TheBofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60(often referred to simply as the"Bofors 40 mm gun",the"Bofors gun"and the like,[3][4]seename) is ananti-aircraftautocannon,designed in the 1930s by the Swedish arms manufacturer ABBofors.The gun was designed as an intermediate anti-aircraft gun, filling the gap between fast firing close-range small calibre anti-aircraft guns and slower firing long-range high calibre anti-aircraft guns. For its time, the Bofors 40 mm L/60 was perfectly suited for this role and outperformed competing designs in the years leading up toWorld War IIin both effectiveness and reliability.[5][3]

Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60
TypeAutocannon
Place of originSweden
Service history
In service1934–present
Used bySeeUsers
WarsSeeWars
Production history
DesignerAB Bofors
Designed1930
ManufacturerBofors Defence (1932–2000)
Zastava Arms(1970–present)
Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur(1960-present)
United DefenseIndustries (2000–2006)
BAE Systems AB(2006–present)
Produced1932–present
No.built>60,000 (L/60)[1]
VariantsSeevariants
Specifications (L/60)
Barrellength2.25 m (7 ft 5 in)
Crew4[2](dependent on use)

Shell40 × 311 mm R
Shellweight0.9 kg (2 lb 0 oz)
Caliber40 mm
Barrels1 or 2[2]
ActionAutomatic extractionand integratedcam-operatedrecoilpoweredautoloader
BreechVerticalsliding-wedge
Carriage522 kg (1,151 lb)
Elevation−5°/+90°, 55°/s
TraverseFull 360°, 50°/s
Rate of fire140 round/min at low elevation angles
120 round/min at high elevation angles
Muzzle velocity850–880 m/s (2,800–2,900 ft/s)[a]
Maximum firing range7,160 m (23,490 ft)

It entered the export market around 1932[5]and was in service with 18 countries by 1939.[6]Throughout World War II it became one of the most popular and widespread medium-weight anti-aircraft guns. It was used by the majority of the westernAlliesand someAxis powerssuch as Nazi Germany and Hungary.

In the post-war era, the Bofors 40 mm L/60 design was not suitable for action against jet-powered aircraft, so Bofors developed a new 40 mm replacement design with significantly more power—theBofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/70,also known under the generic name 'Bofors 40 mm gun'—which was adopted by many nations during the Cold War and was selected as NATO-standard in November 1953.[7]The Bofors 40 mm L/60 would however continue to see service long after becoming obsolete as an anti-aircraft weapon due to the massive number of surplus guns from WWII, and a small number of Bofors 40 mm L/60 guns remain in service today. Some weapons saw action as late as theGulf WarandYugoslav Wars.

Name

edit

The Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60 is known under a variety of names around the world. In common historical nomenclatures it is commonly known under the namesBofors 40 mm gun,40 mm Bofors gunandBofors gun.[3]This mostly stems fromWestern Alliedusage of the gun during World War II. For example, British anti-air batteries armed with the gun during the war received the nickname "The Bofors Boys".[8]There were other guns by Bofors which also had these nicknames, the most common being theBofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/70,leading some to think they are the same gun.

Boforsitself never marketed the gun or its variants with a clear standardized name or abbreviation.[9][10][11]In the vast majority of 1930s marketing material the gun is sold under a variety of descriptive names depending on the configuration, such as: "40 mm Automatic Field Gun L/60" to "40 mm Automatic A.A. Gun L/60 in Field Carriage" or "40 mm Automatic Naval Gun L/60" to "40 mm Automatic A.A. Gun L/60 in Naval Mounting". This theme transfers over to other languages as well:Swedish:40 mm fältautomatkanon L/60,German:40 mm feldluftautomatkanone L/60,[9]Spanish:Cañón automatico de campaña de 40 mm L/60 Bofors.[12]Only thecaliberof 40 mm andcaliber lengthof L/60 are somewhat universal in branding.

Due to this the gun is often specified by the calibre length "L/60".[13][page needed]Enthusiasts and experts usually call the gun "Bofors 40 mm L/60"[4]or simply "Bofors 40/60" and the like.[14][15][16]In some Bofors material the gun is standardized under the English name "Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60".[10][17]

Calibre length

edit

Contrary to the name, the Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60 has an actualbarrel lengthof 56.25 calibres – 2,250 mm (7 ft 5 in). Due to this, the gun can at times be found under the designationL/56.[18]TheL/60calibre length – 2,400 mm (94 in) – refers to the length of the barrel andbreechmounted as a unit.[19]The gun has also been cited with a caliber length ofL/62on occasion. This refers to the length of the barrel – 2,250 mm – when equipped with the conical flash hider – 250 mm (9.8 in); amounting to a length of 2,500 mm (8 ft 2 in), or 62.5 calibres.[20]

Similarly, the shorterL/43calibre length – 1,720 mm (5 ft 8 in) – refers to the length of the barrel and breech mounted as a unit.[20]The actual barrel length is 1,570 mm (5 ft 2 in) – 39.25 calibres.[20]With a flash hider or muzzle brake mounted the barrel length becomes 1,740 mm (5 ft 9 in)[20]or 1,760 mm (5 ft 9 in).[21]

Development

edit

In 1922, theSwedish Navypurchased a number of 40 mm2-pounder "pom-poms"fromVickersas anti-aircraft guns. The navy approached Bofors about the development of a more capable replacement, and Bofors signed a contract in late 1928. The company produced a gun that was a smaller version of a 57 mm (6-pounder) semi-automatic gun, developed as an anti-torpedo boatweapon in the late 19th century byFinspång.Bofors' first test gun was a re-barrelledNordenfeltversion of the Finspång gun, to which was added a semi-automatic loading mechanism.

Testing of the gun in 1929 showed that a problem existed with feeding the weapon to maintain a reasonable rate of fire. A mechanism that was strong enough to handle the stresses of moving the largeroundwas too heavy to operate quickly enough to fire rapidly. One attempt to solve the problem usedzincshell cases that burned up when fired. However, that left heavy zinc deposits in the barrel and had to be abandoned. In the summer of 1930, experiments were conducted with a new test gun that did away with controlled feed and instead flicked the spent casing out the rear, after which a second mechanism reloaded the gun by "throwing" a fresh round into the open breech from the magazine. That improved firing rates to an acceptable level, so work on a prototype commenced soon after.

During that period,Krupppurchased a one-third share of Bofors. Krupp engineers began the process of updating the Bofors factories with modern equipment and metallurgy, but the 40 mm project was kept secret.

Finnish Bofors 40 mm. This gun mounts the original reflector sights, and lacks the gun shield found on British examples

The prototype was completed and fired in November 1931 and, by the middle of the month, it was firing strings of two and three rounds. Changes to the feed mechanism were all that remained and, by the end of the year, the gun was operating at 130 rounds per minute. The development needed to turn it into a weapon suitable for production was completed in October 1933. Because acceptance trials had been passed the year before, it became known as the "40 mm akan M/32". Most forces referred to it as the "Bofors 40 mm L/60", although the barrel was actually 56.25calibresin length, not the 60 calibres that the name implied.[citation needed]

The gun fired a 900 g (2.0 lb)high explosiveshell at 2,960 ft/s (900 m/s) from a 40 × 311 rimmed cartridge.[22]The rate of fire was normally about 120 rounds per minute (2 rounds per second), which increased slightly when the barrels were closer to the horizon, because gravity assisted the feeding from the top-mounted magazine. Practical firing rates were closer to 80–100 rpm, because the rounds were fed into the breech from four round clips which had to be replaced by hand. The maximum attainable ceiling was 7,200 m (23,600 ft), but the practical maximum was about 3,800 m (12,500 ft).

The gun was provided with an advanced sighting system. The trainer and layer were both provided withreflector sightsfor aiming, while a third crew-member, standing behind them, "adjusted" for lead using a simple mechanical computer. Power for the sights was supplied from a 6Vbattery.

British 40mm L/60 with Stiffkey Sight, being operated by the gun layer standing on the right. The layer operates the trapeze seen above the sights, moving them to adjust for lead. The loader stands to the layer's left, and the two trainer/aimers are sitting on either side of the gun.

In spite of the successful development, the Swedish Navy changed its mind and decided it needed a smaller hand-traversed weapon of 13 mm-25 mm size, and tested various designs from foreign suppliers. With the development of the 40 mm well advanced, Bofors offered a 25 mm version in 1932, which was eventually selected as theBofors 25 mm M/32.

The first version of the 40 mm the Swedish Navy ordered was intended for use on submarines, because the larger calibre allowed the gun to be used both as an anti-aircraft gun, and against smaller ships. The barrel was shorter, at 43 calibres, which reduced the muzzle velocity to about 700 m/s (2,300 ft/s). When not in use, the gun was pointed directly up and retracted into a watertight cylinder. The only known submarines that used that arrangement were theSjölejonet-classboats. The guns were later removed when the submarines were modified with streamlined conning towers.

The first order for the "real" L/60 was made by theDutch Navy,which ordered five twin-gun mounts for thecruiserDe Ruyterin August 1934. Those guns were stabilized using theHazemeyer mount,in which one set of layers aimed the gun, while a second manually stabilized the platform the gun sat on. All five mounts were operated by one fire-control system.

Bofors also developed a towable carriage, which was displayed at a show in Belgium in April 1935. That mount allowed the gun to be fired from the carriage with no set-up required, although it had limited accuracy. If time was available for set-up, the gunners used the tow-bar and muzzle lock as levers, raising the wheels off the ground and so lowering the gun onto supporting pads. Two additional legs folded out to the sides, and the platform was then levelled with hand cranks. The entire set-up process could be completed in under a minute.

Orders for the land-based versions were immediate, starting with one for eight weapons from Belgium in August 1935, followed by a flood of orders from other forces including Poland, Norway, and Finland.[23]It was accepted into theSwedish Armythe next year, and known as the "40 mm lvakan m/36", the lower-case "m" indicating an army model as opposed to the capital "M" for the navy.

Licensed production

edit

Within a few years AB Bofors received number of orders, but more importantly at that time, a number of foreign governments negotiated for licensed production of the gun and its ammunition. These nations included Poland, Finland, Greece, Norway and many other countries. Thus by 1939 Bofors gun was in production all over Europe for many armies in bewildering arrangement of cross-deals. For instance, the United Kingdom took out a license, but was in such a hurry to re-arm with the Bofors gun that it also purchased quantities from Poland and Hungary. France wanted to set up a line but purchased guns from Poland. Poland meanwhile developed its own version of Bofors gun, contributing a lighter carriage (in the 40-mm armata przeciwlotnicza Bofors wz. 36) which was later adopted by the British.

The Swedish navy adopted the weapon as the m/36 in two versions: hand-worked single air-cooled, and power-operated twin water-cooled. A twin air-cooled mounting, probably hand-worked, was also used by the navies of Sweden and Argentina, and a twin air-cooled wet mounting was developed for Polish submarines.

British versions

edit

Army and RAF Regiment versions

edit
Q.F. 40 mm Mk. 1 displayed atCFB Borden.This example mounts a Stiffkey Sight, and displays the additional armor protecting the gunners
Bofors gun on theLey-classminehunterHMSIsis(1978)

TheBritish Armyhad first examined the weapon in 1937, when it received a number of Polish-built examples for testing. They were known as the "QF 40 mm Mark I" (QF standing for"quick firing"). With a minor change to theflash hider,they were designated "Mark I/2". A production licence was acquired, and the gun was converted frommetrictoimperialmeasurements. Numerous changes were made to the design so that it was more suitable for mass production, because the original Bofors design was intended to be hand-assembled. Many parts were labelled "file to fit on assembly", requiring many man-hours of work to complete.

Testing showed that there was a serious problem with aiming the gun at high-speed aircraft. Although it could be trained quickly, aiming accurately while doing so proved difficult. In order to deal with that, the British introduced a complexmechanical analogue computer,theKerrison Director,which drove the laying electrically. A three-man team operated the director by pointing it at the target whilst dialing in estimates for speed, range, and various atmospheric conditions. The director then aimed the gun using powered mounts, while a gunner loaded the clips. That eliminated the need for the lead-correcting reflector sights, which were replaced with a backup system consisting of a simple ring-and-post sight, known as a "pancake".

In that form, the "QF 40 mm Mark III" (Mk II was a designation used fora version of the naval "pom-pom"anti-aircraft gun), became the army's standard light anti-aircraft (AA) weapon, operating alongside their3-inch 20 cwtand3.7-inchheavy AA guns. British production started slowly and, by September 1939 only 233 equipments had been produced. However, by the end of the war, the total production of British, Canadian and Australian factories numbered over 19,000. The peak production year was 1942, when British factories produced 5,025 and Canadian factories produced 1,311.[24]

In combat, it was found that the Kerrison was difficult to set up in many situations, as well as makinglogisticsmore complex, due to the need to keep its electrical generator supplied with fuel. In most engagements, only the pancake sights were used, without any form of correction, making the British versions less capable than those used by other forces. Eventually, an anti-aircraft gunnery school on the range atStiffkeyon theNorfolkcoast, delivered a workable solution, a trapeze-like arrangement that moved the pancake sights to offer lead correction, operated by a new crew-member standing behind the left-hand layer. The "Stiffkey Sight" was sent out to units in 1943, arriving in Canadian units in the midst of theBattle of the Aleutian Islands.A final wartime change to the elevation mechanism resulted in the "QF 40 mm Mark XII". A much lighter, two-wheeled carriage was also developed forairborneuse.

The army experimented with variousself-propelled anti-aircraft gunsbased on varioustankchassis. Changes to the breech for that role created the "QF 40 mm Mark VI", which was used on theCrusader tankto produce theCrusader III AA Mark I.The main self-propelled version of the Bofors was the gun mounted on a chassis derived from theMorris C8"Quad" artillery tractor, which was known as the "Carrier, 30 cwt, SP, 4×4, 40 mm AA (Bofors)" or Morris-Commercial C9/B. Such guns were used in support of army divisions, to provide swift protection against air attack without the need to unlimber. They saw service in north-west Europe, where six SP Bofors of 92nd (Loyals) Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Royal Artillery, landed with theBritish 3rd Infantry DivisiononSword Beachon D-Day, to protect the vital bridges over theCaen Canaland theOrne River(Pegasus BridgeandHorsa Bridge), shooting down 17 German planes. Later in the campaign, SP Bofors were used extensively for ground shoots as well as in an anti-aircraft role.

In British Army service, the Bofors found a highly specialised role: during theNorth Africa campaign,at theSecond Battle of El Alamein,they were used to firetracerhorizontally to mark safe paths for units through the German minefields. That practice was further developed during operations in north-west Europe, where bursts of colour-coded tracer were used to define the axis of advance of different formations in large-scale night attacks.

TheRAF Regimentwas formed in February 1942, in response to the German capture of airfields with airborne troops in theBattle of Crete,which resulted in strategic defeat on the island by numerically inferior German forces. The formation of a dedicated airfield defence force included low-level air defence, in which the Bofors L60 — the same design as the Army version — was the principal weapon for the RAF Regiment's Light Anti-Aircraft squadrons in North Africa, Malta, Italy, the Balkans, the UK (including the allocation of fifty-two squadrons toOperation Diverdefence against V-1 flying bombs in southern England), and north-western Europe (fromNormandy landingsthrough to the cessation of hostilities).

No 2875 Squadron RAF Regiment, employing the L60, became the first unit to shoot down a jet aircraft, aMesserschmitt Me 262,with ground-based anti-aircraft fire, atHelmondin the Netherlands on 28 November 1944. Although the Allied air forces had achieved air superiority by the Normandy landings,Advanced Landing Groundscontinued to be high-priority targets for the Luftwaffe when the opportunity presented, and that ensured that the RAF Regiment's L60s continued to be heavily used. For example, on New Year's Day 1945, during theBattle of the Bulge,RAF Regiment Light Anti-Aircraft squadrons shot down 43 German aircraft and damaged 28 others during theOperation Bodenplatteattacks on eleven RAF forward airfields. There were insufficient guns available to equip the RAF Regiment squadrons in the Far East during the war, and they had to make do mostly with20 mm HispanoandOerlikon 20 mmguns.[citation needed]

A Light Anti-Aircraft field regiment (one with each infantry division) had 54 Bofors guns.[25]

