Wikipedia

New Atheism

The termNew Atheismdescribes the positions of someatheistacademics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 20th and 21st centuries.[1][2]New Atheism advocates the view thatsuperstition,religion,andirrationalismshould not be tolerated. Instead, they advocate theantitheistview that the various forms oftheismshould becriticised,countered,examined, and challenged byrationalargument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics.[3][4]Critics have characterised New Atheism as "secularfundamentalism"or"fundamentalist atheism".[5][6][7][8][9]Major figures of New Atheism includeRichard Dawkins,Sam Harris,Christopher Hitchens,andDaniel Dennett,collectively referred to as the "Four Horsemen"of the movement.

History

edit

The secular humanistPaul Kurtz(1925–2012), founder of theCenter for Inquiry,is often regarded as a forerunner to the New Atheism movement.[10][11]The 2004 publication ofThe End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of ReasonbySam Harris,a bestseller in the United States, was joined over the next couple years by a series of popular best-sellers by atheist authors.[12][13]Harris was motivated by the events of11 September 2001,for which he blamed Islam, while also directly criticizingChristianityandJudaism.[14]Two years later, Harris followed up withLetter to a Christian Nation,which was a severe criticism of Christianity.[15]Also in 2006, following his television documentary seriesThe Root of All Evil?Richard DawkinspublishedThe God Delusion,which was on theNew York Timesbest-seller list for 51 weeks.[16]

In 2010,Tom Flynn(1955–2021), then editor ofFree Inquiry,stated that the only thing new about "New Atheism" was the wider publication of atheist material by big-name publishers, books that appeared on bestseller lists and were read by millions.[17]Mitchell Landsberg,covering a gathering held by theCouncil for Secular Humanismin 2010, said that religiousskepticsin attendance were at odds between "new atheists" who preferred to "encourage open confrontation with the devout" and "accommodationists" who preferred "a subtler, more tactical approach."[18]Kurtz was ousted from the Center for Inquiry in the late 2000's.[18][11]This was in part due to a perception that Kurtz was "on the mellower end of the spectrum" according to Flynn.[18]

In November 2015,The New Republicpublished an article entitled "Is the New Atheism dead?"[19]In 2016, the atheist and evolutionary biologistDavid Sloan Wilsonwrote: "The world appears to be tiring of the New Atheism movement."[20]In 2017,PZ Myers,who formerly considered himself a new atheist, publicly renounced the New Atheism movement.[21]The bookThe Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolutionwas released in 2019.[22][13]

Legacy

edit

In a January 2019 retrospective article,Steven PooleofThe Guardianobserved: "For some, New Atheism was never about God at all, but just a topical subgenre of the rightwing backlash against the supposedly suffocating atmosphere of 'political correctness'. "[23]In November 2019,Scott Alexanderargued that New Atheism did not disappear as a political movement but instead turned to social justice as a new cause to fight for.[24]

In an April 2021 interview, Natalie Wynn, aleft-wingYouTuber who runs the channelContraPoints,commented: "Thealt-right,themanosphere,incels,even the so-calledSJWInternet andLeftTubeall have a genetic ancestor in New Atheism. "[25]In a June 2021 retrospective article,Émile P. TorresofSalonargued that prominent figures in the New Atheist movement had aligned themselves with thefar-right.[26]

In a June 2022 retrospective article, Sebastian Milbank ofThe Criticstated that, as a movement, "New Atheism has fractured and lost its original spirit", that "much of what New Atheism embodied has now migrated rightwards", and that "another portion has moved leftwards, embodied by the 'I Fucking Love Science' woke nerd of today."[27]Following the conversion of writerAyaan Hirsi Alito Christianity in 2023, the columnist Sarah Jones wrote inNew Yorkmagazine that the New Atheism movement was in "terminal decline".[28]

Prominent figures

edit

Key figures associated with New Atheism includeRichard Dawkins,Sam Harris,Christopher Hitchens,Daniel Dennett,andAyaan Hirsi Ali.[29][30]

"Four Horsemen"

edit
The "Four Horsemen of the New Atheism" (clockwise from top left):Richard Dawkins(b. 1941),Christopher Hitchens(1949–2011),Daniel Dennett(1942–2024), andSam Harris(b. 1967).

On 30 September 2007, Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens, and Dennett met at Hitchens' residence in Washington, D.C., for a private two-hour unmoderatedround tablediscussion. The event was videotaped and titled "The Four Horsemen".[31]During "The God Debate" in 2010 with Hitchens versusDinesh D'Souza,the group was collectively referred to as the "Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse",[32]an allusion to the biblicalFour Horsemen of the Apocalypsefrom theBook of Revelation.[33]The four have been described by critics as "evangelical atheists".[34]

Dawkins, the author ofThe God Delusion,[35]and director of aChannel 4television documentary titledThe Root of All Evil?,is the founder of theRichard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science.He wrote: "I don't object to the horseman label, by the way. I'm less keen on 'new atheist': it isn't clear to me how we differ from old atheists."[36]

Harris wrote several bestselling non-fiction books includingThe End of Faith,Letter to a Christian Nation,The Moral Landscape,andWaking Up,along with two shorter works (initially published as e-books)Free WillandLying.[37][38]

Hitchens, the author ofGod Is Not Great,[39]was named among the "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" byForeign PolicyandProspectmagazines. He served on the advisory board of theSecular Coalition for America.In 2010, Hitchens published his memoirHitch-22(a nickname provided by close personal friendSalman Rushdie,whom Hitchens always supported during and followingThe Satanic Versescontroversy).[40]Shortly after its publication, he was diagnosed with esophageal cancer, which led to his death in December 2011.[41]Before his death, Hitchens published a collection of essays and articles in his bookArguably;[42]a short edition,Mortality,[43]was published posthumously in 2012. These publications and numerous public appearances provided Hitchens with a platform to remain an astute atheist during his illness, even speaking specifically on the culture ofdeathbed conversionsand condemningattempts to converttheterminally ill,which he opposed as "bad taste".[44][45]

