This articleneeds additional citations forverification.(September 2008) |
TheMk 4 Folding-Fin Aerial Rocket(FFAR), also known as "Mighty Mouse",is an unguidedrocketused by United Statesmilitary aircraft.It was 2.75 inches (70 mm) in diameter. Designed as anair-to-air weaponforinterceptor aircraftto shoot down enemybombers,it primarily saw service as an air-to-surface weapon. The FFAR has been developed into the modernHydra 70series, which is still in service.
Folding-Fin Aerial Rocket / Mighty Mouse | |
---|---|
Type | Air-to-air rocket,air-to-surface rocket |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
Used by | United States military |
Specifications | |
Diameter | 2.75 inches (70 mm) |
Warhead | various |
Engine | Solid-fuel rocket |
Guidance system | None |
History
editThe advent ofjet enginesfor fighters and bombers posed new problems for interceptors. With closing speeds of 1,500 ft/s (457 m/s) or more for head-on interceptions, the time available for a fighter pilot to successfully target an enemy aircraft and inflict sufficient damage to bring it down was increasingly small.Wartimeexperience had shown that.50 caliber (12.7 mm) machine guns were not powerful enough to reliably down a bomber, certainly not in a single volley, and heavyautocannonsdid not have the range or rate of fire to ensure a hit. Unguided rockets had been proven effective in ground-attack work during the war, and theLuftwaffehad shown that volleys of theirWerfer-Granate 21rockets, first used by elements of theLuftwaffe'sJG 1andJG 11fighter wings on July 29, 1943, against USAAF bombers attackingKielandWarnemünde,could be a potent air-to-air weapon. The summer and autumn of 1944 saw the adoption of the folding-finR4Munguided rocket for use underneath the wings of theMesserschmitt Me 262jet fighter forbomber destroyerduties against theUSAAF's Eighth Air Force heavy bombers.
The FFAR was developed in the late 1940s by theUS Navy'sNaval Ordnance Test CenterandNorth American Aviation.[citation needed]Mass production was established at the facilities of theNorris-Thermador Corp.,Los Angeles, and the Hunter Douglas Division of theBridgeport Brass Co.,Riverside, California[1]Fuzeswere manufactured by theBulova Watch Co.,Jackson Heights, Queens, N.Y.,[2]withrocket propellantsupplied byHercules Inc.,Wilmington, Delaware,[3]metal parts supplied byAerojet General,Downey, California,[4]and miscellaneous spare parts were made byNorth American Aviation.[5]
The original Mk 4 FFAR was about 4 ft (1.2 m) long and weighed 18.5 lb (8.4 kg), with a high-explosivewarheadof about 6 lb (2.7 kg). Like theLuftwaffe'sR4M projectile of World War II, it had folding fins that flipped out on launch to spin-stabilize the rocket, with the FFAR using half the number (four) of fins in comparison to the R4M's set of eight. Its maximum effective range was about 3,700 yards (3,400 m). Because of its low intrinsic accuracy, it was generally fired in large volleys, with some aircraft carrying as many as 104 rockets.
FFARs were the primary armament of manyNATOinterceptor aircraftin the early 1950s, including theF-86D,F-89,F-94C,and theCF-100.They were also carried by theF-102 Delta Daggerto supplement its guided missile armament.
The Mk 4 was dubbed "Mighty Mouse" in service, after the popularcartoon character.
The Mighty Mouse was to prove a poor aerial weapon. Although it was powerful enough to destroy a bomber with a single hit, its accuracy was abysmal. The rockets dispersed widely on launch: a volley of 24 rockets would cover an area the size of afootball field.A particularly clear demonstration of this poor accuracy occurred on August 16, 1956, when a pair of U.S. Air Force F-89s wereunable to shoot downa runaway U.S. Navy drone aircraft despite expending 208 rockets in the attempt.[6]
As a result, by the late 1950s it had been largely abandoned as an aircraft weapon in favor of the guidedair-to-air missilesthen becoming available. The Mk 4 found other uses, however, as an air-to-ground weapon, particularly for the new breed ofarmed helicopter.A volley of FFARs was as devastating as a heavycannonwith far less weight andrecoil,and in the ground-attack role its marginal long-range accuracy was less important. It was fitted with a more powerful motor to become theMk 40.The Mk 40 was a universal motor developed from the Mk 4 2.75 FFAR, and could be fitted with different warheads depending on the mission. Pods (typically carrying seven or 19 rockets) were created for various applications, and a wide variety of specialized warheads were developed for antipersonnel,antitank,and target-marking use.
US Mk 40 FFAR launchers
editThe United States was the primary user of this type of weapon and developed a number of different launching pods for it. LAU-3 pods were constructed of aluminum-reinforced cardboard and were intended to be disposed of either on the ground after a mission or by dropping them in-flight. With the advent of the armed helicopter, and the increased usage during the Vietnam War, the need for launching pods that were reusable became apparent, so that later models were of all-metal construction. Though the rocket was initially developed by the US Navy, the US Air Force and later US Army were most responsible for the development of rocket pods for all services. These pods are described as follows:
US Air Force launchers
edit- Launchers designated under the US Air Force system:
Designation | Description |
---|---|
LAU-3/A | 19-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
LAU-3A/A | LAU-3/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-3B/A | LAU-3A/A variant; differences unknown; US Army XM159 |
LAU-3C/A | LAU-3B/A variant; supports single or ripple fire |
LAU-3D/A | LAU-3C/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-32/A | 7-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
LAU-32A/A | LAU-32/A variant; differences unknown; US Army XM157A |
LAU-32B/A | LAU-32A/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-49/A | 7-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
LAU-51/A | 19-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
LAU-59/A | 7-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
LAU-60/A | 19-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher; similar to LAU-3/A series except in the position of the grounding safety device |
LAU-61/A | 19-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher; US Army M159A1 |
LAU-61A/A | LAU-61/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-61B/A | LAU-61A/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-68/A | 7-Tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher; US Army M158A1 |
LAU-68A/A | LAU-68/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-68B/A | LAU-68A/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-68C/A | LAU-68/A variant; differences unknown |
LAU-69/A | 19-tube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher; US Army M200A1 |
US Army launchers
edit- Launchers designated under the US Army system:
Designation | Description |
---|---|
XM141 | Launcher, 2.75-inch rocket, seven-tube, reloadable, reusable;7-tube 70 mm (2.75” ) rocket launcher |
XM157A | 7-tube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher; not compatible with Mk 66 rocket motor; USAF LAU-32A/A |
XM157B | XM157A variant; longer launch tubes, capable of further mounting an XM118 dispenser |
XM158/M158 | Launcher, 2.75-inch rocket, seven-tube, reloadable, reusable, repairable;7-tube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher |
M158A1 | M158 variant; modified hardback mount; USAF LAU-68/A |
XM159 | Launcher, 2.75-inch FFAR, 19-tube, reloadable, reusable, not repairable;19-ube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher; USAF LAU-3B/A |
XM159B/C | XM159 variants; differences unknown |
M159 | 19-tube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher; type standardization of what XM159 unknown |
M159A1 | M159 variant; differences unknown; USAF LAU-61/A |
XM200/M200 | 19-tube 70 mm (2.75 ") rocket launcher |
M200A1 | M200 variant; differences unknown; USAF LAU-69/A |
MA-2A | 2-tube rocket launcher |
EarlyUH-1B/UH-1Cgunships had the XM-3 subsystem using paired 24 round rectangular launchers mounted near the back edge of the sliding side doors. These pods were ground reloadable and were semi-permanent aircraft parts. The mounting point had been used to mount booms for threeSS-11launchers on each side for anti-tank missions. The co-pilot had a roof mounted sight and control box to fire these. Later UH-1C and D aircraft had a mount on each side to carry a seven-round pod coupled with pairedM-60D machine guns.Some carriedM-134 minigunswith 3,000 rounds per gun instead, though these aircraft were normally used byair cavalryunits, not theaerial rocket artillery(ARA) units.
Also various ground launchers using discarded aircraft pods were used forfire basedefence. A towed configuration consisting of six 19-round pods called a Slammer was tested for airborne infantry support. The range was approximately 7,000 meters using Hydra 70 family rockets.
Warheads for the Mk 40 motor
editWith the development of the Mk 40 Mod 0 universal motor came the development of a considerable number of different warheads, as well as a number of different fuzing options. A list of those warheads believed to be developed before the replacement of the Mk 40 motor with theMk 66motor is as follows:
Fuzing options
editNo. | Designation | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | M423 | Point detonating |
2 | XM438/M438 | Point detonating |
3 | Mk 352 Mod 0/1/2 | Point detonating |
4 | M429 | Proximity airburst |
5 | M442 | Airburst, motor-burnout delay |
6 | Model 113A | Airburst, motor-burnout delay |
US military warheads
editDesignation | Description | Fuzing options |
---|---|---|
M151 | High explosive (HE) | 1,3,4,5 |
M152 | HE w/ red smoke marker | 1,3,4,5 |
M153 | HE w/ yellow smoke marker | 1,3,4,5 |
M156 | White phosphorus (WP) | 1,3,4,5 |
XM157 | Red smoke; compound known as a chemical reaction | 1,3,4,5 |
XM158 | Yellow smoke; unknown compound | 1,3,4,5 |
M247 | High-explosive anti-tank (HEAT)/high-explosive dual purpose (HEDP) | 2 (integral to warhead) |
M257 | Parachute illumination | 5 (integral to warhead) |
Mk 67 Mod 0 | WP | 1,3,4,5 |
Mk 67 Mod 1 | Red phosphorus (RP) | 1,3,4,5 |
WDU-4/A | Anti-personnelwarhead containing 2200 20-grain (1.3 g) flechettes[7] | 11 (integral to warhead) |
MKE FFAR
editTurkish companyMechanical and Chemical Industry Corporationproduce FFAR under licence. The 70 mm unguided rocket consists of MK40 or MK4 rocket motor, warhead and M423 fuze. The rocket is both air to ground and surface to surface capable.[8][9]
- Specifications:
- Total weight: 9.3 kg (with M151 warhead)
- Overall length: 1.4 m (with M151 warhead)
- Warhead type: HE M151, TP MK 61 MOD 0, smoke/signaling MKE MOD 248
- Warhead weight: 3.95 kg (M151)
- Propellant type: double base N5
- Range: 7 km (surface to surface)
- Operation temperature: -54°C to +65°C
See also
editReferences
edit- ^Missiles 1958//Flight and Aircraft Engineer,5 December 1958, v. 74, no. 2602, p. 898.
- ^Defense Procurement.// Defense Industry Bulletin, May 1966, p. 25.
- ^Defense Procurement//Defense Industry Bulletin,November 1966, p. 43.
- ^Defense Procurement.//Defense Industry Bulletin,August 1967, p. 32.
- ^Contracts.//Missiles and Rockets,May 18, 1959, v. 5, no. 20, p. 60.
- ^Baraniuk, Chris (15 August 2016)."The runaway drone that caused a Cold War air battle".BBC.com.Retrieved6 September2020.
- ^Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles
- ^"2,75" folding fin aerial rocket (FFAR) ".www.mkek.gov.tr.Retrieved27 July2021.
- ^"2.75 Inch Folding-Fin Aerial Roket FFAR".TURKISH DEFENCE INDUSTRY PRODUCT CATALOGUE. Archived fromthe originalon 26 July 2021.Retrieved27 July2021.
External links
edit- Fighter Fires Rocket Missiles Like Machine Gun Bullets1951 article about recently introduced 2.75 inch Mighty Mouse rocket