Aureoluswas aRomanmilitary commanderduring the reign of EmperorGallienusbefore he attempted to usurp theRoman Empire.After turning against Gallienus, Aureolus was killed during the political turmoil that surrounded the Emperor's assassination in a conspiracy orchestrated by his senior officers. Aureolus is known as one of theThirty Tyrantsand is referenced in ancient sources including theHistoria Augusta,[1]Zonaras' epitome[2]andZosimus'Historia Nova.[3][4]
| Aureolus | |
|---|---|
| Usurperof theRoman Empire | |
 Aureolus fromPromptuarii Iconum Insigniorum | |
| Reign | 268 (againstGallienus) |
| Born | 220–230(?) Dacia |
| Died | 268 Mediolanum,Italy |
Biography
editEarly life
editAurelous was born in theRoman province of Dacia,north of theDanube,and prior to his military career served as a herdsman[5]as well as Master of the Imperial Horses ('Phronistes').[2]Hisnomenis often reported as Acilius, while hispraenomenis thought to be eitherMarcusorManius,[6]both of which were common praenomina within theAcilia gens.Although some historians such asJohn Platts,William A'Beckett and Angelo Paredi have thought the 'M' to stand for a second nomenManlius.[7][8][9]
It is unclear whether Aurelous came to the attention of the Emperor Gallienus after enlisting in the army, or during his service as a groom. Gallienus was known to promote talent from outside the establishment, and Aureolus was one of the New Men who replaced senators in positions of high command in the army in the course of his reign.
Career
editAs a former Imperial Horsemaster, Aureolus developed a self-contained cavalry force to increase the effectiveness of thecomitatusas a highly mobile field army under the Emperor's direct control. Aureolus was the first commander of this force under the Emperor, and was based atMediolanum(Milan).[10]
Aureolus' cavalry was principally responsible for the defeat of the usurperIngenuusat the Battle ofMursa(Osijek) in 258. In 261, he commanded the force which defeated the army of the usurpersMacrianus MajorandMacrianus Minorin battle somewhere in the central Balkans. The army of the Macriani, which first supported usurper Ingenuus and thenRegalianus,included inmates from garrisons inDanubian provincesand was estimated to be at least 30,000 strong.
The success of Aureolus in suppressing the Macriani is thought by some historians to have undermined the achievements of Gallienus. Other historians suggest that at this time Gallienus was attempting to crush the Gallic usurperPostumus,who murdered Gallienus's son CaesarSaloninus,and clear theJuthungiout of the Alpine province ofRaetiawhere they posed a direct threat to Italy and Rome.
Rebellion
editAfter the Macriani were defeated and the Danubian garrison forces who had supported them were pacified, Aureolus and the Emperor united to defeat Postumus and hisGallic Empire.It may have been as a result of this campaign that the province ofRaetiawas recovered from the Gallic Empire and Postumus's inscription on the Augsburg Altar was erased.[11]However, Postumus managed to evade complete defeat, which some historians blame on the alleged 'carelessness' of Aureolus. Other historians have suggested that Aureolus deliberately allowed the Gallic usurper to evade destruction to see Gallienus displaced as Emperor.
Zosimus[3]reported that Aureolus and two other officers conspired against Gallienus, but that all of them were punished and submitted, except Aureolus, who retained his anger against the emperor. The reasons for this are unknown, though it is speculated that as a Dacian Aureolus resented Gallienus for using the Dacian garrison to reinforce his field army for the defence of Italy, compounding the problems of barbarian incursions into Dacia. Despite his failure to destroy Postumus in Gaul, Aureolus was given sole responsibility for the campaign against the Macriani. However, when theGothsandHerulsinvaded the Danubian provinces with an enormous force in 268, Aureolus was not even a senior officer of the Imperialcomitatusthat accompanied the Emperor against the marauders. He was instead made commander of the Raetian garrison while his cavalry went east with the Emperor under the command of Claudius (later the EmperorClaudius Gothicus) orAurelian,who also became Emperor in due course.
Losing command of the elite cavalry is thought to have been a humiliating demotion for Aureolus, who deserted his Alpine command and invaded Italy and took his old base at Mediolanum. Thistreasoncaused Gallienus to break off his campaign against the Goths in the Balkans at a most critical moment to return to Italy to deal with Aureolus. Historians believe the longer-term consequences of Aureolus' rebellion opened Raetia to further invasion by theAlamanniwho then went on to raid Italy itself in the early months of the reign ofClaudius Gothicus.It may have been at this time that theAgri Decumates,the Roman lands north-east of the upper Rhine, were lost to the Empire.
From Mediolanum, Aureolus invited Postumus to challenge Gallienus for the Empire with his support. Using the Imperial mint in Mediolanum, Aureolus had coins struck bearing Postumus's image as Emperor with appeals to the faith of his former comrades of the cavalry on the reverse. Postumus ignored his invitation and Aureolus, unsupported by the Gallic usurper, was defeated by Gallienus in a battle on the riverAddaeast of Milan at a place known for centuries asPontirolo(from LatinPons Aureolii.e. 'The Bridge of Aureolus'). He was then besieged in Mediolanum by Gallienus' militarycomitatus,including the cavalry which Aureolus had created.
Death
editFollowing the conspiracy by the Praetorian Prefect, together withAurelius Heraclianus,ClaudiusandAurelianwhich saw Gallienus murdered, Aureolus as one of theThirty Tyrantsis thought to have attempted to take power himself.
Aureolus surrendered to Claudius Gothicus, who succeeded Gallienus as Emperor. Before Claudius could decide his sentence, Aureolus was murdered by Claudius'Praetorian Guardas revenge for his rebellion against Gallienus.
References
edit- ^Magie, D., ed. (1953).Scriptores Historiae Augustae (Historia Augusta), 3 vols.London: Heinemann.
- ^abDindorf, L., ed. (1870).Zonaras, 'Epitome Historiarum'.Leipzig: Teubner.
- ^abMendelssohn, ed. (1967).Zozimus, 'Historia Nova'.Translated by Buchanan, J.; Davis, H.T. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press.
- ^Bray, John (1997).Gallienus: A study in reformist and sexual politics.Adelaide: Wakefield Press.
- ^Zonaras, Op. Cit. xii, 24.
- ^Vagi, David L. (2000).Coinage and History of the Roman Empire, C. 82 B.C.–A.D. 480: History.Vol. 1 (illustrated ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 389.ISBN9781579583163.
- ^Platts, John (1825).A New Universal Biography, Containing Interesting Accounts.Vol. 2. Sherwood, Jones, and Company. p. 184.
- ^A'Beckett, William (1836).A Universal Biography: Including Scriptural, Classical and Mytological Memoirs, Together with Accounts of Many Eminent Living Characters: the Whole Newly Compiled and Composed from the Most Recent and Authentic Sources; in Three Volumes.Vol. 1. Isaac, Tuckey, and Company. p. 295.
- ^Paredi, Angelo (1964).Saint Ambrose: His Life and Times.University of Notre Dame Press. p. 98.ISBN9780268002398.
- ^Strobel, Karl (2007),"Strategy and Army Structure Between Septimius Severus and Constantine the Great",A Companion to the Roman Army,John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 267–285,doi:10.1002/9780470996577.ch16,ISBN978-0-470-99657-7,retrieved2021-12-10
- ^RJB (2003)."Gallic Consuls".Forum Ancient Coins.