Inverse Laplace transform

Inmathematics,theinverse Laplace transformof afunctionis arealfunctionthat is piecewise-continuous,exponentially-restricted (that is,for some constantsand) and has the property:

wheredenotes theLaplace transform.

It can be proven that, if a functionhas the inverse Laplace transform,thenis uniquely determined (considering functions which differ from each other only on a point set havingLebesgue measurezero as the same). This result was first proven byMathias Lerchin 1903 and is known as Lerch's theorem.[1][2]

TheLaplace transformand the inverse Laplace transform together have a number of properties that make them useful for analysinglinear dynamical systems.

Mellin's inverse formula

edit

An integral formula for the inverseLaplace transform,called theMellin's inverse formula,theBromwichintegral,or theFourierMellinintegral,is given by theline integral:

where the integration is done along the vertical linein thecomplex planesuch thatis greater than the real part of allsingularitiesofandis bounded on the line, for example if the contour path is in theregion of convergence.If all singularities are in the left half-plane, oris anentire function,thencan be set to zero and the above inverse integral formula becomes identical to theinverse Fourier transform.

In practice, computing the complex integral can be done by using theCauchy residue theorem.

Post's inversion formula

edit

Post's inversion formulaforLaplace transforms,named afterEmil Post,[3]is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform.

The statement of the formula is as follows: Letbe a continuous function on the intervalof exponential order, i.e.

for some real number.Then for all,the Laplace transform forexists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to.Furthermore, ifis the Laplace transform of,then the inverse Laplace transform ofis given by

for,whereis the-th derivative ofwith respect to.

As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes.

With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using theGrunwald–Letnikov differintegralto evaluate the derivatives.

Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where thepolesoflie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for bigusing inverseMellin transformsfor several arithmetical functions related to theRiemann hypothesis.

Software tools

edit

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^Cohen, A. M. (2007). "Inversion Formulae and Practical Results".Numerical Methods for Laplace Transform Inversion.Numerical Methods and Algorithms. Vol. 5. pp. 23–44.doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68855-8_2.ISBN978-0-387-28261-9.
  2. ^Lerch, M.(1903)."Sur un point de la théorie des fonctions génératrices d'Abel".Acta Mathematica.27:339–351.doi:10.1007/BF02421315.hdl:10338.dmlcz/501554.
  3. ^Post, Emil L. (1930)."Generalized differentiation".Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.32(4): 723–781.doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1930-1501560-X.ISSN0002-9947.
  4. ^Abate, J.; Valkó, P. P. (2004). "Multi-precision Laplace transform inversion".International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.60(5): 979.Bibcode:2004IJNME..60..979A.doi:10.1002/nme.995.S2CID119889438.

Further reading

edit
edit

This article incorporates material from Mellin's inverse formula onPlanetMath,which is licensed under theCreative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.