Foreign Military Sales(FMS) is a security assistance program of theUnited Statesgovernment to facilitate the purchase of U.S. arms, defense equipment, design and construction services, andmilitary trainingto foreign governments.[1]FMS is a government-to-government program where theUnited States Department of Defensethrough theDefense Security Cooperation Agency(DSCA) acquires defense articles on behalf of the foreign governments, protecting them from contract risks in negotiating with thearms industryand providing the contract benefits and protections that apply toU.S. militaryacquisitions.[2][3]The FMS program was established through the 1976Arms Export Control Act(AECA) and is overseen by theUnited States Department of Stateand theUnited States Congressthrough the annual Foreign Operations Appropriations Acts andNational Defense Authorization Acts.[2][4]
TheDSCAdescribes FMS as "a fundamental tool of U.S. foreign policy."[5]FMS was the primary channel for U.S. arms exports until the 1980s, when the limits on the size of permitted Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) was lifted.[6]DCS was seen by buyers to be faster, more cost-effective and less-transparent than FMS. By 1989, DCS surpassed FMS in value. However, theGulf Warreversed the decline in FMS and by FY 1992–93, DCS had dropped to one-fifth of U.S. arms sales.[6]
In FY 2020, U.S. military-industry base sold $50.8 billion through FMS and $124.3 billion through Direct Commercial Sales.[7][2]In 2023, the U.S. recorded the highest annual sales of U.S. military equipment to foreign governments, carried out under the FMS system, valued at $80.9 billion. This marked a 55.9% increase compared to the $51.9 billion recorded in 2022.[8]FMS is carried out with countries that are authorized to participate and is subject to approval based on the mechanism to procure services, a deposit in a U.S. trust fund or appropriate credit, and approval to fund services. On any given day, DSCA is managing “14,000 open foreign military sales cases with 185 countries,” the DSCA director Lieutenant General Charles Hooper explained at the Brookings Institution in June 2019.[1]
Foreign Military Sales Process
editThe State Department, through itsBureau of Political-Military Affairs(PM), is responsible for the administration of FMS while the Defense Department through the DSCA is responsible for its implementation. DSCA coordinates with PM to review and consult with Congress to receive formal agreement with an eligible foreign government.[4]
Letter of Request (LOR)
editForeign governments submit a Letter of Request (LOR) to a U.S. government Security Cooperation Organization (SCO), typically the Office of Defense Cooperation within the U.S. embassy in that country or directly to the DSCA or to a U.S. military department (Department of the Army,Department of the NavyorDepartment of the Air Force) or another Defense Department agency.[4]There are three types of LORs: LOR for Price and Availability (P&A) for the foreign government to obtain basic information for further planning; LOR for a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA), an official expression of interest by a foreign country; and LOR for a change to an already existing LOA for making amendments to existing LORs.[9]
FMS Case Identifiers
editAn FMS case identifier that consists of a country, the code of an implementing agency (Army, Navy or Air Force) and a unique three-position FMS case designator is assigned to each LOR.[10][11]For example,U.S. Air Force(USAF) FMS programs are assigned two-wordcode namesbeginning with the word PEACE, indicating oversight by USAF headquarters.[12][9]
Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA)
editThe FMS case is reviewed by the implementing agency and DSCA to ensure compliance with the requirements of the LOR and U.S. laws and regulations. If approved by the implementing agency and the DSCA, the Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) is submitted to the State Department for its review and approval. The LOA is also transmitted to the foreign government for its review and approval.[9]
Pricing
editFMS sales are required to be cost-neutral to the U.S. government. To cover the costs incurred by the government to process an FMS, administrative surcharges, Contract Administration Services (CAS), Non-recurring costs (NC) and other fees are included in the payment schedule described in the LOA.[9]
Payment
editThe LOA includes an estimated payment schedule for the foreign government that typically consists of an initial deposit and future quarterly payments. Methods of payment typically consist ofForeign Military Financing,the foreign government's funds or an existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) orMemorandum of Understanding(MOU) with the United States. Payments are made to theDefense Finance and Accounting Service(DFAS) in theUnited States dollarthrough check or wire transfer.[9]
Delivery
editAfter the acceptance of the LOA by the foreign government, the implementing agency is authorised by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to obligate funds to execute the FMS and begin the procurement of the defense articles and/or services. Major FMS cases can include the procurement of items from existing U.S. government stocks and new production. Procurement for a foreign government is typically managed by the same office responsible for the procurement of an article for the U.S. government.[9]
According to Defense Department policy, the purchaser is responsible for the transportation and delivery of purchased articles. Purchasers can either use the Defense Transportation System (DTS) on a reimbursable basis or use their own freight forwarder to manage the transportation and delivery.[13][9]
Congressional Notification Requirements
editSection 36(b) (22 U.S.C. §2776(b)) of the AECA specifies that Congress must be notified about arms sales 30 days before the issuance of a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) for defense equipment valued at $14 million of more, defense articles or services valued at $50 million or more, or design and construction services valued at $200 million or more. Congress must also be notified 15 days before the issuance of an LOA toNATO members,Japan,Australia,South Korea,IsraelorNew Zealandfor the sale, enhancement, or upgrading of major defense equipment valued at $25 million or more, defense articles or services at $100 million or more, or design and construction services of $300 million or more.[14]Congress has the authority to block a sale.[4]
Waivers
editOn 24 May 2019,Secretary of stateMike Pompeoinvoked AECA Section 36 emergency provisions to complete "22 pending arms transfers" worth $8.1 billion toJordan,Saudi Arabiaand theUnited Arab Emirates(UAE) to "deterIranianaggression ".[15][16][17][18]On 24 July, PresidentDonald Trumpvetoed the S.J.Res. 36 (prohibiting co-production ofPavewaybombs), S.J.Res. 37 (prohibiting transfer of maintenance services for theAGM-65 Maverickmissile and Paveway systems) and S.J.Res. 38 (prohibiting transfer of technical data to support the manufacturing of the Aurora Fuzing System for thePaveway IVbomb).[19][20]On July 29, a Senate vote failed to override the vetoes.[21]
On 24 April 2022, the DSCA notified Congress that Secretary of StateAntony Blinkenhad determined that "an emergency exists requiring the sale of non-standard ammunition" to Ukraine "in the national security interest of the United States" to invoke the AECA Section 36 emergency waiver provision.[22]
On 8 December 2023, DSCA notified Congress that Secretary Blinken had determined "an emergency exists which requires the immediate sale" of155 mm artillery roundsand "related equipment" and120 mm tank shellstoIsraelto invoke the AECA Section 36(b) emergency waiver.[23][24]
End-use Monitoring
editForeign governments must agree to U.S.-provided defense articles, training and services only for their intended purpose. End-use monitoring (EUM) is typically performed by U.S. government personnel assigned to the Security Cooperation Office in the foreign country.[9]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^abTwardowski, Adam (2019-06-11)."Advancing U.S. interests through security cooperation".Brookings Institution.Retrieved2021-02-15.
- ^abcMehta, Aaron (2020-12-04)."America sold $175 billion in weapons abroad in FY20".Defense News.Retrieved2022-08-08.
- ^Theohary, Catherine A. (21 December 2015)."Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 2007-2014".Congressional Research Service.p. 16.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^abcdLucas, Nathan J.; Vassalotti, Michael J. (21 February 2020)."Transfer of Defense Articles: Foreign Military Sales (FMS)".Congressional Research Service.p. 2.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"Foreign Military Sales (FMS) | Defense Security Cooperation Agency".www.dsca.mil.Retrieved2022-08-08.
- ^abAgmon, Marcy; Bonomo, James; Kennedy, Michael; Leed, Maren; Watman, Ken; Webb, Katharine; Wolf, Charles (1996).Arms Proliferation Policy: Support to the Presidential Advisory Board.RAND Corporation. pp. 29–30.doi:10.7249/mr771.ISBN978-0-8330-2403-9.
- ^"U.S. Arms Sales and Defense Trade".U.S. Department of State.20 January 2021.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"Fiscal Year 2023 U.S. Arms Transfers and Defense Trade".U.S. Department of State.2024-01-29.Retrieved2024-02-05.
- ^abcdefghForeign Customer Guide(PDF).Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 15 July 2018. p. 20.
- ^"C5 - Foreign Military Sales Case Development".Security Assistance Management Manual.Defense Security Cooperation Agency. p. 21.
- ^"Case Identifier | Defense Security Cooperation Agency".samm.dsca.mil.Retrieved2024-05-24.
- ^"U.S. Military Code Names".designation-systems.net.Retrieved25 March2015.
- ^"Defense Transportation System (DTS) | Defense Security Cooperation Agency".samm.dsca.mil.Retrieved2024-05-24.
- ^Kerr, Paul K. (4 January 2024)."Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process".Congressional Research Service.p. 2.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^Pompeo, Michael R. (24 May 2019)."Emergency Notification of Arms Sales to Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia".U.S. Department of State.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) – JAVELIN GUIDED MISSILES".Defense Security Cooperation Agency.24 May 2019.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) – RQ-21A BLACKJACK UNMANNED AIR VEHICLES".Defense Security Cooperation Agency.24 May 2019.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) – ADVANCED PRECISION KILL WEAPON SYSTEM (APKWS)".Defense Security Cooperation Agency.24 May 2019.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^Shear, Michael D.; Edmondson, Catie (24 July 2019)."Trump Vetoes Bipartisan Resolutions Blocking Arms Sales to Gulf Nations".The New York Times.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^Demirjian, Karoun; Itkowitz, Colby (24 July 2019)."Trump vetoes Congress's attempt to block arms sales to Saudi Arabia".The Washington Post.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^Catie, Edmondson (29 July 2019)."Senate Fails to Override Trump's Veto on Saudi Arms Sales".The New York Times.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"UKRAINE – NON-STANDARD AMMUNITION".Defense Security Cooperation Agency.25 April 2022.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"ISRAEL – M830A1 120MM TANK CARTRIDGES".Defense Security and Cooperation Agency.9 December 2023.Retrieved24 May2024.
- ^"ISRAEL – 155MM ARTILLERY AMMUNITION".Defense Security Cooperation Agency.29 December 2023.Retrieved24 May2024.