TheM10tank destroyer, formally known as3-inch gun motor carriage M10orM10 GMC,was an Americantank destroyerofWorld War II.After US entry into World War II and the formation of theTank Destroyer Force,a suitable vehicle was needed to equip the new battalions. By November 1941, the Army requested a vehicle with a gun in a fully rotating turret after other interim models were criticized for being too poorly designed. The prototype of the M10 was conceived in early 1942 and delivered in April that year. After appropriate changes to the hull and turret were made, the modified version was selected for production in June 1942 as the "3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10". It mounted the3-inch (76.2 mm) gun M7in a rotating turret on a modifiedM4 Shermantank chassis.
3-inch gun motor carriage M10 | |
---|---|
Type | Self-propelled anti-tank gun |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
Wars | World War II 1948 Arab–Israeli War |
Production history | |
Designer | U.S. Army Ordnance Department |
Designed | 1942 |
Manufacturer | Fisher Bodydivision ofGeneral Motors Ford Motor Company |
Unit cost | US$47,900(equivalent to $893,223 in 2023)[1] |
Produced |
|
No.built | 6,406 |
Variants | seeVariants |
Specifications (3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10/M10A1[2]) | |
Mass |
|
Length |
|
Width | 10 ft 0 in (3.05 m) |
Height | 9 ft 6 in (2.90 m) over antiaircraft machine gun |
Crew | 5 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver, assistant driver) |
Armor | 0.375 to 2.25 in (9.5 to 57.2 mm) |
Main armament | 3-inch gun M7(76.2 mm) in Mount M5 54 rounds |
Secondary armament | .50 caliber(12.7 mm)Browning M2HBmachine gun 300 rounds |
Engine |
|
Power/weight |
|
Transmission | Synchromesh,5 speeds forward, 1 reverse |
Suspension | Vertical volute spring suspension(VVSS) |
Fuel capacity |
|
Operational range |
|
Maximum speed |
|
It was built in two variants. The M10 GMC used the M4A2 Sherman chassis and the M10A1 used the M4A3 chassis. Production of the two models ran from September 1942 to December 1943 and October 1942 to November 1943, respectively.
The M10 was numerically the most important U.S. tank destroyer of World War II. It combined thin butsloped armorwith the M4's reliable drivetrain and a reasonably potentanti-tank gunmounted in an open-topped turret. Despite its obsolescence in the face of newer German tanks like thePanthermedium tank and the introduction of more powerful and better-designed types as replacements, the M10 remained in service until the end of the war. During World War II, the primary user of the M10 tank destroyer was the United States, but many supplied underLend-Leaseto theUnited Kingdom,CanadaandFree Frenchforces. Several dozen were also sent to theSoviet Union.Post-war, the M10 was given as military surplus to several countries, such asBelgium,Denmark,and theNetherlands,through theMutual Defense Assistance Actor acquired through other means by countries likeIsraeland theRepublic of China.
The M10 is often referred to by the nickname "Wolverine", an unofficial name that sometimes appeared in wartimeChrysleradvertising, but that was not used by U.S. troops;[3]the M10 was never officially assigned a nickname or referred to with one when used by American soldiers, who simply called it a "TD" (a nickname for any tank destroyer in general) beyond its formal designation.[4][5]
Doctrine
editU.S.combined armsdoctrine on the eve of World War II held that tanks should be designed to fulfill the role of forcing a breakthrough into enemy rear areas. Separate GHQ (General Headquarters) tank battalions would support infantry in destroying fixed enemy defenses, and armored divisions would then exploit the breakthrough to rush into the enemy's vulnerable rear areas. U.S. tanks were expected to fight any hostile tanks they encountered in their attack, but the mission of destroying massed enemy armored thrusts was assigned to a new branch, the Tank Destroyer Force developed in 1941. Tank destroyer units were meant to counter Germanblitzkriegtactics. Rather than rely on a "thin cordon" of anti-tank guns which would be defeated by a concentrated attack, the tank destroyer units were to be held as a reserve behind the battleline (at thecorpsor army level), and were to move quickly to the site of any massed enemy tank breakthrough.[6]They would maneuver aggressively and using ambush tactics to destroy enemy tanks; charging or chasing enemy tanks was explicitly prohibited.[7]This led to a requirement for very fast, well-armed vehicles. Though equipped with turrets (unlike most self-propelled anti-tank guns of the day), the typical American design was more heavily gunned, but more lightly armored, and thus more maneuverable, than a contemporary tank. The idea was to use speed and agility as a defense, rather than thick armor, to bring a powerful self-propelled gun into action against enemy tanks. Or more precisely, to use speed to deploy ahead of the attacking enemy, take up camouflaged and protected firing positions on their flanks if possible, and then open fire. If unable to destroy the enemy force or to force them to retreat, then mobility would be used to avoid enemy fire until the TDs could withdraw, preferably to move up and deploy for another ambush. Direct combat in the open against tanks was to be avoided whenever possible.
Development
editAfter the formation of the Tank Destroyer Tactical and Firing Center atCamp Hood,Texasin November 1941, the Army began testing to standardize on a configuration for the newtank destroyer battalions.The Tank Destroyer board began to examine several hundred Ordnance Department prototype proposals for a tank destroyer mounting a 3-inch gun, initially focusing the most interest on two:
- The T1, developed beginning in 1940 and standardized as the "M5 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage" in January 1941. It was a modifiedCleveland Tractor Companyairfield towing tractor mounting a development of the3-inch gun M1918anti-aircraft gun in a limited-traverse mounting[a]
- T24, developed beginning in October 1941. It was anM3 Leechassis mounting a 3-inch gun M1918 in a limited-traverse mounting. The T24 was initially rejected as being too tall and theT40was its improved derivative. The T40 was standardized as the "M9 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage" for limited production in May 1942 but never built.[b]
Meanwhile, as the final design developments of these two tank destroyers were underway, the Ordnance Department became dissatisfied and in November 1941 issued an additional specification for a tank destroyer with a 3-inch gun in a rotating turret. Design work began immediately. The3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35combined an early-productionM4A2 medium tankhull with the 3-inch gun M7 (also derived from the M1918 gun) from theM6 Heavy Tankin a cast, circular, open-topped turret. Using lessons learned from combat reports from thePhilippines,the armor on the sides and rear of the upper hull was changed from flat to sloped plates. This new test vehicle was designated the3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35E1.Prototypes of these two vehicles were delivered toAberdeen Proving Groundin April 1942, and the Army selected the T35E1 for further development on 2 May 1942.[8]The side and rear upper hull armor of the T35E1 was reduced from 1 inch (25 mm) to 0.75 inches (19 mm) in order to reduce the weight of the vehicle. The staff at Aberdeen Proving Ground was worried that the armor of the T35E1 was too thin, and so bosses for appliqué armor panels were added to the hull sides,glacis,and turret sides. As the cast turret was found to be difficult to manufacture, the design of the turret was changed to a slopedpentagonalshape made of welded armor plate.[9]In June 1942, the modified T35E1 was standardized as the3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10.By fall 1943, with its M5 and M9 competitors being eliminated from the design competition and their production contracts cancelled, the M10 was to become the United States' primary tank destroyer of the early war period.[citation needed]
As there were fears that the production of M4A2 chassis would be inadequate for M10 production, an alternate design, the 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10A1 based on the M4A3 medium tank chassis, was also authorized for production.[citation needed]
Design
editAmerican tank destroyer doctrine emphasized speed and gun power over armor. As a result, the M10's armor was thin, which made it vulnerable to most German anti-tank weapons. The thickness of the M10's armor ranged from3⁄8to2+1⁄4in (10 to 57 mm). The lower hull, being modified from that of a standard M4A2 or M4A3 Sherman tank, had 1-inch-thick (25 mm) armor on the sides and rear, and a1⁄2-inch-thick (13 mm) floor. The rounded, cast transmission cover was 2 inches (51 mm) thick. In a departure from its M4 Sherman parent, the M10 lacked the extra1⁄2-inch floor plate under the driver's and assistant driver's stations that provided them additional protection from mines.
The glacis plate was1+1⁄2inches (38 mm) thick, sloped at 55 degrees from the vertical. The sides and rear of the upper hull were3⁄4inch (19 mm) thick, sloped at 38 degrees from the vertical. The rear upper hull plate was used for storage of the vehicle's pioneer and maintenance tools: a 5-pound (2.3 kg) axe, a 5-foot (1.5 m) crowbar, a mattock handle and head, a double-sided 10-pound (4.5 kg) sledgehammer, and a track tensioning wrench. The sides and rear of the upper hull featured angled extensions or covers over the upper run of track. These extensions often got in the way of fitting "duckbill" extended end connectors, used to reduce ground pressure on soft ground, and were often removed, along with the front fenders, by maintenance units. The hull roof plate ranged from3⁄4inch (19 mm) thick over the driver's and assistant driver's stations and turret ring, to3⁄8inch (9.5 mm) thick over the engine compartment.
The manually rotated turret of the M10 was a pentagonal shape. The sides were sloped 15 degrees inward from the vertical and were 1 inch (25 mm) thick. The rear of the turret was also 1 inch thick. The partial roof on the front third of the turret opening was3⁄4inch (19 mm) thick. The triangular cast gun shield sported the thickest armor on the vehicle,2+1⁄4inches (57 mm). It was sloped at 45 degrees from the vertical and horizontal.
The M10 and M10A1 were mechanically identical except for their power plants. The M10 used theGeneral Motors 6046,a twin engine formed from two Detroit Diesel 6-71 inline engines mated to a single output. The tandem engine produced 375 horsepower (280 kW) at 2,100 rpm. One advantage of the GM 6046 was that the engines could be disconnected at will from the output and run independently. If one of the engines was damaged or destroyed, it could be disconnected and the other engine used to move the vehicle. The engine of the M10A1 was theFord GAA,an 8-cylinder derivative of an ill-fated V-12 aircraft engine project. It produced 450 horsepower (340 kW) at 2,600 rpm. When tested side by side in September 1943, the M10A1 was judged to have superior automotive performance to the M10. Even though it produced only slightly less torque, the M10A1's engine was far lighter, and used a common fuel like the rest of the Army's vehicles (gasoline). By the time the test results were released in February 1944, the Army was committed to using the M10 overseas. As a result, the M10A1 was kept in the United States for training.
The M10 and M10A1 had a crew of five; commander, gunner, loader, driver, and assistant driver. The driver and assistant driver (who also operated the vehicle's radio) were seated in the front hull and provided with periscopes. The unique design of the hull hatches to clear the gun mantlet meant that the driver's view directly to the left side was obstructed. He was provided with a second periscope at the edge of the hull for this purpose. The commander, gunner, and loader were all located in the turret. The commander sat on a folding seat at the right rear. The gunner, on the left side of the gun, normally stood to operate it, but he was also provided with a folding seat. The loader normally stood in the area behind the gun. A third folding seat was provided in the turret for the assistant driver in case he needed to assist the loader for any reason.
Unlike the M4 tanks it was based upon, the M10 lacked anauxiliary generator,which forced the crew to run the main engines in order to recharge the vehicle's batteries. The engine noise and smoke could attract enemy fire, especially in close quarters, where the M10 was vulnerable due to its thin armor and open-topped turret. The lack of an auxiliary generator was rectified with the introduction of the M36 tank destroyer.
Production
editMonth | M10 | M10A1 |
---|---|---|
September 1942 | 105 | |
October 1942 | 170 | 3 |
November 1942 | 137 | 18 |
December 1942 | 199 | 7 |
January 1943 | 276 | 56 |
February 1943 | 340 | 116 |
March 1943 | 330 | 150 |
April 1943 | 428 | 133 |
May 1943 | 416 | 123 |
June 1943 | 400 | 133 |
July 1943 | 402 | 124 |
August 1943 | 465 | 131 |
September 1943 | 498 | 49 |
October 1943 | 350 | 150 |
November 1943 | 237 | 220 |
December 1943 | 240 | |
January 1944 | 300 hulls | |
Total | 4,993 | 1,413 + 300 hulls |
Soon after reaching production, it was realized that the barrel of the 3-inch gun M7 was too heavy,[11]to the point where it prevented traverse of the turret on a slope of more than four degrees. As an attempt to improve the figure to fifteen degrees, the Army ordered that the trackgrousersand antiaircraft machine gun be stored on the rear of the turret. This did not solve the balance problem, and on 21 December 1942, triangular "quick fix" turret counterweights made of lead, mild steel, or cast iron were authorized. The mild steel parts weighed 2,400 pounds. Meanwhile, a set of wedge-shaped counterweights weighing 3,700 pounds total was designed by Fisher. The wedge-shaped weights began to be added to new vehicles at Fisher on 25 January 1943. By late December 1942, a second lock was added to the turret and a stirrup-shaped gun cradle was added to the rear deck to secure the gun for travel.
Since the track grousers could not be stored on the rear of the turret anymore, grouser racks that could be attached to the appliqué armor bosses on the hull were added to vehicles beginning in early April 1943. The M10 initially lacked any provision for indirect fire. In May 1943, an azimuth indicator and gunner's quadrant were added to the M10. The grouser racks and indirect fire equipment were often retrofitted to earlier vehicles. By late June 1943, it was realized that Fisher's initial counterweights were too heavy. Two newly designed counterweights reduced the total weight to 2,500 pounds and better distributed the weight of the gun. They resembled an upside-down "duck bill" shape when viewed from the side. To accommodate the new weights, the design of the upper rear of the turret was changed from sloped inwards to nearly vertical. In July 1943, the appliqué armor bosses on the hull sides and turret were dropped from production. The bosses on the glacis were retained. In late September 1943, a single M10 was tested with anOilgearhydraulic traversing motor that could traverse the turret even without the counterweights, but this modification was not pursued as the production contracts were reaching their end.
Production of 4,993 M10s by theFisher Bodydivision of General Motors at the Fisher Tank Arsenal inGrand Blanc,Michiganran from September 1942 through December 1943.Ford Motor Companybuilt 1,038 M10A1s from October 1942 until September 1943.[12]From September to November 1943, Fisher built the remaining 375 M10A1s. Fisher also completed a further 300 M10A1 hulls without turrets in January 1944 for direct conversion toM36 tank destroyers.From January to June 1944, 209 M10A1 vehicles were subsequently converted to M35 Prime Movers by removing the turret and adding the necessary equipment for them to tow the8-inch Gun M1and240 mm Howitzer M1
1,413 M10A1s, including the 300 hulls manufactured in January 1944, and 724 M10s were eventually converted intoM36 tank destroyers.[13]
Model | Quantity | Contract | Serial numbers | Registration numbers |
---|---|---|---|---|
M10 | 1,800 | 374-ORD-1880 | 3 through 1802 | 4040705 through 4042504 |
M10A1 | 1,038 | 374-ORD-1213 | 1803 through 2840 | 4046509 through 4047546 |
M10 | 1,200 | 374-ORD-1880 | 2841 through 4040 | 4081054 through 4082253 |
M10 | 1,117 | 374-ORD-1880 | 5991 through 7107 | 40110110 through 40111226 |
M10 | 876 | T-7581 | 7108 through 7983 | Unknown |
M10A1 | 375 | 374-ORD-1213 | 7984 through 8358 | 40112380 through 40112754 |
Armament
editPrimary
editThe M10 tank destroyer had an open-topped manually traversed turret mounting the 3-inch gun M7 in the M5 mount.[15]The gunner stood or sat on the left side of the gun, and aimed it using the M51 or M70G telescope. An M12A4 panoramic telescope was also provided on the right side of the turret for indirect fire use. The M10 carried 54 rounds of 3-inch ammunition, 48 of which were stowed in four racks in the sponsons, and 6 rounds in the upper rear of the turret. For combat use, the 3-inch Gun M7 could fire five types of ammunition:
- M79AP-Tshot
- M62/M62A1APCBC/HE-T shell
- M42A1 high explosive shell
- M88 HC B1 (hexachloroethanesmoke) shell
- T4 (M93)HVAP-T shot
The M79 AP shot could penetrate 92 mm of homogeneous armor angled at 30 degrees from the vertical at 1,000 yards. The M62 APCBC/HE-T shell was capable of penetrating 88 mm of homogeneous armor under the same conditions The T4 (later M93) HVAP shot was rare and was used in small numbers beginning in September 1944. It could penetrate 135 mm of homogeneous armor at 30 degrees and 1,000 yards. This shot featured a sub-caliber tungsten carbide penetrator encased within a steel jacket and aluminum body and ballistic "windshield". By March 1945, about 18,000 rounds of this special ammunition had been delivered to the European Theater, 58 percent of which were 3-inch projectiles.[16]The M42A1 high explosive shell was used for indirect artillery fire or against fortifications and soft targets like infantry in trenches or antitank guns. The M88 hexachloroethane smoke shell was used to create smoke screens, or to flush enemy infantry out of buildings or fortified positions.
A.50 caliber(12.7 mm)Browning M2HBheavy machine gun could be mounted on the top rear of the turret for use against enemy infantry and foranti-aircraftuse. The ammuntion (300 rounds in 50-round boxes) was stowed under the vehicle subfloor. The crew had personal weapons for self-defense. AThompson submachine gunwith 460 rounds of ammunition was stowed on brackets in the right rear of the turret for use by the vehicle commander. The other four crew members were armed withM1 carbines,each carrying as much ammunition on their person as they saw fit. AnM1903 Springfield riflewith 60 rounds of ammunition was stowed next to the assistant driver, and an adapter for the rifle and tenM9 rifle grenadesfor use against tanks were stowed under the left front vehicle subfloor. Storage boxes in the turret held fiveMk 2 grenade,fiveM18 smoke grenade,and twothermite grenades.[citation needed]
Combat use
editUnited States Army
editThe M10's heavy chassis did not conform to the quickly evolving tank destroyer doctrine of employing very light high-speed vehicles, and starting in the summer of 1944 it began to be supplemented by the fastM18 Hellcat.American tank destroyer doctrine called for tank destroyers to be kept in reserve and rushed forward to counter massed enemy armored attacks. In reality, this was not the case and M10 battalions were attached, often semi-permanently, to infantry and armored divisions to provide additional direct and indirect fire support. Typical missions included providing indirect artillery fire by augmenting divisional artillery units, following and supporting the lead elements of an infantry assault, attacking obstacles such as fortifications and enemy vehicles (including tanks) that hampered the advance of friendly units, and setting up an antitank defense once the objective was secured.
The combat debut of the M10 came on 23 March 1943, during theBattle of El Guettar,in theTunisian campaignpart of the largerNorth African campaign.The M10 was initially successful as its M7 3-inch gun could destroy most German tanks then in service. During the battle, M10s of the 899th Tank Destroyer Battalion andM3 Gun Motor Carriagesof the601st Tank Destroyer Battaliondestroyed 30 German tanks, although 20 M3s and 7 M10s were lost. The M10 did not see much anti-tank action for the rest of the North African campaign, and instead was used as mobile fire support.
During tank fighting in theNormandy campaign,the M10's 3-inch gun was proven to be ineffective against the thick frontal armor of the GermanPanthermedium tank. On 6 July 1944,Eisenhower's headquartersrequested that all M10 battalions be converted to the newM36as soon as possible.[17][18][page needed]On 10 July 1944, the899th Tank Destroyer Battalionblunted a German counterattack by thePanzer Lehr DivisionnearLe Dézertand destroyed 12 Panthers, onePanzer IV,and oneSturmgeschütz IIIassault gunin a fierce two-day battle, most of it taking place at ranges of less than 200 m (220 yd). Due to the initial shock of encountering heavy German tanks, further changes were made in the tank destroyer force in late September 1944. American officials requested that of the 52 battalions then committed to the European theater, 20 be converted to the M36, 20 retain the M10 orM18at the discretion of their commanders, and the 12 towed battalions be re-equipped with the (then-prototype) T5 90 mm towed gun.[19][20]By October 1944, the improved 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 began to arrive in Europe, and mostly replaced the M10 by the end of the war. The plans to retain any towed battalions at all were canceled after their generally poor performance and high losses in 1944, especially during theBattle of the Bulge.[citation needed]
In the Italian campaign, as in northern Europe, the M10s were normally attached to infantry or armored units as infantry support or mobile artillery, more so the latter because of the general lack of German armor in that theater. Many US divisional commanders asked for their M10s to be replaced with fully armored tanks.[citation needed]In thePacific war,due to the lack of serious Japanese tank opposition, US Army M10s were not used as tank destroyers, but as mobile artillery and infantry support. The M10 proved unpopular in the Pacific due to its open turret, which left it vulnerable to Japanese close-assault antitank tactics.[citation needed]
Month | Conversions |
---|---|
May 1944 | 98 |
June 1944 | 81 |
July 1944 | 69 |
August 1944 | 70 |
September 1944 | 112 |
October 1944 | 126 |
November 1944 | 152 |
December 1944 | 82 |
January 1945 | 86 |
February 1945 | 95 |
March 1945 | 30 |
April 1945 | 18 |
Total | 1,017 |
The United States supplied 1,648 M10s to the British Army via the Lend-Lease program.[citation needed][c]The British gave them the designation3inch Self-propelled Mount M10(3-in SPM M10). The M10 with the "wedge" counterweight was known as the "3in SPM M10 Mk I" and the M10 with the "duck bill" counterweight was the "3in SPM M10 Mk II". 1,017 of the vehicles were up-gunned with the powerful17-pounder (76.2mm) gunfrom May 1944 to April 1945.[22]Within the Department of Tank Design both the 3-inch and 17-pounder versions were known as "Achilles".[d]The 17-pounder conversions were designated with a "C" suffix added on to the "M10" designation, called "17pdr M10" or "Achilles Ic". Most of the vehicles converted were the 3in SPM M10 Mk II, as the duck bill counterweight balanced the heavy gun better. The gun mantlet needed modification to accept the barrel. Although the 17-pounder was a similar bore to the 3-inch gun M7, it had a longer barrel and used a larger propellant charge giving far superior armor penetrating capabilities. Using the APDS round, the gun performance was increased by about 50%. The 17pdr SP was used by the British, Canadian and Polish armies in Italy and northwest Europe.[23]As well as service with British forces in Northwest Europe, they were retained post-war. Those not upgunned were stripped of their turrets and used as artillery tractors.
