George III(George William Frederick; 4 June 1738 – 29 January 1820) wasKing of Great BritainandIrelandfrom 25 October 1760 until his death in 1820. TheActs of Union 1800unifiedGreat BritainandIrelandinto theUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,with George as its king. He was concurrently Duke andPrince-electorofHanoverin theHoly Roman Empirebefore becomingKing of Hanoveron 12 October 1814. He was a monarch of theHouse of Hanover,who, unlike his two predecessors, was born in Great Britain, spoke English as his first language,[1]and never visited Hanover.[2]

George III
Full-length portrait in oils of a clean-shaven young George in eighteenth century dress: gold jacket and breeches, ermine cloak, powdered wig, white stockings, and buckled shoes.
Reign25 October 1760 –29 January 1820
Coronation22 September 1761
PredecessorGeorge II
SuccessorGeorge IV
RegentGeorge, Prince of Wales (1811‍–‍1820)
Born(1738-06-04)4 June 1738 [NS][c]
Norfolk House,St James's Square, London, England
Died29 January 1820(1820-01-29)(aged 81)
Windsor Castle,Berkshire, England
Burial16 February 1820
Spouse
(m.1761; died 1818)
Issue
Names
George William Frederick
HouseHanover
FatherFrederick, Prince of Wales
MotherPrincess Augusta of Saxe-Gotha
ReligionAnglicanism
SignatureHandwritten "George" with a huge leading "G" and a large capital "R" at the end for "Rex"

George was born during the reign of his paternal grandfather,King George II,as the first son ofFrederick, Prince of Wales,andPrincess Augusta of Saxe-Gotha.Following his father's death in 1751, Prince George becameheir apparentandPrince of Wales.He succeeded to the throne on George II's death in 1760. The following year, he marriedPrincess Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz,with whom he had 15 children. George III's life and reign were marked by a series of military conflicts involving his kingdoms, much of the rest of Europe, and places farther afield in Africa, the Americas and Asia. Early in his reign, Great Britain defeatedFrancein theSeven Years' War,becoming the dominant European power in North America and India. However, Britain lost13 of its North American coloniesin theAmerican War of Independence.Further wars againstrevolutionaryandNapoleonic Francefrom 1793 concluded in the defeat ofNapoleonat theBattle of Waterlooin 1815. In 1807, thetransatlantic slave tradewas banned from theBritish Empire.

In the later part of his life, George had recurrent and eventually permanentmental illness.The exact nature of the mental illness is not known definitively, but historians and medical experts have suggested that his symptoms and behaviour traits were consistent with eitherbipolar disorderorporphyria.In 1810, George suffered a final relapse, and his eldest son,the Prince of Wales,was namedPrince Regentthe following year. The King died aged 81, at which time the Regent succeeded him as George IV. George III reigned during much of theGeorgianandRegencyeras. At the time of his death, he was thelongest-livedandlongest-reigning British monarch,having reigned for 59 years and 96 days; he remains the longest-lived and longest-reigning male monarch in British history.

Early life

Prince George (right), his brotherPrince Edward,and their tutor,Francis Ayscough(laterDeanofBristol), byRichard Wilson,c. 1749

George was born inNorfolk HouseinSt James's Square,London, on 4 June 1738.[c]He was a grandson ofKing George IIand the eldest son ofFrederick, Prince of Wales,andAugusta of Saxe-Gotha.As he was born two months prematurely, and thought unlikely to survive, he was baptised the same day byThomas Secker,who was both Rector ofSt James's Church, Piccadilly,andBishop of Oxford.[3][4]One month later, he was publicly baptised at Norfolk House, again by Secker. His godparents wereKing Frederick I of Sweden(for whomLord Baltimorestood proxy), his uncleFrederick III, Duke of Saxe-Gotha(for whomLord Carnarvonstood proxy), and his great-auntSophia Dorothea, Queen in Prussia(for whomLady Charlotte Edwinstood proxy).[5]

George grew into a healthy, reserved and shy child. The family moved toLeicester Square,where George and his younger brotherEdward(laterDuke of York and Albany) were educated together by private tutors. Family letters show that he could read and write in both English and German, as well as comment on political events of the time, by the age of eight.[6]He was the firstBritish monarchto study science systematically.[7]

Apart from chemistry and physics, his lessons included astronomy, mathematics, French, Latin, history, music, geography, commerce, agriculture and constitutional law, along with sporting and social accomplishments such as dancing, fencing and riding. His religious education was whollyAnglican.[7]At the age of 10, George took part in a family production ofJoseph Addison's playCatoand said in the new prologue: "What, tho' a boy! It may with truth be said, A boy inEnglandborn, in England bred. "[8]HistorianRomney Sedgwickargued that these lines appear "to be the source of the only historical phrase with which he is associated".[9]

King George II disliked Prince Frederick and took little interest in his grandchildren. However, in 1751, Frederick died unexpectedly from a lung injury at the age of 44, and his son George becameheir apparentto the throne and inherited his father's title ofDuke of Edinburgh.The King now took more interest in his grandson and created himPrince of Walesthree weeks later.[10][11]

Pastel portrait of George asPrince of WalesbyJean-Étienne Liotard,1754

In the spring of 1756, as George approached his eighteenth birthday, the King offered him a grand establishment atSt James's Palace,but George refused the offer, guided by his mother and her confidant,Lord Bute,who later served asprime minister.[12]George's mother, now theDowagerPrincess of Wales, preferred to keep George at home where she could imbue him with her strict moral values.[13][14]

Accession and marriage

In 1759, George was smitten withLady Sarah Lennox,sister ofCharles Lennox, 3rd Duke of Richmond,but Lord Bute advised against the match and George abandoned his thoughts of marriage. "I am born for the happiness or misery of a great nation," he wrote, "and consequently must often act contrary to my passions."[15]Nevertheless, George and his mother resisted attempts by the King to marry George toPrincess Sophie Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.[16]Sophie Caroline instead marriedFrederick, Margrave of Bayreuth.[17]

The following year, at the age of 22, George succeeded to the throne when his grandfather George II died suddenly on 25 October 1760, at age 76. The search for a suitable wife intensified: after giving consideration to a number ofProtestantGerman princesses, George's mother sentColonel David Graemewith, on her son's behalf, an offer of marriage toPrincess Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz.Charlotte accepted. While aroyal householdand staff were assembled for Charlotte in London,Lord Harcourt,the royalMaster of the Horse,escorted her from Strelitz to London. Charlotte arrived in the afternoon of 8 September 1761 and the marriage ceremony was conducted that same evening in theChapel Royal,St James's Palace.[18][d]George and Charlotte's coronationwas held atWestminster Abbeya fortnight later on 22 September. George never took a mistress (in contrast with his grandfather and his sons), and the couple enjoyed a happy marriage until his mental illness struck.[1][8]

The King and Queen had 15 children—nine sons and six daughters. In 1762, George purchased Buckingham House (on the site now occupied byBuckingham Palace) for use as a family retreat.[20]His other residences wereKew PalaceandWindsor Castle.St James's Palace was retained for official use. He did not travel extensively and spent his entire life in southern England. In the 1790s, the King and his family took holidays atWeymouth, Dorset,[21]which he thus popularised as one of the first seaside resorts in England.[22]

Early reign

Early regnal years

George, in his accession speech to Parliament, proclaimed: "Born and educated in this country, I glory in the name of Britain."[23]He inserted this phrase into the speech, written byLord Hardwicke,to demonstrate his desire to distance himself from his German forebears, who were perceived as caring more for Hanover than for Britain.[24]During George III's lengthy reign, Britain was aconstitutional monarchy,ruled by his ministerial government and prominent men in Parliament.[25]Although his accession was at first welcomed by politicians of all parties,[e]the first years of his reign were marked by political instability, largely as a result of disagreements over theSeven Years' War.[27]George came to be perceived as favouringToryministers, which led to his denunciation by theWhigsas anautocrat.[1]

On his accession, theCrown landsproduced relatively little income; most revenue was generated through taxes and excise duties. George surrendered theCrown Estateto Parliamentary control in return for acivil listannuity for the support of his household and the expenses of civil government.[28]Claims that he used the income to reward supporters with bribes and gifts[29]are disputed by historians who say such claims "rest on nothing but falsehoods put out by disgruntled opposition".[30]Debts amounting to over £3 million over the course of George's reign were paid by Parliament, and the civil list annuity was increased from time to time.[31]He aided theRoyal Academy of Artswith large grants from his private funds,[32]and may have donated more than half of his personal income to charity.[33]Of his art collection, the two most notable purchases areJohannes Vermeer'sLady at the Virginalsand a set ofCanalettos,but it is as a collector of books that he is best remembered.[34]TheKing's Librarywas open and available to scholars and was the foundation of a new national library.[35]

Legislation and politics

Portrait byAllan Ramsay,1762

In May 1762, the incumbent Whig government ofThomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle,was replaced with one led by Lord Bute, a Scottish Tory. Bute's opponents worked against him by spreading the calumny that he was having an affair with the King's mother, and by exploitinganti-Scottish sentimentamongst the English.[36]John Wilkes,a member of parliament, publishedThe North Briton,which was both inflammatory and defamatory in its condemnation of Bute and the government. Wilkes was eventually arrested forseditious libelbut he fled to France to escape punishment; he was expelled from theHouse of Commonsand found guiltyin absentiaof blasphemy and libel.[37]In 1763, after concluding thePeace of Pariswhich ended the war, Lord Bute resigned, allowing the Whigs underGeorge Grenvilleto return to power. Britain received enormous concessions, includingWest Florida.Britain restored to France lucrative slave-sugar islands in theWest Indies,includingGuadeloupeandMartinique.France cededCanadato Britain, in addition to all land between theAllegheny Mountainsand theMississippi River,exceptNew Orleans,which was ceded to Spain.[38]

Later that year, theRoyal Proclamation of 1763placed a limit upon the westward expansion of the American colonies and created anIndian reserve.The Proclamation aimed to divert colonial expansion to the north (toNova Scotia) and to the south (Florida), and protect the British fur trade with the Indians.[39]The Proclamation Line did not bother the majority of settled farmers, but it was unpopular with a vocal minority. This discontent ultimately contributed to conflict between the colonists and the British government.[40]With the American colonists generally unburdened by British taxes, the government thought it appropriate for them to pay towards the defence of the colonies against native uprisings and the possibility of French incursions.[f]

The central issue for the colonists was not the amount of taxes but whether Parliament could levy a tax without American approval, for there were no American seats in Parliament.[43]The Americans protested that like all Englishmen they had rights to "no taxation without representation".In 1765, Grenville introduced theStamp Act,which levied astamp dutyon every document in the British colonies in North America. Since newspapers were printed on stamped paper, those most affected by the introduction of the duty were the most effective at producing propaganda opposing the tax.[44]

Meanwhile, George had become exasperated at Grenville's attempts to reduce the King's prerogatives, and tried, unsuccessfully, to persuadeWilliam Pitt the Elderto accept the office of prime minister.[45]After a brief illness, which may have presaged his illnesses to come, George settled onLord Rockinghamto form a ministry, and dismissed Grenville.[46]

Bust byJohn van Nost the younger,1767

Lord Rockingham, with the support of Pitt and the King, repealed Grenville's unpopular Stamp Act. Rockingham's government was weak, and he was replaced as prime minister in 1766 by Pitt, whom George createdEarl of Chatham.The actions of Lord Chatham and George III in repealing the Act were so popular in America that statues of them both were erected inNew York City.[47]Lord Chatham fell ill in 1767, andAugustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton,took over the government. Grafton did not formally become prime minister until 1768. That year, John Wilkes returned to England, stood as a candidate in thegeneral election,and came top of the poll in theMiddlesex constituency.Wilkes was again expelled from Parliament. He was re-elected and expelled twice more, before the House of Commons resolved that his candidature was invalid and declaredthe runner-upas the victor.[48]Grafton's government disintegrated in 1770, allowing the Tories led byLord Northto return to power.[49]

Family issues and discontent in America

Portrait byJohan Zoffany,1771

George was deeply devout and spent hours in prayer,[50]but his piety was not shared by his brothers. George was appalled by what he saw as their loose morals. In 1770, his brotherPrince Henry, Duke of Cumberland and Strathearn,was exposed as an adulterer. The following year, Henry married a young widow,Anne Horton.The King considered her inappropriate as a royal bride: she was from a lower social class and German law barred any children of the couple from the Hanoverian succession.[51]

George insisted on a new law that essentially forbade members of the royal family from legally marrying without the consent of the sovereign. The subsequent bill was unpopular in Parliament, including among George's own ministers, but passed as theRoyal Marriages Act 1772.Shortly afterwards, another of George's brothers,Prince William Henry, Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh,revealed he had been secretly married toMaria, Countess Waldegrave,the illegitimate daughter of SirEdward Walpole.The news confirmed George's opinion that he had been right to introduce the law: Maria was related to his political opponents. Neither lady was ever received at court.[51]

Lord North's government was chiefly concerned with discontent in America. To assuage American opinion most of the custom duties were withdrawn, except for the tea duty, which in George's words was "one tax to keep up the right [to levy taxes]".[52]In 1773, the tea ships moored inBoston Harborwere boarded by colonists and the tea was thrown overboard, an event that became known as theBoston Tea Party.In Britain, opinion hardened against the colonists, with Chatham now agreeing with North that the destruction of the tea was "certainly criminal".[53]

With the clear support of Parliament, Lord North introduced measures, which were called theIntolerable Actsby the colonists: thePort of Bostonwas shut down and thecharterofMassachusettswasalteredso that the upper house of the legislature was appointed bythe Crowninstead of elected by the lower house.[54]Up to this point, in the words of Professor Peter Thomas, George's "hopes were centred on a political solution, and he always bowed to his cabinet's opinions even when sceptical of their success. The detailed evidence of the years from 1763 to 1775 tends to exonerate George III from any real responsibility for theAmerican Revolution."[55]Though both the Americans and older British historians characterised George as a tyrant, in these years he acted as a constitutional monarch supporting the initiatives of his ministers.[56]

American War of Independence

Pulling Down the Statue of George III at Bowling Green, 9 July 1776,William Walcutt(1854)

TheAmerican War of Independencewas the culmination of the civil and politicalAmerican Revolution.In the 1760s, a series of acts by Parliament was met with resistance in Britain'sThirteen Coloniesin America. In particular they rejected new taxes levied by Parliament, a body in which they had no direct representation. The colonies had previously enjoyed a high level of autonomy in their internal affairs and viewed Parliament's acts as a denial of theirrights as Englishmen.[57]Armed conflict began between British regulars and colonial militiamen at theBattles of Lexington and Concordin April 1775. TheSecond Continental Congresssentpetitions to the Crown for intervention with Parliament,but the King and Parliament ignored them. George declared the American leadersto be traitorsand a year of fighting ensued.Thomas Paine's bookCommon Sensereferred to George III as "the Royal Brute of Great Britain".[58]

The coloniesdeclared their independencein July 1776, listingtwenty-seven grievancesagainst the British king and legislature while asking the support of the populace. Among George's other offenses, the declaration charged, "He has abdicated Government here... He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people." The gilded equestrian statue of the King in New York was pulled down.[59]The British captured the city in 1776 but lost Boston, and thegrand strategic planof invading from Canada and cutting off New England failed with the surrender of British Lieutenant-GeneralJohn Burgoynefollowing thebattles of Saratoga.[60]

Prime MinisterLord Northwas not an ideal war leader, but George III managed to give Parliament a sense of purpose to fight, and North was able to keephis cabinettogether. North's cabinet ministersthe Earl of Sandwich,First Lord of the Admiralty, andLord George Germain,Secretary of State for the Colonies, proved to lack leadership skills suited for their positions.[61]

George III is often accused of obstinately trying to keep Great Britain at war with the rebels, despite the opinions of his own ministers.[62]In the words of British historianGeorge Otto Trevelyan,the King was determined "never to acknowledge the independence of the Americans, and to punish their contumacy by the indefinite prolongation of a war which promised to be eternal."[63]He wanted to "keep the rebels harassed, anxious, and poor, until the day when, by a natural and inevitable process, discontent and disappointment were converted into penitence and remorse".[64]Later historians defend George by saying that, in the context of the times, no king would willingly surrender such a large territory,[8][65]and his conduct was far less ruthless than contemporaneous monarchs in Europe.[66]After Saratoga, both Parliament and the British people were in favour of the war; recruitment ran at high levels and political opponents, though vocal, remained a small minority.[8][67]

Portrait byJohann Heinrich von Hurter[de],1781 (Royal Collection)

With the setbacks in America, Lord North asked to transfer power toLord Chatham,whom he thought more capable, but George refused to do so; he suggested instead that Chatham serve as a subordinate minister in North's administration, but Chatham refused; he died later in the same year.[68]North was allied to the "King's Friends" in Parliament and believed that George III had the right to exercise powers.[69]In early 1778,Louis XVIof France (Britain's chief rival) signed atreaty of alliancewith the United States.[70]The French fleet outran the British naval blockade of the Mediterranean and sailed to America.[70]The conflict now affected America, Europe, and India.[70]Charles III of Spainhad misgivings because of his own colonies but decided to side with France in the war in limited fashion in 1779.[71]One faction of theDutch Republicaided the Americans, whereas another aided Britain, whose allies includedLoyalistsandGerman auxiliaries.Lord GowerandLord Weymouthboth resigned from the government. Lord North again requested that he also be allowed to resign, but he stayed in office at George III's insistence.[72]

During the summer of 1779, a combined French-Spanish naval fleet threatened to invade England and transport 31,000 French troops across theEnglish Channel.George III said that Britain was confronted by the "most serious crisis the nation ever knew". In August, 66 warships entered the English channel, but sickness, hunger, and adverse winds forced the French-Spanisharmadato withdraw, ending the invasion threat.[73]

In late 1779, George III advocated sending more British warships and troops across the Atlantic to the West Indies. He boldly said: "We must risk something, otherwise we will only vegetate in this war. I own I wish either with spirit to get through it, or with a crash be ruined." In January 1780, 7,000 British troops under General SirJohn Vaughanwere transported to the West Indies.[74]Nonetheless, opposition to the costly war was increasing, and in June 1780 contributed to disturbances in London known as theGordon riots.[75]

As late as thesiege of Charlestonin 1780, Loyalists could still believe in their eventual victory, as British troops inflicted defeats on the Continental forces at theBattle of Camdenand theBattle of Guilford Court House.[76]In late 1781, the news ofLord Cornwallis's surrender at thesiege of Yorktownreached London; North's parliamentary support ebbed away and he resigned the following year. George drafted an abdication notice, which was never delivered.[65][77]He finally accepted the defeat in America and authorized peace negotiations. Britain formally recognized the independence of the United States in theTreaties of Parissigned in 1782 and 1783.[78]In early 1783, George III privately conceded "America is lost!" He reflected that the Northern colonies had developed into Britain's "successful rivals" in commercial trade and fishing.[79]Up to 70,000 Loyalists fled toCanada,theCaribbean,or England.[80]

John Adamswas appointed American minister to London in 1785, by which time George had become resigned to the new relationship between his country and the former colonies. He told Adams, "I was the last to consent to the separation; but the separation having been made and having become inevitable, I have always said, as I say now, that I would be the first to meet the friendship of the United States as an independent power."[81]

Mid reign

Government

InA new way to pay the National Debt(1786),James Gillraycaricatured King George III and Queen Charlotte awash with treasury funds to cover royal debts, with Pitt handing him anothermoney bag.

With the collapse of Lord North's ministry in 1782, the Whig Lord Rockingham became prime minister for the second time, but died within months. The King then appointedLord Shelburneto replace him.Charles James Fox,however, refused to serve under Shelburne, and demanded the appointment ofWilliam Cavendish-Bentinck, 3rd Duke of Portland.In 1783, the House of Commons forced Shelburne from office and his government was replaced by theFox–North Coalition.Portland became prime minister, with Fox and Lord North, as foreign secretary and home secretary respectively.[8]

The King disliked Fox intensely, for his politics as well as his character: he thought Fox unprincipled and a bad influence on the Prince of Wales.[82]George III was distressed at having to appoint ministers not of his liking, but the Portland ministry quickly built up a majority in the House of Commons, and could not be displaced easily. He was further dismayed when the government introduced the India Bill, which proposed to reform the government of India by transferring political power from theEast India Companyto Parliamentary commissioners.[83]Although George actually favoured greater control over the company, the proposed commissioners were all political allies of Fox.[84]Immediately after the House of Commons passed it, George authorisedLord Templeto inform theHouse of Lordsthat he would regard any peer who voted for the bill as his enemy. The bill was rejected by the Lords; three days later, the Portland ministry was dismissed, andWilliam Pitt the Youngerwas appointed prime minister, with Temple as his secretary of state. On 17 December 1783, Parliament voted in favour of a motion condemning the influence of the monarch in parliamentary voting as a "high crime" and Temple was forced to resign. Temple's departure destabilised the government, and three months later the government lost its majority and Parliament was dissolved; the subsequentelectiongave Pitt a firm mandate.[8]

The Three Youngest Daughters of King George IIIbyJohn Singleton Copley,c. 1785,depicting: PrincessesMary(left with tambourine),Sophia(upper right), andAmelia(baby).

Pitt's appointment was a great victory for George. It proved that the King could appoint prime ministers on the basis of his own interpretation of the public mood without having to follow the choice of the current majority in the House of Commons. Throughout Pitt's ministry, George supported many of Pitt's political aims and created new peers at an unprecedented rate to increase the number of Pitt's supporters in the House of Lords.[85]During and after Pitt's ministry, George was extremely popular in Britain.[86]The British people admired him for his piety and for remaining faithful to his wife.[87]He was fond of his children and was devastated at the death of two of his sons in infancy, in 1782 and 1783 respectively.[88]Nevertheless, he set his children a strict regimen. They were expected to attend rigorous lessons from seven in the morning and to lead lives of religious observance and virtue.[89]When his children strayed from George's principles of righteousness, as his sons did as young adults, he was dismayed and disappointed.[90]

Illness

Goldguineaof George III, 1789

By this time, George's health was deteriorating. He had a mental illness characterised by acutemania.Until the mid-20th century, the King's illness was generally considered to be psychological. In 1966, a study by Ida Macalpine andRichard Huntersuggested that the illness was physiological, caused by the liver disorderporphyria.[91]Although meeting with some contemporary opposition,[92]the view gained widespread scholarly acceptance.[93]A study of samples of George's hair published in 2005 revealed high levels ofarsenic,a cause of metabolic blood disorders and thus a possible trigger for porphyria. The source of the arsenic is not known, but it could have been a component of medicines or cosmetics.[94]The theory was also established in the public mind through influential dramatisations, such asAlan Bennett's playThe Madness of George III,and inNicholas Hytner's subsequentfilm.From 2010 this view has been increasingly challenged, and Macalpine and Hunter's study criticised.[95][96][97]Recent scholarship discounts the porphyria theory and contends that George's illness was psychiatric, most probablybipolar disorder.[98]

George may have had a brief episode of disease in 1765, and a longer episode began in the summer of 1788. At the end of the parliamentary session, he went toCheltenham Spato recuperate and in August visited theBishop of WorcesteratHartlebury Castle[99]andViscount Mount EdgcumbeatCotehele,Cornwall, with the Queen, and their daughters the Princess Royal and Princesses Augusta and Elizabeth.[100]It was the furthest he had ever been from London, but his condition worsened. In November of that year, he became seriously deranged, sometimes speaking for many hours without pause, causing him to foam at the mouth and his voice to become hoarse. George would frequently repeat himself and write sentences with over 400 words at a time, and his vocabulary became "more complex, creative and colourful", possible symptoms of bipolar disorder.[101]His doctors were largely at a loss to explain his illness, and spurious stories about his condition spread, such as the claim that he had shaken hands with a tree in the mistaken belief that it was theKing of Prussia.[102]Treatment for mental illness was primitive by modern standards; George's doctors, who includedFrancis Willis,treated the King by forcibly restraining him until he was calm, or applying causticpoulticesto draw out "evil humours".[103]

In the reconvened Parliament, Fox and Pitt wrangled over the terms of a regency during the King's incapacity. While both agreed that it would be most reasonable for the Prince of Wales to act as regent, Fox suggested, to Pitt's consternation, that it was the Prince's absolute right to act on his ill father's behalf with full powers. Pitt, fearing he would be removed from office if the Prince of Wales were empowered, argued that it was for Parliament to nominate a regent, and wanted to restrict the regent's authority.[104]In February 1789, theRegency Bill,authorising the Prince of Wales to act as regent, was introduced and passed in the House of Commons, but before the House of Lords could pass the bill, George recovered.[105]

Later reign

War in Europe

Portrait by SirWilliam Beechey,1799/1800
Caricature byJames Gillrayof George holding Napoleon in the palm of his hand, 1803

After George's recovery, his popularity, and that of Pitt, continued to increase at the expense of Fox and the Prince of Wales.[106]His humane and understanding treatment of two insane assailants,Margaret Nicholsonin 1786 andJohn Frithin 1790, contributed to his popularity.[107]James Hadfield's failed attempt to shoot George in theTheatre Royal, Drury Lane,on 15 May 1800 was not political in origin but motivated by the apocalyptic delusions of Hadfield andBannister Truelock.George seemed unperturbed by the incident, so much so that he fell asleep in the interval.[108]

TheFrench Revolutionof 1789, in which theFrench monarchyhad been overthrown, worried many British landowners. France declared war on Great Britain in 1793; in response to the crisis, George allowed Pitt to increase taxes, raise armies, and suspend the right ofhabeas corpus.Pittprosecuted British radicals for treasonin 1794, and in October 1795, crowds attacked George's carriage on his way to opening Parliament, demanding an end to the war and lower bread prices. In response, Parliament passed theTreasonandSeditious MeetingsActs a month later.[109]TheFirst Coalitionto oppose revolutionary France, which included Austria, Prussia, and Spain, broke up in 1795 when Prussia and Spain made separate peace with France.[110]TheSecond Coalition,which included Austria, Russia, and theOttoman Empire,was defeated in 1800. Only Great Britain was left fightingNapoleon Bonaparte,theFirst Consulof theFrench Republic.

A brief lull in hostilities allowed Pitt to concentrate effort on Ireland, where there had been an uprising and attempted French landing in 1798.[111]In 1800, the British and Irish Parliaments passed anAct of Unionthat took effect on 1 January 1801 and united Great Britain and Ireland into a single state, known as the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". George used the opportunity to abandon the title "king of France", whichEnglish and British sovereigns had maintainedsince the reign ofEdward III.[112]It was suggested that George adopt the title "Emperor of the British Isles",but he refused.[8]As part of his Irish policy, Pitt planned to remove certainlegal disabilitiesthat applied toRoman Catholics.George III claimed that to emancipate Catholics would be to violate hiscoronation oath,in which sovereigns promise to maintain Protestantism.[113]Faced with opposition to his religious reform policies from both the King and the British public, Pitt threatened to resign.[114]At about the same time, George had a relapse of his previous illness, which he blamed on worry over the Catholic question.[115]On 14 March 1801, Pitt was formally replaced by theSpeaker of the House of Commons,Henry Addington.Addington opposed emancipation, instituted annual accounts, abolished income tax and began a programme of disarmament. In October 1801, he made peace with the French, and in 1802 signed theTreaty of Amiens.[116]

George did not consider the peace with France as real; in his view it was an "experiment".[117]The war resumed in 1803, but public opinion distrusted Addington to lead the nation in war, and instead favoured Pitt. An invasion of England by Napoleon seemed imminent, and a massive volunteer movement arose to defend England against the French. George's review of 27,000 volunteers inHyde Park, London,on 26 and 28 October 1803 and at the height of the invasion scare, attracted an estimated 500,000 spectators on each day.[118]The Timessaid: "The enthusiasm of the multitude was beyond all expression."[119]A courtier wrote on 13 November that "The King is really prepared to take the field in case of attack, his beds are ready and he can move at half an hour's warning."[120]George wrote to his friendBishop Hurd,"We are here in daily expectation that Bonaparte will attempt his threatened invasion... Should his troops effect a landing, I shall certainly put myself at the head of mine, and my other armed subjects, to repel them."[121]AfterAdmiral Lord Nelson's famous naval victory at theBattle of Trafalgar,the possibility of invasion was extinguished.[122]

InA Kick at the Broad-Bottoms!(1807), James Gillray caricatured George's dismissal of the Ministry of All the Talents.

In 1804, George's recurrent illness returned; after his recovery, Addington resigned and Pitt regained power. Pitt sought to appoint Fox to his ministry, but George refused.Lord Grenvilleperceived an injustice to Fox, and refused to join the new ministry.[8]Pitt concentrated on forming a coalition with Austria, Russia, and Sweden. ThisThird Coalition,however, met the same fate as the First and Second Coalitions, collapsing in 1805. The setbacks in Europe took a toll on Pitt's health, and he died in 1806, reopening the question of who should serve in the ministry. Grenville became prime minister, and his "Ministry of All the Talents"included Fox. Grenville pushed through theSlave Trade Act 1807,which passed both houses of Parliament with large majorities.[123]George was conciliatory towards Fox, after being forced to capitulate over his appointment. After Fox's death in September 1806, the King and ministry were in open conflict. To boost recruitment, the ministry proposed a measure in February 1807 whereby Roman Catholics would be allowed to serve in all ranks of the armed forces. George instructed them not only to drop the measure, but also to agree never to set up such a measure again. The ministers agreed to drop the measure then pending, but refused to bind themselves in the future.[124]They were dismissed and replaced by the Duke of Portland, as the nominal prime minister, with actual power being held by theChancellor of the Exchequer,Spencer Perceval.Parliament was dissolved, and thesubsequent electiongave the ministry a strong majority in the House of Commons. George III made no further major political decisions during his reign; the replacement of Portland by Perceval in 1809 was of little real significance.[125]

Final years

Engraving byHenry Meyer,1817, depicting an elderly George

In late 1810, at the height of his popularity,[126]King George, already virtually blind withcataractsand in pain fromrheumatism,suffered a relapse into his mental disorder and became dangerously ill. In his view, the malady had been triggered by stress over the death of his youngest and favourite daughter,Princess Amelia.[127]The princess's nurse reported that "the scenes of distress and crying every day... were melancholy beyond description. "[128]George accepted the need for theRegency Act 1811,[129]and the Prince of Wales (laterGeorge IV) acted as regent for the remainder of the King's life. Despite signs of a recovery in May 1811, by the end of the year, George III had become permanently insane, and lived in seclusion at Windsor Castle until his death.[130]

Prime Minister Spencer Perceval wasassassinated in 1812and was replaced byLord Liverpool.Liverpool oversaw British victory in the Napoleonic Wars. The subsequentCongress of Viennaled to significant territorial gains for Hanover, which was elevated from anelectorateto akingdom.Meanwhile, George's health deteriorated. He developeddementia,and became completely blind and increasingly deaf. He was incapable of knowing or understanding that he was declared King of Hanover in 1814, or that his wife died in 1818.[131]At Christmas 1819, he spoke nonsense for 58 hours, and for the last few weeks of his life was unable to walk.[132]

He died ofpneumoniaatWindsor Castleat 8:38 pm on 29 January 1820, six days after the death of his fourth sonPrince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn.[133]His favourite son,Prince Frederick, Duke of York and Albany,was with him.[134]George IIIlay in statefor two days, and his funeral and interment took place on 16 February inSt George's Chapel, Windsor Castle.[133][135][136]

Slavery

Dunmore's Proclamation,by the King's authority, set free Rebel slaves.

Over the course of George's reign, a coalition ofabolitionistsandAtlantic slaveuprisings caused the British public to spurn slavery. According to the historianAndrew Roberts,"George never bought or sold a slave in his life. He never invested in any of the companies that did such a thing. He signed legislation to abolish slavery." George wrote a document in the 1750s "denouncing all of the arguments for slavery, and calling them an execration and ridiculous and 'absurd',"[137]but the King and his son, theDuke of Clarence,supported the efforts of theLondon Society of West India Planters and Merchantsto delay the abolition of the British slave trade for almost 20 years.[138][139]William Pitt the Youngerconversely wished to see slavery abolished but, because the cabinet was divided and the King was in the pro-slavery camp,[123]Pitt decided to refrain from making abolition official government policy. Instead, he worked toward abolition in an individual capacity.[140]

On 7 November 1775, during the American War of Independence,John Murray, Lord Dunmore,issued a proclamation that offered freedom to the slaves of Rebel masters if they enlisted to put down the colonial rebellion. Dunmore was the lastRoyal Governor of Virginia,appointed by King George III in July 1771.Dunmore's Proclamationinspired slaves to escape from captivity and fight for the British. On 30 June 1779, George III's Commanding GeneralHenry Clintonbroadened Dunmore's proclamation with hisPhilipsburg Proclamation.For all colonial slaves who fled their Rebel masters, Clinton forbade their recapture and resale, giving them protection by the British military. Approximately 20,000 freed slaves joined the British, fighting for George III. In 1783, given British certificates of freedom, 3,000 former slaves, including their families, settled inNova Scotia.[141]

Between 1791 and 1800, almost 400,000 Africans were shipped to the Americas, by 1,340 slaving voyages, mounted from British ports, includingLiverpoolandBristol.On 25 March 1807 George III signed into lawAn Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade,under which the transatlantic slave trade was banned in the British Empire.[142]

Legacy

George was succeeded by two of his sons, George IV andWilliam IVin turn, who both died without surviving legitimate children, leaving the throne toVictoria,the only legitimate child of his fourth son Prince Edward.

George III lived for 81 years and 239 days, and reigned for 59 years and 96 days: both his life and his reign were longer than those of any of his predecessors and subsequent kings; only queens Victoria andElizabeth IIlivedandreigned longer.

Extract fromObservations on the Transit of Venus,a manuscript notebook from the collections of George III, showing George, Charlotte and those attending them.

George III was dubbed "Farmer George" by satirists, at first to mock his interest in mundane matters rather than politics, but later to portray him as a man of the people, contrasting his homely thrift with his son's grandiosity.[143]Under George III, theBritish Agricultural Revolutionreached its peak and great advances were made in fields such as science and industry. There was unprecedented growth in the rural population, which in turn provided much of the workforce for the concurrentIndustrial Revolution.[144]George's collection of mathematical and scientific instruments is now owned byKing's College Londonbut housed in theScience Museum, London,to which it has been on long-term loan since 1927. He had theKing's Observatorybuilt inRichmond-upon-Thamesfor his own observations of the1769 transit of Venus.WhenWilliam HerscheldiscoveredUranusin 1781, he at first named itGeorgium Sidus(George's Star) after the King, who later funded the construction and maintenance of Herschel's 178540-foot telescope,which at the time was the biggest ever built.

George III hoped that "the tongue of malice may not paint my intentions in those colours she admires, nor the sycophant extoll me beyond what I deserve"[145]but, in the popular mind, George III has been both demonised and praised. While very popular at the start of his reign, by the mid-1770s George had lost the loyalty of revolutionary American colonists,[146]though it has been estimated that as many as half of the colonists remained loyal.[147]The grievances in theUnited States Declaration of Independencewere presented as "repeated injuries and usurpations" that he had committed to establish an "absolute Tyranny" over the colonies. The declaration's wording has contributed to the American public's perception of George as a tyrant. Contemporary accounts of George III's life fall into two camps: one demonstrating "attitudes dominant in the latter part of the reign, when the King had become a revered symbol of national resistance to French ideas and French power", while the other "derived their views of the King from the bitter partisan strife of the first two decades of the reign, and they expressed in their works the views of the opposition".[148]

Building on the latter of these two assessments, British historians of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, such asTrevelyanandErskine May,promoted hostile interpretations of George III's life. However, in the mid-twentieth century the work ofLewis Namier,who thought George was "much maligned", started a re-evaluation of the man and his reign.[149]Scholars of the later twentieth century, such asButterfieldand Pares, and Macalpine and Hunter,[150]are inclined to treat George sympathetically, seeing him as a victim of circumstance and illness. Butterfield rejected the arguments of his Victorian predecessors with withering disdain: "Erskine May must be a good example of the way in which an historian may fall into error through an excess of brilliance. His capacity for synthesis, and his ability to dovetail the various parts of the evidence... carried him into a more profound and complicated elaboration of error than some of his more pedestrian predecessors... he inserted a doctrinal element into his history which, granted his original aberrations, was calculated to project the lines of his error, carrying his work still further from centrality or truth."[151]In pursuing war with the American colonists, George III believed he was defending the right of an elected Parliament to levy taxes, rather than seeking to expand his own power or prerogatives.[152]In the opinion of modern scholars, during the long reign of George III, the monarchy continued to lose its political power and grew as the embodiment of national morality.[8]

Titles, styles, honours and arms

Titles and styles

  • 4 June 1738 – 31 March 1751:His Royal HighnessPrince George[153]
  • 31 March 1751 – 20 April 1751:His Royal HighnessThe Duke of Edinburgh
  • 20 April 1751 – 25 October 1760:His Royal HighnessThe Prince of Wales
  • 25 October 1760 – 29 January 1820:His MajestyThe King

In Great Britain, George III used the officialstyle"George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland,Defender of the Faith,and so forth ". In 1801, whenGreat Britainunited withIreland,he dropped the title of king of France, which had been used for every English monarch sinceEdward III'sclaim to the French thronein the medieval period.[112]His style became "George the Third, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith."[154]

In Germany, he was "Duke ofBrunswickandLüneburg,Arch-TreasurerandPrince-electorof theHoly Roman Empire"(Herzog von Braunschweig und Lüneburg, Erzschatzmeister und Kurfürst des Heiligen Römischen Reiches[155]) until the end of the empire in 1806. He then continued as duke until theCongress of Viennadeclared him "King of Hanover" in 1814.[154]

Honours

Arms

Before his succession, George was granted theroyal armsdifferenced by alabelof five pointsAzure,the centre point bearing afleur-de-lisOron 27 July 1749. Upon his father's death, and along with the dukedom of Edinburgh and the position of heir-apparent, he inherited his difference of a plain label of three pointsArgent.In an additional difference, the crown of Charlemagne was not usually depicted on thearms of the heir,only on the Sovereign's.[158]

From his succession until 1800, George bore the royal arms:Quarterly,IGulesthree lionspassant guardantinpaleOr (for England)impalingOr a lionrampantwithin atressureflory-counter-flory Gules (for Scotland); II Azure three fleurs-de-lys Or (for France); III Azure a harp Or stringed Argent (for Ireland); IVtierced per pale and per chevron(for Hanover), I Gules two lions passant guardant Or (for Brunswick), II Or asemyof hearts Gules a lion rampant Azure (for Lüneburg), III Gules a horsecourantArgent (for Saxony), overall an escutcheon Gules charged with thecrown of CharlemagneOr (for the dignity of Archtreasurer of the Holy Roman Empire).[159][160]

Following theActs of Union 1800,the royal arms were amended, dropping the French quartering. They became: Quarterly, I and IV England; II Scotland; III Ireland; overall an escutcheon of Hanover surmounted by an electoral bonnet.[161]In 1816, after theElectorate of Hanoverbecame a kingdom, the electoral bonnet was changed to a crown.[162]

Issue

Name Birth Death Notes[163]
George IV 12 August 1762 26 June 1830 Prince of Wales 1762–1820; married 1795,Princess Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel;had one daughter:Princess Charlotte
Prince Frederick, Duke of York and Albany 16 August 1763 5 January 1827 Married 1791,Princess Frederica of Prussia;no issue
William IV 21 August 1765 20 June 1837 Duke of Clarence and St Andrews; married 1818,Princess Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen;no surviving legitimate issue, but had illegitimate children withDorothea Jordan
Charlotte, Princess Royal 29 September 1766 6 October 1828 Married 1797,King Frederick of Württemberg;no surviving issue
Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn 2 November 1767 23 January 1820 Married 1818,Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld;had one daughter:Queen Victoria
Princess Augusta Sophia 8 November 1768 22 September 1840 Never married, no issue
Princess Elizabeth 22 May 1770 10 January 1840 Married 1818,Frederick VI, Landgrave of Hesse-Homburg;no issue
Ernest Augustus, King of Hanover 5 June 1771 18 November 1851 Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale 1799–1851; married 1815,Princess Friederike of Mecklenburg-Strelitz;had one son:George V of Hanover
Prince Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex 27 January 1773 21 April 1843 (1) Married 1793, in contravention of theRoyal Marriages Act 1772,Lady Augusta Murray;had issue; marriage annulled 1794
(2) Married 1831,Lady Cecilia Buggin(laterDuchess of Invernessin her own right); no issue
Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge 24 February 1774 8 July 1850 Married 1818,Princess Augusta of Hesse-Kassel;had issue
Princess Mary 25 April 1776 30 April 1857 Married 1816,Prince William Frederick, Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh;no issue
Princess Sophia 3 November 1777 27 May 1848 Never married, no issue
Prince Octavius 23 February 1779 3 May 1783 Died in childhood
Prince Alfred 22 September 1780 20 August 1782 Died in childhood
Princess Amelia 7 August 1783 2 November 1810 Never married, no issue

Ancestry

See also

Notes

  1. ^King of the United Kingdom from 1 January 1801, after theActs of Union 1800
  2. ^King from 12 October 1814
  3. ^abAll dates in this article are in theNew StyleGregorian calendar.George was born on 24 May in the Old StyleJulian calendarused in Great Britain until 1752.
  4. ^George was falsely said to have marriedHannah Lightfoot,aQuaker,on 17 April 1759, prior to his marriage to Charlotte, and to have had at least one child by her. However, Lightfoot had married Isaac Axford in 1753, and had died in or before 1759, so there could have been no legal marriage or children. The jury at the 1866 trial ofLavinia Ryves,the daughter of imposterOlivia Serreswho pretended to be "Princess Olive of Cumberland", unanimously found that a supposed marriage certificate produced by Ryves was a forgery.[19]
  5. ^For example, the letters ofHorace Walpolewritten at the time of the accession defended George but Walpole's later memoirs were hostile.[26]
  6. ^An American taxpayer would pay a maximum of sixpence a year, compared to an average of twenty-five shillings (50 times as much) in England.[41]In 1763, the total revenue from America amounted to about £1 800, while the estimated annual cost of the military in America was put at £225 000. By 1767, it had risen to £400 000.[42]

References

  1. ^abc"George III".Official website of the British monarchy.Royal Household. 31 December 2015.Retrieved18 April2016.
  2. ^Brooke, p. 314; Fraser, p. 277.
  3. ^Hibbert, p. 8.
  4. ^The Third Register Book of the Parish of St James in the Liberty of Westminster For Births & Baptisms. 1723–1741.24 May 1738.
  5. ^"No. 7712".The London Gazette.20 June 1738. p. 2.
  6. ^Brooke, pp. 23–41.
  7. ^abBrooke, pp. 42–44, 55.
  8. ^abcdefghiCannon, John (September 2004)."George III (1738–1820)".Oxford Dictionary of National Biography(online ed.). Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10540.Retrieved29 October2008.(Subscription orUK public library membershiprequired.)(Subscription required).
  9. ^Sedgwick, pp. ix–x.
  10. ^"No. 9050".The London Gazette.16 April 1751. p. 1.
  11. ^Hibbert, pp. 3–15.
  12. ^Brooke, pp. 51–52; Hibbert, pp. 24–25.
  13. ^Bullion, John L. (2004)."Augusta, princess of Wales (1719–1772)".Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/46829.Retrieved 17 September 2008 (Subscription required): "George III adopted the moral standards she tried to teach."
  14. ^Ayling, p. 33.
  15. ^Ayling, p. 54; Brooke, pp. 71–72.
  16. ^Ayling, pp. 36–37; Brooke, p. 49; Hibbert, p. 31.
  17. ^Benjamin, p. 62.
  18. ^Hadlow, Janice(2014).A royal experiment: the private life of King George III.New York: Holt. pp. 139–148.ISBN978-0805096569.
  19. ^"Documents relating to the case".The National Archives.Retrieved14 October2008.
  20. ^Ayling, pp. 85–87.
  21. ^Ayling, p. 378; Cannon and Griffiths, p. 518.
  22. ^Watson, p. 549.
  23. ^Brooke, p. 391: "There can be no doubt that the King wrote 'Britain'."
  24. ^Brooke, p. 88; Simms and Riotte, p. 58.
  25. ^Baer,George III (1738–1820),22 December 2021
  26. ^Butterfield, pp. 22, 115–117, 129–130.
  27. ^Hibbert, p. 86; Watson, pp. 67–79.
  28. ^"Our history".The Crown Estate.2004. Archived fromthe originalon 13 November 2017.Retrieved7 November2017.
  29. ^Kelso, Paul (6 March 2000)."The royal family and the public purse".The Guardian.Retrieved4 April2015.
  30. ^Watson, p. 88; this view is also shared by Brooke (see for example p. 99).
  31. ^Medley, p. 501.
  32. ^Ayling, p. 194; Brooke, pp. xv, 214, 301.
  33. ^Brooke, p. 215.
  34. ^Ayling, p. 195.
  35. ^Ayling, pp. 196–198.
  36. ^Brooke, p. 145; Carretta, pp. 59, 64 ff.; Watson, p. 93.
  37. ^Brooke, pp. 146–147.
  38. ^Willcox & Arnstein (1988), pp. 131–132.
  39. ^Chernow, p. 137.
  40. ^Watson, pp. 183–184.
  41. ^Cannon and Griffiths, p. 505; Hibbert, p. 122.
  42. ^Cannon and Griffiths, p. 505.
  43. ^Black, p. 82.
  44. ^Watson, pp. 184–185.
  45. ^Ayling, pp. 122–133; Hibbert, pp. 107–109; Watson, pp. 106–111.
  46. ^Ayling, pp. 122–133; Hibbert, pp. 111–113.
  47. ^Ayling, p. 137; Hibbert, p. 124.
  48. ^Ayling, pp. 154–160; Brooke, pp. 147–151.
  49. ^Ayling, pp. 167–168; Hibbert, p. 140.
  50. ^Brooke, p. 260; Fraser, p. 277.
  51. ^abBrooke, pp. 272–282; Cannon and Griffiths, p. 498.
  52. ^Hibbert, p. 141.
  53. ^Hibbert, p. 143.
  54. ^Watson, p. 197.
  55. ^Thomas, p. 31.
  56. ^Ayling, p. 121.
  57. ^Taylor (2016), pp. 91–100
  58. ^Chernow, pp. 214–215.
  59. ^Carretta, pp. 97–98, 367.
  60. ^O'Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson (2014).The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire.pp. 158–164.
  61. ^Willcox & Arnstein (1988), p. 162.
  62. ^O'Shaughnessy, ch 1.
  63. ^Trevelyan, vol. 1 p. 4.
  64. ^Trevelyan, vol. 1 p. 5.
  65. ^abCannon and Griffiths, pp. 510–511.
  66. ^Brooke, p. 183.
  67. ^Brooke, pp. 180–182, 192, 223.
  68. ^Hibbert, pp. 156–157.
  69. ^Willcox & Arnstein, p. 157.
  70. ^abcWillcox & Arnstein, pp. 161, 165.
  71. ^Stein, Stanley; Stein, Barbara (2003).Apogee of Empire: Spain and New Spain in the Age of Charles III, 1759–1789.Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 338–340.ISBN978-0801873393.
  72. ^Ayling, pp. 275–276.
  73. ^Taylor (2016), p. 287
  74. ^Taylor (2016), p. 290
  75. ^Ayling, p. 284.
  76. ^The Oxford Illustrated History of the British Army(1994) p. 129.
  77. ^Brooke, p. 221.
  78. ^U.S. Department of State,Treaty of Paris, 1783.Retrieved 5 July 2013.
  79. ^Bullion,George III on Empire, 1783,p. 306.
  80. ^Roos, Dave (7 October 2021)."Famous Loyalists of the Revolutionary War Era".history.com.Retrieved19 April2022.
  81. ^Adams, C.F., ed. (1850–1856).The works of John Adams, second president of the United States.Vol. VIII. pp. 255–257,quoted in Ayling, p. 323 and Hibbert, p. 165.
  82. ^e.g. Ayling, p. 281.
  83. ^Hibbert, p. 243; Pares, p. 120.
  84. ^Brooke, pp. 250–251.
  85. ^Watson, pp. 272–279.
  86. ^Brooke, p. 316; Carretta, pp. 262, 297.
  87. ^Brooke, p. 259.
  88. ^Ayling, p. 218.
  89. ^Ayling, p. 220.
  90. ^Ayling, pp. 222–230, 366–376.
  91. ^Macalpine, Ida; Hunter, Richard (1966)."The" Insanity "of King George III: a Classic Case of Porphyria".British Medical Journal.21(1): 65–71.doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5479.65.PMC1843211.PMID5323262.
  92. ^Robb-Smith, A.H.T. (1970)."George III and the Mad-Business by Ida Macalpine, Richard Hunter: Review".The English Historical Review.85(333): 808–810.JSTOR563552.
  93. ^Röhl, Warren, and Hunt.
  94. ^Cox, Timothy M.; Jack, N.; Lofthouse, S.; Watling, J.; Haines, J.; Warren, M. J. (2005). "King George III and porphyria: an elemental hypothesis and investigation".The Lancet.366(9482): 332–335.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66991-7.PMID16039338.S2CID13109527.
  95. ^Peters, Timothy J.; Wilkinson, D. (2010). "King George III and porphyria: a clinical re-examination of the historical evidence".History of Psychiatry.21(1): 3–19.doi:10.1177/0957154X09102616.PMID21877427.S2CID22391207.
  96. ^Peters, T. (June 2011)."King George III, bipolar disorder, porphyria and lessons for historians".Clinical Medicine.11(3): 261–264.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.11-3-261.PMC4953321.PMID21902081.
