The subject of this article iscontroversialand content may be indispute.When updating the article,be bold, but not reckless.Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.Content must be written from aneutral point of view.Includecitationswhen adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Q:Why doesn't the article cover more of Chomsky's view on X political event?
A:This article doesn't cover all of Chomsky's many political views, only the ones that have had significant secondary source discourse to factor into what ageneral readerwould need to know abouthis general biography.ThePolitical positions of Noam Chomskyarticle goes into more depth for those with specific interests.
Noam Chomskyis aformer featured article.Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Current status:Former featured article, current good article
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons(BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediatelyfrom the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous.If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Anarchism,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofanarchismon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Anti-war,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theanti-warmovement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Atheism,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofatheismon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or seeinfo box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members ofAtheismby checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generatingneologisms,so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (seedeletion process).
State atheismneeds a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography,a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the projectandcontribute to the discussion.For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Socialism,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocialismon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpoliticson Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Linguistics,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oflinguisticson Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Pennsylvania,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPennsylvaniaon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philadelphia,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPhiladelphiaon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article has beenautomatically ratedby abotor other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the|auto=parameter.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophyon Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussionabout philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Psychology,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPsychologyon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject University of Pennsylvania,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofUniversity of Pennsylvaniaon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
Define "rationalism" as parallel to definition of "empiricism"
Get a better source for Saudi Arabia political views; try McGilvray
Get a better source for views on partition of Palestine
Reduce hagiography in§ In politics:remove quotes, pare second paragraph, expand on Srebrenica massacre remarks, consider page number for Rabbani 2012, consider paring re: Horowitz, Kay, ADL, Dershowitz
Latest comment:2 months ago8 comments2 people in discussion
Among some other problems throughout his life, Noam was close with former financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Noam has claimed to have met with him several times after his original conviction and often gave extremely lame or bizarre responses to people on this topic such as "none of your business" or "he served his time" despite the severity of his crimes and the heinous nature.Cruetresin(talk)02:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
"Controversy" sections are often the result of poor writing, noxious and poorly representative; the current article does the much preferable thing of interspersing those details throughout the article where they actually belong, in proportion to how they are represented in sources about Chomsky perWP:NPOV.Remsense‥Luận02:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
We don't put emphasis on the Epstein connection because reliable sources don't. If the goal amounts to activism, then the intent is misplaced. I'm fairly sure this discussion has been had before, but if you want to pitch your case you can collate some sources here—I'm sure many are of relatively low quality (not dismissing the situation itself here, don't misunderstand) but generally these cases are decided based on what the best available sources have to say.Remsense‥Luận02:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I guess it would depend on what a reliable source is but regardless Chomsky himself has endorsed that he has met with him.
The other part of the equation here is one of proveable interest versus innuendo: it's simply not that interesting on an encyclopedia what friends someone has unless they, y'know, do something (more substantial than move money, I have to specify, even a lot of money)—even if the WSJ wrote about it, there's just not much for us to synthesize of encyclopedic interest from that. I get it's frustrating for people who smell smoke, as it were—it's irrelevant here, but I happen not to think much of the Epstein connection with Chomsky in particular—but we need sources saying there's a big fire if we don't want to go afoul of our policies aboutbiographies of living people.We can't just write suggestively about smoke, even if it's well-sourced.Remsense‥Luận03:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well first of all the mere relationship with the most infamous sex offender of all time years after his conviction and being listed on Epstein's calendar should be enough to warrant a mention. Secondly, he had been given money, financial advice, free trips (not to Little St. James) but flown around to various places to meet with Epstein, and many other things that should warrant at the very little a mention of it all while not denying it and keeping everything extremely vague on exactly what happened. Kinda insane to just call having a relationship with the most heinous person in the world in both criminality and lifestyle "just smoke".Cruetresin(talk)03:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I really do understand why you say all this, but I'll try to reiterate the position: we do not want to slander anyone or insinuate they did things they did not do. Generally, an encyclopedia article would not mention that X public figure moved $200,000 for Y public figure if there is not something more interesting involved there. We have nothing more material to say in that vein here, so if we include the $200,000 thing, we are in effect publishing innuendo implying Chomsky did awful things without actually saying that he did.Remsense‥Luận03:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital articleis ratedGA-classon Wikipedia'scontent assessmentscale.
Review all citations fortext–source integrity