Optimismshould have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
Philosophy of social science,has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
Exchange valueneeds to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
Socratic dialoguescould do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
Problem of universals:The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
Teleology:the article is shallow and inconsistent.
Existentialism:the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
Analytic philosophyThis is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
LifeworldA philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
PerceptionNeeds the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.
I am currently a student at Durham University studying Single Honours Philosophy. I'm getting more comfortable with the Wikipedia editing system and shall hopefully be making some more major contributions soon, but until then I shall be participating in discussion and minor edits of various articles (usually Philosophy ones) to hopefully offer a bit of help that way.