Dennett was the author ofDarwin's Dangerous IdeaandBreaking the Spell.[46][47]He had been a vocal supporter ofThe Clergy Project,[48]an organization that provides support for clergy in the US who no longer believe in God and cannot fully participate in their communities any longer.[49]He was also a member of theSecular Coalition for Americaadvisory board,[50]and a member of theCommittee for Skeptical Inquiry,as well as an outspoken supporter of theBrights movement.He did research into clerics who are secretly atheists and how they rationalize their works. He found what he called a "don't ask, don't tell" conspiracy because believers did not want to hear of loss of faith. This made unbelieving preachers feel isolated, but they did not want to lose their jobs and church-supplied lodgings. Generally, they consoled themselves with the belief that they were doing good in their pastoral roles by providing comfort and required ritual.[51]The research, with Linda LaScola, was further extended to include other denominations and non-Christian clerics.[52]The research and stories Dennett and LaScola accumulated during this project were published in their 2013 co-authored book,Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Belief Behind.[53]

"Plus one horse-woman"

edit
Main article:Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Ayaan Hirsi Ali(born 1969)

Ayaan Hirsi Ali was a central figure of New Atheism[29]until she announced herconversion to Christianityin November 2023.[54]Hirsi Ali, originally scheduled to attend the 2007 meeting,[55]later appeared with Dawkins, Dennett, and Harris at the 2012Global Atheist Convention,where she was referred to as the "plus one horse-woman" by Dawkins.[56]Robyn Blumner,CEO of the Center for Inquiry, described Hirsi Ali as the "Fifth" horseman.[30]

Hirsi Ali was born inMogadishu,Somalia,fleeing in 1992 to theNetherlandsin order to escape anarranged marriage.[57]She became involved in Dutch politics, rejected faith, and became vocal in opposing Islamic ideology, especially concerning women, as exemplified by her booksInfidelandThe Caged Virgin.[58]

Hirsi Ali was later involved in the production of the filmSubmission,for which her friendTheo van Goghwas murdered with a death threat to Hirsi Ali pinned to his chest.[59]This event resulted in Hirsi Ali's hiding and later emigrating to the United States, where she resides and remains a prolific critic of Islam.[60]She regularly speaks out against the treatment of women in Islamic doctrine and society[61]and is a proponent of free speech and the freedom to offend.[62][63]

Writing in a column in November 2023, Ali announced her conversion to the Christian faith, saying the Judeo-Christian tradition is the only answer to the problems of the modern world.[64][65]

Others

edit

Others have either self-identified as or been classified by some commentators as new atheists:

Some writers sometimes classified as new atheists by others have explicitly distanced themselves from the label:

Perspective

edit
The scarlet A, symbol ofOut Campaign

Many contemporary atheists write from a scientific perspective. Unlike previous writers, many of whom thought that science was indifferent or even incapable of dealing with the "God"concept, Dawkins argues to the contrary, claiming the" God Hypothesis "is a validscientific hypothesis,[80]having effects in the physical universe, and like any other hypothesis can be tested andfalsified.Victor Stengerproposed that the personalAbrahamic Godis a scientific hypothesis that can be tested by standard methods of science. Both Dawkins and Stenger conclude that the hypothesis fails any such tests,[81]and argue thatnaturalismis sufficient to explain everything we observe. They argue that nowhere is it necessary to introduce God or thesupernaturalto understand reality.

Scientific testing of religion

edit

Non-believers (in religion and the supernatural) assert that many religious or supernatural claims (such as thevirgin birth of Jesusand theafterlife) are scientific claims in nature. For instance, they argue, as dodeistsandProgressive Christians,that the issue of Jesus' supposed parentage is a question of scientific inquiry, rather than "values" or "morals".[82]Rational thinkers believe science is capable of investigating at least some, if not all, supernatural claims.[83]Institutions such as theMayo ClinicandDuke Universityhave conductedempiricalstudies to try to identify whether there isevidence for the healing power of intercessory prayer.[84]According to Stenger, the experiments found no evidence that intercessoryprayerworked.[85]

Logical arguments

edit

In his bookGod: The Failed Hypothesis,Victor Stengerargues that a God havingomniscient,omnibenevolent,andomnipotentattributes, which he termed a3O God,cannotlogicallyexist.[86]A similar series of alleged logical disproofs of the existence of a God with various attributes can be found inMichael Martinand Ricki Monnier'sThe Impossibility of God,[87]orTheodore Drange's article, "Incompatible-Properties Arguments: A Survey".[88]

Views on non-overlapping magisteria

edit

Richard Dawkins has been particularly critical of the conciliatory view that science and religion are not in conflict, noting, for example, that the Abrahamic religions constantly dabble in scientific matters.[82]In a 1998 article published inFree Inquirymagazine,[82]and later in his 2006 bookThe God Delusion,Dawkins expresses disagreement with the view advocated byStephen Jay Gouldthat science and religion are twonon-overlapping magisteria(NOMA), each existing in a "domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse and resolution".[82]

In Gould's proposal, science and religion should be confined to distinct non-overlapping domains: science would be limited to the empirical realm, including theories developed to describe observations, while religion would deal with questions of ultimate meaning andmoral value.Dawkins contends that NOMA does not describe empirical facts about the intersection of science and religion. He argued: "It is completely unrealistic to claim, as Gould and many others do, that religion keeps itself away from science's turf, restricting itself to morals and values. A universe with a supernatural presence would be a fundamentally and qualitatively different kind of universe from one without. The difference is, inescapably, a scientific difference. Religions make existence claims, and this means scientific claims."[82]

Science and morality

edit
Main article:Science of morality

Harris considers that thewell-beingof conscious creatures forms the basis of morality. InThe Moral Landscape,he argues that science can in principle answer moral questions and help maximize well-being.[89]Harris also criticizesculturalandmoral relativism,arguing that it prevents people from making objective moral judgments about practices that clearly harm human well-being, such asfemale genital mutilation.Harris contends that we can make scientifically-based claims about the negative impacts of such practices on human welfare, and that withholding judgment in these cases is tantamount to claiming complete ignorance about what contributes to human well-being.[90]

Politics

edit

In the context of international politics, the principles of New Atheism establish no particular stance in and of themselves.[91]P. Z. Myersstated that New Atheism's key proponents are "a madly disorganized mob, united only by [their] dislike of the god-thing".[92]That said, the demographic that supports New Atheism is a markedly homogeneous one; in America and the Anglo-sphere more generally, this cohort is "more likely to be younger, male and single, to have higher than average levels of income and education, to be lessauthoritarian,lessdogmatic,less prejudiced, lessconformistand more tolerant and open-minded on religious issues. "[91]Because of this homogeneity among the group, there exists not a formal dynamic but a loose consensus on broad political "efforts, objectives, and strategies".[93]

For example, one of the primary aims is to further reduce the entanglement of church and state, which derives from the "belief that religion is antithetical to liberal values, such as freedom of expression and the separation of public from private life".[93][94][95]Additionally, new atheists have engaged in the campaign "to ensure legal and civic equality for atheists", in a world considerably unwelcoming to and distrustful of non-religious believers.[94][95][96]Hitchens may be the atheist concerned most with religion's incompatibility with contemporary liberal principles, and particularly its imposed limitation on both freedom of speech and freedom of expression.[94][97]Because New Atheism's proliferation is accredited partly to the 11 September attacks and the ubiquitous, visceral response,Richard Dawkins,among many in his cohort, believes thattheism(in this case,Islam) jeopardizes political institutions andnational security,and he warns of religion's potency in motivating "people to do terrible things" against internationalpolities.[98]

Criticisms

edit
See also:Criticism of atheism § New Atheism

According toNature,"Critics of new atheism, as well as many new atheists themselves, contend that in philosophical terms it differs little from earlier historical forms of atheist thought."[99]

Scientism, accusations of evangelicalism and fundamentalism

edit

Critics of the movement described it asmilitant atheismandfundamentalist atheism.[a][100][101][102][11]Theologians Jeffrey Robbins and Christopher Rodkey take issue with what they regard as "theevangelicalnature of the New Atheism, which assumes that it has a Good News to share, at all cost, for the ultimate future of humanity by the conversion of as many people as possible ", and believe they have found similarities between New Atheism and evangelical Christianity and conclude that the all-consuming nature of both" encourages endless conflict without progress "between both extremities.[103]Political philosopherJohn Grayasserts that New Atheism,humanism,andscientismare extensions of religion, particularly Christianity.[104]Sociologist William Stahl said, "What is striking about the current debate is the frequency with which the New Atheists are portrayed as mirror images of religiousfundamentalists."[105]

The atheist philosopher of scienceMichael Rusestates that Richard Dawkins would fail "introductory" courses on the study of "philosophyorreligion"(such as courses on thephilosophy of religion), courses which are offered, for example, at many educational institutions such as colleges and universities around the world.[106][107]Ruse also says that the movement of New Atheism—which is perceived by him to be "a bloody disaster" —makes him ashamed, as a professional philosopher of science, to be among those holding to an atheist position, particularly as New Atheism, as he sees it, does science a "grave disservice" and does a "disservice to scholarship" at a more general level.[106][107]Paul Kurtz,editor in chief ofFree Inquiry,founder ofPrometheus Books,was critical of many of the new atheists.[102]He said, "I consider them atheist fundamentalists... They're anti-religious, and they're mean-spirited, unfortunately. Now, there are very good atheists and very dedicated people who do not believe in God. But you have this aggressive and militant phase of atheism, and that does more damage than good."[11]Jonathan Sacks,author ofThe Great Partnership: Science, Religion, and the Search for Meaning,feels the new atheists miss the target by believing the "cure for bad religion is no religion, as opposed to good religion". He wrote:

Atheism deserves better than the new atheists whose methodology consists of criticizing religion without understanding it, quoting texts without contexts, taking exceptions as the rule, confusing folk belief with reflective theology, abusing, mocking, ridiculing, caricaturing, and demonizing religious faith and holding it responsible for the great crimes against humanity. Religion has done harm; I acknowledge that. But the cure for bad religion is good religion, not no religion, just as the cure for bad science is good science, not the abandonment of science.[108]

The philosopherMassimo Pigliuccicontends that the new atheist movement overlaps with scientism, which he finds to be philosophically unsound. He writes: "What I do object to is the tendency, found among many New Atheists, to expand the definition of science to pretty much encompassing anything that deals with 'facts', loosely conceived... it seems clear to me that most of the New Atheists (except for the professional philosophers among them) pontificate about philosophy very likely without having read a single professional paper in that field... I would actually go so far as to charge many of the leaders of the New Atheism movement (and, by implication, a good number of their followers) with anti-intellectualism, one mark of which is a lack of respect for the proper significance, value, and methods of another field of intellectual endeavor."[109]

InThe Evolution of Atheism,Stephen LeDrew wrote that New Atheism is fundamentalist and scientist; in contrast to atheism's tradition ofsocial justice,it isright-wingand serves to defend "the position of the white middle-class western male".[110][111][112]Atheist professorJacques Berlinerblauhas criticised the new atheists' mocking of religion as being inimical to their goals and claims that they have not achieved anything politically.[113]Roger Scrutonhas extensively criticized New Atheism on various occasions, generally on the grounds that they do not consider the social effects and impacts of religion in enough detail. He has said, "Look at the facts in the round and it seems likely that humans without a sense of the sacred would have died out long ago. For that same reason, the hope of the new atheists for a world without religion is probably as vain as the hope for a society without aggression or a world without death."[114]He has also complained of the new atheists' idea that they must "set people free from religion", calling it "naive" because they "never consider that they might be taking something away from people".[115]

Criticisms of responses to theistic arguments

edit

Edward Feserhas critiqued the new atheists' responses to arguments for the existence of God:[116]

It can safely be said that if you haven't both understoodAquinasand answered him – not to mentionAnselm,Duns Scotus,Leibniz,Samuel Clarke,and so on, but let that pass – then you have hardly "made your case" against religion. Yet Dawkins is the only "New Atheist" to offer anything even remotely like an attempt to answer him, feeble as it is.

— Edward Feser,The Last Superstition(2008)

Criticism from David Bentley Hart

edit

Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable EnemiesbyDavid Bentley Hartwas published byYalein 2009. PhilosopherAnthony Kennycalled Hart's book "the most able counsel for the defence in recent years".[117]Writing forCommonweal,poet Michael Robbins described the book as "an unanswerable and frequently hilarious demolition of the shoddy thinking and historical illiteracy of the so-called New Atheists."[118]On 27 May 2011, Hart's book was awarded the Michael Ramsey Prize in Theology by the Archbishop of Canterbury,Rowan Williams.[119][120]Hart argues positively that Christianity was a progressive factor in human history and the only factor that "can be called in the fullest sense" a revolution. In his negative case against New Atheism, Hart argues that the Enlightenment was actually "a reactionary flight back toward a comfortable, but dehumanizing, mental and moral servitude to elemental nature."[121]

Accusations of bigotry

edit
See also:Elevatorgate

The New Atheist movement has been accused of sexism, especially prominent figures such asRichard Dawkins.[122][123]In 2014, Sam Harris said that New Atheism was "to some degree intrinsically male".[123]Sebastian MilbankofThe Criticstated thatanti-Catholicrhetoric by the New Atheist movement reached its pinnacle in 2010, during thestate visit by Pope Benedict XVI to the United Kingdom,where "many mainstream newspapers (especiallyThe Guardian) engaged in more or less naked anti-Catholic rhetoric of a sort that seemed more suited to the eighteenth century than the twenty-first ".[27]

Some commentators have accused the New Atheist movement ofIslamophobia.[124][125][126][127]Wade Jacoby and Hakan Yavuz assert that "a group of 'new atheists' such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens" have "invoked Samuel Huntington's 'clash of civilizations' theory to explain the current political contestation" and that this forms part of a trend toward "Islamophobia... in the study of Muslim societies ".[126]William W. Emilson argues that "the 'new' in the new atheists' writings is not their aggressiveness, nor their extraordinary popularity, nor even their scientific approach to religion, rather it is their attack not only on militant Islamism but also on Islam itself under the cloak of its general critique of religion."[127]

See also

edit

References

edit

Informational notes

  1. ^The term is sometimes used benignly, for example by atheists such as Frans de Waal.[100]

Citations

  1. ^Lee, Lois; Bullivant, Stephen (17 November 2016).A Dictionary of Atheism.Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-252013-5.Archivedfrom the original on 20 January 2023.Retrieved12 March2017.
  2. ^Wolf, Gary (1 November 2006)."The Church of the Non-Believers".Wired.ISSN1059-1028.Archivedfrom the original on 21 July 2017.Retrieved19 January2023.
  3. ^Taylor, James E."New Atheists".The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Archivedfrom the original on 26 August 2016.Retrieved14 April2016.The New Atheists are authors of early twenty-first century books promoting atheism. These authors includeSam Harris,Richard Dawkins,Daniel Dennett,andChristopher Hitchens.The 'New Atheist' label for these critics of religion and religious belief emerged out of journalistic commentary on the contents and impacts of their books.
  4. ^Hooper, Simon (9 November 2006)."The rise of the New Atheists".CNN.Archivedfrom the original on 8 April 2010.Retrieved16 March2010.
  5. ^Hedges, Chris (2008).When Atheism Becomes Religion: America's New Fundamentalists.Free Press.ISBN978-1-4165-7078-3.
  6. ^McAnulla, Stuart (2011)."Secular fundamentalists? Characterising the new atheist approach to secularism, religion and politics".British Politics.9(2). Palgrave Macmillan: 124–145.doi:10.1057/bp.2013.27.
  7. ^LeDrew, Stephen (2018)."Scientism and Utopia: New Atheism as a Fundamentalist Reaction to Relativism".Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society.Springer. pp. 143–155.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_9.ISBN978-3-319-96558-1.
  8. ^Stahl, William (2010)."One-Dimensional Rage: The Social Epistemology Of The New Atheism And Fundamentalism".Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal.Brill. pp. 95–108.ISBN978-90-04-19053-5.
  9. ^Nall, Jeff (2008)."Fundamentalist Atheism and its Intellectual Failures".Humanity & Society.32(3). Sage: 263–280.doi:10.1177/016059760803200304.
  10. ^Evans, Robert (22 October 2012)."Paul Kurtz," giant "of humanism, dead at 86".Reuters.Archivedfrom the original on 28 December 2022.Retrieved25 December2022.
  11. ^abcdHagerty, Barbara Bradley (19 October 2009)."A Bitter Rift Divides Atheists".NPR.Archivedfrom the original on 1 April 2019.Retrieved12 February2017.
  12. ^Hitchens, Christopher(15 August 2007)."God Bless Me, It's a Best-Seller!".Vanity Fair.Archivedfrom the original on 2 October 2016.Retrieved14 April2016....in the last two years there have been five atheist best-sellers, one each from Professors Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett and two from the neuroscientist Sam Harris.
  13. ^abHitchens, Christopher (2019).The Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolution.New York: Random House. p. 1.ISBN978-0-525-51195-3.Archivedfrom the original on 21 April 2023.Retrieved20 January2023.
  14. ^Harris, Sam(11 August 2004).The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason.W. W. Norton & Company.ISBN978-0-7432-6809-7.
  15. ^Steinfels, Peter(3 March 2007)."Books on Atheism Are Raising Hackles in Unlikely Places".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 26 June 2017.Retrieved17 July2016.
  16. ^"The God DelusionOne-Year Countdown ".RichardDawkins.net.Archived fromthe originalon 28 August 2008.Retrieved5 October2007.
  17. ^Flynn, Tom(2010)."Why I Don't Believe in the New Atheism".Free Inquiry.30(3): 7–43.Archivedfrom the original on 7 April 2020.Retrieved28 July2011.
  18. ^abcLandsberg, Mitchell (10 October 2010)."Religious skeptics disagree on how aggressively to challenge the devout".Los Angeles Times.Archivedfrom the original on 21 January 2023.Retrieved21 January2023.
  19. ^Bruenig, Elizabeth (6 November 2015)."Is the New Atheism dead?".The New Republic.Archivedfrom the original on 12 July 2018.Retrieved27 August2022.
  20. ^Sloan Wilson, David (1 February 2016)."The New Atheism as a Stealth Religion: Five Years Later".This View Of Life.Archivedfrom the original on 16 August 2017.Retrieved20 January2023.
  21. ^Myers, PZ (31 July 2017)."The New Atheism is dead. Long live atheism".Pharyngula.Archivedfrom the original on 11 September 2018.Retrieved12 July2018.
  22. ^"The Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolution".Publishers Weekly.19 March 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 21 August 2019.Retrieved21 August2019.
  23. ^Poole, Steven (31 January 2019)."The Four Horsemen review - whatever happened to 'New Atheism'?".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 28 July 2022.Retrieved21 July2022.
  24. ^West, Ed (4 November 2019)."What really happened to the New Atheists".UnHerd.Archivedfrom the original on 21 July 2022.Retrieved21 July2022.
  25. ^Maughan, Philip (14 April 2021)."The World According to ContraPoints".Highsnobiety.Archivedfrom the original on 29 April 2022.Retrieved3 August2021.
  26. ^Torres, Émile P. (5 June 2021)."Godless grifters: How the New Atheists merged with the far right".Salon.Archivedfrom the original on 26 August 2022.Retrieved27 August2022.
  27. ^abMilbank, Sebastian (15 June 2022)."The strange afterlife of New Atheism".The Critic.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2022.Retrieved16 June2022.
  28. ^Jones, Sarah (29 November 2023)."The Infidel Turned Christian".Intelligencer.Archivedfrom the original on 18 January 2024.Retrieved5 December2023.
  29. ^abKhalil, Mohammad Hassan, ed. (2017),"The New Atheism",Jihad, Radicalism, and the New Atheism,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–96,doi:10.1017/9781108377263.009,ISBN978-1-108-38512-1,archivedfrom the original on 3 October 2023,retrieved24 December2022
  30. ^abBlumner, Robyn(4 December 2020)."Give the Four Horsemen (and Ayaan) Their Due. They Changed America".Free Inquiry.Archivedfrom the original on 28 December 2022.Retrieved24 December2022.
  31. ^"The Four Horsemen DVD".Richard Dawkins Foundation.Archived fromthe originalon 11 June 2017.Retrieved13 April2016.On the 30th of September 2007, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens sat down for a first-of-its-kind, unmoderated 2-hour discussion, convened by RDFRS and filmed by Josh Timonen.
  32. ^Hoffman, Claire (2 September 2014)."Sam Harris is Still Railing Against Religion".Los Angeles Magazine.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2017.Retrieved13 April2016.As Western society grappled with radical Islam, Harris distinguished himself with his argument that modern religious tolerance had placated us into allowing delusion rather than reason to prevail. Harris upended a discussion that had long been dominated by cultural relativism and a hands-off academic intellectualism; his seething contempt for the world's faiths helped launch the 'New Atheist' movement, and together with Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett, he became known as one of the 'Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse.'
  33. ^Zenk, Thomas (2013). "16. New Atheism". In Bullivant, Stephen; Ruse, Michael (eds.).The Oxford Handbook of Atheism.OUP Oxford. p. 254.ISBN978-0-19-964465-0.Archivedfrom the original on 3 October 2023.Retrieved20 January2023.
  34. ^Stedman, Chris (18 October 2010)."'Evangelical Atheists': Pushing For What? ".The Huffington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 4 August 2016.Retrieved2 March2017.something peculiarly evangelistic about what has been termed the new atheist movement... It is no exaggeration to describe the movement popularized by the likes of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens as a new and particularly zealous form of fundamentalism — an atheist fundamentalism.
  35. ^Dawkins, Richard (2007).The God Delusion.Black Swan.ISBN978-0-552-77429-1.
  36. ^Richard Dawkins,The God Delusion,10th anniversary edition, Black Swan, 2016, page I15 (new introduction for the 10th anniversary edition).
  37. ^Harris, Sam(2012).Free Will.The Free Press. p.96.ISBN978-1451683400.ASIN1451683405.
  38. ^Harris, Sam (2013).Lying.Four Elephants Press. p. 108.ISBN978-1940051000.ASIN1940051002.
  39. ^Hitchens, Christopher(2007).God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything(First trade ed.). Atlantic Books. p. 320.ISBN978-1-843-54574-3.
  40. ^Hitchens, Christopher (2010).Hitch22.Atlantic Books. p. 448.ISBN978-1-843-54922-2.ASIN1843549220.
  41. ^"Christopher Hitchens dies at 62 after suffering cancer".BBC News.16 December 2011.Archivedfrom the original on 30 March 2019.Retrieved20 June2018.
  42. ^Hitchens, Christopher (2011).Arguably.Atlantic Books.ISBN978-0857892584.ASIN0857892584.
  43. ^Hitchens, Christopher (2012).Mortality.Atlantic Books.ISBN978-1848879218.ASIN1848879210.
  44. ^Hitchens, Christopher."Is there an afterlife?".YouTube.[dead YouTube link]
  45. ^Hitchens, Christopher (12 December 2010)."Hitchens and Paxman interview".YouTube.Archivedfrom the original on 20 December 2021.
  46. ^Dennett, Daniel(1996).Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Penguin Adult. p. 592.ISBN978-0140167344.ASIN014016734X.
  47. ^Dennett, Daniel(2007).Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon.Penguin. p. 464.ISBN978-0141017778.
  48. ^Dennett, Daniel."Clergy Project".Archived fromthe originalon 22 January 2013.
  49. ^"Clergy Project Home Page".4 October 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 9 June 2017.Retrieved3 November2013.
  50. ^"Daniel Dennett".secular.org.Archived fromthe originalon 5 December 2020.Retrieved4 January2021.
  51. ^[1]ArchivedJanuary 23, 2019, at theWayback Machine,"Preachers Who Are Not Believers,"Evolutionary Psychology,Vol. 8, Issue 1, March 2010, pp. 122–50,ISSN1474-7049.
  52. ^Podcast: interview with Daniel Dennett. Further developments of the research: pastors, priests, and an Imam who are closet atheists.ArchivedApril 14, 2020, at theWayback Machine.
  53. ^"Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Belief Behind".TheHumanist.com.22 April 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 1 April 2019.Retrieved1 June2017.
  54. ^Ali, Ayaan Hirsi (11 November 2023)."Why I am now a Christian".UnHerd.Archivedfrom the original on 23 January 2024.Retrieved13 November2023.
  55. ^Ahuja, Anjana (22 March 2019)."The Four Horsemen — polemics from the high priests of New Atheism".Financial Times.Archivedfrom the original on 28 December 2022.Retrieved24 December2022.
  56. ^Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris & Ayaan Hirsi AlionYouTube
  57. ^"Ayaan Hirsi Ali".Archived fromthe originalon 7 March 2015.Retrieved3 November2013.
  58. ^Hirsi Ali, Ayaan(2008).The Caged Virgin.Free Press.ISBN978-0743288347.ASIN0743288343.
  59. ^"Controversial film maker killed".The Independent.London. 2 November 2004. Archived fromthe originalon 24 June 2011.
  60. ^Hirsi Ali, Ayaan (6 February 2012)."Christians in the Muslim world".Newsweek.Archivedfrom the original on 4 March 2016.Retrieved3 November2013.
  61. ^Hirsi Ali, Ayaan (15 May 2012)."Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Protecting Women From Militant Islam".Smithsonian.com.Archived fromthe originalon 25 June 2012.
  62. ^Hirsi Ali, Ayaan (12 May 2009)."The Right to Offend".Project Reason.Archived fromthe originalon 6 December 2010.
  63. ^Hirsi Ali, Ayaan (17 September 2012)."Muslim Rage and the Last Gasp of Islamic Hate".Newsweek.Archivedfrom the original on 23 April 2016.Retrieved3 November2013.
  64. ^Jones, Sarah (29 November 2023)."The Infidel Turned Christian".Intelligencer.Archivedfrom the original on 18 January 2024.Retrieved5 December2023.
  65. ^Ali, Ayaan Hirsi (11 November 2023)."Why I am now a Christian".UnHerd.
  66. ^Wainwright, Jon (2010)."The Not So New Atheists?".Philosophy Now.Archivedfrom the original on 30 June 2022.Retrieved27 August2022.
  67. ^Schulson, Michael (2 November 2013)."Atheist Philosopher Peter Boghossian's Guide to Converting Believers".The Daily Beast.Archivedfrom the original on 16 December 2020.Retrieved19 November2020.
  68. ^Borninski, Ned (30 June 2015)."In Defense of New Atheism".Center for Inquiry.Archivedfrom the original on 19 May 2023.Retrieved26 August2022.
  69. ^Berezow, Alex (21 October 2013)."Jerry Coyne's Twisted History of Science and Religion".Forbes.Archivedfrom the original on 25 November 2022.Retrieved25 November2022.
  70. ^abcPigliucci, Massimo (2013).New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism MovementArchived20 August 2020 at theWayback MachineMidwest Studies In Philosophy,Vol. 37 (1): pp. 142-153.
  71. ^Kehe, Marjorie (10 February 2011)."Interview with Rebecca Newberger Goldstein, author of" 36 Arguments for the Existence of God ".The Christian Science Monitor.Archivedfrom the original on 7 December 2022.Retrieved27 August2022.
  72. ^Dalrymple, Theodore (2007)."What the New Atheists Don't See".City Journal.Archived fromthe originalon 10 July 2022.Retrieved27 August2022.
  73. ^"...sagte Michael Schmidt-Salomon, Vorstand der Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung und damit so etwas wie Deutschlands Chef-Atheist." ( "...said Michael Schmidt-Salomon, [who is] chairman of the Giordano Bruno Foundation, and therefore something of a 'chief atheist' for Germany." )Chef-Atheist im Chat: "Gynäkologen, die an die Jungfrauengeburt glauben",Spiegel Online,29 May 2007 (Accessed 6 April 2008)
  74. ^Rogan, Joe (15 March 2017)."Joe Rogan and T.J. Kirk on Milo Yiannopoulos".The Joe Rogan Experience.Retrieved17 March2017– via YouTube.
  75. ^"New Atheists".Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Archivedfrom the original on 21 December 2019.Retrieved20 January2023.
  76. ^Stenger, Victor J. (4 December 2009).The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason.Prometheus Books.ISBN978-1-61592-344-1.Archivedfrom the original on 21 April 2023.Retrieved20 January2023.
  77. ^Johnstone-Louis, Mary (2013). "No Gods. No Masters?: The 'New Atheist' Movement and the Commercialization of Unbelief". In Rinallo, Diego; Scott, Linda M.; Maclaran, Pauline (eds.).Consumption and Spirituality.New York: Routledge. p. 57.ISBN978-0-415-88911-7.
  78. ^Catto, Rebecca; Eccles, Jane (14 April 2011)."Beyond Grayling, Dawkins and Hitchens, a new kind of British atheism".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 31 December 2011.Retrieved27 August2022.
  79. ^"@loftusjohnw on Twitter: Why Did Randal Rauser Recommend" God and Horrendous Suffering "? Despite his high recommendation of my book Rauser is on a mission to discredit it, pejoratively calling me a" New Atheist "and a" Fundamentalist ". Inquiring Minds Want to Know Why!".Archivedfrom the original on 8 April 2022.Retrieved8 April2022.
  80. ^Dawkins, Richard (2008).The God Delusion.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  81. ^Stenger, 2008
  82. ^abcdeDawkins, Richard (1998)."When Religion Steps on Science's Turf: The Alleged Separation Between the Two Is Not So Tidy".Free Inquiry.Vol. 18, no. 2 Spring.Archivedfrom the original on 16 March 2012.Retrieved1 April2023.
  83. ^Fishman, Yonatan I. (June 2009)."Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?"(PDF).Science & Education.18(6–7): 813–837.Bibcode:2009Sc&Ed..18..813F.doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4.S2CID20246250.Archived fromthe originalon 5 June 2011.
  84. ^Stenger, Victor J.(12 February 2006)."Darwin Day Celebration: An International Celebration of Science and Humanity −"Supernatural Science"".Mukto-Mona.Archived fromthe originalon 14 March 2016.Retrieved11 March2010.
  85. ^Stenger, Victor J. (2009).The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason.Amherst, New York:Prometheus Books. p. 70.ISBN978-1-59102-751-5.
  86. ^Stenger, Victor J. (2007).God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist(with new foreword by Christopher Hitchens ed.). Amherst (New York): Prometheus Books.ISBN978-1591026525.
  87. ^Martin, Michael;Monnier, Ricki (2003).The Impossibility of God.Prometheus Books.
  88. ^Theodore M. Drange (1998)."Incompatible-Properties Arguments: A Survey".Philo(2): 49–60. Archived fromthe originalon 6 December 2022 – via The Secular Web.
  89. ^Harris, Sam (2012).The Moral Landscape.Black Swan.ISBN978-0552776387.ASIN0552776386.
  90. ^Harris, Sam."How Science can Determine Moral Values".Archivedfrom the original on 27 February 2014.Retrieved2 November2013.
  91. ^abKettell, Steven (21 November 2013)."Faithless: The politics of new atheism".Secularism and Nonreligion.2:61.doi:10.5334/snr.al.
  92. ^Meyers [sic], Paul Z. [Pharyngula](11 June 2011)."Atheism ≠ fascism".ScienceBlogs.Archivedfrom the original on 1 April 2023.Retrieved1 April2023.
  93. ^ab"New Atheism: The Politics of Unbelief".E-International Relations.18 June 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 23 June 2020.Retrieved21 June2020.
  94. ^abcSchulzke, Marcus (December 2013). "The Politics of New Atheism".Politics and Religion.6(4): 778–799.doi:10.1017/S1755048313000217.S2CID197670821.ProQuest2210982282.
  95. ^abKettell, Steven (December 2016)."What's really new about New Atheism?".Palgrave Communications.2(1): 16099.doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.99.
  96. ^Edgell, Penny; Gerteis, Joseph; Hartmann, Douglas (April 2006). "Atheists As 'Other': Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society".American Sociological Review.71(2): 211–234.doi:10.1177/000312240607100203.S2CID143818177.
  97. ^Hitchens, Christopher (December 2011)."Why Even Hate Speech Needs to Be Protected".Reader's Digest.Archivedfrom the original on 23 June 2020.Retrieved21 June2020.
  98. ^"Richard Dawkins On Terrorism And Religion".NPR.org.27 May 2017.Archivedfrom the original on 22 June 2020.Retrieved20 June2020.
  99. ^Kettell, Steven (December 2016)."What's really new about New Atheism?".Palgrave Communications.2(1).doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.99.
  100. ^abDe Waal, Frans(25 March 2013)."Has militant atheism become a religion?".Salon.com.Archivedfrom the original on 9 June 2017.Retrieved9 March2017.Why are the 'neo-atheists' of today so obsessed with God's nonexistence that they go on media rampages, wear T-shirts proclaiming their absence of belief, or call for a militant atheism? What does atheism have to offer that's worth fighting for? As onephilosopherput it, being a militant atheist is like 'sleeping furiously.'
  101. ^Bullivant, Stephen; Lee, Lois (2016). "Militant atheism".Oxford Reference.1.doi:10.1093/acref/9780191816819.001.0001.
  102. ^abKurtz, Paul(February 2007)."Religion in Conflict: Are 'Evangelical Atheists' Too Outspoken?".Free Inquiry.Archivedfrom the original on 20 January 2023.Retrieved20 January2023.
  103. ^Jeffrey Robbins; Christopher Rodkey (2010). "Beating 'God' to Death: Radical Theology and the New Atheism". In Amarnath Amarasingam (ed.).Religion and the New Atheism A Critical Appraisal.Haymarket Books. p. 35.ISBN978-1-60846-203-2.
  104. ^Gray, John (2019).Seven types of atheism.Picador.ISBN978-1-250-23478-0.OCLC1137728757.
  105. ^William Stahl (2010). "One-Dimensional Rage: The Social Epistemology of the New Atheism and Fundamentalism". In Amarnath Amarasingam (ed.).Religion and the New Atheism A Critical Appraisal.Haymarket Books. pp. 97–108.ISBN978-1-60846-203-2.
  106. ^abDougherty, T; Gage, LP (2015). "4/ New Atheist Approaches to Religion". In Oppy, Graham (ed.).The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion.Abingdon, UK; New York: Routledge. pp. 51–62.ISBN978-1-84465-831-2.pp. 52–53:Michael Ruse (2009) said that Dawkins would fail 'any philosophy or religion course'; and for this reason Ruse saysThe God Delusionmade him 'ashamed to be an atheist'
  107. ^abRuse, Michael (August 2009)."Why I Think the New Atheists are a Bloody Disaster".Beliefnet.The BioLogos Foundation as a columnist of Beliefnet.Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2014.Retrieved19 August2015.... I believe the new atheists do the side of science a grave disservice... these people do a disservice to scholarship... Richard Dawkins inThe God Delusionwould fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing... the poor quality of the argumentation in Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens, and all of the others in that group... "[...]" the new atheists are doing terrible political damage to the cause of Creationism fighting. Americans are religious people... They want to be science-friendly, although it is certainly true that many have been seduced by the Creationists. We evolutionists have got to speak to these people. We have got to show them that Darwinism is their friend not their enemy. We have got to get them onside when it comes to science in the classroom. And criticizing good men like Francis Collins, accusing them of fanaticism, is just not going to do the job. Nor is criticizing everyone, like me, who wants to build a bridge to believers – not accepting the beliefs, but willing to respect someone who does have them. "[...]"The God Delusionmakes me ashamed to be an atheist.... They are a bloody disaster and I want to be on the front line of those who say so.
  108. ^Sacks, Jonathan (2011).The Great Partnership: Science, Religion, and the Search for Meaning.New York: Schocken. p. 11.ISBN978-0-805-24301-7.
  109. ^Pigliucci, Massimo (2013).New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement.Midwest Studies in Philosophy. pp. 151–152.
  110. ^"The Evolution of Atheism(Review) ".Publishers Weekly.19 October 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 9 April 2022.Retrieved9 April2022.
  111. ^Sullivan, Marek (2016)."Review ofThe Evolution of Atheism".Secularism and Nonreligion.5(1): 5.doi:10.5334/snr.73.
  112. ^Flynn, Tom (2016)."The Evolution of Atheism(Review) ".Free Inquiry.36(3).Archivedfrom the original on 10 August 2020.Retrieved10 April2022.
  113. ^Winston, Kimberly (17 September 2012)."Professor Jacques Berlinerblau tells atheists: Stop whining!".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 12 January 2018.Retrieved31 October2017.
  114. ^Scruton, Roger (31 May 2014)."Humans hunger for the sacred. Why can't the new atheists understand that?".The Spectator.Archivedfrom the original on 8 May 2024.Retrieved30 January2022.
  115. ^"Roger Scruton on New Atheism and Religion".Archivedfrom the original on 20 December 2021 – via www.youtube.com.
  116. ^Feser, Edward; Bowman, Karlyn (26 March 2010)."The New Philistinism".American Enterprise Institute - AEI.Archivedfrom the original on 1 April 2023.Retrieved1 April2023.
  117. ^"Anthony Kenny on 'Atheist Delusions'".The Times Literary SupplementandTruthdig.14 May 2010. Archived fromthe originalon 9 November 2020.Retrieved23 January2023.
  118. ^"He Is Who Is".Commonweal.27 January 2014. Archived fromthe originalon 26 December 2022.Retrieved23 January2023.
  119. ^"Winner of £10,000 Theology Prize Announced".The Archbishop of Canterbury.May 2011. Archived fromthe originalon 4 July 2012.Retrieved4 November2013.
  120. ^"David B. Hart wins the 2011 Michael Ramsay prize".The Christian Century.27 May 2011.Archivedfrom the original on 18 January 2012.Retrieved22 January2023.
  121. ^Hart, David Bentley(2009). "Introduction".Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.ISBN9780300164299.
  122. ^Winston, Kimberly (6 September 2018)."Leading atheist, accused of sexual misconduct, speaks out".Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 6 September 2018.Retrieved13 July2022.
  123. ^abBianco, Marcie (12 February 2016)."Brazen sexism is pushing women out of America's atheism movement".Quartz.Archivedfrom the original on 9 July 2022.Retrieved21 July2022.
  124. ^Taylor, Jerome (13 April 2013)."Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash".The Independent.Archivedfrom the original on 18 June 2022.Retrieved30 January2022.
  125. ^FP Staff"Unholy war: Atheists and the politics of Muslim-baitingArchived8 June 2017 at theWayback Machine".First Post.Retrieved April 16, 2013.
  126. ^abJacoby, Wade; Yavuz, Hakan (April 2008). "Modernization, Identity and Integration: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Islam in Europe".Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.28(1): 1.doi:10.1080/13602000802080486.S2CID144021468.
  127. ^abEmilsen, William (August 2012). "The New Atheism and Islam".The Expository Times.123(11): 521–528.doi:10.1177/0014524612448737.S2CID171036043.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Atheism&oldid=1259230535"