Broadcasting Act(Canada)

TheBroadcasting Act(French:Loi sur la radiodiffusion), givenroyal assenton 1 February 1991, is anactof theParliament of Canadaregardingbroadcastingoftelecommunicationsin the country.

Broadcasting Act
Parliament of Canada
Long title An Act respecting broadcasting and to amend certain Acts in relation thereto and in relation to radiocommunication
Citation	S.C. 1991, c. 11
Enacted by	Parliament of Canada
Assented to	1 February 1991
Administered by	Canadian Heritage
Amended by
Online Streaming Act
Related legislation
Telecommunications Act Radiocommunication Act
Status:Amended

TheBroadcasting Actoutlines broadcasting policy of Canada; defines the role of theCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission(CRTC) as the broadcasting regulator; and sets out the mandate ofCBC/Radio-Canada.The stated goal of theBroadcasting Actis to maintain Canada'scultural fabric—thereby strengthening its economic, political, and social structures—by supporting the country's creative industries and ensuring the availability and accessibility of Canadian music and stories, among other things.

On 3 November 2020,Heritage MinisterSteven Guilbeaultintroduced legislation (Bill C-10) that would update theActto include online broadcasting services.

History

The first version of theBroadcasting Actreceivedroyal assenton 23 June 1936, and was subsequently updated in 1958. The 1958 Act created theBoard of Broadcast Governors(BBG) to replace theCanadian Broadcasting Corporationas the regulator for broadcasting in Canada.In 1968, theBroadcasting Actwould be updated yet again, this time creating the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) to replace the BBG.(The CRTC’s name was changed in 1976 to Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, reflecting the transfer of telecommunications regulatory responsibilities to it from the Canadian Transportation Commission.)

The 1968 legislation would receive amendments in 1991, whereupon it would become the present-day legislation.This would be the last major reform of theBroadcasting Act—prior to the wide availability of theInternet.

Canadian Radio Broadcasting Act,1932 & 1933

In 1932, Prime MinisterR. B. Bennettestablished aparliamentary committee,the Special Committee on Radio Broadcasting, to hold hearings in order to determine the major concerns facing Canadian broadcasters, upon which the committee would make subsequent recommendations. In March and April, the Committee heard from various witnesses who made arguments regarding federal versus provincial control, as well as private versus public broadcasting.

The Committee reported to Parliament in May, presenting a short report that emphasized the importance of radio broadcasting in regard to national needs related to educational, social, and cultural development. The Committee suggested the development of a new public broadcasting system that would include: a) nationally-owned high-powered stations, and b) secondary, low-powered stations to be used for community, educational, and experimental purposes. This new system would receive revenue from both advertising and licensing fees, and would be run by a three-person commission (as well as provincially-appointed assistant commissioners) that has the authority to regulate all aspects of the system.

On 26 May 1932, theBennett governmentpassed theCanadian Radio Broadcasting Act,largely based on the recommendations of the Committee. This Act would create the first broadcasting regulatory body in Canada, theCanadian Radio Broadcasting Commission(CRBC), tasked with regulating and controlling all Canadian broadcasting, as well as with establishing a national service. The Act also stated that the air is a public asset and therefore the government has a role to play in monitoring its use.

Amendments were made to theCanadian Radio Broadcasting Actthe following year, making the CRBC accountable to Cabinet rather than Parliament, and thus giving the Commission more power over hiring decisions, revenue spending, and station purchases. One of the first major decisions of CRBC would be to place a 40% limit on foreign programs.

Broadcasting Act,1936 & 1949

In 1936,C. D. Howewas appointed as the minister responsible for broadcasting, and in March, creates a new parliamentary committee on radio broadcasting that looks into the general performance of the CRBC.

On May 26, the Committee tables its report, advocating a) the creation of a national corporation to oversee public broadcasting; b) making this new corporation the regulatory authority over broadcasting; and c) greater co-operation between this new public corporation and private radio stations

The following month, Howe introduces the CanadianBroadcasting Actto create a new broadcasting agency and dissolve the CRBC. This legislation receivedroyal assenton 23 June 1936 and created the CBC as the regulator for broadcasting in Canada.

In 1949, aRoyal Commission on National Development in the Arts, Letters and Sciences(or the Massey Commission) is created, with the mandate to study radio and television broadcasting in Canada. Tabling its report, one of the suggestions made by the Commission would be to provide more funds to the CBC via astatutorygrantin order to resolve the corporation's negative financial situation. In accordance with this advice, among others, theBroadcasting Actis amended, providing the CBC with a statutory grant for five years.

Broadcasting Act,1958 & 1968

On 18 August 1958, theDiefenbaker governmentintroduced a newBroadcasting Act.

This legislation would include a plan to create a new regulatory body called theBoard of Broadcast Governors(BBG) as well as to re-establish the role of the CBC, thereby making the main method of public intervention in broadcasting be done via regulation. The new Act would also affirm that, though the CBC operates a national service, the BBG would be in charge of the national system; therefore, the CBC must report to both its Minister and the BBG. Moreover, it would make private and public broadcasting services be seen as equal, and place a 25% limit on foreign ownership.

In 1961, a Special Committee on Broadcasting is formed once again. One of the issues to be addressed by the Committee would be the prevalence of a new technology calledcommunity antenna television,in which wired systems takeover-the-air programmingand retransmit them to households via cable.

The BBG's chair, among others, question whether cable could be considered as a type of broadcasting, while CBC presidentAlphonse Ouimetargued that the definition of broadcasting found in theBroadcasting Actought to be expanded to include cable. Another suggestion would be to redefine the concept of broadcasting itself, changing it from something that is associated with the transmission and control of airwaves to the actual "end effect," whereby what really matters is the end reception of programs by households. Considering these issues, the Committee would suggest areferenceto theSupreme Courton questions regarding a) constitutional jurisdiction over cable (i.e., wired systems), and b) whether such systems can be deemed as broadcasting under theBroadcasting Act.

Finally, in 1963,Douglas Fisherintroduced amendments to theBroadcasting Actto cover "any system operated for a profit that took out of the airHertzian wavesand rebroadcast them to wired systems in homes. "

Cable systems remain unregulated at this time and their growth continues to depend solely on the market. In March 1964, a committee consisting of BBG andDepartment of Transportmembers suggests that one way to reassert federal jurisdiction for cable is to expand the mandate of the BBG. By extending the "objects and purposes" of theActto include both stations that receivecommercial broadcastingand stations that feed cablerelay systems,the BBG can regulate these entities so that they perform in a way "consistent with the public interest in the reception of a varied and comprehensive broadcasting service." In May, a Special Advisory Committee on Broadcasting is created to study theBroadcasting Actand recommend changes.

On 17 October 1967, the Canadian government introduced legislation designed to establish "a statutory policy for broadcasting in Canada and to assign the responsibility for interpretation and implementation of that policy to an independent public authority." Among other things, the bill sought to establish a new regulatory authority, theCanadian-Radio Television Commission(CRTC), as well as laying the groundwork for the imminent regulation of cable by including the term "broadcasting undertaking" to include both transmitting and receiving enterprises.

TheBroadcasting Actis passed on 7 February 1968, becoming law on April 1. As part of the new legislation, the newly created CRTC would replace the BBG as the entity to oversee all aspects of the Canadian broadcasting system.

1970s to 1990s

On 15 January 1970, CRTC ChairPierre Juneaustated that regulating cable under a federal regulatory authority was in accordance with the objectives of theBroadcasting Act.In 1973, withGérard PelletierasMinister of Communications,the Canadian government published agreen papertitled "Proposals for a Communications Policy for Canada." The paper warns againstdirect broadcast satellitesandcomputer systemsfollowing the path of cable, which had gone unregulated for years before it finally came under theBroadcasting Act.

The 1968 Act would receive amendments in 1991, whereupon it would become the current Act.This would be the last major reform of theBroadcasting Act—prior to the wide availability of theInternet.

Structure

TheBroadcasting Actcovers three main sections: a broadcasting policy for Canada; the regulatory powers of the CRTC; and the operating procedures and policies for theCanadian Broadcasting Corporation.

The Act imposes a Canadian-owned and controlled system of broadcasting and includes provisions regarding Canadian content in programming and production. It encourages the development of Canadian expression and the use of Canadian talent and creative resources. There is also a specific emphasis on reflecting Canada's cultural diversity: section 3 states that programming and employment opportunities should serve the needs and interests of all Canadians, and reflect their various circumstances.

TheBroadcasting Actemphasizes that each broadcaster is responsible for its own programs and that a high standard of programming is expected. There is no specific reference, however, to address violent programming or hate propaganda.

The CRTC addresses issues of media violence, and hate messaging through its regulations for radio, television, speciality services and pay-television.

If a broadcaster fails to follow theBroadcasting Actpolicies or regulations, the CRTC may invoke a number of penalties — such as imposing fines or limiting or denying a station's application for licence renewal.

Proposed amendments

The 1991 amendment would be the last major reform of theBroadcasting Act—prior to the wide availability of theInternet.

In the2017 federal budget plan,the Canadian Government proposed a review and modernization of theBroadcasting Act,as well as theTelecommunications Act,in order to "ensure that Canadians continue to benefit from an open and innovative Internet." In this review, the Government would "look to examine issues such as telecommunications andcontent creationin the digital age,net neutralityandcultural diversity."

In mid-September later that year, theGovernor in Councilissued an order to the CRTC to create a report on "new distribution models for broadcasting, and the extent to which they will ensure a vibrant domestic market that supports Canadian content production."The report was released by CRTC the following year, on 31 May 2018, in a digital-only, interactive format. Entitled "Harnessing Change", the report recommended that all those who benefit from operations in Canada also contribute to the production of Canadian content.

Following the report, in June 2018, the Government launched the "Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review," appointing an external panel to review the issues first outlined in the 2017 budget, i.e. the Canadian communication legislative framework.On 13 December 2019, themandateletters for theminister of Canadian heritageand theminister of industryincluded commitments to modernize theBroadcasting Actand to ensure that "internet giants" contribute to Canadian content in bothofficial languages.

On 29 January 2020, the Review Panel presented their final report, titled "Canada's Communications Future: Time to Act", toNavdeep Bains,minister of industry, and toSteven Guilbeault,minister of Canadian heritage. In it, the Panel insists to include online broadcasters in Canada's regulatory framework.The panel also called for the end of advertising on the CBC, while recommending streaming services (likeNetflixandAmazon Prime Video) be mandated to fund the creation ofCanadian content.

Online Streaming Act

Main article:Online Streaming Act

On 3 November 2020,Minister of Canadian HeritageSteven Guilbeaultproposed legislation to update theActto account for the increased prominence ofinternet videoand digital media, acting upon the urgent recommendations by the Review Panel to addinternet undertakingsto the regulatory oversight of the CRTC.

Bill C-10 has faced mixed responses. Critics of the proposed legislation have argued that it vests an incredible amount of power to the CRTC, who are unelected regulators and receive very little guidance from Parliament or the government.University of OttawaprofessorMichael Geistacknowledged that the bill removes a number of long-standing policies from theActthat were intended to protect Canada's broadcasting system, including the requirement that all broadcasters be Canadian-owned and controlled, and the expectation that broadcasters make "maximum use, and in no case less than predominant use" of Canadian talent in programming,

The removal of an exception foruser-generated contenton social media from the bill has also faced criticism for potentially enablinginternet censorship;former CRTC commissioner Peter Menzies stated that "granting a government agency authority over legal user generated content — particularly when backed up by the government’s musings about taking down websites — doesn’t just infringe onfree expression,it constitutes a full-blown assault upon it and, through it, the foundations of democracy. "Minister of HeritageSteven Guilbeaultstated that Bill C-10 was intended to cover "professional series, films, and music", and argued that the bill included "safeguards" to protect individual users.Some critics have also argued that the intent of the bill was to allow a regulatory framework for the removal ofcopyright infringingcontent.

The bill was passed by the House of Commons, but was not passed by the Senate before Parliament was dissolved. The bill was reintroduced in February 2022 as Bill C-11, theOnline Streaming Act.On September 22, 2022 at Bill-11's second reading, Senator Paula Simon reported on theCanadian Senate Standing Committee on Transport and Communication's (TRCM) review of Bill-11.

See also

• Canadian Broadcast Standards Council
• Canadian content

External links

• Department of Justice - Full text of the Broadcasting Act
• Video: "The Broadcasting Act: Structure and Background[18:52]. "Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.