Wikipedia

Chieftain (tank)

(Redirected fromChieftain tank)

TheFV4201 Chieftainwas themain battle tank(MBT) of theUnited Kingdomfrom the 1960s into 1990s. When introduced, it was among the most heavily armed MBTs of the era, mounting a 120 mmRoyal Ordnance L11gun, the equal of the much larger specialistheavy tanksthen in service. It also was among the most heavily armoured, with up to 195 mm (7.7 in) that was highly sloped to offer 388 mm (15.3 in) thickness along the line of sight.

Chieftain (FV4201)
A Chieftain Mark 11 at theBovington Tank Museum(2013)
TypeMain battle tank
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Service history
In service1960s–1990s
Used byUnited Kingdom,Iran,Iraq,Jordan,Kuwait,Oman
WarsIran–Iraq War
Persian Gulf War
1991 uprisings in Iraq
Production history
ManufacturerLeyland Motors
Unit cost£90,000–£100,000 (1967)[1]
No.built1896 (900 for the UK, 996 exported)
Specifications
Mass55long tons(62short tons;56t)
Length35 ft 4 in (10.77 m) – gun forward[2]
7.5 m (24 ft 7 in) – hull
Width12 ft 0 in (3.66 m)[2]
Height2.9 m (9 ft 6 in)
Crew4
ArmourGlacis:127 mm (5.0 in) (72°)[3]
Hull sides: 50 mm (2.0 in) (10°)
Turret: 350 mm (14 in) (60°)[3]
Main
armament
L11A5 120 mm rifled gun
Secondary
armament
2 ×L7 Machine Gun
EngineLeyland L60(multifuel2-strokeopposed-pistoncompression-ignition)
750 hp (560 kW) 6 Cyl, 19 litres.
Power/weight11.1 hp (8.3 kW)/ton (at sprocket)[2]
TransmissionTN 12[2]
SuspensionHorstmann: Horizontal Coil Spring Suspension Bogies
Ground clearance1 ft 10 in (0.56 m))[2]
Fuel capacity195 imp gal (890 L; 234 US gal)[2]
Operational
range
500 km (310 miles) on roads
Maximum speedRoad: 40 km/h (25 mph) (Mk. 1- Mk. 3)
43 km/h (27 mph) (Mk. 5)[4]

A development of theCenturion,the Chieftain introduced the supine (reclining) driver position to British design allowing a heavily sloped hull with reduced height. A new powerpack and improved transmission gave it higher speed than the Centurion despite being heavier due to major upgrades to armour protection and the armament; this allowed it to replace both theCenturionMBT andConquerorheavy tank while performing their roles effectively.

The multi-fuel engine proved to be the design's primary drawback;[5]it was said that the Chieftain was extremely effective if it broke down in a useful location. This led to a series of improved models with new armor, sensors, engines and suspension systems, and these saw sales export success. Among these was theShir 2version forIran,which addedChobham armour,one of the first British uses of this armour. This order was cancelled due to theIranian Revolutionin 1979.

It was intended that the Chieftain would be replaced by a new design, theMBT-80.When tensions with theWarsaw Pactrose in 1980,Vickersoffered a further updated version of the Shir 2 which becameChallenger 1.This could be available years earlier and still met many of the MBT-80 design goals. Challenger deliveries began in 1983, but initially proved problematic and the Chieftain remained in front-line service until 1996 with the introduction of theChallenger 2.

Development

edit

The Chieftain was an evolutionary development of the successfulcruiserline of tanks that had emerged at the end of theSecond World War.Its predecessor, theCenturionmain battle tank (MBT), is widely considered to be one of the most successful of post-war MBT designs.[6][7][8][9][10][11]However, the introduction of the SovietIS-3/IS-4heavy tankalong with SovietT-54/T-55led to the introduction of theConquerorheavy tank armed with a 120 mm (4.7 in) gun. A single design combining the firepower of the Conqueror's 120 mm gun with the mobility and general usefulness of the Centurion was seen as the ideal combination.

Early concept drawing of the FV4201 Chieftain featuring apike noseand different road wheel configuration.

Starting in 1950, a series of Concept Research Studies were undertaken "in the search for a design to succeed Centurion".[12]These involved both a development of the existing Centurion Heavy Cruiser Tank design, as well as a variety of unconventional concepts such as small 1 & 2 man tanks equipped with anti-tank missiles or auto-loading and liquid-propellant guns. in 1954 the decision was taken that "the next UK tank should be an evolutionary one designed to carry an HV gun with a bagged charge ammunition system".[12]

Leyland,who had been involved in the Centurion tank, had built their own prototypes of a new tank design in 1956. Several aspects of the design were trialled by the production of theFV4202"40-ton Centurion" with a reclined driver position and mantletless gun mounting. In effect, the FV4202 was a shorter Centurion chassis with a prototype of what would become the Chieftain turret, but armed with the 20pdr gun.[13][page needed]

This work led to aWar Officespecification for a new tank. The General Staff specification drew on the experience of Centurion tanks in theKorean Waras well as that of the Conqueror tank. The tank was expected to be able to engage the enemy at long range, from defensive positions, and be proof against medium artillery. To this end, the gun was to have a greater angle of depression than the 8 degrees of Conqueror and would be equipped with better frontal armour. The tank was expected to achieve a firing rate of 10 rounds per minute in the first minute and six per minute for the following four.

The first few prototypes were provided for troop trials from 1959 which identified a number of changes. Improvements to address engine vibration and cooling resulted in a redesign of the rear hull. This increased the design weight to nearly 50 tons and accordingly the suspension (which had been designed for 45 tons) was strengthened. Trackpads had to be fitted to protect roads from damage and the ground clearance increased. The design was accepted in the early 1960s.

Britain and Israel had collaborated on the development in its latter stages[14]with a view to Israel purchasing and domestically producing the vehicle. Two prototypes were delivered as part of a four-year trial. However, it was eventually decided not to sell the marque to the Israelis (since, at that period of time in the late 1960s, the UK was more friendly towards the Arab states and Jordan than to Israel),[15]which prompted them to follow their own development programme.[16]

Chieftain on aThornycroft Antartank transporter

In 1957, NATO had specified that its forces should use multi-fuel engines. The early Leyland engine delivered around 450 bhp (340 kW) to the sprocket, which meant a top road speed of around 25 mph (40 km/h) and cross-country performance was limited. Whilst theHorstmann coil spring suspensionreduced the on-road ride-quality compared to tanks with torsion bar suspension, Colonel Peter Hamer of the 11th Hussars commented that "over really bad rough ground it could leave aLeopardfor dead ".[17]Due to the cylinder linings being pressure fitted, coolant leaks within the cylinder block were common, resulting in white smoke billowing from the exhaust.

In the late 1970s, engine design changed with the introduction ofBelzonawhich was used to improve the lining seals. Engine output also increased, with later engines delivering some 850 bhp (630 kW) to the sprocket. This meant better performance and an increased speed. However, cross-country performance remained limited.

Design

edit
Chieftain display at theBovington tank museum,2006

The design of the Chieftain included a heavily sloped hull and turret which greatly increased the effective thickness of the frontal armour – 388 mm (15.3 in) on the glacis (from an actual thickness of 120 mm (4.7 in)) and 390 mm (15.4 in) on the turret (from 195 mm (7.7 in)).[3]It had amantletlessturret in order to take full advantage of reclining the vehicle up to ten degrees in a hull-down position.

For security reasons early prototypes had a canvas screen covering the mantlet and a sheet metal box mounted over the sloping glacis plate to disguise the configuration of the vehicle.[18]

The driver lay semi-recumbent in the hull when his hatch was closed down which helped to reduce the profile of the forward glacis plate. The commander, gunner and loader were situated in the turret. To the left side of the turret was a large searchlight with infrared capability in an armoured housing.[19]

The original design of the Chieftain tank called for a petrol "V8 Rolls Royce engine".[17]With a two year delay in the development of the V8 engine - "the decision was taken to drop the V8 and go with a yet to be produced multi fuel engine[20]."

ALeyland L60engine pack displayed at the Bovington tank museum. The complete unit could be removed by the crane of theFV434.

TheLeyland L60engine is atwo-strokeopposed pistondesign intended formulti-fueluse so that it could run on whatever fuel was available. In practice the engine did not deliver the expected power and was unreliable, estimated to have a 90% breakdown rate but improvements were introduced to address this. Primary problems includedcylinder linerfailure, fan drive problems and perpetual leaks due to vibration and badly routed pipework. However, as the engine power improved the tank itself became heavier.[19]

The tank was steered by conventional tillers hydraulically actuating onto external brake discs. The discs worked via theepicyclic gearboxproviding "regenerative" steering. TheMerritt-Brown TN12triple-differential gearbox was operated motorcycle-style with a kick up/kick down "peg" on the left, which actuated electro-hydraulic units in the gearbox, the accelerator cable was operated by the right foot. In the turret, the loader was on the left and the gunner on the right of the gun with the commander situated behind the gunner. The suspension was of theHorstmannbogie type with large side steel plates to protect the tracks and provide stand-off protection from hollow charge attack.[19]

Detail of the120 mm L11A5 rifled gun

The main armament was the120 mm L11A5 rifled gun.This differed from most contemporary main tank armament as it used projectiles and charges that were loaded separately, as opposed to a single fixed round. The design of the Bagged Charge System was initiated after the earlier Liquid Propellant Gun project had failed due to the injection pump being so large that "no tank could accommodate it".[12]This led to design studies to find "means of reducing the ammunition size and from this the bagged charge concept emerged".[12]The charges were encased in combustible bags. Other tank guns such as the 120mm L1 gun on the Conqueror, needed to store the spent shell cartridges or eject them outside. The combustible charges were stored in 36 recesses surrounded by a pressurised[2]water/glycol mixture – so-called "wet-stowage". In the event of a hit penetrating the fighting compartment, the jacket would rupture soaking the charges and preventing a catastrophic propellant explosion.[21]As there was no shell case, the firing of the charge was by vent tubes automatically loaded from a ten-round magazine on the breech.[2]Due to the length of the gun, which required balancing, and the need for storage space, the turret has a large overhang to the rear. This contains radios, ammunition and fire control equipment and has further stowage externally.[2]

The gun could fire a wide range of ammunition but the most commonly loaded types werehigh explosive squash head(HESH),armour-piercing discarding sabot(APDS), or practice round equivalents for both types. The Chieftain could store up to 64 projectiles (although the propellant stowage allowed a maximum of 36 charges for APDS rounds). The gun was fully stabilised with a fully computerized integrated control system. The secondary armament consisted of a coaxialL8A1 7.62 mmmachine gun and another 7.62 mm machine gun mounted on the commander's cupola.[19]An advantage of using two-part ammunition was that in the case of inert rounds like APDS the loader could reach for the next round and hold it in his lap, ready to load while the gunner was acquiring the target and firing. This practice increases the rate of fire but would be hazardous with one-piece ammunition.[22]

Chieftain had anNBCprotection system which Centurion lacked.[19]Aninfantry telephonewas fitted to the rear of the tank to facilitate communication with infantry.

The initialFire-control system(FCS) was the Marconi FV/GCE Mk 4. A.50-inch (12.7 mm)ranging gunwas mounted above the main gun (with 300 rounds available). This fired ranging shots out to a maximum of 2,600 yards (2,400 m), at which point the tracer in the ranging rounds burned out although the high explosive tip still created a visible "splash" on impact. The tank commander had a rotating cupola with nine vision blocks -giving all round view, plus the 7.62 mm machine-gun and an infrared (IR) capable projector coaxial with the weapon. The aiming systems were provided for both the gunner and the tank commander; they had 1x or 10x selectable magnification power, increasing to x15 in the Mk5 and beyond, and they were replaceable with IR vision systems for night operations (3x magnification power). The commander could rotate his cupola to bring his sight onto a target and then engage the mechanism that brought the turret round on to the correct bearing so that the gunner could complete the aiming.[19]

The commander's controls had over-ride capability on those of the gunner.[19]

Chieftain tanks at theCanadian Army Trophyin 1979.

The left side of the turret had a large searchlight with an electrically controlled infrared filter inside an armoured box, with a relatively long range – up to 1–1.5 kilometres (0.62–0.93 mi).[23]

From the beginning of the 1970s, the Mk 3/3 version replaced the ranging gun with aBarr and StroudLF-2laser rangefinderwith a 10 km (6.2 mi) range. This allowed engagements at much longer ranges, and also could be linked to the fire control system, allowing more rapid engagements and changes of target.[19]

On later models, fire control was provided by the Marconi IFCS (Improved Fire Control System), using a digital ballistic computer. The upgrade was not finished until the end of 1980, when some examples (but not the majority) had the IR searchlight replaced with TOGS. Many later examples hadStillbrew armour,intended to defeat Soviet 125 mm tank guns and heavy anti-tank missiles. These became the Mark 10 and then Mk 11 version.[23]The Chieftain used the TESS (TElescopic Sighting System) developed in the early 1980s that was later sold as surplus for use on theRAF Phantomaircraft.[24][25]

Service

edit
Chieftain tanks of14th/20th King's Hussarson parade with urban camouflage,Straße des 17. Juni,West Berlin,18 June 1989.

Chieftain equipped British units of theBritish Army of the Rhine(BAOR) during the Cold War, defended West Germany against possible Warsaw Pact attack.

Like its European competitors, the Chieftain found a large export market in theMiddle East,but unlike the Centurion, it was not adopted by any otherNATOor Commonwealth country.

The Chieftain proved itself capable in combat and able to be upgraded, both for overall improvement and to meet local requirements. It was continuously upgraded until the early 1990s, when it was replaced byChallenger 1.The final Chieftain version, which was used by the British Army until 1995, incorporated "Stillbrew" armour named after Colonel Still and John Brewer from theMilitary Vehicles and Engineering Establishment(MVEE), the Improved Fire Control System (IFCS) and theThermal Observation Gunnery Sight(TOGS). The last British Regiment equipped with Chieftains was the1st Royal Tank Regiment,which was based atAliwal Barracks,Tidworth.

A former Iranian Army Chieftain Mk.5 main battle tank on display at theKubinka Tank Museum

The first model was introduced in 1967. Chieftains were supplied to at least six countries, includingIran,Kuwait,OmanandJordan.An agreement for sales toIsraeland local production was cancelled by the British Government in 1969,[26]despite considerable Israeli technical and tactical input into the development of the tank, especially the capacity to operate successfully in desert environments, and the provision for the tank to make good use ofhull-downpositioning. Two examples were delivered to, and extensively trialled by, the Israeli Armoured Corps. This experience spurred the creation of the indigenous IsraeliMerkava,the development programme was led by GeneralIsrael Tal,who had worked closely with the British in the Anglo-Israeli Chieftain project. The largest foreign sale was to Iran, who, at the recommendation of General Tal, took delivery of 707 Mk-3P and Mk-5P (the letter P standing for Persia), as well as 187 FV4030-1, 41 ARV and 14 AVLB before the1979 revolution.[27][28][29]Further planned deliveries of the more capable FV4030-2 (Shir 1) and FV4030-3 (Shir 2) series were cancelled at that point.

Formation of Chieftain tanks captured inOperation Forty Stars

It was in the Middle East that the Chieftain was to see all of its operational experience. It was first used extensively by Iran, during theIran–Iraq Warof 1980–88, including thelargest tank battle of the war,with mixed results as the Chieftain Mk 3/5 suffered from chronic engine problems and lowpower-to-weight ratio,making it unreliable and slow when manoeuvering over harsh terrain, which in turn made it prone to breakdowns in the midst of battle or a sluggish target and thus vulnerable to enemy tank fire.[30][31]After the tank battle atSusangerd,captured Chieftains of the Iranian92nd Armored Divisionwere taken back to Baghdad for trials. According to Aladdin Makki, the Iraqi Army Corps chief of staff, in a post-war interview, Iraqi sabot rounds "Went through the front armour of the Chieftain and came out the backside". This as well as the Chieftain's poor off-road capability influenced the Iraqis to reject British arms sale propositions, who were at the time courting Iraq for arms sales that included Chieftain MBT's. According to Makki, when the British telephoned the Iraqi director of Armor, Salah Askar, he responded with "We don't want your stupid tanks!" Ra'ad Al-Hamdani, an Iraqi general in theRepublican Guard,also expressed negative opinion on the Chieftain's performance in combat, stating "The 16th Iranian Armored Division, which was equipped with Chieftain tanks, lost a battle against the 10th Iraqi Armored Brigade withT-72tanks. It is hard for an armored brigade to destroy a division in 12 hours but it happened; it was a disaster for the Iranians ".[32]Out of the 894 Chieftain tanks that had started the war only 200 were left by the war's end.[33]

The Chieftain remains in service in Iran, theMobarez tankbeing a locally upgraded version.

Kuwait and the Battle of the Bridges

edit

Kuwait had 143 Chieftains on the eve of the 1990 IraqiInvasion of Kuwait.Thirty-seven Chieftains of the Kuwaiti 35th Armored Brigade fought at theBattle of the Bridgesagainst elements of the Iraqi Hammurabi and Medina divisions before withdrawing over the Saudi border.[34]Kuwaiti 35th Armored Brigade failed to block the Mutla Pass and were ineffective at delaying the Iraqis, however they withdrew into the desert and became part ofJoint Command Forces Eastduring the 1991Gulf War.[35]

Besides those of the 35th Armored Brigade, the rest of the Kuwaiti Armed Forces' Chieftains (136 tanks)[36]were either destroyed or captured by the invading forces after they had been abandoned by their Kuwaiti crews when their ammunition ran out. After the liberation of Kuwait, the ageing Chieftains were replaced by the YugoslavM-84.[37]

Specifications (Mk. 5)

edit
  • Crew: 4
  • Combat weight: 55 tons
  • Overall length: 10.8 m (35 ft 5.2 in) gun forward
  • Hull length: 7.5 m (24 ft 7.3 in)
  • Height: 2.9 m (9 ft 6.2 in)
  • Width: 3.5 m (11 ft 5.8 in)
  • Powerplant:Opposed-piston engineLeyland L60(diesel, multi-fuel compression ignition) 750 bhp (560 kW)
  • Range: 500 km (310 mi)
  • Maximum road speed: 43 km/h (27 mph)
  • Cross-country speed: 30 km/h (19 mph)
  • Armour: turret front, 195 mm (7.7 in)RHA(60°)
Armament

Mark 1 and Mark 2 models had a coaxial Browning.50-inch (12.7 mm)ranging machine gunsprior to the introduction of thelaser rangefinderon the Mark 3/3 then later the Mark 5 model.

Equipment
  • TwinClansmanVRC 353 VHF Radio sets (1979 onward)
  • 1 C42 1 B47LarkspurVHFradios (pre 1979)
  • 2 X 6-barrel smoke dischargers on turret
  • Bulldozer blade (optional – fitted to one tank per squadron)[who said this?]

Variants

edit
FV4201 P1 – FV4201 P7
Prototypes. Seven built, 485 hp (362 kW)[i]L60Mk 1 or 485 hp (362 kW) L60 Mk 4,[ii]initial vehicles had internal exhaust silencers, short hull,[iii]small diameter road wheels. In an attempt at reducing the overall height of the vehicle the original design used road wheels of a smaller diameter which gave insufficient ground clearance. They were later replaced with Centurion road wheels of a larger diameter and by careful re-positioning of their mountings along with adjustment of the idler and final drive mountings resulted in a vehicle height only 1 in (25 mm) higher than with the original smaller wheels. Initial vehicle weight 45long tons(46 t); 49.5 long tons (50.3 t) for later vehicles, 1959-1962
Chieftain Mk 1 at theU.S. Army Armor & Cavalry CollectionatFort Benning(now Fort Moore) Georgia
Chieftain Mk.1
40 training vehicles for 1965–1966 with 585 hp (436 kW) L60 Mk 4 engine, strengthened TN12 gearbox,[iv]exhaust silencers moved to external armoured box on hull rear plate, larger 'Centurion' 31.6-inch (80 cm) diameter road wheels,[v]re-positioned final drive and idler wheel assemblies, two-piece commander's hatch cover, rubber track pads fitted for road protection inWest Germany,[vi]resilient rubber coaming around engine rear decking to prevent damage from gun with gun depression when turret traversed to the rear, stowage rack added to left rear of turret, dummy stowage 'bin' on front glacis and canvas cover over turret nose to conceal ballistic shapes,[vii]weight 50 long tons (51 t), Issued to1 RTRand5 RTRfor troop trials. All Mk.1 to Mk.1/4 vehicles were subsequently to be based atBovington CampandCatterick Garrison.11 short hull units converted to become Chieftain, Armoured Vehicle-Launched Bridge Mk.6 (CH AVLB Mk 6).
Chieftain Mk.1/2
Upgrade of Chieftain Mk.1 to Chieftain Mk.2 standard, fitted with 650 hp L60 Mk 4A2 engine, training use only
Chieftain Mk.1/3
Upgrade of Chieftain Mk.1, fitted with 650 hpL60 Mk 5A engine, training use only
Chieftain Mk.1/4
Upgrade of Chieftain Mk.1, fitted with 650 hp L60 Mk 6A engine and improved ranging gun,[viii]training use only.
Chieftain Mk.2
First service model with 650 hp L60 Mk 4A2 engine,L11A2or L11A3 main gun,[ix]NBCsystem fitted to rear of turret, revised turret stowage, one-piece commander's hatch cover, armour removed from searchlight cover, rigid flotation panels replaced by facility for deep wading, road speed 25 mph (40 km/h),[x]range 250 miles (400 km), weight 51.5 long tons (52.3 t), first vehicles issued to11th HussarsatHohnein West Germany in early 1967, improved 650 hp (480 kW) L60 Mk 5A engine fitted 1969
Chieftain Mk.3
Improved 650 hp L60 Mk 6A engine with two-stage air cleaner, improved auxiliary generator (Coventry ClimaxH30[xi]), better stowage, new No. 15 Mk 2 commander's cupola, road speed improved to 30 mph (48 km/h), range increased to 310 miles (500 km), weight 53 long tons (54 t), 1970
Chieftain Mk 3/2
Fitted with 720 hp (540 kW) L60 Mk 7A, 1971
Chieftain Mk 3/3
Fitted with 720 hp L60 Mk 7A, Improved main gun range finding,[xii]provision forBarr & StroudTLS (Tank Laser Sight) LF2[xiii]laser range finder,[xiv]With the LF2, the Chieftain became the first vehicle to be fitted with such a range-finding system.[38]1971
Chieftain Mk 3/G
Chieftain Mk.3 with engine induction through fighting compartment. Prototype only
Chieftain Mk.3/3P
Chieftain Mk 3/3 forIran,1973
Chieftain Mk 3/S
Production version of Chieftain Mk 3/G with commander's firing control[xv]
Chieftain Mk.4
Chieftain Mk.3 with increased fuel capacity forIsrael Defense Forces(IDF). Only two built. 1973.[xvi]The Chieftain Mk.4 project was halted at the behest of the British Government due to the perceived adverse effect the sale of Chieftain to Israel was likely to have on thebalance of powerwithin the region. Of the two Mk.4 vehicles built, one was scrapped, the other "02 SP 27" was fitted with anNCK Rapiercrane and used atKirkcudbright Training Area
Chieftain Mk.5
Final production variant, 750 hp (560 kW) L60 Mark 8A, with upgrades to the NBC protection system, weight 54 long tons (55 t), 1975
Chieftain Mk.5/5P
Chieftain Mk.5 forIran,1975. Engine later upgraded to 750 hp (560 kW) L60 Mk 10A, 1977
Chieftain Mk.5/2K
Chieftain Mk.5 forKuwait,1975

In 1975 all British Army earlier Marks of tanks except Mark 1s were upgraded to Chieftain Mk.5 standard as part of the 1975 "Totem Pole" programme. "Exercise Totem Pole" was carried out in six-to-nine phases depending on the Mark of vehicle being modified (Chieftain Mk.5's already had some of the required changes incorporated at the factory) between 1975 and 1979 and included fitment of theMarconiImproved Fire Control System (IFCS), replacement of the searchlight with the Barr & Stroud Thermal Observation Gunnery System (TOGS), along with modifications for usingFSAPDSammunition. Upon completion of each phase the vehicle received an additional suffix to the designation, e.g., "Chieftain Mk.3/S(Y)2" denoting a Mark 3/S having completed the first three phases of "Totem Pole". including addition of Clansman radios,[xvii]fitting of TLS, fitment of Muzzle Reference System (MRS)[xviii]upon replacement of L11A3 barrel with L11A5 barrel,[xix]and fitment of 750 hp L60 Mark 8A. These vehicles were re-designated Chieftain Mk's.6 to Mk.8.

Chieftain Mk.6
Chieftain Mk.2 upgraded to Chieftain Mk.5 standard, 1975[xx]
Chieftain Mk.7
Chieftain Mk.3 and Chieftain Mk 3/S upgraded to Chieftain Mk.5 standard, 1975[xxi]
Chieftain Mk.7C
Chieftain Mk.3 upgraded to Chieftain Mk.5 standard forOman
Chieftain Mk.8
Chieftain Mk.3/3 upgraded to Chieftain Mk.5 standard, 1975[xxii]

In 1977 the engines of all British Army vehicles were upgraded to the 750 hp L60 Mark 9A, followed by further upgrading with the L60 Mark 11A or L60 Mark 12A[xxiii]in 1978 as part of the 1977 "Dark Morn" and the 1978 "Sundance" programmes. "Exercise Sundance" concerned improvements in engine power, reliability, and other power train improvements, and was carried out in five main phases between 1976 and 1979. These, in themselves, had been preceded by "Dark Morn", "High Noon", and the initial "Fleetfoot" engine development programme which had completed in October 1971. Vehicles on which "Sundance" modifications had been carried out received an additional 'Z' suffix appended to their designations, the "Sundance" engines themselves were signified with a distinctive orange/yellow-coloured upper crankcase.

Chieftain Mk.9
Chieftain Mk.6 after completing all phases of "Totem Pole", 1979.
Chieftain Mk.10
Chieftain Mk.7 after completing all phases of "Totem Pole". Later upgraded with addition ofStillbrew Crew Protection Packagewhich added additional armour to the turret front and turret ring to increase turret frontal protection againstHEATrounds, specifically, the improved variants of the Soviet-madeRPG-7,etc., and consisted of conventional steel armour mounted on rubber pads to prevent vibration,[xxiv]1984–86
Chieftain Mk.11
Chieftain Mk.8 after completing all phases of "Totem Pole". Later upgraded with Stillbrew, 1984–86
Chieftain Mk.12
Chieftain Mk.5 after completing all phases of "Totem Pole". Later upgraded with Stillbrew, 1984–86
Chieftain Mk.12/13
Proposed further upgrades, cancelled when theChallenger 1was introduced.
Chieftain 800
Re-engined Iranian FV4030/1 Chieftain Mark 5/3P fitted with the 800 bhp (600 kW) Rolls-Royce CV8 TCA engine and the fully automatic TN12 Mk. 5 transmission.
Challenger 900 at theBovington Tank MuseumVehicle Conservation Center in 2014
Chieftain 900
Two Mk. 5/3 (P) were converted by Royal Ordnance Factories by fitting the 900 bhp (670 kW) Rolls-Royce Condor 900E engine and the fully automatic TN12-1000 version of the Chieftain's gearbox, hence the name of Chieftain 900. The two Chieftain 900 prototypes were built in April 1982 and were exhibited the same year at the British Army Equipment Exhibition (BAEE). They were not fitted with real Chobham armour but were mocked up with cosmetic sheet-metal cladding to simulate the Chobham armour package. The project was abandoned by 1986.

FV4030/1 Chieftain Mk. 5/3 (P) « Persia »
Also known as "Project 4030 Phase 1"or" Improved Chieftain ". The Mk. 5/3P featured the Tank Laser Sight (TLS), the Muzzle Reference System (MRS), a fully automatic controller for the TN12 gearbox, a 50 imp gal (230 L; 60 US gal) fuel capacity increase, thickened underbelly mine armour and shock absorbers fitted to the front and rear suspension units. 185 vehicles were built between August 1976 and late 1977/early 1978.
FV4030/2 Shir (Lion) 1
Also known as "4030 Phase 2".This tank formed Phase 2 of the Iranian contract for the supply of a new generation of MBTs (Phase 1 being for an Improved Chieftain). This project began in 1974. Shir 1 incorporated the Chieftain hull front and turret casting. The rear of the hull was reconfigured to accept a new power pack comprising Rolls-Royce CV12 1,200 hp (890 kW) (a turbocharged V12 four-stroke diesel engine), David Brown TN37 transmission and new cooling group. An improved bogie suspension (Super Horstmann), new final drives and tracks were included. The first vehicle-ran in April 1977 and no production deliveries had taken place when the project was cancelled in February 1979.
Khalid variant
Khalid
Also known as "4030 Phase 2 Jordan".The sale of 274 MBTs was negotiated with Jordan in June 1979 following the cancellation of the Iranian contract. The Khalid tank is based on the Shir 1 design with the addition of the Integrated Fire Control System (IFCS), Tank Laser Sight (TLS) and the No 84 Day/Night Sight. The first 125 were reworked Shir 1s and the remaining 149 were new production tanks. The order has been completed, the first being delivered in July 1981.
FV4030/3 Shir 2
Also known as "'4030 Phase 3'"Iranian variant. The Shir 2 represented a completely new-MBT incorporating Chobham armour (renamed" Pageant "to avoid diplomatic incident with the US government) to the hull and turret, with the rear of the hull similar in design to the Shir 1. The fire control, gun control and automotive systems were the same as Shir 1 with the following exceptions: Automotive - the option of adopting hydrogas suspension and command & control, the new No 84 commander's (PPE) day/night sight. The project began in 1974 and the first vehicle ran in October 1978. The production order was for 1,200 MBTs and production release given for 250 before cancellation in February 1979. Not delivered, the Shir 2 tanks becameFV4030/4 Challenger 1tanks after reworking at ROF Leeds.
Mobarez Tank
Iranian upgraded version of Chieftain.:
Chieftain/ T95
Development of the FV4201 Chieftain allowed for the interchangeability of guns with the U.S.T95 tankby means of exchanging turrets. The project was discontinued because of numerous problems with training crews to master two artillery systems. Equipped with a 90mm T208 (rifled) gun.
FV4211
Test vehicle using Chieftain automotive sub systems (including the 750 bhp (560 kW) L60 engine), embodied in a new aluminium hull and turret structure incorporating Chobham Armour (CA)[xxv]for the first time. The project began in October 1969. A feasibility study was completed by February 1970 which led to MVEE being asked to design and produce a prototype within a year. This timescale was achieved, the MVEE produced the first prototype in February 1971. Although the project was officially discontinued in 1972, research work within MVEE continued until 1974. A paper study on a Mk. 2 version was carried out and was considered during the FMBT (Future Main Battle Tank) studies in 1974.[xxvi]
ARRV
FV4204 ARV/ARRV
Armoured Recovery Vehicle, Armoured Recovery and Repair Vehicle.
FV4205 AVLB Mk5
Bridge-laying vehicle
An AVRE carryingfascineand towingPythononSalisbury Plain.
Chieftain AVRE (CHAVRE)
Armoured Vehicle Royal Engineers,twelve early "Willich Chieftain AVRE" vehicles converted by 32 Armoured Engineer Regiment and 21 Engineer Base Workshop of the Royal Engineers,Willich,1987, remaining 48 ex MBTs converted by Vickers Defence Ltd, 1991, to be a British Army combat engineering variant used by theRoyal Engineers.
Chieftain Fascine Layer
Four turret-less vehicles specially converted for layingfascines
Chieftain Marksman
Self-propelled anti-aircraft gunversion, equipped with theMarksman twin gun turret.
Chieftain Mineclearer
Mine-clearing development.
Chieftain Sabre
Twin 30 mm AA turret.
Chieftain SID
Chieftain Signature Integration Demonstrator.
Two vehicles modified from Chieftain Mk.12 forTRIGATtrials aimed at reducingbattlefield reflectivityand emissions
Chieftain Crazy Horse range target at Bovington in 2014
Chieftain Crazy Horse
Mobile Range Hard Target.
Modified from Chieftain Mk.1 with gun removed and incorporating Skyleader radio control. Remotely controlled range target for use with inert rounds. Used in conjunction with modifiedAlvis Stormercommand vehicle. One built. 1987.
Weapon Carriers
The Chieftain chassis was adapted to mount air defence weapons ( "Marksman" 2 x 35 mm cannon) and a 155 mm howitzer in a number of variants.

Operators

edit
Operators
Current
Former

Current

edit

Former

edit
  • United Kingdom:Used from 1965 to 1995.
  • Pahlavi Iran:in 1970s ordered 792 Chieftains including 707 Mark 3/3P and 5P MBTs, 71 Chieftain ARVs (fitted with Atlas cranes), 14 AVLBs, and 187 FV4030[41]
  • Jordan:274 Khalid delivered between 1981 and 1985 + 90 MK3/5 (captured Iranian tanks) from Iraq.[42][43]In storage.[31]
  • Iraq:50-75 tanks, captured from Iran, in service with Iraqi Army in 1990. Most upgraded to Khalid-level, with air conditioning for the crew and reinforced armour and night vision.[44]

Evaluation-only

edit
Chieftain Mk.2 trialled by the Dutch army, 1968.
  • Israel:Two prototypes for evaluationc. 1966.[45]
  • Netherlands:One Chieftain was tested alongside a Leopard between 15 January and 22 March 1968 by theDetachement ter Beproeving van Voertuigen( "Detachment for Testing of Vehicles" ) of theRoyal Netherlands Army;the tank was allocated British registration number 03 EB 81 and Dutch number KZ-99-65.[46][47]The Leopard was eventually selected largely because of the Chieftain's poor construction quality, especially the engine, which leaked so much oil that the engine compartment turned black.[48]

See also

edit

Tanks of comparable role, performance and era

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^Net engine horsepower rating; gross (SAE) figures are approximately 100 hp (75 kW) higher.
  2. ^All variants of the L60 were interchangeable and could be fitted to any Mark of vehicle. Vehicles at the factory were fitted with the latest variant of L60 being produced with earlier vehicles in service being upgraded to the current L60 variant as soon as sufficient numbers of the later engine variant became available, the removed earlier engines then being rebuilt to the current L60 standard where possible. Changing an engine usually took around 1.5 to two hours.
  3. ^The original design had the engine exhaust silencers mounted internally at the rear of the engine compartment however a re-design of the TN12 transmission resulted in an increase in gearbox length requiring the exhaust silencers to be resited in an external armoured box at the rear of the hull.
  4. ^Note: initial TN12's proved insufficiently robust on Chieftain prototype/pilot vehicles, having been based on a gearbox designed for an engine of lower power output for use in the abortiveFV300 project.
  5. ^Chieftain road wheels are the same as those of Centurion and are interchangeable.
  6. ^British Army Chieftains were destined for service with theBAORin the-then West Germany and would of necessity make much use of German roads.
  7. ^These and other modifications had been initially trialled on Prototype vehicles before the MK.1 design had been frozen for production.
  8. ^The ranging machine gun was a uniquely British method of ranging preferred over the optical range finders used by other nations. The gun uses ammunition ballistically-matched toHESHammunition at ranges out to 1,300 metres (2,500 metres in the Chieftain MK.3/3.) APDS rounds were aimed using aiming marks displaced from centre which when aligned with the bullet impact points compensated for the ammunition's flatter trajectory. The ranging machine gun was fired in three-round bursts
  9. ^Note; original gunnery requirement for FV4201 was for the ability to hit a vehicle-sized target at 1,000 yards (910 m) at night. Uponmetrificationranges quoted changed from using yards to using metres
  10. ^Vehicle speeds are governed.
  11. ^Known as the "Generating Unit Engine" (GUE), this engine was a three-cylinder opposed-piston two stroke diesel of 1 litre capacity. Its purpose was to drive a 24 volt, 500-amp, generator to provide electrical power when the main engine was not running.
  12. ^Ranging gun effectiveness improved to 2,500 metres range. All service Chieftains were subsequently upgraded with the LF2 laser range finder with ranging out to in excess of 5,000 metres. Vehicles upgraded with the LF2 TLS had an "L" suffice appended to the Mark No.
  13. ^Officially;Sight, Laser Rangefinder, Periscopic, A.F.V,, No. 1, Mark I
  14. ^The LF2 laser range finder had a ranging accuracy of +/- 10 m at 10,000 metres.
  15. ^Note; this allowed the tank commander to fire the main gun and was subsequently fitted to all service Chieftains.
  16. ^Standard fuel capacity for other vehicles was 195imperial gallons(890 L).
  17. ^Vehicles fitted with Clansman radios had a "C" suffix appended to the Mark No.
  18. ^The Muzzle Reference System uses a laser beam reflected from a mirror at the muzzle to measure minute dimensional changes in the barrel due to temperature, humidity, etc., which are then compensated-for in the Fire Control System. Thethermal sleevehad originally been developed to minimise such dimensional changes in the barrel which have an increasing effect on gun accuracy as ranges are increased. The effect on gunnery performance of the combined improvements in fire control would allow Chieftain gunners in practice shoots to achieve a first shot hit rate of 98% at ranges out to 1,500 meters. The MRS system was originally devised for the later abandonedFV4401 Contentiousproject.
  19. ^Note; barrels became worn and needed replacement after firing a specified number of rounds during accumulated practice shoots.
  20. ^On fitment of the TLS the designation changed to Mk.6/L.
  21. ^On fitment of the TLS the designation changed to Mk.7/L.
  22. ^On fitment of the TLS the designation changed to Mk.8/L.
  23. ^Mk 11A and Mk 12A engines were identical apart from minor difference in cylinder liner sealing
  24. ^The "Stillbrew" name is derived from the names of the developers, Col. Still, and John Brewer, of theMilitary Vehicles and Engineering Establishment.
  25. ^The armour was originally developed under the "Burlington" code name, later it became more widely known as "Chobham armour", after thelocationof the MVEE
  26. ^Vehicle registration number "03SP13".

References

edit
Citations
  1. ^Reynolds, Gerald(6 March 1967),"House of Commons Debates 6 March 1967 Defence (Army) Estimates 1967-68",Parliamentary Debates (Hansard),cc1029,retrieved21 May2016– via millbanksystems
  2. ^abcdefghiFor Mark 2 according to Norman,AFV Profile No. 19
  3. ^abcRichard Ogorkiewicz,Cold War, Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain's Defence Laboratories 1945–1990(2002), p.128-129, edited by Robert Bud & Philip Gummett, NMSI Trading Ltd,ISBN1-900747-47-2
  4. ^Taylor, Dick (26 August 2016).Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1966 to Present.J H Haynes & Co Ltd. p. 102.ISBN978-1-78521-059-4.
  5. ^Griffin, Robert (26 June 2024).Chieftain Main Battle Tank Development and active Service from Prototype To Mk.11 Part One.The Armor Journal (published 2015). p. 66.
  6. ^Robert Jackson,"101 Great Tanks",Rosen Publishing Group, 2010
  7. ^Anthony Tucker-Jones,"Armoured Warfare in the Korean War",Casemate Publishers, 2013, p. 61.
  8. ^Simon Dunstan,"Centurion Universal Tank 1943-2003"[permanent dead link‍],Osprey Publishing, 2003, p. 3.
  9. ^J. H. Joiner,"One More River To Cross",Pen and Sword, 1990
  10. ^Chris Bishop,"The encyclopedia of modern military weapons",Barnes & Noble Books, 1999, p. 30.
  11. ^Carter Malkasian,"The Korean War 1950-1953",Taylor & Francis, 2001, p. 52.
  12. ^abcdForty, George (1980).Chieftain.New York: Scribner.ISBN0-684-16433-7.OCLC6304211.
  13. ^AFV Profile No. 18 Chieftain and Leopard (Development), Profile Publishing
  14. ^"Israel and Depleted Uranium".Salem-News.Com. 13 May 2010.Retrieved26 November2013.
  15. ^"House of Commons Will Hold Debate on Issue of Sale of Chieftain Tanks to Libya".Jewish Telegraphic Agency. 17 June 1969.Retrieved26 November2013.
  16. ^"HowStuffWorks" Chieftain Main Battle Tank "".Science.howstuffworks.com. 20 November 2007.Retrieved26 November2013.
  17. ^abForty, George (1980).The Chieftain (Bk. 1) (Modern Combat Vehicles).Scribner.ISBN978-0684164335.
  18. ^Dunstan, S (1989),The Chieftain Tank,Arms & Armour Press Ltd
  19. ^abcdefgh"FV4201 Chieftain".Archived fromthe originalon 26 June 2015.Retrieved26 June2015.
  20. ^Griffin, Robert."Chieftain Main Battle Tank Development And Active Service From Prototype To Mk.11".The Armor Journal.2015(2).
  21. ^Dunstan 2003,p. 6.
  22. ^Nicholas Moran (26 August 2014).Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: Snapshots - Chieftain.World of Tanks. Event occurs at 4min 10sec.Retrieved10 November2015.
  23. ^abJP-4 dossier,Main Battle Tanks(1990), pp.35–36, edited by Ed.Ai. 1990, Florence
  24. ^"TESS:: David Gledhill".
  25. ^"The Way of the J. – British Phantom Aviation Group".
  26. ^"Middle East | Files reveal British-Israeli tank secrets".BBC News.2 January 2003.Retrieved26 November2013.
  27. ^"Trade Register",SIPRI,archived fromthe originalon 14 April 2010,retrieved31 December2009,(Search UK to Iran, 1950–2008)
  28. ^abCordesman, Anthony H. (1 April 2018).Iran's Developing Military Capabilities.CSIS.ISBN978-0-89206-469-4.Retrieved1 April2018– via Google Books.
  29. ^Dunstan, Simon (20 September 2012).Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965–2003.Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN978-1-78200-475-2.Retrieved1 April2018– via Google Books.
  30. ^Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965–2003,Osprey Publishing, 25 September 2003,ISBN978-1-84176-719-2[page needed]
  31. ^abChacko, Joseph P (22 July 2023)."Retro Revolution, Ukraine may buy Ancient Beast FV4201 Chieftain Tank for Military Makeover".Frontier India.Retrieved9 August2023.
  32. ^Woods, Kevin M.;Murray, Williamson;Nathan, Elizabeth A.; Sabara, Laila; Venegas, Ana M. (July 2010),Project 1946: Phase II,Institute for Defense Analyses
  33. ^Tan, Andrew T. H. (2014),The Global Arms Trade: A Handbook,Routledge, p. 126,ISBN978-1-85743-797-3
  34. ^Nelson, Major Robert A. (September–October 1995),"The Battle of the Bridges"(PDF),Armor,pp. 26–32, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 3 November 2013,retrieved7 July2014
  35. ^Kevin M. Woods (2008)."Iraqi Perspectives Project Phase II"Archived17 May 2019 at theWayback Machine.Um Al-Ma'arik (The Mother of All Battles): Operational and Strategic Insights from an Iraqi Perspective,Volume 1 (revised May 2008). Institute for Defense Analyses. pp. 117–119
  36. ^Танки в операции «Шок и трепет». А. Брусилов, Л. Карякин. Танкомастер 2003-08. стр.5 (in Russian)
  37. ^"The Battle of the Bridges"(PDF),Armor,U.S. Army Armor Center, pp. 26–32, September–October 1995, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 3 November 2013,retrieved7 July2014
  38. ^Finlayson, D. M.; Sinclair, B. (January 1999).Advances in Lasers and Applications.Taylor & Francis.ISBN978-0-7503-0632-4.
  39. ^The Military Balance 2023,p. 324
  40. ^Trade Register,SIPRI,archived fromthe originalon 14 April 2010,retrieved31 December2009,(Search UK to Oman, 1950–2008)
  41. ^Dunstan, Simon (20 September 2012).Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965–2003.Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN978-1-78200-475-2.Retrieved1 April2018– via Google Books.
  42. ^Trade Register,SIPRI,archived fromthe originalon 14 April 2010,retrieved31 December2009,(Search UK to Jordan, 1950–2008)
  43. ^Dowson, Nick (24 April 2010)."The MoD, the arms deal and a 30-year-old bill for £400m".The Independent.Retrieved9 August2023.
  44. ^Stephen Hughes, The Iraqi Threat and Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction, page 304
  45. ^הדרך לפרויקט המרכבה.www.mod.gov.il(in Hebrew).Retrieved27 July2024.
  46. ^"(front cover)",De Tank(in Dutch), no. 71, Zwolle: Twenot, April 1988
  47. ^"Landmacht beproeft tanks op Leusderheide"(in Dutch).Retrieved20 December2017.
  48. ^Smit, Willem (2008).De Leopard 1: Gepantserde vuist van de Koninklijke Landmacht[The Leopard 1: Armoured fist of the Royal Netherlands Army] (in Dutch). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of Military History. pp. 25–31.
Bibliography
  • International Institute for Strategic Studies(February 2023). The Military Balance 2023 (Report). Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Incorporated.ISBN978-1-032-50895-5.
  • Norman, Michael,AFV Profile No. 18 Chieftain and Leopard (Development),Profile Publishing
  • Dunstan, Simon (2003),Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965–2003,New Vanguard No.80, Osprey Publishing
edit
Wikimedia Commons has media related toChieftain tanks.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chieftain_(tank)&oldid=1257758528"