Superstation(alternatively rendered as "super station"or informally as"SuperStation") is a term in North American broadcasting that has several meanings. Commonly, a" superstation "is a form ofdistant signal,abroadcast television signal—usually acommercially licensedstation—that is retransmitted viacommunications satelliteormicrowave relaytomultichannel televisionproviders (includingcable,direct broadcast satelliteandIPTVservices) over a broad area beyond its primaryterrestrial signal range.

Outside of their originatingmedia market,superstations are often treated akin to a conventional basic cable channel. Although six American television stations—none of which has widespread national distribution beyond home satellite or regional cable coverage—still are designated under this classification, these stations were primarily popularized between the late 1970s and the 1990s, in large part because of their carriage of sporting events from localprofessional sportsfranchises and theatrical feature films, offerings that were common of the time amongindependent stationsthat composed the superstation concept. These signals were also popular amongC-bandsatellite subscribers in rural areas where broadcast signals could not be picked up off-air.

Individual radio stations have also been redistributed via satellite as superstations throughcable radioservices offered by television providers and standalonesatellite radioservices. In other parts of North America, the definition of what may constitute even a de facto superstation varies depending on the country and the overall availability of the distributed stations.

Definition

edit

In its most precise meaning, per an amended definition under the Copyright Act of 1947, theFederal Communications Commission(FCC) in the United States defines asuperstationas a "television broadcast station, other than a network station, licensed by the [FCC], that is secondarily transmitted by a satellite carrier."[1]Superstations may fall into one of two classifications, based on the factoring of their extended reach for advertising and program acquisition purposes:[2]

  • Active superstations– Television stations that intentionally seek retransmission of their signal outside of their home market through an arrangement with a common satellite carrier firm (which uses an FCC-licensed satellite or satellite service facility to establish "point-to-multipoint" broadcast signal distribution, and which owns or leases a capacity or service on a satellite to provide such distribution), and markets the added distribution to program suppliers and advertisers; these stations target their programming and purchase advertising aimed at a national or regional audience, in addition to selling localized advertising viewable only on the originating broadcast feed;
  • Passive superstations– Television stations that make little or no acknowledgement of their superstation status in on-air and other marketing avenues; the station's signal is involuntarily redistributed without prior formal consent by a satellite carrier, which handles national advertising, marketing and some programming services for the cable-originated feed in lieu of the station's licensee, which itself maintains a neutral or obstinate stance toward the expanded distribution. Locally, the "passive superstation" prioritizes programming and advertising for their originating market, charging rates for such acquisitions and sales accordingly. The station may receive supplementary revenue from federalroyalty paymentsfor licensee-copyrighted programs, but subscriber fees paid by cable systems for the use of their signals are distributed to the common carrier.

Through an amendment to thecompulsory licensestatute of the 1947 copyright law, the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999 (SHVIA) created a sub-definition for "nationally distributed superstations," which the FCC constitutes as FCC-licensed television stations permitted byCongressfor retransmission by satellite carriers regardless of whether they reach "served" or "unserved" subscribers pursuant to the Copyright Act (effectively preventing them from subjection to geographic retransmission restrictions and absolving them from copyright liability if received by subscribers not residing in "unserved households" that have limited to no access to television stations offering similar programming). These stations must also fit the following tight date-specific criteria:[3][4]

  • "(A) [the applicable station] is notowned or operatedby oraffiliatedwith a television network that, as of January 1, 1995, offered interconnected program service on a regular basis for 15 or more hours per week to at least 25 affiliated television licensees in ten or more states; "
  • "(B) [the applicable station] on May 1, 1991, was retransmitted by a satellite carrier and was not a network station at that time; and
  • "(C) [the applicable station] was, as of July 1, 1998, retransmitted by a satellite carrier under the statutory license of Section 119 ofTitle 17, United States Code."

Beyond the six stations that fit that criteria (includingWPIX,KTLAandKWGN-TV,which, at present, uniquely constitute as both "network stations" as well as "nationally distributed superstations" under the FCC and the SHVIA's overlapping definitions for both), the definitions under SHVIA and Congressional retransmission consent rules (per Section 325 ofU.S. Code Title 47,as amended through the enactment of SHVIA) are restrictive, leaving little possibility that any television stations would in the future be able to befit such criteria and legally be considered a national superstation.

While the FCC defines "superstation" as a term, it does not prohibit its use by others outside of that scope; for example, primaryABC/subchannel-onlyCWaffiliateKYUR(channel 13) inAnchorage, Alaskahad collectively branded itself and its network ofrepeater stations(including full-power satellites inFairbanksandJuneau) as "Alaska's SuperStation "from 1996 to 2011. Some Spanish language networks likeTelemundoandUnivisionmay only have one station within an entire state that serves the largest city in their market and is distributed statewide via cable; one such case is Telemundo affiliateWYTU-LD(channel 63) inMilwaukee,which maintains cable distribution throughoutWisconsinviaCharter Spectrum,along with extended coverage onlow-power stationsinRockford, Illinois,andSouth Bend, Indiana,providing it broad coverage resembling a regional superstation though not marketing itself as such. The term has been (and, in a few cases, currently is) used by many other television and radio stations, but none of these operations is a superstation as defined by the FCC and solely use the term for marketing purposes. Similarly, the "superstation" term has also been occasionally stretched within the broadcasting industry to encompass major network affiliates imported by satellite common carriers to C-band and direct broadcast satellite providers—through packages such asPrimetime 24and its associated "Denver 5" tier, and the Netlink-distributed A3 package—that could not receive locally based network stations prior the implementation of the Satellite Television Extension and Localization Act in 1999.[5]

United States

edit

Early television superstations

edit

In the early days of television broadcasting, most largemedia markets– primarily those ranked among the top 20 inArbitronandNielsenestimates – had, by standards of the period, a sizeable number of television stations (sometimes as many as eight or nine in operation). Generally, these markets had threeVHFstations that operated asaffiliatesof the then dominant television networks –NBC,ABC, andCBS;one or morepublic televisionstations – which usually weremember stationsofNational Educational Television(NET) and its later successor, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS); one or moreUHFstations; and in the largest markets (such as New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago), at least one VHF station without a network affiliation. Theseindependent stationsgenerally relied on syndicated reruns of current or defunct network shows, classic theatrical feature films and some variety of local programming – such as news programs (ranging from as limited as hourly news updates to long-form newscasts, usually airing in prime time and, in some cases, at midday), children's programming or sporting events – to fill their broadcast schedules. Because of the available population reach of the region, most mid-sized and smaller media markets often had only the basic threenetwork-affiliatedstations (either in the form of three standalone affiliates or a primary-secondary structure in which one or two stations carried programs selected among the schedules of two or all three major networks), with imported network affiliates often serving as default outlets where one or more networks were not available locally.

Early community antenna television (CATV) systems were restricted from retransmitting distant signals to communities no more than approximately 100 miles (160 km) from the closest signal, which was a detriment to many small communities, especially sparsely populated areas of the Western United States, that were too distant from any receivable signal.[6]As CATV system capacity increased from three channels to five during the early 1950s, several communities in the Western U.S. began incorporating CATV systems usingmicrowave relay systemsthat made it possible to retransmit broadcast signals over great distances. In September 1956, Columbia Television Co. inPendleton, Oregonbegan using a microwave relay unit operated by Inland Microwave Co. to import threeSpokane, Washingtontelevision stations, ABC affiliateKREM-TV(channel 2, now a CBS affiliate), CBS affiliateKXLY-TV(channel 4, now an ABC affiliate) and NBC affiliateKHQ-TV(channel 6), to its subscribers. Building on this, othercable and CATV systemsin smaller municipalities and rural areas sought a foothold by "importing" broadcast television signals from larger nearby or distant cities for their customers, extending their reach beyond their normal coverage area (in the case of network-affiliated stations, this was to improve reception into areas that could not adequately receive the station's signal, whether within or at the edge of the contour, even with an outdoor antenna). Anxious for more viewers, the stations assisted by relaying their signals by wire or microwave transmission.

Within a few years, many other microwave-capable CATV system operators began to import out-of-market television signals based on program offerings they thought would appeal to their subscribers. Except for areas that were far enough out of a signal's reach to make this an unviable option, these systems selected major-market independent stations (often located anywhere between 60 and 200 miles [97 and 322 km] away from the relay towers) that aired popular feature films and local sports events. In 1962,Oneonta, New York-based Eastern Microwave Inc. (EMI) – a company that was developed after a technician employed with the parent CATV system observed the operations ofMontana-based microwave-to-CATV firm Western Microwave – was founded to relay the signals of WPIX,WNEW-TVandWOR-TV(channel 9, nowMyNetworkTVowned-and-operated stationWWOR-TVand licensed toSecaucus, New Jersey) to Oneonta Video and other CATV systems in surrounding areas. Eastern Microwave began distributing WOR-TV and either WPIX or WNEW (depending on the system) in March 1965 to three Upstate New York cable systems (Valley Cable Vision inCanajoharie,Carthage Video Division inCarthageand Cortland Video inCarthage).[7]Other microwave firms were also developed to relay independent television stations to cable systems, including H&B Microwave (a subsidiary of H&B Communications Corp., a major provider of CATV service and microwave relays throughout the U.S.), which began retransmitting the signal ofWGN-TV(channel 9) in Chicago to subscribers of the Dubuque TV-FM Cable Company inDubuque, Iowa;WGN's signal soon began to be imported via microwave to other CATV systems throughout theMidwest.

Because of changes to cable television regulations in the 1960s and 1970s, carriage of out-of-market independent stations increased significantly, allowing for the development of the first true "regional superstations." By way of the microwave connections,Ted Turnerbegan allowing the signal ofAtlanta, Georgiaindependent station WTCG (channel 17, later renamed WTBS and nowWPCH-TV) – which he purchased from station founder and fellow Atlanta-based entrepreneur Jack Rice Jr. in December 1969 in a $3-million all-stock transaction – to be distributed into other parts of the Southeastern United States (includingAlabama,TennesseeandSouth Carolina). Two major independent station operators began extending coverage of their stations throughout their respective home states and even surrounding states.Gaylord Broadcastingbegan allowing its independents—WUAB(channel 43, now a CW affiliate) inLorainCleveland,WVTV(channel 18, now a CW affiliate) inMilwaukee,KSTW(channel 11, now a CW owned-and-operated station) inTacomaSeattle,KTVT(channel 11, now a CBS owned-and-operated station) inFort WorthDallasand KHTV (channel 39, now CW affiliateKIAH) inHouston—to be distributed to cable systems in their respective regions, as did theChristian Broadcasting Network's Continental Broadcasting Network unit for two of its religious-secular hybrid independents, WYAH-TV (channel 27, now CW affiliateWGNT) inVirginia BeachandKXTX-TV(channel 39, now aTelemundoowned-and-operated station) in Dallas–Fort Worth.

WTCG: The first national superstation

edit

In December 1975, Ted Turner announced plans to redistribute Atlanta's WTCG via satellite to cable andC-band satelliteservices throughout the United States, beyond the 460,000 households in middle and southern Georgia and surrounding Deep South states that had been receiving its signal via microwave since the early 1970s. (Jack Matranga, then the president ofKTXL[channel 40, now a Fox affiliate] also unveiled similar plans for hisSacramento, Californiaindependent, which were never formulated to fruition.) Turner conceptualized the idea upon hearing ofpremium cable serviceHome Box Office (HBO)'s groundbreaking innovation to retransmit its programming nationwide usingcommunications satellitesbeginning with its September 30, 1975, telecast of the "Thrilla in Manila"boxing match.[8][9]With a more cost-effective and expeditious distribution method in place than would be capable through setting up microwave and coaxial telephone relay systems across the entire country, Turner got his idea off the ground by foundingSouthern Satellite Systems(SSS) – a common carrier uplink provider based inTulsa, Oklahoma– to serve as the station's satellite redistributor, and subsequently purchased an earth-to-satellite transmitting station to be set up outside of WTCG's Peachtree Street studios in Atlanta. To get around FCC rules in effect at the time that prohibited a common carrier from having involvement in program origination, Turner decided to sell SSS to formerWestern Unionvice president of marketing Edward L. Taylor for $1 and sold the transmitting station toRCA American Communications.Upon the sale's consummation in March 1976, Turner reached an agreement with Taylor to have the firm uplink the WTCG signal to theSatcom 1satellite.[10][11]

WTCG became America's first nationally distributed superstation on December 17, 1976, when its signal began to be relayed to four cable systems in theMidwesternand Southeastern United States. At 1:00 pm. ET (12:00 pm. CT) that day, subscribers of Multi-Vue TV inGrand Island, Nebraska,Hampton Roads Cablevision inNewport News, Virginia,Troy Cablevision inTroy, Alabamaand Newton Cable TV inNewton, Kansasbegan receiving WTCG's presentation of the 1948Dana Andrews-Cesar RomerofilmDeep Waters(which had started on the Atlanta broadcast signal 30 minutes prior).[12]Southern Satellite Systems initially charged prospective cable systems 10¢ per subscriber to transmit WTCG full-time and 2¢ per subscriber to carry it as an intermediary, post-sign-off timeshare service (from as early as midnight to as late as 6:00 a.m. local time).[12]One key legal point in Turner's contracts with programming distributors and advertisers was that they continued to charge him for programming content and commercial time as if his station were reaching only a local market. No one had thought of adding contract language to deal with satellite-delivered broadcasts of a television station to a much larger region. Turner Communications Group also chose to revise its advertising rates to better reflect WTCG's national cable audience in October 1978.[13]

Also setting WTCG apart from other superstations that would soon follow in its footsteps was that it directly promoted its programming to its national audience, made investments in programming production as well as acquisitions, and charged separate advertising rates at the national and local levels. Given Turner's deep pockets, the station paid for syndicated programming at (albeit reasonably cheaper) rates comparable to other national networks, rather than merely receivingroyalty paymentsfrom cable systems for programs to which it held the copyright. Cable systems found WTCG—one of the few American television stations offering a 24-hour-a-day programming schedule at the time—an attractive offering as it had an extensive film library heavily reliant on classic feature films (amounting to 30 movies per week out of the 2,700 titles that Turner had accrued since taking over the station), high-profile syndicated programs and games from various Atlanta-area sports teams (including theAtlanta BravesMajor League Baseball club, theAtlanta Hawksof theNBA- both of which were owned by Turner - and theAtlanta Flamesof theNHL). Soon after it was uplinked, an increasing number of cable television systems throughout the United States sought to carry WTCG as part of their channel lineups, ultimately making it the most widely distributed superstation for the rest of its existence under the format. By May 1978, WTCG was being received by 1.5 million households in 45 states, with figures suggesting that its reach had been increasing at the rate of 100,000 cable households per month; by the end of that year, the station was available through cable systems in all 50 states. By July 1979, the station (by then, known as WTBS) was available to 4.8 million cable subscribers plus an additional 556,000 households that received the station through other distribution methods (including microwave andMMDSservices).[11]

As WTBS, the station also served to help promote Turner's subsequent cable efforts, providing simulcasts of Cable News Network (CNN) and CNN2 (later Headline News and nowHLN) upon their launches in June 1980 and January 1982, respectively, as well as offering weekend-long marathons promoting the 1992 launch ofCartoon Network.(CNN also produced the station's only conventional, long-form news effort as a superstation, theTBS Evening News,a prime time newscast that ran from July 1980 to July 1984.) Aside from Turner's use of WTBS to help launch his other cable ventures, Southern Satellite Systems also distributed theUnited Press International(UPI) teletext news service (from 1978 to 1981) and theElectrateletext service (from 1981 to 1993) to thevertical blanking interval(VBI) of the WTBS feed. WTBS remained the most widely distributed superstation for the rest of its existence under the format; by 1987, WTBS was available to 41.6 million cable and satellite subscriber households nationwide. A separate feed of WTBS intended for distribution to cable providers outside the Atlanta market, incorporating national advertising substituting commercials intended for its Atlanta viewing audience, was launched in 1981. (Since the original incarnation of the syndication exclusivity rules had been repealed by that time, program substitutions on the national feed were very limited.)

WGN, WOR and other emerging superstations

edit

Turner's innovation signaled the development of basic cable programming in the United States and, within three years of WTCG achieving national status, was soon copied by other common carrier firms who decided to apply for satellite uplinks to distribute other independent stations as national superstations; however, while Turner had aggressively pursued national availability for WTCG, the other superstations that would soon emerge did not purposely seek such widespread reach and were either recalcitrant about having their signals imported without consent or ignored the issue directly and allowed their newfound expanded distribution to continue unfettered.

On November 9, 1978, Chicago independent WGN-TV became America's second national superstation, when Tulsa, Oklahoma-based common carrier firmUnited Video Satellite Group, Inc.– one of four applicants, along with Southern Satellite Systems,Lansing, Michigan-based American Microwave & Communications andMilwaukee-based Midwestern Relay Company, that the FCC granted approval to operate satellite transponders to relay the signal following the institution of the FCC's distant signal "open entry" policy for carrier firms – uplinked its signal onto a Satcom-3 transponder for redistribution to cable and satellite subscribers. United Video stepped in to assert uplink responsibilities as SSS had become embroiled in a transponder lease dispute with RCA American Communications in pertinence to a lawsuit involving RCA American and SSS's Satellite Communication Systems joint venture over the use of Satcom Transponder 18.[14][15]While TBS partnered with a satellite carrier to relay the WTBS Atlanta signal to a national audience, United Video used the legally structured loophole in the Copyright Act's compulsory license statute to uplink the signal of WGN without the prior consent of owner WGN Continental Broadcasting Company (later known asTribune Broadcasting), a model that would be used for other superstations that emerged in the coming years. United Video did not compensate WGN directly for the retransmission of its signal, though the station and its parent company receivedroyalty paymentsfrom cable systems that received the United Video-fed signal for any copyrighted programming (local newscasts, public affairs shows, locally originated children's programs and sports) that WGN owned and/or produced.

The station quickly turned into a major commodity among cable systems because of WGN's telecasts ofChicago CubsandChicago White Soxbaseball,DePaul Blue Demonscollege basketball, andChicago Bullsbasketball games and its locally popular in-house children's programs likeThe Bozo Show(the Chicago iteration of theBozo the Clowntelevision franchise). As the first superstation that offered long-form newscasts (compared to the newsbriefs offered by WTCG/WTBS for most of the time until 1996 as well as an abbreviated daily satirical newscast,17 Update Early in the Morning,which aired from 1976 to 1979 and mixed improvisational and scripted comedy with actual news content), upon moving its late evening newscast to 9:00 p.m.Central Timein March 1980, it also provided a prime time news alternative for viewers wanting to find out national and international headlines without having to wait for post-prime-time newscasts on local network stations, something of particular benefit tosnowbirdsand other Chicago residents who temporarily or permanently relocated elsewhere in the United States. Immediately after achieving superstation status, WGN-TV became available to an estimated approximately 200 cable systems and 1.5 million subscribers throughout the country;[16]its distribution was heavily concentrated in theCentral U.S.until the early 1980s and, by the end of the decade, had gradually expanded to encompass most of the nation with some gaps in theNortheastern U.S.that remained into the early 2010s. In 1985, Tribune—which would assume satellite distribution rights for the WGN national feed through its April 2001 purchase of the portion of United's UVTV unit that handled the feed's uplink and marketing responsibilities—began providing a direct microwave link of the WGN Chicago signal to United Video, providing it a second signal source in the event technical problems arose with the intercepted satellite signal and vice versa. WGN would become the only superstation to come close to reaching parity with WTBS, although it would continue to lag somewhat in coverage partly due to the two-year headstart of WTBS into the cable market.

KTVU(channel 2) inOakland–San Francisco followed behind on December 16, 1978, when Satellite Communications Systems uplinked the station onto a Satcom-1 transponder. (Holiday Inns Inc. would withdraw from the Southern Satellite Systems partnership by April 1979, leaving the latter to handle uplink and promotional responsibilities for KTVU.)[17][18]Despite a programming inventory comparable to other independents (including holding rights toSan Francisco Giantsbaseball games), SCS was unsuccessful in marketing KTVU to cable systems to reach the level of WTBS, WGN-TV and WOR-TV. In April 1980,Warner-Amex Satellite Entertainmentpurchased the transponder space from SCS to distribute upstart music video channelMTV;KTVU's national cable distribution would be reduced to systems that already carried the station in the Western United States by early 1981.

Eastern Microwave was somewhat more successful in distributing WOR-TV (which had been available to cable and CATV systems via microwave throughout much of the Northeastern United States since 1965), when it began retransmitting the New York station's signal to cable affiliates and C-band satellite receivers throughout the remainder of the country over transponder 17 of Satcom I in April 1979. Until WOR adopted a 24-hour schedule in 1980, the satellite feed initially included a backup feed of CBS-owned New York City stationWCBS-TV(channel 2) during WOR's off-hours. Even though WOR had a similar film library as other superstations (further boosted by the acquisition of theUniversal Picturesfilm library whenMCA Inc.acquired the station in a $387-million deal with the legally embattledRKO Generalin April 1987) and held rights to events from several New York-area professional sports teams (including theNew York Mets,theNew York Rangers,theNew Jersey Devilsand theNew York Knicksas well as college basketball games involvingBig East Conferenceuniversities), the station's distribution—while broad—was still relatively regionally scattered and paced far behind that of WTBS and WGN well into the 1990s.[19][20]

United Video would eventually gain an oligopoly in superstation distribution throughout the 1980s, building on its success with WGN-TV by commencing distribution of three other superstations and handling marketing responsibilities for one more (including three that were owned by then-WGN parent Tribune Broadcasting). On May 1, 1984, United Video—which picked up the station's satellite retransmission rights from Southern Satellite Systems—uplinked the signal of WPIX to theWestar Vsatellite;[21]this was followed on July 1, 1984, with its uplink of the signal of KTVT in Dallas–Fort Worth to the Satcom IV satellite, in a move undertaken by then-owner Gaylord Broadcasting to persuade cable providers that either already imported or were considering receiving the station's signal by microwave to begin transmitting the KTVT satellite feed. (United Video would later relocate KTVT's transponder to theSpacenet IIIin December 1988.)[22][23]On October 24, 1987, Netlink—then a subsidiary ofTele-Communications Inc.(TCI)—began distributingKWGN-TV(channel 2, now a CW affiliate) over Satcom I as part of the company's "Denver5 "direct-to-home package of television stations fromColorado's state capital that also included five default network feeds for home dish subscribers without access to a local network affiliate: NBC owned-and-operated stationKCNC-TV(channel 4, now a CBS owned-and-operated station), ABC affiliateKUSA-TV(channel 9, now an NBC affiliate), CBS affiliateKMGH-TV(channel 7, now an ABC affiliate), PBS stationKRMA-TV(channel 6) and Fox affiliateKDVR(channel 31). (KWGN's satellite feed was limited in its availability to home dish users; although, at its peak, the station itself had cable carriage throughoutColorado's Western Slope,Idaho,Kansas,Montana,Nebraska,New Mexico,South Dakota,Utah,WashingtonandWyoming.)[24]

On February 15, 1988, Eastern Microwave Inc. began distributing WSBK-TV and KTLA (channel 5) in Los Angeles via the Satcom I-R satellite. (WSBK-TV was selected primarily for its broadcasts ofBoston Bruinshockey andBoston Red Soxbaseball games, while KTLA was selected for its broadcasts ofLos Angeles Clippersbasketball andCalifornia Angelsbaseball games.) EMI chose to encourage rather than compel cable systems in the Northeastern U.S. that already received WSBK by microwave to begin receiving the satellite feed, and outsourced marketing of the signals to home dish owners through HBO andTEMPO Enterprises.Both superstations were notable for being the first to have their signals scrambled from the outset, using theVideocipher IIencryption system as well as the second and third EMI-delivered superstations to be encrypted, after having converted the WWOR satellite signal to an encrypted format in March 1986. (Within two months of EMI making the station available via satellite, United Video assumed marketing rights for KTLA under a partnership with Eastern Microwave.) Both services had their distribution limited primarily to the home dish market, whereas their cable distribution remained confined to their respective regions (New Englandfor WSBK and the Southwestern United States for KTLA).[25][26]

Unlike with WTCG/WTBS, Tribune Broadcasting (owners of WGN-TV, WPIX, KTLA and KWGN-TV until the completion of Tribune's purchase byNexstar Media Groupand concurring spin-off of WPIX to theE. W. Scripps Companyin September 2019, with both successor parents inheriting the classification for those stations) and the various owners of WSBK (Gillett Communications,Paramount Stations GroupandCBS Television Stations) have treated their satellite-delivered stations as "passive" superstations, opting to assert a neutral position over the relay of its signal by an intermediate common carrier to a national audience and leaving national promotional duties for multichannel television services and their subscribers to the satellite carriers that retransmitted their signals; in kind, neither station received direct compensation from United Video or EMI for retransmission or promotion of their signals but received royalty payments paid by carrier cable systems to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (CRT) for their retransmission of programs that are copyrighted in the name of the individual stations and/or their respective parent companies. This benefited the stations as it allowed them to continue paying for syndicated programming and advertising at local rates rather than those comparable to other national networks.

Even so, WGN would gradually switch to a more "active" stance in later years; Tribune began relaying the station's Chicago broadcast feed to United Video directly in 1985, and eventually acquired a majority stake in the rechristenedTV Guide Inc.'s UVTV satellite unit in April 2001 as the company was spinning off its satellite carrier assets to focus onTV Guide's magazine,direct-to-cable program listingsandinteractive program guideservices. Tribune, as a whole, had also shifted from opposing satellite retransmission of its stations sans permission to weighing in the benefits of having its stations be distributed to a wide audience, to the point of being in strong opposition against the reimposition of the syndicated exclusivity rules and filing court proceedings against major sports leagues that sought to prevent game telecasts involving local NBA and Major League Baseball teams from being imported to other media markets.[25]

Distant signal regulation and conflicts

edit

During the 1960s, the FCC began to severely restrict the importation of distant signals by larger CATV and cable systems, limiting their distribution to smaller-market and rural systems, based in part on the framework of the 1963Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. FCCcase, which stemmed from a legal challenge by Chief Washakie TV, then-owner of KWRB-TV (channel 10, now KFNE and operating a satellite station ofCasperFox affiliateKLWY) inRiverton, Wyoming,against the FCC license ofCody-based microwave relay firm Carter Mountain Transmission Corp., which intended to relay the signal of CBS/NBC affiliateKTWO-TV(channel 2) in Casper, Wyoming to CATV systems in three cities that were within the range of KWRB's off-air signal: Riverton,LanderandThermopolis.The FCC's denial of Carter's license renewal—because of its refusal to guarantee KWRB program duplication protection and the harm it would induce to the station, especially given Carter's refusal to offer the KWRB signal—was affirmed in a unanimous, three-judge decision by theU.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbiaon May 24, 1963, and a consideration refusal on the case by theU.S. Supreme Courton December 19.[27][28][29][30]

Further expansion of "proto-superstation" signals came through federal court rulings on separate lawsuits filed in July 1961 byUnited Artistsand WSTV Inc. (then-owner of WSTV [channel 9, nowWTOV-TV] inSteubenville, Ohio) overFortnightly Corp.'s importation of television stationsfrom thePittsburgh, PennsylvaniaandWheeling, West Virginia–Steubenville, Ohio markets to itsFairmontandClarksburg, West Virginiasystems and in December 1964 by CBS (overTelePrompTer's importation of stations from New York City,Albuquerque, New Mexico,Billings, MontanaandDenver, Coloradoto its systems inElmira, New York,Johnstown, PennsylvaniaandFarmington, New Mexico).[31][32]In the former case, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5–1 vote on June 18, 1968, that CATV systems like Fortnightly did not incur copyright liability by retransmitting distant signals as they acted more akin to "viewers" than broadcasters;[33]the latter case, ruled on May 2, 1972, by JudgeConstance Baker Motleyof theU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,affirmed that stance based on the Supreme Court's framework on theFortnightly v. United Artistscase.[34]

On March 31, 1972, the FCC implemented a broad package of cable industry regulations passed that February, which included two rules pertaining to distant signal importation. Among the implemented rules was the original incarnation of theSyndication Exclusivity Rules(or "SyndEx" ), which required cable providers toblack outany syndicated programs carried on out-of-market stations if a television station exclusively holds the local broadcast rights to a particular program, even if the out-of-market station has the same owner as the program's claimant station. The main difference between the original Syndex law and the version enacted in 1988 was that the blackout provisions applied to almost all programming, including special event programs distributed through syndication (such as theJerry Lewis MDA Telethonand theEaster SealsTelethon). The distant signal regulations allowed cable systems in the 100 largest markets to carry imported signals as a matter of right (including the addition of two distant signals not already available in the market), restricted cable systems in smaller markets to only being able to carry three network stations and one independent station (except for undefinable markets that would not be limited in the number of carried imported signals), and instituted leapfrogging rules that required systems importing distant independent stations from the top-25 markets to choose from one or both of the two markets closest to the provider'scity of licenseand any systems carrying the signal of a third independent being required to pick up a UHF or, if such a station is not available, VHF station located within a 200-mile (320 km) radius.[35]This interpretation of the rules became increasingly difficult to enforce as the number of cable-originated services increased, particularly following the emergence of communications satellites as a distribution method to the cable industry beginning in 1975.

