Wikipedia

Dignity of risk

Dignity of riskis the idea thatself-determinationand the right to take reasonable risks are essential fordignityandself esteemand so should not be impeded by excessively-cautiouscaregivers,concerned about theirduty of care.

The concept is applicable to adults who are under care such aselderlypeople,[1]people living withdisability,[2]and people withmental healthproblems.[3]It has also been applied to children,[4]including those living with disabilities.[5][6]

History

edit

Ideas that would later develop into the concept of dignity of risk arose during the late 1960s in Sweden. Dr. Bengt Nirje formed a group for people both with and withoutintellectual disabilities.The group would meet to plan an outing, go on the outing, and meet afterwards to discuss how the meeting went. This allowed people with intellectual disabilities to have some 'normal experiences' in the community, and members without intellectual disabilities were told that the participants with disabilities should make their own decisions without interference, even if mistakes were made. Dr. Nirje once said, "to be allowed to be human means to be allowed to fail." This group would go on to inspireself advocacygroups around the world.[7]

The concept was first articulated in a 1972 articleThe dignity of risk and the mentally retardedbyRobert Perske:

Overprotection may appear on the surface to be kind, but it can be really evil. An oversupply can smother people emotionally, squeeze the life out of their hopes and expectations, and strip them of their dignity. Overprotection can keep people from becoming all they could become. Many of our best achievements came the hard way: We took risks, fell flat, suffered, picked ourselves up, and tried again. Sometimes we made it and sometimes we did not. Even so, we were given the chance to try. Persons with special needs need these chances, too. Of course, we are talking about prudent risks. People should not be expected to blindly face challenges that, without a doubt, will explode in their faces. Knowing which chances are prudent and which are not – this is a new skill that needs to be acquired. On the other hand, a risk is really only when it is not known beforehand whether a person can succeed. The real world is not always safe, secure, and predictable, it does not always say "please," "excuse me", or "I'm sorry". Every day we face the possibility of being thrown into situations where we will have to risk everything … In the past, we found clever ways to build avoidance of risk into the lives of persons living with disabilities. Now we must work equally hard to help find the proper amount of risk these people have the right to take. We have learned that there can be healthy development in risk taking and there can be crippling indignity in safety![8]

In 1980, the concept was relied upon byJulian Wolpert,Professor of Geography, Public Affairs, and Urban Planning atPrinceton University,to support his argument in a paper, "The Dignity of Risk",[9]which has since been described as "seminal".[10]Wolpert's argument was that a paternalistic approach to people living with disability, prioritizing safeguarding over the rights of individuals to independent decision-making, is a limitation on personal freedom.[10]

Conflict with duty of care

edit

Allowing people under care to take risks is often perceived to be in conflict with the caregivers'duty of care.Finding a balance between these competing considerations can be difficult when formulating policies and guidelines for caregiving. The concept of the Least Restrictive Alternative emphasizes minimizing intrusion into the lives of those we support. In this framework, autonomy and independence are upheld, and information is offered to facilitate informed decision-making as much as possible.[11][2][8][12][13]

Problems of overprotection

edit
Wheelchair rugbyis afull-contact sportplayed by wheelchair users. In spite of the protective features of the wheelchairs, the risk of injury is significant.[14]

Protection is often used to justify violating the rights of people with disabilities. To deny someone the opportunity to make mistakes is to violate the right to make decisions about their own lives.[15]Many self-advocates see the dignity of risk as a human right. Max Barrows, a self-advocate from Vermont, says "Life is about learning from the mistakes that you make I appreciate and we appreciate protection from people, but please don't protect us too much or at all from living our lives."[16]Protection has been used to justify institutionalization, sheltered workshops and other segregated settings. Many institutions were and are sites of abuse, neglect and sexual assault.[17]Many people with disabilities are also placed under guardianship, which is when someone else makes decisions about their life, including where they live, how they spend their money, and the health care they receive. This is done to stop people from making "bad choices." Many disability advocates argue for the replacement of guardianship with supported decision making, where people with disabilities make their own decisions with support and accommodations.[18]

Overprotection of people with disabilities causes lowself-esteemand underachievement because of lowered expectations that come with overprotection. Internalisation of low expectations causes the person with a disability to believe that they are less capable than others in similar situations.[19]

In elderly people, overprotection can result in learned dependency and a decreased ability forself-care:[20]

"It is possible to deliver physical care that has positive outcomes and returns a person to full function, yet, if during that care they have not been involved, allowed to make choices and respectfully assisted with activities of daily living, it may be possible to cause psychological damage through undermining that person's dignity."[21]

Disability rights movement

edit

The right to fail and the dignity of risk are basic tenets of multiple movements, including theindependent livingmovement[22]and the self advocacy movement.[7]

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

edit

The first of eight "guiding principles" of the United Nations'Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilitiesstates: "Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one's own choices, and independence of persons."[23]

Article 12 of the Convention states that states "shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life" and that "shall take all appropriate and effective measures to ensure the equal right of persons with disabilities to own or inherit property, to control their own financial affairs and to have equal access to bank loans, mortgages and other forms of financial credit, and shall ensure that persons with disabilities are not arbitrarily deprived of their property."[24][25]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^Norman Hermant (2015-11-22)."Dignity of Risk: Elderly should be allowed to do 'risky' activities to improve lifestyle, professor says - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)".Abc.net.au.Retrieved2017-04-19.
  2. ^ab"Duty of Care and Dignity of Risk - Coda South - Choice. Opportunity. Diversity. Ability".Coda South. 2013-09-15. Archived fromthe originalon 2017-09-08.Retrieved2017-04-19.
  3. ^Craig Parsons (2009-05-02)."Dignity of Risk: The right to self-governance for people with mental illness".Openforum.Retrieved2017-04-19.
  4. ^Cook, Victoria Ann (2010)."Chapter 19: 'The teachers seemed a bit obsessive with health and safety': fieldwork risk and the social construction of childhood".In Holt, Louise (ed.).Geographies of Children, Youth and Families: An International Perspective.Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge. pp. 279–291.ISBN9781135191252.Retrieved27 December2018.
  5. ^Stillman, William (2007).Autism Answer Book: More Than 300 of the Top Questions Parents Ask.Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc. pp. 197–199.ISBN9781402219375.Retrieved27 December2018.
  6. ^Green, Jarrod (2017).I'm OK! Building Resilience through Physical Play.St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press. pp. 63–65.ISBN9781605544526.Retrieved27 December2018.
  7. ^ab"The Origin of the Self Advocacy Movement".Parallels in Time: A History of Developmental Disabilities.Retrieved22 January2023.
  8. ^abPerske, R (February 1972). "The dignity of risk and the mentally retarded".Mental Retardation.10(1): 24–7.PMID5059995.
  9. ^Wolpert, Julian(1980). "The Dignity of Risk".Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.5(4): 391–401.Bibcode:1980TrIBG...5..391W.doi:10.2307/622018.JSTOR622018.
  10. ^abvon Benzon, Nadia; van Blerk, Lorraine (2017)."Research relationships and responsibilities: 'Doing' research with 'vulnerable' participants: introduction to the special edition"(PDF).Social & Cultural Geography.18(7): 895–905.doi:10.1080/14649365.2017.1346199.
  11. ^Wendel Bamford (2016-05-04)."Duty of care and the dignity of risk | Interchange".Interchangewa.org.au.Retrieved2017-04-19.
  12. ^Jackie Keast (2016-05-11)."A balancing act: dignity of risk vs. duty of care".Australian Ageing Agenda.Retrieved2017-04-19.
  13. ^Ibrahim, Joseph E; Davis, Marie-Claire (September 2013). "Impediments to applying the 'dignity of risk' principle in residential aged care services".Australasian Journal on Ageing.32(3): 188–193.doi:10.1111/ajag.12014.PMID24028460.S2CID206981816.
  14. ^Bauerfeind, Joanna; Koper, Magdalena; Wieczorek, Jacek; Urbański, Piotr; Tasiemski, Tomasz (1 January 2015)."Sports Injuries in Wheelchair Rugby – A Pilot Study".Journal of Human Kinetics.48(1): 123–132.doi:10.1515/hukin-2015-0098.PMC4721614.PMID26834880.
  15. ^Mukherjee, Debjani (2022)."Editor's Introduction: Disability, Social Justice, and Dignity of Risk at 50 Years".Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.65(2): 157–161.doi:10.1353/pbm.2022.0010.ISSN1529-8795.PMID35938422.S2CID251400013.
  16. ^"Dignity Of Risk".YouTube.23 May 2018.
  17. ^Morgan, Cameron."The Unacknowledged Crisis of Violence Against Disabled People – Center for Disability Rights".Center for Disability Rights.
  18. ^"Ending Guardianship: How State Governments Take Away Our Right to Make Choices and How We Can Stop It - Autistic Self Advocacy Network".Autistic Self Advocacy Network.25 June 2020.
  19. ^Sanders, KY (2006). "Overprotection and lowered expectations of persons with disabilities: the unforeseen consequences".Work (Reading, Mass.).27(2): 181–8.PMID16971765.
  20. ^Kennie, David C. (1993).Preventive care for elderly people.Cambridge, Angleterre: Cambridge University Press. p.24.ISBN9780521436298.
  21. ^Fenton, Elizabeth; Mitchell, Theresa (June 2002). "growing old with dignity: a concept analysis".Nursing Older People.14(4): 19–21.doi:10.7748/nop2002.06.14.4.19.c2212.PMID12094515.
  22. ^Deegan, Patricia E. (1992). "The Independent Living Movement and people with psychiatric disabilities: Taking back control over our own lives".Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal.15(3): 3–19.doi:10.1037/h0095769.
  23. ^"Guiding Principles of the Convention".www.un.org.United Nations - Division for Social Policy and Development.
  24. ^"The Right to Make Choices: New Resource on Supported Decision-Making - Autistic Self Advocacy Network".Autistic Self Advocacy Network.1 February 2016.Retrieved22 January2023.
  25. ^"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles | United Nations Enable".United Nations.Retrieved22 January2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dignity_of_risk&oldid=1252649982"