After World War II, the RAF Regiment continued to employ the L60 as its principal anti-aircraft weapon until it was replaced by the L70 gun in 1957. The guns were deployed in the UK, Germany, Cyprus, the Middle East, and the Far East.

edit
Single Bofors 40 mm Boffin mounting, displayed atCFB Borden.In 1996, museum pieces like this cannon were pressed back into service as the main armament of theKingston-class minesweepers.[26]

TheRoyal Navyalso made extensive use of the Bofors. Its first examples were air-cooled versions quickly adapted for ships during thewithdrawal from Norway.After theGerman invasion of the Netherlandsin May 1940, the Dutch minelayer,HNLMSWillem van der Zaan,gave the navy its first example of a water-cooled gun on its Hazemeyer tri-axially stabilized mounting. Locally produced examples started arriving in 1942, known as the "QF 40 mm Mark IV" with twin-mounts, or the "QF 40 mm Mark V" with single mounts. The navy ran through a variety of versions of the basic Bofors gun over the war, including the Mark VII to Mark XI. The British light anti-aircraft weapon already in use with the Royal Navy's, theQF 2-pounder gun,also had a calibre of 40 mm, but was referred to as the QF 2-pdr.

In the Royal Navy guns and mounts were designated separately. The following mountings were used:

  • Mark I: twin mounting based on American design and using American-built guns, not widely fitted. Fitted for remotefire control.
  • Mark II: quadruple version similar to the Mark I
  • Mark III: a navalized version of the Army single mounting, hand worked elevation and training.
  • Mark IV: a tri-axially stabilized twin mounting, copied from, and usually known as, the "Hazemeyer". It had on-mounting fire control, and was usually fitted with Radar Type 282 to provide target range information.
  • Mark V: twin mounting, which superseded, and eventually replaced, the Mark IV, often referred to as the "utility" mounting. It was a simplified, unstabilised mounting based on the American twin mounting Mark I, and was designed for remote fire control.
  • Mark VI: a six-barreled weapon, feeding from large trays instead of clips, and designed for remote control from a dedicated radar-equipped director.
  • Mark VII: a single-barreled, hydraulically-powered mounting, that superseded the Mark III and entered service in 1945.
  • Mark IX: Mark VII mount modified for electrical power, as the Mounting Mark IX and, in that form, saw service in theFalklands War.

The Mounting Mark V (Mark VC for Canadian built examples) for the 20 mm Oerlikon and QF 2 pounder guns was also adopted initially as an interim mount for the Bofors. It was a single-barrelled mounting with hydraulic power, and was known as the "Boffin".

The final British Bofors mounting to see service was the "Stabilized Tachymetric Anti-Aircraft Gun" (STAAG), which was twin-barrelled, stabilised, and carried its owntachymetric(i.e. predictive) fire control system, based around the centimetre Radar Type 262, capable of "locking on" to a target. The mounting was heavy (17.5 tons) and the high-vibration of the gun mounting made it a poor location for sensitive valve electronics and mechanical computers. The STAAG Mark I carried the radar dish over the gun barrels, where it was subject to damage during firing so, on the STAAG Mark II, the set was shifted to the roof of the control cabin. STAAG was ultimately too difficult to maintain in the harsh environment of a warship and was replaced by the Mounting Mark V, with the fire control equipment located remotely, then by the single Mark VII and, ultimately, with theGWS20 Seacat missile system.The final version of STAAG was fitted to the RNType 12Whitby-classanti-submarine frigates and theType 41Leopardanti-aircraft andType 61Salisburyair direction frigates, completed from 1956 to 1958. The cruiserRoyalistwas also fitted with the STAAG Mk 2 during modernisation before transfer to the RNZN in the 1950s. Initially, it had three STAAG CIWS, the STAAG in Q position was removed in 1960, but it carried two mounts until the end of its service inSoutheast Asianwaters, in 1965. In 1956 during theSuez Crisis,the crew ofRoyalistseemed to find the STAAG a reasonably effective anti-aircraft weapon inOperation Musketeer.

U.S. versions

edit

Manufacturing

edit

In order to supply both the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy with much greater numbers of the guns,Chryslerbuilt 60,000 of the guns and 120,000 barrels through the war,[1]at half the original projected cost, and filling the Army's needs by 1943.[27]Over the lifetime of the production, their engineers introduced numerous changes to improve mass production, eventually halving the overall time needed to build a gun. Most of the changes were in production methods rather than the design of the gun itself: for example, milling from steel block was replaced by stampings and castings whenever possible, and Amplex division of Chrysler (which normally manufactured oilite) produced nine parts bysintering.[27][28]York Safe & Lock also produced the weapons, though its attempts to coordinate drawings across the program were unsuccessful, and this responsibility was transferred to theNaval Gun Factoryin July 1943.[29]

There were many difficulties in producing the guns within the United States, beyond their complexity (2,000 subcontractors in 330 cities and 12 Chrysler factories were used to make and assemble the parts). The drawings were metric, in Swedish, with loose tolerances for hand fitting and read from thefirst angle of projection.Chrysler had to translate to imperial measures and English language, fix absolute dimensions, and mirror/reorder the drawings to the third angle of projection. Chrysler engineers also tried to simplify the gun, unsuccessfully, and to take high-speed movies to find possible improvements, but this was not possible until near the end of the war.[27]

Swedish blueprints had many notes on them such as "file to fit at assembly" and "drill to fit at assembly," all of which took much production time in order to implement. Thirdly, the Swedish mountings were manually worked, while the USN required power-worked mountings in order to attain the fast elevation and training speeds necessary to engage modern aircraft. Fourthly, the Swedish guns were air-cooled, limiting their ability to fire long bursts, a necessity for most naval AA engagements. Finally, the USN rejected the Swedish ammunition design, as it was not boresafe, the fuze was found to be too sensitive for normal shipboard use and its overall design was determined to be unsuitable for mass production.[4][29]

edit
A MK 12 quadruple mount of Bofors guns fires fromUSSHornet

TheUnited States Navy'sBureau of Ordnancepurchased a twin-mount air-cooled example, spare parts and 3,000 rounds of ammunition directly from Bofors, which arrived in New York on 28 August 1940 aboard the Army transportUSATAmerican Legion,which had evacuated 897 people, including members of the Norwegian royal family, through the Finnish port ofPetsamo.[30]During that month another Dutch ship, theVan Kinsbergen,demonstrated the Hazemeyer mount to Navy observers. The gun was quickly chosen as the Navy's standard anti-aircraft weapon over the British 40 mm calibre,2-pounder pom-pom;however, negotiations with Bofors for licensed production stalled when the Swedes requested airplane export and manufacturing licenses in return.[29]Reportedly, the Navy secretly imported a set ofimperialdesigns from Britain and started production illegally. A formal contract with Bofors was reached in June 1941. The resulting Mark 1 and Mark 2 weapons were intended for the left and right side of a twin mount, respectively, and were adapted by Chrysler for water cooling.[27]

A twin Bofors 40 mm atPatriots Point

Following theattack on Pearl Harboron 7 December 1941, the existing1.1 "(28 mm) quad mountand.50 caliber machine gunswere determined to be inadequate against modern aircraft, and their replacement by 40 mm Bofors and20 mm Oerlikonweapons was accelerated. The water-cooled version was used almost exclusively by the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard. The 40 mm quadruple mount was developed by essentially mounting two twin mounts side by side.[29]A major improvement was the addition of power operation to both twin and quadruple mounts. Essentially all US naval mountings were twin or quadruple. 40 mm weapons were eventually mounted on virtually every naval and armed auxiliary vessel larger than a small landing craft.[29]After the war, the3 "/50 caliber gunMark 27 twin mount began to replace the Bofors, because the "VT"proximity fusewould not fit a 40mm projectile, and the 40 mm weapon was considered inadequate against the emerginganti-ship missilethreat. The twin 3 "mount was intended to be the same weight as the 40mm quad mount, but was somewhat heavier in practice, which had to be compensated for. Except on destroyers and new construction, the Navy was slow in phasing out the 40 mm gun, and it continued in active Navy service through the Korean War. It remained on inactiveReserve fleetships at least through the early 1970s.[31]

The Navy's satisfaction with the weapons was demonstrated by their practice of telegraphing Chrysler Corporation with the serial numbers of guns when they shot down an aircraft.[27]

Army

edit
U.S. Army 40-mm Automatic Gun, Anti-Aircraft, M1, on 40-mm Gun Carriage M2(A1)[32]

In 1938 theUnited States Armyintroduced a37 mm gunof their own design, but found it to be of limited performance. In early World War II, six British Bofors were imported for testing, along with Kerrison Predictordirectors,and they proved to be superior in all areas. By the middle part of the war, most of the 37 mm guns had been replaced by the 40 mm.In U.S. Army and Marine Corps service, the single mount Bofors was known as the40 mm Automatic Gun M1.[33]The U.S. version of the gun fired three variants of the British Mk. II high-explosive shell as well as the M81A1 armor-piercing round, which was capable of penetrating some 50 mm of homogeneous armor plate at a range of 500 yards. In the Army, each Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) auto-weapons battalion was authorized a total of thirty-two 40 mm guns in its four firing batteries.[34][35]Each U.S. Marine division had a "special weapons battalion" that included sixteen 40 mm guns; in early 1944 these were replaced with anti-aircraft battalions with twelve 40 mm guns.Marine defense battalionsalso used the 40 mm gun.[36]All of these unit types also included other AA weapons.

During World War II, the twin mount version of the gun was mounted on anM24 Chaffeetank chassis as theM19 Gun Motor Carriage.In the 1950s, theM41 Walker Bulldogtank was heavily modified into theM42 Dusterwith the same twin 40 mm mounting. After being largely withdrawn from service in the early 1960s, the M42 was re-introduced beginning in 1966 for theVietnam War,where it was mostly used for ground fire support. Following the withdrawal from Vietnam in the early 1970s, the M42 was retained inNational Guardservice until finally retired in 1988.

Captured examples

edit

In World War II Germany, theWehrmachtused a number of Bofors guns which had been captured in Poland and France. TheKriegsmarinealso operated some guns obtained from Norway. In German naval use, the gun was designated the "4 cm Flak 28", and was variously used aboard individual examples of many different classes of warship, including but not limited to; the cruisersAdmiral HipperandPrinz Eugentoward the end of the war; M1940-class minesweeper;vorpostenboot.[37]Beginning in 1942, several 'S 38 type'schnellbootewere equipped with the Flak 28, enabling them to fight against British MGBs and MTBs on equal terms.

Germany also purchased a large number (200+) ofHungarian-madeBofors guns. In return, Hungary received a75 mm PAK gunfor every 4-5 Bofors. The Wehrmacht used Hungarian guns after German occupation of Hungary from late 1944. Most of them were lost during the fights inBudapestandTransdanubia.[38]

Japan captured a number of Bofors guns inSingapore[39]and put them into production as the Type 5.[40]

After theContinuation wartheSoviet Uniontook possession of theFinnish coastal defence ship Väinämöinen,which was armed with four M/36 Bofors guns.[citation needed]

Service use

edit

Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/43

edit

The Bofors 40 mm L/43 is asubmarinevariant of L/60 with retractable mounting, and using low propellant charge ammunition.[41][page needed][18][42]

Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60

edit
The L/60 Bofors fitted to theKingston-classcoastal defence vesselHMCSNanaimo
Twin L/60 dismounted from an ArgentinianDrummond-class corvettewhich saw service during the Falklands War
Gunnery practice on the aircraft carrierHMASSydneyoff Korea in 1951

The L/60 remained in front-line service well into the 1980s and 1990s although it had been replaced in production by theBofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/70.In most cases, these were the ground anti-aircraft versions, as a suitable replacement in this role did not come along until the introduction of truly effectiveMANPADSmissiles in the 1980s and 1990s.[citation needed]

In United States Army service, theM19 Gun Motor Carriagewas replaced by theM42 Duster,using the same turret but based on the chassis of theM41 Walker Bulldogtank.[43]

The L/60 saw active service with the Argentinian and British navies in the 1982Falklands Warand continued to be used into the 1990s, when it was replaced by modern 20 mm and 30 mm artillery.[citation needed]

TheCanadian Forcesremoved the guns from their surface fleet in the late 1980s when they were considered to be outdated, only to re-use old Bofors guns as the main armament of theKingston-classcoastal defence vessel.[26]The Bofors served as the main armament for almost 20 years.[44]The decision to remove them was made in 2014, due to their maintenance burden, and their lack of stabilization.[citation needed]

As of August 2006, the French navy uses L/60s on more than twenty ships (patrols and auxiliaries).[citation needed]

Ships of theNorwegianandIcelandic Coast Guardscontinue to use the 40mm Bofors gun.[citation needed]

The L/60 continued in use in theIrish Armyuntil recent years, when it was retired in favour of the radar-controlled L/70. TheIrish Naval ServiceP20 class retained L/60s on board as their main weapon until the 1990s but were rearmed with L/70s. The last remaining P20-class patrol vessel, (Aisling) decommissioned in 2016, was the final vessel fitted with the L/70. Two retired L/60s can be seen adjacent the square in Sarsfield Barracks, Limerick.[citation needed]

The last 40 mm L/60 Bofors in service with theRoyal Australian Navy(RAN) were used as the main weapon aboard theAttackclassandFremantleclasspatrol boats and for training purposes at the West Head gunnery range atHMASCerberus.[45]These were removed from service during 2007; Bofors were used aboard almost every RAN ship to operate between the 1940s and the 1990s, including the aircraft carriersSydneyandMelbourne.[45]

In 2012, the L/60 was still being used by Brazil, Indonesia, Paraguay, Taiwan, and the United States.

AC-130 Gunship

edit
Bofors guns on an AC-130A Spectre gunship
Bofors 40 mm L/60 gun on display at theMuseum of Aviation.This gun was mounted in aAC-130U.

Since the beginning of the 1970s, the 40 mm Bofors L/60s have been used in theUnited States Air Force'sLockheed AC-130gunships in theair-to-groundrole.[46]Between 2006 and 2012, there were plans to remove these and the 20 mmM61 Vulcansfrom newer AC-130U variants and replace them with 30 mm autocannons. However, these plans did not come to fruition at the time, and the 40 mm Bofors and 20 mm Vulcans remained in service as of 2009,[47]though the later W- and upcoming J-model variants have 30 mmMk44 Bushmaster IIautocannons instead.[48][49]

When four additional AC-130Us were to be converted from 2002, the necessary 40 mm L/60 guns had to be salvaged from old M42 targets at the Nellis AFB range.[50]The final 40 mm L/60 guns in US service were retired in 2020 with the last of the AC-130Us.

Users

edit
Finnish soldiers operating the Bofors 40 mm gun during theContinuation War.
Map with users of the L/60 in blue

Wars

edit

See also

edit

References

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^L/43: 700–730 m/s (2,300–2,400 ft/s)
  1. ^abMcCollum, Ian (24 August 2018)."Swedish Antiaircraft Artillery: Bofors 40mm Automatic Gun M1".Youtube.Forgotten Weapons.Archivedfrom the original on 14 February 2019.Retrieved19 February2019.
  2. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiajakalam"Bofors 40mm (Series) Towed Anti-Aircraft Gun / Air Defense Gun - Sweden".www.militaryfactory.com.Military Factory.Archivedfrom the original on 19 February 2019.Retrieved19 February2019.[better source needed]
  3. ^abc"The Bofors gun that revolutionised air defences".saab.com.Retrieved25 January2022.The big breakthrough came at firing tests in Belgium in 1935 against a British competitor. It was found that the Bofors gun could be moved more than twice as quickly as the competitor's gun and that it scored three times as many hits when firing on aerial targets. The Belgian officers were amazed. The demonstrations in Belgium took place in the presence of representatives from the French War Ministry. It soon resulted in an order from the French Army, which was quite remarkable. Traditionally, France bought no guns from abroad.
  4. ^abc"Sweden Bofors 40 mm/60 (1.57" ) Model 1936 ".NavWeaps.Com. 14 January 2011.Archivedfrom the original on 21 February 2007.Retrieved24 September2011.
  5. ^ab"Naval Legends: Bofors | World of Warships (timestamped)".YouTube.23 March 2017.Retrieved25 January2022.In March 1932, the official trials of the automatic antiaircraft cannon L60 were completed, and it was put on the market. In 1933, British and American military engineers studied the gun, and were quite impressed - the Swedish system was more effective than the obsolete British Vickers "pom-poms" and had more firepower than the "Chicago pianos" used by the US.
  6. ^"40 Bofors anti-aircraft gun".basart.artillerie.asso.fr.Archived fromthe originalon 22 March 2016.Retrieved25 January2022.
  7. ^"40mm Luftvärnsautomatkanon m/48/ Bofors 40mm AA-gun model 1948".tfd.chalmers.se.Archived fromthe originalon 1 July 2007.Retrieved13 January2022.
  8. ^"PM nr 3 mars 1943: Bofors – Notiser"(PDF).Bofors PM: Personal-meddelanden till AB Bofors tjänstemän.Sweden: AB Bofors. 1943.Retrieved20 March2022.
  9. ^abBofors(Company presentation and marketing product catalogue (bound)) (in German).Karlskoga,Sweden:Aktiebolaget Bofors.1936. pp. 38–43.
  10. ^abBofors(Company presentation and marketing product catalogue (bound)).Karlskoga,Sweden:Aktiebolaget Bofors.1947.
  11. ^Bofors(Company presentation and marketing product catalogue (bound)).Karlskoga,Sweden:Aktiebolaget Bofors.1958.
  12. ^Cañón automatico de campaña de 57 mm Bofors(Product catalogue and description (ring binder)) (in Spanish).Aktiebolaget Bofors.1954.
  13. ^Gander, Terry (30 April 2013).The Bofors Gun.Pen and Sword.ISBN9781-78346-2025.Retrieved21 March2022.
  14. ^"Naval Historical Society of Australia: Model makers drawing, 40/60 Bofors Mk 5 Twin Mount".Archivedfrom the original on 31 March 2021.Retrieved20 March2022.
  15. ^"Articles on Bofors guns".tfd.chalmers.se.Archived fromthe originalon 8 June 2007.Retrieved25 May2022.
  16. ^"40 mm Luftvärnsautomatkanon m/36".tfd.chalmers.se.Archived fromthe originalon 1 July 2007.Retrieved25 May2022.
  17. ^Chinn, George M. (1955).The Machine Gun, History, Evolution, and Development of Manual, Automatic, and Airborne Repeating Weapons, Volume 4.USA: Ordnance Bureau (Navy Department). p. 520.Retrieved21 March2022.
  18. ^ab"Bofors 40 mm L/60 Model 1936".NavWeaps.Tony DiGiulian.Archivedfrom the original on 16 February 2018.
  19. ^"VII".Vapenregister för armén, 1951 år utgåva(in Swedish). Sweden: Royal Swedish Army Materiel Administration. 1951.
  20. ^abcdPrinciper för benämningar och förkortade beteckningar å marinens artillerimateriel och eldvapen samt motiv för förändringar av modellår m.m.(Archival document bundle) (in Swedish). Sweden:Royal Swedish Naval Materiel Administration.pp. 239, 244–256, 261–265, 257–260, 266–267.
  21. ^"40 mm. autk. och 25 mm. ksp".Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet.Kungliga Örlogmannasälskapet i Karlskrona: 18. 1937.
  22. ^Johnson, Melvin M. Jr.(1944).Rifles and Machine Guns.William Morrow and Company. p. 385.
  23. ^abcdefgEncyclopédie des Armes 1986,p. 1749.
  24. ^Boyd, David."Bofors 40mm Anti-Aircraft Gun".www.wwiiequipment.com.Archivedfrom the original on 14 March 2017.Retrieved13 March2017.
  25. ^TM 30-410 Handbook On The British Army 1942.United States War Department. 1942. p. 33.
  26. ^abPriestley, Stephen (June 2006)."The Kingston Class: 'Mid-Life' or Move Over for the MCDV?".Canadian American Strategic Review.Archived fromthe originalon 3 December 2013.Retrieved9 January2012.
  27. ^abcde"Chrysler Corporation, Gun Maker: Bofors Guns of World War II".Allpar.Archivedfrom the original on 7 November 2010.Retrieved4 November2010.
  28. ^Borth, Christy (1945),Masters of Mass Production,Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company, pp. 164–165, 197, 200–204
  29. ^abcdeRowland, Buford; Boyd, William (1954).US Navy Bureau of Ordnance in World War II.Washington, DC: US Navy Bureau of Ordnance, Department of the Navy. pp. 219–230.Archivedfrom the original on 10 October 2016.Retrieved29 September2016.
  30. ^Naval History And Heritage Command."American Legion".Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships.Naval History And Heritage Command.Archivedfrom the original on 24 September 2015.Retrieved10 August2015.
  31. ^Friedman, Norman(2004).U.S. Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History(Revised ed.). Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 130–131.ISBN1-55750-442-3.
  32. ^TM-9 252
  33. ^Encyclopédie des Armes 1986,p. 1753.
  34. ^"TO&E 44-25, AAA Auto-Weapons Battalion, Mobile"(PDF).militaryresearch.org.Archived(PDF)from the original on 10 October 2016.Retrieved29 September2016.
  35. ^"385th AAA Auto-Weapons Battalion website".Archived fromthe originalon 9 October 2016.Retrieved29 September2016.
  36. ^"Divisional Special Weapons Battalion at Gyrene.org".ww2gyrene.org.Archivedfrom the original on 25 October 2016.Retrieved29 September2016.
  37. ^Campbell, p. 254
  38. ^Barczy, Zoltán (2010).A Magyar Királyi Honvédség légvédelme 1920-1945.Budapest: Zrínyi.ISBN9789633274989.
  39. ^Lardas, Mark (23 December 2021).B-25 Mitchell vs Japanese Destroyer: Battle of the Bismarck Sea 1943.Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN978-1-4728-4518-4.
  40. ^Gander, Terry (30 April 2013).The Bofors Gun.Pen and Sword.ISBN978-1-78346-202-5.
  41. ^Gander, Terry (30 April 2013).The Bofors Gun.Pen and Sword.ISBN9781783462025.Archivedfrom the original on 29 October 2018 – via Google Books.
  42. ^Williams, Anthony G (2011)."Bofors Automatic Cannon".Military Guns & Ammunition.Archived fromthe originalon 28 December 2012.
  43. ^Doyle, David (31 August 2021).Vehicles and Heavy Weapons of the Vietnam War.Pen and Sword Military.ISBN978-1-5267-4367-1.
  44. ^ Nicolas le May (16 May 2017)."La Marine évalue un nouveau système d'armement pour ses navires de défense côtière"[Navy assesses new weapons system for its coastal defense vessels].45eNord(in French).Archivedfrom the original on 21 November 2018.Retrieved20 November2018.
  45. ^ab"Last blast for Bofors".Royal Australian Navy. 2007. Archived fromthe originalon 13 June 2011.Retrieved14 September2009.
  46. ^Development and Employment of Fixed-Wing Gunships, 1962–1972.Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force. 1982.ISBN9781428993648.Retrieved11 October2013.
  47. ^"A Spookier Spooky, 30mm at a Time? Nope".Defense Industry Daily.2009.Archivedfrom the original on 21 September 2013.Retrieved11 October2013.
  48. ^"AC-130W Stinger II - U.S. Air Force > Fact Sheet Display".U.S. Air Force.AFSOC Public Affairs.Archivedfrom the original on 22 April 2018.Retrieved18 April2018.
  49. ^"AC-130J Ghostrider - U.S. Air Force > Fact Sheet Display".U.S. Air Force.AFSOC Public Affairs.Archivedfrom the original on 28 April 2018.Retrieved18 April2018.
  50. ^"Air Commando Journal, Summer 2012, p. 22".
  51. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 376.
  52. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 81.
  53. ^abcdefWiener, Friedrich (1987).The armies of the NATO nations: Organization, concept of war, weapons and equipment.Truppendienst Handbooks Volume 3. Vienna: Herold Publishers. pp. 524–525.
  54. ^Darcourt, Pierre (January 1984)."Tchad: le désert des Tartares".La Gazette des armes(in French). No. 125. pp. 16–19.Archivedfrom the original on 19 October 2018.Retrieved18 October2018.
  55. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 390.
  56. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 441.
  57. ^Abbot, Peter (February 2014).Modern African Wars: The Congo 1960–2002.Oxford:Osprey Publishing.p. 14.ISBN978-1782000761.
  58. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 87.
  59. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 396.
  60. ^Military Balance 2016,pp. 257–258.
  61. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 109.
  62. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 439.
  63. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 268.
  64. ^Andersons, Edgars (2001)."The military situation in the Baltic States"(PDF).Baltic Defence Review.2001(6): 113–153.Archived(PDF)from the original on 24 January 2019.Retrieved23 January2019.
  65. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 276.
  66. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 277.
  67. ^Jowett, Philip (2016).Modern African Wars (5): The Nigerian-Biafran War 1967-70.Oxford:Osprey PublishingPress. p. 20.ISBN978-1472816092.
  68. ^Jowett 2016,p. 24.
  69. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 347.
  70. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 280.
  71. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 408.
  72. ^Mahé, Yann (April 2015). "Blindorama: Pérou 1936–1945".Batailles et Blindés(in French). No. 72. pp. 12–13.
  73. ^Mark Axworthy, London: Arms and Armour, 1995,Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941–1945,p. 30
  74. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 464.
  75. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 289.
  76. ^Military Balance 2016,pp. 293–294.
  77. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 146.
  78. ^ab"Canon antiaérien Bofors L/70 de 40 mm".Encyclopédie des armes: Les forces armées du monde(in French). Vol. II. Atlas. 1986. pp. 1859–1860.
  79. ^Military Balance 2016,p. 417.

Bibliography

edit
  • "Bofors de 40 mm".Encyclopédie des armes: Les forces armées du monde(in French). Vol. II. Atlas. 1986. pp. 1749–1753.
  • Bishop, C (ed.) 2002,Encyclopaedia of weapons of World War II,MetroBooks, New York.
  • Campbell, John.Naval Weapons of World War Two.Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1985.ISBN0-87021-459-4.
  • Gander, T., 1990,The 40mm Bofors Gun,2nd ed., Patrick Stephens, Wellingborough, Eng.
  • International Institute for Strategic Studies(February 2016).The Military Balance 2016.Vol. 116. Routlegde.ISBN9781857438352.
  • Rae, CJE, Harris, AL, and Bryant, RK (1987),On target: the story of the 2/3 Australian Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment from formation on 18 July 1940 until disbandment on 14 July 1943 and the subsequent service of 7th Battery, 8th Battery, and 9th Battery, until the end of World War II,2/3rd Australian Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment Association, [Melbourne].
  • Foss, Christopher (1977).Jane's pocket book of towed artillery.New York: Collier. pp. 231–233.ISBN0020806000.OCLC911907988.
  • TM 9-252 40-mm Automatic Gun M1 (AA) and 40-mm Antiaircraft Gun Carriages M2 And M2A1.United States War Department. 1944.
edit