TheWeimar Republic,[d]officially known as theGerman Reich,[e]was a historical period of Germany from 9 November 1918 to 23 March 1933, during which it was aconstitutionalfederal republicfor the first time in history; hence it is also referred to, and unofficially proclaimed itself, as theGerman Republic.[f]The period's informal name is derived from the city ofWeimar,which hosted theconstituent assemblythat established its government. In English, the republic was usually simply called "Germany", with "Weimar Republic" (a term introduced byAdolf Hitlerin 1929) not commonly used until the 1930s.
German Reich Deutsches Reich(German) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1918–1933[1][2][3] | |||||||||
 Flag
(1919–1933)  Coat of arms
(1928–1935) | |||||||||
| Motto:Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit ( "Unity and Justice and Freedom" ) | |||||||||
| Anthem:Das Lied der Deutschen "The Song of the Germans" (from 1922)[4] | |||||||||
  | |||||||||
| Capital and largest city | Berlin 52°31′N13°23′E/ 52.517°N 13.383°E | ||||||||
| Official languages | German | ||||||||
| Common languages | Unofficial: | ||||||||
| Religion | 1925 census:[5]
| ||||||||
| Demonym(s) | German | ||||||||
| Government | Federalrepresentativesemi-presidential republic
| ||||||||
| President | |||||||||
• 1919–1925 | Friedrich Ebert | ||||||||
• 1925–1933 | Paul von Hindenburg | ||||||||
| Chancellor | |||||||||
• 1919 (first) | Friedrich Ebert | ||||||||
• 1933 (last) | Adolf Hitler | ||||||||
| Legislature | Bicameral | ||||||||
| Reichsrat(de facto) | |||||||||
| Reichstag | |||||||||
| Historical era | Interwar period | ||||||||
• Established | 9 November 1918 | ||||||||
| 11 August 1919 | |||||||||
• Admitted to theLeague of Nations | 8 September 1926 | ||||||||
•Rule by decreebegins | 29 March 1930[6] | ||||||||
•HitlerinauguratedChancellor | 30 January 1933 | ||||||||
| 27 February 1933 | |||||||||
| 23 March 1933[1][2][3] | |||||||||
| Area | |||||||||
| 1925[7] | 468,787 km2(181,000 sq mi) | ||||||||
| Population | |||||||||
• 1925[7] | 62,411,000 | ||||||||
• Density | 133.129/km2(344.8/sq mi) | ||||||||
| Currency |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of | |||||||||
After the end of theFirst World War(1914–1918), Germany was exhausted andsued for peacein desperate circumstances. Awareness of imminent defeat sparked arevolution,the abdicationofKaiser Wilhelm II,formal surrender to theAllies,and the proclamation of the Weimar Republic on 9 November 1918.[8]
In its initial years, grave problems beset the Republic, such ashyperinflationandpolitical extremism,including political murders and two attemptedseizures of powerby contendingparamilitaries;internationally, it suffered isolation, reduced diplomatic standing and contentious relationships with the great powers. By 1924, a great deal of monetary and political stability was restored, and the republic enjoyed relative prosperity for the next five years; this period, sometimes known as theGolden Twenties,was characterised by significant cultural flourishing, social progress, and gradual improvement in foreign relations. Under theLocarno Treatiesof 1925, Germany moved toward normalising relations with its neighbours, recognising most territorial changes under the 1919Treaty of Versaillesand committing never to go to war. The following year, it joined theLeague of Nations,which marked its reintegration into the international community.[g][9]Nevertheless, especially on the political right, there remained strong and widespread resentment against the treaty and those who had signed and supported it.
TheGreat Depressionof October 1929 severely impacted Germany's tenuous progress; high unemployment and subsequent social and political unrest led to the collapse of ChancellorHermann Müller'sgrand coalition and the beginning of thepresidential cabinets.From March 1930 onwards, PresidentPaul von Hindenburgusedemergency powersto backChancellorsHeinrich Brüning,Franz von Papenand GeneralKurt von Schleicher.The Great Depression, exacerbated by Brüning's policy ofdeflation,led to a surge inunemployment.[10]On 30 January 1933, Hindenburg appointedAdolf Hitleras Chancellor to head a coalition government; Hitler's far-rightNazi Partyheld two out of ten cabinet seats. Von Papen, as Vice-Chancellor and Hindenburg's confidant, was to serve as theéminence grisewho would keep Hitler under control; these intentions severely underestimated Hitler's political abilities. By the end of March 1933, theReichstag Fire Decreeand theEnabling Act of 1933were used in the perceived state of emergency to effectively grant the new Chancellor broad power to act outside parliamentary control. Hitler promptly used these powers to thwart constitutional governance and suspend civil liberties, which brought about the swift collapse of democracy at the federal and state level, and the creation of aone-partydictatorship under his leadership.
Until theend of World War II in Europein 1945, the Nazis governed Germany under the pretense that all the extraordinary measures and laws they implemented were constitutional; notably, there was never an attempt to replace or substantially amend theWeimar constitution.Nevertheless, Hitler's seizure of power (Machtergreifung) had effectively ended the republic, replacing its constitutional framework withFührerprinzip,the principle that "the Führer's word is above all written law".
Name and symbols
editThe Weimar Republic is so called because theWeimar National Assemblythat adopted its constitution met inWeimarfrom 6 February to 11 August 1919,[11]but the name only became mainstream after 1933.
Terminology
editEven though the National Assembly chose to retain the old nameDeutsches Reich(Art. 1 of the Constitution),[12]hardly anyone used it during the Weimar period, and no single name for the new state gained widespread acceptance.[13]To the right of the spectrum, the politically engaged rejected the new democratic model and were appalled to see the honour of the traditional wordReichassociated with it.[14]The CatholicCentre Partyfavoured the termDeutscher Volksstaat(German People's State),[h]while on the moderate left, ChancellorFriedrich Ebert'sSocial Democratic Party of GermanypreferredDeutsche Republik(German Republic).[14]By the mid-1920s, most Germans referred to their government informally as theDeutsche Republik,but for many, especially on the right, the word "Republik"was a painful reminder of a government structure that they believed had been imposed by foreign statesmen and of the expulsion of EmperorWilhelm IIin the wake of a massive national humiliation.[14]
The first recorded mention of the termRepublik von Weimar(Republic of Weimar) came during a speech delivered by Adolf Hitler at a Nazi Party rally in Munich on 24 February 1929. A few weeks later, the termWeimarer Republikwas first used again by Hitler in a newspaper article.[13]Only during the 1930s did the term become mainstream, both within and outside Germany.
According to historianRichard J. Evans:[15]
The continued use of the term 'German Empire',Deutsches Reich,by the Weimar Republic... conjured up an image among educated Germans that resonated far beyond the institutional structures Bismarck created: the successor to theRoman Empire;the vision of God's Empire here on earth; the universality of its claim tosuzerainty;and a more prosaic but no less powerful sense, the concept of a German state that would include all German speakers in Central Europe – 'one People, one Reich, one Leader', as the Nazi slogan was to put it.
Flag and coat of arms
editThe black-red-gold tricolour of the1848 German revolutionswas named as the national flag in theWeimar Constitution.[16]It was abolished after the entry into force of the Enabling Act of 1933, when the Nazi Party gained total power, in favour of two co-official national flags: the oldblack-white-red imperial tricolourand theflag of the Nazi Party.From 1935, the Nazi flag became the sole national flag of the Third Reich, and after World War II, both theFederal Republic of Germanyand theGerman Democratic Republicreadopted the Weimar-era flag. The coat of arms was initially based on theReichsadler( "imperial eagle" ) introduced by thePaulskirche Constitutionof 1849, and announced in November 1919. In 1928, a new design by Karl-Tobias Schwab was adopted as national coat of arms, which was used until being replaced by theNaziReichsadlerin 1935, and readopted by the Federal Republic of Germany in 1950.
Armed forces
edit
Following Germany's defeat in World War I, several million soldiers of theImperial German Armyeither simply dispersed on their own or were formally demobilized. The provisional civilian government and theSupreme Army Command(OHL) planned to transfer the remaining units to a peacetime army. Under the terms of theTreaty of Versailles,the new army, theReichswehr,was limited to 100,000 men and theReichsmarine(navy), to 15,000. The treaty prohibited an air force, submarines, large warships and armoured vehicles.[17]
The official formation of theReichswehrtook place on 1 January 1921, after the limitations had been met. The soldiers of theReichswehrtook their oath to theWeimar Constitution.The commander-in-chief was theReich president,while the Reich minister of the armed forces exercised command authority. Military right of command (Kommandogewalt) was in the hands of the OHL. The resulting dualism between civilian power and military command was to become a heavy burden on the Republic. WhereasReichswehrMinisterOtto Gesslerwas content with limited political and administrative duties during his tenure (1920–1928),Hans von Seeckt,Chief of Army Command from 1920 to 1926, succeeded in largely removing theReichswehrfrom the control of theReichstag.Under Seeckt theReichswehrdeveloped into what many historians consider a "state within the state".[18][19]
During the 1920Kapp Putsch,Seeckt refused to deploy theReichswehragainst theFreikorpsinvolved in the putsch[20]but immediately afterwards had theRuhr Red Armybrutally suppressed during theRuhr uprising.In 1921 theReichswehrorganized theBlack Reichswehr,a secret reserve networked within theReichswehrand organised as labour battalions (Arbeitskommandos) to circumvent the Treaty of Versailles' 100,000 man limit on the German army.[21]The Black Reichswehr was never involved in direct military action and was dissolved in 1923 after a group of its members attempted to overthrow the government in theKüstrin Putsch.[22]TheReichswehralso developed far-reaching cooperation with the SovietRed Army,leading among other things to the secret training of German military pilots in clear violation of the Treaty of Versailles.[23]
With Seeckt's fall in 1926, theReichswehrmade a change in course for which ColonelKurt von Schleicherwas primarily responsible. The goal was to arouse broad social support for rearmament and to militarize society itself for the purpose of future warfare.[24]UnderPaul von Hindenburg'sReich presidency,Reichswehrleadership gained increasing political influence and eventually helped determine the composition of the Reich governments. As a result, theReichswehrcontributed significantly to the development of an authoritarianpresidential systemduring the final phase of the Weimar Republic.[25]
In 1935, two years afterAdolf Hitler's rise to power,theReichswehrwas renamedWehrmacht.It was the unified armed forces of the Nazi regime.
History
editBackground
editGermany and theCentral Powersfought theAllies of WWIbetween 28 July 1914 and 11 November 1918. The war ended with 20 million military and civilian deaths,[26]including 2,037,000 German soldiers[27]and from 424,000[28]to 763,000[29][30]civilians, many of them from disease and starvation as a result of the Alliedblockade of Germany.
After four years of war on multiple fronts in Europe and around the world, the finalAllied offensivebegan in August 1918, and the position of Germany and the Central Powers deteriorated,[31][32]leading them to sue for peace. After initial offers were rejected by the Allied Powers, the hunger and privation of the war years came together with the awareness of an impending military defeat[33]to help spark theGerman Revolution.On 9 November 1918,a republic was proclaimed,[34]and the abdication ofKaiser Wilhelm IIwas announced,[35][36]marking the end ofImperial Germanyand the beginning of the Weimar Republic. Thearmisticethat ended the fighting was signed on 11 November.
Germany lost the war because its allies were facing defeat and its economic resources were running out, while by late summer 1918 fresh American troops were arriving in France at the rate of 10,000 per day. Support among the population had begun to crumble in 1916, and by mid-1918 many Germans wanted an end to the war. Increasing numbers of them began to associate with the political left, such as theSocial Democratic Partyand the more radicalIndependent Social Democratic Party,which demanded an end to the war. When it became obvious to the generals that defeat was at hand, GeneralErich Ludendorffconvinced the Kaiser that Germany needed to pursue an armistice and that the majority parties in theReichstag,not the OHL, had to take responsibility for it.[37]Although in retreat, the German armies were still on French and Belgian territory when the war ended on 11 November. Ludendorf andPaul von Hindenburgthen began proclaiming that it was the defeatism of the civilian population – especially the socialists – that had made defeat inevitable. Thestab-in-the-back mythwas spread by the Right throughout the 1920s and ensured that many monarchists and conservatives would refuse to support the government of what they called the "November criminals".[38]The destabilising effect of the stab-in-the-back myth on the Weimar democracy was an important factor in the rise ofNational Socialism.[39]
November Revolution (1918–1919)
edit
On 29 October 1918, a rebellion broke out among sailors atWilhelmshaven;similar unrest then spread to become theKiel mutinyon 3 November. Sailors, soldiers and workers began electingworkers' and soldiers' councils(Arbeiter- und Soldatenräte) modelled after thesovietsof the 1917Russian Revolution.The revolution spread throughout Germany, and participants seized military and civil power in individual cities.[40]The power takeovers were achieved everywhere without loss of life.[citation needed]
At the time, the socialist movement, which represented mostly labourers, was split among two major left-wing parties: theIndependent Social Democratic Party of Germany(USPD), which called for immediate peace negotiations and favoured a soviet-style command economy, and theSocial Democratic Party of Germany(SPD), also known as the Majority Social Democratic Party of Germany (MSPD), which had supported the war and favoured a parliamentary system. The rebellion caused great fear among supporters of the monarchy and in the middle classes because of the soviet-style aspirations of the councils. To centrist and conservative citizens, the country looked to be on the verge of a communist revolution.[41]
By 7 November the revolution had reachedMunich,resulting in the flight of KingLudwig III of Bavaria.[42]The MSPD decided to make use of their support at the grassroots level and put themselves at the front of the movement. They joined the calls for KaiserWilhelm IIabdicate, and when he refused, ChancellorMaximilian of Badenmade a public announcement that the Kaiser andCrown Prince Wilhelmhad already done so.[43]Gustav Noske(MSPD) was sent to Kiel to prevent any further unrest and took on the task of controlling the mutinous sailors and their supporters in the Kiel barracks. The sailors and soldiers welcomed him, and he was able to defuse the situation.[44]
On 9 November 1918, theGerman Republic was proclaimedby MSPD memberPhilipp Scheidemannat theReichstagbuilding in Berlin, angeringFriedrich Ebert,the leader of the MSPD, who thought that the question of monarchy or republic should be answered by a national assembly.[45]Two hours later, aFree Socialist Republic was proclaimedat theBerlin Palace.The proclamation was issued byKarl Liebknecht,co-leader withRosa Luxemburgof the communistSpartakusbund(Spartacus League), a group of a few hundred supporters of the Russian Revolution that had allied itself with the USPD in 1917.[46]On the same day, in a move that was contrary to the constitution because only the Kaiser could appoint a chancellor, Prince Max of Baden, at Ebert's request, transferred his powers as chancellor to him.[47]In view of the mass support for more radical reforms among the workers' councils, a coalition government called theCouncil of the People's Deputies(Rat der Volksbeauftragten) was established, consisting of three MSPD and three USPD members. Led by Ebert for the MSPD andHugo Haasefor the USPD, it governed Germany from November 1918 to January 1919.[48]Although the new government was confirmed by the Berlin Workers' and Soldiers' Council, it was opposed by the Spartacus League.
On 11 November 1918,an armistice was signed at Compiègneby German representatives. It effectively ended military operations betweenthe Alliesand Germany. It amounted to a German capitulation, without any concessions by the Allies; the naval blockade was to continue until complete peace terms were agreed on.[49]
The Executive Council of the Workers' and Soldiers' Council of Greater Berlin called for aNational Congress of Councils(Reichsrätekongress) which took place from 16 to 21 December 1918. Against the opposition of the more radical members who demanded a socialist republic, Ebert, backed by the large MSPD majority at the Congress, was able to schedule elections for a provisionalNational Assemblythat would act as an interim parliament and be given the task of writing a democratic constitution for a parliamentary government.[50]
To ensure that the fledgling government maintained control over the country, Ebert and GeneralWilhelm Groener,Ludendorff's successor as leader of the Supreme Army Command (OHL), concluded the secretEbert–Groener pacton 10 November. Over the telephone, Ebert promised that he would allow sole command of the troops to remain with the officer corps, while Groener pledged that the military would be loyal to the government and that it would help it in its fight against left-wing revolutionaries.[51]The agreement marked the acceptance of the new government by the military, but the newReichswehrarmed forces, limited by theTreaty of Versaillesto 100,000 army soldiers and 15,000 sailors, remained fully under the control of the German officer class.[52]
A rift developed between the MSPD and USPD after Ebert called upon the OHL for troops to put down amutinyby a leftist military unit on 23/24 December 1918 in which members of theVolksmarinedivision(People's Navy Division) captured the city's garrison commanderOtto Welsof the MSPD and occupied the Reich Chancellery where the Council of the People's Deputies had its offices. The ensuing street fighting left 11Volksmarinedivisionmembers and 56 members of the regular army dead.[53]The USPD leaders were angered by what they believed was treachery by the MSPD, which in their view had joined with the anti-communist military to suppress the revolution. As a result, the USPD left the Council of the People's Deputies after only seven weeks. On 30 December, the split deepened when theCommunist Party of Germany(KPD) was formed out of a number of radical left-wing groups, including theSpartacus Leagueand the left wing of the USPD.[46]
In January, the Spartacus League, in what was known as theSpartacist uprising,took advantage of a large strike in Berlin and attempted to establish a communist government. The uprising was put down by paramilitaryFreikorpsunits consisting of volunteer soldiers. Following bloody street fights,Rosa LuxemburgandKarl Liebknechtwere summarily killed after their arrests on 15 January.[54]With the affirmation of Ebert, those responsible were not tried before a court-martial, leading to lenient sentences, which made Ebert unpopular among radical leftists.[citation needed]
TheNational Assembly elections,in which women were allowed to vote for the first time, took place on 19 January 1919.[55]The MSPD won the largest share of the votes at 37.9%, with the USPD fifth at 7.6%.[56]To avoid the ongoing fights in Berlin, the National Assembly convened in the city ofWeimar,giving the future Republic its unofficial name. TheWeimar Constitutioncreated a parliamentary republic with theReichstagelected byproportional representation.[57]
During the debates in Weimar, fighting continued sporadically across Germany. On 7 April 1919 theBavarian Soviet Republicwas declared in Munich but quickly put down byFreikorpsand remnants of the regular army. The fall of theMunich Soviet Republicto these units, many of which were on the extreme right, resulted in the growth of far-right, antisemitic movements and organisations inBavaria,includingOrganisation Consul,theNazi Party,and societies of exiled Russian monarchists.[58]Revolutionary sentiment also arose in the eastern states where interethnic discontent between Germans and minority Poles led to theSilesian Uprisingsand theGreater Poland uprisingin the GermanProvince of Posen,which became part of theSecond Polish Republicunder the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.[59]
Years of crisis (1919–1923)
editBurden from the First World War
editIn the four years following the First World War, the situation of most German civilians remained dire. The post-war economic crisis was a result of lost pre-war industrial exports, the loss of imported raw materials and foodstuffs due to the continental blockade, the loss of Germany's overseas colonies and the worsening debt balances that had been exacerbated by Germany's heavy reliance on bonds to pay for the war. The economic losses can be attributed in part to the extension of the Allied blockade of Germany until theTreaty of Versailleswas signed on 28 June 1919. It is estimated that between 100,000[60]and 250,000[61]: 166 German civilians died of disease or starvation between the end of the war and the signing of the treaty. Many German civilians expected life to return to pre-war normality after it was lifted, but the severe food shortages continued. In 1922, for example, meat consumption had not increased since the war years. At 22 kilograms per person per year, it was less than half of the 52 kilograms consumed in 1913. German citizens felt the food shortages more deeply than during the war because the reality contrasted so starkly with their expectations.[62]
Immediate post-war industrial production fell to the levels of the 1880s, or 57 percent of its value in 1913. The 1919 per capita GDP was only 73 percent of the comparable 1913 figure.[63]Controlled demobilisation kept unemployment initially at around one million. By January 1922 the unemployment rate had sunk to just 0.9%,[64]but inflation caused most workers' real wages to be significantly lower than they were in 1913.[65]Thehyperinflationthat peaked in late 1923 had its worst effects on government workers, whose wages did not keep pace with private sector workers, and on middle class Germans who had invested in war bonds[66]or who relied on savings, investments or pensions for their living. What had once been substantial savings became essentially worthless due to the enormous fall in thePapiermark's value.[67]
After four years of war and famine, many German workers were disenchanted with thecapitalistsystem and hoped for a new era undersocialismor communism.Socialistsdominated the new revolutionary government in Berlin, and numerous short-livedcouncil republicswere set up in cities across Germany.[68]Even after they were suppressed, ideological conflicts between the Left and supporters of the former empire led topolitical violenceandextremism.The young republic found itself in a nearly constant economic and political crisis until 1924.
Treaty of Versailles
editThe Treaty of Versailles ended the state of war between Germany and most of theAllied powersand set the conditions for peace. It was signed 28 June 1919 and can be divided into four main categories: territorial issues, disarmament, reparations and assignment of guilt.
Territorially, Germany had to renounce sovereignty over its colonies[69]and in Europe lost 65,000 sq km (25,000 sq mi) or about 13% of its former territory – including 48% of its iron and 10% of its coal resources – along with 7 million people, or 12% of its population.[70]TheSaarlandwas put under the control of theLeague of Nationsfor 15 years, and the output of the area's coal mines went to France.[71]Alsace–Lorraine,whichPrussiahad annexed following theFranco-Prussian Warof 1870/71, once again became French.[72]The northern part ofSchleswig-Holsteinwent to Denmark following a plebiscite.[73]In the east, a significant amount of territory was lost to a restoredPoland.[74]TheMemel Territorywas ceded to the Allied powers,[75]and Danzig went to the League of Nations as theFree City of Danzig.[76]ThePolish CorridorleftEast Prussiaphysically separated from the rest of Germany.
Under the terms of both the Armistice of 1918 and of the Treaty of Versailles, French, British, Belgian and American troopsoccupied the Rhineland,the area of Germany on the west bank of theRhine river,together with bridgeheads on the east bank nearCologne,MainzandKoblenz.In addition, the Rhineland and an area stretching 50 kilometers east of the Rhine was to be demilitarized.[77]France had demanded the occupation both to protect itself from a renewed German attack and as collateral for German reparations. The occupation was to last 5 years in the British zone, 10 in the American and 15 years in the French and Belgian zones, until 1934, but the last foreign troops evacuated the Rhineland on 30 June 1930.[78]
The treaty's disarmament provisions were intended to make the future German army incapable of offensive action. It was limited to no more than 100,000 men with only 4,000 officers and no general staff; the navy could have at most 15,000 men and 1,500 officers. TheRhinelandwas to be demilitarized and occupied and all fortifications in the Rhineland and 50 kilometres (31 miles) east of the river demolished. Germany was prohibited from having an air force, tanks, poison gas, heavy artillery, submarines ordreadnoughts.A large number of its ships and all of its air-related armaments were to be surrendered.[73][17]
Germany had to compensate the Allied Powers for the losses and damages of the war, with the exact amount left to be determined at a later date (Article 233).[79]In the short term it was required to pay the equivalent of 20 billion gold marks in installments through April 1921 (Article 235).[79]
The most contentious article of the treaty, the so-calledWar Guilt Clause,did not use the word "guilt". It stated that Germany accepted full responsibility for all the loss and damage from a war that was imposed on the Allies by the aggression of Germany and its allies (Article 231).[79]
The implications of Article 231 and the territorial losses especially angered the Germans. The treaty was reviled as a dictated rather than a negotiated peace.Philipp Scheidemann,then minister president of Germany, said to the Weimar National Assembly on 12 May 1919, "What hand should not wither that puts this fetter on itself and on us?"[80]He resigned rather than accept the terms, but after the Allies threatened to resume hostilities, the National Assembly voted to approve the treaty on 23 June.[81]It was signed in Paris five days later.
Explaining the rise of extreme nationalist movements in Germany shortly after the war, British historianIan Kershawpointed to the "national disgrace" that was "felt throughout Germany at the humiliating terms imposed by the victorious Allies and reflected in the Versailles Treaty...with its confiscation of territory on the eastern border and even more so its 'guilt clause'."[82]Adolf Hitler repeatedly blamed the Republic and its democracy for accepting the oppressive terms of the treaty.[83]
War guilt
editArticle 231 of the Versailles Treaty was widely perceived not only as a legal legitimisation of reparations but also as a moral condemnation of Germany, and it triggered a storm of indignation among the German public.[84]The hostility towards it came from across the political spectrum, from the far right to the moderate governing parties to the KPD.
After the treaty came into force, the Foreign Office continued the state's control of the debate over war guilt. The War Guilt Department financed and directed theCentre for the Study of the Causes of the War,which was to provide "scientific" support for the "campaign of innocence" abroad. For war-innocence propaganda at home, a "Working Committee of German Associations"was founded with representatives of many groups considered" fit for good society ".[85]In 1919 the Weimar National Assembly established aparliamentary committeeto inquire into the events that had led to the "outbreak, prolongation and loss of the First World War". Its results were of questionable value due to a lack of cooperation from the civil service and military and to increasing interference from the government, which wanted to prevent a German admission of guilt before the world public.[86]The committee met until 1932.
During the course of World War I, war reporting was the responsibility of theGerman General Staffand after 1918 of thePotsdam Reich Archivesfounded by GeneralHans von Seeckt,[87]which dedicated itself to the task of "disproving" German war guilt and war crimes. As a result it was the leadership of the Reichswehr with its largely anti-democratic civil service personnel that, along with the Foreign Office, determined the portrayal of the war in the Weimar Republic.
All in all, there was little objective and critical questioning of the causes of the war or of Germany's responsibility for it in academia, politics or the media during the Weimar period. The official view of history continued to follow the argument issued by the OHL in 1914 that Germany had been threatened by invasion and encirclement. Revising the conditions of the Versailles Treaty became the main goal of German foreign policy.[88]
The consensus opposing the "war guilt clause" did much to promote agitation against foreign countries and the Weimar Constitution. Both the DNVP and, in particular, the NSDAP questioned the entire post-war order and propagated a "war guilt lie". In line with national conservative and bourgeois right-wing parties, they accused the governing parties of having contributed to Germany's humiliation by signing the treaty and of denying it the right to self-determination.[89]
Political turmoil: Kapp Putsch and Ruhr uprising
editThe young republic was exposed from the beginning to attacks from both the extreme right and extreme left. The Left accused the Social Democrats of betraying the ideals of the labour movement because of their alliance with the old elites; the Right held the supporters of the Republic responsible for Germany's defeat in the First World War, denigrating them as "November criminals" and insinuating that the German army, which was still fighting on enemy soil when the war ended, had been stabbed in the back by them and the revolution (thestab-in-the-back myth).[90]
In the March 1920Kapp Putsch,Freikorps units underGeneral von Lüttwitzoccupied the government quarter in Berlin. In an attempt to reverse the revolution and install an autocratic government, the former Prussian civil servantWolfgang Kappappointed himself Reich chancellor and Lüttwitz Reichswehr minister and commander-in-chief of the Reichswehr. The legal government fled Berlin and called for a general strike. The putsch quickly failed due in large part to the refusal of the ministerial bureaucracy to obey Kapp's orders.[91]The Reichswehr, however, proved itself to be unreliable. It adopted a wait-and-see attitude under General von Seeckt, the head of theTroop Office,who said that "Reichswehr do not fire on Reichswehr".[92]
Some among the working class did not limit themselves to passive resistance to the Kapp Putsch. Especially in theRuhr,where dissatisfaction with the lack of nationalisation of key industries was particularly high, councils were formed that sought to seize local power. In theRuhr uprising,civil war-like fighting broke when theRuhr Red Army,made up of some 50,000 armed workers, mostly adherents of the KPD and USPD, used the disruption caused by the general strike to take control of the industrial district. After bloody battles in which an estimated 1,000 insurgents and 200 soldiers died, Reichswehr and Freikorps units suppressed the revolt in early April.[93]
In Bavaria the Kapp Putsch led to an anti-republican government reshuffle that made the Free State a so-called "cell of order" (Ordnungszelle) within the Weimar state and a rallying point for right-wing conservative and reactionary forces.[94]The unstable political conditions in the early phase of the Weimar Republic were also evident in theReichstag elections of 1920,in which the centre-leftWeimar Coalition,which until then had had a three-quarters majority, lost 125 seats to parties on both the left and right.[95]
Political assassinations
edit
The sharp political polarisation that had occurred was visible in the assassinations of important representatives of the Republic by members of the right-wing extremistOrganisation Consul.Finance MinisterMatthias Erzbergerwas assassinated in August 1921 and Foreign MinisterWalther Rathenauin June 1922. Both men had been defamed as compliant to Germany's former enemies in the matter of reparations payments. Erzberger was also attacked for signing the armistice agreement in 1918, and Rathenau had sought to break Germany's external isolation after the First World War through theTreaty of Rapallo,which opened diplomatic relations with the newSoviet Union,renounced all war claims and mutually cancelled pre-war debts. Rathenau also attracted right-wing extremist hatred because he was a Jew. The passing of theLaw for the Protection of the Republic,which increased the punishments for politically motivated acts of violence, established a special court for the protection of the Republic and prohibited organizations, printed material and rallies that opposed the constitutional republican form of government, was intended to put a stop to the Republic's right-wing enemies. The conservative judiciary from the imperial era that still remained in place and passed lenient sentences against right-wing state criminals contributed to the fact that their activities could not be permanently deterred.[96]
Reparations and the occupation of the Ruhr
editAfter a series of international conferences to determine the reparations for which Germany was liable, an amount of 132 billion Reichsmarks was presented in May 1921, to be paid either in gold or commodities such as iron, steel and coal.[97]ChancellorJoseph Wirthhad no choice other than to accept, but in an attempt to have the amount lowered, he began the German policy of "fulfilment" (Erfüllungspolitik). By attempting to meet the payments, it intended to show the Allies that the demands were beyond Germany's economic means.[98]In May 1922, when the Reichsmark was rapidly losing value, Germany was granted a payment moratorium over strong French objections.[97]
In January 1923 France declared Germany in default. The French minister presidentRaymond Poincarésaw Germany's failure to pay reparations as a lever that he could use to achieve the separation of the Rhineland from the German Reich, a French demand that had been refused by the British at Versailles.[99]After theReparation Commissiondetermined that German coal deliveries were short, French and Belgian troops on 11 January 1923 marched into the Rhineland,[98]Germany's most productive industrial region, and took control of most of its mining and manufacturing companies. The German government under ChancellorWilhelm Cunoresponded with a policy of non-violent passive resistance to the occupation. It underwrote the costs of idled factories and mines and paid the workers who were on strike. Unable to meet the enormous costs by any other means, it resorted to printing money. Along with the debts the state had incurred during the war, it was one of the major causes of the hyperinflation that followed.[100]
Realizing that continuing the course was untenable, the new Reich ChancellorGustav Stresemanncalled off the passive resistance in September 1923.[101]The French and Belgian occupation ended in August 1925, following an agreement (theDawes Plan) to restructure Germany's payments. The total reparations payout from 1920 to 1931 (when payments were suspended indefinitely) was 20 billionmarks.12.5 billion was cash that came mostly from loans provided by New York bankers. The rest was goods such as coal and chemicals, or from assets like railway equipment.