In British service, as self-propelled anti-tank guns, the M10 was operated by regiments of theRoyal Artillery.Typically, two batteries had M10s while the other two batteries had the towed 17-pounder gun. One tactical theory was that the two towed batteries would form a gun line, while an M10 battery remained mobile on each flank to drive or lead enemy tanks to the static gun line. In practice, UK batteries were frequently separated in Normandy, M10s being seconded to Britishtank brigadesequipped withChurchill tanksarmed with thegeneral purpose 75 mm gunjust as were British 17 pounder conversions.[citation needed]
The Free French received at least 227 M10s, 155 of them through Lend-Lease.[24]They served first in Italy, then in France and Germany. During theliberation of Parisin August 1944, a single M10 of General Leclerc's2nd Armored Divisionnamed "Siroco" disabled a Panther in thePlace de la Concordefrom under theArc de Triompheon thePlace de L'Etoile,at 1,800 m. French M10s also saw action on the French-German border aroundStrasbourgand in southern Germany; the Free FrenchFirst Armyled by General De Lattre received some when they were a part of theSixth United States Army Group.French M10s were operated along similar lines as US tank destroyer units, although initially with five vehicles per platoon instead of four.[citation needed]
Approximately 52 M10s were supplied to theSoviet Unionthrough Lend-Lease. They were used to form two self-propelled artillery regiments (SPA). The first was the 1223rd Self-propelled Artillery Regiment of the29th Tank Corps,part of the5th Guards Tank Army.This unit served on the3rd Belorussian Frontin 1944, taking part in summer campaigns in Belorussia, the Baltic, and East Prussia. The 1239th Self-propelled Artillery Regiment was part of the16th Tank Corps,2nd Tank Army. It fought in Belorussia and Poland in 1944.[25]
In 1944, during theBattle of the Bulge,Operation Greifwas a plan developed by the Nazis to infiltrate behind the Allies lines. They made various modifications to make approximately ten Panther tanks look as similar as possible to the American M10, known as the "Panther M10" or the "ErsatzM10 "(Ersatzmeaning 'replacement' or 'substitute' in German).
Israel bought M10s from scrapyards and dumping grounds in Europe after 1948. They came the Idea to up-gun the M10 with the modern SA50 gun which was considered an improvement. The first batch arrived in 1951, being in very bad shape. Some years later, as the M10's guns were worn out, Israel decided to installQF 17-pounderThese were called the M50 Achillies. Israel requested the assistance of France to develop the new tank in 1953. After building the prototype, France taught Israel how to do it themselves and provided their technical knowledge related to this development along with a contract to sell the SA50 guns and ammunition. The M10s were repaired and entered service in 1955. After the1956 war,It is believed that Israel may have captured several from Egypt that received the diesel engines of captured Egyptian Sherman tanks. They were withdrawn from service by 1966.
Egypt
editThe Egyptian Army had a small number of ex-British M10s, 3-inch and 17-pdr versions, and used them in 1948 against Israel. Israel captured some of them.[citation needed]
Combat performance
editMonth | M10 strength | M10 losses |
---|---|---|
June 1944 | 691 | 1 |
July 1944 | 743 | 17 |
August 1944 | 758 | 28 |
September 1944 | 763 | 40 |
October 1944 | 486 | 71 |
November 1944 | 573 | 45 |
December 1944 | 790 | 62 |
January 1945 | 760 | 69 |
February 1945 | 686 | 106 |
March 1945 | 684 | 27 |
April 1945 | 427 | 37 |
May 1945 | 427 | 37 |
The M10's open-topped turret left the crew vulnerable to artillery and mortar fire and fragments. The 893rd Tank Destroyer Battalion took many casualties from artillery fire and tree bursts and lost 16 of 24 M10s during theBattle of the Hürtgen Forest.[29]The crew was also exposed to sniper fire and infantry close assault, such as grenades thrown through the open turret, or attacks from upper story-windows, especially inurban warfareand wooded areas.
However, the open-topped turret gave excellent visibility, which was valuable for a vehicle that was tasked with finding enemy armored vehicles and other targets. The open top also made escape easier when the vehicle was hit and improved communications with accompanying infantry.
The M10 had a very slow turret rotation speed, as the turret traverse was unpowered and the crew used a hand crank to rotate the turret. It took approximately 80 seconds to rotate a full 360 degrees.[30]
Total M10 losses in the European Theater of Operations to all causes were 539.[31]
Despite not adhering strictly to the tank destroyer doctrine, the M10 still achieved impressive scores against enemy tanks. A US Army study of 39 tank destroyer battalions found that each destroyed, on average, 34 tanks, 17 towed guns, and 16 pillboxes. The tank destroyer battalions in theThird Armyclaimed the destruction of 686 tanks and 238 self-propelled guns. The highest-scoring tank destroyer battalion in the European Theater, the 823rd Tank Destroyer Battalion, claimed to have destroyed 113 panzers, including 27 Panthers and 18 Tigers, using towed guns and M10s. The 773rd Tank Destroyer Battalion also claimed to have destroyed 113 panzers, with the 702nd Tank Destroyer Battalion claiming 103. The 601st Tank Destroyer Battalion, which fought in North Africa, Italy, and Europe, claimed to have knocked out 155 tanks and self-propelled guns.[32]Tank destroyers in the European Theater fired approximately 11high-explosive(HE) rounds for every round ofarmor-piercing(AP) ammunition, an indication of their use in general support duties in addition to the intended mission of anti-tank defense.[citation needed]
Variants
edit- 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35(Prototype):M4A2 medium tankchassis
- 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35E1(Prototype): Redesign of T35 with thinner sloped armor. Turret design changed and vehicle standardized as M10.
- 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10
- 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10A1:M4A3 medium tankchassis
- 3in SPM M10:M10 in British Army service that was equipped with the 3-inch gun M7.
- The M10 with the "wedge" counterweight was designated3in SPM M10 Mk I
- The M10 with the "duck bill" counterweight was designated3in SPM M10 Mk II
- M10Cor17pdr M10:M10 in British Army service that was equipped with a 76mmOrdnance QF 17 pounder Mark Vgun as used on some British tanks. They can be identified by the muzzle brake at the end of the barrel and a counterweight behind the muzzle brake. Post-war the name Achilles has become associated with the 17pdr; contemporary sources referred to it as a "Firefly", not to be confused with post-war use of the name for the17pdr Sherman tank.
- M35 Prime Mover:Turretless M10A1 used as anartillery tractor
- 3in SP Ram Mk I:Proposed Canadian-built version using aRam tankchassis – a single prototype was built in 1942.[33]
- M10 Self-Propelled Howitzer:Demilitarized M10s transferred to the Republic of China in 1949 and rearmed with modified ex-Imperial Japanese Army 105 mm infantry howitzers. Other modifications included a permanent turret roof with crew hatches, lighter and more impact-resistant armor, and a bow machine gun.[34]One prototype and 16 follow-on vehicles were made.
- Israeli M10s:Israeli Ordnance Corps converted tanks, using 75mm guns received from France. This gun was fitted to a number of M10s (originally Achilles tank destroyers), that were renamed asM-50 Achillestank destroyers.
Users
edit- Canada
- Denmark
- Egypt
- France
- Free France
- Israel
- Italy
- New Zealand
- Philippines
- Poland
- Republic of China
- Nazi Germany(Ersatz M10 and captured vehicles)
- South Africa
- Republic of Korea
- Soviet Union
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Netherlands
See also
editVehicles of comparable role, performance and era
edit- AmericanM36 GMC
- BritishSP 17pdr, A30 (Avenger)
- GermanHetzerandSturmgeschütz III
- JapaneseType 1 Ho-Ni IandType 3 Ho-Ni III
- ItalianSemovente da 75/34
- RomanianMareșal
- SovietSU-85
- SovietSU-100
References
editNotes
edit- ^The M5 was criticized as being too hastily designed and was rendered obsolete by the Army's request for a turreted tank destroyer. It was cancelled on 30 September 1942.
- ^The M9 was also criticized and performed very poorly during trials, breaking a track and later catching fire. It was cancelled on 28 August 1942, when it was realized that there were only 28 M1918 guns available to use for production vehicles.
- ^The British were the conduit for Lend-Lease materiel to the French and Polish forces.
- ^This fitted in the British naming system, along with theArcher,theAvenger,and theAlecto;the name was rarely used by troops during the war
Citations
edit- ^Zaloga (2002) p8
- ^"3" GMC M10 ".
- ^Zaloga (2002), author's note
- ^Bryan Perrett (2003),Impossible Victories,p 98, Barnes & Noble,ISBN978-0-7607-3533-6
- ^Chris Henry & Brian Delf (2004),British Anti-tank Artillery 1939–45,p 23, Osprey,ISBN978-1-84176-638-6.
- ^Steven J ZalogaM10 and M36 Tank Destroyers 1942-53Osprey
- ^War Department (18 July 1944)."FM18-5, Tactical Employment: Tank Destroyer Unit"(PDF).Chapter 2 p.5 – via Hyperwar Foundation.
- ^Zaloga (2002) p7
- ^Zaloga (2013) p25
- ^Zaloga (2002) p12
- ^Hunnicutt (1978) p198
- ^David Doyle (2003),Standard Catalog of US Military Vehicles,p 356
- ^Zaloga (2002) p21
- ^Doyle (2015) p13
- ^Hunnicutt (1978) p563
- ^Zaloga (2004) pp. 23–24
- ^"M10 3in Gun Motor Carriage".
- ^Zaloga (2005)
- ^Zaloga (2002) p24-33
- ^Yeide (2010) p174
- ^Zaloga (2002) p21
- ^Zaloga (2002) p21
- ^M10 Achilles IIC
- ^Zaloga (2002) p40-41
- ^Zaloga (2002) p41
- ^"The M10 Gun Motor Carriage in Israel by Life_In_Black – Status Report".ritastatusreport.live.Archived fromthe originalon 14 March 2016.
- ^"The M10 Gun Motor Carriage in Israel by Life_In_Black – Status Report".ritastatusreport.live.Archived fromthe originalon 14 March 2016.
- ^Zaloga (2002) p36
- ^Miller (2003) p90
- ^Zaloga (2002) p23
- ^Yeide (2010) p250
- ^Yeide (2010) p249
- ^AFV NewsVol. 41, No. 2 May–Aug 2006
- ^"M10 ( tự tẩu lựu đạn pháo bản )".Archived fromthe originalon 19 July 2012.Retrieved21 October2011.
Sources
edit- Doyle, David:M10 Tank Destroyer in Action.2015. Squadron/Signal Publications.ISBN9780897478007
- Hunnicutt, R.P.Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank.1978. Echo Point Books and Media, LLC.ISBN9781626548619.
- Miller, Edward G.:A Dark and Bloody Ground: The Hürtgen Forest and the Roer River Dams, 1944–1945.2003. Texas A&M University Press. 978-1585442584
- Yeide, Harry:The Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force.2010. Casemate Publishing.ISBN9781932033809
- Zaloga, Steven J.:M10 and M36 Tank Destroyers 1942–53(New Vanguard 57). 2002. Osprey Publishing.ISBN9781841764696
- Zaloga, Steven J.:M10 Tank Destroyer vs StuG III Assault Gun: Germany 1944(Duel 53). 2013. Osprey Publishing.ISBN9781780960999
- Zaloga, Steven J.:M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943-97(New Vanguard 97). 2004. Osprey Publishing.ISBN9781841766874
- Zaloga, Steven J.:US Tank and Tank Destroyer Battalions in the ETO 1944-45(Battle Orders 10). 2005. Osprey Publishing.ISBN9781841767987
- US Army Field Manuals
- FM 18-5 Tactical Employment, Tank Destroyer Unit
- FM 18-5B Organization and Tactics of Tank Destroyer Units
- FM 18-15 Tank Destroyer Drill and Crew Drill: 3-Inch Gun Motor Carriage M10, 76-mm Gun Motor Carriage T70, 3-Inch Towed Gun (Gun M5 and Carriage M1)
- FM 18-20 Tactical Employment of Tank Destroyer Platoon Self-Propelled
- US Army Technical Manuals
- TM 9-2800 Standard Military Motor Vehicles
- TM 9-323 – M7 Gun.
- TM 9-731G – Carriage, Motor, 3-inch, M10A1
- TM 9-752A – Carriage, Motor, 3-inch, M10
- TM 9-1750 – Power train unit (3-piece differential case)
- TM 9-1750B – Power train unit (1-piece differential case)
- TM 9-1750G – General Motors twin diesel
- US Army Supply Catalogue "Standard Nomenclature List"
- SNL G130 – for Carriage, Motor, 3-inch, M10
- SNL C-43 – M7 gun.
- Glue, W A; Pringle, D J C (1957),20th Battalion and Armoured Regiment,The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939-1945
External links
edit- 3 "Gun Motor Carriage M10 – AFV Database
- M10 3 "Gun Motor Carriage – World War II Vehicles
- (in French)M35 Prime Mover – 2iemeguerre.com
- I Am A Tank Destroyer Commanderlarge detailed 1943 article
- Tankdestroyer.net (Web based United States tank destroyer forces information resource)
- Flames Of War: Tanks DestroyersAn analysis of the capacities of tanks Destroyers for a wargame
- M10 Wolverine (1942)Tank & AFV Encyclopedia