Talk:Brooklyn Museum
This article is ratedC-classon Wikipedia'scontent assessmentscale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article iswritten inAmerican English,which has its own spelling conventions (color,defense,traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English.According to therelevant style guide,this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
Possible Updated Exterior Picture of the Museum
editI have uploaded more current images of the museum onto Wikimedia Commons. If someone could update the wikipedia entry with the more current images it would be much appreciated. Thank you! ---Tracield(talk)— Precedingundatedcomment added15:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hkdk fueidkb dusklojskfs cjs@Gosgoodjkofkkhskhfjfskkkhdjsu202.69.43.6(talk)13:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
In the article, the Brooklyn Museum's exterior picture is from June 2005, I took two pictures of the exterior of the Brooklyn Museum as it stands February 2007. Should I go ahead and add the picture in the place of the previous picture? --PaladinHero101:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Why not? If it more accurate and/or better composed. Of the present picture, while it is decent, 'm not fond of most of the facade of the building being in shadow. Also, the camera was slightly tilted, which I find disquieting. (My humble opinion). —Gosgood14:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- rkhd dksibog d djgsccgdei. Esu202.69.43.6(talk)13:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
New York City Meetup
editNew York City Meetup
|
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of aWikimedia New York Citylocal chapter. It will also be a great opportunity to photograph some of the Brooklyn Museum's collection. Hope to see you there!--Pharos17:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
New York City Wikipedian Meetup November 16
editNew York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated tometa:Wikimedia New York Cityactivities,finalize and approve bylaws,interact with representatives from theSoftware Freedom Law Center,and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see theJune meeting's minutesand theSeptember meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recentWikis Take Manhattanevent, and make preparations for our exciting successorWikipedia ♥ Artbonanza, being planned with theBrooklyn Museumfor February.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list atWikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join ourmailing list.--Pharos(talk)21:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Loves Art
editPlease note this museum is participating in theWikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art(Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art/Brooklyn Museum rules). All interested editors are invited to participate in this project.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|talk18:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Digital Programs
editThe museum has a variety of interesting digital projects and programs, some involved with Wikipedia like Wikipedia Loves Art,WikiPopand their own online catalogue which encourages users to tag and organize the objects as they see fit. Additionally, they were one of the first American museums to release a free mobile iOS app (June 2010). I'd like to include this information under "Programs" rather than "populist directions" because iPhone Apps are becoming standard, and it seems as these museum accessibility programs are separate from curatorial decisions that could be labeled 'populist'. --Daedalus042(talk)20:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Wikipedia Loves Artmuseum photo weekend
editNew York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza
|
Join usthe evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 aroundWikipedia Loves Art!museum photography events at theMetropolitan Museum of Artand theBrooklyn Museum.
There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussingmeta:Wikimedia New York Cityissues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list atWikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join ourmailing list.--Pharos(talk)01:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Working with the Brooklyn Museum to improve this article
editFollowing on our previous cooperative efforts, we were contacted by the Brooklyn Museum about ways to improve the quality of this still shortish article, in ethical keeping with our guidelines (and as we did earlier with theJewish Museum). I suggested that they send us some background notes which would:
- let us know what clear inaccuracies or omissions there may be
- aid us in improving the overall quality of the article by pointing us to a few published sources that we can use to build up a good summary of the museum's work and history.
I've gotten a good response from them, and I will shortly start integrating some of the material pointed out in their background notes, and I hope other folks can help us to improve this further. We, the Wikipedians, will of course be the ones writing the actual neutral article.--Pharos(talk)02:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Arnold
editArnold Lehman is also known as Arnold L. Lehman.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by217.44.51.205(talk)13:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Size
editLooks like the information on the size of the Museum was incorrect saying we were the second largest art museum in the city.
Met = 2,000,000 square feet. MoMA = 630,000 square feet Brooklyn = 560,000 square feet
Our number of square feet is listed correctly, but we’re the third-largest (art museum) in physical size (not second-largest), so this correction was made to the page by museum staff.— Precedingunsignedcomment added byShelleyb7(talk•contribs)16:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onBrooklyn Museum.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20120914190110/http://carnegie.org/news/press-releases/story/news-action/single/view/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-announces-twenty-million-dollars-in-new-york-city-grants/tohttp://carnegie.org/news/press-releases/story/news-action/single/view/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-announces-twenty-million-dollars-in-new-york-city-grants/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)03:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Populism section
editThe sectionPopulism,while relatively balanced, is based almost entirely on a single newspaper article[1]that analyzes attendance patterns at the museum through subjective opinions, pro and con, regarding the museum's exhibition program. As such, the section mainly documents perspectives about the museum's management policies of that moment, rather than established consensus about its history, collections or audience. Lehman is no longer director of the museum.
The fact-based frame for the section--the decline in attendance during a period in time--is undermined by the museum's attendance subsequent to the date of article (e.g., 540,000 in 2014).[2]Museum attendance is inherently variable.
I suggest the section be deleted.
KR26740(talk)01:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^"Brooklyn Museum's Populism Hasn't Lured Crowds".New York Times.Retrieved20 September2017.
- ^"Nancy Spector Joins Brooklyn Museum as Chief Curator".New York Times.Retrieved20 September2017.
Red link New England Museum of Art
editwe have the linkNew England Museum of Art.Could someone figures out, same institution or not? If not, then notability?--Estopedist1(talk)12:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Asian art
editI added a section on Asian art to the article; the museum has a large collection. But I don't have time to add selections. There are a lot to choose from. I hope someone else can add a few. Thanks.Letita Bodicia(talk)15:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)