Karyogamyis the final step in the process of fusing together twohaploideukaryoticcells, and refers specifically to the fusion of the twonuclei.Before karyogamy, each haploid cell has one complete copy of the organism'sgenome.In order for karyogamy to occur, thecell membraneandcytoplasmof each cell must fuse with the other in a process known asplasmogamy.Once within the joined cell membrane, the nuclei are referred to aspronuclei.Once the cell membranes, cytoplasm, and pronuclei fuse, the resulting single cell isdiploid,containing two copies of the genome. This diploid cell, called azygoteorzygosporecan then entermeiosis(a process of chromosome duplication, recombination, and division, to produce four new haploid cells), or continue to divide bymitosis.Mammalian fertilization uses a comparable process to combine haploid sperm and egg cells (gametes) to create a diploid fertilized egg.
The term karyogamy comes from theGreekkaryo-(from κάρυονkaryon) 'nut' and γάμοςgamos'marriage'.[1]
Importance in haploid organisms
editHaploid organisms such asfungi,yeast,andalgaecan have complexcell cycles,in which the choice betweensexualorasexual reproductionis fluid, and often influenced by the environment. Some organisms, in addition to their usual haploid state, can also exist as diploid for a short time, allowinggenetic recombinationto occur. Karyogamy can occur within either mode of reproduction: during the sexual cycle or insomatic(non-reproductive) cells.[2]
Thus, karyogamy is the key step in bringing together two sets of different genetic material which canrecombineduring meiosis. In haploid organisms that lack sexual cycles, karyogamy can also be an important source ofgenetic variationduring the process of forming somaticdiploidcells. Formation of somatic diploids circumvents the process ofgameteformation during the sexual reproduction cycle and instead creates variation within the somatic cells of an already developed organism, such as afungus.[2]
Role in sexual reproduction
editThe role of karyogamy in sexual reproduction can be demonstrated most simply by single-celledhaploidorganisms such as the algae of genusChlamydomonasor the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae.Such organisms exist normally in a haploid state, containing only one set of chromosomes per cell. However, the mechanism remains largely the same among all haploid eukaryotes.[3]
When subjected to environmental stress, such as nitrogen starvation in the case ofChlamydomonas,cells are induced to formgametes.[4]Gamete formationin single-celled haploid organisms such as yeast is calledsporulation,resulting in many cellular changes that increase resistance to stress. Gamete formation in multicellular fungi occurs in thegametangia,an organ specialized for such a process, usually by meiosis.[5]When oppositemating typesmeet, they are induced to leave the vegetative cycle and enter the mating cycle. In yeast, there are two mating types, a and α.[6]In fungi, there can be two, four, or even up to 10,000 mating types, depending on the species.[7][8]Mate recognition in the simplest eukaryotes is achieved throughpheromonesignaling, which induces shmoo formation (a projection of the cell) and begins the process of microtubule organization and migration. Pheromones used in mating type recognition are often peptides, but sometimes trisporic acid or other molecules, recognized by cellular receptors on the opposite cell. Notably, pheromone signaling is absent in higher fungi such as mushrooms.[3]
The cell membranes and cytoplasm of these haploid cells then fuse together in a process known asplasmogamy.This results in a single cell with two nuclei, known aspronuclei.The pronuclei then fuse together in a well regulated process known as karyogamy. This creates a diploid cell known as azygote,or azygospore,[4]which can then entermeiosis,a process of chromosome duplication, recombination, and cell division, to create four new haploid gamete cells. One possible advantage of sexual reproduction is that it results in more genetic variability, providing the opportunity for adaptation through natural selection. Another advantage is efficient recombinational repair of DNA damages during meiosis. Thus, karyogamy is the key step in bringing together a variety of genetic material in order to ensure recombination in meiosis.[3]
TheAmoebozoais a large group of mostly single-celled species that have recently been determined to have the machinery for karyogamy andmeiosis.[9]Since the Amoeboza branched off early from the eukaryotic family tree, this finding suggests that karyogamy and meiosis were present early ineukaryoticevolution.
Cellular mechanisms
editPronuclear migration
editThe ultimate goal of karyogamy is fusion of the two haploid nuclei. The first step in this process is the movement of the two pronuclei toward each other, which occurs directly after plasmogamy. Each pronucleus has aspindle pole bodythat is embedded in thenuclear envelopeand serves as an attachment point formicrotubules.Microtubules, an important fiber-like component of thecytoskeleton,emerge at the spindle pole body. The attachment point to the spindle pole body marks the minus end, and the plus end extends into thecytoplasm.The plus end has normal roles inmitotic division,but during nuclear congression, the plus ends are redirected. The microtubule plus ends attach to the opposite pronucleus, resulting in the pulling of the two pronuclei toward each other.[10]
Microtubule movement is mediated by a family ofmotor proteinsknown askinesins,such as Kar3 in yeast. Accessory proteins, such as Spc72 in yeast, act as a glue, connecting the motor protein,spindle pole bodyand microtubule in a structure known as the half-bridge. Other proteins, such as Kar9 and Bim1 in yeast, attach to the plus end of the microtubules. They are activated by pheromone signals to attach to the shmoo tip. A shmoo is a projection of the cellular membrane which is the site of initial cell fusion in plasmogamy. After plasmogamy, the microtubule plus ends continue to grow towards the opposite pronucleus. It is thought that the growing plus end of the microtubule attaches directly to the motor protein of the opposite pronucleus, triggering a reorganization of the proteins at the half-bridge. The force necessary for migration occurs directly in response to this interaction.[11]
Two models of nuclear congression have been proposed: the sliding cross-bridge, and the plus end model. In the sliding cross-bridge model, the microtubules runantiparallelto each other for the entire distance between the two pronuclei, formingcross-linksto each other, and each attaching to the opposite nucleus at the plus end. This is the favored model. The alternative model proposes that the plus ends contact each other midway between the two pronuclei and only overlap slightly. In either model, it is believed that microtubule shortening occurs at the plus end and requires Kar3p (in yeast), a member of a family ofkinesin-like proteins.[10]
Microtubuleorganization in thecytoskeletonhas been shown to be essential for proper nuclear congression during karyogamy. Defective microtubule organization causes total failure of karyogamy, but does not totally interrupt meiosis and spore production in yeast. The failure occurs because the process of nuclear congression cannot occur without functional microtubules. Thus, the pronuclei do not approach close enough to each other to fuse together, and their genetic material remains separated.[12]
Pronuclear fusion (karyogamy)
editMerging of thenuclear envelopesof the pi occurs in three steps: fusion of the outer membrane, fusion of the inner membrane, and fusion of the spindle pole bodies. In yeast, several members of the Kar family of proteins, as well as aprotamine,are required for the fusion of nuclear membranes. The protamine Prm3 is located on the outer surface of each nuclear membrane, and is required for the fusion of the outer membrane. The exact mechanism is not known. Kar5, a kinesin-like protein, is necessary to expand the distance between the outer and inner membranes in a phenomenon known as bridge expansion. Kar8 and Kar2 are thought to be necessary to the fusing of the inner membranes.[13] As described above, the reorganization of accessory and motor proteins during pronuclear migration also serves to orient the spindle pole bodies in the correct direction for efficient nuclear congression. Nuclear congression can still take place without this pre-orientation of spindle pole bodies, but it is slower. Ultimately the two pronuclei combine the contents of theirnucleoplasmsand form a single envelope around the result.[11]
Role in somatic diploids
editAlthough fungi are normally haploid, diploid cells can arise by two mechanisms. The first is a failure of the mitotic spindle during regular cell division, and does not involve karyogamy. The resulting cell can only be geneticallyhomozygoussince it is produced from one haploid cell. The second mechanism, involving karyogamy of somatic cells, can produceheterozygousdiploids if the two nuclei differ in genetic information. The formation of somatic diploids is generally rare, and is thought to occur because of a mutation in the karyogamy repressor gene (KR).[2]
There are, however, a few fungi that exist mostly in the diploid state. One example isCandida albicans,a fungus that lives in the gastrointestinal tracts of many warm blooded animals, including humans. Although usually innocuous,C. albicanscan turn pathogenic and is a particular problem in immunosuppressed patients. Unlike with most other fungi, diploid cells of different mating types fuse to create tetraploid cells which subsequently return to the diploid state by losing chromosomes.[14]
Similarities to and differences from mammalian fertilization
editMammals, including humans, also combine genetic material from two sources - father and mother - infertilization.This process is similar to karyogamy. As with karyogamy, microtubules play an important part in fertilization and are necessary for the joining of the sperm and egg (oocyte) DNA.[15]Drugs such asgriseofulvinthat interfere with microtubules prevent the fusion of the sperm and egg pronuclei. The gene KAR2 which plays a large role in karyogamy has a mammalian analog called Bib/GRP78.[16]In both cases, genetic material is combined to create a diploid cell that has greater genetic diversity than either original source.[17]Instead of fusing in the same way as lower eukaryotes do in karyogamy, the sperm nucleus vesiculates and its DNA decondenses. The sperm centriole acts as a microtubule organizing center and forms an aster which extends throughout the egg until contacting the egg's nucleus. The two pronuclei migrate toward each other and then fuse to form a diploid cell.[18]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^"karyogamy".The Free Dictionary.
- ^abcCole, Garry T. (2012-12-02).Biology Of Conidial Fungi.Elsevier.ISBN9780323143547.
- ^abcNi, Min; Marianna Feretzaki; Sheng Sun; Xuying Wang; Joseph Heitman (December 2011)."Sex in Fungi".Annual Review of Genetics.45:405–430.doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132536.PMC3310392.PMID21942368.
- ^abRaven, Peter H.; Ray Franklin Evert; Susan E. Eichhorn (January 2005).Biology of Plants.Macmillan.ISBN9780716710073.
- ^Ünal, E.; A. Amon (2011-01-01)."Gamete Formation Resets the Aging Clock in Yeast".Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.76:73–80.doi:10.1101/sqb.2011.76.011379.ISSN0091-7451.PMC3912942.PMID21890640.
- ^Guthrie, Christine; Gerald R. Fink (2004).Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology.Gulf Professional Publishing.ISBN9780121827786.
- ^Volk, Tom."Tom Volk's Fungus of the Month for February 2000".Tom Volk's Fungi.University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.Retrieved14 December2013.
- ^Hodge, Kathie."A fungus walks into a singles bar".Cornell Mushroom Blog.Cornell University.Retrieved23 November2013.
- ^Hofstatter PG, Brown MW, Lahr DJG (November 2018)."Comparative Genomics Supports Sex and Meiosis in Diverse Amoebozoa".Genome Biol Evol.10(11): 3118–3128.doi:10.1093/gbe/evy241.PMC6263441.PMID30380054.
- ^abMolk, Jeffrey N.; E. D. Salmon; Kerry Bloom (2006-01-02)."Nuclear Congression Is Driven by Cytoplasmic Microtubule Plus End Interactions in S. cerevisiae".The Journal of Cell Biology.172(1): 27–39.doi:10.1083/jcb.200510032.ISSN0021-9525.JSTOR4134115.PMC2063526.PMID16380440.
- ^abGibeaux, Romain; Antonio Z. Politi; François Nédélec; Claude Antony; Michael Knop (2013-02-01)."Spindle pole body-anchored Kar3 drives the nucleus along microtubules from another nucleus in preparation for nuclear fusion during yeast karyogamy".Genes & Development.27(3): 335–349.doi:10.1101/gad.206318.112.ISSN0890-9369.PMC3576518.PMID23388829.
- ^Yamashita, Akira; Yoshihiro Fujita; Masayuki Yamamoto (2013-06-05)."Proper Microtubule Structure Is Vital for Timely Progression through Meiosis in Fission Yeast".PLOS ONE.8(6): e65082.Bibcode:2013PLoSO...865082Y.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065082.PMC3673945.PMID23755176.
- ^Melloy, Patricia; Shu Shen; Erin White; Mark D. Rose (2009-09-01)."Distinct Roles for Key Karyogamy Proteins during Yeast Nuclear Fusion".Molecular Biology of the Cell.20(17): 3773–3782.doi:10.1091/mbc.E09-02-0163.ISSN1059-1524.PMC2735476.PMID19570912.
- ^Noble, Suzanne M.; Johnson, Alexander D. (December 2007). "Genetics of Candida albicans, a Diploid Human Fungal Pathogen".Annual Review of Genetics.41(1): 193–211.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.170146.PMID17614788.S2CID31819376.
- ^Schatten, G; Simerly, C; Schatten, H (Jun 1985)."Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.82(12): 4152–6.Bibcode:1985PNAS...82.4152S.doi:10.1073/pnas.82.12.4152.PMC397953.PMID3889922.
- ^Rose, Mark D.; Misra, Leanne M.; Vogel, Joseph P. (1 June 1989)."KAR2, a karyogamy gene, is the yeast homolog of the mammalian BiP/GRP78 gene".Cell.57(7): 1211–1221.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90058-5.PMID2661018.
- ^Wassarman, PM; Jovine, L; Litscher, ES (Feb 2001). "A profile of fertilization in mammals".Nature Cell Biology.3(2): E59–64.doi:10.1038/35055178.PMID11175768.S2CID6172791.
- ^Wassarman, Paul M.; Jovine, Luca; Litscher, Eveline S. (1 February 2001). "A profile of fertilization in mammals".Nature Cell Biology.3(2): E59–E64.doi:10.1038/35055178.PMID11175768.S2CID6172791.