already includes race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, and age.

ADL expressed concern over Israeli legislative proposals requiring that NGOs publicize if they receive funding primarily from non-Israeli governments, a bill mostly opposed by centrist and left-wing and supported by right-wing Jewish American groups.

College classes and student organizations

In early 2023, the ADL unsuccessfully pressuredBard Collegeto cancel a course called "Apartheidin Israel-Palestine "taught by Jerusalem-based researcherNathan Thrall.The course had also been objected to by an Israeli consul. Bard's president,Leon Botstein,described the phone call with ADL CEO Greenblatt as "not civil".

In October 2023, the ADL sent letters to almost two hundred college presidents condemningStudents for Justice in Palestine(SJP) chapters, encouraging college presidents to investigate the chapters and alleging that SJP may be funding or receiving funds from Hamas.National SJP denied the ADL's claims.

Policing in the United States

ADL advocacy work extends into police trainings on anti-semitism, hate crime reporting, and bias. ADL has also given awards and honors to various persons and agencies in law enforcement, includingRaymond KellyandWilliam BrattonofNYPD,Houston PolicechiefArt Acevedo,and officers ofSt. Louis County Police Department.

Analysis ofBlueLeaksfiles shows a strong relationship between the ADL and American law enforcement agencies, with the ADL being among a small group of community organizations that provide training or are consulted by law enforcement officers.

Delegations

The ADL facilitatesUS policedelegations to Israel and the National Counter-Terrorism Seminar. The focus is oncounterterrorism,tactics and strategies, and leadership. The ADL director of law enforcement initiatives expressed hope that Israeli police are seen as a model for police in the US, and says that police officers participating in trips to Israel "come back and they are Zionists." In addition to police agencies, participants in the program include leadership fromICE,US Marshals,andNaval Criminal Investigative Service.

The National Counter-Terrorism Seminar received wide attention following theFerguson Uprisingwhen it was revealed that formerSt. Louis County Policechief Timothy Fitch was a previous participant, as well as leaders of other police forces that had demonstrated undue force and surveillance against civilians.Campaigns against the trips,citingmilitarization of policeconcerns, were successful inVermontandDurham, North Carolina.In 2020, the program was put on pause due to the associated costs and controversies. An internal memo opened questions as to the purpose and unintended impacts of the delegations, and recommended ending them altogether.ADL told press that they intend to continue the program with revised curriculum and evaluation.

South Africa and apartheid

The ADL, the AJC, and other American Jewish groups askedNelson Mandelato clarify his views on theIsraeli–Palestinian conflictin 1990 in advance of a visit Mandela planned to the United States. The groups' leaders said they were concerned about the possibility of protests because Mandela had embracedPalestine Liberation OrganizationChairmanYasser Arafatand Libyan presidentMuammar Gaddafi.The ADL said it was "disturbed and pained" by comments Mandela had made in a meeting earlier that year with PLO leader Yasser Arafat.Mandela met with a group of the American Jewish leaders inGenevaincluding ADL director Abe Foxman. At the event, Mandela expressed appreciation for South African Jews who opposed apartheid, praised past Israeli leadersGolda MeirandMenachem Begin,and said that the State of Israel had a right to exist.

In his 2010 bookThe Unspoken Alliance,Sasha Polakow-Suranskycriticized the ADL for hiring the private spy Roy Bullock to collect information on the anti-apartheid movement in the United States.Glenn Frankel,writing about the book, said the ADL "participated in a blatant propaganda campaign against Nelson Mandela and the ANC" during the 1980s but had changed its stance on Mandela around 1990 with Foxman calling him a hero.South African-born Israeli journalistBenjamin Pogrundsaid in a review ofThe Unspoken AllianceforThe Jewish Chroniclethat the ADL and South Africa's Jewish Board of Deputies "played toadying and inglorious roles over the years in defendingIsrael's tiesand in support of the apartheid government ".

Armenian genocide

Prior to 2007, the ADL described theArmenian genocideas a massacre and an atrocity, but not agenocide.Foxman had earlier opposed calls for the US Government to recognise it as a genocide.ADL was reported to have received direct pressure from the Turkish foreign ministry.

