Tetanurae

(Redirected fromOrionides)
This is thelatest accepted revision,reviewedon3 November 2024.

Tetanurae(/ˌtɛtəˈnjuːriː/ or "stiff tails" ) is a clade that includes mosttheropoddinosaurs,includingmegalosauroids,allosauroids,andcoelurosaurs(which includestyrannosauroids,ornithomimosaurs,compsognathidsandmaniraptorans,the latter including livingbirds).[1]Tetanurans are defined as all theropods more closely related to modern birds than toCeratosaurusand contain the majority of predatory dinosaur diversity.[2]Tetanurae likely diverged from its sister group,Ceratosauria,during the late Triassic.[3]Tetanurae first appeared in the fossil record by the Early Jurassic about 190 mya and by the Middle Jurassic had become globally distributed.[2]

Tetanurans
Temporal range:
Early JurassicPresent,201–0Ma
Six tetanurans (top left to bottom right):Monolophosaurusin combat with non-tetanuran dinosaurTuojiangosaurus,Allosaurus,Deinocheirus,Spinosaurus,Sciurumimus,and anemu
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Clade: Neotheropoda
Clade: Averostra
Clade: Tetanurae
Gauthier,1986
Subgroups
Synonyms
  • Avetheropoda?Paul, 1988
  • AvipodaNovas, 1992
  • Neotetanurae?Sereno, 1999
  • Orionides?Carranoet al., 2012

The group was named by Jacques Gauthier in 1986 and originally had two main subgroups: Carnosauria and Coelurosauria, the clade containing birds and related dinosaurs such as compsognathids, tyrannosaurids, ornithomimosaurs, and maniraptorans.[4]The original Carnosauria was a polyphyletic group including any large carnivorous theropod.[5]Many of Gauthier's carnosaurs, such as tyrannosaurids, have since been re-classified as coelurosaurs or primitive tetanurans.[2]Carnosauria has been reclassified as a group containing allosaurids that split from the Coelurosauria at the Neotetanurae/Avetheropoda node.[2]Members of Megalosauroidea are believed to represent basal tetanurans, but recent discoveries have shown that they might be members of Carnosauria expanding Carnosauria back to its original meaning.[2]It is however agreed that Megalosauroids, Allosauroids and Coelurosaurians are all members of the Orionides, a subset within Tetanurae that contains dinosaurs more derived than animals such as Chuandongcoelurus and Kayentavenator.

Tetanuran evolution was characterized by parallel diversification of multiple lineages, repeatedly attaining large body size and similar locomotor morphology.[2]Cryolophosaurushas been claimed as the first true member of the group, but subsequent studies have disagreed on whether it is a dilophosaurid or tetanuran.[2][6]Arcucci and Coria (2003) classifiedZupaysaurusas an early tetanuran,[7]but it was later placed as a sister taxon to the clade containing dilophosaurids, ceratosaurs, and tetanurans.[8]

Shared tetanuran features include a ribcage indicating a sophisticated air-sac-ventilated lung system similar to that in modern birds.[5][9]This character would have been accompanied by an advanced circulatory system.[5][9]Other tetanuran characterizing features include the absence of the fourth digit of the hand, placement of the maxillary teeth anterior to the orbit, a strap-like scapula, maxillary fenestrae, and stiffened tails.[3][5][9]During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, large spinosaurids and allosaurs flourished but possibly died out in the northern hemisphere before the end of the Cretaceous, and were replaced as apex predators by tyrannosauroid coelurosaurs.[10]At least in South America, carcharodontosaurid allosaurs may have persisted until the end of the Mesozoic Era, and died out at the same time as the non-avian coelurosaurs.[11][12]

Morphology

edit
Illustration ofMonolophosaurus jiangi

Anatomy

edit

Tetanurans have two basic skull morphologies.[2]The first skull type, typical in large theropods such asAllosaurus,is common within ceratosaurs and may be primitive for tetanurans. In this type, the skull is about three times longer than tall, with a blunter snout and frequent elaborations such as horns or spikes along the lacrimals, nasals, and frontals.[2]In the second skull type, the skull is lower and longer, with a less elaborated skull roof and a more elongated snout.[2]Shared tetanuran features include the maxillary fenestra (an opening in the antorbital fossa), a pneumatic excavation in the jugal, and the position of the maxillary teeth anterior to the orbit.[3]The posterior skull is little modified in tetanurans, except within Spinosauridae. The presence of anantorbitaltooth row in tetanurans may be associated with macropredatory habits.[4]

In the postcranial skeleton, tetanurans transition between the most primitive theropod morphologies in basal tetanurans towards more derived, bird-like states in coelurosaurs.[2]Most tetanurans possess specialized wrist bones, the absence or reduction of the fourth digit of the hand, a strap-like scapula, stiffened tails, and a laminar astragalar ascending process.[3][5][9]Advanced tetanurans would have possessed a sophisticated air-sac-ventilated lung system similar to birds, and an advanced circulatory system.[5][9]In megalosaurids and allosaurids, the orientation of the femoral head is anteromedial such as in ceratosaurs, but in avetheropods this orientation is fully medial.[2]Tetanuran locomotor morphology is relatively generalized, with few variations between taxa.[2]

The hands of tetanurans, unlike those of the closely related ceratosaurs, lack a fourth finger. Early tetanurans still possessed metacarpal IV, but it was vestigial and not part of a finger anymore. The tridactyl manus was preserved in birds. Evidence from the basal ceratosaurSaltriovenatorindicates the tetanuran digits are I, II and III instead of II, III and IV.[13]

Body Size

edit

Basal tetanurans were the first theropods to achieve truly giant body sizes, with both megalosauroid and allosauroid taxa weighing over 1 ton.[2]Sequential temporal appearances of large body size in subsequent clades suggest a pattern of size-cycles, with the extinction of incumbent giant forms allowing for replacement with a new, more bird-like theropod group that then also evolved giant body size.[2]It is, however, possible that more than one giant tetanuran existed at a time in the same paleoenvironment, perhaps with feeding habit variations. Within most dinosaur clades, body size tended to increase over time along a lineage according toCope's rule.[14]Coelurosaurian theropods are the notable exception to the pattern of body size increases.[2]

History of study

edit

History of classification

edit

Tetanurae was recognized and named by Gauthier in 1986.[15]The earliest-discovered non-avian tetanuran isMegalosaurus.[2]For a century after the description ofMegalosaurus,most large carnivorous dinosaurs were serially arrayed into the family Megalosauridae within the order Theropoda.[2]In 1914, Friedrich von Huene separated small, lightly built forms into the infraorder Coelurosauria and larger taxa into the infraorder Pachypodosauria.[2]Later, he transferred large, carnivorous taxa to the new infraorder Carnosauria, which came to include all known large-bodied carnivores other thanCeratosaurus.[2]The size-based arrangement persisted until Gauthier, who redefined Carnosauria and Coelurosauria based on new cladistic analyses but retained the terms.[15]Gauthier defined Coelurosauria as a taxon comprising birds and theropods closer to birds than to Carnosauria, and listed within Carnosauria several large-bodied theropod taxa but did not formally define the group.[15]Many of these original carnosaurs have since been reclassified as coelurosaurs or primitive tetanurans, and Carnosauria has now been defined asAllosaurusand all Avetheropods closer toAllosaurusthan to birds.[16]

Initial cladistics studies supported the arrangement of primitive megalosaurs as serial outgroups to a clade of allosaurids, followed by the Coelurosauria. Subsequent studies have discovered that many of these basal tetanurans formed a true clade, termed Megalosauroidea or alternatively Spinosauroidea.[2]

Current phylogeny

edit

Current phylogeny agrees on a monophyletic Tetanurae that includes a series of generally large-bodied basal taxa outside a monophyletic Coelurosauria.[2]Coelophysoids are basal to Tetanurae, with Ceratosauria forming a sister taxa that diverged during the late Triassic.[3]

After their initial appearance, Tetanurae radiated into two main clades, Spinosauroidea or Megalosauroidea and Avetheropoda or Neotetanurae.[16]Spinosauroidea are believed to represent basal Tetanurans. At the Neotetanurae/Avetheropoda node, allosaurids split from the Coelurosauria. Tyrannosauridae has been placed within Coelurosauria. The allosaurids and their closest relatives form a reconstituted Carnosauria.[2]Debate persists about whether the allosaurids form a clade with spinosauroids/megalosauroids, and whether Allosauroidea belongs in Avetheropoda with Coelurosauria or forms a sister taxa to Megalosauroidea, and whether Megalosauroidea forms a valid clade.[2]

Although manyphylogeneticanalyses found basal tetanurans that were outside bothMegalosauroideaand Avetheropoda, the coredichotomywas named only in 2012. Carrano, Benson and Sampson (2012) named that cladeOrionides,and defined it as thenodecomprisingMegalosauroidea,Avetheropoda, their most recent common ancestor, and all its descendants.[17]In 2015, Hendrickx, Hartman and Mateus clarified this definition, specifying it as the least inclusive clade includingAllosaurus fragilis,Megalosaurus bucklandii,andPasser domesticus.[18]

The clade name "Orionides" was first established by Matthew T. Carrano, Roger B. J. Benson and Scott D. Sampson in2012.It is derived fromOrion,the giant hunter ofGreek mythologyin references to the large size and carnivorism ofbasalorionidans. The name also refers to the alternative name for theconstellation of Orion,Alektropodion, meaning "rooster foot".[17]

The smaller clade,Avetheropodawas named byGregory S. Paulin 1988,[19]and was first defined as acladeby Currie and Padian in 1997, to includeAllosaurus,modernbirds,and other animals descended from their most recent ancestor. In 1999,Paul Serenonamed another group,Neotetanurae,for the clade containingAllosauroideaandCoelurosauria,and excluding other tetanurans such asmegalosauroids,[20]but this definition was published slightly later. A monophyletic Avetheropoda is recovered in many papers; however, recent findings suggest a monophyletic Carnosauria model with allosauroids and megalosauroids as each other's closest relatives instead of Allosauroids and Coelurosaurs.[21]

Thecladogrampresented below follows a phylogenetic analysis published by Zanno and Makovicky in 2013.[10]

Tetanurae

In 2019, Rauhut and Pol describedAsfaltovenator vialidadi,a basal allosauroid displaying a mosaic of primitive and derived features seen within Tetanurae. Their phylogenetic analysis found traditionalMegalosauroideato represent a basalgradeof carnosaurs,paraphyleticwith respect to Allosauroidea.[22]

Paleobiology

edit

Biogeography

edit

The biogeographical history of non-avian Tetanurae spans over 110 million years and all continents.[2]The presence of major lineages prior to the breakup of Pangaea implies wide dispersal of these clades, with later absences indicating regional extinctions or dispersal failure.[2]The density of sampling is currently insufficient to provide a detailed analysis of biogeographical evolution for the Tetanurae.[2]

Diversity

edit

Tetanurae and Ceratosauria likely diverged during the late Triassic, more than 200 mya. By the Early Jurassic, Tetanurae fossils appear in the fossil record and reached global distribution by the Middle Jurassic.[2]In the Late Jurassic, the fossil record demonstrates widespread presence of multiple clades within both megalosauroids and avetheropods.[2]The Megalosauroidea contained high diversity with two Jurassic clades, Piatnitzkysauridae and Megalosauridae, as well as the Cretaceous Spinosauridae.[2]Tetanuran evolution appears to exhibit waves of diversification, although this may be due to uneven sampling.[2]During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, large spinosaurids and allosaurids flourished, but the latter possibly died out before the end of the Cretaceous due to theCenomanian-Turonian boundary event,while spinosaurids are known from the Santonian. Soon afterwards the niche of terrestrial apex predator was filled by ceratosaurs and tyrannosaurids, which dominated terminal Cretaceous terrestrial ecosystems.[10]Coelurosaurs persisted through the end of the Mesozoic Era.[10]Modern birds are the only living representatives of the Tetanurae.[10]

References

edit
  1. ^"Tetanurae".www.ucmp.berkeley.edu.Retrieved2016-06-03.
  2. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeCarrano, Matthew T.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Sampson, Scott D. (2012-06-01). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)".Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.10(2): 211–300.doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927.ISSN1477-2019.S2CID85354215.
  3. ^abcdeSereno P.C., Wilson J.A., Larsson, H.C.E., Dutheil D.B., & H. Sues. (1994). "Early Cretaceous Dinosaurs from the Sahara".Science.266(5183): 267–71.Bibcode:1994Sci...266..267S.doi:10.1126/science.266.5183.267.PMID17771449.S2CID36090994.{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ab"Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds".Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences.8.1986-01-01.ISSN0885-4629.
  5. ^abcdef"Palaeos Vertebrates Theropoda: Basal Tetanurae".palaeos.com.Retrieved2016-06-03.
  6. ^Smith N. D.; Hammer W.R. & P.J. Currie (2005). "Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Cryolophosaurus ellioti (Dinosauria: Theropoda): Implications for basal theropod evolution".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.25(3): 1–143.doi:10.1080/02724634.2005.10009942.S2CID220413556.
  7. ^Arcucci, Andrea B.; Coria, Rodolfo A. (2013-04-19)."A new Triassic carnivorous dinosaur from Argentina".Ameghiniana.40(2).ISSN1851-8044.Archived fromthe originalon 2020-08-08.Retrieved2016-06-03.
  8. ^Hans-Dieter Sues, Sterling J. Nesbitt, David S. Berman and Amy C. Henrici (2011)."A late-surviving basal theropod dinosaur from the latest Triassic of North America".Proceedings of the Royal Society B.278(1723): 3459–3464.doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0410.PMC3177637.PMID21490016.{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^abcdeWeishampel D.B., Dodson P. & H. Osmólska (2004-12-06).The Dinosauria.University of California Press.ISBN9780520941434.
  10. ^abcdeZanno, Lindsay E.; Makovicky, Peter J. (2013-11-22)."Neovenatorid theropods are apex predators in the Late Cretaceous of North America".Nature Communications.4:2827.Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2827Z.doi:10.1038/ncomms3827.PMID24264527.
  11. ^Candeiro, Carlos Roberto A.; Currie, Philip J.; Candeiro, Caio L.; Bergqvist, Lílian P. (2017-01-16)."Tooth wear and microwear of theropods from the Late Maastrichtian Marília Formation (Bauru Group), Minas Gerais State, Brazil".Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.106(4): 229–233.doi:10.1017/s175569101600013x.ISSN1755-6910.
  12. ^Fernandes de Azevedo, Rodrigo P.; Simbras, Felipe Medeiros; Furtado, Miguel Rodrigues; Candeiro, Carlos Roberto A.; Bergqvist, Lílian Paglarelli (March 2013). "First Brazilian carcharodontosaurid and other new theropod dinosaur fossils from the Campanian–Maastrichtian Presidente Prudente Formation, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil".Cretaceous Research.40:131–142.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2012.06.004.ISSN0195-6671.
  13. ^Sasso, Cristiano Dal; Maganuco, Simone; Cau, Andrea (2018-12-19)."The oldest ceratosaurian (Dinosauria: Theropoda), from the Lower Jurassic of Italy, sheds light on the evolution of the three-fingered hand of birds".PeerJ.6:e5976.doi:10.7717/peerj.5976.ISSN2167-8359.PMC6304160.PMID30588396.
  14. ^Hone, D. W. E.; Keesey, T. M.; Pisani, D.; Purvis, A. (2005-05-01)."Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope's rule".Journal of Evolutionary Biology.18(3): 587–595.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00870.x.ISSN1010-061X.PMID15842488.
  15. ^abcGauthier, J. A. (1986-01-01)."Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds".Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences.8.ISSN0885-4629.
  16. ^abCurrie P.J. & K. Padian (1997).Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs.Academic Press.ISBN9780080494746.
  17. ^abCarrano, M. T.; Benson, R. B. J.; Sampson, S. D. (2012). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)".Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.10(2): 211–300.doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927.
  18. ^Hendrickx, C.; Hartman, S.A.; Mateus, O. (2015). "An overview of non-avian theropod discoveries and classification".PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology.12(1): 1–73.
  19. ^Paul, G. S. (1988).Predatory Dinosaurs of the World.New York: Simon & Schuster.ISBN0-671-61946-2.
  20. ^Sereno, P. C. (1999). "The evolution of dinosaurs".Science.284(5423): 2137–2147.doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2137.PMID10381873.
  21. ^Rauhut (2019-12-11).""Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs"".Scientific Reports.9(1): 18826.Bibcode:2019NatSR...918826R.doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7.PMC6906444.PMID31827108.
  22. ^Rauhut, Oliver W. M.; Pol, Diego (2019-12-11)."Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs".Scientific Reports.9(1): 18826.Bibcode:2019NatSR...918826R.doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7.ISSN2045-2322.PMC6906444.PMID31827108.