Hyperinflation
edit
The hyperinflation fueled by the government's response to the occupation of the Ruhr caused the cost of a loaf of bread to rise from 3 Reichsmarks in 1922 to 80 billion Reichsmarks in November 1923. Prices were rising so rapidly that people rushed to spend their pay at lunch breaks before it lost any more of its value. Foreign trade became all but impossible, as did German ability to pay reparations.[102]While personal savings became virtually worthless, so did fixed debts. Middle class owners of land or houses often came out ahead because their debts lost value along with the currency. Large industrial concerns profited in the same manner, and wealth concentrated in fewer hands.[66]The classic example wasHugo Stinnes,who earned the title of Inflation King by taking advantage of its effects on debt to amass controlling interests in 1,535 businesses with 2,890 different plants by 1924.[103]Stinnes' empire collapsed after the government-sponsored inflation was stopped by the introduction of theRentenmarkon 15 November 1923. One U.S. dollar was equivalent to 4.20 Rentenmarks; the exchange rate was 1 Rentenmark to one trillion paper marks. The new money was backed by the Reich's gold reserves along with a 3.2 billion Rentenmark mortgage on the land holdings of agriculture, industry and trade. The introduction of the Rentenmark was successful at stabilizing German currency and the economy.[104]
Additional political violence and the Hitler putsch
editWith the proclamation on 21 October 1923 of theRhenish Republiccame a short-lived secessionist movement in the wake of which sections of the labour force became increasingly radicalized. InSaxonyandThuringia,Communists won enough seats to participate in governments under Social Democratic minister presidents. In both states the Communists were expelled byReich executions(Reichsexekutionen) usingArticle 48of the Weimar Constitution. In the Reichstag, the Social Democrats withdrew their support from Cuno's government and entered agrand coalitionunder DVP Chancellor Gustav Stresemann.[105]
The nationalist right, especially in Bavaria, branded the breaking off of the Ruhr resistance as treason. In a breach of the Weimar constitution, Bavaria declared a state of emergency, and executive power was transferred toGustav Ritter von Kahras state commissioner general. The Reichswehr under the Chief of Army Command, GeneralHans von Seeckt,who had his own governmental ambitions directed against left-wing parties and Weimar parliamentarism,[106]behaved loyally towards the Stresemann government only with respect to his own interests. In spite of the moves against the governments in Saxony and Thuringia, no action was taken against Bavaria, where Kahr was preparing a military coup aimed at overthrowing the Reich government in cooperation with the Bavarian military under district commanderOtto von Lossow.[107]
In 1920 theGerman Workers' Partyhad become theNational Socialist German Workers' Party(NSDAP), orNazi Party,which would eventually become a driving force in the collapse of the Weimar Republic.Adolf Hitlernamed himself chairman of the party in July 1921. On 8 November 1923, in a pact withErich Ludendorff,a league of nationalist fighting societies called theKampfbund,took over a meeting that Kahr and Lossow were holding at a beer hall in Munich. Ludendorff and Hitler declared that the Weimar government was deposed and that they were planning to take control of Munich the following day. Kahr and Lossow organized the resistance to Hitler, with the result that thecoup attemptwas easily stopped.[108]Hitler was arrested and sentenced to five years in prison for high treason, the minimum sentence for the charge. He served less than eight months in a comfortable cell, receiving a daily stream of visitors until his release on 20 December 1924. While in jail Hitler dictatedMein Kampf,which laid out his ideas and future policies. Hitler decided to focus in the future on legal methods of gaining power.[109]
Golden Era (1924–1929)
editFrom 1924 to 1929, the Weimar Republic was relatively stable. Known in Germany as the "Goldene Zwanziger"(Golden Twenties), its prominent features were internal consolidation andrapprochementin foreign affairs, along with a growing economy and a consequent decrease in civil unrest, although the improvements came about without establishing a sustainable foundation for the parliamentary democracy. While Germany's recognition of its reparations obligations promoted reintegration into the contemporary state system and world markets, it also developed a strong dependence on American capital. The stability was partly borrowed and, in the end, only superficial.[110]
Framework for economic policy
editAn essential basis for the relative stabilisation was the restructuring of reparations through theDawes Plan.[111]Without fixing a final total sum, the plan regulated the scope, composition and the security of transfers for future annual reparations payments. The latter was to be guaranteed by the American financial expertParker Gilbertwho, as reparations agent, could directly influence German fiscal and financial policy in order to secure monetary stability. The acceptance of the Dawes Plan in the Reichstag had long been uncertain – parts of the Right spoke of a "new enslavement of the German people" and the KPD of the enslavement of the German proletariat.[99]Once the plan had been passed, it brought the Weimar Republic a significant inflow of American loans from state funds as well as private investors. The money served as both start-up financing for reparations and as aid for an economic revival. German railways, the National Bank and many industries were mortgaged as security for the loans.[112]
The economic consolidation that occurred after the period of hyperinflation was largely at the expense of wage earners and the economic middle class. The eight-hour day, one of the main social achievements of the 1918/19 revolution, was in many cases watered down or abandoned; the civil service was affected by massive job cuts and salary reductions; and rationalisation and concentration in large industries continued and deprived many small and medium-sized enterprises of their livelihoods. Savers and creditors who had been hurt by inflation were effectively left without any significant compensation.[113]
The declarations of social guarantees contained in the Weimar Constitution[114]had only a limited effect and stood in striking contrast to the many experiences of social decline. From 1924 onwards, small savers who had been impoverished or economically ruined by inflation were at least able to take advantage of the state-organised social welfare system, which replaced the former poor relief. The new system, however, was characterised by "petty means tests under an anonymous social bureaucracy" and by benefits that only secured existence at a subsistence level.[115]In the brief peak phase of overall economic recovery and economic optimism, unemployment insurance was introduced in 1927. In some respects it was the "high point of the Republic's social expansion", although it benefitted only a portion of the workforce and did not cover permanent unemployment.[116]In the meantime, the state had also introduced a new system of social security.
The parliamentary system of Weimar democracy was the expression of a party landscape that was strongly characterised and fragmented by class and social milieus. Reichstag members as representatives of the interests of their respective electorates often had narrow limits to their willingness to compromise. Such class and status consciousness was part of the legacy of the imperial era and continued to have an effect, although it was also partly reshaped by a consumer and leisure-oriented mass culture that emerged in the 1920s and was driven by the new media forms of records, film and radio. People of all classes and strata went to the cinema or sat in front of the radio. Mass culture pointed in the direction of democratisation and was interpreted by conservatives as intellectual flattening and a decline in values. The class fronts were gradually softened by mass culture, marking a "class society in transition".[117]
Unstable political system
editAfter Reich President Ebert died at the beginning of 1925 at the age of 54, the candidate of the parties that supported the Republic,Wilhelm Marxof the Centre Party, was defeated in the second round of the1925 Reich presidential electionby the candidate of the nationalist right,Paul von Hindenburg,48.3% to 45.3%. Despite the fact that Hindenburg had declared in advance that he intended to hold office in accordance with the Weimar Constitution,[118]his electoral success showed how far the country had shifted to the right since Weimar's beginnings with a socialist president.
The Reichstag elections inMay 1924andDecember 1924were once again failures for theWeimar Coalition(SDP, DDP and Centre), which had started so comfortably in 1919 and which maintained its position as a "bulwark of democracy" only in Prussia.[119]In the May election, the Coalition partners lost a total of 13 seats, while the right wing DNVP and left wing KPD picked up 82 seats. After the SPD leftGustav Stresemann's cabinet in November 1923 in protest of the Reich executions against Saxony and Thuringia, it did not take part in a government again until June 1928. From 1924 to 1928, there were three chancellors:Wilhelm Marxof the Centre party (twice), the non-partisanHans LutherandHermann Müllerof the SPD. Altogether there were seven cabinets under the three men.
Foreign policy
edit
Despite the frequent changes of personnel in the Reich chancellery and in the government cabinets between 1923 and 1928, there was nevertheless an effective constant in Foreign MinisterGustav Stresemannof theGerman People's Party.With his change from "monarchist of the heart" to "republican of reason",[120]as he himself expressed it, Stresemann exercised a stabilising influence on the political development of the Republic not only as Reich chancellor in 1923 but throughout the entire period of his participation in government.
He sought a release from the restraints of the Treaty of Versailles exclusively by peaceful means and through mutual understanding, although without abandoning long-term revisionist intentions such as regaining the territory ceded to Poland. He took the initiative for the 1925Locarno Treaties,which settled Germany's western borders but left the issue of the eastern ones open. Through reaching an understanding with France and securing Germany an equal position in the League of Nations in 1926, he led the Weimar Republic out of isolation. Germany signed arbitration conventions with France and Belgium and arbitration treaties with Poland andCzechoslovakia,undertaking to refer any future disputes to an arbitration tribunal or to thePermanent Court of International Justice.[121]As a result of the Dawes Plan, foreign troops left the Ruhr in 1925.[122]In addition, the 1926Treaty of Berlinensured that relations with the Soviet Union remained unencumbered. Beginning in 1925 there was secret and illegal cooperation between the Reichswehr and theRed Army.Germany tested weapons in the Soviet Union that had been banned by the Treaty of Versailles, including aircraft, tanks and poison gas.[123]
The favourable effects expected from the Locarno Treaties were to a certain extent realized. The first Rhineland zone was vacated in 1925, Franco-German economic relations were expanded through agreements, and theMilitary Inter-Allied Commission of Control,which monitored German disarmament, left Germany in 1927. In 1928 Stresemann played an important mediating role between the USA and France in the negotiations on theKellogg–Briand Pact,an international agreement on peace.[124]
After the full reparations schedule under the Dawes Plan was drawn up in 1928/29, new negotiations took place. In the resultingYoung Plan,the question of possible relief was combined with a plan for the final settlement of the reparations question. Instead of the annual payment of 2.5 billion Reichsmarks envisaged in the Dawes Plan, an average of 2 billion – initially 1.7 billion – was to be paid over a period of 59 years. With the prospect of what was thought to be a final reparations plan, and in view of Germany's willingness to accept the liability until 1988, France in parallel negotiations conceded a withdrawal of troops from the occupied Rhineland five years earlier than under the Versailles Treaty. For the nationalist right in Germany, it was above all the reparations burden extending across generations that provided propaganda fuel for their agitation against the Weimar Republic. The DNVP and Nazi Party carried out areferendum against the Young Plan,which failed by a large margin due to the low turnout, but through it the National Socialists were able to use their propaganda to draw nationwide attention to themselves and to make their mark on the right-wing fringe of the party spectrum.[125]
Culture
editThe 1920s saw a remarkable cultural renaissance in Germany. During the worst phase of hyperinflation in 1923, the clubs and bars were full of speculators who spent their daily profits so they would not lose the value the following day. Berlin intellectuals responded by condemning the excesses of what they considered capitalism and demanding revolutionary changes on the cultural scenery.
Influenced by the cultural explosion in the Soviet Union, German literature, cinema, theatre and musical works entered a phase of great creativity. Innovative street theatre brought plays to the public, and thecabaretscene and jazz bands became very popular. According to the cliché, modern young women wereAmericanized,wearing makeup, short hair, smoking and breaking with traditionalmores.The euphoria surroundingJosephine Bakerin the metropolis of Berlin for instance, where she was declared an "eroticgoddess"and in many ways admired and respected, kindled further" ultramodern "sensations in the minds of the German public.[126]Art and a new type of architecture taught at "Bauhaus"schools reflected the new ideas of the time, with artists such asGeorge Groszbeing fined for defaming the military and forblasphemy.
Artists in Berlin were influenced by other contemporary progressive cultural movements, such as the Impressionist and Expressionist painters in Paris, as well as the Cubists. Likewise, American progressive architects were admired. Many of the new buildings built during this era followed a straight-lined, geometrical style. Examples of the new architecture include theBauhaus BuildingbyGropius,Grosses Schauspielhaus,and theEinstein Tower.[127]
Not everyone, however, was happy with the changes taking place inWeimar culture.Conservatives and reactionaries feared that Germany was betraying its traditional values by adopting popular styles from abroad, particularly those Hollywood was popularising in American films, while New York became the global capital of fashion.
In 1929, three years after receiving the 1926Nobel Peace Prize,Stresemann died of a heart attack at age 51. When theNew York Stock Exchangecrashed in October 1929, American loans dried up and the sharp decline of the German economy brought the "Golden Twenties" to an abrupt end.
Social policy under Weimar
editA wide range of progressive social reforms were carried out during and after the revolutionary period. The Executive Council of the Workers' and Soldiers' Councils – a coalition that included Majority Social Democrats, Independent Social Democrats, workers and soldiers – introduced the eight-hour work day, reinstated demobilised workers, released political prisoners, abolished press censorship, increased workers' old-age, sick and unemployment benefits, and gave labour the unrestricted right to organise into unions.[128]It was made harder for estates to sack workers and prevent them from leaving when they wanted to. Under the Provisional Act for Agricultural Labour of 23 November 1918, the normal period of notice for management and most resident labourers was set at six weeks. In addition, a supplementary directive of December 1918 specified that female and child workers were entitled to a fifteen-minute break if they worked between four and six hours, thirty minutes for workdays lasting six to eight hours, and one hour for longer days.[129]A decree on 23 December 1918 established committees (composed of workers' representatives "in their relation to the employer" ) to safeguard the rights of workers. The right to bargain collectively was also established, while it was made obligatory "to elect workers' committees on estates and establish conciliation committees". A decree on 3 February 1919 removed the right of employers to acquire exemption for domestic servants and agricultural workers.[130]In 1919, legislation provided for a maximum working 48-hour workweek, restrictions on night work, a half-holiday on Saturday, and a break of thirty-six hours of continuous rest during the week.[131]
With the decree of 3 February 1919, the Ebert government reintroduced the original structure of the health insurance boards according to an 1883 law, with one-third employers and two-thirds workers.[132]As of 28 June 1919, health insurance committees were elected by the workers themselves.[133]That same year, health insurance was extended to wives and daughters without their own income, people only partially capable of gainful employment, people employed in private cooperatives, and people employed in public cooperatives.[134]
The Provisional Order of January 1919 concerning agricultural labour conditions fixed 2,900 hours as a maximum per year, distributed as eight, ten, and eleven hours per day in four month periods.[135]A code of January 1919 bestowed on land labourers the same legal rights that industrial workers enjoyed, while a bill ratified the same year obligated the states to set up agricultural settlement associations which "were endowed with the priority right of purchase of farms beyond a specified size".[136]
A series of progressive tax reforms were introduced under the auspices of Matthias Erzberger, including increases in taxes on capital[137]and an increase in the highest income tax rate from 4% to 60%.[138]Under a governmental decree of 3 February 1919, the German government met the demand of the veterans' associations that all aid for the disabled and their dependents be taken over by the central government[139](thus assuming responsibility for this assistance) and extended into peacetime the nationwide network of state and district welfare bureaus that had been set up during the war to coordinate social services for war widows and orphans.[140]
The Youth Welfare Act of 1922 obliged all municipalities and states to set up youth offices in charge of child protection, and also codified a right to education for all children,[141]while laws were passed to regulate rents and increase protection for tenants in 1922 and 1923.[142]Health insurance coverage was extended to other categories of the population during the existence of the Weimar Republic, including seamen, people employed in the educational and social welfare sectors, and all primary dependents.[134]Various improvements were also made in unemployment benefits, although in June 1920 the maximum amount of unemployment benefit that a family of four could receive in Berlin, 90 marks, was well below the minimum cost of subsistence of 304 marks.[143]
In 1923, unemployment relief was consolidated into a regular programme of assistance following economic problems that year. In 1924, a modern public assistance programme was introduced, and in 1925 the accident insurance programme was reformed, allowing diseases that were linked to certain kinds of work to become insurable risks. In addition, a national unemployment insurance programme was introduced in 1927.[144]Housing construction was also greatly accelerated during the Weimar period, with over 2 million new homes constructed between 1924 and 1931 and a further 195,000 modernised.[145]
Renewed crisis and decline (1930–1933)
editOnset of the Great Depression
edit
In 1929, the onset of theGreat Depressionproduced a severe economic shock in Germany which was made worse by theEuropean banking crisis of 1931.Germany's fragile economy had been sustained by the granting of loans through theDawes Plan(1924) and theYoung Plan(1929).[97]When American banks withdrew their line of credit to German companies, the rapid rise in unemployment could not be checked by conventional economic measures.[147]Unemployment thereafter grew dramatically, to 4 million in 1930,[148]and in theReichstag election of September 1930,theNational Socialist German Workers' Party(NSDAP), until then a minor far-right party, increased its share of the votes to 19%, becoming Germany's second largest party, while theCommunist Party of Germany(KPD) gained 23 seats. The shift to the political extremes made the unstable coalition system by which every Weimar chancellor had governed increasingly unworkable. The last years of the Weimar Republic were marred by even more systemic political instability than previous years, and political violence increased. Four chancellors (Heinrich Brüning,Franz von Papen,Kurt von Schleicherand, from 30 January to 23 March 1933,Adolf Hitler) governed throughpresidential decreerather than parliamentary consultation.[97]It effectively rendered parliament powerless as a means of enforcing constitutionalchecks and balances.
Brüning and the first presidential cabinet (1930–1932)
editOn 29 March 1930, at the instigation of GeneralKurt von Schleicher,PresidentPaul von Hindenburgappointed finance expertHeinrich Brüningas successor to Hermann Müller (SPD),[149]whose five-party coalition had broken down on 27 March over how to finance the increased costs of unemployment compensation. The new government was expected to lead a political shift towards conservatism.
As Brüning had no majority support in the Reichstag, he became, through the use ofthe emergency powers granted to the Reich president by Article 48of theconstitution,the first Weimar chancellor to operate independently of parliament.[6]After a bill to reform Germany's finances was opposed by the Reichstag, it was made into an emergency decree by Hindenburg. On 18 July, as a result of opposition from the SPD,KPD,DNVPand the small contingent ofNSDAPmembers, the Reichstag again rejected the bill by a slim margin. Immediately afterward, Brüning submitted a decree from the President to dissolve the Reichstag.[150]The consequentgeneral election on 14 Septemberresulted in an enormous political shift within the Reichstag: 18.3% of the vote went to the NSDAP, five times the percentage it had won in 1928.[151]As a result, it was no longer possible, even with agrand coalition,to form a pro-republican majority that excluded the KPD, DNVP and NSDAP. The situation led an increase in the number of public demonstrations and instances of paramilitary violence organised by the NSDAP.
Between 1930 and 1932, Brüning enacted a policy ofdeflationanddrastic cuts in state expenditures.[6]Among other measures, he completely halted all obligatory public payments to the unemployment insurance program introduced in 1927, resulting in higher contributions from the workers and fewer benefits for the unemployed. Benefits for the sick, invalids and pensioners were also sharply reduced.[152]He triggered a deflationaryinternal devaluationby forcing the economy to reduce prices, rents, salaries and wages by 20%[10]since theYoung Plandid not allow theReichsmarkto be devalued.
By late 1931 Hindenburg and Schleicher had begun to contemplate dropping Brüning in favour of accommodatingAlfred Hugenbergof the DNVP and Adolf Hitler. On 30 May 1932, Brüning finally lost Hindenburg's support over the question ofEastern Aidand resigned as chancellor.
The consensus today is that Brüning's policies exacerbated the German economic crisis and the population's growing frustration with democracy, contributing considerably to the increase in support for Hitler's NSDAP.[6]
Papen cabinet
editHindenburg then appointedFranz von Papenas the new chancellor. He was closely associated with the industrialist and land-owning classes and the military. GeneralKurt von Schleicher– who himself became Reichswehr minister – handpicked the members of thePapen cabinet,which came to be known as the "Cabinet of Barons".[153]It continued to govern by presidential decree as had the Brüning cabinets.
On 16 June Papen lifted the ban on the NaziSturmabteilung(SA) andSchutzstaffel(SS)[154]that had been imposed on 13 April under the Brüning government.[155]Using the political violence that took place during the Reichstag election campaign as a pretext, he ousted the SPD-led coalition government ofPrussiain thePrussian coup d'état(Preußenschlag) of 20 July. By emergency decree he declared himself Reich Commissioner (Reichskommissar) of Prussia, a step that further weakened the democracy of the Weimar Republic.[156]
Elections of July 1932
editPer a prior agreement with Hindenburg and Hitler, Papen had dissolved the Reichstag on 4 June 1932 and called for new elections in the hope that the Nazi Party would win the most seats and allow him to set up an authoritarian government.[157]The general elections on 31 July 1932yielded major gains for theCommunist Partyand the Nazis, who won 37.3% of the vote, theirhigh-water mark in a free election.The Nazi party supplanted theSocial Democratsas the largest party in the Reichstag, although it did not gain a majority.
The immediate question was what part the Nazi Party would play in the government of the country. Hitler refused a ministry under Papen and demanded the chancellorship for himself but was rejected by Hindenburg on 13 August 1932. Since there was still no majority in the Reichstag for any government, the Reichstag was again dissolved, and elections took place in the hope that a stable majority would result.[97]
Schleicher cabinet
editThe 6 November 1932 electionsyielded 33% for the Nazis,[158]two million voters fewer than in the previous election. Kurt von Schleicher forced Franz von Papen to resign and himself succeeded Papen as chancellor on 3 December.[159]Schleicher, a retired army officer, had developed in an atmosphere of semi-obscurity and intrigue that encompassed the Republican military policy. He had for years been in the camp of those supporting the Conservative counter-revolution. Schleicher's bold and unsuccessful plan was to build a majority in theReichstagby uniting the trade unionist left wings of the various parties, including that of the Nazis led byGregor Strasser.This policy did not prove successful either.
In this brief Presidential Dictatorship intermission, Schleicher assumed the role of "Socialist General" and entered into relations with the Christian Trade Unions, the relatively left of the Nazi party, and even with the Social Democrats. Schleicher planned for a sort of labour government under his Generalship. But theReichswehrofficers were not prepared for this, the working class had a natural distrust of their future allies, and the great capitalists and landowners also did not like the plans.
Hitler learned from Papen that the general had not received from Hindenburg the authority to abolish theReichstagparliament, whereas any majority of seats did. The cabinet (under a previous interpretation of Article 48) ruled without a sittingReichstag,which could vote only for its own dissolution. Hitler also learned that all past crippling Nazi debts were to be relieved by German big business.
On 22 January, Hitler's efforts to persuadeOskar von Hindenburg,the President's son and confidant, included threats to bring criminal charges over estate taxation irregularities at the President's Neudeck estate; although 5,000 acres (20 km2) extra were soon allotted to Hindenburg's property. Outmaneuvered by Papen and Hitler on plans for the new cabinet, and having lost Hindenburg's confidence, Schleicher asked for new elections. On 28 January, Papen described Hitler toPaul von Hindenburgas only a minority part of an alternative, Papen-arranged government. The four great political movements, the SPD, Communists,Centre,and the Nazis were in opposition.
On 29 January, Hitler and Papen thwarted a last-minute threat of an officially sanctionedReichswehrtakeover, and on 30 January 1933 Hindenburg accepted the new Papen-Nationalist-Hitler coalition, with the Nazis holding only three of eleven Cabinet seats: Hitler as Chancellor,Wilhelm Frickas Minister of the Interior andHermann Göringas Minister Without Portfolio. Later that day, the first cabinet meeting was attended by only two political parties, representing a minority in theReichstag:The Nazis and theGerman National People's Party(DNVP), led byAlfred Hugenberg,with 196 and 52 seats respectively. Eyeing the CatholicCentre Party's 70 (plus 20BVP) seats, Hitler refused their leader's demands for constitutional "concessions" (amounting to protection) and planned for dissolution of theReichstag.
Hindenburg, despite his misgivings about the Nazis' goals and about Hitler as a personality, reluctantly agreed to Papen's theory that, with Nazi popular support on the wane, Hitler could now be controlled as Chancellor. This date, dubbed by the Nazis as theMachtergreifung(seizure of power), is commonly seen as the beginning ofNazi Germany.
End of the Weimar Republic
editHitler's chancellorship (1933)
editHitler was sworn in asChancelloron the morning of 30 January 1933 in what some observers later described as a brief and indifferent ceremony. By early February, a mere week after Hitler's assumption of the chancellorship, the government had begun to clamp down on the opposition. Meetings of the left-wing parties were banned and even some of the moderate parties found their members threatened and assaulted. Measures with an appearance of legality suppressed the Communist Party in mid-February and included the plainly illegal arrests ofReichstagdeputies.
On 27 February 1933 theReichstag was gutted by fire,which was blamed on an act of arson by Dutchcouncil communistMarinus van der Lubbe.Hitler blamed the fire on the KPD (though Van der Lubbe was not a member of the party) and convinced Hindenburg to issue theReichstag Fire Decreethe following day. The decree invokedArticle 48of theWeimar Constitutionand "indefinitely suspended" a number of constitutional protections of civil liberties, allowing the Nazi government to take swift action against political meetings, arresting and killing the Communists.
Hitler and the Nazis exploited the German state's broadcasting and aviation facilities in a massive attempt to sway the electorate, but this election yielded a scant majority of 16 seats for the NSDAP-DNVP coalition. At theReichstagelections,which took place on 5 March 1933, the NSDAP obtained 17 million votes. The Communist, Social Democrat and Catholic Centre votes stood firm. This was the last multi-party election of the Weimar Republic and the last multi-party all-German election for 57 years.
Hitler addressed disparate interest groups, stressing the necessity for a definitive solution to the perpetual instability of the Weimar Republic. He now blamed Germany's problems on the Communists, even threatening their lives on 3 March. Former ChancellorHeinrich Brüningproclaimed that his Centre Party would resist any constitutional change and appealed to the President for an investigation of theReichstagfire. Hitler's successful plan was to induce what remained of the now Communist-depleted Reichstag to grant him, and the Government, the authority to issue decrees with the force of law. The hitherto Presidential Dictatorship hereby was to give itself a new legal form.
On 15 March, the firstcabinet meetingwas attended by the two coalition parties, representing a minority in theReichstag:the Nazis and theDNVPled byAlfred Hugenberg(288 + 52 seats). According to theNuremberg Trials,this cabinet meeting's first order of business was how at last to achieve the complete counter-revolution by means of the constitutionally allowedEnabling Act,requiring a 66% parliamentary majority. This Act would, and did, lead Hitler and theNSDAPtoward his goal of unfettered dictatorial powers.[160]
Hitler cabinet meeting in mid-March
editAt the cabinet meeting on 15 March, Hitler introduced theEnabling Act,which would have authorised the cabinet to enact legislation without the approval of theReichstag.Meanwhile, the only remaining question for the Nazis was whether the CatholicCentre Partywould support the Enabling Act in theReichstag,thereby providing the2⁄3majority required to ratify a law that amended the constitution. Hitler expressed his confidence to win over the Centre's votes. Hitler is recorded at the Nuremberg Trials as being sure of eventual Centre Party Germany capitulation and thus rejecting of the DNVP's suggestions to "balance" the majority through further arrests, this time of Social Democrats. Hitler, however, assured his coalition partners that arrests would resume after the elections and, in fact, some 26 Social Democrats were physically removed. After meeting with Centre leader MonsignorLudwig Kaasand other Centre Trade Union leaders daily and denying them a substantial participation in the government, negotiation succeeded in respect of guarantees towards Catholic civil-servants and education issues.
At the last internal Centre meeting prior to the debate on the Enabling Act, Kaas expressed no preference or suggestion on the vote, but as a way of mollifying opposition by Centre members to the granting of further powers to Hitler, Kaas somehow arranged for a letter of constitutional guarantee from Hitler himself prior to his voting with the Centreen blocin favour of theEnabling Act.This guarantee was not ultimately given. Kaas, the party's chairman since 1928, had strong connections to theVaticanSecretary of State, laterPope Pius XII.In return for pledging his support for the act, Kaas would use his connections with the Vatican to set in train and draft theHoly See's long desiredReichskonkordatwith Germany (only possible with the co-operation of the Nazis).
Ludwig Kaas is considered along with Papen as being one of the two most important political figures in the creation of theNazi regime.[161]
Enabling Act negotiations
editOn 20 March, negotiation began between Hitler and Frick on one side and the CatholicCentre Party(Zentrum) leaders—Kaas, Stegerwald, and Hackelsburger on the other. The aim was to settle on conditions under which Centre would vote in favour of theEnabling Act.Because of the Nazis' narrow majority in theReichstag,the Centre's support was necessary to receive the required two-thirds majority vote. On 22 March, the negotiations concluded; Hitler promised to continue the existence of the German states, agreed not to use the new grant of power to change the constitution, and promised to retain Centre Party members in the civil service. Hitler also pledged to protect the Catholic confessional schools and to respect the concordats signed between theHoly SeeandBavaria(1924),Prussia(1929), andBaden(1931). Hitler also agreed to mention these promises in his speech to theReichstagbefore the vote on the Enabling Act.
The ceremonial opening of theReichstagon 21 March was held at theGarrison ChurchinPotsdam,a shrine ofPrussianism,in the presence of manyJunkerlandowners and representatives of the imperial military caste. This impressive and often emotional spectacle – orchestrated byJoseph Goebbels– aimed to link Hitler's government with Germany's imperial past and portray Nazism as a guarantor of the nation's future. The ceremony helped convince the "old guard" Prussian military elite of Hitler's homage to their long tradition and, in turn, produced the relatively convincing view that Hitler's government had the support of Germany's traditional protector – the Army. Such support would publicly signal a return to conservatism to curb the problems affecting the Weimar Republic, and that stability might be at hand. In a cynical and politically adroit move, Hitler bowed in apparently respectful humility before President and Field MarshalHindenburg.
Passage of the Enabling Act
editTheReichstagconvened on 23 March 1933 at theKroll Opera House,and in the midday opening, Hitler made a historic speech, appearing outwardly calm and conciliatory. Hitler presented an appealing prospect of respect towards Christianity by paying tribute to the Christian faiths as "essential elements for safeguarding the soul of the German people". He promised to respect their rights and declared that his government's "ambition is a peaceful accord betweenChurch and State"and that he hoped" to improve [their] friendly relations with theHoly See".This speech aimed especially at the future recognition by the named Holy See and therefore to the votes of the Centre Party addressing many concerns Kaas had voiced during the previous talks. Kaas is considered to have had a hand therefore in the drafting of the speech.[161]Kaas is also reported as voicing the Holy See's desire for Hitler as bulwark againstatheisticRussiannihilismpreviously as early as May 1932.[162]
Hitler promised that the Act did not threaten the existence of either theReichstagor theReichsrat,that the authority of the President remained untouched and that thestateswould not be abolished. During an adjournment, the other parties (notably the Centre) met to discuss their intentions.[163]
In the debate prior to the vote on the Enabling Act, Hitler orchestrated the full political menace of his paramilitary forces like theStorm Troopersin the streets to intimidate reluctantReichstagdeputies into approving the Enabling Act. The Communists' 81 seats had been empty since theReichstagFire Decree and other lesser known procedural measures, thus excluding their anticipated "No" votes from the balloting.Otto Wels,the leader of the Social Democrats, whose seats were similarly depleted from 120 to below 100, was the only speaker to defend democracy and in a futile but brave effort to deny Hitler the2⁄3majority, he made a speech critical of the abandonment of democracy to dictatorship. At this, Hitler could no longer restrain his wrath.[164]
In his retort to Wels, Hitler abandoned earlier pretence at calm statesmanship and delivered a characteristic screaming diatribe, promising to exterminate all Communists in Germany and threatening Wels' Social Democrats as well. He did not even want their support for the bill. "Germany will become free, but not through you," he shouted.[165]Meanwhile, Hitler's promised written guarantee to Monsignor Kaas was being typed up, it was asserted to Kaas, and thereby Kaas was persuaded to silently deliver the Centre bloc's votes for the Enabling Act anyway. The Act – formally titled the "Act for the Removal of Distress from People and Reich" – was passed by a vote of 444 to 94. Only the SPD had voted against the Act. Every other member of theReichstag,whether from the largest or the smallest party, voted in favour of the Act. It went into effect the following day, 24 March.
Consequences
editThe passage of theEnabling Act of 1933is widely considered to mark the end of the Weimar Republic and the beginning of the Nazi era. It empowered the cabinet to legislate without the approval of the Reichstag or the President, and to enact laws that were contrary to the constitution. Before the March 1933 elections, Hitler had persuaded Hindenburg to promulgate theReichstag Fire DecreeusingArticle 48,which empowered the government to restrict "the rights of habeas corpus [...] freedom of the press, the freedom to organise and assemble, the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications" and legalised search warrants and confiscation "beyond legal limits otherwise prescribed". This was intended to forestall any action against the government by the Communists. Hitler used the provisions of the Enabling Act to pre-empt possible opposition to his dictatorship from other sources, in which he was mostly successful: in the months following the passage of the Enabling Act, all German parties aside from the NSDAP were banned or forced to disband themselves, all trade unions were dissolved and all media were brought under the control of theReich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda(with the partial exception of theFrankfurter Zeitung). The Reichstag was then dissolved by Hindenburg anda snap one-party election was calledin November 1933, giving the NSDAP full control of the chamber.
The constitution of 1919 was never formally repealed, but the Enabling Act meant that it was a dead letter. The Reichstag was effectively eliminated as an active player in German politics. It only met sporadically until the end ofWorld War II,held no debates and enacted only a few laws; for all purposes, it wasreduced to a mere stage for Hitler's speeches.The other chamber of the German parliament (theReichsrat) was officially abolished on 14 February 1934 by the "Law on the Abolition of the Reichsrat";this decision was in clear violation of the Enabling Act, which stipulated that any laws passed under its authority could not affect the institutions of either chamber. By this time, however, the Nazis had become law unto themselves, and these actions were never challenged in court.
On 2 August 1934, Hindenburg died from lung cancer, thus eliminating any remaining obstacle to Nazi full dominance; the day before his death, the Hitler Cabinet passed the "Law Concerning the Head of State of the German Reich"that transferred the President's powers upon his death, including as Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, to the new post of"Führerand Reich Chancellor ", giving Hitler complete power over all the Reich without any possibility of checks and balances. This action was later ratified bya highly non-democratic referendum.This, along with theremilitarization of the Rhinelandin 1936 shed the last remains of the Weimar Republic.
Reasons for failure
editThis sectionneeds additional citations forverification.(June 2021) |
The reasons for the Weimar Republic's collapse are the subject of continuing debate. It may have been doomed from the beginning since even some moderates disliked it and extremists on both the left and right loathed it, a situation often referred to as a "democracy without democrats".[166]Germany had limited democratic traditions, and Weimar democracy was widely seen as chaotic. Since Weimar's early left of center politicians had been blamed for theDolchstoß( "stab-in-the-back"), a widely believed theory that Germany's surrender in the First World War had been unnecessary and the act of traitors, the popular legitimacy of the government was on shaky ground from the start. As normal parliamentary lawmaking broke down and was replaced around 1930 by a series ofemergency decrees,the decreasing popular legitimacy of the government further drove voters to extremist parties.[167]
No single reason can explain the failure of the Weimar Republic. The most commonly asserted causes can be grouped into three categories: economic problems, institutional problems, and the roles of specific individuals.[168]
Economic problems
editThe Weimar Republic had some of the most serious economic problems ever experienced by any Western democracy. It experienced a period of rampanthyperinflation,sometimes high unemployment, and a large drop in living standards. From 1923 to 1929, there was a period of economic recovery, but theGreat Depressionof the 1930s led to a worldwide recession. Germany was particularly affected because it depended heavily on American loans.
The Weimar Republic was severely affected by the Great Depression. In 1926, about two million Germans were unemployed, which rose to around six million in 1932, with many blaming the Weimar Republic. As the Weimar Republic was very fragile throughout its existence, the depression was devastating and played a major role in theNazitakeover.
Most Germans thought theTreaty of Versailleswas a punishing and degrading document because it forced them to surrender resource-rich areas and pay massive amounts of compensation. The punitive reparations caused consternation and resentment, but the actual economic damage resulting from the Treaty of Versailles is difficult to determine. While the official reparations were considerable, Germany ended up paying only a fraction of them. However, the reparations damaged Germany's economy by discouraging market loans. A number of factors came together in 1923, including printing currency to finance the costs of passive resistance to theoccupation of the Ruhr,to cause rampant hyperinflation. At the beginning of 1920, one US dollar was equivalent to fifty marks. By the end of 1923, one US dollar was equal to 4,200,000,000,000 marks.[169]PrincetonhistorianHarold Jamesargues that there was a clear link between economic decline and people turning to extremist politics.[170]That was made apparent when political parties on both the far right and far left wanted to disband the Republic altogether, making any democratic majority in Parliament impossible.[168]
Institutional problems
editIt is widely believed that the1919 constitutionhad several weaknesses, making the eventual establishment of a dictatorship likely, but it is impossible to know whether a different constitution could have prevented the rise of the Nazi party.[167]The 1949 West German constitution (theBasic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany) is generally viewed as a strong response to these flaws.
- The Weimar presidency was frequently considered anErsatzkaiser( "substitute emperor" ), an attempt to replace the emperors with a similarly strong institution meant to diminish party politics.Article 48of the Constitution gave the president power to "take all necessary steps" if "public order and security are seriously disturbed or endangered". Although it was intended as an emergency clause, it was often used before 1933 to issue decrees without the support of Parliament and also made Hitler'sGleichschaltungeasier.
- During the Weimar Republic, it was accepted that a law did not have to conform to the constitution as long as it had the support of two-thirds of Parliament, the same majority needed to change the constitution. That was a precedent for theEnabling Act of 1933.The Basic Law of 1949 requires an explicit change of the wording, and it prohibits abolishing the basic rights or the federal structure of the republic.
- The use of aproportional representationwithout largethresholdsmeant a party with a small amount of support could gain entry into the Reichstag. That led to many small parties, some extremist, building political bases within the system, and made it difficult to form and maintain a stablecoalition government,further contributing to instability. To counter the problem, the modern German Bundestag introduced a 5% threshold limit for a party to gain parliamentary representation. However, the Reichstag of the monarchy was fractioned to a similar degree even if it was elected bymajority vote(under atwo-round system).
- The Reichstag could remove the chancellor from office even if it was unable to agree on a successor. With the Reichstag increasingly fractured, President Hindenburg rather than the Reichstag chose the Republic's last four chancellors (Brüning, Papen, Schleicher and Hitler). They all governed by presidential decree. The 1949 Basic Law stipulates that a chancellor may not be removed by Parliament unless a successor is elected at the same time, a procedure known as a "constructive vote of no confidence".
- The fundamental rights ofhabeas corpus,sanctity of the home, inviolability of the mail,freedom of speechand thepress,freedom of assembly,freedom of association(including religious associations) and the inviolability of property – Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124 and 153 of the Weimar Constitution – could be suspended under Article 48.[171]TheBasic Lawlists them as basic rights that cannot legally be nullified and in Article 20 (4) includes theright to resistattempts to abolish the constitutional order.[172]
Role of individuals and parties
editChancellorHeinrich Brüning's deflationary economic policy from 1930 to 1932 has been the subject of much debate. It caused many Germans to identify the Republic with cuts in social spending.
Franz von Papen,who was chancellor of Germany from 30 May to 17 November 1932, ousted the elected government of theFree State of Prussiain the1932 Prussian coup d'état,which eliminated one of the last potential bastions of resistance to Hitler's seizure of power. Prussia was led by the Social Democratic Party, was home to the federal capital Berlin and had 61% of the Weimar Republic's population. Papen also pressured Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as chancellor and himself as vice chancellor in 1933 in a cabinet ostensibly not under Nazi Party domination. Papen and his allies were quickly marginalized by Hitler.
Paul von Hindenburgbecame president of Germany in 1925. As he was an old-style monarchist conservative, he had little love for the Republic, but for the most part, he acted formally within the bounds of the constitution.[173]However, he ultimately – on the advice of his son and others close to him – appointed Hitler chancellor, thereby effectively ending the Republic after the passage of theEnabling Act of 1933.Additionally, Hindenburg's death in 1934 ended the last obstacle for Hitler to assume full power in the Weimar Republic.
TheGerman National People's Party(DNVP) has also been blamed as responsible for the downfall of the Weimar Republic because of itsultranationalistpositions and its unwillingness to accept the Republic because of its monarchist ideology. In his book,The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich,journalist and historianWilliam L. Shirerwrote that the DNVP's status as a far-right party rather than a mainstream conservative party was one of the main reasons for the Weimar Republic's downfall. In Shirer's view, the DNVP's refusal to "take a responsible position either in the government or in the opposition" during most of Weimar's existence denied Weimar "that stability provided in many other countries by a truly conservative party."[174]Similarly, conservative British historian SirJohn Wheeler-Bennettblamed the DNVP for failing to reconcile with the Republic, stating that "Under the cloak of loyalty to the Monarchy, they either held aloof or sabotaged the efforts of successive Chancellors to give a stable government to the Republic. The truth is that after 1918 many German Nationalists were more influenced by feelings of disloyalty to the Republic than of loyalty to the Kaiser, and it was this motive which led them to make their fatal contribution to bringing Hitler to power".[175]
Legacy
editNazi propagandatended to describe the Weimar Republic as a period of treason, degeneration, and corruption. The whole period from 1918 to 1933 was described in propaganda as "The time of the System" (Systemzeit), while the Republic itself was known as "The System"(Das System), a term that was adopted into everyday use after 1933.[176]Another Nazi phrase used for the republic and its politicians was "theNovember criminals"or" the regime of the November criminals "(German:November-Verbrecher), referring to the month the republic was founded in (November 1918).[177]
According toForeign Policy,the Weimar Republic is seen as "the best-known historical example of a 'failed' democracy that ceded to fascism".[178]
Constituent states
editPrior to the First World War, the constituentstates of the German Empirewere 22 smaller monarchies, three republican city-states, and theImperial Territory of Alsace–Lorraine.After the territorial losses of theTreaty of Versaillesand the German Revolution of 1918–1919, the remaining states continued as republics. The formerErnestine duchiescontinued briefly as republics before merging to form the state ofThuringiain 1920, except forSaxe-Coburg,which became part ofBavaria.
 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These states were gradually abolished under the Nazi regime via theGleichschaltungprocess, whereby they were effectively replaced byGaue.There were two notablede jurechanges, however. At the end of 1933,Mecklenburg-Strelitzwas merged withMecklenburg-Schwerinto form a united Mecklenburg. Second, in April 1937, the city-state ofLübeckwas formally incorporated into Prussia by theGreater Hamburg Act,apparently motivated by Hitler's personal dislike for the city. Most of the remaining states were formally dissolved by theAlliesat the end of the Second World War and ultimately reorganised into the modernstates of Germany.
See also
edit
References
editExplanatory notes
edit- ^Kaliningrad Oblast
- ^Parts ofKlaipėda CountyandTauragė County
- ^Duivelsberg
- ^German:Weimarer Republik,[ˈvaɪmaʁɐʁepuˈbliːk]
- ^German:Deutsches Reich,lit. 'German Empire/Realm'
- ^German:Deutsche Republik
- ^While Germany fulfilled most of its treaty obligations, it never completely disarmed, and paid only a small portion of war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through theDawes Planand theYoung Plan).
- ^During the time of the Weimar Republic, terms such asPeople's Republicand/orPeople's Statewere used by republican movements across the political spectrum. It was only during and afterWorld War IIthat such terminology became more specifically associated with socialist and Communist regimes.
Citations
edit- ^Hosch, William L. (23 March 2007)."The Reichstag Fire and the Enabling Act of March 23, 1933".BritannicaBlog.Archived fromthe originalon 11 March 2019.Retrieved30 March2017.
- ^"The law that 'enabled' Hitler's dictatorship".DW.com.23 March 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 7 September 2019.Retrieved30 March2017.
- ^Mason, K. J.Republic to Reich: A History of Germany 1918–1945.McGraw-Hill.
- ^Winfried Klein (14 September 2012)."Wer sind wir, und was wollen wir dazu singen?".FAZ.NET.Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Retrieved4 August2022.
- ^Volume 6. Weimar Germany, 1918/19–1933 Population by Religious Denomination (1910–1939)Archived9 August 2016 at theWayback MachineSozialgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch, Volume III, Materialien zur Statistik des Deutschen Reiches 1914–1945, edited by Dietmar Petzina, Werner Abelshauser and Anselm Faust. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1978, p. 31. Translation: Fred Reuss.
- ^abcdThomas Adam,Germany and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History,2005,ISBN1-85109-633-7,p. 185
- ^ab"Das Deutsche Reich im Überblick".Wahlen in der Weimarer Republik.Archivedfrom the original on 21 November 2019.Retrieved26 April2007.
- ^"Kaiser Wilhelm II".history.com.August 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 10 October 2021.Retrieved10 October2021.
- ^Marks, Sally (1976).The Illusion of Peace: International Relations in Europe, 1918–1933,St. Martin's, New York, pp. 96–105.
- ^abBüttner, Ursula (2008).Weimar: die überforderte Republik.Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. p. 424.ISBN978-3-608-94308-5.
- ^"Weimar Republic".Encyclopedia Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on 3 May 2015.Retrieved29 June2012.
- ^"Verfassungen des Deutschen Reichs (1918–1933)"[Constitution of the German Reich (1918–1933)].Verfassungen der Welt(in German).Retrieved4 November2023.
- ^abSchnurr, Eva-Maria (30 September 2014)."Der Name des Feindes: Warum heißt die erste deutsche Demokratie eigentlich 'Weimarer Republik?'"[The Name of the Enemy: Why Was the First German Democracy Even Called the 'Weimar Republic'?].Der Spiegel(in German).Retrieved11 June2020.
- ^abcSebastian Ullrichas quoted inSchnurr 2014
- ^Richard J. Evans (2005).The Coming of the Third Reich.Penguin. p. 33.ISBN978-1-101-04267-0.
- ^"Constitution of the Weimar Republic".documentArchiv.de(in German). 11 August 1919. article 3.Archivedfrom the original on 27 November 2019.Retrieved24 February2008.
- ^ab– viaWikisource.
- ^Wirsching, Andreas (2000).Die Weimarer Republik. Politik und Gesellschaft[The Weimar Republic. Politics and Society] (in German). Munich: Oldenbourg. pp. 55 f.ISBN9783486587364.
- ^Kolb, Eberhard (2002).Die Weimarer Republik[The Weimar Republic] (in German) (6th ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg. p. 42.
- ^Llewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (5 November 2019)."Hans von Seeckt".Alpha History.Retrieved20 March2023.[permanent dead link]
- ^Wheeler-Bennett, John W. (1953).The Nemesis of Power(2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 92.ISBN978-1-4039-1812-3.
- ^Hamilton, Richard F. (2014).Who Voted for Hitler?.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 342.ISBN978-1400855346.
- ^Hansen, Ernst Willi (2007). "Der Staat im Staate – Militärgeschichte der Weimarer Republik 1919 bis 1933" [The State Within the State – Military History of the Weimar Republic 1919 to 1933]. In von Neugebauer, Karl-Volker (ed.).Grundkurs deutsche Militärgeschichte. Band 2. Das Zeitalter der Weltkriege: 1914 bis 1945. Völker in Waffen[Basic Course in German Military History. Volume 2: The Age of the World Wars: 1914 to 1945. Peoples in Arms] (in German). Munich: Oldenbourg. pp. 138–144.ISBN9783486580990.
- ^Hansen 2007,pp. 150–167.
