Khors[a]is aSlavic godof uncertain functions mentioned since the 12th century. Generally interpreted as a sun god, sometimes as a moon god. The meaning of the theonym is also unknown: most often his name has been combined with the Iranian word for sun, such as the Persianxoršid,or the Ossetianxor,but modern linguists strongly criticize such an etymology, and other native etymologies are proposed instead.

Member ofVladimir'spantheon
Texts
  • Primary Chronicle
  • The Tale of Igor's Campaign
  • The Virgin Mary’s Journey through the Torments
  • Sermon by Saint Gregory, Found in the Comments...
  • Sermon by the Holy Father Saint John Chrysostom...
  • Sermon by One Who Loves Christ...
  • Sermon and Revelation by the Holy Apostles

Sources

edit

Khors is the most frequently mentioned Slavic god, after Perun.[1]He first appears in thePrimary Chronicleletopisalong with other gods to whomVladimir the Greaterected statues:

And Vladimir began to reign alone in Kiev. And he placed idols on the hill outside the palace: aPerunin wood with a silver head and a gold moustache, and Khors,DazhdbogandStribogandSimarglandMokosh.And they offered sacrifices and called them gods, and they took their sons and daughters to them and sacrificed them to the devils. And they profaned the earth with their sacrifices, and Rus’ and that hill were profaned by blood. But God the merciful, who does not wish the death of sinners, on that hill stands today the church of Saint Vasilij, as we will relate later.[2]

Old East Slavic original text
И нача къняжити Володимиръ въ Кыевѣ единъ, и постави кумиры на хълму, вънѣ двора теремьнаго: Перуна древяна, а главу его сьребряну, а усъ златъ, и Хърса, Дажьбога и Стрибога и Сѣмарьгла и Мокошь. И жьряху имъ, наричюще я богы, и привожаху сыны своя и дъщери, и жьряху бѣсомъ. И осквьрняху землю требами своими; и осквьрни ся кръвьми земля Русьская и хълмъ тъ. Нъ преблагыи Богъ не хотя съмьрти грѣшьникомъ, на томь хълмѣ нынѣ цьркы есть святаго Василия, якоже послѣди съкажемъ.
— Primary Chronicle

The second source mentioning the god isThe Tale of Igor's Campaign:"Prince Vseslavwas a judge for his subjects, he distributed cities among princes, but by night he ran like a wolf, fromKievhe ran toTmutarakan,before the cock crowed, as a wolf he ran along the road of the great Khors. "[3]

God is also mentioned in the apocryphal workSermon and Apocalypse of the Holy Apostles,which mentions Perun and Khors as old men, and Khors is credited with real life inCyprus.[4]Khors also appears in the apocryphal textConversation of the Three Saints,in whichSt. Basil,St. Gregory the Theologian,andSt. John Chrysostomconverse. St. John asks: "What was thunder made from?", St. Basil replies: "There are two angels of thunder. For this, the ancientGreekPerun, Khors isJewish.And there are two angels of lightning ".[5]This text combines Slavic,Christian,andBogomiltraditions.[6][4]He also occurs in other letopis-dependent sources.[4]

In proper nouns

edit

Mikhail Vasil'yev cited a number ofhydronymsfrom theNovgorod-Severianregion (e.g., Khorsovo swamp, Khorsov reservoir) from the 16th-18th centuries,toponymsinVolhyniafrom the 10th-12th centuries, orHŭrsovoinBulgaria,to the right of theDanube.[7]Andrey Beskov notes that inBorova region(Ukraine), not far from the village ofHorokhovatka[uk],there was the village of Horsivka, which is now under theOskol reservoir.Significantly, among the inhabitants of this village were bearers of the surnameKhors.[8]

God was also to be preserved in the Old Serbian name Хьрсь, Old Bulgarian Хръсъ,[9]SerbianХрс,Hrs,Хрсовик,Hrsovik,[10]Old East Slavic Хорсъ[9]in analogy to the Polish nameDadźbóg,from the godDazhbog.[11]It is also possible that he was preserved in the Old Czech nameChorúš.[10]It has been proposed that the Serbian names should be regarded as alterations of the Greek name Χρυσης,Khrisis,or Χρυσος,Khrisos,but according toAleksander Brücknerthis is unwarranted: these names are not Christian names, so there was no reason for the Serbs to adopt them, and Χρυσ- is spelled simply askhris-.[12]

Etymology

edit
Christian, propaganda image of Khors, Georg A. Schleusing,La Religion ancienne et moderne des Moscovites,1698.

In Old Russian sources, this theonym is noted as Xърсъ,Xŭrsŭ,Хорсъ,Xorsŭ,Хъросъ,Xŭrosŭ,and in modern Russian literature it is written asKhors(Russian:Хорс), similarly spelled byMaciej Stryjkowski-Khorsum(Polish:Chorsum,modernChors). In English, depending on the transliteration system, the name is written asKhors,Hors,orXors.[1][4]

Iranian etymology

edit

Currently, the most popular view regarding the etymology of thetheonymKhors isIranian,and this etymology has been proposed since the 19th century. The Russian historian Pёtr Butkov, who called Khors "the SlavicApollo",was one of the first to connect his name with thePersianخورشید,xuršitand theOssetianxur,xor"sun," and with the Ossetianxorošŭ,хоrsŭ,xorsumeaning "good".[13]Iranianxvar"halo",Indianhāra,hāras"fire"[14]or Persianxoršid"sun",Xuršid"sun-god" are also proposed.[13][15]The Iranian word was also supposed to be the root word forKrones,the sky god in theVogulsandOstyaks,and for the wordkvar"sky", "air" in theVotyak language.[14]

Vladimir Toporovbelieved that the nameKhorswas brought toKyiv,along with the solar cult, by soldiers fromKhwarazm,who were supposedly stationed there during the reign ofVladimir the Great,but this theory has been heavily criticized. Mikhail Vasil'yev stated that the name could not have been borrowed fromMiddle Persian,but fromSarmatian-Alanpeoples in the first millenniumBC[16](so-called Iranian inversion).

Besides the Iranian etymology, there were other theories. For example, an early loan from Ossetianxorz"good" was proposed, which would also explain theRussianword хороший,khoroshiy"good," which was originally supposed to mean "of Khors, belonging to Khors", but this possibility was rejected by Vasmer. Toporov, who also rejected borrowing from Ossetian, wrote:

The only Russian word which has really been connected by researchers with the name ofKhorsis –khoroshiy.This link now appears unquestionable [...]. Unquestionable is also the direction of the word formation:Khorskhoroshiy.It is only the concrete Iranian source of the nameHorsthat raises doubts.[17]

Criticism

edit

Borrowing from Iranian languages has been accepted by religious scholars without much complaint, but linguists, such asMax Vasmer,point outphoneticproblems. Iranianhva-does not explain theSlavicshort vowel ъ (ŭ), andšcould not in Slavic languages remain ass,but according to theruki ruleshould remain either asх(h) or asš(sh) in case the word was borrowed after the rule completion.[18]

Iranian etymology also has historical problems. Khors could not have been borrowed during the reign of Vladimir the Great because by that timePersiahad already converted toIslam,and the wordXoršidin Persian meant only "sun" and had no religious connotations. The name cannot be derived from theAvestanHvar(because of the final-s), orhvarə хšаētəm:the expression was shortened toxwaršēδ/xoršidin Middle Persian during theSassanid dynasty,at which time sun worship was transferred to the godMitra.Additionally, at an early stage,iconoclasmprevailed in Persia and idols of Iranian gods were replaced with sacred fires. It is unclear, then, how theEastern Slavswould have borrowed the wordxwaršēδ/xoršidfrom Persia in such a short time, made a radical phonetic change, and placed Khors so high in the pantheon.[18]Vasil'yev tried to solve this problem by suggesting the existence of a hypothetical Sarmatian-Alan word*xors/*xūrs"King-Sun" obtained through a complex chain of assumptions, but here too the phonetic problems mentioned earlier arise.[18]

A comprehensive critique of Iranian theory was also made by Andrey Beskov.[19]

Slavic etymologies

edit

From Proto-Indo-European*kr̥ḱós

edit

Aleksander Brückner(1918) also proposed a Slavic origin of the theonym. According to him,Chъrsъin Polish would sound likecharsand he finds this word in Polish dated phrasesprzecharsłakozaorwycharsłmężczyznameaning "emaciated, haggard, pinched, drawn" creature, or in Czech wordskrsati,krsnouti"to emaciate, haggard",krsek"dwarf",zakrsly,krs"dwarf shrub"with typical interchange ofchandk– the Polish word with preserved originalkiskarślak"knotty tree", or toponymesKarsy.[12]The Proto-Slavic form of these words is reconstructed as the adjective*kъrsъ"declined, skinny, dwarf", the verb*kъrsati"to decrease, decline",*krsnąti"to lose weight" from PIE.*kr̥ḱós"skinny" (PIE→ PSs).[20][9]This interpretation was supported by Michał Łuczyński (2020). According to him, the Proto-Slavic form of theonym,*Xъrsъ,from the earlier*Kъrsъ,is formally identical with the surnames: Old Serbian Хьрсь and Old Bulgarian Xrъсъ, as well as the toponyms: Old Polish*Karsand*Chars,SerbianHrsand Old RussianХорсъand others, and is derived from the adjective*kъrsъ"skinny". This reconstruction is etymologically correct, and semantically consistent with the lunar interpretation – moon as "skinny", which may have been related to lunar cycles.[9]

From Proto-Indo-European*kʷr̥s-

edit

According to the Slovak linguist Martin Pukanec (2013), the theonymKhorsdoes not have a Proto-Slavic genesis. He points here to a Slavic TarT/TorT (T = any consonant) switch that occurred around 800. Proto-Slavic TorT in East Slavic languages passed into ToroT, so Proto-Slavic*Xorshould pass into East Slavic*Xoro,and such a notation is not confirmed by the sources. According to him, there is also no reliable attestation of this theonym in West and South Slavic languages. In that case, according to Pukanec, the theonym was borrowed from Persianxuršēt"shining sun", but he does not address the criticism of such etymology by other linguists presented earlier.[21]

He also points to another possibility. Proto-Slavic TorT passed intoChurch Slavonicas TъrT and TrъT, which would explain both notations*Xorsъand*Xъrsъand recognizes the*Xъrsъnotation as primary. As the PS*xmay derive from PIE*kor*g,when searching for the PIE etymology of the word, attention must be paid primarily to theroundedphones*kʷ,*gʷ,and*gʷʰ;the Proto-Indo-European stem can thus be reconstructed as*kʷr̥s-or*gʷr̥s-or*gʷʰr̥s-.Of the aforementioned stems, only one,*kʷr̥s-,is found inJulius Pokorny'sIndogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch,who reconstructed this stem usingGreekπρῖνος,prînos"oak (holly) ",Gaulishprenne"large tree",Old High Germanhorst,hurst"bush, thicket" orSlovenehrást"oak", which, like the theonym in question, contain a vowel between-r-and-s-.Such a reconstruction would indicate functions similar to those ofPerun,the god of storms and oaks.[21]

Interpretations

edit

Khors-Dazhbog – Sun god

edit

Scholars who assume an Iranian etymology most often attribute the solar features to Khors. The main argument is the root of the theonym meaning "sun" in the first place, regardless of which exact word that root was. Moreover, according toThe Tale of Igor's Campaign,Prince Vseslav,who "came to Tmutarakani before the cocks" and "ran along the road of the great Khors", traveled from west to east and thus reached the castle before the cocks crowed, and in this way "overtook" the Sun.[22]

It has also been pointed out in the text of thePrimary Chroniclewhere, when listing the statues of the gods, only between Khors andDazhbog,the sun god, noconjunction"and" is used (unlike the rest of the gods), and this, according to many scholars, would suggest that Khors is another name of Dadzbog, his hypostasis, or that they are related in some other way.[14][23]Such a view was supported e.g. byHenryk Łowmiański,according to whomDazhbogwas an explanation ofKhors.He pointed out, however, that he was not sure if conjunction wasn't there.[24]Brückner argued against this view, claiming that the lack of conjunctions was irrelevant, and he considered the association of Dazhbog with Khors to be unjustified.[25]An analysis of the spelling of Old East Slavic sources confirms Brückner's view: the lack of a conjunction often occurs in the enumeration ofchoronyms,ethnonyms,hydronyms,anthroponyms,and theonyms, e.g.: copy ofNovgorod First Chronicle:"... истрибасенмарекламокошь",Sermon and Revelation by the Holy Apostles:"пероунаихорсадыяитрояна",Sermon by Saint Gregory, found in the comments:"молятся (...) нероуноу.хорсу мокоши".[26]

Moon god

edit

Some scholars, who also assume an Iranian etymology, believe that Chors was a lunar god, and that the meaning of his name refers not to the rays of the sun, but to the rays of the moon.[22]

It is pointed out here that Vseslav was called a "wolf" andwerewolfismis associated with the moon, while the prince's journey itself takes place at night when the sun is absent from the sky, thus he could not cut the path of the sun but the moon.[27][28]Additionally, it is also pointed out that Tmutarakan is not located from Kyiv to the east, but to the southeast.[22]A probable misunderstanding of the phrase "to the hens" is also pointed out. In Old East Slavic this phrase meant "until late; at night", "until dawn, before dawn", and Russian dial. phrase "до вторых кочетов" meant "until late; after midnight' (literally:" to the other roosters "). As phrases beginning with" до "meant night and morning phrases starting with" со "(cf. со вторыми кочетами), it can be concluded that Vseslav arrived in the city at night, not in the morning.[29]Łuczynski also points out that the epithet "great" (OES великому,velikomu) used in relation to Khors inThe Tale,which is usually[29]taken as an argument for the solar interpretation, can be understood differently: in Slavic folklore the epithet "great" is often used in relation to the moon, e.g. thePolishwielki księżyc,Serbo-CroatianandSlovenianvelik mesec,and he further compares the Old Russian phrase to the Old Norsekenningmána vegr"sky", literally "the way of the moon".[29]

The interpretation of the nameKhorsas "emaciated" was supported by linguist Wanda Budziszewska. She reports that the waning moon was called "puny, frail" among the Slavs: Polish dial. (Podhaleand theKrakówarea)wietek,wiotek,Old Czechvetech,Belarusianv́òtakand Russianvétoch.In Old Polish, the wordwiotchymeant "frail because of wear, use, old age"[30](PS*vetъxъ).

Alleged idol

edit
Stone babafound near Pskov. According to Vunderer's description it representsUslad,and according to Kirpichnikov's interpretation Khors orDazhbog.

The German traveler Johann David Wunderer, who traveled in Russia from 1589 to 1590 and describedPskovin his memoir, mentioned the statues of Khors andUsladthat were supposed to be located near Pskov:

In front of the town we saw two idols, set up in olden times by the priests who worshipped them, namely, Usad, whose stone statue holds a cross in his hand, (and) Khors, who stands on a serpent, with a sword in one hand and a thunderbolt (literally, a ray of fire - A.K.) in the other.

