Talk:Minuet

Latest comment:6 years agoby InternetArchiveBot in topicExternal links modified (February 2018)

Adapted from 1911 enc.

edit

With an OCR error. 1/8 time would be stupid. Dictionary.com returns "A slow, stately pattern dance in 3/4 time for groups of couples, originating in 17th-century France."

the Oxford English Dictionary says "A slow, stately dance, in triple measure, for two dancers; derived from France in the latter part of the seventeenth century, and fashionable throughout the eighteenth." In other words, 3/4 since they didn't specify 3/8 or 3/16.

I thought that a minuet is in 6/8 time, but I haven't changed the entry in that regard.User:Wetman

You're part right - the most familiar type of minuet (at least in classical music) is in the French style - it's slow and sgo fuck a goat in 3/8 or sometimes 6/8 (you sometimes get these at the end ofItalian overtures). I'll tweak the article a bit to reflect this. --Camembert
(Afterthought) - actually, I've feeling I've seen minuets by Rameau in 6/8 as well (which means maybe Lully wrote them that way also), but I could be imagining it. --Camembert

I need help

edit

I need info on 'minuets' for my music project. does any one has any useful suggestions of what info i could use? Thanks! please help!

Help for music students

edit

Given that this article is under "musical forms," I'd like to see more information useful to students in music classes who have been assigned the homework of writing a minuet and are wrestling with the form. I.e., |I V||V I| structure, etc. Maybe once I figure out what I'm doing, I'll work on something like that.

Minuet, from Star Trek

edit

Once the Star Trek character has her own article, the paragraph in this article can be shortened to the bare minimum necessary for disambiguation.ShutterBugTrekker19:41, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Structure

edit

While sort of rewriting this article, I decided to give it a chronological structure, rather than separating history and form as it was before. I'm not sure if this was a wise choice, so comments are welcome, I guess.EldKatt(Talk)17:54, 16 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Removed reference to Nintendo 64 song

edit

Folks, I have again removed 24.242.31.37's reference to the Nintendo 64's song Minuet of the Forest. This tune was not even a minuet IIRC, was certainly not notable, and does not add any information to the article.Oscar01:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Original Four?

edit

Does anybody have a source other than this websitehttp://www.streetswing.com/histmain/z3minuet.htm

That

Originally there were only four Minuets,
  1. The Queen's Minuet or Le Minuet de la Reine,
  2. Le Minuet de Dauphin,
  3. Le Minuet d'Exaudet,
  4. Le Minuet de la Cour - (still popular today in certain circles).—Precedingunsignedcomment added byVonfraginoff(talkcontribs)10:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Inline citations

edit

User:Feline Hymnichas requested a discussion on this page of changes recently made to the inline citation style established for this article on 6 March 2009 inthis edit.The reason given for altering the established citation style is that several non-conforming citations had recently been added, and now outnumbered theparenthetical inline citationsalready in place. This is contrary toWikipedia:Citing sources,which states specifically: "If an article already has citations, adopt the method in use or seek consensus on the talk page before changing it." It says nothing about "votes" accumulated by subsequent non-conforming citations. It appears to me in addition that Feline Hymnic may be confusinginline citationswithfootnotes.Once again referring to "WP:Citing sources": "Two styles of inline citation are commonly used on Wikipedia:clickable footnotes(<ref> tags, as above) andparenthetical references.The latter would involve adding (Smith 2011, p. 1) in round brackets within the sentence, while the former would include the same citation in a footnote ". I submit that there is no justification for changing the established reference style, and my correction should therefore be restored.—Jerome Kohl(talk)18:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lully and the Trio

edit

Can cite the Grove article "Trio" for the Lully bit. 157.178.2.1(talk)18:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion, but I find no mention at all of the minuet (or of Lully's use of trio texture to alternate with the main section of dances) in theNew Grove/2 article "Trio" article by McClymonds, et al. Are you possibly referring to an earlier edition of Grove?—Jerome Kohl(talk)20:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Redirect and/or disambiguation please

edit

I apologise, I have not yet learnt how to set up redirect and disambiguation. Why is one needed? Many composers did not use the term minuet, in my present short digital library I have minuetto, menuet, menuette, menuetto. If I search wikipedia for these I will be directed to pages on J.S. Bach, &c., but not to the page that tells me about the classical music form known in English as minuet. If I was looking at one of the wiki-pages on Bach, and saw menuette and did not know what that was, I would not at present be able to find out through wikipedia. Redirection and disambiguation would be a good thingBrunswicknic(talk)11:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

To start with, let us be clear that "redirects" and "disambiguations"are more or less opposite categories. A disambiguation page lists two or more different senses for one and the same word.Setis a good example. What you are asking for are redirects, and I am a little puzzled that you mentionminuetto,menuet,andmenuetto,all three of which currently redirect to this article. "Menuette", on the other hand, is a much less-often encountered variant Fench spelling, and does not currently have a redirect. Perhaps it should. May I ask, in what way are you being redirected to "pages on J.S. Bach, &c."? When I type in any of these terms (except for the rare French variant), I am taken directly to this article. What happens in your case? In general, to learn about reditects and how to create them, seeWikipedia:Redirect.—Jerome Kohl(talk)23:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onMinuet.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)17:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply