Fan fictionorfanfiction,also known asfan fic,fanfic,ficorFF,isfictionwritten in anamateurcapacity byfansas a form offan labor,unauthorized by, but based on, anexisting work of fiction.The author usescopyrighted characters,settings, or otherintellectual propertiesfrom the original creator(s) as a basis for their writing and can retain the original characters and settings, add their own, or both. Fan fiction ranges in length from a few sentences to novel-length and can be based on fictional and non-fictional media, includingnovels,movies,comics,television shows,musical groups,cartoons,animeandmanga,andvideo games.
Fan fiction is rarely commissioned or authorized by the original work's creator or publisher or professionally published. It mayinfringe on the original author's copyright,depending on the jurisdiction and on legal questions, such as whether or not it qualifies as "fair use"(seeLegal issues with fan fiction). The attitudes of authors andcopyright ownersof original works towards fan fiction have ranged from encouragement to indifference or disapproval, and have occasionally responded with legal action.
The term came into use in the 20th century ascopyright lawsbegan to distinguish between stories using established characters that were authorized by the copyright holder and those that were not.[1]
Fan fiction is defined by being related to its subject'scanonicalfictional universe,either staying within those boundaries but not being part of the canon, or being set in analternative universe.[2]Thus, what is considered "fanon" is separate from canon. Fan fiction is often written and published among fans, and as such does not usually cater to readers without knowledge of the original media.
Definition
editThe termfan fictionhas been used in print as early as 1938; in the earliest known citations, it refers to amateur-writtenscience fiction,as opposed to "pro fiction".[3][4]The term also appears in the 1944Fancyclopedia,an encyclopaedia offandomjargon,in which it is defined as "fiction about fans, or sometimes about pros, and occasionally bringing in some famous characters from [science fiction] stories". It also mentions that the term is "sometimes improperly used to mean fan science fiction; that is, ordinaryfantasypublished in afan magazine".[4][5]
History
editBefore copyright
editBefore the adoption of copyright in the modern sense, it was common for authors to copy characters or plots from other works. For instance,Shakespeare's playsRomeo and Juliet,Much Ado About Nothing,Othello,As You Like ItandThe Winter's Talewere based on recent works by other authors of the time.[6]
In 1614,Alonso Fernández de Avellanedawrote a sequel to Cervantes'Don Quixotebefore he had finished and published his own second volume.
19th century
editAmong 19th-century literature that has been subject to depictions not authorized by the original author includeBram Stoker'sDracula's depiction in the translated adaptationPowers of Darkness.[7]The works ofJane Austenremain among the most popular works for unauthorized adaptations,[8]with a notable example ofJane Austen fan fictionbeingOld Friends and New Fancies.Many unauthorized stories ofSherlock HolmesbyArthur Conan Doylehave been created, includingThe Adventure of the Two CollaboratorsbyJ. M. Barrie.[9]Other notable works includeThe Space MachineandMorlock Night,respectively based onThe War of the WorldsandThe Time MachinebyH. G. Wells;A New Alice in the Old Wonderland,based onAlice's Adventures in WonderlandbyLewis Carroll;andWide Sargasso Sea,based onJane EyrebyCharlotte Bronte.[10]
Star Trekfandom
editThe modern phenomenon of fan fiction as an expression offandomand fan interaction was popularized and defined by theStar Trekfandomand itsfanzines,which were published in the 1960s. The firstStar Trekfanzine,Spockanalia(1967), contained some fan fiction; many others followed its example.[11]: 1 These fanzines were produced using offset printing andmimeographyand mailed to other fans or sold atscience fiction conventionsfor a small fee to cover the cost of production. Unlike other aspects of fandom, women were the primary authors of fan fiction; 83% ofStar Trekfan fiction authors were female by 1970, and 90% by 1973.[12]One scholar states that fan fiction "fill[s] the need of a mostly female audience for fictional narratives that expand the boundary of the official source products offered on the television and movie screen."[13]
World Wide Web
editFan fiction has become more popular and widespread since the advent of the World Wide Web. According to one estimate, fan fiction comprises one-third of all book-related content on the internet.[14]In addition to traditional fanzines and conventions,Usenet newsgroupsandelectronic mailing listswere established for fan fiction and fan discussion. Online, searchable archives of fan fiction were also created, with these archives initially being non-commercial hand-tended and specific to a fandom or topic. These archives were followed by non-commercial automated databases. In 1998, the non-profit siteFanFiction.Netwas launched, which allowed anyone to upload content in any fandom.[15]The ability to self-publish fan fiction in an easily accessible archive that did not require insider knowledge to join, as well as the ability to review stories directly on the site, led the site to quickly gain popularity.[16] A popular example of modern fan fiction isE. L. James'sFifty Shades of Grey,which was originally written as fan fiction for theTwilightseries and featured Bella and Edward. To avoid copyright infringement, James changed the characters' names to Ana and Christian for the purposes of her novels,[17]a practice known as 'pulling-to-publish'.[18]Anna Todd's 2013 fan fictionAfter,about the boy bandOne Direction,secured a book and movie deal with renamed characters in 2014.[19][20]A movie adaptation,After,was released on April 12, 2019.
On May 22, 2013, online retailerAmazonlaunched a new publishing service,Kindle Worlds,which allowed fan fiction of certain licensed media properties to be sold in theKindle Store,with terms including 35% of net sales for works of 10,000 words or more and 20% for short fiction ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 words. However, this arrangement included restrictions on content, copyright violations, poor document formatting, and use of misleading titles.[21]Amazon shut down Kindle Worlds in August 2018.[22]
Japanese dōjinshi
editA similar trend began inJapanin the 1960s and 1970s, asdōjinshi,independently publishedmangaand novels, were published bydōjincircles, with many being based on existingmanga,anime,andvideo gamefranchises.Manga artistssuch asShotaro IshinomoriandFujiko Fujioformed dōjin groups, such as Fujio's New Manga Party(Tân mạn họa đảng,Shin Manga-tō).At the time, artists used dōjin groups to make their debut as professional artists. This changed in the following decades, asdōjinshibecame more popular and dōjin groups formed in groups such as school clubs. This culminated in 1975 with theComiket,a convention in Tokyo that helped to establish the fandom.
Demographics
editA 2010 study found that 75.2% of account holders onFanFiction.Netallowed the website to disclose their location and that 57% of accounts originated from theUnited States,followed by 9.2% created in theUnited Kingdom,5.6% inCanada,and 4% inAustralia.[23]
A 2020 study ofArchive Of Our Ownusers[24]found that of the surveyed profiles that stated a nationality, 59.7% were located in North America, 16.1% in Great Britain and an additional 10% in Mainland Europe, 6.3% in Oceania, 2.8% in Scandinavia, 2.2% in Asia, 1.8% in South America and the Caribbean, and 0.2% in the Middle East. The study did not include profiles written in Chinese, Greek, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Russian, or Turkish.[24]
Sex and gender
editA 2020 study of Harry Potter fan fiction writers onArchive of Our Ownfound that of the users who disclosed their gender in their profiles, 50.4% were female orfemme-leaning and 13.4% were masculine or masc-leaning. 11% of users weretransgender,21% identified asnonbinary,genderfluid,and/orgenderqueer,and an additional 3.9% stated that they identified asagenderor genderless.[24]
Age
editThe study also found that fan fiction writers tend to be in their early to mid-20s. Of these writers, 56.7% were university students and young adults, 21.3% were 30 years or older, 19.8% were teenagers, and 0.2% were of retirement age.[24]
Categories and terms
editThis sectionneeds additional citations forverification.(July 2020) |
Genres
editIn addition to the "regular"list of genres,there are some genres particularly associated with fan fiction. These genres can overlap and include:
Angst
editStories with anangst-ridden mood that focus on a character or characters who are brooding, sorrowful, or in anguish.
Alternative universe (AU)
editStories that feature characters set in a universe other than their canonical one.[25]There are several types of alternative universe: it may make dramatic changes to the setting, such as a "fantasy AU" that places characters from a non-fantasy canon in a world of magic; change characterization, which is often referred to as someone being "out of character" (OOC) rather than a proper AU; or change major plot events to suit the author's purposes, such as in afix-it fic.[26]
Soulmate AU
editStories that feature characters in a world, often very similar to canon, wheresoulmatesare real. Common mechanics include a person having their soulmate's name written on their skin at birth or a specific change that occurs when two soulmates see or touch each other for the first time. The most common trope in this genre is a character being convinced that they do not have, want, or deserve a soulmate, only to be proven wrong as they fall in love.
Time travel AU
editStories in which a character is sent back in time to get a second chance while having knowledge of the original plot. It is also called "Peggy Sue" after the moviePeggy Sue Got Married,in which this scenario happens to the titular character. "Groundhog Day", named afterthe film,is a variation of this trope in which time travel happens repeatedly, usually until the time traveler "gets it right".
Crossover
editStories that feature characters, items, or locations from multiple fandoms. Another type of crossover is "fusion fic", in which the two universes are merged into one.
Darkfic
editStories that are darker or more depressing than the original, often done in contrast to them. This is sometimes done with media that is intended to be light-hearted or for children.[27]Darkfic can also refer to content that is "intentionally disturbing", such as physical or emotional violence or abuse. However, not all stories tagged as "dark" are considered to be a darkfic.
"Dead Dove Do Not Eat", sometimes abbreviated as DDDNE, is a sub-category of darkfic.[28]It began as anAO3tag in 2015, intended to warn people that the story contained dark themes without explicitly condemning them; because the dark themes were tagged, it served to reinforce readers' attention to them. Since 2015, it has evolved into its own tag, meaning that sometimes other dark themes are not tagged and are assumed to be present in the story.
Fix-it fic
editStories that rewrite canonical events that the author disliked or otherwise wanted to "fix", such as major plot holes or a tragic event or ending; for instance, an alternate universe where "everyone lives". Fix-it fics that focus on correcting flaws in the original work are also known as a "rebuild fic", named after theRebuild of Evangelionseries. If it focuses heavily on critical thinking skills and deductive reasoning, it can be considered a "rationalist rewrite", as popularized byHarry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.
Fluff
editStories designed to be light-hearted and romantic.[29]Another term for this genre is WAFF, which is short for "warm and fuzzy feelings."
Hurt/comfort
editStories in which a character is put through a traumatic experience in order to be comforted.[30]The climax of these stories is usually when one character witnesses another character's suffering and alleviates it. Another type of hurt/comfort is whump, which focuses on the character's suffering, sometimes to the exclusion of comfort; excessive whump may also be considered darkfic.[31]
Self-insert
editStories in which a version of the author is transported to the fictional world that the fan fiction is based on, which are oftenwritten in the first person.Self-insert fanfiction is often compared toMary Suecharacters. Some researchers argue that self-insert characters can be found in literature from the 19th century and earlier.[32]There are several types of self-inserts, including: "y/n" (short for [insert] your name ")," xReader, "and" imagines. "[33][34]Several of these subgenres are unique to specific platforms.[34]
Recursive | meta | fan-verse
editStories based on an existing fan work. On Archive of Our Own, this type of recursive fan fiction is called a "remix".[35]
Songfic
editStories which are interspersed with the lyrics of a relevant song.[36][37]The term is a combination of "song" and "fiction"; as such, it is also referred to as "songfiction". Since many song lyrics are undercopyright,whether songfics are a violation of copyright law is a subject of debate. Some fan fiction sites, such as FanFiction.Net, have prevented authors from posting songfics with lyrics from songs that are not in thepublic domain.[38]
In an essay inMusic, Sound, and Silence in Buffy the Vampire Slayer,University of SydneyprofessorCatherine Driscollcommented that the genre was "one of the least distinguished modes of fan production" and that "within fan fiction excessive attachment to or foregrounding of popular music is itself dismissed as immature and derivative".[39]
Uberfic
editUberficis a form of alternative universe in which characters physically resemble and share personality traits with their canon counterparts, but have new names and backgrounds in a different setting. The term originated in theXena: Warrior Princessfandom[40]and was inspired by the episode "The Xena Scrolls", which featured 1940s-era descendants of the characters Xena, Gabrielle, and Joxer, who are played by their respective actors, on an archaeological dig in anIndiana Jonespastiche.As the concept of the uberfic can be adapted into original fiction, many uberfic authors, such as Melissa Good,Radclyffe,andLori L. Lake,have legally published theirXenauberfic as originallesbian literature.
Terminology
editAuthor's note (A/N)
editAlso abbreviated as A/N, author's notes are typically found directly before the beginning or after the end of a fan fiction or its chapters, but can be written at any point in the story and are used to convey direct messages from the author to the reader regarding it.[41]
Beta reader
editAlso known as a beta. Someone whoeditsorproofreadssomeone else's fan fiction.[42]
Canon
editThe original story. This refers to anything related to the original source, including the plot, setting, and characters.[43]
Disclaimer
editDisclaimersare author's notes which typically inform readers about who deserves credit for the original source material,[44]and often containing pseudo-legal language disavowing any intent ofcopyright infringementor alluding tofair use.Such "disclaimers" are legally ineffective and are based on misunderstandings ofcopyright law,particularly confusion between illegal copyright infringement and unethicalplagiarism.[45]Disclaimers have fallen out of use since Archive of Our Own's rise in popularity.
Drabble
editAdrabbleis a piece of writing that is exactly 100 words long,[29]although it is commonly used to refer to any short fan fiction.
Fandom
editAfandomis a group of fans of a work of fiction who dedicate their time and energy to their interest.Fan labor,such as fan fiction, is written by fans as a way to express their creativity and love for the original work.
Fangirl/fanboy
editA person who is an enthusiastic member of one or more fandoms. The term fangirling/fanboying refers to when a person is excited about a fandom.
Fanon
editA portmanteau of fan and canon. It is an "unofficial canon" idea that is widely accepted to be true among fans,[46]but is neither confirmed nor officially endorsed by the original author or source creator, preventing it from being considered canon. Fanon can refer to an interpretation of the original work or details within it.
Head canon (HC)
editA fan's personal interpretation of canon, such as the backstory of a character or the nature of relationships between characters.[46]It can be drawn from subtext present in the canon, but cannot directly contradict it. If other fans share this interpretation, it can become fanon.
Mary Sue
editAMary Sue,also known as MS, is a term which editors and writers credit as originating inStar Trekfan fiction and later becoming part of the mainstream. In early fan fiction, a common plot was a minor member of the USSEnterprise's crew saving the life of Kirk or Spock, often being rewarded with a sexual relationship as a result. The term "Mary Sue", which originated in a parody of stories in thewish fulfillmentgenre, often refers to an idealized or overpowered character who lacks flaws and is often seen as a representation of the author.[47]
One true pairing (OTP)
editAn abbreviation of the term "one true pairing", referring to a person's favorite ship.[46]OT3, OT4, and so on is the term used for apolyamorousOTP.[46]
One shot
editA standalone piece of writing, as opposed to a multichapter work.[48]
Real person fiction (RPF)
editStories about real people, usually celebrities, rather than fictional characters. The bookAfterbyAnna Todd,later adapted into a film ofthe same name,was originally a real person fan fiction aboutOne DirectionmemberHarry Styles.
Shipping
editShippingis a variant ofromancethat focuses on exploring a relationship between two or more characters from the original fandom(s). It has several fandom-specific subgenres, including slash, which focuses on homosexual pairings, andfemslash,which is similar but instead focuses on lesbian pairings. The term "shipping" can also refer to a fan who is heavily invested in a relationship between two characters. Writers of fan fiction often use the genre to explore homosexual pairings for popular characters who are not in, or not specified to be in, homosexual relationships in canon.[49]A subcategory of shipping, "curtainfic", which depicts romantic couples in mundane domestic situations such as picking out curtains, was once used but has somewhat fallen out of use.
Smut
editAlso known as porn orerotica.Sexually explicit or pornographic fan fiction, which can be a part of a story or the entire story. Historically, the terms "lemon", or explicit pornography, and "lime", sexually suggestive works, were euphemisms used to refer to explicit material.[48]These terms were once common in the 2000s, but fell out of use before becoming popular again in December 2018 due to thecensorshipof adult content onTumblr,as it allowed writers to circumvent "explicit terminologies" that could get their work flagged by platforms like Tumblr while still being able to tag their work as explicit.
Trigger warning (TW)
editTrigger warningsare used to warn people of content in fan fiction that could be harmful or "triggering" for those who have dealt with traumatic situations, allowing them to prepare for or avoid certain content. Sometimes, content warning (CW) is used, either instead of or in addition to a trigger warning.
Trigger warnings are usually used when the subject matter of a work deals with issues such as drug abuse, mental illness, abuse, or extreme violence. Archive of Our Own has codified a system of common warnings into its coretags,[50]requiring authors to either disclose or explicitly choose not to disclose if their work contains graphic violence, major character death, rape, or underage sex.
Interactivity in the online era
editReviews can be posted by both anonymous and registered users on most sites, which are often programmed to notify the author of new feedback. This makes them a common way for readers and authors to communicate online, as well as to help authors improve their writing throughconstructive criticism.[51][unreliable source?]Occasionally, unmoderated review systems are abused forflaming,spam,ortrolling;to prevent this, an author can either disable or enable anonymous reviews, depending on their preference. Fan fiction has also been shown to improve literacy by allowing authors to have a wider audience for their works and encouraging people to write.[52]
Other ways that members of a fandom can participate in their community include gift exchanges and fic exchanges. A gift exchange is an organized challenge in which participants create fan fiction for other participants. They may research what the user receiving their gift enjoys or submissions may include a "letter" explaining what the recipient wants or does not want.[53]
Legality
editThere is ongoing debate about to what extent fan fiction is permitted under contemporarycopyright law.
Some argue that fan fiction does not fall underfair use,as it isderivative work.[54][55]The 2009 ruling byUnited States District CourtJudge Deborah A. Batts, permanently prohibiting publication in the United States of a book by Ryan Cassidy, a Swedish writer whose protagonist is a 76-year-old version ofHolden CaulfieldofThe Catcher in the Rye,may be seen as upholding this position regarding publishing fan fiction, as the judge stated, "To the extent Defendants contend that 60 Years and the character of Mr. C direct parodied comment or criticism atCatcheror Holden Caulfield, as opposed to Salinger himself, the Court finds such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naivety of the original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody. "[56]
Others such as theOrganization for Transformative Worksuphold the legality of non-profit fan fiction under the fair use doctrine, as it is a creative,transformativeprocess.[57]
In 1981,LucasfilmLtd. sent out a letter to severalfanzinepublishers, asserting Lucasfilm's copyright to allStar Warscharactersand insisting that no fanzine publishpornography.The letter also alluded to possible legal action that could be taken against fanzines that did not comply.[58]
The Harry Potter Lexicon is one case where the encyclopedia-like website about everything in the Harry Potter series moved towards publishing and commercializing the Lexicon as a supplementary and complementary source of information to the series. Rowling and her publishers levied a lawsuit against the website creator, Steven Vander Ark, and the publishing company, RDR Books, for a breach of copyright. While the lawsuit did conclude in Vander Ark's favor, the main issue in contention was the majority of the Lexicon copied a majority of the Series' material and does not transform enough of the material to be held separately from the series itself.[59]
While the HP Lexicon case is an example of Western culture treatment of fan fiction and copyright law, in China, Harry Potter fan fiction is less addressed in legal conflicts but is used as a cultural and educational tool between Western and Chinese cultures. More specifically, while there are a number of "fake" Harry Potter books in China, most of these books are said to be addressing concepts and issues found in Chinese culture. This transformative usage of Harry Potter in fan fiction is allegedly from the desire to enhance and express value to Chinese tradition and culture.[60]
Some prominent authors have given their blessings to fan fiction, notablyJ.K. Rowling.By 2014, there were already almost 750,000 Harry Potter fan stories on the web, ranging from short stories to novel-length tomes.[61]Rowling said she was "flattered" that people wanted to write their own stories based on her fictional characters.[62]Similarly,Stephenie Meyerhas put links on her website to fan fiction sites about her characters from theTwilightseries.[63]TheFifty Shadestrilogywas developed from aTwilightfan fiction originally titledMaster of the Universeand published episodically on fan-fiction websites under the pen name "Snowqueen's Icedragon". The piece featured characters named after Stephenie Meyer's characters inTwilight,Edward CullenandBella Swan.[64][65]
However, in 2003, a British law firm representing J.K. Rowling and Warner Bros. sent a letter to webmasters requesting that adult Harry Potter fan fiction ( "stories containing graphically violent and sexual content" ) be removed from a prominent fan fiction website, citing concerns that children might stumble upon the illicit content. In response, the webmasters from several websites hosting adult Harry Potter fan fiction, among other types of fan fiction, "made claims of 'fair use' and nonprofessional status" to justify their right to continue hosting the adult content.[66]
As an example of changing views on the subject, authorOrson Scott Card(best known for theEnder's Gameseries) once stated on his website, "to write fiction using my characters is morally identical to moving into my house without invitation and throwing out my family." He changed his mind completely and since has assisted fan fiction contests, arguing to theWall Street Journalthat "Every piece of fan fiction is an ad for my book. What kind of idiot would I be to want that to disappear?"[67]
However,Anne Riceconsistently and aggressively prevented fan fiction based on any of her fictional characters (mostly those from her famousInterview with the Vampireand its sequels inThe Vampire Chronicles). She, along withAnne McCaffrey(whose stance has been changed by her son, Todd McCaffrey, since her death) andRaymond Feist,asked to have any fiction related to their series removed from FanFiction.Net.[62]George R.R. Martinis also strongly opposed to fan fiction, believing it to be copyright infringement and a bad exercise for aspiring writers.[68][69]Sharon LeeandSteve Miller,creators of theLiaden universe,strongly oppose fan fiction written in their universe, with Lee saying that "Nobody else is going to get it right. This may sound rude and elitist, but honestly, it's not easy for us to get it right sometimes, and we've been living with these characters... for a very long time."[70]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^"Fanfiction: A Legal Battle of Creativity".Reporter Magazine.February 5, 2016.Archivedfrom the original on February 3, 2018.RetrievedMarch 19,2018.
- ^Schulz, Nancy (December 31, 2001)."Fan Fiction—TV Viewers Have It Their Way".Encyclopædia Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on August 6, 2020.RetrievedNovember 23,2018.
- ^"fan fiction n."Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction.Archivedfrom the original on January 2, 2024.RetrievedJanuary 2,2024.
- ^abJeff Prucher, ed. (2007)."fan fiction".Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction.New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. p. 57.ISBN978-0-19-530567-8.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedAugust 15,2019.
- ^John Bristol (1944).Fancyclopedia.The Fantasy Foundation.Archivedfrom the original on January 24, 2016.RetrievedApril 22,2015.
- ^"William Shakespeare – Shakespeare's sources".Encyclopædia Britannica.September 7, 2023.Archivedfrom the original on May 3, 2015.RetrievedMarch 4,2019.
- ^Fleming, Colin (April 19, 2017)."The Icelandic Dracula: Bram Stoker's vampire takes a second bite".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on September 6, 2019.RetrievedOctober 26,2020.
- ^"The early adventures of the apocryphal Sherlock Holmes".The Daily Dot.January 16, 2014.Archivedfrom the original on October 30, 2020.RetrievedOctober 26,2020.
- ^"In long-lost play, the author of 'Peter Pan' spoofs 'Sherlock Holmes' and the mystery genre".PBS NewsHour.August 10, 2017.Archivedfrom the original on October 30, 2020.RetrievedOctober 26,2020.
- ^Anderson, Hephzibah."The book that changed Jane Eyre forever".BBC.Archivedfrom the original on November 11, 2020.RetrievedOctober 26,2020.
- ^Verba, Joan Marie (2003).Boldly Writing: A Trekker Fan & Zine History, 1967–1987(PDF).Minnetonka MN: FTL Publications.ISBN0-9653575-4-6.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 10, 2016.RetrievedApril 3,2017.
- ^Coppa, Francesca(2006). "A Brief History of Media Fandom". In Hellekson, Karen; Busse, Kristina (eds.).Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet.Jefferson, North Carolina:McFarland & Company.pp. 41–59.ISBN978-0-7864-2640-9.
- ^Bacon-Smith, Camille (2000).Science Fiction Culture.University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 112–113.ISBN978-0-8122-1530-4.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedOctober 24,2020.
- ^Boog, Jason (September 18, 2008)."Brokeback 33 Percent".Mediabistro.Archived fromthe originalon February 10, 2013.RetrievedJanuary 22,2012.
- ^Buechner, Maryanne Murray (March 4, 2002)."Pop Fiction".Time.Archived fromthe originalon February 18, 2007.RetrievedMay 29,2010.
- ^Bradley, Karen (Winter 2005). "Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development".New Directions for Youth Development.2005(108): 57–76.doi:10.1002/yd.142.PMID16570878.
- ^Marah Eakin (February 12, 2015)."Holy crow! Fifty Shades Of Grey is crazy similar to its Twilight origin story".The A.V. Club.Archivedfrom the original on August 18, 2017.RetrievedApril 17,2020.
- ^Brennan, Joseph; Large, David (2014). "'Let's get a bit of context': Fifty Shades and the phenomenon of 'pulling to publish' in Twilight fan fiction ".Media International Australia.152(1): 27–39.doi:10.1177/1329878X1415200105.S2CID140471681.
- ^"'After' Movie: Paramount Acquires Rights To Wattpad Book By Anna Todd ".Deadline Hollywood.October 16, 2014.Archivedfrom the original on October 7, 2018.RetrievedDecember 26,2014.
- ^Ford, Rebecca (June 4, 2015)."'Mom' Writer Susan McMartin to Adapt One Direction-Inspired Fan-Fiction 'After' (Exclusive) ".The Hollywood Reporter.Archivedfrom the original on August 29, 2015.RetrievedSeptember 2,2015.
- ^Pepitone, Julianne (May 3, 2013)."Amazon's" Kindle Worlds "lets fan fiction writers sell their stories".CNN Money.Archivedfrom the original on June 15, 2013.RetrievedMay 23,2013.
- ^"Amazon to Shut Down Kindle Worlds – The Digital Reader".May 15, 2018.Archivedfrom the original on August 20, 2020.RetrievedAugust 26,2020.
- ^Kelvin, Lord (March 18, 2011)."Fan Fiction Demographics in 2010".FFN Research.Blogger.Archivedfrom the original on January 10, 2023.RetrievedFebruary 20,2020.
- ^abcdDuggan, Jennifer (September 1, 2020)."Who writes Harry Potter fan fiction? Passionate detachment, 'zooming out,' and fan fiction paratexts on AO3".Transformative Works and Cultures.34.doi:10.3983/twc.2020.1863.S2CID224983629.Archivedfrom the original on June 28, 2023.RetrievedJuly 10,2021.
- ^"FanWorks.org:: Fan Works Inc. – Help & Tools Index".www.fanworks.org.Archivedfrom the original on January 30, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 30,2019.
- ^Samutina, Natalia (July 3, 2016)."Fan fiction as world-building: transformative reception in crossover writing".Continuum.30(4): 433–450.doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1141863.ISSN1030-4312.S2CID147685039.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedJuly 11,2021.
- ^"Darkfic – Fanlore".fanlore.org.Archivedfrom the original on February 12, 2019.RetrievedFebruary 11,2019.
- ^"Dead Dove: Do Not Eat - Fanlore".fanlore.org.RetrievedJuly 15,2024.
- ^abMaggs, Sam (2015).The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks.Quirk Books.p. 83.ISBN9781594747892.
- ^"Fan Fiction Dictionary -- Your Guide To Fanspeak".expressions.populli.net.Archivedfrom the original on April 28, 2016.RetrievedMay 12,2016.
