Nucleophilic substitution

Inchemistry,anucleophilic substitution(SN) is a class ofchemical reactionsin which anelectron-richchemical species(known as anucleophile) replaces afunctional groupwithin another electron-deficient molecule (known as theelectrophile). The molecule that contains the electrophile and the leaving functional group is called thesubstrate.[1][2]

The most general form of the reaction may be given as the following:

The electron pair (:) from the nucleophile (Nuc)attacksthe substrate (R−LG) and bonds with it. Simultaneously, the leaving group (LG) departs with an electron pair. The principal product in this case isR−Nuc.The nucleophile may be electrically neutral or negatively charged, whereas the substrate is typically neutral or positively charged.

An example of nucleophilic substitution is thehydrolysisof analkylbromide,R-Br under basic conditions, where the attacking nucleophile ishydroxyl(OH) and theleaving groupisbromide(Br).

Nucleophilic substitution reactions are common inorganic chemistry.Nucleophiles often attack asaturatedaliphaticcarbon. Less often, they may attack anaromaticor unsaturated carbon.[3]

Saturated carbon centres

edit

SN1 and SN2 reactions

edit
A graph showing the relative reactivities of the different alkyl halides towards SN1 and SN2 reactions (also see Table 1).

In 1935,Edward D. HughesandSir Christopher Ingoldstudied nucleophilic substitution reactions ofalkyl halidesand related compounds. They proposed that there were two main mechanisms at work, both of them competing with each other. The two main mechanisms were theSN1 reactionand theSN2 reaction,whereSstands for substitution,Nstands for nucleophilic, and the number represents thekinetic orderof the reaction.[4]

In the SN2 reaction, the addition of the nucleophile and the elimination of leaving group take place simultaneously (i.e. aconcerted reaction). SN2 occurs when the central carbon atom is easily accessible to the nucleophile.[5]

Nucleophilic substitution at carbon
SN2 mechanism

In SN2 reactions, there are a few conditions that affect the rate of the reaction. First of all, the 2 in SN2 implies that there are two concentrations of substances that affect the rate of reaction: substrate (Sub) and nucleophile. The rate equation for this reaction would be Rate=k[Sub][Nuc]. For a SN2 reaction, anaprotic solventis best, such as acetone, DMF, or DMSO. Aprotic solvents do not add protons (H+ions) into solution; if protons were present in SN2 reactions, they would react with the nucleophile and severely limit the reaction rate. Since this reaction occurs in one step,steric effectsdrive the reaction speed. In the intermediate step, the nucleophile is 185 degrees from the leaving group and the stereochemistry is inverted as the nucleophile bonds to make the product. Also, because the intermediate is partially bonded to the nucleophile and leaving group, there is no time for the substrate to rearrange itself: the nucleophile will bond to the same carbon that the leaving group was attached to. A final factor that affects reaction rate is nucleophilicity; the nucleophile must attack an atom other than a hydrogen.

By contrast the SN1 reaction involves two steps. SN1 reactions tend to be important when the central carbon atom of the substrate is surrounded by bulky groups, both because such groups interfere sterically with the SN2 reaction (discussed above) and because a highly substituted carbon forms a stablecarbocation.

Nucleophilic substitution at carbon
SN1 mechanism

Like SN2 reactions, there are quite a few factors that affect the reaction rate of SN1 reactions. Instead of having two concentrations that affect the reaction rate, there is only one, substrate. The rate equation for this would be Rate=k[Sub]. Since the rate of a reaction is only determined by its slowest step, the rate at which the leaving group "leaves" determines the speed of the reaction. This means that the better the leaving group, the faster the reaction rate. A general rule for what makes a good leaving group is the weaker the conjugate base, the better the leaving group. In this case, halogens are going to be the best leaving groups, while compounds such as amines, hydrogen, and alkanes are going to be quite poor leaving groups. As SN2 reactions were affected by sterics, SN1 reactions are determined by bulky groups attached to the carbocation. Since there is an intermediate that actually contains a positive charge, bulky groups attached are going to help stabilize the charge on the carbocation through resonance and distribution of charge. In this case, tertiary carbocation will react faster than a secondary which will react much faster than a primary. It is also due to this carbocation intermediate that the product does not have to have inversion. The nucleophile can attack from the top or the bottom and therefore create a racemic product. It is important to use a protic solvent, water and alcohols, since an aprotic solvent could attack the intermediate and cause unwanted product. It does not matter if the hydrogens from the protic solvent react with the nucleophile since the nucleophile is not involved in the rate determining step.

Table 1. Nucleophilic substitutions on RX (an alkyl halide or equivalent)
Factor SN1 SN2 Comments
Kinetics Rate = k[RX] Rate = k[RX][Nuc]
Primary alkyl Never unless additional stabilising groups present Good unless a hindered nucleophile is used
Secondary alkyl Moderate Moderate
Tertiary alkyl Excellent Never Eliminationlikely if heated or if strong base used
Leaving group Important Important For halogens,
I > Br > Cl >> F
Nucleophilicity Unimportant Important
Preferredsolvent Polarprotic Polaraprotic
Stereochemistry Racemisation(+ partialinversionpossible) Inversion
Rearrangements Common Rare Side reaction
Eliminations Common, especially with basic nucleophiles Only with heat & basic nucleophiles Side reaction
esp. if heated

Reactions

edit

There are many reactions in organic chemistry involving this type of mechanism. Common examples include:

R−XR−HusingLiAlH4(SN2)
R−Br + OHR−OH+Br(SN2) or
R−Br + H2O → R−OH +HBr(SN1)
R−Br +OR'R−OR'+ Br(SN2)

Borderline mechanism

edit

An example of a substitution reaction taking place by a so-calledborderline mechanismas originally studied by Hughes and Ingold[6]is the reaction of1-phenylethyl chloridewithsodium methoxidein methanol.

Thereaction rateis found to the sum of SN1 and SN2 components with 61% (3,5 M, 70 °C) taking place by the latter.

Other mechanisms

edit

Besides SN1 and SN2, other mechanisms are known, although they are less common. TheSNimechanism is observed in reactions ofthionyl chloridewithalcohols,and it is similar to SN1 except that the nucleophile is delivered from the same side as the leaving group.

Nucleophilic substitutions can be accompanied by anallylic rearrangementas seen in reactions such as theFerrier rearrangement.This type of mechanism is called an SN1' or SN2' reaction (depending on the kinetics). Withallylichalides or sulphonates, for example, the nucleophile may attack at the γ unsaturated carbon in place of the carbon bearing the leaving group. This may be seen in the reaction of 1-chloro-2-butene withsodium hydroxideto give a mixture of 2-buten-1-ol and 1-buten-3-ol:

TheSn1CB mechanismappears ininorganic chemistry.Competing mechanisms exist.[7][8]

Inorganometallic chemistrythenucleophilic abstractionreaction occurs with a nucleophilic substitution mechanism.

Unsaturated carbon centres

edit

Nucleophilic substitution via the SN1 or SN2 mechanism does not generally occur with vinyl or aryl halides or related compounds. Under certain conditions nucleophilic substitutions may occur, via other mechanisms such as those described in thenucleophilic aromatic substitutionarticle.

Substitution can occur at thecarbonylgroup, such asacyl chloridesandesters.

References

edit
  1. ^March, J. (1992).Advanced Organic Chemistry(4th ed.). New York: Wiley.ISBN9780471601807.
  2. ^R. A. Rossi, R. H. de Rossi,Aromatic Substitution by the SRN1 Mechanism, ACS Monograph Series No. 178, American Chemical Society, 1983.ISBN0-8412-0648-1.
  3. ^L. G. Wade,Organic Chemistry,5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2003.
  4. ^S. R. Hartshorn,Aliphatic Nucleophilic Substitution,Cambridge University Press, London, 1973.ISBN0-521-09801-7
  5. ^Introducing Aliphatic Substitution with a Discovery Experiment Using Competing ElectrophilesTimothy P. Curran, Amelia J. Mostovoy, Margaret E. Curran, and Clara Berger Journal of Chemical Education 2016 93 (4), 757-761doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00394
  6. ^253. Reaction kinetics and the Walden inversion. Part II. Homogeneous hydrolysis, alcoholysis, and ammonolysis of -phenylethyl halidesEdward D. Hughes, Christopher K. Ingold and Alan D. Scott,J. Chem. Soc.,1937,1201doi:10.1039/JR9370001201
  7. ^N.S.Imyanitov.Electrophilic Bimolecular Substitution as an Alternative to Nucleophilic Monomolecular Substitution in Inorganic and Organic Chemistry.J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.)1990;60 (3); 417-419.
  8. ^Unimolecular Nucleophilic Substitution does not Exist! / N.S.Imyanitov.SciTecLibrary
edit