Homonym (biology)

(Redirected fromSenior homonym)

Inbiology,ahomonymis a name for ataxonthat is identical in spelling to another such name, that belongs to a differenttaxon.

The rule in theInternational Code of Zoological Nomenclatureis that the first such name to be published is thesenior homonymand is to be used (it is "valid"); any others arejunior homonymsand must be replaced with new names. It is, however, possible that if a senior homonym is archaic, and not in "prevailing usage," it may be declared anomen oblitumand rendered unavailable, while the junior homonym is preserved as anomen protectum.

For example:

Similarly, theInternational Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants(ICN) specifies that the first published of two or more homonyms is to be used: alater homonymis "illegitimate"and is not to be used unlessconserved(or sanctioned, in the case of fungi).[1]

Example: the later homonymMyroxylonL.f. (1782), in the familyLeguminosae,is conserved against the earlier homonymMyroxylonJ.R.Forst. & G.Forst. (1775) (now calledXylosma,in the familySalicaceae).

Limits and exceptions

edit

Under the zoological code, homonymy can only occurwithineach of the three nomenclatural ranks (family-rank, genus-rank, and species-rank) but notbetweenthem; there are thousands of cases where a species epithet is identical to a genus name but not a homonym (sometimes even occurring in the genus it is identical to, such asGorilla gorilla,termed a "tautonym"), and there are some rare cases where a family-rank name and a genus-rank name are identical (e.g., the superfamily nameRanoideaand the genus nameRanoideaare not homonyms). The botanical code is generally similar, but prohibits tautonyms.

Parahomonyms

edit

Under the botanical code, names that are similar enough that they are likely to be confused are also considered to be homonymous (article 53.3). For example,AstrostemmaBenth. (1880) is an illegitimate homonym ofAsterostemmaDecne. (1838). The zoological code considers even a single letter difference to be sufficient to render family-rank and genus-rank names distinct (Article 56.2), though for species names, the ICZN specifies a number of spelling variations (Article 58) that are considered to be identical.

Hemihomonyms

edit

Both codes only consider taxa that are in their respective scope (animals for the ICZN; primarily plants for the ICN). Therefore, if an animal taxon has the same name as a plant taxon, both names are valid. Such names are calledhemihomonyms.[2]

For example, the nameEricahas been given to both a genus of spiders,EricaPeckham & Peckham, 1892, and to a genus of heaths,EricaL.

Another example isCyanea,applied to the lion's mane jellyfishCyaneaPéron and Lesueur and to the Hawaiian lobelioidCyaneaGaudich.

Hemihomonyms are possible at the species level as well, with organisms in different kingdoms sharing the samebinomial nomenclature.For instance,Orestias elegansdenotes both a species of fish (kingdomAnimalia) and a species of orchid (kingdomPlantae). Such duplication of binomials occurs in at least nine instances.

Animal Plant
Adesmia muricata(Linnaeus, 1758)(a beetle) Adesmia muricata(Jacq.) DC.(a legume)
Agathis montanaShestakov, 1932(a wasp) Agathis montanade Laub.(the Mount Panié kauri, a conifer)
Baileya australis(Grote, 1881)(the small baileya moth) Baileya australisRydb.syn.B. multiradiata(a desert marigold)
Centropogon australis(White, 1790)(the fortescue, a waspfish) Centropogon australisGleason(a bellflower)
Cuspidaria cuspidata(Olivi, 1792)(a bivalve) Cuspidaria cuspidata(M. Bieb.) Takht.syn.Erysimum cuspidatum(a wallflower)
Ficus variegataRöding, 1798(the true fig shell, a sea snail) Ficus variegataBlume(the common red-stem fig)
Gaussia princeps(T. Scott, 1894)(a copepod) Gaussia princepsH.Wendl.(a palm)
Orestias elegansGarman, 1895(a pupfish) Orestias elegansRidl.(an orchid)
Tritonia pallidaStimpson, 1855(a nudibranch) Tritonia pallidaKer Gawl.(an iris)

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^"International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, Articles 53, 15, and 13".Retrieved14 June2013.
  2. ^Shipunov, Alexey (2011)."The problem of hemihomonyms and the on-line hemihomonyms database (HHDB)".Bionomina.4(1): 65–72.doi:10.11646/bionomina.4.1.3.
edit

Data related toList of valid homonymsat Wikispecies