Wikipedia

Jund Filastin

Jund Filasṭīn(Arabic:جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن,"themilitary districtofPalestine") was one of the military districts of theUmayyadandAbbasidprovince ofBilad al-Sham(Levant), organized soon after theMuslim conquest of the Levantin the 630s. Jund Filastin, which encompassed most ofPalaestina PrimaandPalaestina Tertia,included the newly established city ofRamlaas its capital and eleven administrative districts (kura), each ruled from a central town.[1]

Jund Filastin
Province of theUmayyad,AbbasidandFatimidCaliphates
630s–late 11th century

Early Islamic Syria (Bilad al-Sham) and its provinces under theAbbasid Caliphatein the 9th century
Capitalc. 630s–c. 715:JerusalemandLudd(likely dual capitals)
c. 715–1099:Ramla
History
• Established
630s
late 11th century
Preceded by		 Succeeded by
Palaestina Prima
Kingdom of Jerusalem
Today part ofIsrael
West Bank
Jordan

History

edit

Muslim conquest

edit

The Muslim conquest of Palestine is difficult to reconstruct, according to the historianDominique Sourdel.[2]It is generally agreed that theQurayshitecommanderAmr ibn al-Aswas sent to conquer the area by CaliphAbu Bakr,[3][4]likely in 633.[4]Amr traversed theRed Seacoast of theHejaz(western Arabia), reached the port town ofAylaat the head of theGulf of Aqaba,then crossed into theNegev Desertor further west into theSinai Peninsula.He then arrived to the villages of Dathin and Badan nearGaza,where he entered negotiations with the Byzantine garrison commander. The talks collapsed and the Muslims bested the Byzantines in the subsequentclash at Dathinin February or March 634.[2][3]At this stage of the conquest Amr's troops encamped at Ghamr al-Arabat in the middle of theAraba Valleybetween theDead Seaand the Gulf of Aqaba.[3]The town of Gaza was left alone, with Amr's primary objective at the time being the subjugation of the Arab tribes in the vicinity.[5]

After the Muslims armies led byKhalid ibn al-WalidcapturedBosrain theHauranin May 634 they crossed theJordan Riverto reinforce Amr as he faced a large Byzantine army. In the ensuingBattle of Ajnadayn,fought at a site 25 kilometers (16 mi) southwest ofJerusalemin July or August, the Muslims under Amr's overall command routed the Byzantines.[6]In the aftermath of Ajnadayn, Amr captured the towns ofSebastia,Nablus,Lydda,Yibna,Amwas,Bayt JibrinandJaffa.[7]Most of these towns fell after minor resistance, hence the scant information available about them in the sources.[8]

Following the decisive Muslim victory against the Byzantines at theBattle of Yarmouk(636), fought along theYarmouktributary of the Jordan River east of Palestine, Amr besieged Jerusalem, which held out until the arrival of CaliphUmar,to whom Jerusalem's leaders surrendered in 637.[9]The coastal towns of Gaza,AscalonandCaesareahad continued to hold out. The commanderAlqama ibn Mujazzizmay have been sent against Byzantine forces in Gaza a number of times during and after Ajnadayn.[10]Amr launched his conquest of Egypt from Jerusalemc. 640.[11]Caesarea was besieged for a lengthy period and captured most likely byMu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyanin 639, 640 or 641.[8]Not long after, Mu'awiya captured Ascalon, completing the conquest of Palestine,[9]most of which had been undertaken by Amr.[4]

Early administration

edit

Filastin became one of the four originaljunds(military districts) ofBilad al-Sham(Islamic Syria) established by Caliph Umar.[12]In effect the Muslims maintained the preexisting administrative organization of the Byzantine district ofPalaestina Prima.[9]

TheUmayyadperiod (661–750) was a relatively prosperous period for Filastin and the Umayyad caliphs invested considerably in the district's development.[13]According to Sourdel, "Palestine was particularly honoured in the Umayyad period".[9]The first Umayyad caliph, Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan, who held overall authority over Syria, including Palestine, from the reign of CaliphUthman(r. 644–656), was initially recognized as caliph in a ceremony in Jerusalem.[9]

On the other hand, a change in Syria's policy during theAbbasidperiod resulted in a decline in the region. Syria was now further from the seat of authority as the capital relocated from Damascus to Baghdad. The new policy preferred Iraq over Syria for several reasons: the local Arab population was strongly identified with their rivals, the Umayyads. Moreover, the Abbasids promoted trade with eastern nations like China and India. This led to neglect, political unrest, and occasionally local rebellions, such as by a figure known asAl-Mubarqa.A process of urban decline is believed to had been accelerated by the749 earthquake,which increased the number of Jews, Christians, and Samaritans who migrated to diaspora settlements while also leaving behind others who stayed in the devastated towns and impoverished villages until they embraced Islam.[14]

Geography

edit

At its greatest extent, Filastin extended from Rafah in the south toLajjunin the north, and from the Mediterranean coast well to the east of the southern part of theJordan River.The mountains ofEdom,and the town ofZoar(Sughar) at the southeastern end of theDead Seawere included in the district. However, theGalileewas excluded, being part ofJund al-Urdunnin the north.[15]Filastin roughly comprised the regions ofSamaria,Judea,and the adjacent Mediterranean coastal plain fromMount Carmelin the north to Gaza in the south.[2]

According toal-Baladhuri,the main towns of Filastin, following its conquest by theRashidun Caliphate,were, from south to north,Rafah,Gaza, Bayt Jibrin, Yibna, Amwas, Lydda, Jaffa, Nablus, Sebastia, and Caesarea.[15]Under Byzantine rule the port city of Caesarea was the territory's capital, a natural choice as it eased communications with the capitalConstantinople.After the Muslim conquest, the administrative focus shifted to the interior. Amwas was referred to as aqasabain the early Islamic sources; the term could refer to a central town, but most likely meant a fortified camp in the case of Amwas. It served as the principal military camp of the Muslim troops, where spoils were divided and stipends paid, until it was abandoned by the troops in 639 due to theplague of Amwas.[16]From about 640 Ludd and/orJerusalemhave been determined as the capital or political-religious center of Filastin, according to modern historians.[16][a]

After the caliphSulayman ibn Abd al-Malikfounded the city ofRamlanext to Ludd, he designated it the capital, and most of Ludd's inhabitants were forced to settle there. In the 9th century, duringAbbasidrule, Jund Filastin was the most fertile of Syria's districts, and contained at least twentymosques,despite its small size.[15]

After theFatimidsconquered the district from the Abbasids,Jerusalemeventually became the capital, and the principal towns were Ascalon, Ramla, Gaza,Arsuf,Caesarea, Jaffa,Jericho,Nablus, Bayt Jibrin, andAmman.[15]The district persisted in some form until theSeljukinvasions and theCrusadesof the late 11th century.[citation needed]

Population

edit

At the time of the Arab conquest, Filastin had been inhabited mainly by Aramaic-speakingMiaphysiteChristian peasants.[15]Samaria,in the northern part of the district, had a largeSamaritanpopulation.[17]Two separate gradual demographic processes—culturalArabizationand religiousIslamization—were initiated after the Islamic conquest.[18]It is believed that the settlements of Arabs both before and after the Muslim conquest contributed at least partially to the pace of Arabization and Islamization.[19][20][21][22]The principal Arab tribes which inhabited Filastin and formed its army were theLakhm,Judham,Kinana,Khath'am,Khuza'a,andAzd Sarat.[23]However, the pre-Islamic Byzantine population did not become predominantly Muslim and Arab in identity until several centuries after the conquest[15]with full Arabization achieved during the 9th century, and Islamization up until the Mamluk period.[24]

Samaria was one of the first regions in Palestine to undergo an Islamization process.Samaritanand Christian populations dominated the region during the Byzantine period, but during the early Islamic period, particularly under Abbasid and Tulunid rule, Samaria became gradually Islamized as a result of Arab settlement as well as the impacts of anarchy, high taxes, religious persecution, and droughts, which drove many Samaritans to convert to Islam.[24]By the end of the period, the rural Samaritan population had "disappeared," and the remaining Samaritans had concentrated in urban areas, with Nablus serving as a major center, but there were also other Samaritan communities in Caesarea and Askhelon, and outside of Palestine in cities such as Aleppo, Damascus, and Sarepta.[25][26][17][27]The ChristianMelkitecommunity, on the other hand, while undergoing a process ofArabization,was able to resist the expansion of Islam and preserve its religious and cultural identity for a longer period of time[18]until mass-Islamization in the Mamluk and Ottoman periods.[24][28]

Governors

edit

The governors of Jund Filastin:

Rashidun period

edit
  • Amr ibn al-AsandAlqama ibn Mujazziz al-Kinani(634–639; they were assigned as the commanders in charge of Filastin by Caliph Abu Bakr)[29]
  • Alqama ibn Mujazziz al-Kinani (639–641 or 644; when Amr left Filastin to conquer Egypt, Alqama was left as governor.[29]One version in the Islamic tradition placed his death in 641,[30]while another held that he was governor at the death of Caliph Umar in 644[31]According to one version Umar made Alqama governor of half of Filastin from his seat in Jerusalem, while Alqama ibn Hakim al-Kinani was appointed over the other half of Palestine from Ramla—Lydda is most likely meant here. This division may have been done following the plague of Amwas in 639.[32][33])
  • Abd al-Rahman ibn Alqama al-Kinani (c. 644–645 or 646; governed for undetermined period during the reign of Umar's successor CaliphUthmanin 644–656)[34]
  • Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan(645 or 646–661; appointed by Caliph Uthman after the death of Abd al-Rahman ibn Alqama; he was already governor of the junds of Dimashq and al-Urdunn under Umar was given authority overJund Himsby Uthman)[35]

Umayyad period

edit

Abbasid period

edit

Fatimid period

edit

Information about the Fatimid provincial administration in Filastin, as with the other provinces in Bilad al-Sham, is scant, and largely limited to the period of 1023–1025, which was covered by the surviving fragment of the chronicle ofal-Musabbihi(d. 1029). It is not clear to what degree the governor (wali) of Filastin's capital of Ramla was responsible for the rest of the province. The governor of Ramla was in charge of the local police force, but theqadi(head judge) in the city was appointed directly by the caliph's court as was the auditor (zimmam) of the fiscal administrator (amil) of Filastin. At least one military governor (mutawali harb) of Filastin,Anushtakin al-Dizbari,is named.[62]Other cities in Filastin, including Jerusalem, Caesarea,[63]andAsqalan,also had their own governors, with the governors of Asqalan at one point holding the highest rank of any provincial governor in the Fatimid Caliphate.[64]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^The historians Guy le Strange,Moshe Gil,Muhammad Adnan Bakhit, and N. Hamash considered Ludd the capital before the founding ofRamla,while Goitein and Amikam Elad considered Jerusalem as the district's political-religious center before Ramla's founding.[16]
  2. ^In another version, a man of theJudham,Dab'an ibn Rawh ibn Zinba's son al-Hakam, seized power in Palestine in 750 during the Abbasid Revolution, after which Caliph Marwan II, who had entered the district during his flight to Egypt, appointed another al-Hakam's uncle, Abd Allah ibn Yazid ibn Rawh, but he was unable to wrest power from al-Hakam.[55]

References

edit
  1. ^Avni, Gideon (2014). "Shifting Paradigms for the Byzantine–Islamic Transition".The Byzantine-Islamic Transition in Palestine: An Archaeological Approach.Oxford:Oxford University Press.ISBN9780199684335.
  2. ^abcSourdel 1965,p. 910.
  3. ^abcDonner 1981,p. 115.
  4. ^abcWensinck 1960,p. 451.
  5. ^Donner 1981,p. 116.
  6. ^Donner 1981,p. 129.
  7. ^Sourdel 1965,pp. 910–911.
  8. ^abDonner 1981,p. 153.
  9. ^abcdeSourdel 1965,p. 911.
  10. ^Donner 1981,pp. 139, 152–153.
  11. ^Lecker 1989,p. 30, note 61.
  12. ^Luz 1997,p. 27.
  13. ^Luz 1997,p. 28.
  14. ^Ehrlich, Michael (2022).The Islamization of the Holy Land, 634-1800.Leeds, UK: Arc Humanities Press. pp. 3–4, 19–20, 38.ISBN978-1-64189-222-3.OCLC1302180905.
  15. ^abcdefEstakhriquoted byLe Strange, G.(1890).Palestine Under the Moslems: A Description of Syria and the Holy Land from A.D. 650 to 1500.London:Committee of thePalestine Exploration Fund.pp.25–30.OCLC1004386.
  16. ^abcLuz 1997,p. 30.
  17. ^abשור, נתן (2006). "רדיפות השומרונים בידי העבאסים והיעלמות היישוב השומרוני החקלאי". In שטרן, אפרים; אשל, חנן (eds.).ספר השומרונים[Book of the Samaritans] (in Hebrew) (2 ed.). ירושלים: יד יצחק בן-צבי; רשות העתיקות. pp. 587–590.ISBN965-217-202-2.
  18. ^abRubin, Milka (1998). "Arabization versus Islamization". In Kofsky, Arieh; G. Stroumsa, Guy (eds.).Sharing the Sacred: Religious Contacts and Conflicts in the Holy Land: First-Fifteenth Centuries CE.Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben Zvi. p. 161.Yet, in spite of the strong Arabization, they seem to have been a close-knit group with a strong religious and cultural identity, which they preserved through the centuries following the Arab conquest, and even through the crucial process of Arabization. In the case of the Arabicized Melkite community, Arabization should not be confused with Islamization. [...] the existing evidence concerning the Palestinian Melkite community throughout the early Muslim period indicates that it battled successfully in its confrontation with Islam, preserving its social structure and maintaining its group identity and communal cohesion by accepting the Arabic culture, yet adhering strongly to its Christian identity.
  19. ^Ellenblum, Ronnie (2010).Frankish Rural Settlement in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-511-58534-0.OCLC958547332.From the data given above it can be concluded that the Muslim population of Central Samaria, during the early Muslim period, was not an autochthonous population which had converted to Christianity. They arrived there either by way of migration or as a result of a process of sedentarization of the nomads who had filled the vacuum created by the departing Samaritans at the end of the Byzantine period [...] To sum up: in the only rural region in Palestine in which, according to all the written and archeological sources, the process of Islamization was completed already in the twelfth century, there occurred events consistent with the model propounded by Levtzion and Vryonis: the region was abandoned by its original sedentary population and the subsequent vacuum was apparently filled by nomads who, at a later stage, gradually became sedentarized
  20. ^Chris Wickham,Framing the Early Middle Ages; Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–900,Oxford University press 2005. p. 130. "In Syria and Palestine, where there were already Arabs before the conquest, settlement was also permitted in the old urban centres and elsewhere, presumably privileging the political centres of the provinces."
  21. ^Gideon Avni,The Byzantine-Islamic Transition in Palestine: An Archaeological Approach,Oxford University Press 2014 pp. 312–324, 329 (theory of imported population unsubstantiated);.
  22. ^Van Bladel, Kevin (2021).Arabicization, Islamization, and the Colonies of the Conquerors, in "Late Antique Responses to the Arab Conquests".ISBN9789004500648.
  23. ^Crone 1980,p. 225, note 210.
  24. ^abcLevy-Rubin, Milka (2000). "New Evidence Relating to the Process of Islamization in Palestine in the Early Muslim Period: The Case of Samaria".Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient.43(3): 257–276.doi:10.1163/156852000511303.ISSN0022-4995.JSTOR3632444.
  25. ^Ehrlich 2022,p. 33.
  26. ^לוי-רובין, מילכה (2006). שטרן, אפרים; אשל, חנן (eds.).ספר השומרונים[Book of the Samaritans; The Continuation of the Samaritan Chronicle of Abu l-Fath] (in Hebrew) (2 ed.). ירושלים: יד יצחק בן צבי, רשות העתיקות, המנהל האזרחי ליהודה ושומרון: קצין מטה לארכיאולוגיה. pp. 562–586.ISBN965-217-202-2.
  27. ^M. Levy-Rubin, "New evidence relating to the process of Islamization in Palestine in the Early Muslim Period - The Case of Samaria", in:Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient,43 (3), pp. 257–276, 2000,Springer
  28. ^Tramontana, Felicita (2013). "The Poll Tax and the Decline of the Christian Presence in the Palestinian Countryside in the 17th Century".Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient.56(4–5).JSTOR40131314.
  29. ^abBlankinship 1993,p. 87.
  30. ^Blankinship 1993,p. 87, note 489.
  31. ^Humphreys 1990,p. 73.
  32. ^Luz 1997,pp. 30–31.
  33. ^Friedmann 1992,pp. 192–193.
  34. ^Humphreys 1990,p. 74.
  35. ^Humphreys 1990,pp. 72–74.
  36. ^Crone 1980,p. 227, note 235.
  37. ^abGundelfinger & Verkinderen 2020,p. 264.
  38. ^Mayer 1952,p. 185.
  39. ^Elad 1999,p. 24.
  40. ^Crone 1980,p. 100.
  41. ^Crone 1980,p. 125.
  42. ^Sharon 1966,pp. 370–371.
  43. ^Sharon 2004,pp. 230–232.
  44. ^Crone 1980,p. 124.
  45. ^Crone 1980,pp. 125–126.
  46. ^Eisener 1997,p. 892.
  47. ^Kennedy 2004,pp. 105–106.
  48. ^Crone 1980,p. 127.
  49. ^Gil 1997,p. 84.
  50. ^Crone 1980,p. 129.
  51. ^Hillenbrand 1989,p. 190.
  52. ^Hillenbrand 1989,p. 193.
  53. ^Williams 1985,p. 3.
  54. ^Williams 1985,pp. 6, 170.
  55. ^Williams 1985,p. 171.
  56. ^Williams 1985,pp. 198, 204, 208.
  57. ^abcdGil 1997,p. 842.
  58. ^Crone 1980,p. 185.
  59. ^abGil 1997,pp. 284, 842.
  60. ^Crone 1980,p. 177.
  61. ^Saliba 1985,p. 13.
  62. ^Lev 2003,pp. 46–47.
  63. ^Lev 2003,pp. 45, 50.
  64. ^Sharon 1997,p. 134.
  65. ^Kennedy 2004,p. 289.

Sources

edit
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jund_Filastin&oldid=1233723407"