Wikipedia

Ulmus glabra'Superba'

Thewych elmcultivarUlmus glabraHuds.'Superba',Blandford Elm,with unusually large leaves, was raised by Gill's ofBlandford Forum,Dorset, in the early 1840s asUlmus montana superbaand was quickly distributed to other UK nurseries.[1]It was confirmed as a form of wych, and first described byLindleyinThe Gardeners' Chronicle,1845,[2]later descriptions being added by Gill (1845)[1]andMorren(1848), who called itU. montanavar.superba.Morren had adopted the name 'Superba' from theFulhamnurseryman Osborne in 1844, who supplied him with the tree – presumably one of the nurseries supplied by Gill.[3]Morren states that 'Superba', already in cultivation in England, was introduced to Belgium by Denis Henrard of Saint Walburge,Liège,that in 1848 it had been present in Belgium for only three years,[3]and that this variety was the one described as 'Superba' by Osborne, whom Henrard had visited at his nursery in Fulham in September 1844.[4]'Blandford Elm', with leaves of the same dimensions, was soon for sale in the USA (see 'Cultivation').

Ulmus glabra'Superba'
'Superba', Mount Hope,Rochester, New York,c.1900
SpeciesUlmus glabra
Cultivar'Superba'
OriginEngland

TheSpäth nurseryinBerlinsupplied a large-leaved[5]U. montana superbafrom 1885[6]to the 1930s.[5][7]H. Jensen[note 1]examined the tree at Späth's nursery and confirmed (1912) that it was identical to Morren'sUlmus montana superba.[8]Späth's catalogue of 1911–12, however, had erroneously claimed that aU. praestansE. Schochwas synonymous with Morren'sU. montana superba.[9]Hartwig,who received specimens ofU. praestansfrom Kiessling of the Magdeburg city nursery in 1908, said (1912) that "Ulmus montana superba,supposedly the same [asU. praestans], looks quite different when young, being wide with large, broad, dull green leaves, whereas...U. praestansshow an elongated medium-sized shiny green leaf and densely pyramidal crown ". He concluded thatU. praestanswas notUlmus montana superba.[10]Späth admitted the error in an article in Möller'sDeutsche Gärtner-Zeitung(1912),[11]where he stated thatU. praestansE. Schochwas anUlmus×hollandicahybrid, and implied that Morren's tree was a form ofU. montana(wych elm). In later catalogues the nursery distinguished between Morren'sUlmus montana superbaand the hybridU. praestansE. Schoch(for which he adoptedHenry's synonymUlmus superbaHenry), marketing both cultivars in the post-war period.[7]

Späth was not the onlybotanistto confuse wych andhybrid'Superba'. ThoughLoudonin his description (1838) of Canterbury Elm,Ulmus montana glabra major,had made no reference to large leaves,[12][13]Boulger tentatively (1881)[14]andGreenmore confidently (1964)[15]equated Canterbury Elm with Morren'sU. montanavar.superba,a synonym not included inRehder's lists (1915 & 1949).[16][17]Loudon's description of Canterbury Elm, a fast-growing hybrid likeHuntingdon Elm,holding its leaves late, does, however, match descriptions ofU.×hollandica'Superba'[U. praestans].

Description

edit

Descriptions of 'Superba' cultivars vary, as do herbarium specimens, confirming that more than one clone has been given the name. Gill'sUlmus montana superbahad very large leaves, 10 in (25 cm) long by 6 in (15 cm) wide.[1]Osborne and Morren'sUlmus montanavar.superbalikewise had very large wych-like leaves, to 26 by 15 cm, with a tapering tip to 3–4 cm long.[4]The matching names, measurements and dates confirm that Gill's, and Osborne and Morren's, trees were the same clone. An 1880 herbarium specimen showing a large-leaved wych cultivar atKew Gardens,labelledU. montana superba,has dimensions similar to those given by Gill and Morren (juvenile elm leaves may be larger than those of mature canopy-leaves).[herb 1]TheUlmus'Superba', 'Blandford Elm', in the 1902 catalogue of the Bobbink and Atkins nursery,Rutherford, New Jersey,was described as "a noble tree of large size and quick growth", with "large dark green foliage and smooth, grayish bark" (presumably in young specimens).[18]

  • Leaf-drawing (1848) of Osborne and Morren's 'Superba', leaves to 26 × 15 cm.[3]

Etymology

edit

Morren states that 'Superba' was so called "parce qu'en effet cette variété l'emporte sur les autres par sa beauté" [:because indeed this variety surpasses others in beauty].[3]

Pests and diseases

edit

With the exception ofExeter Elmand dwarf wych,U. glabraHuds.cultivars are not noted for any resistance toDutch elm disease.

Cultivation

edit

An 1880Kew Gardensherbarium specimen, from one of the arboretum's own trees, labelledU. montanavar.Superbaand matching Lindley's description, confirms that Gill's tree was present at Kew (see 'External links'). Mid 20th-century herbarium specimens from the Wageningen Aboretum, The Netherlands, show a wych cultivar there "formerly labelledUlmus × hollandica'Superba' ".[herb 2][herb 3][herb 4]

Ulmus montana superba,'The superb-leaved elm', appeared in the catalogues of Hovey's nursery ofBoston,Massachusetts, from the 1850s.[19]'Blan[d]ford Elm (superba)', with "remarkably large leaves", appeared in the 1868 catalogue of the Mount Hope Nursery (also known asEllwangerandBarry) ofRochester, New York;[20][21]by the 1880 catalogue it was listed asU. montanavar.superba(Blandford Elm), "A noble tree of large size and quick growth; foliage large and dark green; bark smooth and grayish".[22]Under the same name and description it appeared in the catalogues of the Bobbink and Atkins nursery,Rutherford, New Jersey,[18][23]and in Kelsey's 1904 catalogue, New York.[24]The absence of Späth's names from the Bobbink and Atkins and the Kelsey lists and their use of 'Blandford Elm' suggest that the cultivar was Gill's clone.

A cultivar listed in 2008 asUlmus × hollandica'Blandford' by the Urban Forestry Administration of theDistrict Department of TransportationinWashington, D.C.,as one of its 'street trees', is likely to have been Blandford Elm misnamed as a hybrid, orhybrid 'Superba'misnamed 'Blandford'.[25]

Given Späth's pre-1912 naming error, it is not clear whether one planting ofU. montana superbaat theDominion Arboretum,Ottawa,Canada,in 1896, sourced from Späth,[26]was the wych or thehybrid 'Superba'.The specimen (no. 42304) maintained as part of a low hedge atWakehurst Place,Sussex (2020), grown from a cutting from Ottawa donated in 1949, is, however, listed as the hybrid 'Superba',[27]suggesting that 1896 Ottawa planting may likewise have been the hybrid.

Notable trees

edit

A large-leaved elm described asUlmus campestris'Superba' obtained fromLouis van Houtteof Ghent, Belgium, before 1841 was photographed at the Ellwanger and Barry nursery at Mount Hope,Rochester, New York,c. 1900.[28]The photograph is also captioned 'Belgium Elm', possibly a reference to its source rather than a confusion with the hybrid'Belgica'.[28]As the nursery later stocked the wych 'Superba', Blandford Elm, it is probable that propagation was from this tree.[20]Arnold Arboretumidentified it in 1915 as a varietal form ofUlmus glabraHuds.,which would match Blandford Elm, despite the apparent discrepancy in dates.[29]

Putative specimens in the UK

edit

An old example of what appears to be the same clone as the 1880 Kew large-leaved 'Superba' survives (2019) onLeith Links,Edinburgh. The Edinburgh tree has wychsamaraeand short petioles, with no evidence of hybridization.

  • Large-leafed wych cultivar, Leith Links, Edinburgh.
  • Foliage of same matching Kew's 1880 'Superba'
  • Close-up of leaves
  • Underside of long shoot
  • Bole
  • Same, autumn

Notes

edit
  1. ^Possibly Holger Jensen, after whom 'Holgeri' was named.

Herbarium Specimens

edit
  1. ^"Herbarium specimen - E00824742".Herbarium Catalogue.Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh.Sheet described asU. montanavar.superba(Kew Gardens specimen, 1880)
  2. ^"Herbarium specimen - WAG.1846734".Botany catalogues.Naturalis Biodiversity Center.Sheet labelledUlmus glabraHuds.,formerly called 'Superba'
  3. ^"Herbarium specimen - WAG.1846731".Botany catalogues.Naturalis Biodiversity Center.Sheet labelledUlmus glabraHuds.,formerly called 'Superba'
  4. ^"Herbarium specimen - WAG.1846732".Botany catalogues.Naturalis Biodiversity Center.Sheet labelledUlmus glabraHuds.,formerly called 'Superba' (with samarae)

References

edit
  1. ^abc"New and splendid ornamental elm - Ulmus montana superba".The Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette:670. 1845.
  2. ^Lindley, J., 'The Elm',The Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette,13 September 1845, p.628, col.3
  3. ^abcdMorren, Charles (1848)."Notice sur l'Orme des montagnes".Journal d'Agriculture Pratique de Belgique.1(1): 411–414.Retrieved2017-02-21.
  4. ^abHenrard, D. (1845). Morren, Charles (ed.)."Sur un voyage fait en Engleterre et en Écosse".Annales de la Société royale d'agriculture et de botanique de Gand.1:155–168.Retrieved2017-02-22.
  5. ^abKatalog(PDF).Vol. 108. Berlin, Germany: L. Späth Baumschulenweg. 1902–1903. pp. 132–133.
  6. ^Elwes, Henry John;Henry, Augustine(1913).The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland.Vol. 7. pp. 1873–1874.Republished 2004 Cambridge University Press,ISBN9781108069380
  7. ^abSpäth, Ludwig (1930).Späth-Buch, 1720-1930.Berlin: Self published. pp. 311–313, 351–352.
  8. ^Beissner, Ludwig (1912)."Ulmus praestans".Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft.21:227.
  9. ^Späth catalogue 1911/12, p.137
  10. ^Hartwig, Karl Gustav (1913)."Ulmus praestans".Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft.22:302.
  11. ^Spath, L (1912)."Ulmus praestans = U. montana superba".Möllers Deutsche Gärtner-Zeitung.27(15): 177.Retrieved17 October2017.
  12. ^Loudon, John Claudius (1838).Arboretum et fruticetum Britannicum.Vol. 3. p. 1404.
  13. ^Hanham, F. (1857).A Manual for the Park(Royal Victoria Park, Bath). Longman, London.
  14. ^Boulger, George Simonds (1881). McLaren, John (ed.)."On British Elms".Transactions of the Royal Scottish Arboricultural Society.9.Edinburgh: 39.Retrieved18 October2017.
  15. ^Green, Peter Shaw(1964)."Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus".Arnoldia.24(6–8).Arnold Arboretum,Harvard University:41–80.Retrieved16 February2017.
  16. ^Rehder, Alfred (1915)."Neue order kritische Gehölze".Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft.24:215–219.Retrieved18 October2017.
  17. ^Rehder, Alfred."Ulmaceae".Bibliography of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in the cooler temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere.Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts: The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. pp. 135–143.Retrieved18 October2017.
  18. ^abBobbink and Atkins, Rutherford. N.J.Rutherford, N.J.: Bobbink & Atkins. 1902. p. 51.
  19. ^Hovey & Co., Boston, Mass.,Catalogue of ornamental trees & shrubs, evergreens and climbing plants,1855, p.5
  20. ^abEllwanger & Barry,Descriptive Catalogue of Hardy Ornamental Trees... at the Mount Hope Nurseries(Rochester, N.Y., 1868), p.9
  21. ^Ellwanger & Barry,Descriptive Catalogue of Hardy Ornamental Trees... at the Mount Hope Nurseries(Rochester, N.Y., 1875)
  22. ^Ellwanger & Barry,Descriptive catalogue of hardy ornamental trees, shrubs, etc.(Rochester, NY, 1880), p.39
  23. ^Bobbink and Atkins, Rutherford. N.J.Rutherford, N.J.: Bobbink & Atkins. 1909. p. 51.
  24. ^General catalogue, 1904: choice hardy trees, shrubs, evergreens, roses, herbaceous plants, fruits, etc.New York: Frederick W. Kelsey. 1904. p. 18.
  25. ^"Urban Forestry Administration".District Department of Transportation.Archived fromthe originalon 16 July 2010.Retrieved20 June2016.
  26. ^Saunders, William; Macoun, William Tyrrell (1899).Catalogue of the trees and shrubs in the arboretum and botanic gardens at the central experimental farm(2 ed.). Ottawa. pp. 74–75.
  27. ^"ePIC - Detailed results from Living collection for ulmus".epic.kew.org.Retrieved2017-10-19.
  28. ^abMeeham, Joseph (1903)."Ulmus Campestris Superba".The Florists' Exchange.15:230.
  29. ^"European Elms"(PDF).Bulletin of Popular Information.1(14).Arnold Arboretum,Harvard University:56. 23 July 1915.Retrieved18 October2016.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ulmus_glabra_%27Superba%27&oldid=1167581606"