FCC soon began outlining a regulatory framework that allowed cable systems to import some out-of-market signals without running into copyright liability. In August 1975, the agency began allowing unlimited signal importation upon either the final dailysign-offof a local "must carry"station or starting at 1:00 a.m. (EasternandPacific Time)/12:00 a.m. (in all other time zones), to avoid programming conflicts with late-night programing being carried "in progress" or avoid instances in which systems would have to run a blank screen until the start of the next program. As such, the distant signal would act as a timeshare feed on a cable channel otherwise occupied by a local or out-of-market broadcast station during the occupying station's normal sign-off period.[36]The last major obstacle to the creation of a national superstation was knocked down on December 19, 1975, when the FCC unanimously voted to repeal a 1972 rule requiring cable systems selecting a distant signal from among television stations in the top-25 media markets to only select a station from one of the two closest markets to the licensed system. The FCC Cable Television Bureau contended the formation of superstations was unlikely due to the absence of evidence that television stations economically benefited from cable carriage.[37]

On October 1, 1976, the U.S. Congress unanimously passed theCopyright Act of 1976in separate Senatefloorand Housevoice votes.The law provides cable systems with a compulsory license – which, under Section 111, also applies to "passive" (passthrough) satellite carriers, allowing them to retransmit "copyrighted programming from any over-the-air [television and radio] stations across the country [or, with range restrictions based on their distance from the U.S. border, from Canada or Mexico]" without seeking the originating station's express permission – that requires payment of a flat semi-annual royalty fee based both on the number of distant signals retransmitted by the system and on their total subscriber receipts (0.675% of their gross receipts for the first distant signal, 0.425% for any other signal up to the fourth and 0.2% for each signal beyond the fourth, with a separate fixed-rate exemptions for systems that have a semi-annual revenue either below $80,000 or between $80,000 and $160,000), prohibits any modifications to the imported broadcast signal and its copyrighted content (such as commercials substituted by the cable system, permitting local broadcast stations to sue the systems if violating modifications are made), and established the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, a five-member commission of theU.S. Copyright Officethat is tasked with reviewing cable and other royalty rates every five years (or sooner, if changes to program exclusivity or signal importation rules are made by the FCC) and compensates eligible owners of a copyrighted program who submit a written claim to receive the mandatory royalty paid by the cable system.[38][39][40]Compulsory license rules for broadcast signal distribution were extended to the home satellite industry on October 21, 1988, through the passage ofSatellite Home Viewer Act of 1988,which also restricted access to network programs exclusively to home dish users in "white areas" where broadcast signals are unviewable via antenna or cable (a provision that would become pertinent to most of the remaining superstations following network launches that took place in 1995).[41]

The distribution of these superstations eventually caused conflicts between these stations and providers of similar, or identical, programming in local markets. Among the earliest opponents to the emergence of superstations was theMotion Picture Association of America(MPAA), which in 1977, with the growing distribution of WTCG, petitioned the FCC to investigate the impact of and regulate superstations amid concerns over the potential financial losses for programs that MPAA member companies distributed to other television stations, which it posited would not be offset by royalty payments by cable systems. (The MPAA, which had its inquiry petition backed by theNational Association of Broadcasters[NAB] and broadcasting companies such as Kelly Broadcasting,McGraw-Hill BroadcastingandTaft Television & Radio Company,also lodged an unsuccessful bit to deny SSS's application to grant an expansion of WTCG's service toPuerto Rico,Alaskaand Canada.)[42][43]

On October 25, 1978, the FCC implemented an "open entry" policy for satellite resale carriers wanting to feed local television stations to cable systems, a move that would pave the way for the emergence of additional superstations. The policy also commenced review on FCC applications filed by four individual satellite carriers to authorize relay of other independent stations through theSatcomsatellite fleet:[13]

  • Southern Satellite Systems – seeking to carryKTTV(channel 11, now a Fox owned-and-operated station) in Los Angeles and WPIX (channel 11, now a CW affiliate) in New York City;[13][14]
  • Satellite Communication Systems (a joint venture ofHoliday Innsand SSS) – seeking to relay KTVU in Oakland–San Francisco;[13][14]
  • Eastern Microwave Inc. (a subsidiary ofNewhouse Newspapers) – seeking to relay WOR-TV (channel 9, nowSecaucus, New Jersey-licensed MyNetworkTV owned-and-operated stationWWOR-TV) in New York City andWSBK-TV(channel 38, now an independent station) inBoston;[13]
  • and United Video, which also sought to relay WOR (without an overnight backup feed) and WSBK.[13]

Reactions to the FCC's 1978 "open entry" policy ruling among program distributors ranged from "anger to passive acceptance," with concerns that satellite-distributed superstations would not adequately compensate program syndicators based on the acquired program's national availability and provide difficulty for program sales once content was sold to broadcasters in smaller markets with superstation importation via cable.[44]Then on November 4, the FCC rescinded a provision requiring cable systems seeking a waiver of signal importation limits to prove the unique circumstances that justified the waiver, while still requiring them to show that local stations would not suffer adverse public service impacts as a result of ratings or revenue losses from the imported signal, an action that was considered a greenlight to the creation of additional national superstations.[45]

While most superstations took on a passive stance on their distribution—programming to their local audience while benefiting tacitly from their extended distribution—a small number attempted to fight efforts to be redistributed; in March 1979,Metromedia—which was fighting an FCC grant allowing ASN Inc. (which also had been given permission to uplink WGN-TV and WOR-TV) to make KTTV an "involuntary superstation," claiming such retransmission would be a violation of a provision of Section 325 of the Communications Act that prohibited signal retransmission without a broadcaster's express consent, even though Section 111 of the 1976 Copyright Act effectively allowed such importation – asked the FCC to temporarily halt all authority for the satellite distribution and marketing of superstation signals.[46]Concurrent with the Metromedia petition, the NAB—later to be joined in the petition by, among others, the MPAA, the NBA, theNational Hockey League(NHL), Major League BaseballCommissionerBowie Kuhn,WGN Continental Broadcasting and ABC—urged the FCC to conduct an expedited rulemaking aimed at curbing "the harmful impact of superstation development on broadcast program service to the public," positing that they posed a serious threat to the ability of program producers to guarantee exclusive local rights to prospective stations seeking to buy programs being offered on the syndication market. ASN rebutted that KTTV had acknowledged the company was being authorized to redistribute its programming without distributor permission as the station could not do it on its own without shouldering liability. The issue was never fully settled, however, as ASN Inc. ceased operations amid financial issues before it could be able to retransmit KTTV's signal.[46][47]

The FCC repealed its remaining cable television regulations in a 4–3 vote on July 22, 1980, eliminating its restrictions on the number of broadcast stations that cable systems could carry and syndication exclusivity protections for local television stations on the basis that "local stations are not adversely affected when a cable system offers subscribers signals from television stations in other cities." The repeal of its signal importation and Syndex rules resulted in many cable systems beginning to carry other national superstations and additional regional out-of-market independents.[48]The following day (July 23), television station owner Malrite Broadcasting (later Malrite Communications) filed a lawsuit inUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eastern District of New Yorkto stop the rules from going into effect. The National Association of Broadcasters andField Communicationssubsequently filed stay motions to the FCC (which denied the requests) until the Malrite suit was adjudicated, amid concerns over harm that the repeal could incur to station revenue and local viewership of syndicated programs if the same program could be duplicated by superstations and other distant signals.[49][50][51]On June 19, 1981, the three-judge New York Court of Appeals panel unanimously affirmed the distant signal and syndication exclusivity repeals; after multiple delays, the repeal of both regulations went into effect one week later on June 24. The U.S. Supreme Court also affirmed the repeal by declining a request by the NAB to review the FCC order in January 1982.[52][53][54]

Interpretations of the copyright act also led to legal cases against superstation distributors. In April 1981, Tribune Broadcasting filed acopyright infringementsuit against United Video in theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,on grounds that United inserted teletext content from itsDow Jonesbusiness news service over the satellite feed'svertical blanking interval(VBI) during retransmissions of WGN's newscasts and other local programs in place of the teletextlistingsdata that the station was relaying to United's Electronic Program Guide (EPG) service (later Prevue Guide and now the entertainment-basedPop) in violation of the Copyright Act's passive carrier rules.[55][56]In October 1981, District Court Judge Susan Getzendanner denied an injunction to WGN Continental Broadcasting and dismissed the United Video case, determining that United was not required to carry the station's teletext transmission. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Northern District of Illinois disagreed, ruling in August 1982 that United Video must retransmit WGN-TV's VBI teletext where directly related to and part of the 9:00 p.m. news simulcast, noting that United had no grounds to claim the unseen teletext exempted it from copyright liability as the Copyright Act's definition of what constitutes as a public performance was broad enough to encompass indirect transmission through cable affiliates.[57][58]

The MPAA, the NAB (despite its insistence that the CRT had limited to no authority to set rates outside the mandatory five-year interval), sports leagues and other copyright holders soon asked the Copyright Office to hike its royalty rates to compensate for the loss of the distant signal carriage and syndication exclusivity deregulation.[59][60]On October 22, 1982, the Copyright Royalty Tribunal instituted a statutory license rate adjustment, establishing a 3.75% royalty fee of a cable system's gross receipts from subscribers (if their semi-annual revenue exceeds $214,000) for carriage of each previously impermissible distant signal and a SyndEx surcharge for programs transmitted on a previously blackout-subjected imported signal that was added after the rules were repealed, alongside existing royalties paid to the CRT "Basic Fund". The increase met with backlash from cable industry executives and lobbyists, led byNational Cable Television Association(NCTA) PresidentTom Wheeler,who were concerned that it would result in the removal of superstations and other distant signals as well as harm independent stations supported by the extended audience.[61]By the time the fees were imposed on March 15 (which was dubbed by cable systems as "Black Tuesday for Cable Viewers" ), NCTA estimates showed that about 6.3 million subscribers nationwide had lost access to one or more distant signals because of defections by cable systems that wanted to avoid paying the increased copyright fees. Dating back weeks prior to the deadline (as some systems chose to remove imported signals after the CRT delayed the fee imposition), various distant signals experienced a combined loss of 493 cable clearances, with WTBS, WGN-TV and WOR-TV making up half the defections with a combined loss of 249 clearances. Other cable-originated services benefited from the fee increases and distant signal defections, with the Cable Health Network (CHN; merged with Daytime in 1984 to formLifetime) experiencing the most growth; by March 1983, 1.2 million of the 9.1 million subscribers that CHN had at the time came from cable systems that replaced a distant signal with the channel. (Later estimates showed that WTBS lost 320,000 subscribers, while Eastern Microwave recouped around 200,000 subscribers for WOR and United Video recouped around 600,000 of its CRT-related losses of 1.2 million subscribers by May 1983.)[62][63][64]

On May 18, 1988, the FCC passed a new version of the Syndication Exclusivity Rights Rule. The new policy—spurred in part by a 1987 study conducted by the Association of Independent Television Stations (INTV), which provided evidence that programming duplication between superstations and local stations created significant ratings dilution for the latter group in certain time periods and a resulting significant loss of advertising revenue—not only allowed television stations to claim local exclusivity over syndicated programs (even if the out-of-market station has the same owner as the station with that particular exclusive program) and required cable systems to black out claimed programs; it also granted cable systems or carrier firms the ability to secure an agreement with the claimant station or a syndication distributor to continue carrying a claimed program through an out-of-market station, allowing some superstations to acquire partial or exclusive national cable rights to certain programs. The law also closed theterrestrial loopholethat allowed superstations like WGN and WTBS to continue paying local single market rates for programming acquisitions even as they were gaining national coverage, whilst selling that extended coverage to advertisers; this change made it so that other local stations which had their signals beamed to a satellite transponder – whether willingly or not – were charged appropriately for program content based on their actual national distribution, depending on arrangements with any given syndicator.[65][66][67][68][69]

A major concern brought about by the new rules was that it would force cable systems to drop certain superstations altogether, rather than shoulder expenses that would be incurred with the resultant blackouts and any responsibilities for acquiring substitute programming, thereby denying viewers access to sporting events popular among subscribers who received those signals. In preparation for the policy's implementation – which took effect on January 1, 1990, after FCC-enforced delays in the regulation's rollout – some superstations decided to indemnify cable systems from potential blackouts by ensuring that, at least, some programs that could be subjected to local syndication exclusivity claims could continue to be shown to their national audience, so as to prevent the loss of sports access. WTBS effectively limited the number of necessary blackouts or substitutions by licensing the majority of its programming for carriage on both its national and Atlanta area feeds. (Certain local programs carried by the station, such as public affairs and educational children's programs, were not carried on the TBS national feed, but these omissions were because those programs were strictly intended to fulfill local obligations for public affairs content.)[70]

United Video and Eastern Microwave respectively opted to devise standalone national feeds of WGN and WWOR, each incorporating an alternate schedule differing from the local broadcast signal to some degree—comprising both programs aired by the parent station for which the companies were able to secure the national retransmission rights (including some held over from before the SyndEx law was enacted), and supplementary programs acquired specifically for the national cable feed to absolve any holes caused by exclusivity claims—as well as separate national advertising, and in the case of WWOR, local advertising sold by individual cable systems. This would be achieved by "splitting" the signal, often requiring the use of a separate transponder to switch between the local feed and the alternate programming feed, so that certain programs viewed in the station's home market could be easily replaced with separate content that would only be shown over the national cable feed.[71][72]While United Video made efforts to clear as much of the programming seen on the WGN Chicago feed as it possibly could, EMI increasingly filled the nationalWWOR EMI Servicefeed with library content distributed byUniversal Television,MGM TelevisionandQuinn Martin—consisting of classic television series from the 1950s to the 1970s—as well as select programs from theChristian Science Monitortelevision service, alongside shows on WWOR's local program schedule that it was able to acquire retransmission rights at the national level (including local newscasts, sports and other WWOR-produced programming as well as special events, the station's overnight simulcast of theShop at Home Networkand a limited number of syndicated shows that did not have exclusivity claims in any market). Confusingly for WWOR's national cable viewers, on-airpromotionsfor programs not contracted to air nationally over the EMI Service were shown unaltered during simulcasts of programs aired on the New York signal. (This was not an issue with the WGN national feed, as United Video chose to substitute program promotions for shows airing on the Chicago signal that were not cleared on the national feed with those for the replacement shows exclusively seen on the latter, albeit still using station logos and promotional graphics used by the Chicago broadcast feed).