- ^Linn, Rachel Elizabeth (September 15, 2017)."Bodies in horrifying hurt/comfort fan fiction: Paying the toll".Transformative Works and Cultures.25.doi:10.3983/twc.2017.01102.ISSN1941-2258.Archivedfrom the original on July 11, 2021.RetrievedJuly 11,2021.
- ^""Too Good to Be True": 150 Years of Mary Sue, by Pat Pflieger ".www.merrycoz.org.RetrievedJuly 15,2024.
- ^"Mary Sue".Fansplaining.March 23, 2017.RetrievedJuly 15,2024.
- ^abSapuridis, Effie; Alberto, Maria K. (June 2022)."Self-Insert Fanfiction as Digital Technology of the Self".Humanities.11(3): 68.doi:10.3390/h11030068.ISSN2076-0787.
- ^"Posting and Editing FAQ | Archive of Our Own".archiveofourown.org.Archivedfrom the original on June 13, 2021.RetrievedJuly 10,2021.
- ^Heilman, Elizabeth E. (September 1, 2008).Critical Perspectives on Harry Potter.Routledge. pp. 320–321.ISBN9781135891541.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedOctober 24,2020.
- ^Lugmayr, Artur; Zotto, Cinzia Dal (July 23, 2016).Media Convergence Handbook – Vol. 2: Firms and User Perspectives.Springer. p. 148.ISBN9783642544873.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedOctober 24,2020.
- ^"Guidelines".FanFiction.net.Archivedfrom the original on March 11, 2016.RetrievedMay 27,2016.
- ^Attinello, Paul Gregory; Halfyard, Janet K.; Knights, Vanessa (January 1, 2010).Music, Sound and Silence in Buffy the Vampire Slayer.Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 114, 129.ISBN9780754660415.Archivedfrom the original on February 22, 2024.RetrievedOctober 24,2020.
- ^"Whoosh!".www.whoosh.org.Archivedfrom the original on May 1, 2008.RetrievedMay 8,2021.
- ^Herzog, Alexandra Elisabeth (September 15, 2012).""But this is my story and this is how I wanted to write it": Author's notes as a fannish claim to power in fan fiction writing ".Transformative Works and Cultures.11.doi:10.3983/twc.2012.0406.Archivedfrom the original on October 8, 2023.RetrievedDecember 30,2023.
- ^Kelley, Brittany (June 2016). "Chocolate Frogs for My Betas!: Practicing Literacy at One Online Fanfiction Website".Computers and Composition.40:48–59.doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.001.
- ^Maggs, Sam (2015).The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks.Quirk Books.p. 28.ISBN9781594747892.
- ^Freeman, Morgan."A Fanspeak Dictionary".Archivedfrom the original on April 28, 2016.RetrievedApril 20,2017.
- ^"Fan Fiction, Plagiarism, and Copyright".March 18, 2012. Archived fromthe originalon November 18, 2017.RetrievedJuly 27,2017.
- ^abcdRomano, Aja (June 7, 2016)."Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fandom".Vox.Archivedfrom the original on March 20, 2021.RetrievedDecember 26,2023.
- ^Segall (2008).Fan Fiction Writing: New Work Based on Favorite Fiction.Rosen Pub. p.26.ISBN978-1404213562.
- ^abMaggs, Sam (2015).The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy: a handbook for Girl Geeks.Quirk Books.p. 84.ISBN9781594747892.
- ^Hayes, Sharon; Ball, Matthew (2010), Scherer, B. (ed.),"Queering cyberspace: fan fiction communities as spaces for expressing and exploring sexuality",Queering Paradigms,Switzerland: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 219–240,ISBN978-3-03911-970-7,archivedfrom the original on August 31, 2022,retrievedOctober 21,2020
- ^"Tags FAQ | Archive of Our Own".archiveofourown.org.Archivedfrom the original on July 14, 2021.RetrievedJuly 10,2021.
- ^Merlin, Missy (September 13, 2007)."Dr. Merlin's Guide to Fanfiction".Firefox.Archived fromthe originalon May 23, 2008.RetrievedMay 7,2008.
- ^Tosenberger, Catherine (2008) "Homosexuality at the Online Hogwarts: Harry Potter Slash Fanfiction"Children's Literature36 pp. 185-207doi:10.1353/chl.0.0017
- ^Romano, Aja (October 1, 2012)."Yuletide, the Internet's biggest" Secret Santa "fanfiction exchange, turns 10".The Daily Dot.Archivedfrom the original on July 9, 2023.RetrievedJanuary 9,2024.
- ^Lee, A.T. (October 1998)."What's" Derivative Work? "".A Brief Introduction to Copyright for Fanfiction Authors.Woosh!.Archivedfrom the original on May 9, 2008.RetrievedApril 24,2008.
- ^"Library Journal".www.schoollibraryjournal.com.Archived fromthe originalon August 5, 2009.
- ^Chan, Sewell(July 1, 2009)."Ruling for Salinger, Judge Bans 'Rye' Sequel".Cityroom.The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on September 21, 2011.RetrievedOctober 5,2011.
- ^"Frequently Asked Questions – Legal".Organization for Transformative Works.Archived fromthe originalon October 1, 2009.RetrievedSeptember 5,2009.
- ^Jenkins, Henry (2003)."Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars?: Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture".Archived fromthe originalon March 9, 2009.
- ^Schwabach, Aaron (2009). "The Harry Potter Lexicon and the World of Fandom: Fan Fiction, Outsider Works and, Copyright".University of Pittsburgh Law Review.70(3): 387–434.
- ^Gupta, Suman (2009).Re-Reading Harry Potter 2nd Ed.Basingstoke (UK); New York (US): Palgrave Macmillan.
- ^p.36 of Don Tresca. 2014. "Spellbound: An Analysis of Adult-OrientedHarry PotterFanfiction ", pp. 36-46 in Kristin M. Barton and Jonathan Malcolm Lampley (eds.).Fan CULTure: Essays on Participatory Fandom in the 21st Century.London: McFarland & Company.
- ^abWaters, Darren (May 27, 2004)."Rowling backs Potter fan fiction".BBC.Archivedfrom the original on February 26, 2008.RetrievedApril 24,2008.
- ^"Twilight Series Fansites".StephenieMeyer.com. Archived fromthe originalon October 6, 2011.RetrievedOctober 5,2011.
- ^GalleyCat."The Lost History ofFifty Shades of Grey".mediabistro.com.Archived fromthe originalon July 27, 2014.RetrievedJune 30,2015.
- ^"Fifty Shades of Grey:Stephenie Meyer Speaks Out ".mtv.com.MTV. Archived fromthe originalon October 5, 2012.RetrievedSeptember 6,2012.
- ^pp.36-37 of Tresca (2014)
- ^Romano, Aja (May 7, 2013)."Orson Scott Card's long history of homophobia".Salon.com.Archivedfrom the original on November 6, 2013.RetrievedNovember 5,2013.
- ^"Frequently Asked Questions – George R. R. Martin's Official Website".Georgerrmartin.com. Archived fromthe originalon April 14, 2012.RetrievedOctober 5,2011.
- ^Martin, George R.R. (May 7, 2010)."Someone Is Angry On the Internet".Archived fromthe originalon June 13, 2013.RetrievedMarch 24,2013.
- ^Sharon Lee, Writer (October 26, 2013)."Lee, Sharon." The second answer "Sharon Lee, WriterOctober 26, 2013 ".Sharonleewriter.com.Archivedfrom the original on February 5, 2019.RetrievedNovember 5,2013.
Further reading
edit- Black, R. (2008).Adolescents and Online Fan Fiction.New York: Peter Lang.
- Coppa, Francesca(2017).The Fanfiction Reader: Folk Tales for the Digital Age.University of Michigan Press.
- Dow, Nardeen (March 2020)."Homosocial or homoerotic: A re-reading of gender and sexuality in Harry Potter through fanfiction".Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture.5(1): 27–47.doi:10.1386/qsmpc_00023_1.
- Jamison, Anne(2013).Fic: Why Fan Fiction is Taking Over the World.Dallas, Tx: Smart Pop.ISBN978-1-939529-19-0.
- Jenkins, Henry(1992).Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture.New York: Routledge.ISBN0-415-90571-0.
- Larsen, Katherine & Zubernis, Lynn eds. (2012).Fan Culture: Theory / Practice.Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Lawrence, K. F. (2007).The Web of Community Trust - Amateur Fiction Online: A Case Study in Community-Focused Design for the Semantic Web.Ph.D. thesis,University of Southampton.Retrieved August 20, 2008.
- Orr, David(October 3, 2004)."Where to Find Digital Lit".The New York Times.
- Pugh, Sheenagh(2005).The Democratic Genre: Fan Fiction in a Literary Context.Bridgend, Wales: Seren.ISBN1-85411-399-2.
- Grossman, Lev(July 7, 2011)."The Boy Who Lived Forever".Time.
- Hellekson, Karen&Busse, Kristina,eds. (2014).The Fan Fiction Studies Reader.Iowa City: The University of Iowa Press.
- ————— ( 2006).Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays.Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Co.,ISBN0-7864-2640-3.
- Lipton, Shana Ting (February 13, 2015)."How Fifty Shades Is Dominating the Literary Scene".Vanity Fair.
External links
edit- Media related toFan fictionat Wikimedia Commons
- "Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars?: Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture"—Henry Jenkins on fan fiction