Talk:Baggage handling system
This is thetalk pagefor discussing improvements to theBaggage handling systemarticle. This isnot a forumfor general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:Google(books·news·scholar·free images·WP refs)·FENS·JSTOR·TWL |
This article is ratedStart-classon Wikipedia'scontent assessmentscale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onBaggage handling system.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20100527221913/https://www.tsa.gov/research/checked_baggage_material.shtmtohttp://www.tsa.gov/research/checked_baggage_material.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)03:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
No internal photos?
editThese systems are apparently such complex, labyrinthine things (at least one Pixar feature depicts them, doesn't it?), it's a shame we don't have photos of any. It's like doing an article about some other fabulously complex thing without showing that either, isn't it? Sorry, this begs for a realsimile,but I'm fresh out. –AndyFielding(talk)23:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)