Wikipedia

Brick tax

Thebrick taxwas aproperty taxintroduced in Great Britain in 1784, during the reign of KingGeorge III,to help pay for thewars in the American Colonies.Brickswere initially taxed at 2s6dper thousand.[1]The brick tax was eventually abolished in 1850.[2]

Wilkes' Gobs oversize bricks in the wall of former Ashby Canal warehouse alongside modern bricks of bridge parapet, High Street, Measham.

Proposal

edit

The brick tax was first proposed byLord George Lytteltonin 1756.[3]The proposal was perceived as partial since parts of Britain used mainly stone for building and also as unfair since the tax would not apply to the rich as their houses were built almost exclusively from stone. Lyttelton failed to pass the brick tax proposal and consequently started to promote tax on publicans, which (at the rate of 1l.per a business licence) was calculated to generate considerably more revenue than the brick tax.[4]

The brick tax was proposed and rejected again in 1778.[1]

The brick tax finally passed in 1784 to cover costs of War of American Independence.[1]The reason bricks were chosen to be the subject of the tax was that there had been a significant growth in popularity of the material in the late 1700s.[5]

Development

edit

The brick tax was levied on bricks before burning. To be able to examine if a brick had been taxed, the mould would have the word 'excise' on it which would leave an imprint on the brick.

Brick were originally taxed at 2s 6d per thousand. The tax was increased to 4s per thousand in 1794 and again to 5s in 1797.[1]

To mitigate the effects of the tax, manufacturers began to increase the size of their bricks. Many buildings built byJoseph WilkesinMeasham,Leicestershire,used bricks known asWilkes' gobsthat were9+1⁄4in ×4+1⁄4in ×4+1⁄4in (230 mm × 110 mm × 110 mm).[6]

In 1801, the government responded by limiting the dimensions of a brick to 10 in × 5 in × 3 in (254 mm × 127 mm × 76 mm) and doubling the tax on bricks that were larger. The maximum size applied to the mould, meaning the finished bricks were smaller due to shrinkage while burning the bricks.[1]

The final raise of the brick tax was in 1805 giving the price of 5s 10d per thousand bricks.[1]

The brick tax was finally abolished in 1850,[2]by which time it was considered to be a detriment to industrial development.[7]

Consequences

edit

One of the consequences of the brick tax was that some minor brick producers went out of business, forced to sell their stock to meet tax arrears.[8]It also had an effect on architecture, with many areas returning to the use of timber andweatherboardingin house construction, especially weather tiles to simulate brick work, known asmathematical tiles.[9][10][11]

The brick tax caused the price of brick grow, which meant that construction and rent became more expensive.[12]

Until 1833 the brick tax also applied to tiles and pipes. The taxation of pipes led to a lower quality of housing as many households could not afford drainage pipes due to their increased price. Tiles were taxed based on the size and level of decoration, which made people use plain tiles, which were the cheapest. That resulted in a setback of the development of architecture and style.[12]

After the repeal of the brick tax in 1850, we can see an improvement of brick quality in churches and public buildings. Moreover, buildings constructed before 1784 and after 1850 show more ornaments than buildings built during the time of the brick tax.[12]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abcdef"Brick Tax 1784 – 1850".2015-06-20.Retrieved2019-02-13.
  2. ^abMurden, Sarah (2015-03-10)."18th Century Taxes".All Things Georgian.Retrieved2020-03-05.
  3. ^Lyttelton, George (1845).Memoire and Correspondence of George Lyttelton: From 1734-73. Compiled and edited by Robert Phillimore(Vol. 2 ed.). Jam. Ridgway Piccadilly. p. 501.
  4. ^Dowell, Stephen (1888).A History of Taxation and Taxes in England from the Earliest Times to the Year 1885(Vol. 2 ed.). Longmans, Green. pp. 130, 131.
  5. ^Lucas, Robin (1997)."The Tax on Bricks and Tiles, 1784-1850: its Application to the Country at large and, in particular, to,the County of Norfolk"(PDF).Construction History Vol. 13.The Construction History Society. pp. 29–30.
  6. ^J.M. McComish (2015)."A Guide To Ceramic Building Materials"(PDF).p. 43. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2017-12-15.Retrieved2019-02-13.
  7. ^Warren (1998),p. 53
  8. ^Chartered Institute of Building (1994),p. 49
  9. ^Brunskill & Clifton-Taylor (1977),p. 40
  10. ^Stenhouse (1977),p. 47
  11. ^"A History of Building Materials. By Norman Davey. (London: Phoenix House, J. M. Dent & Sons, 1961. Second impression, 1965. Distributed by Lawrence Verry, Inc., Mystic, Connecticut. Illustrations, bibliography, index. 260 pp. $14.00)".Forest & Conservation History.10(2): 22. July 1966.doi:10.2307/3982831.ISSN1046-7009.JSTOR3982831.
  12. ^abcPeto, Samuel Morton (1863).Taxation: Its Levy and Expenditure, Past and Future; Being an Enquiry Into Our Financial Policy.Chapman and Hall. pp. 128, 129.

Further reading

edit
  • Davey, Norman (1961),A History of Building Materials,London: Phoenix House, p. 83
  • Warren, John (1998),Conservation of Brick,Architectural Press,ISBN978-0-7506-3091-7
  • Journal of the Construction History Society, Volumes 10-15,Chartered Institute of Building, 1994
  • Brunskill, R. W.; Clifton-Taylor, Alec (1977),English Brickwork,Ward Lock,ISBN978-0-7063-5087-6
  • Stenhouse, David (1977),Understanding Towns,Wayland,ISBN978-0-85340-440-8
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brick_tax&oldid=1253035321"