To blunt potential subscriber complaints over widespread programming blackouts, many cable systems removed both regional and quasi-national superstations (like WSBK, WPIX and KTVT) as well as other distant signals that their satellite carriers were unable or unwilling to take immediate steps to ensure their programming was "Syndex-proofed" to avoid blackouts. WGN and WTBS saw little negative impact to their distribution following the Syndex implementation, with WGN actually heavily benefiting from provider removals of other superstations (including then sister station WPIX) during the early 1990s, allowing for further expansion of its distribution reach. EMI estimated simultaneous losses of 500,000 subscribers and an increase of around one million households to its cable distribution of WWOR, the latter being attributed to some local cable systems adding the Syndex-proof WWOR EMI Service feed. Most complaints over the removal of some regional and quasi-national superstations were because of the loss of access to coverage from regional professional sports teams (such as theBoston Red Soxvia WSBK, theTexas RangersandDallas Mavericksvia KTVT and the New York Yankees via WPIX), leading some systems to resort to cherrypicking sports from the removed superstations to mollify subscribers and local politicians acceding to complaints from their constituents by pushing other cable systems to seek solutions to resume sporting events lost through the removal of those superstations. (For example, amid public pressure from the Providence City Council and Rhode Island Department of Public Utilities and Carriers, Dimension Cable Services'sProvidence, Rhode Islandsystem [now operated byCox Communications], which removed the 24-hour WPIX feed upon the Syndex rollout, began placing the station's Yankees telecasts on a local origination channel in May 1990, in exchange for paying United Video full-time copyright fees.)[73][74][75][76]The WWOR EMI Service—despite having SyndEx-proofed its programming schedule—and WPIX would each see their distribution erode during the early 1990s, as some of the cable affiliates that carried either superstation began replacing them with the WGN national feed.[77][78]

The passage of theSatellite Home Viewer Act of 1988on October 19, 1988, extended the compulsory license to direct-to-home (DTH) satellite services, protecting distribution of broadcast signals to dish owners under existing copyright statutes. (The act's provisions primarily benefited so-called "affiliate superstations," provided that the distant network stations could only be distributed to "unserved households" that were unable to receive a local affiliate off-air.)[41][79]For many years after the passage of SyndEx for cable systems, the satellite television industry remained exempt from syndication exclusivity regulations, resulting in subscribers of direct broadcast satellite and C-Band providers continuing to be able to view all programming seen on the local broadcast signals of national and regional superstations (except where the provider already offered the SyndEx-compliant cable feed). An FCC inquiry on whether SyndEx rules should be applied to home dish services concluded in January 1991 that extending those rules to satellite "would be technically and economically infeasible" as equipment that would allow programs to be selectively blacked out based on the media market would not likely be marketed until after the initial compulsory license expired in 1994 and that the expense of "preventing viewing by a relatively few authorized home satellite dish owners for a relatively short period" would be greater than that incurred by cable providers.[80]

Copyright laws pertaining to broadcast signal carriage by satellite providers were eventually overhauled through amendments to the Communications Act of 1996 that were added through the November 1999 implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act (SHVIA), which allowed satellite providers to carry local broadcast signals on the Congressionally-suggested condition that the FCC develop rules protecting the sports, network and syndicated programming rights of local broadcasters. On November 2, 2000, the FCC approved identical network non-duplication, syndication exclusivity and sports blackout rules applying to the six FCC-designated national superstations (WGN-TV, KTLA, WPIX, KWGN-TV, WSBK-TV and WWOR-TV) and, in the case of the sports blackouts, other distant signals retransmitted over home dish units to an extent where it would be "technically feasible and not economically prohibitive;" this statute would eventually limit distribution of the fivegrandfatheredstations to rural areas without distributors of similar programming. The rules, which took effect on November 30 and also applied to satellite common carriers that uplinked and distributed the superstations, gave satellite providers at least four months to implement duplication protections for network and syndicated programs and 60 days notice to comply with sports and programming blackout requests. An exemption to the Communications Act'sretransmission consentstatute in the SHVIA rules allowed satellite carriers to retransmit a superstation signal absent the station's prior written consent under the latter two aspects of the aforementioned FCC-defined "national superstation" criteria, provided that the service complies with the non-duplication, syndication exclusivity and sports blackout rules. (TBS was not covered under the SHVIA's de facto distant signal grandfathering clause as its national feed was considered a technically separate entity from its over-the-air parent feed in Atlanta. The act's network non-duplication and Syndex rules were thought to negatively affect the distribution of WGN as its national feed was compliant with those restrictions.)[81][82][83][84][85]The Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act (SHVERA), signed into law on December 8, 2004, allowed satellite providers to carry "significantly viewed"superstations and distant network signals to subscribers royalty-free and with the payment of retransmission consent, provided that the subscriber also receives local stations from the provider, and permitted providers to deliver superstations to commercial businesses.[86]

Conflicts with professional sports leagues

edit

Much of the appeal of superstations to viewers came from the national carriage of sporting events involving professional league teams that contracted their telecasts to the originating stations within home markets. Although professional sports teams benefited heavily from their national exposure—especially with regards to WTCG/WTBS's carriage of the Atlanta Braves and the Atlanta Hawks, and WGN-TV's broadcasts of sporting events featuring the Chicago Cubs, Chicago White Sox and Chicago Bulls—superstation broadcasts ofNational Basketball Association(NBA) andMajor League Baseball(MLB) games were met with resistance from league commissioners, who contended these telecasts—regardless of the positive effects on team loyalty—diluted the value of their national television contracts with other broadcast and cable networks. Some superstation operators (like Ted Turner and formerTribune Companyvice president John Madigan) note a lack of corroborating evidence of any negative effects on game attendance and league revenue, suggesting that sports leagues have used superstation telecasts of their games as a scapegoat for financial problems incurred by the league caused by other factors such as the performance of certain teams and management issues.[87]

The only federal restrictions applying to sports events shown on superstations and other imported signals was the so-called "same-game rule," enacted by the FCC in June 1975 to prohibit cable systems from retransmitting a sports event through a distant signal within a 35 miles (56 km) zone around the city of the home team's arena if the game is not airing on a local television broadcaster, with a subsequent amendment requiring the broadcast rights-holder to inform local cable systems of game deletions no later than Monday of the preceding calendar week of the proposed deletion. (Other leagues had proposed a broader blackout zone: theNational Hockey League[NHL] suggested that the protection zone should be extended across a team's entire home market, while theNational Football League[NFL] and Major League Baseball each advocated for a 75-mile (121 km) zone, with the latter also seeking a 20-mile [32 km] zone around the cities ofminor leaguefranchises and a 35-mile [56 km] zone around a team's local television rights-holder.)[88][89][90]The major professional sports leagues eventually imposed their own broadcasting restrictions around the number of games that could air annually on any out-of-market stations, which resulted in superstations sometimes substituting sports events with syndicated programming and feature films in adherence. (This had an adverse effect on WGN, WWOR and WPIX, which each had news departments, as some of their respective newscasts would be subjected to substitutions if a sports event—particularly one shown during prime time—was preempted.)

One of the first known legal efforts to challenge superstation telecasts of sports events came in April 1981, when Eastern Microwave Inc. filed a declaratory judgement inquiry in theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of New York,contending that its cable retransmissions of WOR's New York Mets telecasts did not constitute copyright infringement. Mets ownerDoubleday Sports Inc.contended it had the right to control the telecasts outside of its home market and informed EMI that the telecasts would be recorded upon transmission, effectively subjecting them to copyright by Doubleday; EMI contended that it was exempt from paying royalties for the telecasts under Section 111 (a) (3) of the Copyright Act, which contends that the secondary transmission of a program by an intermediary carrier did not infringe upon a copyright if the carrier had "no direct or indirect control over the content or selection of the primary transmission or over the particular recipients of the secondary transmission," and if the carrier's transmission activities only pertained to providing "wires, cables or other communications channels for the use of others."[55]On March 12, 1982, District JudgeNeal P. McCurnruled that EMI and other satellite carriers were liable for royalty payments to program suppliers. TheUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit(in a reversal of the Central District Court decision on October 20) and the Supreme Court (in a February 25, 1983, decision refusing review of the case) both concurred with EMI's arguments, holding that the company constituted as a "passive" carrier exempt from copyright fee payments—along with noting that EMI had only one available transponder for its extraterrestrial services and "naturally" sought to re-transmit "a marketable station" —under the Copyright Act's existing structure.[91][92][93]

Outside of the teams that benefited from the broader exposure the telecasts gave them, Major League Baseball had long felt that superstations ate into their ability to gain revenue from agreements with national networks like ESPN. (As a comparison, in 1992, ESPN televised 175 baseball games as part of a broader $100-million-per year deal at a per-game cost of $571,428, about 12 times more than what TBS, WGN, WWOR and WPIX paid cumulatively for their respective team-based packages that year, encompassing a combined 435 games for an annual fee of $20 million or a per-game cost of $46,000). A succession of three MLB Commissioners—which, among the position's responsibilities, handles negotiations for all national broadcasting contracts but is prohibited under the federal compulsory license law from controlling carriage of superstation telecasts—attempted to curb the telecasts or convince superstations to pay a higher fee for the national telecasts to varying success. After Bowie Kuhn was appointed Commissioner in 1981, team owners lobbied the league to place a tax on superstation telecasts; the proposed tax passed in a 24–2 vote (with the Braves and the Cubs dissenting). Other legal attempts by Kuhn and league management to reduce the superstation telecasts ultimately failed because of federal copyright laws that protected the broadcasts. The tax was implemented in January 1985, under successorPeter Ueberroth,with Ted Turner becoming the first MLB team owner to agree to the revenue-sharing plan, under which he made annual contributions to the league's Central Fund for the continued right to carry Braves baseball games over WTBS. The Tribune Company (then-owner of WGN and WPIX, the former of which cited its absent accounting of its national cable audience in its advertising rates for its initial participation reluctance, as well as the Cubs),MCA Inc.(then owner of WWOR) and Gaylord Broadcasting (then owner of KTVT) soon each agreed to contribute to the fund for the right to air Cubs, White Sox, Yankees, Mets and Rangers games outside the teams' respective home markets. (The total payment reflected the reach of each superstation; by 1992, Turner and the Cubs paid $12 million and $6 million, respectively, reflecting WTBS's 58-million subscriber audience and WGN's 35 million subscribers at the time, whereas WWOR and WPIX each chipped in only $1 million, better reflecting their more regionalized distribution.).[94][95][96][97]

Concerns by many of Major League Baseball team owners that the share would be used to buoy the expansion of KTVT into a fourth national superstation (a move that would have had to be undertaken by United Video as it was the station's satellite redistributor), American League team owners voted down Gaylord Broadcasting PresidentEdward L. Gaylord's initial bid to purchase 33% of the Texas Rangers on January 11, 1985, in a 9–5 confirmation vote (below the two-thirds votes needed to approve the sale). Ueberroth would invoke a "best interests of baseball" clause on February 8 to approve the sale and associated broadcast contract with KTVT, which required Gaylord Broadcasting to pay re-transmission fees for games that the station televised outside of its six-state cable footprint.[98][99][100][101][102]Similar issues also prevented Gaylord from buying the 58% interest by majority-ownerEddie Chiles,a share that Chiles would ultimately sell in a $46-million deal to an ownership group led by eventualTexas Governorand U.S. PresidentGeorge W. Bush,real estate developerH. Bert Mackand investor Frank L. Morsani in April 1989.[103][104]

Ueberroth's successor,Fay Vincent,took a more hard-line approach against baseball telecasts shown over superstations. During his two-year tenure as league commissioner, he tried to introduce contract language in local broadcast agreements that would allow a team to terminate the contract if broadcasts were re-transmitted "by any means" to more than 200,000 homes outside the team's territory, launched a petition to the FCC to redefine how its non-duplication rules constitute a "network program" to force cable systems to blackout superstation-licensed live sports broadcasts, and asked Congress for the repeal the compulsory copyright license and the inclusion of an amendment to theCable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992that would force superstations to enforce blackouts of sporting events if a conflict occurred with a local telecast of the same game. (The latter amendment spurred an on-air campaign by Turner Broadcasting, which saw responses, mostly opposed to the proposed legislation, by more than 17,000 viewers.)[105][106][107][108][109][110]Then in July 1992, in a move seen by some as targeting the Cubs' WGN telecasts, Vincent ordered a realignment of theNational League(NL) that sought to move the Chicago Cubs and theSt. Louis Cardinalsto theNational League Westand the Atlanta Braves and theCincinnati Redsto theNational League Eaststarting with the 1993 season. Tribune staunchly opposed the proposed realignment, filing abreach of contractlawsuit accusing Vincent of overstepping his authority in ordering the realignment and arguing it would dilute existing team rivalries. (The realignment proposal also sparked concerns that local advertising revenue for WGN's prime time newscast would be depressed by frequent post-9:00 p.m. [Central Time] delays during the regular season from an increased number of Cubs games involvingPacific Time Zone-based Western Division teams starting in the late evening in the eastern half of the country. The Braves as well as the Cubs'American League[AL] rivals, the Chicago White Sox, had each already played many late-evening [Eastern/Central Time] games during the regular and postseason against West Coast teams in the western divisions of theNationalandAmerican Leagues.) U.S. District JudgeSuzanne B. Conlonissued a preliminary injunction in favor of Tribune and the Cubs on July 23, 1992, six weeks prior to an 18-9-1motion of no confidenceagainst Vincent among team owners on September 4.[111][112][113][114][115]Impacts to baseball's attempts to curb superstation telecasts were felt following Vincent's subsequent resignation as MLB Commissioner on September 7, 1992; one week after his departure, the proposed blackout amendment failed to make a Cable Television Act reconciliation bill due to the lack of support for the provision in the Senate.[116]

The NBA also undertook actions to limit superstation telecasts of the league's games. In 1982, it began prohibiting television stations that reached at least 5% of all out-of-market cable households from airing games that conflicted with those shown on the league's national cable partners (at the time,ESPNandUSA Network); this transitioned in June 1985 to a 25-game limit on the number of seasonal NBA telecasts that could be licensed to superstations (sixteen fewer than the 41-game maximum under existing NBA local broadcast rules).[117]Concerned with the potential impact that the concurring returns of the Chicago Bulls and the Atlanta Hawks to WGN and WTBS, respectively, would have on its national contracts withNBCand ESPN, in April 1990, NBA CommissionerDavid Sternfurther reduced the amount of superstation-licensed NBA telecasts to 20 games per season. This sparked a 5½-year legal battle against the NBA by Tribune Broadcasting and Chicago Bulls parent Chicago Professional Sports L.P. The conspiracy and antitrust lawsuit filed by the co-plaintiffs in theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinoison October 16, 1990, alleged that the 20-game limit was aimed at "phas[ing] out such superstations telecasts entirely in increments of five games each year over the next five years," a separate plan proposed by Stern that was never voted upon by NBA team owners. (The NBA contended the restriction was exempt from antitrust law under a provision of theSports Broadcasting Act of 1961,which was deemed in later rulings to only be applicable to the sale or transfer a national game package to a television network and not those involving individual teams.)[118][119][120][121]After four separate rulings in favor of Tribune and the Bulls issued by Northern District JudgeHubert L. Will(on January 26, 1991, and January 6, 1995),[122][123]theSeventh Circuit Court of Appeals(on April 14, 1992),[124]and theU.S. Supreme Court(on November 5, 1992),[125]a Seventh Circuit judiciary panel overturned their 1992 ruling on September 10, 1996,[121]which forced WGN-TV – which had been allowed to air at least 30 Bulls telecasts over its local and national feeds between the1992–93and1995–96seasons per agreement between the lawsuit parties – to relegate the 35 Bulls games it was scheduled to air during the1996–97 seasonexclusively to the Chicago area signal. (The embargoed Bulls telecasts were supplanted on the WGN superstation feed by syndicated feature films, and caused the national preemption of the station's 9:00 p.m. newscast on nights when prime time games overran into the time slot.)[126][127][128][129][130]Tele-Communications Inc.(TCI, now defunct) cited the national restrictions on the Bulls as partly being behind its December 1996 decision to remove the WGN national feed from most of its systems throughout the country, affecting around 3.5 million TCI subscribers by March 1997, though criticism over the move led TCI to rescind its plans to remove the WGN national feed from affected systems inIllinois,Indiana,Iowa,WisconsinandMichiganwith the remaining systems reinstating WGN through 1999.[131][132][133][134][135]The Bulls, WGN and the NBA reached a settlement on December 12, 1996, allowing WGN-TV to air the league broadcast maximum of 41 games for the remainder of the 1996–97 season (35 that would air only on the Chicago signal and twelve that would be shown on both the local and superstation feeds). From the1997–98 seasonthereafter, the number of games permitted to air on the superstation feed increased to 15 per year. The parties also agreed to replace the NBA's licensing tax for superstations with a revenue sharing model, under which the NBA would collect 50% of all advertising revenue accrued from the national WGN telecasts.[136][137]

TBS was able to work around these issues by supplementing its Atlanta-originated sports broadcasts with more nationalized sports fare, including a package of regular season NBA games involving the league's other teams, early roundconference playoff gamesand theNBA draft(beginning with the1984–85 seasonand continuing until Turner Broadcasting shifted the NBA cable rights to sister channelTNTin2002),[138]professional wrestlingprograms from several promotions (includingGeorgia Championship Wrestling,the World Wrestling Federation [now theWWE],Jim Crockett Promotions,Mid-South Wrestlingand finally, the Turner-ownedWorld Championship Wrestling) until 2001,[139][140]NCAAcollege footballgames (from1981to1992and from2002to2007 season),[141][142]variousNASCARauto races and the Olympics-inspiredGoodwill Games.The WGN national feed also was prohibited from carryingChicago Blackhawkshockey games, when WGN-TV assumed local rights to the team during the2007–08 season,due to broadcast rights restrictions imposed by the NHL to protect the league's exclusive national broadcasting contracts withESPNand later ajoint broadcast-cable contractwithNBCUniversal.

Evolution and decline; the remaining superstations

edit

Even though superstations remained reasonably popular among cable and satellite subscribers, in no small part because of team-based sports broadcasts, various changes to the television industry beginning in the 1990s—especially the proliferation of cable-originated program services and the resultant increase in original programming produced by many cable channels—as well as existing distant signal policies—such as the syndication exclusivity rules—precipitated the decline in their viability. As early as 1986, with the launch of the Fox Broadcasting Company, a handful of the intrastate superstations – such asKMSP-TV(channel 9, now a Fox owned-and-operated station) inMinneapolisSt. Paul,KSHB-TV(channel 41, now an NBC affiliate) inKansas CityandWKBD-TV(channel 50, now a CW owned-and-operated station) in Detroit—that continued to maintain reasonable out-of-market distribution after the March 1983 copyright royalty increase had terminated their carriage agreements with cable providers beyond their home markets because of the presence of local independent stations that were able to serve as prospective Fox affiliates in many of the areas within the imported stations' remaining distribution footprint. Additional decline in the availability of intrastate superstations came in the mid-1990s, when many of the remaining regional superstations let their carriage agreements expire or terminated them outright amidlocal network affiliation shufflesthat caused stations such as KTVT, KSTW andKPHO-TV(channel 5, now a CBS affiliate) inPhoenixtaking on affiliations with one of theBig Threenetworks (ABC, CBS or NBC), as contractual and federal restrictions prevented them from maintaining regional distribution upon becoming major network affiliates.

Very few of these stations reduced their distribution as a result of taking affiliations with either the United Paramount Network (UPN) orThe WB Television Network.In fact, in December 1993,Time Warnerpermitted Tribune Broadcasting and United Video to have WGN-TV—which initially had intended to maintain a limited, if any, relationship with the network—act as a de facto national feed for The WB to cover smaller and mid-sized markets where extra time was needed for the network to fill absences in local affiliate coverage. (The Tribune Company held minority ownership in The WB from August 1995 until the founding of successor The CW in January 2006, when the company relinquished its interest to avoid partially shouldering The WB's shutdown expenses.) Station management had expressed concerns over the potential negative impacts fulfilling commitments to the network's soon-to-be-expanded program offerings would have on its sports broadcast rights and, by association, its national distribution; Time Warner rectified those issues by agreeing to reduce the network's initial schedule to one night per week (from two) in exchange for leasing airtime on the WGN national feed.[143][144][145][146]WGN carried the full WB programming schedule—including theKids' WBchildren's program block, which was not carried by the WGN Chicago signal until 2004—nationwide from the network's January 1995 launch until October 1999, when carriage of the network (outside Chicago) was discontinued upon mutual agreement between Time Warner and Tribune/United Video to limit programming conflicts with The WB's initial charter affiliates and other local broadcast andcable-onlyaffiliates that joined the network over the previous four years.[147][148]In direct contrast, WWOR (owned at the time by network parentChris-Craft/United Television) restricted availability of UPN programming to its New York-area signal,[149][150]believed to be the result of a network non-duplication claim filed by non-equity network partnerParamount Televisionthat prohibited Eastern Microwave from using the WWOR EMI Service as a national UPN feed. The downside of the Paramount decision was that, from January 1995 until over-the-airdigital multicastingbecame viable in the first half of the 2000s, it left most or all UPN programming unavailable in some mid-sized and most smaller markets where the network was not able, at least initially, to gain even secondary affiliate clearances.

WWOR—although it technically never gave up its superstation status—ceased distributing a national cable feed on December 31, 1996, a move made byAdvance Entertainment Corporation(which assumed ownership of corporate cousin Eastern Microwave Inc. and its satellite distribution rights to WWOR and WSBK-TV earlier in 1996) to avoid having to pay an increased royalty fee for the first six months of 1997 that the Copyright Royalty Tribunal instituted on January 1, 1997. To the consternation of many cable systems because of how it marketed the action, weeks before the WWOR EMI Service was to be discontinued,Discovery Networksquickly purchased the feed's satellite transponder slot from Advance Entertainment to expand distribution of the fledglingAnimal Planetnetwork. About 12.5 million cable subscribers (most of which resided east of theMississippi River) lost access to WWOR's programming as a consequence.[151][152][153]Amid outcry from satellite dish owners, less than one week after the EMI Service feed was discontinued, the National Programming Service, LLC (NPS) subsidiary of carrier firmAll American Directuplinked the station's New York-area broadcast feed on a separate satellite transponder for exclusive distribution by satellite providers; since syndication exclusivity rules did not apply to home dish providers at the time, the NPS-delivered feed featured all syndicated and UPN network programs that could be seen by viewers in the New York City market. (Because of this, select cable providers picked up the NPS feed to serve as a default UPN programming source in markets where no local UPN affiliate existed, either due to the lack of a standalone fifth or sixth secular commercial station for an exclusive affiliation – particularly through the loss of affiliate clearances to The WB, as was the case in certain markets affected by that network's 1997 agreement with theSinclair Broadcast Group– or the lack of a secondary clearance with an existing commercial network station.) The NPS-delivered feed was discontinued in 1999 to repurpose the transponder to distribute the national feed of Pax TV (nowIon Television), thoughDish Networkcontinues to distribute WWOR nationwide as of 2019,primarily in areas that do not have a local MyNetworkTV affiliate.

TBS,the national version of WTBS, evolved into a hybrid superstation on January 1, 1998. Upon undertaking the operational conventions of a traditional basic cable service, the national channel—which, following a series of name alterations between 1987 and 1996, was known at the time as TBS Superstation—began to collect subscriber fees and, as it was now effectively exempt from the 1976 Copyright Act's signal modification restrictions, began offering systems the ability to lease advertising time to participating providers for the sale andinsertionof local commercials. The TBS cable channel, however, retained the WTBS signal as its originating feed and continued to simulcast almost all of the programming seen in the Atlanta market (except for Atlanta-targeted advertisements, and customary weekend morning blocks of public affairs and syndicated educational programs intended to fulfill FCC public service andChildren's Television Actrequirements that were shown exclusively on WTBS).[154][155]As a byproduct of anational broadcast dealreached between Turner/Time Warner and Major League Baseball that granted TBS rights to carry regular season and postseason games involving various MLB teams (ending its team-specific focus on games involving the Atlanta Braves that traced before it achieved national distribution), TBS eventually gave up its superstation status altogether on October 1, 2007, when the TBS cable channel and WTBS formally separated their programming schedules and branding. The former Atlanta broadcast feed concurrently changed its call letters to WPCH-TV (rebranding as "Peachtree TV" ) and began targeting its programming exclusively toward its home market, limiting its distribution within North America (outside the Atlanta market) to Canadian television providers that were already receiving the station prior to the TBS split.[156][157]

The separation of TBS from its founding Atlanta parent left the WGN national feed – which became known as Superstation WGN in November 2002 and then asWGN Americain May 2008 – as the last remaining superstation to be transmitted nationwide through all multichannel television distribution methods, whereas the other six remaining superstations are available only through satellite television. Into the 2000s, WGN America increasingly relied less on WGN-TV program simulcasts as fewer syndicated programs seen on the Chicago feed were able to be given national "full-signal" clearances, opting to plug holes in the schedule with more "SyndEx-proof" syndicated programs. (Programming shared between the national and local WGN feeds in later years consisted of a limited number of syndicated programs and selected feature films; most Chicago Cubs and White Sox baseball and select Bulls basketball games; select local news and public affairs programs; and certain local and syndicatedspecials.) The channel also chose not to carry newscasts and Chicago-originated lifestyle and entertainment programs that WGN-TV added to its schedule as the station began to better emphasize news and other locally produced content starting in 2008. Following the Tribune Company's emergence fromChapter 11 bankruptcy protectionamid a debt-laden 2007leveraged buyoutby real estate investorSam Zelland subsequent takeover by threeprivate equity firms(Oaktree Capital Management,JPMorgan ChaseandAngelo, Gordon & Co.), Tribune unveiled plans to turn WGN America into a conventional basic cable network incorporating original programming content, to increase the channel's visibility and stave off potential defections from television providers because of the expense of paying increasing copyright fees to transmit programs now readily available elsewhere. (Through this conversion, WGN America began phasing out all local news and sports programming simulcast with the Chicago signal, concluding with the removal of its morning and midday newscasts from WGN America's lineup on December 15, 2014.[158][159]) WGN's superstation status ended (in the United States) on December 16, 2014, when all remaining simulcasts of the Chicago station's local news, public affairs and sports programming were removed from its schedule and the first carriage agreements that shifted WGN America from limited to expanded basic tiers (involvingComcast Xfinitysystems in Chicago and four other major markets) went into effect.[160][161]WGN-TV would eventually be made available throughout the United States once again in the spring of 2015, when antenna manufacturerChannel Masterincluded the Chicago-area feed among the initial offerings on its short-livedover-the-top streaming serviceLinearTV.[162]

The five remaining "true" superstations—WPIX, KTLA, KWGN-TV, WWOR-TV and WSBK-TV—are carried on some rural cable providers and via satellite through Dish Network and C-Band systems. Since the 1988 syndication exclusivity rules were implemented,WKAQ-TV(channel 2) inSan JuanandWAPA-TV(channel 4) inGuaynabo, Puerto Ricohave been the only American television stations to achieve superstation status, although neither fits the legal criteria of a superstation as defined by the FCC. WKAQ's signal became available in the mainland United States in 2001, when Telemundo Group converted its Telemundo Internacional cable channel—which began as acable news channelunder the name Telenoticias in 1994—into a national feed of the station, branded asTelemundo Puerto Rico;the feed is available in the contiguous United States through select cable providers and via satellite on Dish Network andDirecTV.LIN Television Corp.began distributing a direct-to-satellite national feed of WAPA-TV,WAPA America,on September 1, 2004, through DirecTV's Para Todos Spanish-language tier; WAPA America is also available through select cable providers and on Dish Network.[163][164](Unlike the five superstations licensed within the U.S. mainland, WAPA's programming is generally "SyndEx-proof" as its schedule consists of domestically produced programs and acquired programming not widely available on broadcasters elsewhere within the Continental United States.) Since its inception in 1994, Dish Network has offered ana la cartetier of all five aforementioned mainland superstations to subscribers outside of the stations' respective home markets. The tier continued to be sold for many years following the 1999 passage of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act, despite concerns expressed by representatives for former Dish parentEchoStarthat prevalent program blackouts caused by requests from local broadcast licensees made under SHVIA syndication exclusivity and sports blackout provisions could force it to drop the five mainland superstations from its lineup. Indeed, such requests have led Dish Network to stop offering one or more of the stations in some markets in recent years, culminating in Dish ceasing all future sales of the superstation tier on September 19, 2013. (A grandfathering waiver exists for subscribers who purchased the tier prior to the cut-off date, allowing them to continue receiving the superstation package barring they ever cancel their subscription to the tier or to Dish Network.)[165]

Canada

edit

Canada does not have any television stations that operate as "superstations" in the traditional construct of the term. Technically, virtually every Canadian terrestrial television station is a superstation, as almost every local television station in that country – most commonly those that are owned-and-operated stations, as well as a few affiliates, of the five nationalEnglish-languagenetworks (CBC Television;theCTV Television Networkand its companion system,CTV 2;Citytv;and theGlobal Television Network), and the three French language networks (Ici Radio-Canada Télé,V,andTVA) – are carried nationally by one or both of the country's satellite providers,Bell Satellite TVandShaw Direct,and any of these stations can be carried by any Canadian cable provider at minimum on adigital cableprogramming tier. The closest Canadian equivalents to the "superstation" model are thetelevision system,to some extent (basically acting as a smaller, less-centralized form of the network model), and, moreso, the independent station (the number of which had grown to some extent with the 2009 demise ofE!—a sister system to Global that was originally known as CH from its founding in 2001 until 2007—although some have become affiliates of other networks and systems).

Beginning in the late 1980s, Canadian Satellite Communications (Cancom, nowShaw Broadcast Services) began distributing the signals of independentsCHAN-TV(channel 8, now a Global owned-and-operated station) inVancouver, British Columbia,CITV-TV(channel 13, now a Global owned-and-operated station) inEdmonton, Alberta,andCHCH-TV(channel 11) inHamilton, Ontario,primarily for distribution by cable systems in smaller markets throughout Canada. Coincidentally, these stations were, like Cancom, either owned or later acquired byWestern International Communications(WIC). As a result of their early availability, which predated the existence of most Canadianspecialty channels,these stations – the former two of which are now owned byCorus Entertainmentand the latter byChannel Zero– continue to maintain a superstation-type status on analog cable in many smaller Canadian communities as well as on border-area cable systems in the United States (such asBuffaloNiagara Falls, New York,Burlington, Vermont,andBellingham, Washington).

Presently, both the aforementioned CHCH andCJON-DT(channel 21) inSt. John's, Newfoundland and Labradoruse slogans referring to each as a "superstation", though neither station has any special regulatory status at present conferring that title. Neither CHCH nor CJON holds a formal network affiliation, although the latter (which identifies under the "NTV" brand) carriesnewsand entertainment programming from Global andnews programmingfrom CTV, and both stations carry programming from the country's only syndicator, the religious and secular family serviceyes TV.(CJON and CHCH are both notable for streaming their programming feeds to viewers in a superstation-type manner within and outside of Canada through their websites; yes TV and CBC Television also maintain free online live streams but restrict access to viewers with CanadianIP addresses.In both cases, only a limited amount of non-local programming is carried on the online feed.)

Moreover, multichannel television providers within Canada are able to distribute American television stations in their digital package, regardless of whether they are superstations or affiliates of the five major U.S. broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox or The CW) that are authorized by theCanadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission(CRTC), which maintains a list of foreign television channels approved for distribution by the agency. The CRTC authorizesfive of the six designated American superstations(sans WAPA America) for carriage on domesticmultichannel television providers.Under CRTC rules first implemented on October 26, 1983, to bolster domestic programming services (particularly both independently-owned andspecialty services) by requiring providers to "link" U.S.-based services indiscretionary tierstied to Canadian services, all authorized American superstations typically are received mainly through a subscription to one or more domestic premium channels (such asCrave,Starz,Super Channeland/orSuper Écran,and previously the now-defunct servicesMovie CentralandEncore Avenue). Superstations included in Section "B" of the CRTC's Part II eligible services list are mandated to be packaged with premium services; however, under a related rule that allows for one superstation of the provider's choice to be carried on a non-premium tier, some television providers have chosen to offer either TBS/WPCH-TV, WGN-TV or WSBK in a specialty tier.[166][167]

On April 4, 1985, the CRTC granted authorization for WTBS, WGN-TV, WPIX and WOR-TV to be distributed to cable providers within Canada under Section "B" of the Part II eligible services list. Three other superstations were given clearance by the CRTC under the Part II Section "B" list during the 1990s: WSBK-TV was granted authorization on April 29, 1991 (per a request by First Choice Canadian Communications Corporation, then-owner of premium service First Choice [now Crave]), KTLA was granted authorization on July 17, 1991, and KWGN was granted authorization on July 22, 1997. KTLA and KWGN were each placed under the Part III non-Canadian services list simultaneous with their placement on the Part II list. (As of 2019,KWGN-TV is the only one of the seven CRTC-approved superstations that has no cable or satellite availability within Canada.)[168][169][170][171]

TBS was removed from the Canadian market when it became a cable-exclusive channel in the U.S. in October 2007, as the CRTC had only given approval for its former parent Atlanta broadcast signal to be carried by cable, satellite and other multichannel television providers within the country; for this reason, Canadian viewers instead receive the rechristened WPCH-TV. (WPCH is one of only two superstations eligible under the Commission's foreign distribution list, along with WGN-TV as a result of its programming separation from its WGN America companion service in December 2014, that is no longer distributed in the United States as a regional or national superstation.)[172][173]Similarly, on January 17, 2007, common carrier firm Shaw Broadcast Services ceased distribution of the WGN national feed in favor of offering the station's Chicago signal, a decision believed to have resulted from increased licensing fees for the then-superstation feed. (Some providers, includingMTS TVandCogeco Cable,continued to carry the superstation feed afterward in place of or in conjunction with the Chicago signal.)

Mexico

edit

Much as is the case in Canada, almost all of the commercial and non-commercial television stations in Mexico are available on satellite to be carried on cable and other direct-to-home (DTH) television providers within the country. However, no station had equal transmission nationwide: certain laws, such as the electoral law, forbid television stations from broadcasting advertisements (particularly, political campaign ads) originating from other states or regions within the country.[174]The country's telecommunications agency, theFederal Telecommunications Institute(IFT), also mandates that direct-broadcast satellite providers carry the signals of stations that are part of television networks that cover 50% of the Mexican territory, albeit with regional lockouts for advertisements.[175]

Radio superstations

edit

The first radio station in North America to achieve superstation distribution via satellite was Chicago'sWFMT(98.7 FM), a classical music station that was uplinked by United Video to the Satcom I satellite in May 1979, which began distributing its signal via satellite as acable radiofeed throughout the United States and was also distributed in over two dozen countries overseas (including theSoviet Unionand China). Like with fellow United Video-distributed superstation WGN-TV in that same market during its early years as a cable superstation, other than some limited revenue from a scant number of national advertisers, WFMT earned no extra revenue from its expanded distribution. (Incidentally, WFMT was co-owned with WGN-TV from 1968 until 1970, when WGN Continental Broadcasting donated the WFMT assets to the Chicagoland Educational Television Association, owner of local PBS stationWTTW[channel 11].)[176][177]WSM(650 AM) inNashville,Tennessee,also received a lot of attention in the 1980s through its distribution via C-band alongsideThe Nashville Network(which was co-owned with WSM radio at the time through Gaylord Entertainment). Very few stations actually distribute themselves through C-band, as the station's audio can now more easily be dialed in through eitherISDNlines, or listened to via anaudio streamover the internet (if the station offers such a service). Radio stations that relay their audio feed via C-band, likeWEEI-FM(93.7) inBoston,often do so to feed the signal to others thatsimulcastthe programming throughout theNew Englandregion. This is the case with several stations in Mexico, as radio and television broadcasting in that country is very nationalized and most local stations merely act as 24-hour-a-day affiliates of a national network.

Some local radio stations are, or have been distributed onsatellite radiothroughout the United States, and Canada in select cases. Stations that have previously maintained distribution over satellite radio have includedWLTW(106.7 FM) in New York City,KHMX(96.5 FM) in Houston,KIIS-FM(102.7) in Los Angeles,KNEW(960 AM) in San Francisco,WTKS-FM(104.1) inOrlando,WLW(700 AM) inCincinnatiandWSIX-FM(97.9 FM) in Nashville onXM Satellite Radio,and WSM onSirius Satellite Radio.XM, in particular, used radio-based superstations owned by Clear Channel Communications (nowiHeartMedia) for much of its channel lineup during the early years of the provider's existence; the two Clear Channel radio superstations that remained on its lineup – WLW and WSIX – were dropped by XM Satellite Radio in March 2009. The signals of WSIX, KIIS and WLTW returned to the now-mergedSirius XMlineup in June 2011, along with two new additions,CHRstationWHTZ(100.3 FM) in New York City andurban contemporaryoutletWGCI-FM(107.5) in Chicago. All iHeartMedia stations have since been removed from Sirius XM as a byproduct of the launch and growth of co-owned streaming radio platformiHeartRadio;WGCI, WLTW, and WSIX were removed in 2013 after Clear Channel sold its stake in Sirius XM, WHTZ left the satellite service in June 2020 with a stream continuing on Sirius XM's online service, and KIIS was removed in June 2022, along with the Sirius XM-hosted WHTZ simulcast.[178][179][180]

Three other specialty format stations—WBBR(1130 AM) in New York City, theflagshipaffiliate of theBloomberg Radiobusiness news service;WCSP-FM(90.1) in Washington, D.C., the sole affiliate ofC-SPAN Radio;andKBYR-HD2(89.1 FM HD2) inProvo, Utah,part ofBrigham Young University's BYU Radio service—are currently distributed on satellite radio, the former two of which are in lieu of their parent services maintaining conventional full-time affiliations with other radio properties across the United States. Most of WBBR's programming is also syndicated terrestrially to other stations throughUnited Stations Radio Networks.(KPIG-FM[107.5] inSanta Cruz, Californiaended its terrestrial syndication deal withDial Globalin March 2010, becoming one of the few radio stations to place its audio stream behind apaywall;[181]this made WBBR the only terrestrial superstation on U.S. radio.) KDIS (1110 AM, nowKWVE) inPasadena, California(serving the Los Angeles market) converted to superstation status in 2014, a byproduct ofRadio Disney– for which it serves as the children's radio network's flagship outlet, and became its only analog terrestrial broadcaster as a result – refocusing its efforts primarily on mobile distribution after drawing down its remaining affiliates through both the sales or shutdowns of its owned-and-operated stations and the format conversions of terrestrial affiliates not owned byThe Walt Disney Company.(Radio Disney began to reinstate conventional terrestrial radio coverage in 2016 throughbrokered arrangementsoverHD Radiosubchannels, albeit with a drastically reduced affiliate base than it had up until the early 2010s.)

Prior toCBS Corporation's 2017 sale of its radio properties toEntercom,in 2011,CBS Radiobegan usingHD Radiotechnology to relay the signals of its major-market music-formatted stations to other markets around the country. For instance,KFRG(95.1 FM) inSan Bernardinois carried onKTWV-HD3(94.7 FM HD3) in Los Angeles, KSCF (103.7 FM, nowKSON) inSan Diegois heard onKAMP-HD2(97.1 FM HD2) in Los Angeles;WBZ-FM(98.5 FM) in Boston was heard onWTIC-HD3(96.5 FM HD3) inHartfordup until after Entercom sold WBZ-FM to theBeasley Broadcast Groupin November 2017;KROQ-FM(106.7) in Los Angeles was formerly heard on KEGY (97.3 FM, nowKWFN) in San Diego; and both WXRK-HD2 (92.3 FM HD2, nowWINS-FM), andWFAN(660 AM) in New York City are respectively simulcast on three affiliates –WOCL-HD3(105.9 FM HD3) in Orlando,WLLD-HD3(94.1 FM HD3) inTampa,andWEAT-HD3(107.9 FM HD3) inWest Palm Beach– in Florida.[182]

In many cases where radio stations distribute outside their home market, the local stations make some concessions, such as replacement of local advertisements with either national advertising or a bed ofproduction musicthat plays over commercial breaks. Also in the example of WFAN, that station's play-by-play coverage of the New York Mets andGiants,theNew Jersey Devilsand theBrooklyn Netsis not carried on the Florida HD Radio affiliates and replaced with alternate programming, as the station only has rights to transmit the game broadcasts in the New York metropolitan area.

List of superstations

edit

Current

edit
Current television superstations
Originatingcity of license/market Station Owner Affiliation Signed on Year of
superstation
attainment
Year
uplinked
Availability/Notes
Atlanta, Georgia WPCH-TV17 Gray Television The CW 1967 1971 1976
(operated as national superstation until 2007)
WPCH is available on most cable and satellite providers throughout Canada.
Boston, Massachusetts WSBK-TV38 CBS News and Stations
(Paramount Global)
Independent 1964 1974 1988 WSBK is available in the United States through select cable providers in theNew Englandregion of the United States (primarily withinMassachusettsand select systems in surrounding states) and theDish Networksuperstation tier and in Canada on most cable, IPTV and satellite providers.
Chicago, Illinois WGN-TV9 Nexstar Media Group Independent 1948 1966 1978
(operated as national superstation until 2014)
The Chicago broadcast feed of WGN-TV is currently available in Canada on most cable, IPTV and satellite providers (either in lieu of or alongside NewsNation), and inThe Bahamason REV TV. Until WGN-TV ceased carriage of sporting events from four of Chicago's six professional sports franchises at the conclusion of the2019 Major League Baseball season,both feeds included select Chicago Bulls basketball and all Chicago Blackhawks hockey games that could not air on the U.S.-based national feed due to NBA and NHL restrictions.
Denver, Colorado KWGN-TV2 Nexstar Media Group The CW (O&O) 1952 1965 1987 KWGN-TV is currently distributed through select cable providers in theRocky Mountainregion of the western United States, and throughout the remainder of the country on Dish Network's superstation tier.
San Juan, Puerto Rico WKAQ-TV2 Telemundo Station Group
(NBCUniversal)
Telemundo 1954 2001 2001 WKAQ (through its national Telemundo Puerto Rico feed) is available in the contiguous United States through Spanish-language programming tiers offered by select cable providers and the Dish Network and DirecTV satellite services.
Los Angeles, California KTLA5 Nexstar Media Group The CW (O&O) 1947 1972 1988 KTLA is currently distributed through select cable providers in theSouthwestern U.S.,on Dish Network and DirecTV in the U.S, on most Canadian cable and satellite providers, and on REV TV inThe Bahamas.
New York City WPIX11 Mission Broadcasting
(operated by Nexstar Media Group viaLMA)
The CW (O&O) 1948 1965 1984 WPIX is currently distributed through select cable providers in the Northeastern United States and across the country, on Dish Network in the U.S., on most Canadian cable and satellite providers, and on REV TV inThe Bahamas.It was previously available to cable systems in upstate New York (including theAlbany,Binghamton,Utica,andPlattsburghmarkets) prior to the September 1998 launch ofThe WB 100+ Station Group,which ended WPIX's status as a default WB affiliate for those markets.
San Juan, Puerto Rico WAPA-TV4 Hemisphere Media Group
(InterMedia Partners[73%];
Azteca Acquisition Corporation [27%])
Independent 1954 2004 2004 WAPA (through its national WAPA America feed) is available in the contiguous United States through Spanish-language programming tiers offered by select cable providers and the Dish Network and DirecTV satellite services.
Secaucus, New Jersey
(New York City)
WWOR-TV9 Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
MyNetworkTV 1949 1965 1979 The local feed of WWOR—featuring all programming seen in the New York City area, with any blackouts determined by local syndication exclusivity and network duplication claims, is currently distributed in the United States through Dish Network's superstation tier, in Canada on most cable, IPTV and satellite providers, and inThe Bahamason REV TV.
Current radio superstations
Originating city of license/market Station Frequency Owner Format Signed on Year of
superstation
attainment
Availability
(delivery systems)
New York City WBBR 1130 AM Bloomberg L.P. Financial news
(Bloomberg Radio)
1954 2001 Satellite radio(viaSirius XM Satellite Radio);
Contentsyndicatedunder leasing arrangements to local radio stations in Washington, D.C. (WDCH-FM), San Francisco (KNEW) andBoston(WRCA)
Provo, Utah
(Salt Lake City)
BYU Radio KBYU
89.1 FM-HD2
Brigham Young University BYU Radio 2002 2011 Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio);audio is also re-transmitted as asecond audio programof cable networkBYUTV,and in turn across Utah viaKBYU-TV
Washington, D.C. WCSP-FM 90.1 FM National Cable Satellite Corporation Public affairs
(C-SPAN Radio)
1960 1998 Satellite radio
(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)

Former

edit
Former television superstations
Originatingcity of license/market Station Current affiliation Current owner Signed on Years of
availability
Distribution
Cincinnati, Ohio WXIX-TV19 Fox Gray Television 1968 1971–1986 WXIX maintained regionalized cable distribution in most ofOhioandKentucky,along with a few areas of easternIndiana.The station began terminating its carriage agreements with cable systems outside of the Cincinnati region when it affiliated with Fox in October 1986.
Cleveland, Ohio WUAB43 The CW Gray Television 1968 1971–1995 WUAB maintained regionalized cable distribution in most ofOhio,West Virginia,Pennsylvania,Kentucky,andOntario.The station was dropped from most cable providers outside of Cleveland andErie, Pennsylvaniaand Ontario's Lake Erie shoreline region in the 1990s. (The station is still available on Spectrum systems in the suburbs of Erie, Pennsylvania.)
DallasFort Worth, Texas KTVT11 CBS(O&O) CBS News and Stations
(Paramount Global)
1955 1971–1995 KTVT maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most of theSouth Central United States(concentrated mainly in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas, with systems in some larger markets within that footprint dropping KTVT from their lineups upon the re-imposition of SyndEx in January 1990), with some scattered distribution inNebraskaandKansas.The station began terminating its carriage agreements with cable systems outside ofNorth Texasin the months preceding its assumption of the CBS affiliation from incoming Fox affiliateKDFWin July 1995.
KXTX-TV39 Telemundo(O&O) NBC Owned Television Stations
(NBCUniversal)
1973 1977–1986 KXTX maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most of theSouth Central United States(concentrated mainly in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas); it rolled back its regional distribution gradually between 1983 and 1986, due to effects from the January 1983 distant signal fee increase.
Denver, Colorado KDVR31 Fox Nexstar Media Group 1983 1983–2000 KDVR maintained regionalized cable distribution in portions of the Rocky Mountain region of the western United States. The station's carriage agreements, except in certain markets where an affiliate was not initially available, began to be terminated upon KDVR becoming a charter Fox affiliate in October 1986; the station remained the default Fox affiliate for most of Colorado until 2000.
Detroit, Michigan WKBD-TV50 Independent CBS News and Stations
(Paramount Global)
1965 1968–2006 WKBD maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most of theMidwest.The station terminated its carriage agreements with cable systems outsideMichiganwhen it became a Fox affiliate in October 1986, but continued to remain available in some areas of Michigan through cable providers as the default Fox affiliate for the state until December 1994, whenCadillacaffiliateWFQX-TV(then known as WGKI) assumed the role. WKBD would serve as the default UPN affiliate for some areas of the state beginning in January 1995, and was finally removed from cable systems outside Detroit in September 2006 as stations around the state affiliated with its new network, The CW, via cable or digital subchannels; the station wound down its sports and news coverage in the early 2000s due toFox Sports Detroitclaiming all its former sports rights and the closure of its news department, respectively.
Houston, Texas KHTV39
(nowKIAH)
The CW (O&O) Nexstar Media Group 1967 1968–1990 KHTV maintained regionalized cable distribution across portions of the South Central United States before it gave up its superstation status in 1990.
Indianapolis, Indiana WTTV4 CBS Nexstar Media Group 1949 1971–1987 WTTV maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most ofIndiana,OhioandKentucky.Due to thesyndication exclusivityrule, it was dropped from most cable systems outside Indiana by 1987.
Kansas City, Missouri KSHB-TV41 NBC E. W. Scripps Company 1971 1976–1986 KSHB-TV maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most ofIowa,Nebraska,Kansas,andOklahoma;KSHB-TV lost its superstation status upon becoming a Fox affiliate in October 1986.
Los Angeles, California KTTV11 Fox (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1949 1965–1998 KTTV maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most of the Southwestern United States (concentrated in California,Arizona,New Mexico,NevadaandColorado); it lost its superstation status (except in areas where an affiliate was not initially available) when it became a charter Fox owned-and-operated station in October 1986.[46]The station continued to serve as the Fox affiliate of record for areas of southern California that did not have local affiliates of the network (in lieu of using theFoxnetnational feed) until 1998.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin WVTV18 The CW Sinclair Broadcast Group 1959 1972–1997 WVTV maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout most of Wisconsin,Minnesota,North Dakota,andSouth Dakota;the station's statewide coverage faded out over a period of five years upon becoming a WB affiliate in May 1997, as a result of its decision to not to renew existing carriage contracts.
MinneapolisSt. Paul, Minnesota KMSP-TV9 Fox (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1955 1979–2002 KMSP-TV (which served as the ABC affiliate for the Minneapolis–St. Paul market from its 1955 sign-on until the network shifted toKSTP-TVin October 1979) was distributed regionally on cable providers across much of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Wisconsin, taking over some of the channel slots previously occupied by WTCN prior to its switch to NBC. KMSP began terminating its carriage agreements with cable systems outside of Minnesota upon the start of its first tenure as a Fox affiliate in October 1986, though it retained sizeable distribution throughout much of Minnesota thereafter (even serving as a default UPN affiliate for theMankato,RochesterAustinMason CityandDuluthSuperiormarkets beginning in January 1995) until it became a Fox O&O in September 2002.
WTCN11
(nowKARE)
NBC Tegna, Inc. 1953 1968–1979 WTCN was distributed regionally on cable providers across much of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Wisconsin; all carriage agreements, except in certain markets where a local affiliate of the network was not available, were terminated upon WTCN's assumption of the NBC affiliation from KSTP-TV in October 1979.
KITN/WFTC29(nowWFTC9.2) MyNetworkTV (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1982 1984–1999 KITN (later recalled WFTC) maintained regionalized cable distribution across much of Minnesota; it served as the default Fox affiliate for the entire state from 1988 to 1999, when its carriage agreements were terminated.
New York City WNEW-TV/WNYW5 Fox (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1944 1965–1997 WNEW maintained regionalized cable distribution in portions of the Northeastern United States. Its carriage agreements, except in certain markets where an affiliate was not initially available, began to be terminated upon the station (re-called WNYW) becoming a charter Fox owned-and-operated station in October 1986. The station continued to be carried via cable in some areas of upstate New York (which was not served by Foxnet) until 1997.
Phoenix, Arizona KPHO-TV5 CBS Gray Television 1949 1971–1994 KPHO-TV maintained regionalized cable distribution throughout much ofArizonaandNew Mexico,as well as parts of California,Nevada,andUtah;KPHO lost its superstation status upon becoming a CBS affiliate in September 1994.
San Francisco, California KTVU2 Fox (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1958 1976–1999 KTVU was distributed as a national superstation in the early 1980s, primarily onCox Cablesystems, before reducing its cable coverage to providers in portions of California, Nevada,Oregon,and Utah. KTVU began terminating its carriage agreements with cable providers outside Northern California upon becoming a Fox affiliate in October 1986, and served as the default affiliate for areas of northwestern California that were not served by a local Fox affiliate until mid-1994. At that time, the station began serving as the West Coast Fox network feed onPrimestar,effectively regaining national availability for five years during the mid-to-late 1990s, until the satellite provider sold its assets (and effectively, transferred its subscriber base) toDirecTVin 1999.
Seattle, Washington KSTW11 Independent CBS News and Stations
(Paramount Global)
1953 1973–1995 KSTW maintained regionalized cable distribution across much ofWashington,northernIdahoand much of theCanadian provinceofBritish Columbia;KSTW lost its superstation status upon becoming a CBS affiliate (its third affiliation tenure with that network) in March 1995.
St. Louis, Missouri KPLR-TV11 The CW (O&O) Nexstar Media Group 1959 1973–1995 KPLR-TV maintained regionalized cable distribution across portions ofMissouri,Illinois,andArkansas.KPLR-TV began terminating its carriage agreements in 1989 due to thesyndication exclusivityrule; it lost its superstation status upon becoming an affiliate of The WB in January 1995.
TampaSt. Petersburg, Florida WTOG44 Independent CBS News and Stations
(Paramount Global)
1968 1974–1986 WTOG maintained intrastate cable distribution across portions of central and southwestern parts of Florida; it gave up its superstation status after becoming a Fox affiliate in October 1986.
Virginia Beach
NorfolkHampton, Virginia
WYAH-TV27
(nowWGNT)
The CW E. W. Scripps Company 1961 1972–1986 WYAH maintained regionalized cable distribution in most ofVirginiaand the eastern half ofNorth Carolina;the station's distribution outside of theHampton Roadsarea was rolled back throughout the mid-1980s, concluding around 1986.
Washington, D.C. WDCA20 MyNetworkTV (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1966 1969–1990 WDCA maintained regionalized cable distribution across portions of theEastern Seaboard;WDCA gave up its superstation status in the late 1980s.
WTTG5 Fox (O&O) Fox Television Stations
(Fox Corporation)
1947 1966–2006 WTTG maintained regionalized cable distribution across portions of the southern half of theEastern Seaboard.Its carriage agreements, except in certain markets where an affiliate was not initially available, began to be terminated upon the station becoming a charter Fox owned-and-operated station in October 1986; the station's carriage ended in all markets outside of Virginia and Maryland by 1990. WTTG continued to serve as the default Fox affiliate for the entire states of Maryland and Virginia until the fall of 2006.
Former radio superstations
Originating city of license/market Station Frequency Current owner Current format Signed on Years of
availability
Availability
(delivery systems)
Boston, Massachusetts WEEI 850 AM Entercom Sports radio
(ESPN Radio)
1929 1983–2014 C-band/cable radio
Chicago, Illinois WFMT 98.7 FM Window to the World Communications, Inc. Classical music 1948 1979–2004 Cable radio
WGCI-FM 107.5 FM iHeartMedia Urban contemporary 1958 2011–2013 Satellite radio
(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)
Cincinnati, Ohio WLW 700 AM iHeartMedia News/talk 1922 2002–2013 Satellite radio(viaXM Satellite Radio)
Cocoa Beach, Florida
(Orlando, Florida)
WTKS-FM 104.1 FM iHeartMedia Talk/Alternative rock 1962 2009–2013 Satellite radio(viaSirius Satellite Radio)
Freedom, California
(Greater San Francisco Bay)
KPIG 107.5 FM Stephens Media Group Freeform/Americana 1987 2007–2010 Syndication(viaDial Global)[183]
Houston, Texas KHMX 96.5 FM Entercom Hot AC 1948 2011–2017 Satellite radio(via Sirius Satellite Radio)
Los Angeles, California KIIS-FM 102.7 FM iHeartMedia Top 40 (CHR) 1948 2002–2007,
2011–2022
Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)
Nashville, Tennessee WSIX-FM 97.9 FM iHeartMedia Country 1948 2002–2007,
2011–2013
Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)
Nashville, Tennessee WSM 650 AM Ryman Hospitality Properties Country/Americana 1925 1981–2007 C-band satellite;
Satellite radio(via Sirius Satellite Radio)
Newark, New Jersey
(New York City)
WHTZ 100.3 FM iHeartMedia Contemporary hit radio 1961 2011–2020 Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)
New York City WLTW 106.7 FM iHeartMedia Lite AC 1961 2002–2007,
2011–2013
Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)
Oakland, California
(San Francisco, California)
KNEW 960 AM iHeartMedia Financial news
(Bloomberg Radio)
1925 2001–2013 Satellite radio(via Sirius Satellite Radio)
Pasadena, California
(Los Angeles)
KRDC 1110 AM ABC, Inc.
(The Walt Disney Company)
Sports radio
(ESPN Radio)
1954 2014–2017 Satellite radio(via Sirius XM Satellite Radio)

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^"§119. Limitations on exclusive rights: Secondary transmissions of distant television programming by satellite".U.S. Government Publishing Office.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  2. ^Megan Mullen."Superstation".Museum of Broadcast Communications.Archived fromthe originalon February 3, 2014.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  3. ^"Code of Federal Regulations 47 CFR 76.120".U.S. Government Publishing Office.October 1, 2017.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  4. ^"NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING: Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999".Federal Communications Commission. January 7, 2000.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  5. ^"Affiliate superstations on the way".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 8, 1986. p. 52.
  6. ^"Distant Signals".Museum of Broadcast Communications.Archived fromthe originalon February 3, 2014.RetrievedApril 30,2019.
  7. ^"For the Record".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 15, 1965. p. 100.
  8. ^"Broadcasters eye satellite feed to distant cables".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 1, 1975. p. 47.
  9. ^FCC Internet Services Staff."Communications History – Home Box Office".Federal Communications Commission. Archived fromthe originalon February 2, 2007.RetrievedOctober 5,2012.
  10. ^"Turner cranks up for satellite feed".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. March 22, 1976. p. 118.
  11. ^abChristian Williams (February 11, 1979)."Super Station's Super Man".The Washington Post.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  12. ^ab"Atlanta TV goes national via satellite".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 20, 1976. pp. 24–25.
  13. ^abcdef"Superstation breakthrough".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 30, 1978. pp. 25–26.
  14. ^abc"WGN-TV, KTVU may be the next super stations".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 9, 1978. p. 30.
  15. ^"SSS tangles with RCA over transponder for WGN-TV".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. November 6, 1978. p. 30.
  16. ^"Cable Briefs: Ready customers".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 18, 1978. p. 76.
  17. ^"Up in the air in more ways than one".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. December 18, 1978. p. 60.
  18. ^"Holiday network".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. April 16, 1979. p. 7.
  19. ^"In Sync: Superstations".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. March 25, 1979. p. 110.
  20. ^Jeremy Gerard (September 16, 1989)."A Channel Innovates and Moves Up".The New York Times.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  21. ^Steve Knoll (March 4, 1984)."WPIX to Join 'Superstations'".The New York Times.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  22. ^"Another station aloft".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. April 30, 1984. p. 10.
  23. ^"Changing birds".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 24, 1988. p. 49.
  24. ^"Cablecastings: Denver addition".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. October 26, 1987. p. 101.
  25. ^ab"Two more join superstation ranks".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. February 15, 1988. p. 60.
  26. ^"Satellite Footprints: United they stand".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. April 25, 1988. p. 63.
  27. ^"FCC grants five microwave protests".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 23, 1960. p. 85.
  28. ^"Microwave Denial Cites Economics".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 19, 1962. pp. 126–127.
  29. ^"FCC Upheld in CATV Case".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 27, 1963. p. 64.
  30. ^"High Court Backs FCC".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 23, 1963. p. 60.
  31. ^"At Deadline: WSTV Inc. challenges CATV use of signal".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. July 10, 1961. p. 9.
  32. ^"CBS files suit on CATV copyright clearance".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 14, 1964. p. 9.
  33. ^"Is CATVs future in FCC's hands?".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. June 24, 1968. pp. 19–22.
  34. ^"All signals, local or far, up for grabs by CATV's".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 8, 1972. pp. 19–20.
  35. ^"The FCC delivers on cable".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 7, 1972. pp. 17, 18, 40, 44.
  36. ^"In Brief".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. August 25, 1975. p. 30.
  37. ^"Cable gets boost with deletion of leapfrogging rule".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 22, 1975. p. 23.
  38. ^"Copyright is out of Congress".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 4, 1976. pp. 24–25.
  39. ^"Title 37: Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights: PART 256—ADJUSTMENT OF ROYALTY FEE FOR CABLE COMPULSORY LICENSE".United States Copyright Office.Archived fromthe originalon May 27, 2014.RetrievedJanuary 11,2015.
  40. ^"Rate Adjustment for Satellite Carrier Compulsory License"(PDF).United States Copyright Office.RetrievedJanuary 11,2015.
  41. ^ab"Congress, in overtime, passes TVRO, children's ad bills".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 24, 1988. pp. 26–28.
  42. ^"MPAA out to stop WTCG-type spread via cable, satellite".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. August 29, 1977. p. 20.
  43. ^"Battle lines form as expected on petition against super stations".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. October 24, 1977. p. 40.
  44. ^"Spreading the product".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. April 25, 1988. p. 63.
  45. ^"Distant signals closer and closer".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. November 6, 1978. p. 24.
  46. ^abc"Metromedia and NAB hit the FCC panic button over superstations".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc.page=62-63. March 25, 1979.
  47. ^"Battle rages at FCC over reluctant superstation".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. July 23, 1979. pp. 28, 33, 44, 45.
  48. ^"FCC now all but out of cable business".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. July 28, 1980. pp. 25–27.
  49. ^"Washington Watch: Naturally".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. August 25, 1980. p. 104.
  50. ^"NAB seeks FCC stay of repeal of last big cable rules".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. September 29, 1980. p. 46.
  51. ^"NAB request for stay in cable case denied by FCC".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 27, 1980. p. 46.
  52. ^"Appeals court upholds FCC repeal of distant-signal, exclusivity rules".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. November 24, 1980. p. 29.
  53. ^"Distant signal rule goes into effect as NAB heads for Supreme Court".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. July 6, 1981. p. 42.
  54. ^"Cable: It can't lose for winning".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. January 18, 1982. pp. 27–29.
  55. ^ab"Interpreting the copyright act".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 4, 1981. p. 57.
  56. ^"Sticky issue in WGN-United Video case".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. September 7, 1981. p. 89.
  57. ^"In Brief".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 12, 1981. p. 312.
  58. ^"Appeals court offers protection to WGN-TV's teletext signal".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. August 16, 1982. pp. 29–30.
  59. ^"Washington Watch: Copyright request".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. September 21, 1981. p. 58.
  60. ^"Washington Watch: NAB backs MPAA".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 12, 1981. p. 74.
  61. ^"Cable industry mounting counterattack on CRT".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. November 22, 1982. pp. 24–25.
  62. ^"Black Tuesday descends on cable industry".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. March 21, 1983. pp. 61–62.
  63. ^Sally Bedell (March 19, 1983)."How Copyright Fees Affect Cable TV".The New York Times.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  64. ^"Closed Circuit: False alarm?".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 2, 1983. p. 7.
  65. ^"Syndex redux: FCC levels the playing field".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. May 23, 1988. pp. 31–33.
  66. ^Charles Storch (May 19, 1988)."FCC Reimposes Rule On TV Exclusivity".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  67. ^"FCC Reinstates Exclusive Rights".Los Angeles Times.Reuters.May 18, 1988.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  68. ^Louise Sweeney (May 26, 1988)."Same reruns on too many channels? FCC says no more. Panel's ruling considered defeat for cable operators".Christian Science Monitor.Christian Science Publishing Society.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  69. ^Norman Chad (May 28, 1988)."'SyndEx' Spells Confusion Over Future Programming ".The Washington Post.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  70. ^"Making WTBS 'blackout-free'".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. July 31, 1989. pp. 40–41.
  71. ^"United Video and WGN-TV to keep station syndex-proof".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 6, 1989. p. 31.
  72. ^"Operators Get Avails on WWOR".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. August 19, 1991. pp. 39–40.
  73. ^Joseph Pryweller (November 25, 1989)."Local Stations Undergo Format Switch".Daily Press/The Times-Herald.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  74. ^"Returns coming in after week one of syndex".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. January 9, 1990. p. 137.
  75. ^Andy Grossman (June 25, 1990). "Cherrypicked Answer To Baseball Blackout".Channels.C.C. Publishing LP (Act III Publishing).
  76. ^Dan O'Kane (December 15, 1989)."That Dreaded Syndex Clause Guns Down Mavs, Rangers".Tulsa World.World Publishing Company.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  77. ^"WGN gains 2.2M subs; program appeal cited".Multichannel News.Fairchild Publications.July 16, 1990. Archived fromthe originalon September 24, 2015.RetrievedJanuary 18,2015.
  78. ^R. Thomas Umstead (January 13, 1992)."Midwest systems switch out WWOR; cable television operators sign up WGN".Multichannel News.Fairchild Publications. Archived fromthe originalon November 5, 2012.RetrievedJanuary 18,2015– via HighBeam Research.
  79. ^"Network-SBN litigation all but settled by superstation bill".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. October 30, 1988. p. 56.
  80. ^"FCC Says No to Home Dish SyndEx".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. January 28, 1991. p. 56.
  81. ^"Commission Implements Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act Sports Blackout and Program Exclusivity Rule Provisions for Satellite Carriers".Federal Communications Commission. November 2, 2000.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  82. ^Bill McConnell (November 6, 2000)."Local TV gets shield from DBS".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 8.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  83. ^"FCC's Rules Cut TV Offerings of 2 Satellite Firms".Los Angeles Times.Bloomberg News. November 3, 2000.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  84. ^"FCC Adopts Network Nonduplication, Syndicated Exclusivity and Sports Blackout Rules for Satellite Carriers".Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.November 9, 2000.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  85. ^Pamela McClintock (November 2, 2000)."FCC sets sat blackout rules; New law affects EchoStar, DirecTV programming".Variety.Cahners Business Information.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  86. ^"Congress Extends and Amends Compulsory Copyright License for Satellite Delivered Superstations and Distant Network Stations".Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.December 16, 2004.RetrievedMay 1,2019.
  87. ^"Baseball on Cable-TV Still Has Fuzzy Image".Los Angeles Times.United Press International. April 19, 1987.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  88. ^"FCC on course for adopting same-game rule for importation of distant sports".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. June 30, 1975. p. 30.
  89. ^"Same-game rule is out of bounds, say sports, broadcasters".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. September 1, 1975. p. 63.
  90. ^"For the Record".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. November 17, 1975. p. 73.
  91. ^"Judge's ruling in Eastern Microwave case muddies copyright waters".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. March 22, 1982. p. 73.
  92. ^"Court reverses Eastern Microwave".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. May 24, 1982. pp. 73–74.
  93. ^"Eastern Microwave cleared by Supreme Court".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. May 24, 1982. p. 73.
  94. ^"Turner and baseball come to terms".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. January 28, 1985. pp. 33–34.
  95. ^Russ White (April 7, 1985)."Ueberroth: Superstation are Hazardous to Baseball's Health".Orlando Sentinel.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  96. ^Skip Myslenski (January 29, 1985)."What's Good for Ted Turner May Not Be So Super for Us: WGN".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  97. ^Jerome Holtzman (June 21, 1992)."Vincent Tries a Little Tenderness".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  98. ^"Telecastings: Struck out".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. January 28, 1985. pp. 99–100.
  99. ^"In Brief".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 11, 1985. p. 96.
  100. ^Volney Meece (January 12, 1985)."Officials Feel Gaylord to Get OK on Rangers".The Oklahoman.Oklahoma Publishing Company.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  101. ^Jerry McConnell (February 9, 1985)."Ueberroth Approves Gaylord-Rangers Deal".The Oklahoman.Oklahoma Publishing Company.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  102. ^Jerry McConnell (July 5, 1986)."Rangers' New Owners Not Planning Changes".The Oklahoman.Oklahoma Publishing Company.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  103. ^"Rangers sale opens up question for Gaylord".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. September 5, 1988. pp. 51–52.
  104. ^"Cablecastings: Ranger report".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. April 10, 1989. p. 68.
  105. ^"Baseball Asks FCC for Local Exclusivity Against Superstations".Broadcasting.Cahners Business Information. September 10, 1990. p. 95.
  106. ^"In Brief".Broadcasting.Cahners Business Information. October 8, 1990. p. 97.
  107. ^"NCTA, Superstations Take Swing at Baseball's Exclusivity Protection Pitch".Broadcasting.Cahners Business Information. October 15, 1990. p. 83.
  108. ^"It's Root, Root, Root for the Out-of-Town Team".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. August 10, 1992. p. 24.
  109. ^"Vincent Blasts Superstations".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing. April 30, 1992.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  110. ^Steve Nidetz (August 28, 1992)."TV: Vincent's Two-Way Problem".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  111. ^Richard Sandomir (August 25, 1992)."TV SPORTS; Chicago (Not in Standings) Now in First".The New York Times.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  112. ^Steve McClellan (July 13, 1992). "Cubs Balk at Vincent Move".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 10.
  113. ^"Judge Backs Up Cubs in Dispute Against Baseball".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. July 27, 1992. p. 4.
  114. ^Jerome Holtzman (September 6, 1992)."Too Many Small-Market Owners Are Being Shortsighted".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  115. ^Jerome Holtzman (September 8, 1992)."Vincent Quits; May Be Last Baseball Czar".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  116. ^Joe Flint (September 14, 1992). "Vincent Departure Impacts MLB's Washington Agenda".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. p. 68.
  117. ^"N.B.A. Expansion Unlikely for 1986–87".The New York Times.June 27, 1985.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  118. ^"WGN-TV Takes NBA to Court Over Superstation Rule".Broadcasting.Cahners Business Information. November 5, 1990. p. 42.
  119. ^Richard Sandomir(April 16, 1991)."TV SPORTS; Bulls, Superstations And Power Moves".The New York Times.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  120. ^Steve Nidetz; John Gorman (October 27, 1990)."Bulls, WGN Sue NBA for Telecast Cut".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  121. ^abFranklin M. Fisher; Christopher Maxwell; Evan Sue Schouten (1999)."The Economics of Sports Leagues – The Chicago Bulls Case".Marquette Sports Law Review.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  122. ^James Warren (January 27, 1991)."'Geraldo' Goes to Moscow ".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  123. ^Richard Sandomir (January 7, 1995)."PRO BASKETBALL; N.B.A. TV Limits Ruled Illegal".The New York Times.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  124. ^James Warren (April 15, 1992)."Bulls, WGN Big Winners in Court".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  125. ^Rich Brown (November 9, 1992). "High Court Rules for WGN in NBA Case".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 54.
  126. ^James Warren (February 21, 1992)."Bulls Get OK for 30 WGN Games in '92–93".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  127. ^Matt O'Connor (January 7, 1995)."Bulls Get More WGN Telecasts".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  128. ^Matt O'Connor (September 11, 1996)."Appeals Court Reverses Call on Bulls Telecasts".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  129. ^"WGN to Televise 35 Bulls Games—To Local Audience Only".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing. October 15, 1996.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  130. ^"No Bulls; Cable TV can't carry Chicago games".Post-Bulletin.Post-Bulletin Company, LLC. October 19, 1996. Archived fromthe originalon April 1, 2019.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  131. ^"WGN-TV/NBA headed back to court in 6-year-old case".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. October 21, 1996.
  132. ^Jim McConville (December 9, 1996). "TCI move not so super for superstations".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. pp. 92, 94.
  133. ^Richard Katz (December 2, 1996)."Networks on chopping block; TCI makes mincemeat of programmers' lineups".Multichannel News.Cahners Business Information. Archived fromthe originalon November 5, 2012.RetrievedFebruary 24,2011– via HighBeam Research.
  134. ^"WGN-TV gets Christmas present".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. December 30, 1996. p. 34.
  135. ^Linda Moss (March 29, 1998)."WGN Looks to Soar After Difficult Period".Multichannel News.Cahners Business Information.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  136. ^Michael Hirsley (December 13, 1996)."Bulls Return to National Picture".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  137. ^Brien C. Bell."The Bulls Storm the Court(room): Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership v. The National Basketball Association"(PDF).UC Berkeley School of Law.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  138. ^Paul Farhi (September 11, 1988). "TV Sports Coverage Vaults to Profitability; NBC Wins Its Gold Before".The Washington Post.p. h.01.
  139. ^John M. Higgins(March 19, 2001). "WCW on the ropes".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 8.
  140. ^Jim Rutenberg (January 11, 2001)."Turner to Drop Wrestling, Shed Jobs".The New York Times.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  141. ^"Turner buys NCAA cable rights for $17.6 million".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications, Inc. February 1, 1982. p. 34.
  142. ^"Turner Cable TV Gets N.C.A.A. Football Pact".The New York Times.January 28, 1982.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  143. ^Joe Flint (December 6, 1993). "WB network signs WGN-TV".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information.p. 14.
  144. ^J. Linn Allen (December 4, 1993)."WGN Affiliation for New Network".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedApril 30,2019.
  145. ^Greg Burns (November 3, 1993)."Tribune's Network Tie Could Bench Its Sports".Chicago Sun-Times.Adler & Shaykin. Archived fromthe originalon March 28, 2015.RetrievedJuly 20,2013– via HighBeam Research.
  146. ^Steve Coe (August 21, 1995). "Tribune buys into Warner Bros. Network".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 14.
  147. ^Michael Stroud (February 1, 1999). "WB affils cheer end of WGN feed".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 29.
  148. ^Linda Moss (September 20, 1999)."WGN Drops WB, Adds Movies, Sitcoms".Multichannel News.Cahners Business Information. Archived fromthe originalon March 28, 2015.RetrievedJune 22,2013– via HighBeam Research.
  149. ^Steve McClellan (September 19, 1994). "Salhany's back and U/P's got her".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. p. 18.
  150. ^Bill Keveney (January 9, 1995)."Two Networks Not So Easy to Find Locally".Hartford Courant.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedApril 30,2019.
  151. ^John Dempsey (December 30, 1996)."Animal Eats WWOR".Variety.Cahners Business Information.RetrievedApril 30,2019.
  152. ^Jim McConville (January 6, 1997)."N.Y.'s WWOR loses super status; satellite distributor discontinues service contract with television station".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. Archived fromthe originalon November 5, 2012.RetrievedFebruary 24,2011– via HighBeam Research.
  153. ^Charles Paikert (January 6, 1997)."Discovery dogs WWOR; Animal Planet gets leg up on Open Slots".Multichannel News.Cahners Business Information. Archived fromthe originalon November 5, 2012.RetrievedFebruary 24,2011– via HighBeam Research.
  154. ^Steve McClellan (April 21, 1997). "TBS to go basic, Braves or no".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. p. 11.
  155. ^Donna Petrozzello (December 8, 1997). "Counting down to the new TBS".Broadcasting & Cable.Cahners Business Information. pp. 100–101.
  156. ^"WTBS to become Peachtree TV".Atlanta Business Chronicle.American City Business Journals.June 27, 2007.RetrievedJanuary 11,2008.
  157. ^"Turner Pressroom".Turner Broadcasting System(Press release). Archived fromthe originalon October 12, 2007.
  158. ^Robert Feder (February 5, 2014)."WGN news loses national platform".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedFebruary 7,2014.
  159. ^Lynne Marek (May 30, 2014)."WGN America to drop Chicago sports".Crain's Chicago Business.Crain Communications.RetrievedJune 27,2014.
  160. ^Robert Feder(December 15, 2014)."WGN America comes home to Chicago".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedJanuary 11,2015.
  161. ^Kent Gibbons (December 16, 2014)."WGN America Converts to Cable in Five Markets".Broadcasting & Cable.NewBay Media.RetrievedJanuary 11,2015.
  162. ^Jeff Baumgartner (January 6, 2015)."CES: Channel Master DVR to Pipe in Linear OTT".Broadcasting & Cable.NewBay Media.RetrievedSeptember 9,2015.
  163. ^"WAPA-America Debuts on DIRECTV PARA TODOS Programming Service".DirecTV, Inc.(Press release). The DirecTV Group Inc. August 23, 2004.RetrievedApril 30,2019– viaBusiness Wire.
  164. ^"Leading Puerto Rican Channel, WAPA America, Launches on DISH Network".WAPA America(Press release). September 9, 2011.RetrievedApril 30,2019– via Business Wire.
  165. ^"Dish to stop superstation subscriptions".Free TV Blog.September 10, 2013.RetrievedApril 30,2019.
  166. ^"ARCHIVED – Public Notice CRTC 84-81".Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.April 2, 1984.RetrievedApril 1,2019.
  167. ^"Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-312"(PDF).Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.May 27, 2010. p. 3.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  168. ^"Public Notice CRTC 1985-72 – Optional Canadian and Non-Canadian Satellite Services".Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.April 4, 1985.RetrievedApril 1,2019.
  169. ^"ARCHIVED – Public Notice CRTC 1991-46"(PDF).Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.April 29, 1991. p. 3.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  170. ^"ARCHIVED – Public Notice CRTC 1991-72".Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.July 17, 1991.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  171. ^"ARCHIVED – Public Notice CRTC 1997-96".Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.July 22, 1997.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  172. ^"Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2007-132 – Renaming of WTBS Atlanta as WPCH-TV Atlanta on the lists of eligible satellite services".Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.November 19, 2007.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  173. ^William Houston (October 4, 2007)."TBS throws a curveball to Canadian baseball fans".The Globe and Mail.Bell Globemedia.RetrievedMay 6,2019.
  174. ^Dra. Karolina Monika Gilas."Propaganda en Materia Electoral. Criterios Relevantes"(PDF).Federal Telecommunications Institute.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  175. ^"Retransmisiones de Señales Radiodifundidas".Federal Telecommunications Institute.Archived fromthe originalon March 11, 2019.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  176. ^"NCTA's cable programing pot pourri".Broadcasting.Broadcasting Publications Inc. May 28, 1979. p. 51.
  177. ^Eric Zorn (July 14, 1985)."The Little Station That Grew".Chicago Tribune.Tribune Publishing.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  178. ^"SiriusXM Adjusting Lineup: Z100/KIIS-FM Come To Sirius".RadioInsight.October 15, 2013.RetrievedJune 4,2022.
  179. ^"Z100 Leaves Satellites As Dave Matthews Band Radio Becomes Permanent On SiriusXM Lineup".RadioInsight.June 18, 2020.RetrievedJune 4,2022.
  180. ^"KIIS-FM To Depart SiriusXM".RadioInsight.May 26, 2022.RetrievedJune 4,2022.
  181. ^Jennifer Lane (March 17, 2010)."KPIG Asks Listeners To Pay For Streams".Audio4cast.com.Archived fromthe originalon June 17, 2020.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  182. ^Lance Venta (October 30, 2009)."CBS Taking Stations National via HD Radio".RadioInsight.RetrievedApril 29,2019.
  183. ^"Mediaweek".April 4, 2022.