InWatertown, Massachusetts,which has a significant Armenian population, the town council in early August 2007 decided unanimously to withdraw from ADL's "No Place for Hate" anti-discrimination campaign over the issue. Human rights commissions in some other Massachusetts communities also withdrew in subsequent months.An editorial inThe Boston Globecriticized the ADL, saying, "as an organization concerned about human rights, it ought to acknowledge the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I, and criticize Turkish attempts to repress the memory of this historical reality."On August 17, 2007, ADL fired its regional New England director, Andrew H. Tarsy, for breaking ranks and saying that ADL should recognize the genocide.In its August 21, 2007, "Statement on the Armenian Genocide", ADL acknowledged the genocide, but maintained its opposition to congressional resolutions aimed at recognizing it.Foxman wrote that "the consequences of those actions" by theOttoman Empireagainst Armenians "were indeed tantamount to genocide" and "If the word genocide had existed then, they would have called it genocide".TheTurkish governmentcondemned the league's statement.It was also criticized by activists who believed that it failed to be unequivocal because of its qualifier "tantamount".TheArmenian National Committeewelcomed the ADL's change of position but criticized its lack of support for legislation.Tarsy won his job back,but he subsequently submitted his resignation, on December 4, 2007.

On May 2, 2014, an ADL statement said it was "deeply concerned by ongoing questions about our organization's position with regard to the Armenian Genocide". It said that the ADL had not denied atrocities against Armenians.

On October 28, 2019, the ADL endorsed the bipartisan H. Res. 296, which states that the U.S. officially recognizes the Armenian genocide and encourages education and public understanding on the issue. ADL also endorsed and encouraged action on S. Res. 150, the resolution's identical bipartisan companion measure in the Senate.

Park51 Community Center opposition

In 2010, ADL issued a statement opposing thePark51Community Center, a proposed Islamic community center and mosque two blocks from theWorld Trade Center sitein New York. It said, "The controversy which has emerged regarding the building of a Community Center at this location is counterproductive to the healing process. Therefore, under these unique circumstances, we believe the City of New York would be better served if an alternative location could be found."ADL denounced what it saw as bigoted attacks on the project. Foxman opined that some of those who oppose the mosque are "bigots", and that the plan's proponents may have every right to build the mosque at that location. Nevertheless, he said that building the mosque at that site would unnecessarily cause more pain for the families of some victims of 9/11.

This opposition to the Community Center led to criticism of the statement from various parties, including one ADL board member, the American Jewish Committee, theJewish Community Relations Council of New York,RabbiIrwin Kula,columnistsJeffrey GoldbergandPeter Beinart,theInterfaith Alliance,and theShalom Center.In an interview withThe New York TimesAbraham Foxman published a statement in reaction to criticism.In protest of ADL's stance,CNNhostFareed Zakariareturned the Hubert H. Humphrey First Amendment Freedoms Prize ADL awarded him in 2005.ADL chair Robert G. Sugarman responded to a criticalNew York Timeseditorialwriting, "we have publicly taken on those who criticized the mosque in ways that reflected anti-Muslim bigotry or used the controversy for that purpose" and stating that ADL has combated Islamophobia.

On September 5, 2021, the national director and CEO of ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, apologized for ADL's opposition to the center, stating, "We were wrong, plain and simple".

Other

In October 2010, the ADL condemned remarks byOvadia Yosefthat the sole purpose of non-Jews was to serve the Jews.

ADL supportsComprehensiveandDREAM Actlegislation that would provide conditional permanent residency to certain undocumented immigrants of good moral character who graduate from US high schools, arrived in the United States as minors, and lived in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill's enactment.

The ADL repeatedly criticized Trump for what they viewed as antisemitic tropes and engagement in apologetics for white supremacists.Alongside at least eight other Jewish advocacy organizations, dozens of civil rights organizations, and more than one hundred members of congress, ADL called on the Trump administration to fire administration executiveStephen Miller,the architect of the Trump administration policies on immigration, condemning Miller as a white supremacist.

In 2022, the ADL criticized the government formed byBenjamin Netanyahuinhis sixth term,which included representatives from the far-rightOtzma YehuditandReligious Zionist Party,and their leaders,Itamar Ben-GvirandBezalel Smotrich.The ADL said that including these parties and lawmakers "would run counter to Israel's founding principles, and impact its standing, even among its strongest supporters."

Relations with religious and ethnic groups

Relations with African-Americans

During the 1970s, the ADL was a staunch opponent ofaffirmative action,with its then-leader Perlmutter one of the national figures in opposition.It filed an amicus brief in support of Allan Bakke, the white student in the landmark 1978Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court Case that struck downracial quotasfor university students.Differences on the issue and others were described as leading to a rift between Jewish and African-American groups in the 1970s.In the 2003 landmark Supreme Court caseGrutter v. Bollinger,the ADL filed a brief opposing theUniversity of Michigan's affirmative action program, but its argument did not propose to end affirmative action entirely; rather, the ADL contended that race "may appropriately be considered in the admissions process," but with no more weight than other characteristics of applicants.

In 1984,The Boston Globereported that then-ADL national director Nathan Perlmutter said that Rev.Jesse Jackson,Sr. was antisemitic after Jackson referred to New York City as "Hymietown".

The ADL criticized film directorSpike Leeregarding his portrayal of Jewish nightclub owners Moe and Josh Flatbush in his filmMo' Better Blues(1990). The ADL said the characterizations of the nightclub owners "dredge up an age-old and highly dangerous form of anti-Semitic stereotyping", and that it was "disappointed that Spike Lee – whose success is largely due to his efforts to break down racial stereotypes and prejudice – has employed the same kind of tactics that he supposedly deplores".Lee's portrayal also angered the B'nai B'rith and other such Jewish organizations, causing Lee to address the criticism in an opinion piece forThe New York Times,where he stated "...if critics are telling me that to avoid charges of anti-Semitism, all Jewish characters I write have to be model citizens, and not one can be a villain, cheat or a crook, and that no Jewish people have ever exploited black artists in the history of the entertainment industry, that's unrealistic and unfair".

In 2004, ADL became the lead partner in thePeace and Diversity Academy,a new New York City public high school with predominantly black and Hispanic students. The school was part of a Bloomberg-led effort to open many smaller schools. In 2014, the school was designated among New York's schools with the lowest graduation rates.

In 2018 the ADL criticized US RepresentativeDanny Davisfor not condemningLouis Farrakhan.Davis subsequently condemned Farrakhan's views, saying, "So let me be clear: I reject, condemn and oppose Minister Farrakhan's views and remarks regarding the Jewish people and the Jewish religion."

Interfaith camp

In 1996 ADL's New England Regional Office established a faith-based initiative called "The Interfaith Youth Leadership Program", better known as "Camp If", or Camp Interfaith. Involving teenagers of the Christian, Jewish, and Islamic faiths, the camp brings the teens together for a week at camp where the teens bond and learn about each other's cultures. The camp has emerged as a new attempt to foster good relations between younger members of the Abrahamic faiths.

Reception and controversies

ADL has been criticized both from therightandleftof the US political spectrum, including from within the American Jewish community.ADL positions and actions that have generated criticism include domestic spying,its formerArmenian genocide denial(since repudiated and apologized for),and what parts of the American left argue is the ADL's conflation ofcriticism of the Israeli governmentwith antisemitism.ADL's support for theTrump administration's decision to move the US Embassy fromTel Avivto Jerusalem in May 2018drew criticism.Right-wing groups and pundits, including right-wing Jewish groups, have criticized ADL as having moved too far to the left under Jonathan Greenblatt, labeling it a "Democratic Partyauxiliary ".

Graduate student and activist Emmaia Gelman wrote in theBoston Reviewin 2019 that the ADL has conducted a "vigorous, and successful campaign, alongsideAIPAC,specifically to characterize Arab American political organizing as dual loyalty. "She wrote that the ADL's role in anti-hate efforts had insulated it from deserved scrutiny, and that it had undermined the American left including some black-led groups in such efforts.

Internal dissent over ADL leadership

Yael Eisenstat, head of the ADL's Center for Technology and Society (CTS), said she was resigning in 2024 to refocus her work on election protection, though an anonymous ADL staffer said the real reason for her departure was objection to Greenblatt's praise of billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk. Eisenstat's announcement followed the resignation of three other CTS employees who disagreed with ADL post-October 7th policies targeting pro-Palestine activism rather than antisemitism.

Accusations of Islamophobia and anti-Palestinianism

The ADL considers criticism of Zionism to be anti-Semitic.According toThe Nation's Joshua Leifer, this stance, in part, positions the ADL as "an anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian outfit",whileEli Pariserhas said ADL's support for the prohibition of the anti-Zionist slogan"from the river to the sea"on social media is" both morally wrong and disastrously counterproductive ".ADL staff have also criticized the ADL's leadership for equating Palestinian opposition to Zionism with anti-Semitism, while a former regional development director for the group has claimed that it is "willing to throw... Palestinians under the bus" in order to maximize fundraising.

In 2022, the ADL's CEO denounced Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine as the "photo inverse of the extreme right that the ADL has long tracked", a statement that was in turn denounced by more than 50 American Muslim and civil rights groups.Two years later, in 2024, the ADL asserted thatStudents for Justice in Palestine(SJP) had violated federal law concerning material support for Hamas, a statement that bothThe NationandThe Interceptobserved was made without any evidence.The SJP responded by stating that "rather than combating [authoritarianism and racism] and organizing for genuine social justice, the ADL has leveraged Islamophobia, anti-Arab sentiment, and conservatism to delegitimize the movement for Palestine liberation".The ADL's claims against the SJP were criticized by theACLUwhich contended they "chill speech, foster an atmosphere of mutual suspicion, and betray the spirit of free inquiry".CAIRissued a public condemnation of the ADL for "slandering... Palestinian students"and, the same year, a coalition ofHarvard Universitystudent groups denounced ADL leadership as racist against Palestinians and the organization itself as "widely discredited".Hussam Ayloush, the executive director of CAIR's Los Angeles office, has said that the ADL "contributes to the growth and rise of Islamophobia in America".

In 2024, according toGeorgetown University's Bridge Initiative, the ADL's CEO "vilified the Palestinian people by making an offensive analogy between the Palestinian keffiyeh and the Nazi swastika".

"Drop the ADL" campaign

In August 2020, a coalition of progressive organizations launched the "Drop the ADL" campaign, arguing that "the ADL is not an ally" in social justice work. The campaign consisted of an open letter and a website, which were shared on social media with thehashtag"#DropTheADL". Notable signatories included theDemocratic Socialists of America,Movement for Black Lives,Jewish Voice for Peace,Center for Constitutional Rights,andCouncil on American–Islamic Relations.The open letter stated that the ADL "has a history and ongoing pattern of attacking social justice movements led by communities of color,queerpeople, immigrants, Muslims, Arabs, and other marginalized groups, while aligning itself with police, right-wing leaders, and perpetrators of state violence. "Some liberal groups responded by defending the ADL, withHIASCEO Mark Hetfield characterizing Drop the ADL as a "smear campaign". The ADL published a statement that the campaign involved "many of the same groups who have been pushing an anti-Israel agenda for years."Around sixty organizations supported the campaign on its initial launch, and an additional hundred groups had joined by February 2021.

Wikipedia determination of unreliability on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

See also:Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

In June 2024, thecommunityof theEnglish Wikipediareached a consensus that the ADL was "generally unreliable" on the topic of theIsraeli–Palestinian conflict,including "the intersection of antisemitism and the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, such as labeling pro-Palestinian activists as antisemitic".The community's discussion on the ADL's reliability began in April 2024 and involved over 120 volunteer editors.

Prior to June 2024, the ADL was considered a generally reliable source, though some editors considered it a biased source on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict that "should be used with caution, if at all" on the topic.

Discussion and determination

Informal discussion among Wikipedia editors about the reliability of the ADL started on March 25, 2024.On April 6, a formal discussion began about the suitability of the ADL as a source for use on Wikipedia in relation to three subjects: the Israeli–Palestinian conflict,antisemitism,and the organization's Hate Symbols Database. The discussion ultimately involved more than 120 editors.

