Vyacheslav84

Welcome

Hello, Vyacheslav84, andWelcome to Wikipedia! Please remember tosign your name on talk pagesby clickingoror by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in theedit summary field.Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!Shirt58(talk)08:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard– a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject FollowWikipedia etiquette Practicecivility

Your articles

Welcome!

Hello, Vyacheslav84, andwelcome to Wikipedia!While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Russian; did you know there is aRussian Wikipedia?You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!Jac16888^Talk18:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Добро пожаловать!

Здравствуйте, Vyacheslav84!Добро пожаловать в Википедию!Хотя мы и приветствуем попытки улучшения Википедии, к сожалению, Ваши правки сделаны на английском, уровень которого недостаточен для действительно полезного вклада. Кажется, Вы лучше владеете русским; знаете ли Вы о существованиирусской Википедии?Возможно, Вы предпочтёте вносить вклад в её развитие. В любом случае, добро пожаловать в проект и спасибо за усилия!Jac16888^Talk18:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Letter Zyu(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing toLandandPress

Project 1231(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toFleet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)13:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSubterrene,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNuclear(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)12:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Doc balt flot1.jpg

Thanks for uploadingFile:Doc balt flot1.jpg.I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim offair use,but its use in Wikipedia articles fails thefirst non-free content criterionin that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description pageand edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe file discussion page,write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license,or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link.Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy.If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.Stefan2(talk)14:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG

Thanks for uploadingFile:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG.I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim offair use,but its use in Wikipedia articles fails thefirst non-free content criterionin that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description pageand edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe file discussion page,write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license,or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link.Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy.If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.Stefan2(talk)14:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Подземоход Требелева.jpg

Thanks for uploadingFile:Подземоход Требелева.jpg.I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim offair use,but its use in Wikipedia articles fails thefirst non-free content criterionin that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description pageand edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe file discussion page,write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license,or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link.Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy.If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.Stefan2(talk)14:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vyacheslav84. You have new messages atStefan2's talk page.
Message added16:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC).You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2(talk)16:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Recent Images

Hi,

It appears that a few of the images that you have uploaded recently have fallen under our non-free content policy. Under this policy, we can only use the image that contains the smallest resolution. It appears that the image that you have uploaded is of a greater resolution than another one located here, thus it will be deleted soon. Also, if there is an image that falls under our non-free content policy, please also add a non-free rationale tag to the image to justify its use. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!Mike V•Talk03:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello. It appears that you have beencanvassing—leaving messages on biased users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. Whilefriendly noticesare allowed, they should belimitedandnonpartisanin distribution and should reflect aneutralpoint of view. Please do not post notices which areindiscriminately cross-posted,which espouse a certainpoint of viewor side of a debate, or which areselectively sentonly to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle ofconsensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large.Jac16888^Talk19:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of Soviet Union military bases abroad,you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesSplitandDahlak(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)13:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'mSeb az86556.I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more ofyour recent contributionstoFile:Siberian Military District.JPGbecause it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page.Thanks!Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556^{> haneʼ}06:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

• Wrote both licenses - may at first or second save. article on the removal of what is the difference? --Vyacheslav84(talk)06:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

No. You're not "writing licenses", you're posting your (losing) arguments from the deletion discussion into the file-nameapace. That's not what it's for. Please stop. If you feel you have anything new to say, go to the discussion.Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556^{> haneʼ}06:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop yourdisruptive editing.If you continue tovandalizeWikipedia, you may beblocked from editing.Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556^{> haneʼ}06:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

• blocked from editing- Fuck you.Vyacheslav84(talk)06:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Iga ninja

I redirectedThe uprising in the Iga NinjatoIga Province#Historybecause the latter article is more clearly written and gives more historical information. Why are you opposed to the redirect?Papaursa(talk)18:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

• Information from the sources enough for a separate articleThe uprising in the Iga Ninja.I createdanchorarticle for other editors. If you do a redirect, the article would not write other editors.Vyacheslav84(talk)10:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'mBracketBot.I have automatically detected thatyour edittoYiddish languagemay have broken thesyntaxby modifying 1 "()" s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.Thanks,BracketBot(talk)17:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vyacheslav84. You have new messages atVQuakr's talk page.
Message added04:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC).You canremove this noticeat any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

VQuakr(talk)04:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedMaya cave sites,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSpanish(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: Question

Hello. As I said in my edit summary you did not provide actual citations to the author's books (like page numbers and such) making it very difficult for anyone toverifyyour claims. What you did do was provide links topurchasethose books. Given that the two books are by the same author it does look a little spammy even though I'm sure that wasn't your intent. Also the edit felt a little shoe-horned in and was more about promoting the author than providing encyclopedic content. These two things can be fixed with proper citations and adjusting the tone and perhaps finding a way to rewrite it so that it isn't just a list of things but actual prose.

Also, please readWP:OVERLINK.Terms like: Japan, history, night, ambush, noise, room, samurai and probably some others should not be wikilinked as either they are obvious terms than anyone reading the English Wikipedia should know or they have already been linked to earlier in the article. Thanks.SQGibbon(talk)03:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

• Hello. I can specify the page. 2. This is a book on the history of science kandita Japan. 3. Extra links I can remove.Vyacheslav84(talk)03:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Vyacheslav84, you have had your section reverted twice, and in both cases you have re-reverted it. That is rather non-constrictive and pretty muchedit warring.Try todiscussthe issue instead (and that means discussing it on the talk page of the article).--ZarlanTheGreen(talk)15:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

• Yes.Vyacheslav84(talk)15:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
• Talk:Ninja#problem--Vyacheslav84(talk)15:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedProject Daedalus,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTony Martin(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)08:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination ofKnight against Samuraifor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKnight against Samuraiis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knight against Samuraiuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Nick-D(talk)01:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedKnight against Samurai,you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesNorman,TeutonicandChevalier(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedIon thruster,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pagePower(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing toPowerandNewton

Hall effect thruster(check to confirm|fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toPower

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI Discussion

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidentsregarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topicWP:ANI#Map_in_Westarctica.27s_article.Thank you.

February 2015

You have beenblockedfrom editing for a period of24 hoursforedit warringand violating thethree-revert rule.Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this blockby adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.However, you should read theguide to appealing blocksfirst.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changesand seekconsensus.If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution,and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.JodyB_talk15:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator,who declined the request.Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Vyacheslav84(block log•active blocks•global blocks•contribs•deleted contribs•filter log•creation log•change block settings•unblock•checkuser(log))

---

Request reason:

opponent first changed the text of the article and refused his discuss after the first cancel.Vyacheslav84(talk)16:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nothing in your unblock request justifies edit warring. You are better to discuss your own behavior than that of another editor.Chillum16:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocksfirst,then use the{{unblock}}template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please look at ouredit warringpolicy. It describes when reverting repeatedly is allowed an when it is not. Your best best at getting unblocked is to addressyour ownactions and convince the reviewing admin that the block is no longer preventative.Chillum16:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

I noticed that you have posted comments to the pageUser talk:Escargotenin a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, seeWikipedia:Talk page guidelines.This is the English Wikipedia. Discussions using the Cyrillic alphabet are not useful.Robert McClenon(talk)17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedProject Daedalus,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAbsorptivity.Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ• Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions.Thanks,DPL bot(talk)09:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

"micronations"

Please see the relevant talk pages - the question has been outstanding for months now, and there was very little interest in keeping the meaningless articles. There's a closely related outstanding RfC atTalk:Liberlandwhere you can explain your stance with regard to the most popular of the three. --Joy [shallot](talk)07:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• This issue should be addressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Vyacheslav84(talk)10:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!

Hello, Vyacheslav84. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination ofSMX-25for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSMX-25is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMX-25until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.User:HopsonRoad13:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vyacheslav84, thank you for providing additional references atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMX-25.Unfortunately, rather than providing the bare citation in the form of"French ships of the future: SMX-25 and ADVANSEA" inArmy Herald,2010 (in Russian),you provided entire quotations. I feel that it would help the other editors, who are pondering the question of deletion to just see the reference and be able to click on it, as occurs at other AfDs. Would you mind if I converted the references, as above? I'll look for your reply, here. Cheers,User:HopsonRoad21:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, you can change the quotations on the headings of articles. --Vyacheslav84(talk)10:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vyacheslav, I made an entry atDCNS (company)#Submarines and underwater weapons,using the following citation, which you provided:Barreira, Victor M.S. (2011),"Developments in French Naval Industry",in Verma, Bharat (ed.),Indian Defense Review,Lancer, p. 188,ISBN9788170621829.

If the article is deleted, this is where the redirect could go. Cheers,User:HopsonRoad15:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you! --Vyacheslav84(talk)05:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:SMX-25 - Diving frigate.JPG.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)20:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vyacheslav, I put the image intoSemi-submersible naval vessel,where I hope it will be allowed to remain. Cheers,User:HopsonRoad10:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok. --Vyacheslav84(talk)10:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vyacheslav84. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have beenblockedfrom editing for a period of31 hoursfor persistently makingdisruptive edits.Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks,then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Ivanvector(^Talk/_Edits)14:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• Block forever - it will be better. --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Look; I'm sorry it's gone this far, but there's no need to depress yourself over it. Where you went wrong wasn't only the fact that you repeatedly launched the same big thread in loooooads of different venues (which then looks little different to spamming, I'm afraid), but also, because you had to be told the same thing a few times, that then looks like you have a difficulty in communicating. You know, you stopped listening and ignored everyone else. Now, I'm not saying you did, just that that is probably how it looks, and doubtless did so to the blocking admin. Blocks are preventative, and I guess at that point in time, since your repeated appearance at various noticeboards and the like were disrupting the otherwise smooth flow of things, they had no other way of stopping the disruption other than to remove you from it. But remember that if you appeal your block. On the other thing- look, you're not having much luck with the Westartica article, I know; but two tings to also remember. One, things change, and notability changes too- what is not yet deemed notable ay well be in the future. Two, we have literally millions of articles. There must be plenty of other things that you might be interested inSerial Number54129^{...speculates}14:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

I was not going to copy this topic to other places after[1],but I'd rather go to the indefinite block due to disrespect for me, than something to explain. And yes you can remove this hereUser:Vyacheslav84/GNwhich I planned to translate for Wikipedia? --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Request for indefinite blocking

I ask you to impose on me an indefinite unit on my own. I asked the block for my own wish, so good-bye. --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator,who declined the request.Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Vyacheslav84(block log•active blocks•global blocks•contribs•deleted contribs•filter log•creation log•change block settings•unblock•checkuser(log))

---

Request reason:

I ask you to impose on me an indefinite unit on my own, it will be better than explaining something

Decline reason:

Very well, since you asked...Yunshui^Vân_Thủy15:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocksfirst,then use the{{unblock}}template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• User:Vyacheslav84/GN- remove. --Vyacheslav84(talk)15:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator,who declined the request.Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Vyacheslav84(block log•active blocks•global blocks•contribs•deleted contribs•filter log•creation log•change block settings•unblock•checkuser(log))

---

Request reason:

--Vyacheslav84(talk)09:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No reason provided.Boing! said Zebedee(talk)10:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocksfirst,then use the{{unblock}}template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator,who declined the request.Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Vyacheslav84(block log•active blocks•global blocks•contribs•deleted contribs•filter log•creation log•change block settings•unblock•checkuser(log))

---

Request reason:

my desire

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia,or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read theguide to appealing blocksfor more information.Yamla(talk)12:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocksfirst,then use the{{unblock}}template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since the initial block has long since expired, and since the extension to indefinite was granted at the user's request, I don't see any reason not to honour an unblock request at this time. I'm therefore lifting the block, although obviously if the behaviour that led to the initial 31-hour block re-occurs, any administrator should feel free to re-impose it.Yunshui^Vân_Thủy12:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Ach, I missed the fact that it was a self-requested indef - my apologies, Vyacheslav84.Boing! said Zebedee(talk)13:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. Can I ask you something? --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
    • Sure, just ask here - I'm watching.Boing! said Zebedee(talk)14:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
      • [2]- can you still help here? --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Hi Vyacheslav84! I hope that you will stay active in En:Wikipedia. I'd be glad to assist you in any project that you initiate. It's probably best to start in a sandbox. Cheers,User:HopsonRoad14:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• [3]- can you still help here? --Vyacheslav84(talk)14:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vyacheslav84, it's unclear to me and probably to the admins looking at your post, what you are trying to restore. Cheers,User:HopsonRoad15:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Vyacheslav84(talk)04:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have beenblockedindefinitelyfrom editing for as per yourrequest.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks,then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.NeilN^{talk to me}12:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator,who accepted the request.

Vyacheslav84(block log•active blocks•global blocks•contribs•deleted contribs•filter log•creation log•change block settings•unblock•checkuser(log))

---

Request reason:

my desire

Accept reason:

welcome backDlohcierekim(talk)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks! --Vyacheslav84(talk)08:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. --Vyacheslav84(talk)13:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination ofDissolution of the United Statesfor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDissolution of the United Statesis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissolution of the United Statesuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Normchou ^💬22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The old-age-security hypothesis

Hello! Your submission ofThe old-age-security hypothesisat theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entryand respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!BlueMoonset(talk)03:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission ofThe old-age-security hypothesisat theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entryand respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!4meter4(talk)04:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

RD

https://www.reddit.com/r/whatsthatbook/comments/vvozlf/an_old_thriller/andhttps://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=113689&type=yktsVyacheslav84(talk)10:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

"Kingdom of Enclava" listed atRedirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectKingdom of Enclavaand has thus listed itfor discussion.This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Princedom of Ongaluntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Thryduulf(talk)15:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Okay thanks, I'll post it. --Vyacheslav84(talk)16:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)