A barnstar for you!

edit
The Original Barnstar
For your article creations so far, most recentlyHarry Taussig,I award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work:).Ironholds(talk)19:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!Morganfitzp(talk)21:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank You

edit

Hi, Morganfitzp!

What a sweet cookie,Eddie891!And to be real, I often get tense and take stuff personally on Wikipedia. My AGF pep talk is as much a reminder to me as it is to anyone else. Anyway, nice work bringing the Panoply article up to snuff—Looks great!Morganfitzp(talk)18:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Precious

edit

"a rush of sadness coupled with paradoxical joy"

Thank you for quality articles such asMecki Mark MenandThey Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons,for improvingHalf-rubber,forenlightening,- professional playful procrastinator, you are anawesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt(talk)13:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

GoshGerda Arendt,I don't know what to say!Morganfitzp(talk)14:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
I remember the feeling (2010);) --Gerda Arendt(talk)14:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
A year ago, you were recipient no.1598of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt(talk)13:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
And oh what a precious moment it was!Morganfitzp(talk)23:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Remembered again, two years;) --Gerda Arendt(talk)07:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Let us all march forth on every March Fourth.Morganfitzp(talk)15:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
... such as today, three years of it --Gerda Arendt(talk)08:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Well withsocial distancingin vogue this year,I ain't marching anymore.Morganfitzp(talk)22:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Heartfelt Thank You

edit
The 'Heartfelt Thank You' Award
Thank you SO MUCH for developing the 'Tofu Curtain' articleMaynardClark(talk)01:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
A heartfelt you're welcome,MaynardClark.And thankyoufor the soymilk! I'm going to go get some cookies now...Morganfitzp(talk)15:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Asana

edit

I've done a bit of work on it. What d'you think needs doing next?Chiswick Chap(talk)18:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

HiChiswick Chap.I'll continue to comment on thethe article's talk pageand contribute edits as well. Also, I just added myself ontoWikiproject Yoga.Perhaps you'd like to as well?Morganfitzp(talk)23:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes, why not. Even if we're the only people there;-}Chiswick Chap(talk)11:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've tried to find Mittra's poses sorted by category, but the Dharma Yoga site doesn't work properly (tried in Chrome, Edge, and Firefox). What it did do was to offer exactly 4 category headings: Sun Salutations, Balancing Poses, Seated Poses, and Inversions, unfortunately failing to populate them properly (it displayed some tag commands to its database). That means it did not even attempt to classify standing, reclining, or twist poses, so I wonder where you got your numbers from? All the other columns are populated using that school of yoga's own categorisation, which is what we should have for Mittra also.Chiswick Chap(talk)13:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi thereChiswick Chap.Pardon the delay, I've been on break from editing for a few days. My Dharma Mittra tally comes from his book,Asanas: 608 Yoga Poses(Novato: New World Library, 2003). In his introduction, Mittra writes that he'd photographed himself executing 1,300 asanas, and from that session he created his original908 Asnansposter. While the asanas on the poster are categorized into sun salutes, followed by standing poses, inversions, and so on, the poster's categorization is not as explicit as the book, which organizes each pose category into a separate chapter. I'll say again, as I have on theasana talk pageto quantify yoga poses for Mittra—or any other teacher—is an infinite task, as Mittra states in that same introduction, "There are an infinite number of poses—that's what makes yoga a living tradition." (Mittra, 2003, p. 13). And having practiced with Dharma Mittra, Darren Rhodes, and other teachers of asana who have published hundreds of photographs of themselves practicing so many poses, they often teach asanas that are not in their books.Morganfitzp(talk)20:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Welcome back. It would I think be best to count the poses per chapter of his book rather than from the poster, then there can be an explicit ref for each total to a specific page range (or at least the chapter number) of the book. If you have it to hand...Chiswick Chap(talk)20:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I have it right right here. Please hold...Morganfitzp(talk)21:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Here are Dharma Mittra's pose quantities, listed by chapter. Note that I list number of photographicplatesrather than poses because some are repeated in myriad variations, others give different views of the same pose, and others are repeated in more than one section (e.g. the Sun Salutation & Hero Series, which are made up poses from other chapters). Tallying these plates up, I get 618, and I'm unsure which 10 don't count toward Mittra's tally of 608:

  • Sun Salutation & Hero Series: 23 plates (pp. 21–46)
  • Standing Poses: 95 plates (pp. 47–145). These include many standing backbends and twists.
  • Inversions: 110 plates (pp. 145–257). These also include many poses I'd just call "backbends."
  • Floor & Supine Poses: 267 plates (pp. 258–527). A wide variety of poses here, including lots of "prone" (belly-down) poses, lunges, seated folds, etc.
  • Arm Balancing Poses: 67 (pp. 528–595)
  • Twists & Seated Poses: 44 plates (pp. 596–641). There are actually more seated poses in his "Floor & Supine" chapter.
  • Breathing & Cleansing Practices 5 plates (pp. 642–649). These are not necessarily asanas, but more like actions (pranayama and kriya) performed in asana.
  • Resting Poses: 7 plates (pp. 650–659). Also "Floor & Supine Poses" but the stated action to be that of taking rest.

Mittra and I will both attest that asanas are not quantifiable. It's like asking, "How many grains of sand are on this beach?" when any number of grains could be split into smaller grains or compounded with other grains to form a pebble of glass. While I'd altogether abandon the chart that you've so diligently created for the asana article, I also like being helpful and admire your efforts, and I do hope you enjoy this a count of something that cannot truly be counted.Morganfitzp(talk)22:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, and all the other authors would agree; our duty is to provide the data that exist, as they directly indicate in the table what happens when 7 authors try to count and classify — you get wildly different estimates, which is your point, and mine. Many thanks for the numbers and notes, which I've used or adapted for the table.Chiswick Chap(talk)08:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, at this distance in time, I'm not sure the table of numbers says much, I may remove them in favour of a brief cited statement about numbers, and perhaps some dates. On a different matter, I noticed that what was missing was an article aboutmodern postural yoga,i.e. the thing that is practised all over the world that isn't much to do with Hinduism. I've drafted it, met some opposition, and would be glad of your brief thoughts on the article's talk page. Happy New Year!Chiswick Chap(talk)13:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

YourGAnomination ofOK (gesture)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleOK (gesture)you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofDannyS712--DannyS712(talk)00:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Very good. Or, should I say,"A-OK".Morganfitzp(talk)23:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages atTalk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 02:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC). You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712(talk)02:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages atTalk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 01:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC). You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Its almost done. Just one more error...DannyS712(talk)01:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages atTalk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 20:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC). You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712(talk)20:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

YourGAnomination ofOK (gesture)

edit

The articleOK (gesture)you nominated as agood articlehas been placed on hold.The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria,but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:OK (gesture)for things which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofDannyS712--DannyS712(talk)00:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just got home and am working on it now,DannyS712.Morganfitzp(talk)00:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

YourGAnomination ofOK (gesture)

edit

The articleOK (gesture)you nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:OK (gesture)for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you cannominate itto appear in Did you know.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofDannyS712--DannyS712(talk)03:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well OK!Morganfitzp(talk)03:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please see note on your DYK review.Yoninah(talk)22:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ah, yes. That makes sense. Please excuse the confusion.Morganfitzp(talk)15:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Talkback

edit
Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Taina Asili.
Message added 11:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC). You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew11:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Taina Asili

edit

Hello! Your submission ofTaina Asiliat theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneathyour nomination's entryand respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Kaldari(talk)00:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of OK (gesture)

edit

Hello! Your submission ofOK (gesture)at theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneathyour nomination's entryand respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Yoninah(talk)18:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for OK gesture

edit

On17 February 2019,Did you knowwas updated with a fact from the articleOK gesture,which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theOK gesture(pictured)can stand for theevil eye,the letter F, the number 9, the rising and setting of the sun, or to signal that ascuba diveris safe?You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,OK gesture),and it may be added tothe statistics pageif the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Cas Liber(talk·contribs)00:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Taina Asili

edit

On20 February 2019,Did you knowwas updated with a fact from the articleTaina Asili,which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that musicianTaina Asilistudiedoperaand fronted ahardcore punkband before starting theAfro-Caribbeangroup La Banda Rebelde?The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Taina Asili.You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Taina Asili),and it may be added tothe statistics pageif the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

— Maile(talk)12:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Special Barnstar
Congrats for gettingOK gestureto GA status and promoting it to DYK! Very interesting article (and well-written too)! Happy editing,MX()01:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Golly! Thank you.Morganfitzp(talk)16:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

YourGAnomination ofLuther Standing Bear

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleLuther Standing Bearyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofNo Great Shaker--No Great Shaker(talk)20:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

YourGAnomination ofLuther Standing Bear

edit

The articleLuther Standing Bearyou nominated as agood articlehas failed;seeTalk:Luther Standing Bearfor reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot,on behalf ofNo Great Shaker--No Great Shaker(talk)09:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Modern yoga...

edit

Hi, hope you're keeping well. We discussed [Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Yoga#Asana_and_related_articles back in December] how to group the asanas, and we sort of agreed to go under major headings. I've implemented this for around 100 major poses, each (I hope) with a Variations section listing some of the other things that are rather similar, or failing that with a See also section, suitably annotated.

There's also a completely rewrittenList of asanaswith a bit of classification of types (goes some way to resolving the how-many-are-there question, but only covers the major poses), a radically reworkedAsananow with,and a completely newModern yogathat has languished in the GAN queue for months (if you're at all interested...), along with its ownTemplate:Modern yoga.I've stripped out the sales talk and guff about health benefits from all the asana articles, and have added basic sources and a bit of history to each of them. They remain inconsistently named, some still with diacritics.

You mentioned you were happy to sort things out - there's still much to do, not least to add some of the real benefits and risks in a standard format (probably all using the same sources), and to indicate which major schools use which asanas. We could, for instance, provide things like a Bikram yoga navbox for its studiously limited set of asanas... All the best,Chiswick Chap(talk)09:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Chiswick Chap:That's super. Congrats on gettingAsanaup to GA status and thanks for the hard work you've done on yoga articles. If there are specific tasks that you'd like me to help tackle, or sections you'd like me to look at, I'm happy to do so. Best!Morganfitzp(talk)02:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I'd say the number one task would be to identify the key sources on the benefits and risks of asana practice, and to update the Health/Benefits sections ofAsanaandModern yogaaccordingly. If the sources point up specific asanas that are specially beneficial or specially risky, say so in the articles on those asanas also. We know, for instance, that the knees of Westerners not accustomed to long sitting cross-legged are in danger from hastily attempting padmasana, but this would need to beWP:MEDRS-ishly sourced. All the best,Chiswick Chap(talk)07:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Chiswick Chap:Cool. I can commit to doing this gradually. Authors sometimes use the word "contraindications" in place of "risks," and I'd aim to keep language consistent across these articles. What do think about these terminologies?Morganfitzp(talk)18:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks. Not a matter I've worked on; perhaps contraindications sounds more medical, and risks more like engineering? I'm cautious about medical-sounding terms but if it's suitably cited it should be fine.Chiswick Chap(talk)19:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Audience scores

edit

Please do not add Audience scores to articles.

  • MOS:TVRECEPTIONspecifically warns against adding audience scores.
  • WP:USERGENERATEDwarns against adding user generated content, such as scores from user voted web polls.
  • WP:RSaudiences scores are not a reliable source.

Please do not add Audience scores to articles. --109.77.232.82(talk)18:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you really think Rotten Tomatoes is being unfair (it very often is, especially for tv shows) the first thing you should do is check the reviews being used. You should find out how many reviews were given to critics as a preview, or even if the reviewer was only reviewing the first episode. Even if a critic has only reviewed one episode Rotten Tomatoes might still used that review to create their score which is supposed to represent the entire season.
People place too much trust in Rotten Tomatoes. It is also good to improve the article with actual quotes from reviews, especially if you can find a reliable critic who particularly like the series.
To summarize, please don't add audience scores. There are always better ways to improve the article. --109.77.232.82(talk)18:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, User:109.77.232.82. Your stern warning has been noted and added to my education as a Wikipedia editor.Morganfitzp(talk)19:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1936, The Spanish Revolution(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing toRonald Fraser
History Is What's Happening(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing toJanowska

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)12:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedWe Got the Beat,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBeauty and the Beat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt(talk)08:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

And may we all march forth in preciousness.Morganfitzp(talk)22:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition forRobert Rutman

edit

On 4 June 2021,In the newswas updated with an item that involved the articleRobert Rutman,which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen03:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination ofPuppetistafor deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articlePuppetistais suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppetistauntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Happyecheveria(talk)04:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Well, that sure was one speedy deletion.Morganfitzp(talk)18:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBreakmaster Cylinder,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageReply All.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)09:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Erik Greatest American Hero.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploadingFile:Erik Greatest American Hero.jpg.I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyrightstatus is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing theimage description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletionand ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to theimage use policyto learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is alist of your uploads.If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦»15:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt(talk)07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March forth, Gerda.Morganfitzp(talk)23:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDas Fürlines,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEast Village.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reverts

edit

Hi Morganfitzp. I'm sorry if you are seeing notifications about edits to this page being reverted. Belteshazzar (seeWikipedia:Long-term abuse/Belteshazzarif you are curious) was using sockpuppets to try to trick you into editing on his behalf. He is de-facto banned from Wikipedia and should not be bothering other people with his tedious nonsense. You can review recent edits toDas Fürlines,if you want to, but don't need to do anything, if you don't want to, and you certainly don't have to take any notice of what he says.DanielRigal(talk)17:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I notcied the reverts. Wikipedia is an odd enough hobby without all that!Morganfitzp(talk)18:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
This revertis worth examining. Note that the "issue" parameter causes "No." to appear, suggesting that that parameter wants a number rather than a date. I don't know whether the People Weekly quote said "they're" or "they are". TheMark E. Smithwikilink is obviously missing a ]. Near the end, there seems to be something missing after "fellow New York City".174.62.207.69(talk)15:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request for interview!

edit

Hi @Morganfitzp!Apologies for the super odd solicitation, but I'm a student in Western Mass researching the Tofu Curtain for a journalism class. I was quite surprised to see there was a Wiki page for it, and I'd love to speak with you as the mastermind behind its creation.

If you're willing, please reach out to doingresearch739// @ //gmail.com and we can set up a time to call! (I know this might feel sketchy, but I can email you back via my academic email if that helps.)

Thank you, Student in need of sourcesDoing some research(talk)13:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt(talk)08:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply