Asphyxiate.always

Wikipedia:Babel₅

en-5This user can contribute with aprofessionallevel ofEnglish.

es-2Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivelintermediodeespañol.

en-us
-NThis user is anative speakerofAmerican English.

1337/
IntS!This user understands leet, IM & texting slang, but won't use it. "411 ur LOL pwn ROFLMAO OMG b310ng 2"you,thanks.

BSThis user can speakBullshit.

LE-0This individual still maintains ashredof dignity in this insane world by adhering to correctspelling,grammar,punctuationandcapitalisation.

...This user would like to be able to speakmany more languages.

sar-NThis user is anativespeaker ofsarcasm.Isn't thatjust great?

This user usesWiktionaryas their primary dictionary.

Search user languages

location₃

This user lives in the U.S.State of Oregon.

This user's time zone isUTC-8.

This userbegrudginglyobservesDaylight Saving Time.

Professional₆

=1This user is aMathematicsstudent with anErdős numberofinfinity.

This user is an advancedmathematician.

$\int \limits _{a}^{b}\,$This user knows the difference between anintegraland anantiderivative;and so should you!$\int \,$

This user does complex math problems for fun.

met?This user prefersmetricunits, but, having grown up in the United States,cannot relate to them.

This user is auniversitystudent.

This user is aBScstudent atuniversity.

MATHThis user's favorite subject isMathematics.

This user's favorite subject isphysics.

This user enjoys the subject ofastronomy.

This user's favorite subject iscomputing.

This user's favourite subject isChemistry.

This user is anautodidactin a wide range of subjects that they never took in school or college.

This user believes that one should never stop feeding one's brain.

${\displaystyle.{\bar {0}}1}$This user believes in the existence of theinfinitesimaland canprove its existence.

This user knows that apositronis anelectronmoving backwards in time. And so should you!

This user is interested inString Theory.

grammar₇

a lotalotThis user recognizes thatlinguistic changeis a natural and desirable aspect of human language.

…in.Ending a sentence with aprepositionis something that this user is okay with.

man-
kindRegardinggender,this user prefers thevernacular,not what ispolitically correct.

This user employs amore formal style of writingin articles than in talk pages.

they…This user considerssingular theystandard, modern,informalEnglish usage, soavoids it on Wikipedia.

since

This user dislikes the use ofsinceto meanbecause.

to
too
twoThis user thinks thattoomany people have no idea howtouse words that they should have learned in gradetwo.

youoneThis user knows that one should not use "you"in encyclopedia articles or other formal works.

Majority ≠ right

This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's stilla mistake.

.TheThis user doesnotputtwo spacesafter a full stop.

A, B, and CThis user prefers theserial comma.

its&it'sThis user understands the difference betweenitsandit's.So should you.

’sThi's user know's that not every word that end's withsneed's an apostropheand will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.

This user terminates unquotedellipseson sight.This is not your blog.We end sentences properly.

ANAL 4This user advocates good grammar usage.

USage declineThis user usesAmerican English,but is appalled at its rapid and continuing deterioration.

beliefs/prejudices/views₆

This user is opposed to
political censorship.

This user thanksRichard StallmanandCreative Commonsfor letting Wikipedia becomeCCandGFDLdual licensed.

This user is opposed to onlinecensorship.

This editorthinks Wikipedia should readily allow copyrighted images and supportsfair use.We should teach and not let copyright stop learning.

This user thinks that Wikipedia has becometoo bureaucratic.

no
adsThis user isagainst advertisementson Wikipedia.

Asphyxiate.always believes
there is no cabal.
Andactively opposes it.

UARThis editor believes that account creation shouldnotbe required on Wikipedia.

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, pleaselet them know.

This user knows thatreplacing one bias with anotheris not cleanup.

Thisallegeduser can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom ofneutralityor other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.

1RRThis user prefersdiscussing changeson the talk page rather than engaging in anedit war.

This user ispro-cannabis.

This user is askeptic.

lib	This user is aliberaland doesn't understand whyAmericanshave demonised the word.

This user supports agold standard.

X

This user does not believe in the existence of humanraces,except as asocial construct.

X

This userbelieves that anyone who thinksWikipediais an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.

evenThiseditoris aneventualist.

personal₄

This user ismale.

This user is owned by one or morecats.

This user believes any universe would be a happier, safer and saner place if there were noreligion.

This user is anatheistandfearsthatreligion might have a scary effecton societies.

ANTIThis user opposesreligion as a whole.

God made this user anatheist.Doyouquestion hiswisdom?

This user is afreethinker.

This users favorite channel isHBO.

UBX₁

ubx-5This user usesentirely too many userboxes.

Hey, I am a Physics/Math student from Oregon. I have a strong belief inneutral point of viewbeing used in any and all Wikipedia articles. I also understand that replacing onebiaswith another is not helping an article. Anyone who does so shall have their post quickly changed!

I think that my many userboxes should give you a pretty good idea of how I would see any given problem. Also because I am a Physics/Math student, sometimes my grammar isn't 100%, so please forgive me there!