Cities of the Philippines

Acity(Filipino:lungsodorsiyudad) is one of the units oflocal government in the Philippines.All Philippine cities are chartered cities (Filipino:nakakartang lungsod), whose existence as corporate and administrative entities is governed by their own specificmunicipal chartersin addition to theLocal Government Codeof 1991, which specifies their administrative structure and powers. As of July 8, 2023, there are 149 cities.

Cities of the Philippines
Highly urbanized cities Independent component cities Component cities Municipalities
Category	City(Local government unit)
Location	Philippines
Number	149 (as of 2023)
Possible status	Highly urbanized city Independent component city Component city
Populations	45,383 (Palayan) – 2,960,048 (Quezon City)
Areas	5.95 km2(2.30 sq mi) (San Juan) – 2,443.61 km2(943.48 sq mi) (Davao City)
Subdivisions	Barangays

A city is entitled to at least one representative in theHouse of Representativesif its population reaches 250,000. Cities are allowed to use a common seal. As corporate entities, cities have the power to take, purchase, receive, hold, lease, convey, and dispose of real and personal property for their general interests; condemn private property for public use (eminent domain); contract and be contracted with; sue; and exercise all powers conferred on them by Congress. Only anact of Congresscan create or amend a city charter, and through this charter,Congressconfers on a city certain powers that regular municipalities or even other cities may not have.

Despite differences in the powers accorded to each city, all cities, regardless of status, are given a larger share of theInternal Revenue Allotment(IRA) compared to regular municipalities,and are generally more autonomous than regular municipalities.

Government

Main article:Sangguniang Panlungsod

A city's local government is headed by a mayor elected by popular vote. The vice mayor serves as the presiding officer of theSangguniang Panlungsod(city council), which serves as the city's legislative body. Upon receiving their charters, cities also receive a full complement of executive departments to better serve their constituents. Some departments are established on a case-by-case basis, depending on the needs of the city.

Offices and officials common to all cities

Office	Head	Mandatory / Optional
City Government	Mayor	Mandatory
Sangguniang Panlungsod (City Council)	Vice Mayor as presiding officer	Mandatory
Office of the Secretary to the Sanggunian	Secretary to the Sanggunian	Mandatory
Treasury Office	Treasurer	Mandatory
Assessor's Office	Assessor	Mandatory
Accounting and Internal Audit Services	Accountant	Mandatory
Budget Office	Budget Officer	Mandatory
Planning and Development Office	Planning and Development Coordinator	Mandatory
Engineering Office	Engineer	Mandatory
Health Office	Health Officer	Mandatory
Office of Civil Registry	Civil Registrar	Mandatory
Office of the Administrator	Administrator	Mandatory
Office of Legal Services	Legal Officer	Mandatory
Office on Social Welfare and Development Services	Social Welfare and Development Officer	Mandatory
Office on General Services	General Services Officer	Mandatory
Office for Veterinary Services	Veterinarian	Mandatory
Office on Architectural Planning and Design	Architect	Optional
Office on Public Information	Information Officer	Optional
Office for the Development of Cooperatives	Cooperative Officer	Optional
Office on Population Development	Population Officer	Optional
Office on Environment and Natural Resources	Environment and Natural Resources Office	Optional
Office of Agricultural Services	Agriculturist	Optional

Source: Local Government Code of 1991.

Subdivisions

Cities, likemunicipalities,are composed ofbarangays,which can range from urban neighborhoods (such as Barangay 9, Santa Angela inLaoag), to rural communities (such as Barangay Iwahig inPuerto Princesa). Barangays are sometimes grouped into officially defined administrative (geographical) districts. Examples of such are the cities ofManila(16 districts),Davao(11 districts),Iloilo(seven districts), andSamal(three districts: Babak, Kaputian and Peñaplata). Some cities such asCaloocan,Manila, andPasayeven have an intermediate level between the district and barangay levels, called a zone. However, geographic districts and zones are not political units; there are no elected city government officials in these city-specific administrative levels. Rather, they only serve to make city planning, statistics-gathering, and other administrative tasks easier and more convenient.

Classification

Income classification

Republic Act No. 11964, or the Automatic Income Classification of Local Government Units Act, was signed by PresidentBongbong Marcoson October 26, 2023.The law classifies cities into five classes according to their income ranges, based on the average annual regular income for three fiscal years preceding a general income reclassification.The classification are as follows:

Class	Average annual income (₱)
First	>1,300,000,000
Second	1,000,000,000–1,300,000,000
Third	800,000,000–1,000,000,000
Fourth	500,000,000–800,000,000
Fifth	<500,000,000

Legal classification

The Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160) classifies all cities into one of three legal categories:

• Highly urbanized cities (HUC): Cities with a minimum population of two hundred thousand (200,000) inhabitants, as certified by thePhilippine Statistics Authority,and with the latest annual income of at least fifty millionpesos(₱50,000,000 orUSD1,000,000) based on 1991 constant prices, as certified by the city treasurer. However,San Juan Cityin Metro Manila became a highly-urbanized city in 2007 through Republic Act 9388 despite having a population of 126,347 people.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on July 21, 2007, approved the conversion.

There are currently 33 highly urbanized cities in the Philippines, 16 of which are located in Metro Manila.

• Independent component cities (ICC): Cities of this type have charters that explicitly prohibit their residents from voting for provincial officials. All five of them are considered independent from the province in which they are geographically located:Cotabato,Dagupan,Naga(Camarines Sur),Ormoc,andSantiago.
• Component cities (CC): Cities which do not meet the preceding requirements are deemed part of the province in which they are geographically located. If a component city is located along the boundaries of two or more provinces, it is considered part of the province of which it used to be a municipality.

Independent cities

There are 38 independent cities in the Philippines, all of which are classified as either "Highly urbanized" or "Independent component" cities. A city classified as such:

• does not have itsSangguniang Panlungsodlegislation subject to review by any province'sSangguniang Panlalawigan;
• does not share tax revenue with any province; and
• is directly supervised by thePresident of the Philippinesthrough the city government (given that the provincial government no longer exercises supervision over city officials), as stated in Section 29 of the Local Government Code.