In June 2024, theEnglish Wikipediacommunity determined the ADL was "generally unreliable" on the topic of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.A Wikipedia administrator who evaluated the community's discussion to determine its result cited the existence of substantial evidence of the ADL acting as a "pro-Israeli advocacy group" that has published unretracted misinformation "to the point that it taints their reputation for accuracy and fact checking regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict", as well as a "habit on the ADL's part of conflating criticism of the Israeli government's actions with antisemitism".Later that month, the Wikipedia community concluded the ADL's lack of reliability extended to "the intersection of antisemitism and the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, such as labeling pro-Palestinian activists as antisemitic", but "the ADL can roughly be taken as reliable on the topic of antisemitism when Israel and Zionism are not concerned".The community also concluded that the ADL's hate symbol database was "reliable for the existence of a symbol and for straightforward facts about it, but not reliable for more complex details, such as symbols’ history".

Response by the ADL

The ADL condemned the initial decision, alleging it was part of a "campaign to delegitimize" the organization. The ADL opined that editors opposing the ban "provided point by point refutations, grounded in factual citations, to every claim made, but apparently facts no longer matter."In a later interview on the subject withMSNBC'sMorning Joe,CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said the decision was the result of a "small group of people [who] take a political position, and they're not accountable".The decision was also criticized by over 40 Jewish organizations, includingJewish Federations of North America,B'nai B'rith InternationalandHIAS.In a letter coordinated by the ADL and sent to theWikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees,the organizations stated "As leading Jewish communal organizations, we express our concern and dismay by Wikipedia's attack on ADL's reliability on the topic of antisemitism and other issues of central concern to the Jewish community."The letter also called for the foundation to "immediately launch an investigation into this decision" and to reconsider it.

On June 25, 2024, the Wikimedia Foundation issued a preliminary statement in response to the letter, stating that the groups' call for an "investigation" and action by the foundation represented "a misunderstanding of the situation and how Wikipedia works".The foundation, at the time, said it was still considering a fuller response that would help "raise more understanding with these groups about how Wikipedia works".A press release issued the following day by the foundation stated that "... the Foundation has not, and does not, intervene in decisions made by the community about the classification of a source".

Reaction

Analysis

James LoefflerofJohns Hopkins University,a professor of modern Jewish history, commented that the Wikipedia editors were "heavily influenced by the ADL leadership's comments", which took "a much more aggressive stance than most academic researchers in blurring the distinction between anti-Zionism and antisemitism".Loeffler also said that the English Wikipedia's decision was a "significant hit" to the credibility of the ADL.Dov Waxman,professor of Israel Studies, said that if "Wikipedia and other sources and the journalists start ignoring the ADL's data, it becomes a real issue for Jewish Americans who are understandably concerned about the rise of antisemitism".The Independentcalled it a "major blow" to the ADL.CNNcalled it "a stunning rebuke to one of the world's preeminent authorities on anti-Jewish hate and a significant advocate for the rights and causes of American Jews."

Commentary

Mira Sucharov ofCarleton Universitysaid the decision was "a sign that the Jewish community needs better institutions".Writing inThe Forward,senior columnist Rob Eshman opined that the determination by Wikipedia that the ADL was generally unreliable was a "wake-up call" the organization "badly needs" and that it "must do better".In a statement in response to the decision,Jewish Voice for Peaceaccused the ADL of lying and said "thank you Wikipedia".In an editorial column forJewish News Syndicate,Jonathan S. Tobinjuxtaposed the Wikipedia community's decision with the ADL's prior advocacy for content moderation on social media, writing that "... the ADL's pro-censorship chickens have come home to roost".Commenting during an episode ofThe Hill'sRising,Robby Soavesaid, "I agree with the Wikipedia editors on this — I find the organization to be unreliable some of the time".

See also

• American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
• Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
• Defamation(film)
• Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation
• Israel lobby in the United States
• Jewish Council for Public Affairs
• Membership discrimination in California social clubs
• Simon Wiesenthal Center
• Conseil Représentatif des Institutions juives de France

External links

• Official website