In his diary, Wunderer described Pskov freshly, although when he was editing the manuscript, he added elements that are borrowed from other sources, and they add more detailed information that, however, are easily identifiable. Wunderer could not have known the names of the gods depicted on the stone primarily because the Uslad he mentions is in fact apseudodeity,his name came about as a result of a distortion of a passage inPrimary Chroniclein which a golden statue ofPerunis described,Sigismund von Herbersteinrecognized the wordgolden(us zlat) as an independent nameUslad,and he never existed in the Russian pantheon. Many historians considered the mentioned passage unreliable.[31]

Wunderer realized that a field camp ofStephen Báthory,whobesieged Pskovin 1581-1582, had once been located near the statues, and this information led to the location of the statues he described. The camp was located south of Pskov and lay on both sides of the Promiezhitsa stream, which separated the flat terrain around the city from the wooded hills and mountains that stretched all the way to the Cheremcha river, and the statues must have been located near it. The existence of the idol was unexpectedly confirmed when, during excavations in 1897, the so-calledstone baba(a conventional name for stone statues depicting people in Eastern Europe) was found between Promiezhitsa and the factory. The statue was probably not found in its original place, but that place must have been nearby anyway. DuringWorld War II,the statue, which was in the Pskov Museum, was lost, but photographs from 1928-1929 have survived. The idol was about 100 cm. long, and had a cross on its chest, which was made at the same time as the rest of the sculpture, but the idol was deliberately damaged, and only the head is preserved in good condition.[31]

According to Russian archaeologistAnatoliy Kirpichnikov[ru]the figure is related to the Slavic paganism. The location of the statue and the sign of the cross coincide exactly with Wunderer's description. The cross, which is an ancient symbol of the sun, is supposed to testify to the relationship of the god in the statue with the sun, and the statue itself is supposed to represent Khors orDazhbog.[31]Some researchers have suggested that the statue belongs to Christian culture. The statue is dated to the 8th to 10th century.[32]

References

edit
Notes
  1. ^Russian:Хорс[xˈors],Old East Slavic:Хърсъ, Хорсъ,romanized:Xǔrsǔ, Xorsǔ
References
  1. ^abBorissoff 2014,p. 9.
  2. ^Alvarez-Pedroza 2021,p. 277–278.
  3. ^Alvarez-Pedroza 2021,p. 305.
  4. ^abcdGieysztor 2006,p. 180-181.
  5. ^Alvarez-Pedroza 2021,p. 358.
  6. ^Santos Marinas 2013.
  7. ^Vasil'yev 1999,p. 17.
  8. ^Beskov 2010,p. 82-83.
  9. ^abcdŁuczyński 2020,p. 117.
  10. ^abVáňa 1990,p. 79.
  11. ^Brückner 1985,p. 156.
  12. ^abBrückner 1985,p. 157.
  13. ^abBorissoff 2014,p. 9-10.
  14. ^abcGieysztor 2006,p. 181.
  15. ^Szyjewski 2003,p. 108.
  16. ^Borissoff 2014.
  17. ^Borissoff 2014,p. 15–16.
  18. ^abcBorissoff 2014,p. 11-12.
  19. ^Borissoff 2014,p. 15.
  20. ^Trubachyov 1987,p. 240.
  21. ^abPukanec 2013,p. 49-52.
  22. ^abcSzyjewski 2003,p. 108-109.
  23. ^Szyjewski 2003,p. 108–109.
  24. ^Łowmiański 1979,p. 125-126.
  25. ^Brückner 1985,p. 140, 157.
  26. ^Łuczyński 2020,p. 38-39.
  27. ^Gieysztor 2006,p. 181-182..
  28. ^Brückner 1985,p. 18, 156..
  29. ^abcŁuczyński 2020,p. 40-41.
  30. ^Budziszewska 1999.
  31. ^abcKirpichnikov 1988,p. 34-37.
  32. ^"Культурные ценности – Жертвы войны - Идол".www.lostart.ru.Retrieved13 February2021.

Bibliography

edit

Further reading

edit