Talk:Ålgård Line

Learn more about this page

This is thetalk pagefor discussing improvements to theÅlgård Linearticle.
This isnot a forumfor general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help.

Article policies

Find sources:Google(books·news·scholar·free images·WP refs)·FENS·JSTOR·TWL

Ålgård Linehas been listed as one of theEngineering and technology good articlesunder thegood article criteria.If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassessit.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Pagein the"Did you know?"column onApril 26, 2010.

The text of the entry was:Did you know... that when theÅlgård Lineopened in 1924, it was the laststate-owned railwayinNorwayto be built withnarrow gauge?

TrainsMid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 15, 2013

This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Trains,an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide torail transporton Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit theproject page,where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.See also:WikiProject Trains to do listand theTrains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated asMid-importanceon theproject's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Norway,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofNorwayon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment:14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review istranscludedfromTalk:Ålgård Line/GA1.The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:––Jezhotwells(talk)19:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against theGood Article criteria,following itsnominationfor Good Article status.

Disambiguations:two disambiguations fixed.diff

Linkrot:no dead links found.

Checking against GA criteria

GAreview(seeherefor criteria)

It isreasonably well written.
a(prose):b(MoS):
The prose is "reasonably well written", I made a small number of copy-edits.diffComplies sufficiently with the MoS
It isfactually accurateandverifiable.
a(references):b(citations toreliable sources):c(OR):
Online sources check out, Iassume good faithfor print sources.
It isbroad in its coverage.
a(major aspects):b(focused):
Thorough, whilst remaining focussed on the subject.
It follows theneutral point of viewpolicy.
Fair representation without bias:
It isstable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated byimages,where possible and appropriate.
a(images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales):b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):
Correctly tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! ––Jezhotwells(talk)20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian.Arsenikk ^(talk)20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Map?

Latest comment:14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you provide a map?Dr. Blofeld^{White cat}17:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic