Yoshiman6464

You

Great job38.143.188.36(talk)01:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

File:TheNewFrontier.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:TheNewFrontier.jpg,has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion.Please see thediscussionto see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistoryof each individual page for details.Thanks,FastilyBot(talk)10:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Babadook

On7 November 2022,Did you knowwas updated with a fact from the articleThe Babadook,which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the titular monster from 2014 horror filmThe Babadookwas later adopted as a gay icon in internet memes after being listed as an "LGBT film" byNetflix?The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/The Babadook.You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,The Babadook),and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page.Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Cas Liber(talk·contribs)12:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

"Blue Shell of Death" listed atRedirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectBlue Shell of Deathand has thus listed itfor discussion.This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#Blue Shell of Deathuntil a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs13:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Steve Watch Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Steve Watch Logo.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ataru Moroboshi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Ataru Moroboshi.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WohLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:WohLogo.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)18:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission atArticles for creation:Paul Rogers (film editor)has been accepted

Paul Rogers (film editor),which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class,which is recorded on itstalk page.Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelopover time. You may like to take a look at thegrading schemeto see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Ingenuity(talk•contribs)18:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

"You just got Luigi'd"listed atRedirects for discussion

The redirectYou just got Luigi'dhas been listed atredirects for discussionto determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines.Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 10 § You just got Luigi'duntil a consensus is reached.Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs14:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Marley Quote

Sorry for getting back to you a bit late. I had not checked the earliest provenance of the quote (maybe that's something that should be asked to the wider wiki community), but almost every source I checked - that was at least RS - attributed the quote to Marley. Thebest source I found just now,with the accompanying text as follows:

"Don’t be deceived by the war rhetoric — Marley was a peacemaker. He nearly gave his life for it in 1976. Political tensions between Jamaican PM Michael Manley and opposition leader, Edward Seaga, were thick. A peace-building concert was organised and Marley was scheduled to play. Two days to the concert, gunmen attacked his home, seriously injuring his wife and manager. Marley got away with minor injuries and defiantly went ahead to play at the concert without the terrified Wailers.“The people who are trying to make this world worse aren’t taking a day off. How can I?”he said thereafter, before going on self-exile in the UK till 1978. "

-Jack Sebastian(talk)17:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@Jack Sebastian:The article was posted in 2021; the quote was posted back in January 2009 by a retired Wikipedia user. If you can find one source that predates January 2009, then I can keep the quote.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚19:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Can you explain your reasoning for needing an earlier source for the quote? My understanding that the litmus for inclusion of verification, not truth. I think it fulfills both, as the quote, in every appearance, is attributed to Marley. Even theNational Geographicconsiders it to be a quote by him1.-Jack Sebastian(talk)14:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

UTC)

Just because it was posted by a reliable source doesn’t mean it’s the correct information. Least we forget about the Brazilian Aardvark debacle from 2008-2014?The New Yorker covered it.It’s a great example ofcircular reporting.THAT’S why I need an article before January 2009.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚15:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Respectfully, I would suggest that you both re-read my previous post and understand that - in comparison to other situations - OSE. I get what you are saying about circular reporting, but that isn't up to us. Your opinion on truth of the quotedoesn't matter,and that is not meant to hurt your feelings, but instead to remind your that, in Wikipedia,THE LITMUS FOR INCLUSION IS VERIFIABILITY, NOT TRUTH.

If you are as deeply concerned about the verifiability of the quote, do more research yourself. I have provided several RS sources; you are completely free to research further, as in actually reading one or more of the books written about him. The quote is widely enough known that it might have turned up in some form there. I think it bears mentioning that in the article, one of the references are Issue 230 ofRolling Stonemagazine, published 13 January, 1977. That seems pretty solid to me - and well before the Millennium, but the Help Desk might be able to check the magazine itself for the quote if you are concerned with the veracity of the quote.

If you want, you can suggest an RfC, A 3O, or jump on up to an admin board for their opinion on the matter. I have no dog in this fight, but removing fairly well-documented and reliably-sourced information does present a problem for me. Seeing as we are apparently in disagreement, widening the circle on the issue

@Jack Sebastian:I will let the admins know about it. Also, I read through the cited Rolling Stone Article that you mentioned. The purported quote is nowhere to be found.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚05:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I had requested access to the issue and article from my local library, but I hadn't heard back just yet. Could you be so kind as to link me to your source for the magazine and article?

I've also emailed you about the admin stuff as well as reached out to some higher ups at Wiki-En about it, so I'm not going to talk about it here. -Jack Sebastian(talk)14:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

@Jack Sebastian:Thanks for reaching out to me and the admins. As for the Rolling Stones source, I used a website that copied and pasted the original article.I couldn’t find the quotation here.

In my discussion on theBob Marleypage, one user found a pre-2009 source. The Will Smith movieI Am Legend-found in this clip.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚15:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. You're right; it doesn't seem to be there. And thanks for the link toI Am Legendclip.

I would ask that you strike the inference in the article discussion page that suggests that the quote was fabricated by a Wikipedia user or added disingenuously; it muddies the waters of the discussion, seems snarky, and isn't germane to the discussion, as well as for other reasons which I outlined in the email to you. I will confine my comments about Marley to the article discussion there. -Jack Sebastian(talk)15:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I removed all mentions of any Wikipedia users in my side of the Bob Marley talk page. And thanks for understanding my point of view on the subject. I completely apologize for coming off as antagonistic.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚15:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate your actions on the matter and hope we can continue to edit collaboratively. I think Oversight will handle the rest. -Jack Sebastian(talk)16:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PrincessPeachShowtime.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:PrincessPeachShowtime.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

"UGA vs TCU"listed atRedirects for discussion

The redirectUGA vs TCUhas been listed atredirects for discussionto determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines.Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § UGA vs TCUuntil a consensus is reached.funplussmart(talk)12:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCole Bennett,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDrake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Concert

I be working on the box office section onConcert filmand wondering if you could help Finnish it off P+T

Fan Of Lion King 🦁(talk)17:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Red links

I suggest you readWP:REDYES.Schwede6606:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

I know this sounds very dumb but thanks for creating the Lynja Article I have been thinking of creating one for a while but haven’t known when or how to start Thanks have a good day!

Sincerely, SupersaurYTSupersaurYT(talk)01:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

@SupersaurYT:You are very welcome. I think it was the right time to create an article, considering that much of her earlier life was not reported before she died. After knowing about her life, I was able to find some articles from Newspapers.com to fill the gaps. I have followed her since around 2021 when I stumbled on her channel on YouTube shorts.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚01:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition forLynja

On 14 January 2024,In the newswas updated with an item that involved the articleLynja,which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.DatGuy^Talk_Contribs15:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related togender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them,a topic designated ascontentious.This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnotimply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics.These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefullyandconstructively,refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsproceduresyou may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboardor you may learn more about this contentious topichere.You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}}template.Note: This notification was triggered due to your recent edits toSweet Baby Inc.

⇒SWATJester^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!}06:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletionnomination ofFile:PhilSaviano.png

A tag has been placed onFile:PhilSaviano.pngrequesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion,because it is anon-free filefrom a commercial source (e.g.Associated Press,Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under thenon-free content guidelines,please add the appropriatenon-free use tagand rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Whpq(talk)20:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MikeHillEditor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:MikeHillEditor.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. ⟲Three Sixty!^Talk?_Work.15:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ConradNervig.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:ConradNervig.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. ⟲Three Sixty!^Talk?_Work.19:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission atArticles for creation:Bryan Hearnehas been accepted

Bryan Hearne,which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class,which is recorded on itstalk page.Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelopover time. You may like to take a look at thegrading schemeto see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creationif you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourselfwithout posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ANU^writes08:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of American Cinema Editors

Hello! Your submission ofAmerican Cinema Editorsat theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entryand respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!BlueMoonset(talk)02:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe articleThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editingyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofNineteen Ninety-Four guy--Nineteen Ninety-Four guy(talk)16:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy:Thank you so much! I'm excited to hear your thoughts on the article.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚16:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing

The articleThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editingyou nominated as agood articlehas failed;seeTalk:The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editingfor reasons whythe nominationfailed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofNineteen Ninety-Four guy--Nineteen Ninety-Four guy(talk)16:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing

Hello! Your submission ofThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editingat theDid You Know nominations pagehas been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entryand respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!SnowFire(talk)04:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Cupcakes are tasty and sweet like citations I give as a gift this to you Yoshiman6464.LlV2(talk)21:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for properly fixing the bolding of my keep on the AFD. I had forgotten how to get the apostrophe on an iPhone. Now I’ve got it.Keep up the good work!Edison(talk)00:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

"Plumbus"listed atRedirects for discussion

The redirectPlumbushas been listed atredirects for discussionto determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines.Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Plumbusuntil a consensus is reached.Utopes_(talk/cont)22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing

On30 April 2024,Did you knowwas updated with a fact from the articleThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing,which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the 2004 documentaryThe Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editingcontains interviews from dozens of film editors, including women under-represented in the field?The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing.You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing),and the hook may be added tothe statistics pageafter its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Cas Liber(talk·contribs)00:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Great work on a fascinating subject!Viriditas(talk)19:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

@Viriditas:Thank you so much. I found a lot of interesting insight regarding the documentary with the power of 5x expansion. Although the page failed to get the Good Article nomination - especially with the messy reception section - several users helped clean up the article.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚20:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Did you get a chance to hearthis interviewin March? The transcript is not as good as listening to it, but that link has both.Viriditas(talk)19:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Dazed and Confused

Hi Yoshiman6464, just following up onTalk:Dazed and Confused (film)/GA1which you opened a month ago. Are you still planning to proceed with this review?CMD(talk)15:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis:Of course. My apologies; I got a bit busy this past month. I’ll release my review this weekend. The article looks good so far.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚15:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for taking on the review.CMD(talk)16:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Right Side Broadcasting.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Right Side Broadcasting.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HelloFresh.png

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:HelloFresh.png.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)17:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination ofUlterior Motives (The Lost Album)for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleUlterior Motives (The Lost Album)is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulterior Motives (The Lost Album)until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skyshiftertalk00:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Video games based on Rick and Mortyhas been nominated for splitting

Category:Video games based on Rick and Mortyhas been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorizationguidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entryon thecategories for discussionpage. Thank you.QuantumFoam66(talk)21:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GottaCatchEmAll.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:GottaCatchEmAll.jpg.The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use.However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticleswill be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.Thank you. --B-bot(talk)02:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofBasket of deplorables

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe articleBasket of deplorablesyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofRiley1012--Riley1012(talk)19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofBasket of deplorables

The articleBasket of deplorablesyou nominated as agood articlehas been placed on hold.The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria,but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Basket of deplorablesandTalk:Basket of deplorables/GA1for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofRiley1012--Riley1012(talk)16:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofR/The Donald

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewingthe articleR/The Donaldyou nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofIntentionallyDense--IntentionallyDense(talk)06:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofBasket of deplorables

The articleBasket of deplorablesyou nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:Basket of deplorablesfor comments about the article, andTalk:Basket of deplorables/GA1for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appearin the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate itwithin the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofRiley1012--Riley1012(talk)23:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@Riley1012:Thank you so much!Yoshiman6464^♫🥚00:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofR/The Donald

The articleR/The Donaldyou nominated as agood articlehas been placed on hold.The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria,but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:R/The DonaldandTalk:R/The Donald/GA1for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofIntentionallyDense--IntentionallyDense(talk)21:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense:I will check the comments at the end of the weekend. I am currently on vacation with my family. Most likely on Monday, I'll address the comments and work on the article.Yoshiman6464^♫🥚21:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

YourGAnomination ofR/The Donald

The articleR/The Donaldyou nominated as agood articlehas passed;seeTalk:R/The Donaldfor comments about the article, andTalk:R/The Donald/GA1for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appearin the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate itwithin the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot,on behalf ofIntentionallyDense--IntentionallyDense(talk)08:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee electionsis now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible usersare allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidatesand submit your choices on thevoting page.If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}}to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)