Greenhouse gas emissions

Greenhouse gas(GHG)emissionsfrom human activities intensify thegreenhouse effect.This contributes toclimate change.Carbon dioxide(CO2), from burningfossil fuelssuch ascoal,oil,andnatural gas,is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. Thelargest emittersare China followed by the United States. The United States hashigher emissions per capita.The main producers fueling the emissions globally arelarge oil and gas companies.Emissions from human activities have increasedatmospheric carbon dioxideby about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among allgreenhouse gases.Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before.[2]Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2022 were 703GtC(2575GtCO2), of which 484±20GtC(1773±73GtCO2) fromfossil fuelsand industry, and 219±60GtC(802±220GtCO2) fromland use change.Land-use change,such as deforestation,caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2022,coal32%, oil 24%, and gas 10%.[3][4]

Annual carbon dioxide emissions per person (height of vertical bars) and per country (area of vertical bars) of the fifteen high-emitting countries[1]

Carbon dioxide(CO2) is the main greenhouse gas resulting from human activities. It accounts for more than half of warming.Methane(CH4) emissions have almost the same short-term impact.[5]Nitrous oxide(N2O) andfluorinated gases(F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison. Emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in 2023 were all higher than ever before.[6]

Electricity generation,heat andtransportare major emitters; overall energy is responsible for around 73% of emissions.[7]Deforestationand other changes in land use also emit carbon dioxide andmethane.The largest source of anthropogenicmethane emissionsisagriculture,closely followed bygas ventingandfugitive emissionsfrom thefossil-fuel industry.The largest agricultural methane source islivestock.Agricultural soilsemitnitrous oxidepartly due tofertilizers.Similarly,fluorinated gasesfromrefrigerantsplay an outsized role in total human emissions.

The current CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[8]are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[9][10]required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[11]Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[12]

Thecarbon footprint(orgreenhouse gas footprint) serves as an indicator to compare the amount of greenhouse gases emitted over the entirelife cyclefrom the production of a good or service along thesupply chainto its final consumption.[13][14]Carbon accounting(or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how muchgreenhouse gasan organization emits.[15]

Relevance for greenhouse effect and global warming

edit

Thegreenhouse effectoccurs whengreenhouse gasesin a planet's atmosphere insulate the planet from losing heat to space, raising its surface temperature. Surface heating can happen from an internal heat source as in the case ofJupiter,or from its host star as in the case of theEarth.In the case of Earth, the Sun emitsshortwave radiation(sunlight) that passes through greenhouse gases to heat the Earth's surface. In response, the Earth's surface emitslongwave radiationthat is mostlyabsorbedby greenhouse gases. The absorption of longwave radiation prevents it from reaching space, reducing the rate at which the Earth can cool off.

Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be about −18 °C (−0.4 °F),[16][17]which is less than Earth's 20th century average of about 14 °C (57 °F), or a more recent average of about 15 °C (59 °F).[18][19]In addition to naturally present greenhouse gases, burning offossil fuelshas increased amounts ofcarbon dioxideandmethanein the atmosphere.[20][21]As a result,global warmingof about 1.2 °C (2.2 °F) has occurred since theIndustrial Revolution,[22]with the global average surface temperature increasing at a rate of 0.18 °C (0.32 °F) per decade since 1981.[23]

Overview of main sources

edit
Global greenhouse gas emissions by type of greenhouse gas.[24]The majority (74%) is CO2,followed by methane (17%), in 2016.

Relevant greenhouse gases

edit

The major anthropogenic (human origin) sources of greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N
2
O
), methane, three groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride(SF
6
),hydrofluorocarbons(HFCs) andperfluorocarbons(PFCs, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)).[25]Though thegreenhouse effectis heavily driven bywater vapor,[26]human emissions of water vapor are not a significant contributor to warming.

AlthoughCFCsare greenhouse gases, they are regulated by theMontreal Protocolwhich was motivated by CFCs' contribution toozone depletionrather than by their contribution to global warming. Ozone depletion has only a minor role in greenhouse warming, though the two processes are sometimes confused in the media. In 2016, negotiators from over 170 nations meeting at the summit of theUnited Nations Environment Programmereached a legally binding accord to phase outhydrofluorocarbons(HFCs) in theKigali Amendmentto theMontreal Protocol.[27][28][29]The use of CFC-12 (except some essential uses) has been phased out due to itsozone depletingproperties.[30]The phasing-out of less activeHCFC-compoundswill be completed in 2030.[31]

Human activities

edit
The industrial era growth in atmospheric CO2-equivalent gas concentrations since 1750[32]

Starting about 1750, industrial activity powered by fossil fuels began to significantly increase the concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Emissions have grown rapidly since about 1950 with ongoing expansions in global population and economic activity following World War II. As of 2021, measured atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were almost 50% higher than pre-industrial levels.[32][33]

The main sources of greenhouse gases due to human activity (also calledcarbon sources) are:

Global estimates

edit

Global greenhouse gas emissions are about 50 Gt per year[24]and for 2019 have been estimated at 57 Gt CO2eq including 5 Gt due to land use change.[43]In 2019, approximately 34% [20 GtCO2-eq] of total net anthropogenic GHG emissions came from the energy supply sector, 24% [14 GtCO2-eq] from industry, 22% [13 GtCO2-eq]from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), 15% [8.7 GtCO2-eq] from transport and 6% [3.3 GtCO2-eq] from buildings.[44]

The current CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[8]are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[9][10]required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[11]

While cities are sometimes considered to be disproportionate contributors to emissions, per-capita emissions tend to be lower for cities than the averages in their countries.[45]

A 2017 survey of corporations responsible for global emissions found that100 companies were responsible for 71% of global direct and indirect emissions,and that state-owned companies were responsible for 59% of their emissions.[46][47]

China is, by a significant margin, Asia's and the world's largest emitter: it emits nearly 10 billion tonnes each year, more than one-quarter of global emissions.[48]Other countries with fast growing emissions areSouth Korea,Iran, and Australia (which apart from the oil rich Persian Gulf states, now has the highest per capita emission rate in the world). On the other hand, annual per capita emissions of the EU-15 and the US are gradually decreasing over time.[49]Emissions in Russia and Ukraine have decreased fastest since 1990 due to economic restructuring in these countries.[50]

2015 was the first year to see both total global economic growth and a reduction of carbon emissions.[51]

High income countries compared to low income countries

edit
CO2emissions per capita versusGDPper capita (2018): In general, countries with a higher GDP per capita also have higher greenhouse gas emissions per capita.[52]

Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[12]: 144 Due to China's fast economic development, its annual per capita emissions are quickly approaching the levels of those in theAnnex I groupof the Kyoto Protocol (i.e., the developed countries excluding the US).[49]

Africa and South America are both fairly small emitters, accounting for 3-4% of global emissions each. Both have emissions almost equal to international aviation and shipping.[48]

Calculations and reporting

edit
Per capitaCO2emissions surged after the mid-20th century, but then slowed their rate of growth.[53]

Variables

edit

There are several ways of measuring greenhouse gas emissions. Some variables that have been reported include:[54]

  • Definition of measurement boundaries: Emissions can be attributed geographically, to the area where they were emitted (the territory principle) or by the activity principle to the territory that produced the emissions. These two principles result in different totals when measuring, for example, electricity importation from one country to another, or emissions at an international airport.
  • Time horizon of different gases: The contribution of given greenhouse gas is reported as a CO2equivalent. The calculation to determine this takes into account how long that gas remains in the atmosphere. This is not always known accurately[clarification needed]and calculations must be regularly updated to reflect new information.
  • The measurement protocol itself: This may be via direct measurement or estimation. The four main methods are the emission factor-based method, mass balance method, predictiveemissions monitoringsystems, andcontinuous emissions monitoring systems.These methods differ in accuracy, cost, and usability. Public information fromspace-based measurements of carbon dioxidebyClimate Traceis expected to reveal individual large plants before the2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference.[55]

These measures are sometimes used by countries to assert various policy/ethical positions on climate change.[56]: 94 The use of different measures leads to a lack of comparability, which is problematic when monitoring progress towards targets. There are arguments for the adoption of a common measurement tool, or at least the development of communication between different tools.[54]

Reporting

edit

Emissions may be tracked over long time periods, known as historical or cumulative emissions measurements. Cumulative emissions provide some indicators of what is responsible for greenhouse gas atmospheric concentration build-up.[57]: 199 

National accounts balance

edit

The national accounts balance tracks emissions based on the difference between a country's exports and imports. For many richer nations, the balance is negative because more goods are imported than they are exported. This result is mostly due to the fact that it is cheaper to produce goods outside of developed countries, leading developed countries to become increasingly dependent on services and not goods. A positive account balance would mean that more production was occurring within a country, so more operational factories would increase carbon emission levels.[58]

Emissions may also be measured across shorter time periods. Emissions changes may, for example, be measured against the base year of 1990. 1990 was used in theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC) as the base year for emissions, and is also used in theKyoto Protocol(some gases are also measured from the year 1995).[12]: 146, 149 A country's emissions may also be reported as a proportion of global emissions for a particular year.

Another measurement is of per capita emissions. This divides a country's total annual emissions by its mid-year population.[59]: 370 Per capita emissions may be based on historical or annual emissions.[56]: 106–107 

Embedded emissions

edit

One way of attributing greenhouse gas emissions is to measure theembedded emissions(also referred to as "embodied emissions" ) of goods that are being consumed. Emissions are usually measured according to production, rather than consumption.[60]For example, in the main internationaltreatyon climate change (theUNFCCC), countries report on emissions produced within their borders, e.g., the emissions produced from burning fossil fuels.[61]: 179 [62]: 1 Under a production-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the exporting, rather than the importing, country. Under a consumption-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the importing country, rather than the exporting, country.

A substantial proportion of CO2emissions is traded internationally. The net effect of trade was to export emissions from China and other emerging markets to consumers in the US, Japan, and Western Europe.[62]: 4 

Carbon footprint

edit
Acarbon footprint(or greenhouse gas footprint) is a calculated value or index that makes it possible to compare the total amount ofgreenhouse gasesthat an activity, product, company or country adds to the atmosphere. Carbon footprints are usually reported in tonnes of emissions (CO2-equivalent) per unit of comparison. Such units can be for exampletonnes CO2-eq per year,per kilogram of protein for consumption,per kilometer travelled,per piece of clothingand so forth. A product's carbon footprint includes the emissions for the entirelife cycle.These run from the production along thesupply chainto its final consumption and disposal.

Emission intensity

edit

Emission intensity is a ratio between greenhouse gas emissions and another metric, e.g., gross domestic product (GDP) or energy use. The terms "carbon intensity" and "emissions intensity"are also sometimes used.[63]Emission intensities may be calculated usingmarket exchange rates(MER) orpurchasing power parity(PPP).[56]: 96 Calculations based on MER show large differences in intensities between developed and developing countries, whereas calculations based on PPP show smaller differences.

Example tools and websites

edit

Carbon accounting(or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[15]

Climate TRACE

edit
Climate TRACE(Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions)[64]is an independent group which monitors and publishes greenhouse gas emissions.[65]It launched in 2021 beforeCOP26,[66]and improvesmonitoring, reporting and verification (MRV)of bothcarbon dioxideandmethane.[67][68]The group monitors sources such ascoal minesandpower station smokestacksworldwide,[69]with satellite data(but not their own satellites) andartificial intelligence.[70][71]
edit

Cumulative and historical emissions

edit
Cumulative and annual CO2emissions
Cumulatively, the U.S. has emitted the greatest amount of CO2,though China's emission trend is now steeper.[53]
Annually, the U.S. emitted the most CO2until early in the 21st century, when China's annual emissions began to dominate.[53]
Cumulative CO2emission by world region
Cumulative per person emissions by world region in 3 time periods
CO2emissions by source since 1880

Cumulative anthropogenic (i.e., human-emitted) emissions of CO2from fossil fuel use are a major cause ofglobal warming,[72]and give some indication of which countries have contributed most to human-induced climate change. In particular, CO2stays in the atmosphere for at least 150 years and up to 1000 years,[73]whilst methane disappears within a decade or so,[74]and nitrous oxides last about 100 years.[75]The graph gives some indication of which regions have contributed most to human-induced climate change.[76][77]: 15 When these numbers are calculated per capita cumulative emissions based on then-current population the situation is shown even more clearly. The ratio in per capita emissions between industrialized countries and developing countries was estimated at more than 10 to 1.

Non-OECDcountries accounted for 42% of cumulative energy-related CO2emissions between 1890 and 2007.[61]: 179–80 Over this time period, the US accounted for 28% of emissions; the EU, 23%; Japan, 4%; other OECD countries 5%; Russia, 11%; China, 9%; India, 3%; and the rest of the world, 18%.[61]: 179–80 .The European Commission adopted a set of legislative proposals targeting a reduction of the CO2 emissions by 55% by 2030.

Overall, developed countries accounted for 83.8% of industrial CO2emissions over this time period, and 67.8% of total CO2emissions. Developing countries accounted for industrial CO2emissions of 16.2% over this time period, and 32.2% of total CO2emissions.

However, what becomes clear when we look at emissions across the world today is that the countries with the highest emissions over history are not always the biggest emitters today. For example, in 2017, the UK accounted for just 1% of global emissions.[48]

In comparison, humans have emitted more greenhouse gases than theChicxulub meteorite impact eventwhich caused theextinction of the dinosaurs.[78]

Transport, together withelectricity generation,is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions in theEU.Greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector continue to rise, in contrast to power generation and nearly all other sectors. Since 1990, transportation emissions have increased by 30%. The transportation sector accounts for around 70% of these emissions. The majority of these emissions are caused by passengervehiclesand vans. Road travel is the first major source of greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, followed by aircraft and maritime.[79][80]Waterborne transportation is still the leastcarbon-intensivemode of transportation on average, and it is an essential link insustainablemultimodal freight supply chains.[81]

Buildings, like industry, are directly responsible for around one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions, primarily fromspace heatingand hot water consumption. When combined with power consumption within buildings, this figure climbs to more than one-third.[82][83][84]

Within the EU, theagricultural sectorpresently accounts for roughly 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions, with methane from livestock accounting for slightly more than half of 10%.[85]

Estimates of total CO2emissions do includebioticcarbon emissions, mainly from deforestation.[56]: 94 Including biotic emissions brings about the same controversy mentioned earlier regarding carbon sinks and land-use change.[56]: 93–94 The actual calculation of net emissions is very complex, and is affected by how carbon sinks are allocated between regions and the dynamics of theclimate system.

Fossil fuel CO2emissions on log (natural and base 10) scales

The graphic shows the logarithm of 1850–2019 fossil fuel CO2emissions;[86]natural log on left, actual value of Gigatons per year on right. Although emissions increased during the 170-year period by about 3% per year overall, intervals of distinctly different growth rates (broken at 1913, 1945, and 1973) can be detected. The regression lines suggest that emissions can rapidly shift from one growth regime to another and then persist for long periods of time. The most recent drop in emissions growth - by almost 3 percentage points - was at about the time of the1970s energy crisis.Percent changes per year were estimated by piecewise linear regression on the log data and are shown on the plot; the data are from The Integrated Carbon Observation system.[87]

Changes since a particular base year

edit

The sharp acceleration in CO2emissions since 2000 to more than a 3% increase per year (more than 2 ppm per year) from 1.1% per year during the 1990s is attributable to the lapse of formerly declining trends incarbon intensityof both developing and developed nations. China was responsible for most of global growth in emissions during this period. Localised plummeting emissions associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union have been followed by slow emissions growth in this region due to moreefficient energy use,made necessary by the increasing proportion of it that is exported.[88]In comparison, methane has not increased appreciably, andN
2
O
by 0.25% y−1.

Using different base years for measuring emissions has an effect on estimates of national contributions to global warming.[77]: 17–18 [89]This can be calculated by dividing a country's highest contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year, by that country's minimum contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year. Choosing between base years of 1750, 1900, 1950, and 1990 has a significant effect for most countries.[77]: 17–18 Within theG8group of countries, it is most significant for the UK, France and Germany. These countries have a long history of CO2emissions (see the section onCumulative and historical emissions).

Data from Global Carbon Project

edit
Map of key fossil fuel projects ( "carbon bombs" ): proposed or existing fossil fuel extraction projects (a coal mine, oil or gas project) that would result in more than 1 gigaton of CO2emissions if its reserves were completely extracted and burnt.[90]

TheGlobal Carbon Projectcontinuously releases data about CO2emissions, budget and concentration.

CO2emissions[91]
Year Fossil fuels

and industry (excluding cement carbonation) Gt C

Land use

change Gt C

Total

Gt C

Total

Gt CO2

2010 9.106 1.32 10.43 38.0
2011 9.412 1.35 10.76 39.2
2012 9.554 1.32 10.87 39.6
2013 9.640 1.26 10.9 39.7
2014 9.710 1.34 11.05 40.2
2015 9.704 1.47 11.17 40.7
2016 9.695 1.24 10.93 39.8
2017 9.852 1.18 11.03 40.2
2018 10.051 1.14 11.19 40.7
2019 10.120 1.24 11.36 41.3
2020 9.624 1.11 10.73 39.1
2021 10.132 1.08 11.21 40.8
2022

(projection)

10.2 1.08 11.28 41.3

Emissions by type of greenhouse gas

edit

GHG emissions 2020 by gas type
without land-use change
using 100 year GWP
Total: 49.8 GtCO2e[92]: 5 

CO2mostly by fossil fuel (72%)
CH4methane (19%)
N
2
O
nitrous oxide (6%)
Fluorinated gases (3%)

CO2emissions by fuel type (as of 2023)[86]

coal (41%)
oil (32%)
gas (21%)
cement (4%)
others (2%)

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the dominant emitted greenhouse gas, while methane (CH4) emissions almost have the same short-term impact.[5]Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured inCO2equivalentsdetermined by theirglobal warming potential(GWP), which depends on their lifetime in the atmosphere. Estimations largely depend on the ability of oceans and land sinks to absorb these gases.Short-lived climate pollutants(SLCPs) including methane,hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),tropospheric ozoneandblack carbonpersist in the atmosphere for a period ranging from days to 15 years; whereas carbon dioxide can remain in the atmosphere for millennia.[93]Reducing SLCP emissions can cut the ongoing rate of global warming by almost half and reduce the projectedArctic warmingby two-thirds.[94]

Greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were estimated at 57.4 GtCO2e, while CO2emissions alone made up 42.5 Gt including land-use change (LUC).[95]

While mitigation measures fordecarbonizationare essential on the longer term, they could result in weak near-term warming because sources of carbon emissions often also co-emit air pollution. Hence, pairing measures that target carbon dioxide with measures targeting non-CO2pollutants – short-lived climate pollutants, which have faster effects on the climate, is essential for climate goals.[96]

Carbon dioxide (CO2)

edit
  • Fossil fuel (use for energy generation, transport, heating and machinery in industrial plants):oil,gasandcoal(89%) are the major driver of anthropogenic global warming with annual emissions of 35.6 GtCO2in 2019.[97]: 20 
  • Cementproduction (burning of fossil fuels) (4%) is estimated at 1.42 GtCO2
  • Land-use change (LUC) is the imbalance ofdeforestationandreforestation.Estimations are very uncertain at 4.5 GtCO2.Wildfiresalone cause annual emissions of about 7 GtCO2[98][99]
  • Non-energy use of fuels, carbon losses in coke ovens, andflaringin crude oil production.[97]
  • Production of Hydrogen (using and transforming of Methane and Coal): Not yet estimated, emerging.

Methane (CH4)

edit
Historical and future temperature projections showing importance of mitigating short-lived climate pollutants like methane

Methane has a high immediate impact with a 5-year global warming potential of up to 100.[5]Given this, the current 389 Mt of methane emissions[97]: 6 has about the same short-term global warming effect as CO2emissions, with a risk to trigger irreversible changes in climate and ecosystems. For methane, a reduction of about 30% below current emission levels would lead to a stabilization in its atmospheric concentration.

  • Fossil fuels (32%) (emissions due to losses during production and transport) account for most of the methane emissions including coal mining (12% of methane total), gas distribution and leakages (11%) as well as gas venting in oil production (9%).[97]: 6 [97]: 12 
  • Livestock (28%) with cattle (21%) as the dominant source, followed by buffalo (3%), sheep (2%), and goats (1.5%).[97]: 6, 23 
  • Human waste and wastewater (21%): When biomass waste in landfills and organic substances in domestic andindustrial wastewateris decomposed by bacteria in anaerobic conditions, substantial amounts of methane are generated.[97]: 12 
  • Rice cultivation (10%) on flooded rice fields is another agricultural source, whereanaerobic decompositionof organic material produces methane.[97]: 12 

Nitrous oxide (N
2
O
)

edit

N2O has a high GWP and significant Ozone Depleting Potential. It is estimated that the global warming potential of N2O over 100 years is 265 times greater than CO2.[100]For N2O, a reduction of more than 50% would be required for a stabilization.

Most emissions (56%) of nitrous oxide comes from agriculture, especially meat production: cattle (droppings on pasture), fertilizers, animal manure.[97]: 12 Further contributions come from combustion of fossil fuels (18%) andbiofuels[101]as well as industrial production ofadipic acidandnitric acid.

F-gases

edit

Fluorinated gases includehydrofluorocarbons(HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC),sulfur hexafluoride(SF6), andnitrogen trifluoride(NF3). They are used by switchgear in the power sector, semiconductor manufacture, aluminum production and a largely unknown source of SF6.[97]: 38 Continued phase down of manufacture and use of HFCs under theKigali Amendmentto the Montreal Protocol will help reduce HFC emissions and concurrently improve the energy efficiency of appliances that use HFCs like air conditioners, freezers and other refrigeration devices.

Hydrogen

edit

Hydrogenleakages contribute to indirect global warming.[102] When hydrogen is oxidized in the atmosphere, the result is an increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in both the troposphere and the stratosphere.[103]Hydrogen can leak fromhydrogen productionfacilities as well as any infrastructure in which hydrogen is transported, stored, or consumed.[104]

Black carbon

edit

Black carbonis formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels,biofuel,andbiomass.It is not a greenhouse gas but aclimate forcingagent. Black carbon can absorb sunlight and reducealbedowhen deposited on snow and ice. Indirect heating can be caused by the interaction with clouds.[105]Black carbon stays in the atmosphere for only several days to weeks.[106]Emissions may be mitigated by upgrading coke ovens, installing particulate filters on diesel-based engines, reducingroutine flaring,and minimizing open burning of biomass.

Emissions by sector

edit
Contributions to climate change broken down by economic sector as of 2019
2016 global greenhouse gas emissions by sector.[107]Percentages are calculated from estimated global emissions of all Kyoto Greenhouse Gases, converted to CO2equivalent quantities (GtCO2e).

Global greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to differentsectors of the economy.This provides a picture of the varying contributions of different types of economic activity to climate change, and helps in understanding the changes required tomitigate climate change.

Greenhouse gas emissions can be divided into those that arise from the combustion of fuels to produce energy, and those generated by other processes. Around two thirds of greenhouse gas emissions arise from the combustion of fuels.[108]

Energy may be produced at the point ofconsumption,or by a generator for consumption by others. Thus emissions arising from energy production may be categorized according to where they are emitted, or where the resulting energy is consumed. If emissions are attributed at the point of production, then electricity generators contribute about 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[109]If these emissions are attributed to the final consumer then 24% of total emissions arise from manufacturing and construction, 17% from transportation, 11% from domestic consumers, and 7% from commercial consumers.[110]Around 4% of emissions arise from the energy consumed by the energy and fuel industry itself.

The remaining third of emissions arise from processes other than energy production. 12% of total emissions arise from agriculture, 7% from land use change and forestry, 6% from industrial processes, and 3% from waste.[108]

Electricity generation

edit
Global greenhouse gas emissions by gas

Coal-fired power stationsare the single largest emitter, with over 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2018.[111]Although much less polluting than coal plants, naturalgas-fired power plantsare also major emitters,[112]taking electricity generation as a whole over 25% in 2018.[113]Notably, just 5% of the world's power plants account for almost three-quarters of carbon emissions from electricity generation, based on an inventory of more than 29,000 fossil-fuel power plants across 221 countries.[114]In the 2022 IPCC report, it is noted that providing modern energy services universally would only increase greenhouse gas emissions by a few percent at most. This slight increase means that the additional energy demand that comes from supporting decent living standards for all would be far lower than current average energy consumption.[115]

Agriculture, forestry and land use

edit

Agriculture

edit

The amount ofgreenhouse gas emissions from agricultureis significant: The agriculture, forestry and land use sector contribute between 13% and 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[116]Emissions come fromdirectgreenhouse gas emissions (for example fromrice productionandlivestockfarming).[117]and fromindirectemissions. With regards to direct emissions,nitrous oxideandmethanemake up over half of total greenhouse gas emission from agriculture.[118]Indirect emissions on the other hand come from the conversion of non-agricultural land such asforestsinto agricultural land.[119][120]Furthermore, there is alsofossil fuelconsumption for transport andfertilizerproduction. For example, themanufactureand use ofnitrogen fertilizercontributes around 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions.[121]Livestock farmingis a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.[122]At the same time,livestock farming is affected by climate change.

Farm animals' digestive systems can be put into two categories:monogastricandruminant.Ruminant cattle for beef and dairy rank high in greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison, monogastric, or pigs and poultry-related foods, are lower. The consumption of the monogastric types may yield less emissions. Monogastric animals have a higher feed-conversion efficiency, and also do not produce as much methane.[123]Non-ruminant livestock, such as poultry, emit far fewer greenhouse gases.[124]

There are many strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (this is one of the goals ofclimate-smart agriculture). Mitigation measures in the food system can be divided into four categories. These are demand-side changes, ecosystem protections, mitigation on farms, and mitigation insupply chains.On the demand side, limitingfood wasteis an effective way to reduce food emissions. Changes to a diet less reliant on animal products such asplant-based dietsare also effective.[125]: XXV This could includemilk substitutesandmeat alternatives.Several methods are also under investigation to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from livestock farming. These include genetic selection,[126][127]introduction ofmethanotrophic bacteriainto the rumen,[128][129]vaccines, feeds,[130]diet modification and grazing management.[131][132][133]
Deforestation
edit
Mean annual carbon loss from tropical deforestation[134]

Deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. A study shows annual carbon emissions (or carbon loss) from tropical deforestation have doubled during the last two decades and continue to increase. (0.97 ±0.16 PgC per year in 2001–2005 to 1.99 ±0.13 PgC per year in 2015–2019)[135][134]

Land-use change
edit
Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions for that region.[136]

Land-use change, e.g., the clearing of forests for agricultural use, can affect the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by altering how much carbon flows out of the atmosphere intocarbon sinks.[137]Accounting for land-use change can be understood as an attempt to measure "net" emissions, i.e., gross emissions from all sources minus the removal of emissions from the atmosphere by carbon sinks.[56]: 92–93 

There are substantial uncertainties in the measurement of net carbon emissions.[138]Additionally, there is controversy over how carbon sinks should be allocated between different regions and over time.[56]: 93 For instance, concentrating on more recent changes in carbon sinks is likely to favour those regions that have deforested earlier, e.g., Europe.

In1997, human-caused Indonesian peat fireswere estimated to have released between 13% and 40% of the average annual global carbon emissions caused by the burning offossil fuels.[139][140][141]

Transport of people and goods

edit
Aviation and shipping (dashed line) produce a significant proportion of global carbon dioxide emissions.

Transportation accounts for 15% of emissions worldwide.[142]Over a quarter of global transport CO2emissions are from road freight,[143]so many countries are further restrictingtruckCO2emissions to help limit climate change.[144]

Maritime transportaccounts for 3.5% to 4% of all greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide.[145][146]In 2022, the shipping industry's 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions made it "the sixth largest greenhouse gas emitter worldwide, ranking between Japan and Germany."[147][148][149]

Aviation

edit

Jet airlinerscontribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides,contrailsand particulates.In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO2emissions.[150]

In 2020, approximately 3.5% of the overall human impacts on climate are from the aviation sector. The impact of the sector on climate in the last 20 years had doubled, but the part of the contribution of the sector in comparison to other sectors did not change because other sectors grew as well.[151]

Some representative figures for CO2average direct emissions (not accounting for high-altitude radiative effects) of airliners expressed as CO2and CO2equivalent per passenger kilometer:[152]

  • Domestic, short distance, less than 463 km (288 mi): 257 g/km CO2or 259 g/km (14.7 oz/mile) CO2e
  • Long-distance flights: 113 g/km CO2or 114 g/km (6.5 oz/mile) CO2e

Buildings and construction

edit

In 2018, manufacturing construction materials and maintaining buildings accounted for 39% of carbon dioxide emissions from energy and process-related emissions. Manufacture of glass, cement, and steel accounted for 11% of energy and process-related emissions.[153]Because building construction is a significant investment, more than two-thirds of buildings in existence will still exist in 2050.Retrofittingexisting buildings to become more efficient will be necessary to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement; it will be insufficient to only apply low-emission standards to new construction.[154]Buildings that produce as much energy as they consume are calledzero-energy buildings,while buildings that produce more than they consume areenergy-plus.Low-energy buildingsare designed to be highly efficient with low total energy consumption and carbon emissions—a popular type is thepassive house.[153]

The construction industry has seen marked advances in building performance and energy efficiency over recent decades.[155]Green building practicesthat avoid emissions or capture the carbon already present in the environment, allow for reduced footprint of the construction industry, for example, use ofhempcrete,cellulose fiber insulation,andlandscaping.[156]

In 2019, the building sector was responsible for 12 GtCO2-eq emissions. More than 95% of these emissions were carbon, and the remaining 5% wereCH4,N2O,and halocarbon.[157]

The largest contributor to building sector emissions (49% of total) is the production of electricity for use in buildings.[158]

Of global building sector GHG emissions, 28% are produced during the manufacturing process of building materials such assteel,cement(a key component ofconcrete),[159]and glass.[158]The conventional process inherently related to the production of steel and cement results in large amounts of CO2emitted. For example, the production of steel in 2018 was responsible for 7 to 9% of the global CO2emissions.[160]

The remaining 23% of global building sector GHG emissions are produced directly on site during building operations.[158]

Embodied carbon emissions in construction sector

edit

Embodied carbon emissions,or upfront carbon emissions (UCE), are the result of creating and maintaining the materials that form a building.[161]As of 2018, "Embodied carbon is responsible 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 28% of global building sector emissions... Embodied carbon will be responsible for almost half of total new construction emissions between now and 2050."[162]

GHG emissions which are produced during the mining, processing, manufacturing, transportation and installation of building materials are referred to as theembodied carbon of a material.[163]The embodied carbon of a construction project can be reduced by using low-carbon materials for building structures and finishes, reducing demolition, and reusing buildings and construction materials whenever possible.[158]

Industrial processes

edit

As of 2020Secunda CTLis the world's largest single emitter, at 56.5 million tonnes CO2a year.[164]

Mining

edit

Flaringand venting ofnatural gasin oil wells is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Its contribution to greenhouse gases has declined by three-quarters in absolute terms since a peak in the 1970s of approximately 110 million metric tons/year, and in 2004 accounted for about 1/2 of one percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.[165]

TheWorld Bankestimates that 134 billion cubic meters of natural gas are flared or vented annually (2010 datum), an amount equivalent to the combined annual gas consumption ofGermanyandFranceor enough to supply the entire world with gas for 16 days. This flaring is highly concentrated: 10 countries account for 70% of emissions, and twenty for 85%.[166]

Steel and aluminum

edit

Steel and aluminum are key economic sectors where CO2 is produced. According to a 2013 study, "in 2004, the steel industry along emits about 590M tons of CO2,which accounts for 5.2% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions. CO2emitted from steel production primarily comes from energy consumption of fossil fuel as well as the use oflimestoneto purifyiron oxides."[167]

Plastics

edit

Plastics are produced mainly from fossil fuels. It was estimated that between 3% and 4% of global GHG emissions are associated with plastics' life cycles.[168]The EPA estimates[169]as many as five mass units of carbon dioxide are emitted for each mass unit ofpolyethylene terephthalate(PET) produced—the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles,[170]the transportation produce greenhouse gases also.[171]Plastic wasteemits carbon dioxide when it degrades. In 2018 research claimed that some of the most common plastics in the environment release the greenhouse gases methane andethylenewhen exposed to sunlight in an amount that can affect the earth climate.[172][173]

Due to the lightness of plastic versus glass or metal, plastic may reduce energy consumption. For example, packaging beverages in PET plastic rather than glass or metal is estimated to save 52% in transportation energy, if the glass or metal package issingle-use,of course.

In 2019 a new report "Plastic and Climate" was published. According to the report, the production and incineration of plastics will contribute in the equivalent of 850 million tonnes ofcarbon dioxide(CO2) to the atmosphere in 2019. With the current trend, annual life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of plastics will grow to 1.34 billion tonnes by 2030. By 2050, the life cycle emissions of plastics could reach 56 billion tonnes, as much as 14 percent of the Earth's remainingcarbon budget.[174]The report says that only solutions which involve areduction in consumptioncan solve the problem, while others like biodegradable plastic, ocean cleanup, using renewable energy in plastic industry can do little, and in some cases may even worsen it.[175]

Pulp and paper

edit

The global print and paper industry accounts for about 1% of global carbon dioxide emissions.[176]Greenhouse gas emissions from the pulp and paper industry are generated from the combustion of fossil fuels required for raw material production and transportation, wastewater treatment facilities, purchased power, paper transportation, printed product transportation, disposal and recycling.

Various services

edit

Digital services

edit

In 2020,data centers(excluding cryptocurrency mining) and data transmission each used about 1% of world electricity.[177]Thedigital sectorproduces between 2% and 4% of global GHG emissions,[178]a large part of which is fromchipmaking.[179]However the sector reduces emissions from other sectors which have a larger global share, such as transport of people,[180]and possibly buildings and industry.[181]

Mining forproof-of-workcryptocurrenciesrequires enormous amounts of electricity and consequently comes with a largecarbon footprint.[182]Proof-of-work blockchains such asBitcoin,Ethereum,Litecoin,andMonerowere estimated to have added between 3 million and 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere in the period from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017.[183]By the end of 2021, Bitcoin was estimated to produce 65.4 million tonnes of CO2,as much asGreece,[184]and consume between 91 and 177 terawatt-hours annually. Bitcoin is the least energy-efficient cryptocurrency, using 707.6 kilowatt-hours of electricity per transaction.[185][186][187]

A study in 2015 investigated the global electricity usage that can be ascribed toCommunication Technology(CT) between 2010 and 2030. Electricity usage from CT was divided into four principle categories: (i) consumer devices, including personal computers, mobile phones, TVs and home entertainment systems; (ii) network infrastructure; (iii) data center computation and storage; and lastly (iv) production of the above categories. The study estimated for the worst-case scenario, that CT electricity usage could contribute up to 23% of the globally released greenhouse gas emissions in 2030.[188]

Health care

edit

The healthcare sector produces 4.4–4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[189]

Based on the 2013 life cycle emissions in the health care sector, it is estimated that the GHG emissions associated with US health care activities may cause an additional 123,000 to 381,000 DALYs annually.[190]

Water supply and sanitation

edit
Solutions exist to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of water and sanitation services.[191]These solutions into three categories which partly overlap: Firstly "reducing water and energy consumption through lean and efficient approaches"; secondly "embracingcircular economyto produce energy and valuable products "; and thirdly by" planning to reduce GHG emissions through strategic decisions ".[192]: 28 The mentionedlean and efficient approachesinclude for example finding ways to reduce water loss from water networks and to reduce infiltration of rainwater or groundwater into sewers.[192]: 29 Also, incentives can to encourage households and industries toreduce their water consumptionand their energy requirements forwater heating.[192]: 31 There is another method to reduce the energy requirements for the treatment of raw water to make drinking water out of it: protecting the quality of the source water better.[192]: 32 

Tourism

edit

According toUNEP,globaltourismis a significant contributor to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.[193]

Emissions by other characteristics

edit

The responsibility for anthropogenic climate change differs substantially among individuals, e.g. between groups orcohorts.

By type of energy source

edit
Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity supply technologies, median values calculated byIPCC[194]
Lifecycle GHG emissions, in g CO2eq. per kWh, UNECE 2020[108]

Greenhouse gas emissions are one of theenvironmental impacts of electricity generation.Measurement oflife-cycle greenhouse gas emissionsinvolves calculating theglobal warming potentialof energy sources throughlife-cycle assessment.These are usually sources of only electrical energy but sometimes sources of heat are evaluated.[195]The findings are presented in units of global warming potential per unit of electrical energy generated by that source. The scale uses the global warming potential unit, thecarbon dioxide equivalent(CO2e), and the unit of electrical energy, thekilowatt hour(kWh). The goal of such assessments is to cover the full life of the source, from material and fuel mining through construction to operation and waste management.

In 2014, theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Changeharmonized thecarbon dioxide equivalent(CO2e) findings of the major electricity generating sources in use worldwide. This was done by analyzing the findings of hundreds of individual scientific papers assessing each energy source.[196]Coalis by far the worst emitter, followed bynatural gas,with solar, wind and nuclear all low-carbon. Hydropower, biomass, geothermal and ocean power may generally be low-carbon, but poor design or other factors could result in higher emissions from individual power stations.

By socio-economic class and age

edit
This pie chart illustrates both total emissions for each income group, and emissionsper personwithin each income group. For example, the 10% with the highest incomes are responsible for half of carbon emissions, and its members emit an average of more than five times as muchper personas members of the lowest half of the income scale.[197]
Though total CO2emissions (size of pie charts) differ substantially among high-emitting regions, the pattern of higher income classes emitting more than lower income classes is consistent across regions.[198]The world's top 1% of emitters emit over 1000 times more than the bottom 1%.[198]
Scaling the effect of wealth to the national level: richer(developed)countries emit more CO2per person than poorer(developing)countries.[199]Emissions are roughly proportional toGDPper person, though the rate of increase diminishes with average GDP/pp of about $10,000.

Fueled by theconsumptive lifestyleofwealthy people,the wealthiest 5% of the global population has been responsible for 37% of the absolute increase in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. It can be seen that there is a strong relationship between income and per capita carbon dioxide emissions.[48]Almost half of the increase in absolute global emissions has been caused by the richest 10% of the population.[200]In the newest report from the IPCC 2022, it states that the lifestyle consumptions of the poor and middle class in emerging economies produce approximately 5–50 times less the amount that the high class in already developed high-income countries.[201][202]Variations in regional, and national per capita emissions partly reflect different development stages, but they also vary widely at similar income levels. The 10% of households with the highest per capita emissions contribute a disproportionately large share of global household greenhouse gas emissions.[202]

Studies find that the most affluent citizens of the world are responsible for mostenvironmental impacts,and robust action by them is necessary for prospects of moving towards safer environmental conditions.[203][204]

According to a 2020 report byOxfamand theStockholm Environment Institute,[205][206]the richest 1% of the global population have caused twice as much carbon emissions as the poorest 50% over the 25 years from 1990 to 2015.[207][208][209]This was, respectively, during that period, 15% of cumulative emissions compared to 7%.[210]The bottom half of the population is directly responsible for less than 20% of energy footprints and consume less than the top 5% in terms of trade-corrected energy. The largest disproportionality was identified to be in the domain of transport, where e.g. the top 10% consume 56% of vehicle fuel and conduct 70% of vehicle purchases.[211]However, wealthy individuals are also oftenshareholdersand typically have more influence[212]and, especially in the case ofbillionaires,may also direct lobbying efforts, direct financial decisions, and/or control companies.

Based on a study in 32 developed countries, researchers found that "seniors in the United States and Australia have the highest per capita footprint, twice the Western average. The trend is mainly due to changes in expenditure patterns of seniors".[213]

Methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions

edit

Governmentshave taken action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions tomitigate climate change.Countries and regions listed in Annex I of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC) (i.e., the OECD and former planned economies of the Soviet Union) are required to submit periodic assessments to the UNFCCC of actions they are taking to address climate change.[214]: 3 Policies implemented by governments include for example national and regional targets to reduce emissions, promotingenergy efficiency,and support for anenergy transition.

Climate change mitigation(or decarbonisation) is action to limit thegreenhouse gasesin the atmosphere that causeclimate change.Climate change mitigation actions includeconserving energyandreplacing fossil fuelswithclean energy sources.Secondary mitigation strategies include changes to land use andremoving carbon dioxide (CO2)from the atmosphere. Costs of climate change mitigation are estimated at around 1% and 2% ofGDP.[215][216]Current climate change mitigation policies are insufficient as they would still result in global warming of about 2.7 °C by 2100,[217]significantly above the 2015Paris Agreement's[218]goal of limiting global warming to below 2 °C.[219][220]

Solar energyandwind powercan replace fossil fuels at the lowest cost compared to otherrenewable energyoptions.[221]The availability of sunshine and wind is variable and can requireelectrical gridupgrades, such as usinglong-distance electricity transmissionto group a range of power sources.[222]Energy storagecan also be used to even out power output, anddemand managementcan limit power use when power generation is low. Cleanly generatedelectricity can usually replace fossil fuelsfor powering transportation, heating buildings, and running industrial processes.[citation needed]Certain processes are more difficult to decarbonise, such asair travelandcement production.Carbon capture and storage(CCS) can be an option to reduce net emissions in these circumstances, although fossil fuel power plants with CCS technology is currently a high cost climate change mitigation strategy.[223]

Projections for future emissions

edit
Figure3 from the International Energy Outlook 2023 (IEO2023) report.[224]Aggregate energy‑related carbon emissions remain constant to 2050 under the low GDP growth case, otherwise emissions rise significantly.

In October 2023, the USEnergy Information Administration(EIA) released a series of projections out to 2050 based on current ascertainable policy interventions.[224][225][226]Unlike many integratedsystems modelsin this field, emissions are allowed to float rather than be pinned tonet‑zeroin 2050. Asensitivity analysisvaried key parameters, primarily future GDP growth (2.6% paas reference, variously 1.8% and 3.4%) and secondarilytechnological learning rates,futurecrude oil prices,and similarexogenous inputs.The model results are far from encouraging. In no case did aggregate energy-related carbon emissions ever dip below 2022 levels (see figure3 plot). The IEO2023 exploration provides a benchmark and suggests that far stronger action is needed.

The annual "Emissions Gap Report" byUNEPstated in 2022 that it was necessary to almost halve emissions. "To get on track for limiting global warming to 1.5°C, global annual GHG emissions must be reduced by 45 per cent compared with emissions projections under policies currently in place in just eight years, and they must continue to decline rapidly after 2030, to avoid exhausting the limited remaining atmosphericcarbon budget."[227]: xvi The report commented that the world should focus on broad-based economy-wide transformations and not incremental change.[227]: xvi 

In 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released itsSixth Assessment Reporton climate change. It warned that greenhouse gas emissions must peak before 2025 at the latest and decline 43% by 2030 to have a good chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F).[228][229]Or in the words of Secretary-General of the United NationsAntónio Guterres:"Main emitters must drastically cut emissions starting this year".[230]

Country examples

edit

Lists of countries

edit
The top 40 countries emitting all greenhouse gases, showing both that derived from all sources including land clearance and forestry and also the CO2component excluding those sources. Per capita figures are included."World Resources Institute data".Indonesia and Brazil show very much higher than on graphs simply showing fossil fuel use.

In 2019, China, the United States, India, the EU27+UK, Russia, and Japan - the world's largest CO2emitters - together accounted for 51% of the population, 62.5% of global gross domestic product, 62% of total global fossil fuel consumption and emitted 67% of total global fossil CO2.Emissions from these five countries and the EU28 show different changes in 2019 compared to 2018: the largest relative increase is found for China (+3.4%), followed by India (+1.6%). On the contrary, the EU27+UK (-3.8%), the United States (-2.6%), Japan (-2.1%) and Russia (-0.8%) reduced their fossil CO2emissions.[231]

2019 fossil CO2emissions by country[231]
Country Total emissions
(Mton)
Share
(%)
Per capita
(ton)
Per GDP
(ton/k$)
Global Total 38,016.57 100.00 4.93 0.29
China 11,535.20 30.34 8.12 0.51
United States 5,107.26 13.43 15.52 0.25
EU27+UK 3,303.97 8.69 6.47 0.14
India 2,597.36 6.83 1.90 0.28
Russia 1,792.02 4.71 12.45 0.45
Japan 1,153.72 3.03 9.09 0.22
International Shipping 730.26 1.92 - -
Germany 702.60 1.85 8.52 0.16
Iran 701.99 1.85 8.48 0.68
South Korea 651.87 1.71 12.70 0.30
International Aviation 627.48 1.65 - -
Indonesia 625.66 1.65 2.32 0.20
Saudi Arabia 614.61 1.62 18.00 0.38
Canada 584.85 1.54 15.69 0.32
South Africa 494.86 1.30 8.52 0.68
Mexico 485.00 1.28 3.67 0.19
Brazil 478.15 1.26 2.25 0.15
Australia 433.38 1.14 17.27 0.34
Turkey 415.78 1.09 5.01 0.18
United Kingdom 364.91 0.96 5.45 0.12
Italy,San Marinoand the Holy See 331.56 0.87 5.60 0.13
Poland 317.65 0.84 8.35 0.25
FranceandMonaco 314.74 0.83 4.81 0.10
Vietnam 305.25 0.80 3.13 0.39
Kazakhstan 277.36 0.73 14.92 0.57
Taiwan 276.78 0.73 11.65 0.23
Thailand 275.06 0.72 3.97 0.21
Spainand Andorra 259.31 0.68 5.58 0.13
Egypt 255.37 0.67 2.52 0.22
Malaysia 248.83 0.65 7.67 0.27
Pakistan 223.63 0.59 1.09 0.22
United Arab Emirates 222.61 0.59 22.99 0.34
Argentina 199.41 0.52 4.42 0.20
Iraq 197.61 0.52 4.89 0.46
Ukraine 196.40 0.52 4.48 0.36
Algeria 180.57 0.47 4.23 0.37
Netherlands 156.41 0.41 9.13 0.16
Philippines 150.64 0.40 1.39 0.16
Bangladesh 110.16 0.29 0.66 0.14
Venezuela 110.06 0.29 3.36 0.39
Qatar 106.53 0.28 38.82 0.41
Czechia 105.69 0.28 9.94 0.25
Belgium 104.41 0.27 9.03 0.18
Nigeria 100.22 0.26 0.50 0.10
Kuwait 98.95 0.26 23.29 0.47
Uzbekistan 94.99 0.25 2.90 0.40
Oman 92.78 0.24 18.55 0.67
Turkmenistan 90.52 0.24 15.23 0.98
Chile 89.89 0.24 4.90 0.20
Colombia 86.55 0.23 1.74 0.12
Romania 78.63 0.21 4.04 0.14
Morocco 73.91 0.19 2.02 0.27
Austria 72.36 0.19 8.25 0.14
Serbia and Montenegro 70.69 0.19 7.55 0.44
IsraelandPalestine 68.33 0.18 7.96 0.18
Belarus 66.34 0.17 7.03 0.37
Greece 65.57 0.17 5.89 0.20
Peru 56.29 0.15 1.71 0.13
Singapore 53.37 0.14 9.09 0.10
Hungary 53.18 0.14 5.51 0.17
Libya 52.05 0.14 7.92 0.51
Portugal 48.47 0.13 4.73 0.14
Myanmar 48.31 0.13 0.89 0.17
Norway 47.99 0.13 8.89 0.14
Sweden 44.75 0.12 4.45 0.08
Hong Kong 44.02 0.12 5.88 0.10
Finland 43.41 0.11 7.81 0.16
Bulgaria 43.31 0.11 6.20 0.27
North Korea 42.17 0.11 1.64 0.36
Ecuador 40.70 0.11 2.38 0.21
SwitzerlandandLiechtenstein 39.37 0.10 4.57 0.07
New Zealand 38.67 0.10 8.07 0.18
Ireland 36.55 0.10 7.54 0.09
Slovakia 35.99 0.09 6.60 0.20
Azerbaijan 35.98 0.09 3.59 0.25
Mongolia 35.93 0.09 11.35 0.91
Bahrain 35.44 0.09 21.64 0.48
Bosnia and Herzegovina 33.50 0.09 9.57 0.68
Trinidad and Tobago 32.74 0.09 23.81 0.90
Tunisia 32.07 0.08 2.72 0.25
Denmark 31.12 0.08 5.39 0.09
Cuba 31.04 0.08 2.70 0.11
Syria 29.16 0.08 1.58 1.20
Jordan 28.34 0.07 2.81 0.28
Sri Lanka 27.57 0.07 1.31 0.10
Lebanon 27.44 0.07 4.52 0.27
Dominican Republic 27.28 0.07 2.48 0.14
Angola 25.82 0.07 0.81 0.12
Bolivia 24.51 0.06 2.15 0.24
SudanandSouth Sudan 22.57 0.06 0.40 0.13
Guatemala 21.20 0.06 1.21 0.15
Kenya 19.81 0.05 0.38 0.09
Croatia 19.12 0.05 4.62 0.16
Estonia 18.50 0.05 14.19 0.38
Ethiopia 18.25 0.05 0.17 0.07
Ghana 16.84 0.04 0.56 0.10
Cambodia 16.49 0.04 1.00 0.23
New Caledonia 15.66 0.04 55.25 1.67
Slovenia 15.37 0.04 7.38 0.19
Nepal 15.02 0.04 0.50 0.15
Lithuania 13.77 0.04 4.81 0.13
Côte d'Ivoire 13.56 0.04 0.53 0.10
Georgia 13.47 0.04 3.45 0.24
Tanzania 13.34 0.04 0.22 0.09
Kyrgyzstan 11.92 0.03 1.92 0.35
Panama 11.63 0.03 2.75 0.09
Afghanistan 11.00 0.03 0.30 0.13
Yemen 10.89 0.03 0.37 0.17
Zimbabwe 10.86 0.03 0.63 0.26
Honduras 10.36 0.03 1.08 0.19
Cameroon 10.10 0.03 0.40 0.11
Senegal 9.81 0.03 0.59 0.18
Luxembourg 9.74 0.03 16.31 0.14
Mozambique 9.26 0.02 0.29 0.24
Moldova 9.23 0.02 2.29 0.27
Costa Rica 8.98 0.02 1.80 0.09
North Macedonia 8.92 0.02 4.28 0.26
Tajikistan 8.92 0.02 0.96 0.28
Paraguay 8.47 0.02 1.21 0.09
Latvia 8.38 0.02 4.38 0.14
Benin 8.15 0.02 0.69 0.21
Mauritania 7.66 0.02 1.64 0.33
Zambia 7.50 0.02 0.41 0.12
Jamaica 7.44 0.02 2.56 0.26
Cyprus 7.41 0.02 6.19 0.21
El Salvador 7.15 0.02 1.11 0.13
Botswana 7.04 0.02 2.96 0.17
Brunei 7.02 0.02 15.98 0.26
Laos 6.78 0.02 0.96 0.12
Uruguay 6.56 0.02 1.89 0.09
Armenia 5.92 0.02 2.02 0.15
Curaçao 5.91 0.02 36.38 1.51
Nicaragua 5.86 0.02 0.92 0.17
Congo 5.80 0.02 1.05 0.33
Albania 5.66 0.01 1.93 0.14
Uganda 5.34 0.01 0.12 0.06
Namibia 4.40 0.01 1.67 0.18
Mauritius 4.33 0.01 3.41 0.15
Madagascar 4.20 0.01 0.16 0.09
Papua New Guinea 4.07 0.01 0.47 0.11
Iceland 3.93 0.01 11.53 0.19
Puerto Rico 3.91 0.01 1.07 0.04
Barbados 3.83 0.01 13.34 0.85
Burkina Faso 3.64 0.01 0.18 0.08
Haiti 3.58 0.01 0.32 0.18
Gabon 3.48 0.01 1.65 0.11
Equatorial Guinea 3.47 0.01 2.55 0.14
Réunion 3.02 0.01 3.40 -
Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.98 0.01 0.03 0.03
Guinea 2.92 0.01 0.22 0.09
Togo 2.85 0.01 0.35 0.22
Bahamas 2.45 0.01 6.08 0.18
Niger 2.36 0.01 0.10 0.08
Bhutan 2.12 0.01 2.57 0.24
Suriname 2.06 0.01 3.59 0.22
Martinique 1.95 0.01 5.07 -
Guadeloupe 1.87 0.00 4.17 -
Malawi 1.62 0.00 0.08 0.08
Guyana 1.52 0.00 1.94 0.20
Sierra Leone 1.40 0.00 0.18 0.10
Fiji 1.36 0.00 1.48 0.11
Palau 1.33 0.00 59.88 4.09
Macao 1.27 0.00 1.98 0.02
Liberia 1.21 0.00 0.24 0.17
Rwanda 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.04
Eswatini 1.14 0.00 0.81 0.11
Djibouti 1.05 0.00 1.06 0.20
Seychelles 1.05 0.00 10.98 0.37
Malta 1.04 0.00 2.41 0.05
Mali 1.03 0.00 0.05 0.02
Cabo Verde 1.02 0.00 1.83 0.26
Somalia 0.97 0.00 0.06 0.57
Maldives 0.91 0.00 2.02 0.09
Chad 0.89 0.00 0.06 0.04
Aruba 0.78 0.00 7.39 0.19
Eritrea 0.75 0.00 0.14 0.08
Lesotho 0.75 0.00 0.33 0.13
Gibraltar 0.69 0.00 19.88 0.45
French Guiana 0.61 0.00 2.06 -
French Polynesia 0.60 0.00 2.08 0.10
The Gambia 0.59 0.00 0.27 0.11
Greenland 0.54 0.00 9.47 0.19
Antigua and Barbuda 0.51 0.00 4.90 0.24
Central African Republic 0.49 0.00 0.10 0.11
Guinea-Bissau 0.44 0.00 0.22 0.11
Cayman Islands 0.40 0.00 6.38 0.09
Timor-Leste 0.38 0.00 0.28 0.10
Belize 0.37 0.00 0.95 0.14
Bermuda 0.35 0.00 5.75 0.14
Burundi 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.04
Saint Lucia 0.30 0.00 1.65 0.11
Western Sahara 0.30 0.00 0.51 -
Grenada 0.23 0.00 2.10 0.12
Comoros 0.21 0.00 0.25 0.08
Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.19 0.00 3.44 0.14
São Tomé and Príncipe 0.16 0.00 0.75 0.19
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.15 0.00 1.32 0.11
Samoa 0.14 0.00 0.70 0.11
Solomon Islands 0.14 0.00 0.22 0.09
Tonga 0.13 0.00 1.16 0.20
Turks and Caicos Islands 0.13 0.00 3.70 0.13
British Virgin Islands 0.12 0.00 3.77 0.17
Dominica 0.10 0.00 1.38 0.12
Vanuatu 0.09 0.00 0.30 0.09
Saint Pierre and Miquelon 0.06 0.00 9.72 -
Cook Islands 0.04 0.00 2.51 -
Falkland Islands 0.03 0.00 10.87 -
Kiribati 0.03 0.00 0.28 0.13
Anguilla 0.02 0.00 1.54 0.12
Saint Helena,AscensionandTristan da Cunha 0.02 0.00 3.87 -
Faroe Islands 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00

United States

edit
Though the U.S.'sper capitaand per GDP emissions have declined significantly, the raw numerical decline in emissions is much less substantial.[232]
TheUnited Statesproduced 5.2 billionmetric tonsofcarbon dioxide equivalentgreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020,[233]the second largest in the world aftergreenhouse gas emissions by Chinaand among thecountries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person.In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of worldGHG,followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%.[234]In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country.[235][236][237]Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highestcountry by greenhouse gas emissions per person.[238]

China

edit
China has the most total annual emissions (area of rectangle) of any nation, and has higher than averageper capitaemissions.[239]
Cumulatively over time, emissions from China have caused more economic damage globally than any other nation except the U.S.[240]
China's greenhouse gas emissions are the largest of any country in the world both inproductionandconsumptionterms, and stem mainly fromcoal burning,includingcoal power,coal mining,[241]andblast furnacesproducing iron and steel.[242]When measuring production-based emissions,Chinaemitted over 14 gigatonnes (Gt)CO2eqofgreenhouse gasesin 2019,[243]27% of the world total.[244][245]When measuring in consumption-based terms, which adds emissions associated with imported goods and extracts those associated with exported goods, China accounts for 13 gigatonnes (Gt) or 25% of global emissions.[246]According to theCarbon Majors Database,Chinese state coal production alone accounts for 14% of historic global emissions.[247]

India

edit
Greenhouse gas emissions byIndiaare the third largest in the world and the main source is coal.[248]India emitted 2.8 Gt ofCO2eqin 2016 (2.5 includingLULUCF).[249][250]79% were CO2,14% methane and 5% nitrous oxide.[250]India emits about 3 gigatonnes (Gt)CO2eqofgreenhouse gaseseach year; about two tons per person,[251]which is half the world average.[252]The country emits 7% of global emissions.[253]

Society and culture

edit

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

edit

In 2020,carbon dioxide emissionsfell by 6.4% or 2.3 billion tonnes globally.[254]In April 2020,NOxemissions fell by up to 30%.[255]In China,lockdownsand other measures resulted in a 26% decrease in coal consumption, and a 50% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions.[256]Greenhouse gas emissions rebounded later in the pandemic as many countries began lifting restrictions, with the direct impact of pandemic policies having a negligible long-term impact on climate change.[254][257]

edit

In March 2024, theInternational Energy Agency(IEA) reported that in 2023, global CO2 emissions from energy sources increased by 1.1%, rising by 410 million tonnes to a record 37.4 billion tonnes, primarily due to coal. Drought-related decreases in hydropower contributed to a 170 million tonne rise in emissions, which would have otherwise led to a decrease in the electricity sector's emissions. The implementation ofclean energytechnologies likesolar,wind,nuclear,heat pumps,andelectric vehiclessince 2019 has significantly tempered emissions growth, which would have been threefold without these technologies. The past decade has seen the slowest average annual growth in emissions since theGreat Depression,at just over 0.5%. Advanced economies' emissions fell by 4.5% in 2023, despite a 1.7% GDP growth, reaching levels last seen fifty years ago. China experienced the largest increase in emissions at approximately 565 million tonnes, exacerbated by a historic decrease inhydropower,pushing its per capita emissions 15% higher than those in advanced economies. In India, emissions increased by 190 million tonnes due to strong GDP growth and reduced hydroelectricity production following a weak monsoon, with itsper capita emissionsremaining significantly below the global average.[258]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^"Territorial (MtCO2) ".GlobalCarbonAtlas.org.Retrieved30 December2021.(choose "Chart view"; use download link)
    ● Data for 2020 is also presented inPopovich, Nadja; Plumer, Brad (12 November 2021)."Who Has The Most Historical Responsibility for Climate Change?".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 29 December 2021.
    ● Source for country populations:"List of the populations of the world's countries, dependencies, and territories".Encyclopedia Britannica.
  2. ^"Chapter 2: Emissions trends and drivers"(PDF).Ipcc_Ar6_Wgiii.2022. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2022-04-12.Retrieved2022-04-04.
  3. ^Ritchie, Hannah; Rosado, Pablo; Roser, Max (2023-12-28)."CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions".Our World in Data.
  4. ^"Global Carbon Project (GCP)".www.globalcarbonproject.org.Archived fromthe originalon 4 April 2019.Retrieved2019-05-19.
  5. ^abc"Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide: A Greenhouse Gas Showdown".One Green Planet.30 September 2014.Retrieved13 February2020.
  6. ^Milman, Oliver (2024-04-06)."Scientists confirm record highs for three most important heat-trapping gases".The Guardian.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved2024-04-08.
  7. ^Ritchie, Hannah;Roser, Max;Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11)."CO2and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ".Our World in Data.
  8. ^abwidworld_admin (2021-10-20)."The World #InequalityReport 2022 presents the most up-to-date & complete data on inequality worldwide".World Inequality Report 2022(in French).Retrieved2023-07-14.
  9. ^ab"Carbon inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5C goal – IEEP AISBL".Retrieved2023-07-14.
  10. ^abGore, Tim (2021-11-05).Carbon Inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5 °C goal.Institute for European Environmental Policy.doi:10.21201/2021.8274.hdl:10546/621305.ISBN9781787488274.S2CID242037589.
  11. ^ab"AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change — IPCC".Retrieved2023-07-14.
  12. ^abc Grubb, M. (July–September 2003)."The economics of the Kyoto protocol"(PDF).World Economics.4(3). Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 17 July 2011.
  13. ^"What is a carbon footprint".www.conservation.org.Retrieved2023-05-28.
  14. ^IPCC, 2022:Annex I: GlossaryArchived13 March 2023 at theWayback Machine[van Diemen, R., J.B.R. Matthews, V. Möller, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, A. Reisinger, S. Semenov (eds)]. In IPCC, 2022:Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeArchived2 August 2022 at theWayback Machine[P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.020
  15. ^ab"Carbon Accounting".Corporate Finance Institute.Retrieved2023-01-06.
  16. ^"Solar Radiation and the Earth's Energy Balance".The Climate System – EESC 2100 Spring 2007.Columbia University. Archived fromthe originalon 4 November 2004.Retrieved15 October2010.
  17. ^Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y,Mauritzen C,Mokssit A, Peterson T, Prather M (2007)."Historical Overview of Climate Change Science"(PDF).In Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds.).Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 97. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 26 November 2018.Retrieved25 March2014.
  18. ^"The Elusive Absolute Surface Air Temperature (SAT)".Goddard Institute for Space Studies.NOAA.Archivedfrom the original on 5 September 2015.Retrieved3 September2008.
  19. ^"Yearly average temperature".Climate Change Tracker.
  20. ^A concise description of the greenhouse effect is given in theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report,"What is the Greenhouse Effect?"FAQ 1.3 – AR4 WGI Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climate Change ScienceArchived5 August 2019 at theWayback Machine,IIPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Chapter 1, page 115: "To balance the absorbed incoming [solar] energy, the Earth must, on average, radiate the same amount of energy back to space. Because the Earth is much colder than the Sun, it radiates at much longer wavelengths, primarily in the infrared part of the spectrum (see Figure 1). Much of this thermal radiation emitted by the land and ocean is absorbed by the atmosphere, including clouds, and reradiated back to Earth. This is called the greenhouse effect."
    Schneider, Stephen H. (2001)."Global Climate Change in the Human Perspective".In Bengtsson, Lennart O.; Hammer, Claus U. (eds.).Geosphere-biosphere Interactions and Climate.Cambridge University Press. pp. 90–91.ISBN978-0-521-78238-8.Archivedfrom the original on 2 August 2020.Retrieved31 May2018.
    Claussen, E.; Cochran, V.A.; Davis, D.P., eds. (2001)."Global Climate Data".Climate Change: Science, Strategies, & Solutions.University of Michigan. p. 373.ISBN978-9004120242.Archivedfrom the original on 18 May 2020.Retrieved1 June2018.
    Allaby, A.; Allaby, M. (1999).A Dictionary of Earth Sciences.Oxford University Press. p.244.ISBN978-0-19-280079-4.
  21. ^Rebecca, Lindsey (14 January 2009)."Climate and Earth's Energy Budget: Feature Articles".earthobservatory.nasa.gov.Archivedfrom the original on 21 January 2021.Retrieved14 December2020.
  22. ^Fox, Alex."Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction".Smithsonian Magazine.Archivedfrom the original on 10 June 2021.Retrieved22 June2021.
  23. ^Lindsey, Rebecca; Dahlman, Luann."Climate Change: Global Temperature".NOAA Climate.gov.
  24. ^abRitchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (11 May 2020)."Greenhouse gas emissions".Our World in Data.Retrieved22 June2021.
  25. ^Dhakal, S., J.C. Minx, F.L. Toth, A. Abdel-Aziz, M.J. Figueroa Meza, K. Hubacek, I.G.C. Jonckheere, Yong-Gun Kim, G.F. Nemet, S. Pachauri, X.C. Tan, T. Wiedmann, 2022:Chapter 2: Emissions Trends and Drivers.In IPCC, 2022:Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.004
  26. ^"Water Vapor".earthobservatory.nasa.gov.2023-06-30.Retrieved2023-08-16.
  27. ^Johnston, Chris; Milman, Oliver; Vidal, John (15 October 2016)."Climate change: global deal reached to limit use of hydrofluorocarbons".The Guardian.Retrieved21 August2018.
  28. ^"Climate change: 'Monumental' deal to cut HFCs, fastest growing greenhouse gases".BBC News.15 October 2016.Retrieved15 October2016.
  29. ^"Nations, Fighting Powerful Refrigerant That Warms Planet, Reach Landmark Deal".The New York Times.15 October 2016.Retrieved15 October2016.
  30. ^Vaara, Miska (2003),Use of ozone depleting substances in laboratories,TemaNord, p. 170,ISBN978-9289308847,archived fromthe originalon 6 August 2011
  31. ^Montreal Protocol
  32. ^ab"NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (An Introduction)".NOAA. 2020.Retrieved2 November2023.
  33. ^Fox, Alex."Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction".Smithsonian Magazine.Retrieved22 June2021.
  34. ^"Executive Summary – CO2 Emissions in 2023 – Analysis".IEA.Retrieved2024-03-30.
  35. ^"It's critical to tackle coal emissions – Analysis".IEA.8 October 2021.Retrieved9 October2021.
  36. ^US EPA, OAR (12 January 2016)."Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data".www.epa.gov.Retrieved13 September2021.
  37. ^Steinfeld, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; de Haan, C. (2006).Livestock's long shadow(Report). FAO Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative.
  38. ^Ciais, Phillipe; Sabine, Christopher; et al."Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles"(PDF).In Stocker Thomas F.; et al. (eds.).Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.IPCC. p. 473.
  39. ^Chrobak, Ula (14 May 2021)."Fighting climate change means taking laughing gas seriously".Knowable Magazine.doi:10.1146/knowable-051321-2.S2CID236555111.Retrieved8 March2022.
  40. ^"Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities"(PDF).Global Methane Initiative.2020.
  41. ^"Sources of methane emissions".International Energy Agency.20 August 2020.
  42. ^"Key facts and findings".Fao.org.Food and Agricultural Organization. n.d. Archived fromthe originalon 10 October 2023.Retrieved25 October2022.
  43. ^PBL (21 December 2020)."Trends in Global CO2and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions; 2020 Report ".PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Retrieved8 September2021.
  44. ^IPCC (2019)."Summary for Policy Makers"(PDF).IPCC:99. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2022-08-07.Retrieved2022-04-04.
  45. ^Dodman, David (April 2009)."Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories".Environment and Urbanization.21(1): 185–201.Bibcode:2009EnUrb..21..185D.doi:10.1177/0956247809103016.ISSN0956-2478.S2CID154669383.
  46. ^"Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says".The Guardian.10 July 2017.Retrieved9 April2021.
  47. ^Gustin, Georgina (9 July 2017)."25 Fossil Fuel Producers Responsible for Half Global Emissions in Past 3 Decades".Inside Climate News.Retrieved4 May2021.
  48. ^abcdRitchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11)."CO2and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ".Our World in Data.
  49. ^ab"Global CO2emissions: annual increase halves in 2008 ".Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) website. 25 June 2009. Archived fromthe originalon 19 December 2010.Retrieved5 May2010.
  50. ^"Global Carbon Mechanisms: Emerging lessons and implications (CTC748)".Carbon Trust. March 2009. p. 24.Retrieved31 March2010.
  51. ^Vaughan, Adam (7 December 2015)."Global emissions to fall for first time during a period of economic growth".The Guardian.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved23 December2016.
  52. ^"CO2emissions per capita vs GDP per capita ".Our World in Data.Retrieved2023-06-21.
  53. ^abcFriedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Anddrew, Robbie M.; et al. (11 November 2022)."Global Carbon Budget 2022 (Data description paper)".Earth System Science Data.14(11): 4811–4900.Bibcode:2022ESSD...14.4811F.doi:10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022.hdl:20.500.11850/594889.Data available for download at Our World in Data (cumulativeandannualandper capita).
  54. ^abBader, N.; Bleichwitz, R. (2009)."Measuring urban greenhouse gas emissions: The challenge of comparability".S.A.P.I.EN.S.2(3).Retrieved11 September2011.
  55. ^"Transcript: The Path Forward: Al Gore on Climate and the Economy".Washington Post.ISSN0190-8286.Retrieved6 May2021.
  56. ^abcdefgBanuri, T. (1996).Equity and social considerations. In: Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (J.P. Bruce et al. Eds.).This version: Printed by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. PDF version: IPCC website.ISBN978-0521568548.
  57. ^ World energy outlook 2007 edition – China and India insights.International Energy Agency (IEA), Head of Communication and Information Office, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. 2007. p. 600.ISBN978-9264027305.Archived fromthe originalon 15 June 2010.Retrieved4 May2010.
  58. ^Holtz-Eakin, D. (1995)."Stoking the fires? CO2emissions and economic growth "(PDF).Journal of Public Economics.57(1): 85–101.doi:10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X.S2CID152513329.
  59. ^ "Selected Development Indicators"(PDF).World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change(PDF).Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2010. Tables A1 and A2.doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7987-5.ISBN978-0821379875.
  60. ^ Helm, D.; et al. (10 December 2007).Too Good To Be True? The UK's Climate Change Record(PDF).p. 3. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 15 July 2011.
  61. ^abc World Energy Outlook 2009(PDF),Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2009, pp. 179–80,ISBN978-9264061309,archived fromthe original(PDF)on 24 September 2015,retrieved27 December2011
  62. ^ab Davis, S.J.; K. Caldeira (8 March 2010)."Consumption-based Accounting of CO2Emissions "(PDF).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.107(12): 5687–5692.Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.5687D.doi:10.1073/pnas.0906974107.PMC2851800.PMID20212122.Retrieved18 April2011.
  63. ^Herzog, T. (November 2006). Yamashita, M.B. (ed.).Target: intensity – an analysis of greenhouse gas intensity targets(PDF).World Resources Institute.ISBN978-1569736388.Retrieved11 April2011.
  64. ^Gore, Al (12 December 2020)."Opinion | Al Gore: Where I Find Hope".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.Archivedfrom the original on 18 August 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  65. ^"Climate TRACE to track real-time global carbon emissions".Yale Climate Connections.17 August 2020.Archivedfrom the original on 12 July 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  66. ^Freedman, Andrew."Al Gore's Climate TRACE tracking group finds vast undercounts of emissions".Axios.Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2021.Retrieved27 September2021.
  67. ^Roberts, David (16 July 2020)."The entire world's carbon emissions will finally be trackable in real time".Vox.Archivedfrom the original on 10 July 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  68. ^"Methane: A Threat to People and Planet".Rocky Mountain Institute.7 July 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 10 July 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  69. ^"Transcript: The Path Forward: Al Gore on Climate and the Economy".The Washington Post.ISSN0190-8286.Archivedfrom the original on 25 April 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  70. ^Puko, Timothy (13 April 2021)."John Kerry Says U.S. Will Hold China to Account on Climate Pledges".The Wall Street Journal.ISSN0099-9660.Archivedfrom the original on 10 July 2021.Retrieved10 July2021.
  71. ^Peters, Adele (15 July 2020)."This Al Gore-supported project uses AI to track the world's emissions in near real time".Fast Company.Archivedfrom the original on 12 May 2021.Retrieved15 July2021.
  72. ^Botzen, W.J.W.; et al. (2008). "Cumulative CO2emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt ".Climate Policy.8(6): 570.Bibcode:2008CliPo...8..569B.doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0539.S2CID153972794.
  73. ^Buis, Alan (Oct 19, 2019)."The Atmosphere: Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide".Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.Retrieved2023-07-14.
  74. ^"Methane and climate change – Global Methane Tracker 2022 – Analysis".IEA.Retrieved2023-07-14.
  75. ^Prather, Michael J.; Hsu, Juno; DeLuca, Nicole M.; Jackman, Charles H.; Oman, Luke D.; Douglass, Anne R.; Fleming, Eric L.; Strahan, Susan E.; Steenrod, Stephen D.; Søvde, O. Amund; Isaksen, Ivar S. A.; Froidevaux, Lucien; Funke, Bernd (2015-06-16)."Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability".Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.120(11): 5693–5705.Bibcode:2015JGRD..120.5693P.doi:10.1002/2015JD023267.ISSN2169-897X.PMC4744722.PMID26900537.
  76. ^"Climate Watch - Historical Emissions Data".World Resources Institute.Retrieved23 October2021.
  77. ^abc Höhne, N.; et al. (24 September 2010)."Contributions of individual countries' emissions to climate change and their uncertainty"(PDF).Climatic Change.106(3): 359–91.doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9930-6.S2CID59149563.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 26 April 2012.
  78. ^Specktor, Brandon (1 October 2019)."Humans Are Disturbing Earth's Carbon Cycle More Than the Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Did".livescience.com.Retrieved8 July2021.
  79. ^"Transport emissions".ec.europa.eu.Retrieved18 October2021.
  80. ^US EPA, OAR (10 September 2015)."Carbon Pollution from Transportation".www.epa.gov.Retrieved18 October2021.
  81. ^"Rail and waterborne — best for low-carbon motorised transport — European Environment Agency".www.eea.europa.eu.Retrieved18 October2021.
  82. ^"Luxembourg 2020 – Analysis".IEA.25 March 2020.Retrieved18 October2021.
  83. ^Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (11 May 2020)."CO2and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ".Our World in Data.
  84. ^"Why The Building Sector? – Architecture 2030".Retrieved18 October2021.
  85. ^"Global Assessment: Urgent steps must be taken to reduce methane emissions this decade".United Nations.6 May 2021.
  86. ^abFriedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Andrew, Robbie M.; Hauck, Judith; Olsen, Are; Peters, Glen P.; Peters, Wouter; Pongratz, Julia; Sitch, Stephen; Le Quéré, Corinne; Canadell, Josep G.; Ciais, Philippe; Jackson, Robert B.; Alin, Simone (2020)."Global Carbon Budget 2020"(PDF).Earth System Science Data.12(4): 3269–3340.Bibcode:2020ESSD...12.3269F.doi:10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020.ISSN1866-3516.
  87. ^"Global Carbon Budget 2019 | ICOS".www.icos-cp.eu.
  88. ^Raupach, M.R.; et al. (2007)."Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2emissions "(PDF).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.104(24): 10288–93.Bibcode:2007PNAS..10410288R.doi:10.1073/pnas.0700609104.PMC1876160.PMID17519334.
  89. ^The cited paper uses the term "start date" instead of "base year".
  90. ^Kühne, Kjell; Bartsch, Nils; Tate, Ryan Driskell; Higson, Julia; Habet, André (2022).""Carbon Bombs" - Mapping key fossil fuel projects "(PDF).Energy Policy.166:112950.Bibcode:2022EnPol.16612950K.doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950.S2CID248756651.
  91. ^"Global Carbon Budget - Latest Data".Global Carbon Project.Retrieved2023-06-18.
  92. ^Olivier J.G.J. (2022),Trends in global CO2and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2021 summary reportArchived2023-03-08 at theWayback Machine.PBL Netherlands, Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  93. ^IGSD (2013)."Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs)".Institute of Governance and Sustainable Development (IGSD).Retrieved29 November2019.[permanent dead link]
  94. ^Zaelke, Durwood; Borgford-Parnell, Nathan; Andersen, Stephen; Picolotti, Romina; Clare, Dennis; Sun, Xiaopu; Gabrielle, Danielle (2013)."Primer on Short-Lived Climate Pollutants"(PDF).Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. p. 3.
  95. ^using 100 yearglobal warming potentialfrom IPCC-AR4
  96. ^Dreyfus, Gabrielle B.; Xu, Yangyang; Shindell, Drew T.; Zaelke, Durwood; Ramanathan, Veerabhadran (31 May 2022)."Mitigating climate disruption in time: A self-consistent approach for avoiding both near-term and long-term global warming".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.119(22): e2123536119.Bibcode:2022PNAS..11923536D.doi:10.1073/pnas.2123536119.ISSN0027-8424.PMC9295773.PMID35605122.S2CID249014617.
  97. ^abcdefghijOlivier J.G.J. and Peters J.A.H.W. (2020),Trends in global CO2and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 reportArchived2022-04-02 at theWayback Machine.PBL NetherlandsArchived2021-09-09 at theWayback MachineEnvironmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  98. ^Lombrana, Laura Millan; Warren, Hayley; Rathi, Akshat (2020)."Measuring the Carbon-Dioxide Cost of Last Year's Worldwide Wildfires".Bloomberg L.P.
  99. ^Global fire annual emissions(PDF)(Report). Global Fire Emissions Database.
  100. ^World Meteorological Organization (January 2019)."Scientific Assessment of ozone Depletion: 2018"(PDF).Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project.58:A3 (see Table A1).
  101. ^Thompson, R.L; Lassaletta, L.; Patra, P.K (2019)."Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.9(12). et al.: 993–998.Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..993T.doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0613-7.S2CID208302708.
  102. ^"Hydrogen 'twice as powerful a greenhouse gas as previously thought': UK government study".8 April 2022.Retrieved3 March2023.
  103. ^Ocko, Illisa; Hamburg, Steven (20 July 2022)."Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions"(PDF).Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.22(14): 9349–9368.Bibcode:2022ACP....22.9349O.doi:10.5194/acp-22-9349-2022.S2CID250930654.Retrieved25 April2023.
  104. ^Cooper, Jasmin; Dubey, Luke; Bakkaloglu, Semra; Hawkes, Adam (2022-07-15)."Hydrogen emissions from the hydrogen value chain-emissions profile and impact to global warming".Science of the Total Environment.830:154624.Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83054624C.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154624.hdl:10044/1/96970.ISSN0048-9697.PMID35307429.S2CID247535630.
  105. ^Bond; et al. (2013)."Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment".J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.118(11): 5380–5552.Bibcode:2013JGRD..118.5380B.doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171.hdl:2027.42/99106.
  106. ^Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. (April 2008). "Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon".Nature Geoscience.1(4): 221–227.Bibcode:2008NatGe...1..221R.doi:10.1038/ngeo156.
  107. ^"Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector".EarthCharts.6 March 2020.Retrieved15 March2020.
  108. ^abc"Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options | UNECE".unece.org.Retrieved2021-11-26.
  109. ^IEA, CO2Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.98
  110. ^IEA, CO2Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.101
  111. ^"Emissions".www.iea.org.Archived fromthe originalon 12 August 2019.Retrieved21 September2019.
  112. ^"We have too many fossil-fuel power plants to meet climate goals".Environment.1 July 2019. Archived fromthe originalon July 2, 2019.Retrieved21 September2019.
  113. ^"March: Tracking the decoupling of electricity demand and associated CO2emissions ".www.iea.org.Retrieved21 September2019.
  114. ^Grant, Don; Zelinka, David; Mitova, Stefania (13 July 2021)."Reducing CO2emissions by targeting the world's hyper-polluting power plants ".Environmental Research Letters.16(9): 094022.Bibcode:2021ERL....16i4022G.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac13f1.ISSN1748-9326.
  115. ^Emission Trends and Drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change"https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/Archived2022-08-02 at theWayback Machine
  116. ^Nabuurs, G-J.; Mrabet, R.; Abu Hatab, A.; Bustamante, M.; et al."Chapter 7: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU)"(PDF).Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change.p. 750.doi:10.1017/9781009157926.009..
  117. ^Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006).Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options(PDF).Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.ISBN978-92-5-105571-7.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 25 June 2008.
  118. ^FAO (2020).Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018(PDF)(Report). FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series. Vol. 18. Rome. p. 2.ISSN2709-0078.
  119. ^Section 4.2: Agriculture's current contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, in:HLPE (June 2012).Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security.Rome, Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.pp. 67–69. Archived fromthe originalon 12 December 2014.
  120. ^Sarkodie, Samuel A.; Ntiamoah, Evans B.; Li, Dongmei (2019)."Panel heterogeneous distribution analysis of trade and modernized agriculture on CO2emissions: The role of renewable and fossil fuel energy consumption ".Natural Resources Forum.43(3): 135–153.doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12183.ISSN1477-8947.
  121. ^"Carbon emissions from fertilizers could be reduced by as much as 80% by 2050".Science Daily.University of Cambridge.Retrieved17 February2023.
  122. ^"How livestock farming affects the environment".www.downtoearth.org.in.Retrieved2022-02-10.
  123. ^Friel, Sharon; Dangour, Alan D.; Garnett, Tara; et al. (2009). "Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture".The Lancet.374(9706): 2016–2025.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61753-0.PMID19942280.S2CID6318195.
  124. ^"The carbon footprint of foods: are differences explained by the impacts of methane?".Our World in Data.Retrieved2023-04-14.
  125. ^United Nations Environment Programme (2022).Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies.Nairobi.
  126. ^"Bovine Genomics | Genome Canada".www.genomecanada.ca.Archived fromthe originalon 10 August 2019.Retrieved2 August2019.
  127. ^Airhart, Ellen."Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy".Wired– via www.wired.com.
  128. ^"The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review".
  129. ^Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). "Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach".Frontiers in Life Science.8(4): 371–378.doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550.S2CID89217740.
  130. ^"Kowbucha, seaweed, vaccines: the race to reduce cows' methane emissions".The Guardian.30 September 2021.Retrieved1 December2021.
  131. ^Boadi, D (2004)."Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review".Can. J. Anim. Sci.84(3): 319–335.doi:10.4141/a03-109.
  132. ^Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale.Animal4: pp 351-365.
  133. ^Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). "Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review".Livestock Science.130(1–3): 47–56.doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
  134. ^abFeng, Yu; Zeng, Zhenzhong; Searchinger, Timothy D.; Ziegler, Alan D.; Wu, Jie; Wang, Dashan; He, Xinyue; Elsen, Paul R.; Ciais, Philippe; Xu, Rongrong; Guo, Zhilin; Peng, Liqing; Tao, Yiheng; Spracklen, Dominick V.; Holden, Joseph; Liu, Xiaoping; Zheng, Yi; Xu, Peng; Chen, Ji; Jiang, Xin; Song, Xiao-Peng; Lakshmi, Venkataraman; Wood, Eric F.; Zheng, Chunmiao (28 February 2022)."Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century"(PDF).Nature Sustainability.5(5): 444–451.Bibcode:2022NatSu...5..444F.doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00854-3.ISSN2398-9629.S2CID247160560.
  135. ^"Deforestation emissions far higher than previously thought, study finds".The Guardian.28 February 2022.Retrieved16 March2022.
  136. ^Fig. SPM.2c fromWorking Group III (4 April 2022).Climate Change 2022 / Mitigation of Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers(PDF).Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 10.ISBN978-92-9169-160-9.Archived(PDF)from the original on 22 July 2023.{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help)GDP data is for 2019.
  137. ^B. Metz; O.R. Davidson; P.R. Bosch; R. Dave; L.A. Meyer (eds.),Annex I: Glossary J–P,archived fromthe originalon 3 May 2010
  138. ^Markandya, A. (2001)."7.3.5 Cost Implications of Alternative GHG Emission Reduction Options and Carbon Sinks".In B. Metz; et al. (eds.).Costing Methodologies.Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. This version: GRID-Arendal website.ISBN978-0521015028.Archived fromthe originalon 5 August 2011.Retrieved11 April2011.
  139. ^Page, S.; Siegert, F.; Rieley, J.; Boehm, H.; Jaya, A.; Limin, S. (2002). "The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997".Nature.420(6911): 61–65.Bibcode:2002Natur.420...61P.doi:10.1038/nature01131.PMID12422213.S2CID4379529.
  140. ^Lazaroff, Cat (2002-11-08)."Indonesian Wildfires Accelerated Global Warming".Environment New Service.Archived fromthe originalon 8 September 2019.Retrieved2011-11-07.
  141. ^Pearce, Fred (6 November 2004)."Massive peat burn is speeding climate change".New Scientist.
  142. ^Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (6 February 2020)."4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors".World Resources Institute.Retrieved30 December2020.
  143. ^"Cars, planes, trains: where do CO2emissions from transport come from? ".Our World in Data.Retrieved19 June2021.
  144. ^"EU countries agree to 30 percent cut in truck CO2emissions ".Reuters.20 December 2018.
  145. ^Walker TR, Adebambo O, Del Aguila Feijoo MC, Elhaimer E, Hossain T, Edwards SJ, Morrison CE, Romo J, Sharma N, Taylor S, Zomorodi S (2019). "Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation".World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation.pp. 505–530.doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00030-9.ISBN978-0-12-805052-1.S2CID135422637.
  146. ^Vidal, John (2009-04-09)."Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'".The Guardian.Retrieved2009-07-03.
  147. ^"Infrastructure Podcast; Decarbonized Shipping".World Bank. 2022-03-16.Retrieved2022-08-18.
  148. ^Kersing, Arjen; Stone, Matt (2022-01-25)."Charting global shipping's path to zero carbon".McKinsey.Retrieved2022-08-18.
  149. ^Raucci, Carlo (2019-06-06)."Three pathways to shipping's decarbonization".Global Maritime Forum.Retrieved2022-08-18.
  150. ^Brandon Graver; Kevin Zhang; Dan Rutherford (September 2019)."CO2emissions from commercial aviation, 2018 "(PDF).International Council on Clean Transportation.
  151. ^Davidson, Jordan (4 September 2020)."Aviation Accounts for 3.5% of Global Warming Caused by Humans, New Research Says".Ecowatch.Retrieved6 September2020.
  152. ^"Average passenger aircraft emissions and energy consumption per passenger kilometre in Finland 2008".lipasto.vtt.fi.Archivedfrom the original on 19 July 2011.Retrieved3 July2009.
  153. ^abÜrge-Vorsatz, Diana; Khosla, Radhika; Bernhardt, Rob; Chan, Yi Chieh; Vérez, David; Hu, Shan; Cabeza, Luisa F. (2020)."Advances Toward a Net-Zero Global Building Sector".Annual Review of Environment and Resources.45:227–269.doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045843.hdl:10459.1/69710.
  154. ^"Why the building sector?".Architecture 2020.Retrieved1 April2021.
  155. ^Fowlie, Meredith; Greenstone, Michael; Wolfram, Catherine (2018-08-01)."Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program".The Quarterly Journal of Economics.133(3): 1597–1644.doi:10.1093/qje/qjy005.ISSN0033-5533.Archivedfrom the original on 2020-06-07.Retrieved2020-11-21.
  156. ^"Sequestering Carbon in Buildings".Green Energy Times.23 June 2017.Retrieved22 January2021.
  157. ^"IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change".Retrieved4 April2022.
  158. ^abcdInternational Energy Agency(2019).Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2019.Paris: IEA.ISBN978-92-807-3768-4.Archivedfrom the original on 2020-11-26.Retrieved2020-11-20.
  159. ^"CoatingsTech - Coatings and Low-carbon Cement Technology".www.coatingstech-digital.org.Retrieved2022-07-07.
  160. ^De Ras, Kevin; Van De Vijver, Ruben; Galvita, Vladimir V.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (2019-12-01)."Carbon capture and utilization in the steel industry: challenges and opportunities for chemical engineering".Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.26:81–87.Bibcode:2019COCE...26...81D.doi:10.1016/j.coche.2019.09.001.hdl:1854/LU-8635595.ISSN2211-3398.S2CID210619173.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-05-20.Retrieved2021-07-02.
  161. ^Alter, Lloyd (1 April 2019)."Let's rename" Embodied Carbon "to" Upfront Carbon Emissions "".TreeHugger.Archivedfrom the original on 1 April 2019.Retrieved10 August2019.
  162. ^"New Buildings: Embodied Carbon".Architecture 2030.Archivedfrom the original on 12 December 2018.Retrieved10 August2019.
  163. ^Pomponi, Francesco; Moncaster, Alice (2016)."Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say?".Journal of Environmental Management.181:687–700.Bibcode:2016JEnvM.181..687P.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036.PMID27558830.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-11-20.Retrieved2021-07-27.
  164. ^"The World's Biggest Emitter of Greenhouse Gases".Bloomberg.com.17 March 2020.Retrieved29 December2020.
  165. ^Global, Regional, and National CO2EmissionsArchived2007-07-11 at theWayback Machine.InTrends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change,Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres, 2005, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  166. ^"Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR)".worldbank.org.TheWorld Bank.Archivedfrom the original on August 26, 2016.RetrievedAugust 24,2016.previous redirect from web.worldbank.org
  167. ^Tsaia, I-Tsung; Al Alia, Meshayel; El Waddi, Sanaâ; Adnan Zarzourb, aOthman (2013)."Carbon Capture Regulation for The Steel and Aluminum Industries in the UAE: An Empirical Analysis".Energy Procedia.37:7732–7740.Bibcode:2013EnPro..37.7732T.doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.719.ISSN1876-6102.OCLC5570078737.
  168. ^Zheng, Jiajia; Suh, Sangwon (May 2019)."Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.9(5): 374–378.Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..374Z.doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z.ISSN1758-6798.S2CID145873387.
  169. ^"The Link Between Plastic Use and Climate Change: Nitty-gritty".stanfordmag.org.2009.Retrieved5 March2021.... According to the EPA, approximately one ounce of carbon dioxide is emitted for each ounce of polyethylene (PET) produced. PET is the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles....'
  170. ^Glazner, Elizabeth (21 November 2017)."Plastic Pollution and Climate Change".Plastic Pollution Coalition.Retrieved6 August2018.
  171. ^Blue, Marie-Luise."What Is the Carbon Footprint of a Plastic Bottle?".Sciencing.Leaf Group Ltd.Retrieved6 August2018.
  172. ^Royer, Sarah-Jeanne; Ferrón, Sara; Wilson, Samuel T.; Karl, David M. (1 August 2018)."Production of methane and ethylene from plastics in the environment".PLOS ONE.13(Plastic, Climate Change): e0200574.Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1300574R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200574.PMC6070199.PMID30067755.
  173. ^Rosane, Olivia (2 August 2018)."Study Finds New Reason to Ban Plastic: It Emits Methane in the Sun".No. Plastic, Climate Change. Ecowatch.Retrieved6 August2018.
  174. ^"Sweeping New Report on Global Environmental Impact of Plastics Reveals Severe Damage to Climate".Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).Retrieved16 May2019.
  175. ^Plastic & Climate The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet(PDF).Center for International Environmental Law, Environmental Integrity Project, FracTracker Alliance, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, 5 Gyres, and Break Free From Plastic. May 2019. pp. 82–85.Retrieved20 May2019.
  176. ^"World GHG Emissions Flow Chart"(PDF).Ecofys.com.2010. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 6 November 2018.Retrieved16 August2018.
  177. ^"Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks – Analysis".IEA.Retrieved2022-03-06.
  178. ^Freitag, Charlotte; Berners-Lee, Mike (December 2020). "The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations".arXiv:2102.02622[physics.soc-ph].
  179. ^"The computer chip industry has a dirty climate secret".the Guardian.18 September 2021.Retrieved18 September2021.
  180. ^"Working from home is erasing carbon emissions -- but for how long?".Grist.19 May 2020.Retrieved4 April2021.
  181. ^Cunliff, Colin (6 July 2020)."Beyond the Energy Techlash: The Real Climate Impacts of Information Technology".
  182. ^Foteinis, Spyros (7 February 2018)."Bitcoin's alarming carbon footprint".Nature.554(7691): 169.Bibcode:2018Natur.554..169F.doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01625-x.
  183. ^Krause, Max J.; Tolaymat, Thabet (November 2018). "Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies".Nature Sustainability.1(11): 711–718.Bibcode:2018NatSu...1..711K.doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7.S2CID169170289.
  184. ^Davies, Pascale (26 February 2022)."Bitcoin mining is worse for the environment now since China banned it".euronews.Retrieved1 March2022.
  185. ^Ponciano, Jonathan."Bill Gates Sounds Alarm On Bitcoin's Energy Consumption–Here's Why Crypto Is Bad For Climate Change".Forbes.Retrieved30 July2021.
  186. ^Huang, Jon;O'Neill, Claire; Tabuchi, Hiroko (3 September 2021)."Bitcoin Uses More Electricity Than Many Countries. How Is That Possible?".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.Retrieved1 March2022.
  187. ^"Bitcoin energy consumption worldwide 2017-2021".Statista.Retrieved1 March2022.
  188. ^Andrae, Anders; Edler, Tomas (2015)."On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030".Challenges.6(1): 117–157.doi:10.3390/challe6010117.ISSN2078-1547.Text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  189. ^J. Eckelman, Matthew; Huang, Kaixin; Dubrow, Robert; D. Sherman, Jodi (December 2020)."Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage In The United States: An Update".Health Affairs.39(12): 2071–2079.doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247.PMID33284703.
  190. ^Eckelman, Matthew J.; Sherman, Jodi D. (April 2018)."Estimated Global Disease Burden From US Health Care Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions".American Journal of Public Health.108(S2): S120–S122.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303846.ISSN0090-0036.PMC5922190.PMID29072942.
  191. ^Howard, Guy; Calow, Roger; Macdonald, Alan; Bartram, Jamie (2016)."Climate Change and Water and Sanitation: Likely Impacts and Emerging Trends for Action".Annual Review of Environment and Resources.41(1): 253–276.doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085856.ISSN1543-5938.S2CID155259589.
  192. ^abcdAlix, Alexandre; Bellet, Laurent; Trommsdorff, Corinne; Audureau, Iris, eds. (2022).Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Water and Sanitation Services: Overview of emissions and their potential reduction illustrated by utility know-how.IWA Publishing.doi:10.2166/9781789063172.ISBN978-1-78906-317-2.S2CID250128707.
  193. ^"Environmental Impacts of Tourism – Global Level".UNEP.
  194. ^"IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology - specific cost and performance parameters - Table A.III.2 (Emissions of selected electricity supply technologies (gCO 2eq/kWh))"(PDF).IPCC. 2014. p. 1335.Archived(PDF)from the original on 14 December 2018.Retrieved14 December2018.
  195. ^"Full lifecycle emissions intensity of global coal and gas supply for heat generation, 2018 – Charts – Data & Statistics".IEA.Archivedfrom the original on 24 June 2020.Retrieved2020-07-30.
  196. ^Nuclear Power Results – Life Cycle Assessment HarmonizationArchived2 July 2013 at theWayback Machine,NREL Laboratory, Alliance For Sustainable Energy LLC website, U.S. Department Of Energy, last updated: 24 January 2013.
  197. ^Climate Equality: a Climate for the 99%(PDF).Oxfam International. November 2023.Archived(PDF)from the original on 23 November 2023.Fig. ES.2, Fig. ES.3, Box 1.2.
  198. ^abCozzi, Laura; Chen, Olivia; Kim, Hyeji (22 February 2023)."The world's top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO2than the bottom 1% ".iea.org.International Energy Agency (IEA).Archivedfrom the original on 3 March 2023."Methodological note:... The analysis accounts for energy-related CO2, and not other greenhouse gases, nor those related to land use and agriculture."
  199. ^Stevens, Harry (1 March 2023)."The United States has caused the most global warming. When will China pass it?".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 1 March 2023.
  200. ^Rapid Transition Alliance, 13 April 2021"Cambridge Sustainability Commission Report on Scaling Behaviour Change"Archived2022-02-05 at theWayback Machinep. 20
  201. ^Emission trends and drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change".http://www.ipcc.ch.Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  202. ^abClimate Change 2022ipcc.chArchived4 April 2022 at theWayback Machine
  203. ^Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (19 June 2020)."Scientists' warning on affluence".Nature Communications.11(1): 3107.Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.ISSN2041-1723.PMC7305220.PMID32561753.
  204. ^Nielsen, Kristian S.; Nicholas, Kimberly A.;Creutzig, Felix;Dietz, Thomas; Stern, Paul C. (30 September 2021)."The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions".Nature Energy.6(11): 1011–1016.Bibcode:2021NatEn...6.1011N.doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y.ISSN2058-7546.S2CID244191460.
  205. ^Gore, Tim (2020-09-23)."Confronting carbon inequality".Oxfam International.Archivedfrom the original on 24 March 2022.Retrieved2022-03-20.
  206. ^Kartha, Sivan; Kemp-Benedict, Eric; Ghosh, Emily; Nazareth, Anisha; Gore, Tim (September 2020)."The Carbon Inequality Era: An assessment of the global distribution of consumption emissions among individuals from 1990 to 2015 and beyond"(PDF).Stockholm Environment Institute.Archived(PDF)from the original on 22 January 2022.Retrieved11 May2022.
  207. ^Clifford, Catherine (26 January 2021)."The '1%' are the main drivers of climate change, but it hits the poor the hardest: Oxfam report".CNBC.Archivedfrom the original on 28 October 2021.Retrieved28 October2021.
  208. ^Berkhout, Esmé; Galasso, Nick; Lawson, Max; Rivero Morales, Pablo Andrés; Taneja, Anjela; Vázquez Pimentel, Diego Alejo (25 January 2021)."The Inequality Virus".Oxfam International.Archivedfrom the original on 28 October 2021.Retrieved28 October2021.
  209. ^"Emissions Gap Report 2020 / Executive Summary"(PDF).United Nations Environment Programme.2021. p. XV Fig. ES.8.Archived(PDF)from the original on 31 July 2021.
  210. ^Paddison, Laura (28 October 2021)."How the rich are driving climate change".BBC.Archivedfrom the original on 5 November 2021.Retrieved7 November2021.
  211. ^Oswald, Yannick; Owen, Anne; Steinberger, Julia K. (March 2020)."Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories"(PDF).Nature Energy.5(3): 231–239.Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..231O.doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8.ISSN2058-7546.S2CID216245301.Archived(PDF)from the original on 28 October 2021.Retrieved16 November2021.
  212. ^Timperley, Jocelyn."Who is really to blame for climate change?".www.bbc.com.Retrieved8 June2022.
  213. ^Zheng, Heran; Long, Yin; Wood, Richard; Moran, Daniel; Zhang, Zengkai; Meng, Jing; Feng, Kuishuang; Hertwich, Edgar; Guan, Dabo (March 2022)."Ageing society in developed countries challenges carbon mitigation".Nature Climate Change.12(3): 241–248.Bibcode:2022NatCC..12..241Z.doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01302-y.hdl:11250/3027882.ISSN1758-6798.S2CID247322718.
  214. ^ Compilation and synthesis of fifth national communications. Executive summary. Note by the secretariat(PDF).Geneva (Switzerland):United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC). 2011. pp. 9–10.
  215. ^"Can cost benefit analysis grasp the climate change nettle? And can we..."Oxford Martin School.Retrieved11 November2019.
  216. ^Kotz, Mazimilian.; Levermann, Anders; Wenz, Leonie (2024-04-17)."The economic commitment of climate change".Nature.628:551–557.doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07219-0.PMC11023931.
  217. ^Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (11 May 2020)."CO2and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ".Our World in Data.Retrieved27 August2022.
  218. ^Rogelj, J.; Shindell, D.; Jiang, K.; Fifta, S.; et al. (2018)."Chapter 2: Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5 °C in the Context of Sustainable Development"(PDF).Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty(PDF).
  219. ^Harvey, Fiona (26 November 2019)."UN calls for push to cut greenhouse gas levels to avoid climate chaos".The Guardian.Retrieved27 November2019.
  220. ^"Cut Global Emissions by 7.6 Percent Every Year for Next Decade to Meet 1.5°C Paris Target – UN Report".United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.United Nations.Retrieved27 November2019.
  221. ^IPCC (2022)Summary for policy makersinClimate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, United States
  222. ^Ram M., Bogdanov D., Aghahosseini A., Gulagi A., Oyewo A.S., Child M., Caldera U., Sadovskaia K., Farfan J., Barbosa LSNS., Fasihi M., Khalili S., Dalheimer B., Gruber G., Traber T., De Caluwe F., Fell H.-J., Breyer C.Global Energy System based on 100% Renewable Energy – Power, Heat, Transport and Desalination SectorsArchived2021-04-01 at theWayback Machine.Study by Lappeenranta University of Technology and Energy Watch Group, Lappeenranta, Berlin, March 2019.
  223. ^"Cement – Analysis".IEA.Retrieved24 November2022.
  224. ^ab EIA (October 2023).International Energy Outlook 2023(PDF).Washington DC, USA: US Energy Information Administration (EIA).Retrieved2023-10-11.Informally describes as a "narrative" and tagged IEO2023.
  225. ^ EIA (11 October 2023)."International Energy Outlook 2023 — Landing page".US Energy Information Administration (EIA).Washington DC, USA.Retrieved2023-10-13.Landing page.
  226. ^ CSIS (11 October 2023).US EIA's International Energy Outlook 2023.Washington DC, USA: Center for Strategic and International Studies (SCIS).Retrieved2023-10-13.YouTube. Duration: 00:57:12. Includes interview withJoseph DeCarolis.
  227. ^abUnited Nations Environment Programme (2022).Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies.Nairobi.
  228. ^"It's over for fossil fuels: IPCC spells out what's needed to avert climate disaster".The Guardian.4 April 2022.Retrieved4 April2022.
  229. ^"The evidence is clear: the time for action is now. We can halve emissions by 2030".IPCC.4 April 2022.Retrieved4 April2022.
  230. ^"Ambitious Action Key to Resolving Triple Planetary Crisis of Climate Disruption, Nature Loss, Pollution, Secretary-General Says in Message for International Mother Earth Day | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases".www.un.org.Retrieved10 June2022.
  231. ^ab"Fossil CO2emissions of all world countries - 2020 report ".EDGAR - Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research.This article incorporatestextavailable under theCC BY 4.0license.
  232. ^"Climate Change Indicators: U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions / Figure 3. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions per Capita and per Dollar of GDP, 1990–2020".EPA.gov.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 27 June 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 5 April 2023.
  233. ^US EPA, OAR (2017-02-08)."Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks".www.epa.gov.Retrieved2022-08-04.
  234. ^"Report: China emissions exceed all developed nations combined".BBC News.2021-05-07.
  235. ^"Cumulative CO2emissions globally by country 2018 ".Statista.Retrieved2021-02-19.
  236. ^"The world is still falling short of meeting its climate goals".Environment.2021-10-26. Archived fromthe originalon October 26, 2021.Retrieved2021-10-28.
  237. ^"Who has contributed most to global CO2emissions? ".Our World in Data.Retrieved2021-12-29.
  238. ^Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (2020-02-06)."4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors".World Resources Institute.Retrieved2020-04-29.
  239. ^"Historical GHG Emissions / Global Historical Emissions".ClimateWatchData.org.Climate Watch.Archivedfrom the original on 21 May 2021.● Population data from"List of the populations of the world's countries, dependencies, and territories".britannica.com.Encyclopedia Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on 26 June 2021.
  240. ^Chart based on:Milman, Oliver (12 July 2022)."Nearly $2tn of damage inflicted on other countries by US emissions".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 12 July 2022.GuardiancitesCallahan, Christopher W.; Mankin, Justin S. (12 July 2022)."National attribution of historical climate damages".Climatic Change.172(40): 40.Bibcode:2022ClCh..172...40C.doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03387-y.S2CID250430339.
  241. ^"Toàn cầu ôn thất khí thể bài phóng sổ cư ( tối tân bản ) _ trung quốc thán bài phóng giao dịch võng".www.tanpaifang.com.Archivedfrom the original on 2018-04-10.Retrieved2018-04-10.
  242. ^"Analysis: China's carbon emissions grow at fastest rate for more than a decade".Carbon Brief.2021-05-20.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-07-27.Retrieved2021-07-07.
  243. ^"Preliminary 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimates for China".Rhodium Group.4 March 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-06-23.Retrieved2021-04-25.
  244. ^"China's Emissions Now Exceed All the Developed World's Combined".Bloomberg News.6 May 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-11-01.Retrieved2021-11-01.
  245. ^"CO2Emissions: China - 2020 ".Climate TRACE.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-11-12.Retrieved2021-09-27.
  246. ^Larsen, Kate; Pitt, Hannah (6 May 2021)."China's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Exceeded the Developed World for the First Time in 2019".Rhodium Group.Archivedfrom the original on 17 June 2021.Retrieved1 November2021.
  247. ^Watts, Jonathan (2024-04-03)."Just 57 companies linked to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions since 2016".The Guardian.ISSN0261-3077.Archivedfrom the original on 2024-06-02.Retrieved2024-04-04.
  248. ^"The Carbon Brief Profile: India".Carbon Brief.2019-03-14.Retrieved2019-09-25.
  249. ^Government of India (2018)India Second Biennial Update Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
  250. ^ab"India: Third Biennial Update Report to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 2021-02-27.
  251. ^"By 2030, Cut Per Capita Emission to Global Average: India to G20".The Leading Solar Magazine In India.26 July 2021.Retrieved2021-09-17.
  252. ^"Greenhouse Gas Emissions in India"(PDF).September 2018.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2020-02-14.Retrieved10 June2021.
  253. ^"Emissions Gap Report 2019".UN Environment Programme.2019.Archivedfrom the original on 2019-11-20.Retrieved10 June2021.
  254. ^abTollefson J (January 2021). "COVID curbed carbon emissions in 2020 - but not by much".Nature.589(7842): 343.Bibcode:2021Natur.589..343T.doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00090-3.PMID33452515.S2CID231622354.
  255. ^Forster PM, Forster HI, Evans MJ, Gidden MJ, Jones CD, Keller CA, et al. (August 2020)."Erratum: Publisher Correction: Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19".Nature Climate Change.10(10): 971.doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0904-z.PMC7427494.PMID32845944.
  256. ^Rume T, Islam SM (September 2020)."Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability".Heliyon.6(9): e04965.Bibcode:2020Heliy...604965R.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965.PMC7498239.PMID32964165.
  257. ^Forster PM, Forster HI, Evans MJ, Gidden MJ, Jones CD, Keller CA, et al. (7 August 2020)."Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.10(10): 913–919.Bibcode:2020NatCC..10..913F.doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0.ISSN1758-6798.
  258. ^"CO2 Emissions in 2023 – Analysis".IEA.March 2024.Retrieved2024-03-22.
edit