Premature obituaries and criticism section

edit

The Telegraphwas founded 168 years ago in 1855. The "Premature obituaries" subsection in the "Criticism" section lists three examples inThe Telegraph's history of publishing premature obituaries. The only source for this is a 2001 article by a journalist inThe Telegraphitself. Is this really "criticism"? Many media outlets in many countries do occasionally print mistakes or occasionally publish premature obituaries, often due to a technical or human error. In my view the "Premature obituaries" subsection isWP:UNDUEin the criticism section, as apart from the journalist inThe Telegraphmentioning three mistakes made in different years, there is no other reference to stateThe Telegraphwas criticised for these errors.

In the subsection "Accusation of antisemitism" there is only one person,Owen JonesofThe Guardian,who has made the accusation of antisemitism againstThe Telegraphfor publishing articles which have espoused a Cultural Marxism / antisemitic conspiracy theory. Apart from an op-ed /Guardiancolumn from Jones, there is no other person listed in a reference who has accusedThe Telegraphof antisemitism. In my view, the "Accusation of antisemitism" subsection may also beWP:UNDUEgiven the absence of criticism regarding this from anybody in a reference apart from Owen Jones.

Guidelines atWP:CRITalso state: "In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints."Kind Tennis Fan(talk)01:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"デイリー・テレグラフ"listed atRedirects for discussion

edit

The redirectデイリー・テレグラフhas been listed atredirects for discussionto determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines.Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 9 § デイリー・テレグラフuntil a consensus is reached.Certes(talk)18:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply