Wikipedia

Coalbed methane

(Redirected fromCoal seam gas)

Coalbed methane(CBMorcoal-bed methane),[1]coalbed gas,orcoal seam gas(CSG[1]) is a form ofnatural gasextracted fromcoalbeds.[2]In recent decades it has become an important source of energy in United States, Canada, Australia, and other countries.

A German methane detector used for coal mining in the 1960s.

The term refers tomethaneabsorbedinto the solid matrix of the coal. It is called 'sweet gas' because of its lack ofhydrogen sulfide.The presence of this gas is well known fromits occurrencein underground coal mining, where it presents a serioussafety risk.Coalbed methane is distinct from a typicalsandstoneor other conventional gas reservoir, as the methane is stored within the coal by a process calledadsorption.The methane is in a near-liquid state, lining the inside of pores within the coal (called the matrix). The open fractures in the coal (called the cleats) can also contain free gas or can be saturated with water.[citation needed]

Unlike much natural gas from conventional reservoirs, coalbed methane contains very little heavier hydrocarbons such aspropaneorbutane,and nonatural-gas condensate.It often contains up to a few percentcarbon dioxide.Coalbed methane is generally formed due to thermal maturation ofkerogenand organic matter, in contrast to coal seams with regulargroundwater rechargewhere methane is typically generated by microbial communities livingin situ.[3][4]

History

edit

Coalbed methane grew out of venting methane from coal seams. Some coal beds have long been known to be "gassy," and as a safety measure, boreholes were drilled into the seams from the surface, and the methane allowed to vent before mining.

Coalbed methane as a natural-gas resource received a major push from the US federal government in the late 1970s. Federal price controls were discouraging natural gas drilling by keeping natural gas prices below market levels; at the same time, the government wanted to encourage more gas production. The US Department of Energy funded research into a number of unconventional gas sources, including coalbed methane. Coalbed methane was exempted from federal price controls, and was also given a federal tax credit.

In Australia, commercial extraction of coal seam gas began in 1996 in theBowen BasinofQueensland.[5]

Reservoir properties

edit

Gas contained in coal bed methane is mainly methane and trace quantities ofethane,nitrogen,carbon dioxideand few other gases. Intrinsic properties of coal as found in nature determine the amount of gas that can be recovered.

Porosity

edit

Coalbedmethane reservoirsare considered as a dual-porosity reservoirs. Dual porosity reservoirs are reservoirs in which porosity related to cleats (natural fractures) are responsible for flow behavior and reservoir porosity of the matrix is responsible for the storage of gas. Theporosityof a coalbed methane reservoir can vary from 10%-20%; However, the cleat porosity of the reservoir is estimated to be in the range of 0.1%-1%[6]

Adsorption capacity

edit

Adsorption capacity of coal is defined as the volume of gas adsorbed per unit mass of coal usually expressed in SCF (standard cubic feet,the volume at standard pressure and temperature conditions) gas/ton of coal. The capacity to adsorb depends on the rank and quality of coal. The range is usually between 100 and 800 SCF/ton for most coal seams found in the US. Most of the gas in coal beds is in the adsorbed form. When the reservoir is put into production, water in the fracture spaces is pumped off first. This leads to a reduction of pressure enhancing desorption of gas from the matrix.[7]

Fracture permeability

edit

Fracture permeability acts as the major channel for the gas to flow. The higher the permeability, the higher the gas production. For most coal seams found in the US, the permeability lies in the range of 0.1–50 milliDarcys. The permeability of fractured reservoirs changes with the stress applied to them. Coal displays a stress-sensitive permeability and this process plays an important role during stimulation and production operations[8][citation needed].[9]Fracture permeability in Coalbed methane reservoir tends to increase with depletion of gas; in contrast to conventional reservoirs. This unique behavior is because of shrinking of coal, when methane is released from its matrix, which results in opening up of fractures and increased permeability.[10]It is also believed that due to shrinkage of coal matrix at lower reservoir pressures, there is a loss of horizontal stress in the reservoir which induces in-situ failure of coal. Such a failure has been attributed to sudden decrease in the fracture permeability of the reservoir[11][9]

Thickness of formation and initial reservoir pressure

edit

The thickness of the formation may not be directly proportional to the volume of gas produced in some areas.[citation needed]

For example, it has been observed in theCherokee Basinin Southeast Kansas that a well with a single zone of 1 to 2 feet (0.3 to 0.6 m) of pay can produce excellent gas rates, whereas an alternative formation with twice the thickness can produce next to nothing. Some coal (and shale) formations may have high gas concentrations regardless of the formation's thickness, probably due to other factors of the area's geology.[citation needed]

The pressure difference between the well block and the sand face should be as high as possible as is the case with any producing reservoir in general.[citation needed]

Other properties

edit

Other affecting parameters include coal density, initial gas-phase concentration, critical gas saturation, irreducible water saturation, relative permeability to water and gas at conditions of Sw = 1.0 and Sg = 1-Sw irreducible respectively.[citation needed]

Extraction

edit
Diagram of a coalbed methane well (US DOE)
Typical production profile of a coalbed methane well (USGS)
Main article:Coal bed methane extraction

To extract the gas, a steel-encased hole is drilled into the coal seam 100 to 1,500 metres (330 to 4,920 ft) below ground. As the pressure within the coal seam declines due to natural production or the pumping of water from the coalbed, both gas andproduced watercome to the surface through tubing. Then the gas is sent to a compressor station and into natural gas pipelines. The produced water is either reinjected into isolated formations, released into streams, used for irrigation, or sent to evaporation ponds. The water typically contains dissolved solids such assodium bicarbonateandchloridebut varies depending on the formation geology.[12]

Coalbed methane wells often produce at lower gas rates than conventional reservoirs, typically peaking at near 300,000 cubic feet (8,500 m3) per day (about 0.100 m³/s), and can have large initial costs. The production profiles of CBM wells are typically characterized by a "negative decline"in which the gas production rate initially increases as the water is pumped off and gas begins to desorb and flow. A dry CBM well is similar to a standard gas well.[citation needed]

The methane desorption process follows a curve (of gas content vs. reservoir pressure) called aLangmuir isotherm.The isotherm can be analytically described by a maximum gas content (at infinite pressure), and the pressure at which half that gas exists within the coal. These parameters (called the Langmuir volume and Langmuir pressure, respectively) are properties of the coal, and vary widely. A coal inAlabamaand a coal inColoradomay have radically different Langmuir parameters, despite otherwise similar coal properties.[citation needed]

As production occurs from a coal reservoir, the changes in pressure are believed to cause changes in the porosity and permeability of the coal. This is commonly known as matrix shrinkage/swelling. As the gas is desorbed, the pressure exerted by the gas inside the pores decreases, causing them to shrink in size and restricting gas flow through the coal. As the pores shrink, the overall matrix shrinks as well, which may eventually increase the space the gas can travel through (the cleats), increasing gas flow.[citation needed]

The potential of a particular coalbed as a CBM source depends on the following criteria. Cleat density/intensity: cleats are joints confined within coal sheets. They impart permeability to the coal seam. A high cleat density is required for profitable exploitation of CBM. Also important is the maceral composition:maceralis a microscopic, homogeneous, petrographic entity of a corresponding sedimentary rock. A high vitrinite composition is ideal for CBM extraction, while inertinite hampers the same.[citation needed]

The rank of coal has also been linked to CBM content: a vitrinite reflectance of 0.8–1.5% has been found to imply higher productivity of the coalbed.[citation needed]

The gas composition must be considered, because natural gas appliances are designed for gas with a heating value of about 1,000 BTU (British thermal units) per cubic foot, or nearly pure methane. If the gas contains more than a few percent non-flammable gases such asnitrogenorcarbon dioxide,either these will have to be removed or it will have to be blended with higher-BTU gas to achievepipeline quality.If the methane composition of the coalbed gas is less than 92%, it may not be commercially marketable.[citation needed]

Environmental impacts

edit

Methane

edit

As with all carbon-based fossil fuels, burning coalbed methane releases carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. Its effect as greenhouse gas was first analyzed by chemist and physicistSvante Arrhenius.CBM production also entails leaks of fugitive methane into the atmosphere. Methane is rated as having 72 times the effect on global warming per unit of mass than CO2.over 20 years, reducing to 25 times over 100 years and 7.5 times over 500 years.[13]Analysis oflife-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy sourcesindicates that generating electricity from CBM, as with conventional natural gas, has less than half the greenhouse gas effect of coal.[14]

Multiple Australian studies have indicated the long term negative environmental effects of coal seam gas extraction, both locally and globally.[15][16][17][18][19]

In the United States, methane escaping from coal during mining amounts to seven percent of totalmethane emissions.[20]Recovery of coal mine methane in advance of mining is seen as a major opportunity to reduce methane emissions.[citation needed]Companies likeCNX Resourceshave methane abatement programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from active and closed mines.[21]

Infrastructure

edit

CBM wells are connected by a network of roads, pipelines, and compressor stations. Over time, wells may be spaced more closely in order to extract the remaining methane.

Produced water

edit

Theproduced waterbrought to the surface as a byproduct of gas extraction varies greatly in quality from area to area, but may contain undesirable concentrations of dissolved substances such assalts,naturally present chemicals,heavy metalsandradionuclides.[22]In many producing regions the water is treated, such as through aReverse Osmosis plantand used beneficially for irrigation, water for livestock, urban and industrial uses, or dust suppression.

Pilliga Scrub

edit

In 2012 Eastern Star Gas was fined for "discharging polluting water containing high levels of salt into Bohena Creek" in the Pilliga Scrub.[23]There were "16 spills or leaks of contaminated water" including "serious spills of saline water into woodland and a creek."[24]In 2012, a NSW Legislative Council[25]inquiry criticised the use of open holding ponds, recommending that "the NSW Government ban the open storage of produced water."[25][26]

Powder River Basin

edit

Not all coalbed methane produced water is saline or otherwise undesirable. Water from coalbed methane wells in thePowder River Basinof Wyoming, US, commonly meets federal drinking water standards, and is widely used in the area to water livestock.[27]Its use for irrigation is limited by its relatively highsodium adsorption ratio.

Groundwater

edit

Depending on aquifer connectivity, water withdrawal may depress aquifers over a large area and affect groundwater flows.[28]In Australia, the CBM industry estimates extraction of 126,000 million litres (3.3×1010US gallons) to 280,000 million litres (7.4×1010US gallons) of groundwater per year; while theNational Water Commissionestimates extraction above 300,000 million litres (7.9×1010US gallons) a year.[22]

Power generation

edit

In 2012, theAspen Skiing Companybuilt a 3-megawatt methane-to-electricity plant inSomerset, Coloradoat Oxbow Carbon's Elk Creek Mine.[29]

Coalbed methane producing areas

edit

Australia

edit
See also:Coal in Australia

Coal Seam Gas resources are in the major coal basins in Queensland and New South Wales, with further potential resources in South Australia. Commercial recovery of coal seam gas (CSG) began in Australia in 1996. As of 2014, coal seam gas, from Queensland and New South Wales, made up about ten percent of Australia's gas production. Demonstrated reserves were estimated to be 33 trillion cubic feet (35 905 petajoules) as of January 2014.[30]

Canada

edit

In Canada,British Columbiais estimated to have approximately 90 trillion cubic feet (2.5 trillion cubic metres) of coalbed gas.Alberta,in 2013, was the only province with commercial coalbed methane wells and is estimated to have approximately 170 trillion cubic feet (4.8 trillion cubic metres) of economically recoverable coalbed methane, with overall reserves totaling up to 500 trillion cubic feet (14 trillion cubic metres).[31][32]

Coalbed methane is considered anon-renewable resource,although theAlberta Research Council,Alberta Geological Surveyand others have argued coalbed methane is arenewable resourcebecause the bacterial action that formed the methane is ongoing.[citation needed]This is subject to debate since it has also been shown that the dewatering that accompanies CBM production destroys the conditions needed for the bacteria to produce methane[33]and the rate of formation of additional methane is undetermined. This debate is currently causing aright of ownershipissue in theCanadian provinceofAlberta,as only non-renewable resources can legally be owned by the province.[34]

United Kingdom

edit

Although gas in place in Britain's coal fields has been estimated to be 2,900 billion cubic meters, it may be that as little as one percent might be economically recoverable. Britain's CBM potential is largely untested. Some methane is extracted by coal mine venting operations, and burned to generate electricity. Assessment by private industry of coalbed methane wells independent of mining began in 2008, when 55 onshore exploration licences were issued, covering 7,000 square kilometers of potential coalbed methane areas.IGas Energybecame the first in the UK to commercially extract coalbed methane separate from mine venting; as of 2012, the Igas coalbed methane wells at Doe Green, extracting gas for electrical generation, were the only commercial CBM wells in the UK.[35]The use of CBM (in GWh) for electricity generation in the UK is as shown.[36]

United States

edit
Main article:Coalbed methane in the United States

United States coalbed methane production in 2017 was 1.76 trillion cubic feet (TCF), 3.6 percent of all US dry gas production that year. The 2017 production was down from the peak of 1.97 TCF in 2008.[37]Most CBM production came from the Rocky Mountain states of Colorado, Wyoming, and New Mexico.

Kazakhstan

edit

Kazakhstan could witness the development of a large coalbed methane (CBM) sector over the coming decades, according to industry professionals.[38]Preliminary research suggests there may be as much as 900 billion m3 of gas in Kazakhstan's main coalfields – 85% of all reserves in Kazakhstan.

India

edit

Great Eastern Energy(GEECL) was the first company with a field development plan approved. With the completion of the drilling of 23 vertical production wells by GEECL, coalbed methane became commercially available in India on 14 July 2007 with CNG priced at ₹30 per kg. Initially 90% of the CBM would be distributed as CNG gas to fuel vehicles.

GEECL is responsible for Southeast Asia's first CBM station and is also locating one in theWest Bengalcity ofAsansol.

Prashant Modi, President and Chief Operating Officer of GEECL, said, "With the nation requiring higher energy sources to sustain its development pace, we are confident that CBM will play an important role as one of the prime energy sources for the future generations."[39]

Essar Group's Essar Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Ltd.'s CBM portfolio includes 5 blocks. Currently, only one of them, Raniganj East, is currently operational. The others include Rajmahal in Jharkhand, Talcher and Ib Valley in Odisha and Sohagpur in Madhya Pradesh. The 5 blocks possess an estimated 10 trillion cubic feet (CBF) of CBM reserves.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ab"Jargon Buster".BG Group. Archived fromthe originalon 25 September 2012.Retrieved18 July2010.
  2. ^Coal Gas,www.clarke-energy.com, retrieved 25.11.2011
  3. ^Laubach, S. E; Marrett, R. A; Olson, J. E; Scott, A. R (1 February 1998)."Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review".International Journal of Coal Geology.35(1): 175–207.Bibcode:1998IJCG...35..175L.doi:10.1016/S0166-5162(97)00012-8.ISSN0166-5162.
  4. ^Saurabh, Suman; Harpalani, Satya (15 March 2018)."Modeling of microbial methane generation from coal and assessment of its impact on flow behavior".Fuel.216:274–283.doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.015.ISSN0016-2361.
  5. ^Geoscience Australia,Coal seam gasArchived16 October 2013 at theWayback Machine,accessed 10 October 2013.
  6. ^C.R. Clarkson, Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Review of theory and best practices, International Journal of Coal Geology, Volume 109, 2013, Pages 101-146, ISSN 0166-5162,https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.002
  7. ^Moore, Tim A. (1 November 2012)."Coalbed methane: A review".International Journal of Coal Geology.101:36–81.Bibcode:2012IJCG..101...36M.doi:10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.011.ISSN0166-5162.
  8. ^McKee, C. R., Bumb, A. C., & Koenig, R. A. (1 March 1988). Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and Other Geologic Formations. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/12858-PA
  9. ^abS. Saurabh, S. Harpalani, V.K. Singh, Implications of stress re-distribution and rock failure with continued gas depletion in coalbed methane reservoirs, International Journal of Coal Geology, Volume 162, 2016, Pages 183-192, ISSN 0166-5162,https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2016.06.006.
  10. ^Sevket Durucan, Mustafa Ahsanb, Ji-Quan Shia, Matrix shrinkage and swelling characteristics of European coals, Energy Procedia, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3055-3062, ISSN 1876-6102,https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.084.
  11. ^Okotie, V. U., & Moore, R. L. (1 May 2011). Well-Production Challenges and Solutions in a Mature, Very-Low-Pressure Coalbed-Methane Reservoir. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/137317-PA
  12. ^"Coalbed Methane Extraction: Detailed Study Report"(PDF).EPA.December 2010. pp. 63–70.
  13. ^IPCCFourth Assessment Report,Table 2.14, Chap. 2, p. 212
  14. ^Timothy J. Skone,Life-cycle analysisArchived5 June 2013 at theWayback Machine,12 May 2011.
  15. ^Assan, Sabina; Ember: coal to clean (8 July 2022)."Tackling Australia's coal mine methane problem".Lock the Gate Alliance.Archived from the original on 29 January 2023.Retrieved29 January2023.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  16. ^"Salt in the wound: An assessment of the scale of the NSW Government's planned expansion of Santos' Narrabri coal seam gas field".Lock the Gate Alliance.31 August 2021. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023.Retrieved29 January2023.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  17. ^Forcey, Tim (17 May 2017)."Infrared video-recording methane emissions in the Queensland coal seam gas fields, February 2017".Lock the Gate.Archived from the original on 29 January 2023.Retrieved29 January2023.{{cite news}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  18. ^Davey, Alistair; Fisher, Roger; Pegasus Economics; Lock the Gate Alliance (1 August 2019)."Report on the Narrabri gas project".Lock the Gate.Archived from the original on 3 March 2023.Retrieved25 February2023.{{cite news}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  19. ^Lock the Gate Alliance (23 March 2016). Wright, Ian (ed.)."Free-loaders: air and water pollution from NSW coalmines".Lock the Gate Alliance.Archived from the original on 25 February 2023.Retrieved25 February2023.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  20. ^Krawczyk, Kathryn (28 April 2021)."Methane from abandoned coal mines could fight climate change".Energy News Network.Retrieved9 November2022.
  21. ^"CNX Looking to Capture Methane from Appalachia Operations for Biodegradable Plastic".Natural Gas Intelligence.15 July 2022.Retrieved9 November2022.
  22. ^ab"The coal seam gas rush".Australia: ABC News. April 2012.Retrieved26 September2013.
  23. ^"Eastern Star Gas fined for pollution in the Pilliga".Office of Environment and Heritage website.Office of Environment and Heritage. 6 July 2012.Retrieved26 September2012.
  24. ^Validakis, Vicky (13 June 2013)."Santos to be prosecuted for Pilliga pollution".Australian Mining.Cirrus Media.Retrieved26 September2013.
  25. ^ab"Coal seam gas (Inquiry)".Parliament of New South Wales website.State of New South Wales (NSW Parliament). 2012. Archived fromthe originalon 30 October 2012.Retrieved26 September2013.
  26. ^Coutts, Sharona (26 October 2012)."Pillaging The Pilliga".The Global Mail.Digital Global Mail. Archived fromthe originalon 28 October 2012.Retrieved26 September2013.
  27. ^US EPA, [Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources of Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs, The Powder River Basin], June 2004, EPA 816-R-04-003 Attachment 5.
  28. ^Montana State University; Frequently Asked Questions; Coal Bed Methane (CBM)Archived24 February 2008 at theWayback Machine
  29. ^Ward, Bob (21 November 2014)."How Aspen Skiing Co. became a power company".Aspen Times.Retrieved21 December2019.
  30. ^Geoscience Australia, Australian Energy Resource Assessment, 2014.http://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/energy/resources/australian-energy-resource-assessment
  31. ^John Squarek and Mike Dawson,Coalbed methane expands in Canada,Oil & Gas Journal, 24 July 2006, p.37-40.
  32. ^"Government of Alberta".19 September 2023.
  33. ^"Renewable Natural Gas? The Discovery of Active Methane Biogenesis in Coalbeds".Green Car Congress. 16 November 2004.Retrieved21 December2011.
  34. ^"TELUS, news, headlines, stories, breaking, canada, canadian, national".Mytelus.com.Retrieved21 December2011.[permanent dead link‍]
  35. ^DECC,The Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources of Britain's Onshore Basins – Coalbed MethaneArchived11 May 2015 at theWayback Machine,2012.
  36. ^"Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES)".gov.uk/government/statistics/.Archivedfrom the original on 15 July 2015.Retrieved5 January2022.
  37. ^US Energy Information Administration,Coalbed methane production,accessed 9 October 2013.
  38. ^"Coal bed methane in Kazakhstan".worldcoal.com. 23 July 2014. Archived fromthe originalon 28 July 2014.Retrieved28 July2014.
  39. ^"Coal Bed Methane in India"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 4 March 2016.Retrieved21 March2015.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalbed_methane&oldid=1255577511"