Urban structureis the arrangement ofland useinurban areas,in other words, how the land use of a city is set out.[1]Urban planners,economists,andgeographershave developed several models that explain where different types of people and businesses tend to exist within the urban setting. Urban structure can also refer tourban spatial structure,which concerns the arrangement ofpublicand private space in cities and the degree ofconnectivityand accessibility.
Zonal model
editThis model was the first to explain distribution of social groups within urban areas. Based on one single city,Chicago,it was created by sociologistErnest Burgess[2]in 1924. According to this model, acitygrows outward from a central point in a series ofconcentricrings. The innermost ring represents thecentral business district.It is surrounded by a second ring, the zone of transition, which contains industry and poorer-quality housing. The third ring contains housing for the working-class and is called the zone of independent workers' homes. The fourth ring has newer and larger houses usually occupied by themiddle-class.This ring is called the zone of better residences. The outermost ring is called thecommuter's zone. This zone represents people who choose to live in residentialsuburbsand take a daily commute into the CBD to work.
Sectoral model
editA second theory of urban structure was proposed in 1939 by an economist namedHomer Hoyt.[3]His model, the sector model, proposed that a city develops in sectors instead of rings. Certain areas of a city are more attractive for various activities, whether by chance or geographic and environmental reasons. As the city grows and these activities flourish and expand outward, they do so in a wedge and become a sector of the city. If a district is set up for high income housing, for example, any new development in that district will expand from the outer edge.
To some degree this theory is just a refinement on the concentric model rather than a radical restatement. Both Hoyt and Burgess claimedChicagosupported their model. Burgess claimed that Chicago's central business district was surrounded by a series of rings, broken only byLake Michigan.Hoyt argued that the best housing developed north from the central business district along Lake Michigan, while industry located along major rail lines and roads to the south, southwest, and northwest.
Calgary, Albertaalmost perfectly fits Hoyt's sector model.
Multiple nuclei model
editGeographersChauncy HarrisandEdward Ullmandeveloped the multiple nuclei model in 1945.[4]According to this model, a city contains more than one center around which activities revolve. Some activities are attracted to particular nodes while others try to avoid them. For example, a university node may attract well-educated residents, pizzerias, and bookstores, whereas an airport may attract hotels and warehouses. Other businesses may also form clusters, sometimes known locally asIron Trianglesfor automobile repair orred light districtsfor prostitution, orarts districts.Incompatible activities will avoid clustering in the same area, explaining why heavy industry and high-income housing rarely exist in the same neighbourhood.
References
edit- ^"BBC - Standard Grade Bitesize Geography - Urban structure and models: Revision".bbc.co.uk.2013-04-20. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-04-20.Retrieved2019-04-01.
- ^Burgess E.W. (1924) "The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project" Publications of the American Sociological Society, 18:85-97
- ^Hoyt H (1939): "The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities" Washington DC; Federal Housing Administration
- ^Harris C D and Ullman E L (1945), "The nature of cities" Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 242: 7-17