  97. ^Rentoumi, V.; Peters, T.; Conlin, J.; Garrard, P. (2017)."The acute mania of King George III: A computational linguistic analysis".PLOS One.3(12): e0171626.Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1271626R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171626.PMC5362044.PMID28328964.
  98. ^Roberts, pp. 677–680
  99. ^"Parishes: Hartlebury Pages 380–387 A History of the County of Worcester: Volume 3".British History Online.Victoria County History, 1918.Retrieved10 June2023.
  100. ^"Parishes: Callington – St Columb Pages 51–67 Magna Britannia: Volume 3, Cornwall".British History Online.Cadell & Davies, London 1814.Retrieved10 June2023.
  101. ^"Was George III a manic depressive?".BBC News.15 April 2013.Retrieved23 July2018.
  102. ^Ayling, pp. 329–335; Brooke, pp. 322–328; Fraser, pp. 281–282; Hibbert, pp. 262–267.
  103. ^Ayling, pp. 334–343; Brooke, p. 332; Fraser, p. 282.
  104. ^Ayling, pp. 338–342; Hibbert, p. 273.
  105. ^Ayling, p. 345.
  106. ^Ayling, pp. 349–350; Carretta, p. 285; Fraser, p. 282; Hibbert, pp. 301–302; Watson, p. 323.
  107. ^Carretta, p. 275.
  108. ^Ayling, pp. 181–182; Fraser, p. 282.
  109. ^Thompson, E. P.(1966).The Making of the English Working Class.New York: Vintage Books. p. 144.ISBN0-394-70322-7.
  110. ^Ayling, pp. 395–396; Watson, pp. 360–377.
  111. ^Ayling, pp. 408–409.
  112. ^abWeir, p. 286.
  113. ^Ayling, p. 411.
  114. ^Hibbert, p. 313.
  115. ^Ayling, p. 414; Brooke, p. 374; Hibbert, p. 315.
  116. ^Watson, pp. 402–409.
  117. ^Ayling, p. 423.
  118. ^Colley, p. 225.
  119. ^The Times,27 October 1803, p. 2.
  120. ^Brooke, p. 597.
  121. ^Letter of 30 November 1803, quoted in Wheeler and Broadley, p. xiii.
  122. ^"Nelson, Trafalgar, and those who served".National Archives.Retrieved31 October2009.
  123. ^ab"Reasons for the success of the abolitionist campaign in 1807".BBC.Retrieved25 October2019.
  124. ^Pares, p. 139.
  125. ^Ayling, pp. 441–442.
  126. ^Brooke, p. 381; Carretta, p. 340.
  127. ^Hibbert, p. 396.
  128. ^Hibbert, p. 394.
  129. ^Brooke, p. 383; Hibbert, pp. 397–398.
  130. ^Fraser, p. 285; Hibbert, pp. 399–402.
  131. ^Ayling, pp. 453–455; Brooke, pp. 384–385; Hibbert, p. 405.
  132. ^Hibbert, p. 408.
  133. ^abBlack, p. 410.
  134. ^Letter from Duke of York to George IV, quoted in Brooke, p. 386.
  135. ^"Royal Burials in the Chapel since 1805".St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle.Dean and Canons of Windsor.Retrieved7 November2017.
  136. ^Brooke, p. 387.
  137. ^Why Andrew Roberts Wants Us to Reconsider King George III,Isaac Chotiner,The New Yorker,9 November 2021, accessed 5 December 2021
  138. ^Newman, Brooke (28 July 2020)."Throne of Blood".slate.com.Slate.Retrieved21 August2021.
  139. ^Rodriguez, Junius P.(2015).Encyclopedia of Emancipation and Abolition in the Transatlantic World.Routledge.ISBN978-1317471806– viaGoogle Books.
  140. ^Ditchfield, G. (2002).George III: An Essay in Monarchy.Springer.ISBN978-0230599437– via Google Books.
  141. ^Klein, Christopher (13 February 2020)."The Ex-Slaves Who Fought with the British".History.Retrieved22 August2021.
  142. ^"Transatlantic slave trade and abolition".Royal Museums Greenwich.2021.Retrieved14 September2021.
  143. ^Carretta, pp. 92–93, 267–273, 302–305, 317.
  144. ^Watson, pp. 10–11.
  145. ^Brooke, p. 90.
  146. ^Carretta, pp. 99–101, 123–126.
  147. ^Ayling, p. 247.
  148. ^Reitan, p. viii.
  149. ^Reitan, pp. xii–xiii.
  150. ^Macalpine, Ida; Hunter, Richard A. (1991) [1969].George III and the Mad-Business.Pimlico.ISBN978-0-7126-5279-7
  151. ^Butterfield, p. 152.
  152. ^Brooke, pp. 175–176.
  153. ^The London Gazetteconsistently refers to the young prince as "His Royal Highness Prince George""No. 8734".The London Gazette.5 April 1748. p. 3."No. 8735".The London Gazette.9 April 1748. p. 2."No. 8860".The London Gazette.20 June 1749. p. 2."No. 8898".The London Gazette.31 October 1749. p. 3."No. 8902".The London Gazette.17 November 1749. p. 3."No. 8963".The London Gazette.16 June 1750. p. 1."No. 8971".The London Gazette.14 July 1750. p. 1.
  154. ^abBrooke, p. 390.
  155. ^Marquardt, Bernd (2018).Universalgeschichte des Staates: von der vorstaatlichen Gesellschaft zum Staat der Industriegesellschaft.LIT Verlag Münster.ISBN978-3643900043– via Google Books.
  156. ^Shaw, Wm. A. (1906)The Knights of England,I,London,p. 44.
  157. ^Shaw,p. ix.
  158. ^Velde, François (5 August 2013)."Marks of Cadency in the British Royal Family".Heraldica.Retrieved25 December2021.
  159. ^See, for example,Berry, William(1810).An introduction to heraldry containing the rudiments of the science.pp. 110–111.
  160. ^Pinches, John Harvey; Pinches, Rosemary (1974).The Royal Heraldry of England.Heraldry Today. Slough, Buckinghamshire: Hollen Street Press. pp. 215–216.ISBN978-0-900455-25-4.
  161. ^"No. 15324".The London Gazette.30 December 1800. p. 2.
  162. ^"No. 17149".The London Gazette.29 June 1816. p. 1.
  163. ^Kiste, John Van der (19 January 2004).George III's Children.The History Press. p. 205.ISBN9780750953825.
  164. ^Genealogie ascendante jusqu'au quatrieme degre inclusivement de tous les Rois et Princes de maisons souveraines de l'Europe actuellement vivans[Genealogy up to the fourth degree inclusive of all the Kings and Princes of sovereign houses of Europe currently living] (in French). Bourdeaux: Frederic Guillaume Birnstiel. 1768. p. 4.

Bibliography

Further reading

George III
Cadet branch of theHouse of Welf
Born:4 June 1738Died:29 January 1820
Regnal titles
Preceded by King of Great BritainandIreland
25 October 1760 – 31 December 1800
Acts of Union 1800
Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg
25 October 1760 – 12 October 1814
Congress of Vienna
Acts of Union 1800 King of the United Kingdom
1 January 1801 – 29 January 1820
Succeeded by
Congress of Vienna King of Hanover
12 October 1814 – 29 January 1820
British royalty
Preceded by Prince of Wales
1751–1760
Vacant
Title next held by
George (IV)
Peerage of Great Britain
Preceded by Duke of Edinburgh
1st creation
1751–1760
Merged with the Crown
Titles in pretence
Preceded by — TITULAR —
King of France
25 October 1760 – 31 December 1800
Title abandoned