TheEntomophthoralesare anorderoffungithat were previously classified in the classZygomycetes.A new subdivision,Entomophthoromycotina,in 2007, wascircumscribedfor them.[1]

Entomophthorales
Entomophthora muscae
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Entomophthoromycota
Class: Entomophthoromycetes
Order: Entomophthorales
Winter 1880
Families

Ancylistaceae
Completoriaceae
Entomophthoraceae
Meristacraceae
Neozygitaceae

Synonyms
  • AncylistalesVines 1888 ex Schröter 1893
  • AncylistineaeSchröter 1893

Most species of the entomophthorales are pathogens ofinsects.A few attacknematodes,mites,andtardigrades,and some (particularly species of the genusConidiobolus) are free-livingsaprotrophs.

The name "entomophthorales" is derived from theAncient Greekfor insect destroyer (entomo-= referring to insects, andphthor= "destruction" ). Named after genusEntomophthorain 1856.[2]

Green peach aphid,Myzus persicae,killed by the fungusPandora neoaphidis(Zygomycota:Entomophthorales) Scale bar = 0.3 mm.

Highlighted species

edit

Biology

edit

Most species of the entomophthorales produce ballistic asexual spores that are forcibly discharged. When not landing on a suitable host, these spores can germinate to make one of several alternate spore forms, including a smaller version of the original spore, or (in some species) an adhesive spore elevated on a very slenderconidiophorecalled acapilliconidiophore.

Classification

edit

Debates have centred on whether theBasidiobolaceaeshould be included in the entomophthorales, or raised to ordinal status.Molecular systematicsapproaches so far give an ambiguous answer. Some analyses suggest theBasidiobolaceaeare more closely related to certain chytrid fungi than to the entomophthorales.[4]and place it within theChytridialesorder.[5]Others find weak support to maintain them in the Entomophthorales.[6]Morphological characters can be found to support either hypothesis.

References

edit
  1. ^Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, et al. (May 2007). "A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi".Mycol. Res.111(Pt 5): 509–47.CiteSeerX10.1.1.626.9582.doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004.PMID17572334.
  2. ^Fresenius, G. 1856. Botanische Zeitung 14, 882-883.
  3. ^Dromph KM, Eilenberg J, Esbjerg P (November 2001). "Natural occurrence of entomophthoralean fungi pathogenic to collembolans".J. Invertebr. Pathol.78(4): 226–31.doi:10.1006/jipa.2002.5077.PMID12009804.
  4. ^Nagahama, T.; Sato, H.; Shimazu, M.; Sugiyama, J. (1995). "Phylogenetic divergence of the entomophthoralean fungi: evidence from nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences".Mycologia.87(2): 203–209.doi:10.2307/3760906.JSTOR3760906.
  5. ^Carl A. Batt and Pradip Patel (Editors)Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology (2014),p. 59, atGoogle Books
  6. ^James, T. Y.; Kauff, F.; Schoch, C. L.; et al. (2006). "Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny".Nature.443(7113): 818–823.doi:10.1038/nature05110.PMID17051209.
edit