Currently, there are only four independent cities in two classes that can still participate in the election of provincial officials (governor, vice governor, andSangguniang Panlalawiganmembers):

• Cities declared highly urbanized between 1987 and 1992, whose charters (as amended) explicitly permitted residents to both vote and run for elective positions in the provincial government, and therefore allowed by Section 452-c of the Local Government Codeto maintain these rights:Lucena(Quezon),Mandaue(Cebu);
• Independent component cities whose charters (as amended) only explicitly allow residents to run for provincial offices:Dagupan(Pangasinan) andNaga(Camarines Sur)

Registered voters of the cities ofCotabato,Ormoc,Santiago,as well as all other highly urbanized cities, including those to be converted or created in the future, cannot participate in provincial elections.

In addition to the eligibility of some independent cities to vote in provincial elections, a few other situations become sources of confusion regarding the complete autonomy of independent cities from provinces:

• Some independent cities still serve as the seat of government for the province in which they are geographically located:Bacolod(Negros Occidental),Cagayan de Oro(Misamis Oriental),Cebu City(Cebu),Iloilo City(Iloilo),Lucena(Quezon),Puerto Princesa(Palawan) andTacloban(Leyte). In such cases, the provincial government, apart from already financing the maintenance of its properties such as provincial government buildings and offices, may also provide the government of the independent city with an annual budget (determined by the province at its discretion) to aid in relieving incidental costs incurred by the city such as road maintenance due to increased vehicular traffic in the vicinity of the provincial government complex. The independent city ofButuanwas the capital and seat of government in the province ofAgusan del NorteuntilCabadbaranbecame the province's capital since 2000.
• Some independent cities are still grouped with their former provinces for the purposes of representation inCongress.While 24 independent cities have their own representative(s) in Congress, some remain part of the congressional representation of the province to which they formerly belonged:Butuan,for example, is still part of the1st congressional district of Agusan del Norte.In cases like this, independent cities that do not vote for provincial officials are excluded fromSangguniang Panlalawigan(provincial council) districts, and the allotment of SP members is adjusted accordingly by theCommission on Elections(COMELEC) with proper consideration of population. For example,Agusan del Norte(being a third income-class province) is entitled to elect eight members to its Sangguniang Panlalawigan, and belongs totwo congressional districts.The seats of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan are not evenly distributed (4–4) between the province's first and second congressional districts because its 1st district containsButuan,an independent city which does not vote for provincial officials. Rather, the seats are distributed 1–7 to account for the small population of the province's 1stSangguniang Panlalawigandistrict (consisting only ofLas Nieves) and the bulk of the province's population being in the second district. On the other hand, the city ofLucena,which is eligible to vote for provincial officials, still forms part of the province of Quezon's 2ndSangguniang Panlalawigandistrict, which is coterminous with the2nd congressional district of Quezon.
• General lack of distinction for independent cities, for practical purposes:Many government agencies, as well as Philippine society in general, still continue to classify many independent cities outside Metro Manila as part of provinces due to historical and cultural ties, especially if these cities were once or currently socio-economic and cultural capitals of the provinces to which they once belonged. Furthermore, most maps of the Philippines showing provincial boundaries almost never separate independent cities from the provinces in which they are geographically located, forcartographicconvenience. Despite being first-level administrative divisions (i.e., on the same level as provinces, as stated in Section 25 of the LGC),independent cities are still treated by many to be on the same level as municipalities and component cities (second-level administrative divisions) for educational convenience and simplicity.

A component city, while enjoying relative autonomy on some matters compared to a regular municipality, is still considered part of a province. However, there are several sources of confusion:

• Some component cities form their own congressional representation, separate from their province.The representation of a city in theHouse of Representatives(or lack thereof) is not a criterion for independence from a province, as Congress is the national legislative body and is part of the national (central) government. DespiteAntipolo,BiñanandSan Jose del Montehaving their own representatives in Congress, they are still component cities ofRizal,Laguna,andBulacan,respectively, as their respective charters specifically converted them into component cities and have no provision stating a severance in relations with their respective provincial governments.
• Being part of an administrative region different from the province:Isabela Cityfunctions as a component city ofBasilan:its tax revenues are shared with the provincial government, its residents are eligible to both vote and run for provincial offices, and it is served by the provincial government and the Sangguniang Panlalawigan ofBasilanwith regard to provincially devolved services. However, by opting out of joining theBangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao(BARMM), Isabela City's residents are ineligible to vote and run forregionaloffices of theBangsamoro Parliament,unlike the rest of Basilan. Regional services provided to Isabela City come from offices in Region IX based inPagadian;the rest of Basilan is serviced by the BARMM based in Cotabato City. Isabela City, while not independent from its province, is this outside the jurisdiction of the BARMM, the region to which the rest of Basilan belongs. Regions are not the primary subnational administrative divisions of the Philippines, but rather theprovinces.

Creation of cities

Congress is the lone legislative entity that can incorporate cities.Provincialandmunicipal councilscan pass resolutions indicating a desire to have a certain area (usually an already-existing municipality or a cluster of barangays) declared a city after the requirements for becoming a city are met. As per Republic Act No. 9009, these requirements include:

• locally generated income of at least₱100 million (based on constant prices in the year 2000) for the last two consecutive years, as certified by the Department of Finance,and
• a population of at least 150,000, as certified by thePhilippine Statistics Authority(PSA),ora contiguous territory of 100 square kilometers, as certified by theLand Management Bureau,with contiguity not being a requisite for areas that are on two or moreislands.

Republic Act No. 11683 further amended Section 450 of the Local Government Code in 2022,exempting a municipality qualified for cityhood from the land or population threshold if the municipality has a locally generated average annual income of 400 million pesos for the previous 2 years according to 2012 constant prices, though this amount "shall be increased by five percent" for every three years after the law's effectivity.

Members of Congress (usually the involving representative of the congressional district to which the proposed city belongs) then draft the legislation that will convert or create the city. After the bill passes through both the House of Representatives and theSenateand becomes an Act of Congress, thePresidentsigns the Act into law. If the Act goes unsigned after 30 days it still becomes law despite the absence of the President's signature.

The creation of cities before 1983 was solely at the discretion of the national legislature; there were no requirements for achieving 'city' status other than an approved city charter. No income, population or land area requirements had to be met to incorporate cities beforeBatas Pambansa Bilang 337(Local Government Code of 1983) became law. This is what made it possible for several current cities such asTanguborCanlaonto be conferred such a status despite their small population and locally generated income, which do not meet current standards. The relatively low income standard between 1992 and 2001 (which was₱20 million)also allowed several municipalities, such asSipalayandMuñoz,to become cities despite not being able to meet the current₱100 million local income standard.

Before 1987, many cities were created without any plebiscites conducted for the residents to ratify the city charter, most notable of which were cities that were incorporated during the early American colonial period (ManilaandBaguio), and during theCommonwealth Era (1935–1946)such asCavite City,Dansalan (nowMarawi),Iloilo City,Bacolod,San PabloandZamboanga City.Only since 1987 has it been mandated under theConstitutionthat any change to the legal status of any local government unit requires the ratification by the residents that would be affected by such changes. Therefore, all cities created after 1987 – after meeting the requirements for cityhood as laid out in the Local Government Code of 1991 and Republic Act No. 9009 of 2001 – only acquired their corporate status after the majority of their voting residents approved their respective charters.

Motivations for cityhood

Although some early cities were given charters because of their advantageous (Baguio,Tagaytay) or strategic (Angeles CityandOlongapo,Cotabato,Zamboanga) locations or to especially establish new government centers in otherwise sparsely populated areas (Palayan,Trece Martires,Quezon City), most Philippine cities were originally incorporated to provide a form of localized civil government to an area that is primarily urban, which, due to its compact nature and different demography and local economy, cannot be necessarily handled more efficiently by more rural-oriented provincial and municipal governments. However, not all cities are purely areas of dense urban settlement. To date there are still cities with huge expanses of rural or wilderness areas and considerable non-urban populations, such asCalbayog,Davao,Puerto PrincesaandZamboangaas they were deliberately incorporated with increased future resource needs and urban expansion, as well as strategic considerations, in mind.

With the enactment of the 1991 Local Government Code, municipalities and cities have both become more empowered to deal with local issues. Regular municipalities now share many of the same powers and responsibilities as chartered cities, but its citizens and/or leaders may feel that it might be to their best interest to get a larger share of internal revenue allotment (IRA) and acquire additional powers by becoming a city, especially if the population has greatly increased and local economy has become more robust. On the other hand, due to the higher property taxes that would be imposed after cityhood, many citizens have become wary of their town's conversion into a city, even if the municipality had already achieved a high degree of urbanization and has an annual income that already exceeds that of many existing lower-income cities. This has been among the cases made against the cityhood bids of many high-income and populous municipalities surrounding Metro Manila, most notablyBacoorandDasmariñas(which finally became cities in June 2012 and November 2009 respectively), which for many years have been more qualified to become cities than others.

In response to the rapid increase in the number of municipalities being converted into cities since the enactment of the Local Government Code in 1991, SenatorAquilino Pimentelauthored what became Republic Act No. 9009 in June 2001 which sought to establish a more appropriate benchmark by which municipalities that wished to become cities were to be measured.The income requirement was increased sharply from₱20 million to₱100 million in a bid to curb the spate of conversions into cities of municipalities that were perceived to have not become urbanized or economically developed enough to be able to properly function as a city.

Despite the passage of RA 9009, 16 municipalities not meeting the required locally generated income were converted into cities in 2007 by seeking exemption from the income requirement. This led to vocal opposition from theLeague of Cities of the Philippinesagainst the cityhood of these municipalities, with the League arguing that by letting these municipalities become cities, Congress will set "a dangerous precedent" that would not prevent others from seeking the same "special treatment".More importantly, the LCP argued that with the recent surge in the conversion of towns that did not meet the requirements set by RA 9009 for becoming cities, the allocation received by existing cities would only drastically decrease because more cities will have to share the amount allotted by the national government, which is equal to 23% of the IRA, which in turn is 40% of all the revenues collected by theBureau of Internal Revenue.The resulting legal battles resulted in thenullification of the city charters of the 16 municipalities by the Supreme Courtin August 2010. (See# "League of 16" and legal battles)

Changing city status

Throughout the years there have been instances of changes to the city's status with regard to eligibility for provincial elections, as a result of the passage of laws, both of general effectivity and specific to a city.

Before 1979

Prior to 1979, all cities were just considered chartered cities, without any official category differentiating them aside from income levels. Though chartered cities were considered autonomous from the provinces from which they were created, the eligibility of their residents to vote for provincial officials was determined by their respective charters.

Regarding participation in provincial affairs, there were three types of city charters:

1. those which explicitly allowed their respective residents to elect provincial officials,
2. those which explicitly prohibited participation in provincial elections,
3. and those which are silent regarding voter participation in provincial elections.

The 1951 Supreme Court decision onTeves, et al. v. Commission on Electionsfinally resolved the ambiguity surrounding the third category of cities, by confirming that the residents of cities with such charters (such asDumagueteandDavao City) are ineligible to participate in provincial elections.

Altering the right of city residents to participate in provincial elections was a power solely determined by the national legislature. Before 1979, this power was exercised in seven cases, affecting a total of six cities:

• Five Acts of the National Assembly or Congress in which the residents of an existing city were restored the right to vote for officials of the mother province:
  • August 22, 1940: Section 7 of the revised charter of thecity of Iloilo(Commonwealth Act No. 158) was amended in 1940 by Commonwealth Act No. 604 to explicitly state: "The voters of said City of Iloilo shall take part in the election of the provincial officers of Iloilo, but the latter shall have no jurisdiction over the City of Iloilo and the officers thereof."
  • June 10, 1950: The original city charter ofDagupan(Republic Act No. 170) was originally silent on the matter of the eligibility of city residents to participate in provincial election,therefore implying that residents were ineligible to participate in provincial elections. Three years later Republic Act No. 448 amended the charter to explicitly empower the city's voters to participate in the election of the governor and provincial board members ofPangasinan.
  • June 14, 1956: The city ofCabanatuanwas originally explicitly excluded from electing and being elected into positions in the provincial government ofNueva Ecijauntil its original city charter (Republic Act No. 526) was amended by Republic Act No. 1445 in 1956, which enabled the city's residents to once more vote for provincial officials.
  • June 16, 1956: The original city charter ofDansalan(Commonwealth Act No. 592) was originally silent on the matter of the eligibility of city residents to participate in provincial election,therefore implying that residents were ineligible to participate in provincial elections. Sixteen years later Republic Act No. 1552, in addition to renaming the city toMarawi,also amended the city charter to explicitly empower the city's voters to participate in the election ofLanao Provinceofficials.
  • June 10, 1964:Cebu City's old charter (Commonwealth Act No. 58)was repealed, and replaced with Republic Act No. 3857 in 1964. The law allowed the city's residents to once more become eligible to vote for officials in the provincial government ofCebu.
  • June 21, 1969: Following the Supreme Court decision onTeves, et al. v. Commission on Electionswhich upheldDumaguete's independence fromNegros Oriental,Republic Act No. 5797 was enacted on June 21, 1969, by Congress to revise the city's original charter (Republic Act No. 327)to explicitly allow the city's residents to once again vote for provincial officials.
• One Act of Congress in which the residents of existing cities whose residents were previously explicitly granted the right to participate in provincial elections were deprived such a right:
  • June 19, 1959: By virtue of Section 2 of Republic Act No. 2259, the voters of the cities ofDagupanandIloilowere deprived of the right to participate in provincial elections.

1979–1983

Batas Pambansa Bilang 51,approved on December 22, 1979, introduced two legal categories of cities:highly urbanized cities(HUCs) andcomponent cities.COMELEC Resolution No. 1421, which was issued to implement the provisions ofBP 51prior to theJanuary 30, 1980, local elections,stated that a total of 20 cities were not allowed to participate in the election of provincial officials:seven of these were "highly urbanized", while the remaining 13 were "component" cities.

• WhenBatas Pambansa Bilang 51came into effect for theJanuary 30, 1980, elections,all cities whose incomes at the time were₱40 million or higher were considered highly urbanized cities.Cities that met this income requirement at the time were: Caloocan, Cebu, Davao, Manila, Pasay and Quezon City. Regardless of whether their respective charters allowed them to vote for provincial officials or not, highly urbanized cities were no longer allowed to vote for provincial officials. Among the aforementioned, only the voters ofCebu Citylost the right to participate in provincial elections in this manner; the voters of the other five cities have not participated in any provincial election since their respective incorporation as cities. In addition, Section 3 ofBP 51also madeBaguioa highly urbanized city irrespective of its income,due to its importance as the host to the official summer residences of thePresidentand theSupreme Court.A Supreme Court case decided two days before election day upheld the legality ofBP 51in depriving the voters of Cebu City the power to elect officials for the province ofCebu.
• Per Section 3 ofBP 51,all other cities were considered "component cities" of the provinces in which they are geographically located, or the provinces of which they were originally a part.Despite considering all other cities as part of their respective provinces, underBP 51the eligibility of voters to participate in provincial elections were still determined by their cities' respective charters (as amended).The voters of a total of thirteen "component cities" continued to be ineligible to vote for provincial officials for thelocal elections of 1980.Nine of these were cities with charters (as amended) that expressly prohibited participation in provincial elections:Dagupan,General Santos,Iloilo,Mandaue,Naga,Ormoc,Oroquieta,San Carlos (Pangasinan)andZamboanga.The remaining four —Bais,Canlaon,CotabatoandOzamiz— were cities whose charters were silent on participation in provincial elections;BP 51upheld the 1951 Supreme Court decision onTeves, et al. v. Commission on Electionsby barring their residents from participating in the election of provincial officials.

1983–1987

Batas Pambansa Bilang 337(Local Government Code of 1983), approved on February 10, 1983, further refined the criteria by which cities can be classified as highly urbanized cities.UnderBP 337a city that had at least 150,000 inhabitants and an income of at least₱30 million was to be declared highly urbanized by the Minister of Local Government within thirty days of the city having met the requirement.The cities of Angeles (October 13, 1986), Bacolod (September 27, 1984), Butuan (February 7, 1985), Cagayan de Oro, Iligan (both November 22, 1983), Olongapo (December 7, 1983), and Zamboanga (November 22, 1983) became HUCs in this manner. The residents in most of these cities lost their right to participate in provincial elections for the first time. The two exceptions are:Iloilo City,which had already been deprived of the right to vote for provincial officials in 1959 by virtue of Section 2 of RA 2259,andZamboanga City,which had been autonomously governed since its creation by virtue of Section 47 of its city charter (Commonwealth Act No. 39).

By virtue of Section 30 ofBatas Pambansa Bilang 881(Omnibus Election Code of the Philippines), approved on December 3, 1985, provided that: "unless their respective charters provide otherwise, the electorate of component cities shall be entitled to vote in the election for provincial officials of the province of which it is a part."This provision therefore overrides the 1951 Supreme Court decision onTeves, et al. v. Commission on Electionsby providing voters in component cities whose charters are silent on the matter of electing provincial officials the right to again participate in provincial elections.BP 881therefore again enfranchised voters in the cities ofBaisandCanlaon(Negros Oriental), andOzamiz(Misamis Occidental). Despite the charter of the city ofCotabatobeing silent on the matter of electing provincial officials, the city was not legislated to be part of any of the successor provinces of the old undivided Cotabato province. Voters of the city therefore were still not eligible to vote in the provincial elections of eitherMaguindanaoorNorth Cotabatoand therefore remained independent from any province.

1987–1991

The period between ratification of the new Constitution (February 1987) and the effectivity of the Local Government Code of 1991 (January 1992) was one of transition. During this time,BP 51,BP 337andBP 881were still in force: the only legal classes of cities during this period were still "highly urbanized" and "component" cities.

Altering the right of city residents to participate in provincial elections was once again exercised by the newly restored Congress in this period. A total of three cities were affected: Republic Acts Nos. 6641 (in 1987),6726 (in 1989)and 6843 (in 1990),once again allowed the residents ofMandaue,OroquietaandSan Carlosto vote for provincial officials ofCebu,Misamis OccidentalandPangasinanrespectively. SinceBP 51—which only considered cities as being either "highly urbanized" or "component" —was still in force at the time, the changes were not considered as switching between legal categories,but rather a simple change within the "component city" classification that did not require a plebiscite. The "independent component city" legal classification was only introduced through the Local Government Code in 1992.

Under the same criteria set inBP 337(Local Government Code of 1983), a total of three cities became highly urbanized: General Santos (September 5, 1988), Lucena (July 1, 1991) and Mandaue (February 15, 1991). Lucena and Mandaue were special cases, in that because their re-classification into HUC status took place after the ratification of theConstitution(February 11, 1987) but before the effectivity of the Local Government Code of 1991 (January 1, 1992), their residents were allowed to continue to participate in the election of provincial officials as per their respective charters (as amended), by virtue of Section 452-c of the LGC.Residents of General Santos were already excluded from voting for provincial officials ofSouth Cotabatosince achieving cityhood in 1968; they were therefore unaffected by this exemption.

1992–present

The Local Government Code of 1991 came into effect on January 1, 1992, and has remained in force ever since, though some amendments have been made.New requirements for creating cities, and upgrading cities to highly urbanized status, were instituted under this Act. TheLGC of 1991was also the first time theindependent component city(ICC) category was introduced. These cities are those non-highly urbanized cities whose charters explicitly prohibited city residents to vote in provincial elections. They were finally made completely independent of the province from fiscal, administrative and legal standpoints.

Upgrading

• Independent municipality to highly urbanized city

The municipalities ofMetro Manila,having been severed from the provinces of Bulacan and Rizal and made independent units in 1975, were converted to highly urbanized cities, beginning in 1994 withMandaluyong.The most recent,Navotas,became an HUC in 2007. OnlyPateros,which does not currently meet the population requirement of 200,000 inhabitants, remains the only independent municipality in Metro Manila.

• Component city to independent component city (CC–ICC)

All that is needed is a congressional amendment to a component city's charter, prohibiting city residents to vote for provincial officials. In the last quarter of 2021, Samar 1st district congressmanEdgar Mary Sarmientoproposed to convert the city ofCalbayogfrom being a component city into an independent component city through the virtue of House Bill No. 10483.

• Component/independent component city to highly urbanized city (CC/ICC–HUC)

Since 1992, once a city reaches a population of 200,000 persons as certified by thePhilippine Statistics Authorityand an income of₱50 million (based on 1991 constant prices) as certified by the city treasurer, the city government can submit a request to thePresidentto have their city declared as highly urbanized within 30 days. Upon the President's declaration, a plebiscite will be held within a specific timeframe to ratify this conversion. There are no limits as to the number of times a component city can attempt to become a highly urbanized city, should previous tries be unsuccessful.

• Since 1992 three component cities have been successfully converted into HUCs:
  • Puerto Princesa(2007): Proclamation No. 1264 signed on March 26, 2007, declared the capital city ofPalawanan HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on July 21, 2007, approved the conversion.
  • Lapu-Lapu(2007): Proclamation No. 1222 signed on January 23, 2007, declared the component city of Lapu-Lapu an HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on July 21, 2007, approved the conversion.
  • Tacloban(2008): Proclamation No. 1637 signed on October 4, 2008, declared the capital city ofLeytean HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on December 18, 2008, approved the conversion.
• The following component cities failed to become HUCs, for various reasons:
  • Cabanatuan(1997): Proclamation No. 969 signed on February 13, 1997, declared the former capital of the province ofNueva Ecijaan HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held simultaneously with thebarangay elections on May 12, 1997did not approve the conversion.
  • Tarlac City(2005): Proclamation No. 940 signed on October 27, 2005, declared the capital city of the province ofTarlacan HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on February 11, 2006, did not approve the conversion.
  • Antipolo(2011): Proclamation No. 124 signed on March 14, 2011, declared the capital city of the province ofRizalan HUC.On April 4, 2011, Antipolo's city mayor announced that the planned June 18, 2011, plebiscite is indefinitely postponed, effectively suspending the bid to convert the city into an HUC.
  • Cabanatuan (2012): Proclamation No. 418 signed on July 4, 2012, once again declared the former capital of the province ofNueva Ecijaan HUC.The plebiscite was originally set for December 1, 2012, but, due to preparations for the upcoming2013 national, ARMM and local elections,was rescheduled by the COMELEC for January 25, 2014.A week before the rescheduled plebiscite, theSupreme Courtissued a temporary restraining order, which postponed the vote until the case brought by Nueva Ecija governor Aurelio Umali was decided.On April 22, 2014, the Supreme Court ordered the Commission to include the rest of Nueva Ecija in the plebiscite, given that the province's income will be significantly affected once Cabanatuan attains autonomy as an HUC.The Commission subsequently rescheduled the expanded plebiscite for November 8, 2014.However, on October 21 it issued Minute Resolution No. 14-0732, which suspended the voting until the city government of Cabanatuan provides the₱101 million needed to administer the expanded plebiscite.
  • San Jose del Monte(2020): Proclamation No. 1057 signed on December 4, 2020, declared the component city of the province ofBulacanan HUC.Majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on October 30, 2023, did not approve the conversion.

Downgrading

Highly urbanized city to component city

Reclassifying an HUC as a component city likely involves not only amending the concerned city's charter, but also the Local Government Code,as currently there is no provision in theLGCthat allows this, nor are there any precedents. SomeCebu Citypoliticians have previously indicated that they wish to bring back the city under the province's control, to bring in more votes against theSugbuak,the proposedpartitionof Cebu Province.

Independent component city to component city

A congressional amendment to the city charter enabling city residents to vote for provincial officials is required, followed by a plebiscite.Santiago's status as an independent component city was briefly in question after the enactment of Republic Act No. 8528 on February 14, 1998, which sought to make it a regular component city.The Supreme Court on September 16, 1999, however ruled in favor of the city's mayor who contended that such a change in the status of the city required a plebiscite just like any other merger, division, abolition or alteration in boundaries of any political unit. And due to the lack of a plebiscite to affirm such a change, RA 8528 was therefore unconstitutional.

Amendments

On April 11, 2022, a day after it lapsed into law without the signature of the president, President Rodrigo Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11683, which amended Section 450 of the Local Government Code, making the conversion of municipalities into cities easier. The amendments state that if a municipality generates at least ₱400 million for two consecutive years, it will be exempt from the land and population requirements.

League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP)

Main article:League of Cities of the Philippines

The League is a non-profit organization and is not a government agency and was founded in 1988. As of July 8, 2023, the league has a membership of 149 cities. The organization was formed to help coordinate efforts to improve governance and local autonomy and to tackle issues such as preserving the environment and improving public works.

List of cities

Further information:List of cities in the Philippines

As of July 8, 2023,there are 149cities in the Philippines.CarmonainCaviteis the newest city, after the plebiscite held resulted in approval of ratification on July 8, 2023.

class=notpageimage|

Location of the 149 cities of the Philippines (as of July 2023)

Largest cities

For a more comprehensive list, seeList of cities and municipalities in the Philippines.

The ten most populous cities in the Philippines

#	City	Population (2020)	Image	Description
1	Quezon City	2,960,048		Former capital of the country (1948–1976). Largest city in Metro Manila in population and land area. Hosts theHouse of Representatives of the Philippinesat theBatasang Pambansa Complexand the metropolis' largest source of water, the La Mesa Reservoir.
2	Manila	1,846,513		Capital of the country (1571–1948 and 1976–present). Historically centered on the walled city ofIntramuros,by the mouth of thePasig River.Host to the seat of the chief executive, theMalacañang Palace.By far the most densely populated city in the country, as well as the whole world.
3	Davao City	1,776,949		The largest city inMindanaoby population. Popularly nicknamed "The King City of the South". Historically centered near where theDavao Riverexits intoDavao Gulf,the city also encompasses expanses of wilderness, including part of theMount Apo Natural Park,making it the largest city in the Philippines by land area. Regional center of theRegion XI,and core of the third-largest and last metropolitan area in the country,Metro Davao.
4	Caloocan	1,661,584		Historic city whereAndrés Bonifacioand theKatipunanheld many of its meetings in secrecy. Much of its territory was ceded to form Quezon City, resulting in the formation of two non-contiguous sections under the city's jurisdiction. The city mainly encompasses residential areas, with significant industrial and commercial sections.
5	Taguig	1,223,595		Lying on the western shore ofLaguna de Bay,the city encompasses significant industrial, commercial and residential areas, including the disputed area ofFort Bonifacio,a former American military base that has been in development as the country's new premierbusiness district.Was part of Rizal Province until 1975, when it was incorporated into Metro Manila.
6	Zamboanga City	977,234		Nicknamed "City of Flowers" and marketed by its city government as "Asia's Latin City" for its substantialSpanish-derived Creole-speaking population. Former capital of theMoro Provinceand of the undivided province ofZamboanga.Former regional center of theZamboanga Peninsulaadministrative region, but remains the largest city in westernMindanao.In 2028, Zamboanga City is projected to become the Metropolitan Center ofZamboanga Peninsulaafter hitting the 1,200,000 population mark, which will classify the city as aMetropolitan Citybased on theNEDA's classification system.
7	Cebu City	964,169		Popularly nicknamed "The Queen City of the South". Site of the first Spanish settlement in the country. Regional center ofRegion VII,most populous city in theVisayasand core of the country's second-largest metropolitan area,Metro Cebu.It is the capital ofCebu Provincewherein it is geographically located but administratively independent of the provincial government.
8	Antipolo	887,399		Nicknamed "City in the Sky" for its location on the hills immediately east of Metro Manila. Well-known pilgrimage and tourist center, being host toa Marian shrineand theHinulugang Taktak National Park.Most populous component city in the country, and comprises more than a quarter of the total population of the province ofRizaland the capital of that province.
9	Pasig	803,159		Hosts most of theOrtigas Center,one of Metro Manila's prime business districts. Located whereLaguna de Bayempties into thePasig River.Part of the province ofRizaluntil 1975, when it was incorporated into Metro Manila. Formerly hosted the capitol and other government buildings of that province.
10	Cagayan de Oro	728,402		Nicknamed the "City of Golden Friendship" and formerly known asCagayan de Misamis.Located at the mouth of the swift-flowingCagayan de Oro River,which has become a tourist draw.Regional center ofNorthern Mindanao.It is the capital of the province ofMisamis Orientalwherein it is geographically located but administratively independent of the provincial government.

Metropolitan areas

Main article:List of metropolitan areas in the Philippines

City facts

• Bypopulation(2020 census figures)
  • Smallest:Palayan(45,383)
  • Largest:Quezon City(2,960,048)
• By population density (calculated using 2020 census figures):
  • Most densely populated:Manila,with 41,515 people per square kilometer
  • Most sparsely populated:Puerto Princesa,with 130 people per square kilometer
• Byland area:
  • Smallest:San Juan,with an area of 5.94 square kilometres (2.29 sq mi)
  • Largest:Davao City,with an area of 2,433.61 square kilometres (939.62 sq mi).However, some sources claim thatPuerto Princesacovers an area of more than 2,500 square kilometres (970 sq mi),its officially recognized land area figure (according to IRA share calculation data)is 2,381.02 square kilometres (919.32 sq mi). Contrary to popular belief within the Philippines,Davao City does not hold the record of being the world's largest city in terms of land area.
• By elevation:
  • Lowest:Most Philippine cities are located on sea level. However, some parts ofNavotas,SouthCaloocanandMalabonare below sea level, and continue to experience subsidence.
  • Highest:much ofBaguiois situated more than 1,300 metres (4,300 ft) above sea level. However, the peak ofMount Apo,the tallest mountain in the Philippines, forms part ofDavao City's boundary with the municipality ofBansalan, Davao del Sur;the city ofDigosencompasses a section of theMount Apo Natural Parkas well.
• Most extreme points:
  • Northernmost:Laoag
  • Southernmost:General Santos
  • Easternmost:Bislig
  • Westernmost:Puerto Princesa

Defunct/dissolved cities

• Legazpi City (1948–1954): Legazpi's cityhood was approved on June 18, 1948. Under Republic Act No. 306, Legazpi became a city after the President of the Philippines proclaimed its cityhood.Comprising the present-day territories ofLegazpi CityandDaraga,the city was dissolved on June 8, 1954when Legazpi and Daraga were made into separate municipalities. Legazpi eventually became a city on its own on June 12, 1959.
• Basilan City (1948–1973): Formerly part of the city ofZamboangauntil it was made a city on its own in 1948 through Republic Act No. 288.Delimited to only the downtown area of what is nowIsabela Cityupon the creation of the province ofBasilanin 1973 throughPresidential Decree No. 356by PresidentFerdinand Marcos.Finally abolished and its territory annexed to themunicipality of Isabelaon November 7, 1975, throughPresidential Decree No. 840.
• Rajah Buayan City (1966): Under Republic Act No. 4413,the then-municipality of General Santos in what was then the unified province of Cotabato was to be formally converted into a city named after a historical ruler in Mindanao on January 1, 1966, provided that majority of qualified voters in the municipality vote in favor of cityhood in a plebiscite. In December 1965 the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) proclaimed the cityhood of Rajah Buayan, with 4,422 people voting for and 3,066 voting against. However, two residents of the new city challenged this by arguing in the courts that the number of people who voted in favor of cityhood did not form a majority in light of the fact that there were 15,727 voters in the city. The court issued an injunction on January 4, 1966, restraining city officers from performing any acts authorized by or pursuant to provisions in RA 4413. TheSupreme Courtunanimously upheld this decision on October 29, 1966, and declared that the city charter was not accepted by majority of voters, thus rendering RA 4413 null and void.The municipality of General Santos would later be converted into acity under the same namein 1968.

"League of 16" and legal battles

Main article:League of Cities of the Philippines vs. COMELEC

TheSupreme Court of the Philippines,by a highly divided vote of 6–5, on November 18, 2008, subsequently upheld with finality on May 6, 2009, declared unconstitutional cityhood laws converting 16 municipalities into cities. The 24-page judgment of Justice Antonio T. Carpio, adjudged that the following cityhood laws violate secs. 6 and 10, Article X of the Constitution of the Philippines:

• RA No. 9389 (Baybay,Leyte)
• RA No. 9390 (Bogo,Cebu)
• RA No. 9391 (Catbalogan,Samar)
• RA No. 9392 (Tandag,Surigao del Sur)
• RA No. 9393 (Lamitan,Basilan)
• RA No. 9394 (Borongan,Eastern Samar)
• RA No. 9398 (Tayabas,Quezon)
• RA No. 9404 (Tabuk,Kalinga)
• RA No. 9405 (Bayugan,Agusan del Sur)
• RA No. 9407 (Batac,Ilocos Norte)
• RA No. 9408 (Mati,Davao Oriental)
• RA No. 9409 (Guihulngan,Negros Oriental)
• RA No. 9434 (Cabadbaran,Agusan del Norte)
• RA No. 9435 (El Salvador,Misamis Oriental)
• RA No. 9436 (Carcar,Cebu)
• RA No. 9491 (Naga,Cebu)

The Court held that the foregoing cityhood laws, all enacted after RA 9009's effectivity, "explicitly exempt respondent municipalities from the increased income requirement from₱20 million to₱100 million in Section 450 of the Local Government Code (LGC), as amended by RA 9009. Such exemption clearly violates Section 10, Article X of the Constitution and is thus patently unconstitutional. To be valid, such exemption must be written in the Local Government Code and not in any other law, including the Cityhood Laws. "

However, more than a year later, on December 22, 2009, acting on the appeal of the so-called League of 16 Cities (an informal group consisting of the sixteen local government units whose cityhood status had been reversed), the Supreme Court reversed its earlier ruling as it ruled that "at the end of the day, the passage of the amendatory law (regarding the criteria for cityhood as set by Congress) is no different from the enactment of a law, i.e., the cityhood laws specifically exempting a particular political subdivision from the criteria earlier mentioned. Congress, in enacting the exempting law/s, effectively decreased the already codified indicators."As such, the cityhood status of the said 16 LGUs was effectively restored.

On August 24, 2010, in a 16-page resolution, theSupreme Courtreinstated its November 18, 2008, decision striking down the cityhood laws, reducing once more the sixteen LGUs to the status of regular municipalities.

The most recent development in the legal battles surrounding the League of 16 came on February 15, 2011. Voting 7–6, the Supreme Court (SC) ruled that 16 towns that became cities in 2007 can stay as cities. This was the fourth time the SC has ruled on the case, and the third reversal. It said the conversion of the 16 towns into cities met all legal requirements.

In March 2011, the League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP), while challenging a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the cityhood conversion of 16 municipalities, has expressed support for the cityhood bids of 21 towns that have fulfilled the requirements outlined in the Local Government Code. These towns have demonstrated their compliance with the eligibility criteria required for cityhood were endorsed by the LCP for cityhood conversion:

• Laguna:Cabuyao,San Pedro
• Rizal:Cainta,Taytay,Binangonan
• Cavite:Bacoor,General Trias,Imus,Carmona,Silang
• Nueva Ecija:Pantabangan
• Batangas:Calaca,Santo Tomas,Bauan,Nasugbu
• Quezon:Mauban
• Bulacan:Marilao,Santa Maria,Norzagaray
• Bataan:Limay

Rejected cityhood

Note: This section only lists attempts that reached the stage where a Republic Act was enacted for the purpose of achieving cityhood.

• Batangas(1965): A majority of the votes cast in the then-municipality of Batangas rejected cityhood in a plebiscite conducted on the same day as the1965 Philippine general elections,as mandated by Republic Act No. 4586.The city would have been namedLaurel Cityin honor ofJose P. Laurel,thepresidentof theJapanese-sponsoredSecond Republic.The municipality of Batangas would later be converted into acity under the same namein 1969.
• Tarlac(1969): The city charter of Tarlac (Republic Act No. 5907) was approved on June 21, 1969.Cityhood was rejected in a plebiscite held on November 11, 1969, by a majority of the ballots cast. Tarlac became a city 29 years after, in 1998.
• Taguig(1998): Republic Act No. 8487, Taguig was supposed to be converted into a highly urbanized city but it was rejected due to lower income. More than six years later, the cityhood of Taguig was ratified with majority of the ballots cast votes in a plebiscite held on December 8, 2004.
• Ilagan(1999): Republic Act No. 8474, which converted Ilagan to a component city ofIsabela,was approved on February 2, 1998.However, majority of votes cast in the plebiscite held on March 14, 1999, rejected cityhood. Ilagan finally became a city after majority of votes cast in the August 11, 2012, plebiscite approved the Republic Act No. 10169.
• Novaliches(1999): On February 23, 1998, the controversial City Charter of Novaliches (Republic Act No. 8535) was approved, which sought to create a new city out of the 15 northern barangays ofQuezon City.Historically a separate town, Novaliches was distributed between Quezon City and northernCaloocanin 1948. In a plebiscite held on October 23, 1999, the majority of ballots cast (which included all voters of Quezon City and not just the 15 barangays) rejected the cityhood of Novaliches.
• Meycauayan(2001): Cityhood was rejected by majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite held on March 30, 2001, to ratify Republic Act No. 9021.Meycauayan became a city five years later with the enactment of Republic Act No. 9356and its ratification through a plebiscite on December 10, 2006.

Former names

For a more comprehensive list, seeList of renamed cities and municipalities in the Philippines.

Note: This section only lists name changes made upon or since cityhood.

• Cagayan de Oro:The municipality ofCagayanwas converted to the city ofCagayan de Oroin June 15, 1950, through Republic Act No. 521.An earlier bill was filed by Misamis Oriental Congressman Pedro S. Baculio for the creation of the City of Cagayan, however the 1st Congress was adjourned before any readings for the bill had done. The final, and enacted, cityhood bill authored by Congressman (and later Vice President)Emmanuel Pelaezgave the city its present name.
• Lapu-Lapu:The municipality ofOponwas converted to a city named afterLapulapu,hero of theBattle of Mactanin 1961 through Republic Act No. 3134.
• Marawi:Inaugurated as the City ofDansalanin 1950, renamed toMarawion June 16, 1956, through Republic Act No. 1552.
• Ozamiz:The municipality ofMisamiswas converted to a city named afterJoséOzámiz,the first governor ofMisamis Occidental,in 1948 through Republic Act No. 321.
• Pasay:Inaugurated asRizal Cityin 1947, reverted toPasayon June 7, 1950, through Republic Act No. 437.
• Roxas:In 1951, the municipality ofCapizwas converted to a city named afterManuelRoxas,the first president of the Third Philippine Republic and town native through Republic Act No. 603.

Proposed cities

The following municipalities with pending bills for conversion into cities as filed in the19th Congress:

• Liloan, Cebu:House Bill No. 99 by Rep. Vincent Franco Frasco
• Talavera, Nueva Ecija:House Bill No. 215 by Rep. Mikaela Angela B. Suansing
• La Trinidad, Benguet:House Bill No. 317 by Rep. Eric G. Yap
• Bataraza, Palawan:House Bill No. 334 by Michael L. Romero
• Bayambang, Pangasinan:House Bill No. 384 by Rep. Maria Rachel J. Arenas
• Balamban, Cebu:House Bill No. 1018 by Rep. Pablo John Garcia
• Capas, Tarlac:House Bill No. 1186 by Rep. Christian Tell A. Yap, House Bill 3116 by Noel N. Rivera
• Daraga, Albay:House Bill No. 1303 by Rep. Joey S. Salceda
• Consolacion, Cebu:House Bill No. 1324 by Rep. Daphne Lagon and Sonny "SL" Lagon
• Mexico, Pampanga:House Bill No. 1683 by Rep. Aurelio D. Gonzales Jr.
• Solano, Nueva Vizcaya:House Bill No. 1736 by Rep. Luisa "Banti" Cuaresma
• Manolo Fortich, Bukidnon:House Bill No. 2597 by Rep. Jose Manuel F. Alba
• Nabunturan, Davao de Oro:House Bill No. 2854 by Rep. Rowel Peter Gonzaga
• Ubay, Bohol:House Bill No. 5203 by Rep. Maria Vanessa C. Aumentado
• Malay, Aklan:House Bill No. 6401 by Rep. Teodorico Herasco Jr

Additionally, there are three House Bills seeking to automatically convert all capital towns in provinces with no current component cities, independent component cities or highly urbanized cities into cities: House Bill No. 313 by Rep. Eric G. Yap, House Bill No. 3396 by Rep. Wilter Y. Palma, and House Bill No. 3538 by Rep. Paul R. Daza.

Pending ratification

Into a highly urbanized city

• Pagadian

See also

• Sangguniang Panlungsod
• List of cities in the Philippines
• List of metropolitan areas in the Philippines
• List of cities and municipalities in the Philippines
• List of renamed cities and municipalities in the Philippines

External links

• League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP)
• Philippine Clean Cities Project
• CityMayors.com article