- ^Mommsen, Hans (1997). "Militär und zivile Militarisierung in Deutschland 1914 bis 1938" [Military and Civil Militarization in Germany 1914 to 1938]. In Frevert, Ute (ed.).Militär und Gesellschaft im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert[Military and Society in the 19th and 20th Centuries] (in German). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. p. 273.
- ^"World War I – Killed, wounded, and missing".Encyclopedia Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on 5 October 2020.Retrieved7 January2021.
- ^Ellis, John (2001).The World War I Databook.London: Aurum Press. p. 269.ISBN9781854107664.
- ^Grebler, Leo (1940).The Cost of the World War to Germany and Austria-Hungary.New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 78.
- ^Vincent, C. Paul (1985).The Politics of Hunger: The Allied Blockade of Germany, 1915–1919.Athens (Ohio) and London: Ohio University Press.
- ^"The National Archives – Exhibitions & Learning online – First World War – Spotlights on history".Government of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 6 April 2018.Retrieved14 April2018.
{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^Herwig, Holger H. (1997).The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918.Modern Wars. London: St. Martin's Press. pp. 426–428.ISBN978-0-340-67753-7.OCLC34996156.
- ^Tucker, Spencer C. (2005).World War I: A–D.Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. p. 1256.ISBN978-1-85109-420-2.OCLC162257288.
- ^"Die Revolution von 1918/19".Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German). 15 August 2015.Retrieved23 March2023.
- ^Haffner, Sebastian (2002).Die deutsche Revolution 1918/19[The German Revolution 1918/19] (in German). Munich: Kindler. p. 90.ISBN3-463-40423-0.
- ^Stevenson, David (2004).Cataclysm: The First World War as Political Tragedy.New York: Basic Books. p. 404.ISBN978-0-465-08184-4.OCLC54001282.
- ^Haffner 2002,pp. 85–86.
- ^Winkler, Heinrich August (1993).Weimar 1919–1933 Die Geschichte der ersten deutschen Demokratie[Weimar 1919–1933 The History of the First German Democracy] (in German). Munich: C.H. Beck. p. 23.ISBN3-406-37646-0.
- ^Watson, Alexander (November 2008)."Stabbed at the Front".History Today.58(11).Archivedfrom the original on 13 June 2020.Retrieved13 June2020.(subscription required)
- ^Barth, Boris (8 October 2014). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Stab-in-the-back Myth".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved1 April2023.
- ^"The November revolution, 1918/1919"(PDF).Deutscher Bundestag.
- ^Conradt, David P. (2009).The German Polity.Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 5.ISBN978-0-547-15086-4.
- ^"The End of the Monarchy".bavarikon.Retrieved21 November2023.
- ^Urbach, Karina (13 July 2016). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Maximilian, Prince of Baden".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.
- ^Aulke, Julian (23 October 2017). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Noske, Gustav".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved18 April2024.
- ^Haffner 2002,p. 90.
- ^abSturm, Reinhard (23 December 2011)."Vom Kaiserreich zur Republik 1918/19"[From Empire to Republic 1918/19].Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung(in German).Retrieved31 March2023.
- ^Schaefer, Karen (2020).German Military and the Weimar Republic.Barnsley, South Yorkshire, England: Pen & Sword Books Limited. pp. viii.ISBN9781526764355.
- ^Altmann, Gerhard (11 April 2000)."Der Rat der Volksbeauftragten".Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved2 May2023.
- ^Kramer, Alan (22 January 2020). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Naval Blockade (of Germany)".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved1 April2023.
- ^"Der Reichskongress der Arbeiter- und Soldatenräte"[The Reich Congress of Workers' and Soldiers' Councils].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved31 March2023.
- ^"Ebert-Groener-Pakt".Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German). 15 August 2015.
- ^Head, Michael (2019).Domestic Military Powers, Law and Human Rights: Calling Out the Armed Forces.United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. pp. ebook.ISBN9781000754025.
- ^"Weihnachtskämpfe am Berliner Schloss"[Christmas Battles at the Berlin Palace].Bundesarchiv(in German).Retrieved31 March2023.
- ^William A. Pelz (2007).Against Capitalism: The European Left on the March.New York: Peter Lang. pp. 116–118.ISBN978-0-8204-6776-4.
- ^Longerich, Peter (1995).Deutschland 1918–1933. Die Weimarer Republik. Handbuch zur Geschichte(in German). Hanover: Fackelträger. p. 86.ISBN3-7716-2208-5.OCLC36280690.
- ^"Das Deutsche Reich Wahl zur Nationalversammlung 1919"[The German Reich Election to the National Assembly 1919].gonschior.de(in German).Retrieved2 May2023.
- ^"Weimar Republic".Britannica.Retrieved2 May2023.
- ^Bischel, Matthias (22 March 2019)."Räterepublik Baiern (1919)"[Bavarian Soviet Republic].Historisches Lexikon Bayerns(in German).Retrieved1 April2023.
- ^Scriba, Arnulf (2 September 2014)."Die Teilung Oberschlesiens"[The partition of Upper Silesia].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved2 May2023.
- ^Bane, S.L. (1942).The Blockade of Germany after the Armistice 1918–1919.Stanford University Press. p. 791.
- ^Howard, N. P. (1 April 1993)."The Social and Political Consequences of the Allied Food Blockade of Germany, 1918–19".German History.11(2): 161–188.doi:10.1093/gh/11.2.161.ISSN0266-3554.
- ^Heinzelmann, Ursula (2014).Beyond Bratwurst: A History of Food in Germany.London: Reaktion Books.ISBN9781780232720.
- ^Boldorf, Marcel (13 December 2021). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Post-war Economies (Germany)".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved16 April2023.
- ^Winkler, Heinrich August (1993).Weimar 1918–1933. Die erste deutsche Demokratie[Weimar 1918–1933. The First German Democracy] (in German). Munich: C.H. Becl. p. 143.ISBN3-406-37646-0.
- ^Winkler 1993,p. 145.
- ^abWinkler 1993,p. 244.
- ^Llewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (26 September 2019)."The hyperinflation of 1923".Alpha History.Retrieved18 April2023.
- ^McElligott, Anthony (25 February 2021). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Workers' or Revolutionary Councils".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved16 April2023.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^O'Neill, Aaron (21 June 2022)."Approximate German territorial losses, and related loss of resources, following the Treaty of Versailles, June 28, 1919".statista.Retrieved20 April2023.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^ab"The Treaty of Versailles".Britannica.Retrieved12 April2023.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^Schröder, Joachim; Watson, Alexander (23 June 2016). Daniel, Ute; Gatrell, Peter; Janz, Oliver; Jones, Heather; Keene, Jennifer; Kramer, Alan; Nasson, Bill (eds.)."Occupation during and after the War (Germany)".1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Freie Universität Berlin.Retrieved1 April2023.
- ^abc– viaWikisource.
- ^"Philipp Scheidemann gegen die Annahme des Versailler Vertrages (12. Mai 1919)"[Philipp Scheidemann Against Accepting the Versailles Treaty (12 May 1919)](PDF).Deutsche Geschichte in Dokumente und Bildern(in German). p. 3.Retrieved28 April2023.
- ^"Vor 100 Jahren: Nationalversammlung konstituiert sich in Weimar"[100 years ago: The National Assembly Meets in Weimar].Deutscher Bundestag(in German). 1919.Retrieved28 April2023.
- ^Ian, Kershaw (1998).Hitler 1889–1936: Hubris.London: Allen Lane. p. 136.ISBN0-393-04671-0.
- ^"Resentment towards the Treaty of Versailles".BBC.Retrieved27 April2023.
- ^Krüger, Peter (1993).Die Außenpolitik der Republik von Weimar[Foreign Policy of the Weimar Republic] (in German). Darmstadt: WBG Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. p. 63.ISBN3-534-07250-2.
- ^Geiss, Imanuel (1990).Der lange Weg in die Katastrophe. Die Vorgeschichte des Ersten Weltkrieges 1815–1914[The Long Road to Catastrophe. The background of the First World War 1815–1914] (in German). Munich: Piper. pp. 102 f.ISBN3-492-10943-8.
- ^"Parlamentarischer Untersuchungsausschuss für die Schuldfragen des Ersten Weltkriegs"[Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry into the Question of Guilt for the First World War].Kritische Online-Edition der Nuntiaturberichte Eugenio Pacellis (1917–1929)(in German).Retrieved20 May2023.
- ^"Gründung des Reichsarchivs 1919"[Founding of the Reich Archive 1919].Bundesarchiv(in German).Retrieved20 May2023.
- ^Scriba, Arnulf (2 September 2014)."Weimarer Republik: Außenpolitik"[Weimar Republic: Foreign Policy].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved19 May2023.
- ^Kimmel, Elke (12 January 2022)."Die" Kriegsschuldlüge ""[The 'War Guilt Lie'].Deutschlandfunk(in German).Retrieved19 May2023.
- ^"World War I: Aftermath – The Undermining of Democracy in Germany".Holocaust Encyclopedia.United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.Retrieved15 May2023.
- ^Harders, Levke (14 September 2014)."Wolfgang Kapp 1858–1922".Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved12 October2023.
- ^Winkler, Heinrich August (1998).Weimar 1918–1933. Die Geschichte der ersten deutschen Demokratie[Weimar 1918–1933. The History of the First German Democracy] (in German). Munich: C. H. Beck. p. 121.ISBN3-406-43884-9.
- ^Wulfert, Anja (22 January 2002)."Der Märzaufstand 1920"[The March Uprising 1920].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved14 May2023.
- ^Thoß, Bruno (11 September 202)."Kapp-Lüttwitz-Putsch, 1920".Historisches Lexikon Bayerns.Retrieved13 May2023.
- ^"Das Deutsche Reich: Reichstagswahl 1920/22"[The German Reich: Reichstag Elections 1920/22].www.gonschior.de(in German).Retrieved18 May2023.
- ^Stern, Howard (March 1963)."The Organisation Consul".The Journal of Modern History.35(1). The University of Chicago Press: 27–30.doi:10.1086/243595.JSTOR1899142.S2CID143212336– via JSTOR.
- ^abcdeLlewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (24 September 2019)."War reparations and Weimar Germany".Alpha History.Retrieved17 May2023.
- ^abScriba, Arnulf (2 September 2014)."Weimarer Republik – Außenpolitik – Reparationen"[Weimar Republic – Foreign Policy – Reparations].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved7 May2023.
- ^abWinkler 1998,p. 187.
- ^Llewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (25 September 2019)."The Ruhr Occupation".Alpha History.Retrieved25 May2023.
- ^"Gustav Stresemann".Britannica.6 May 2023.Retrieved14 May2023.
- ^Llewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (26 September 2019)."The hyperinflation of 1923".Alpha History.Retrieved14 May2023.
- ^Schulz, Günther, ed. (2020).Geschäft mit Wort und Meinung[Business with Word and Opinion] (in German). Berlin: DeGruyter. p. 179.
- ^Scriba, Arnulf (6 August 2015)."Die Währungsreform 1923"[The Currency Reform].Deutsches Historisches Museum(in German).Retrieved13 May2023.
- ^Sturm, Reinhart (23 December 2011)."Kampf um die Republik 1919–1923: Kommunistische Umsturzversuche"[Battle for the Republic 1919–1923: Communist Coup Attempts].Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung(in German).Retrieved8 May2023.
- ^Mommsen, Hans (1998).Aufstieg und Untergang der Republik von Weimar. 1918–1933[The Rise and Fall of the Republic of Weimar. 1918–1933] (in German). Berlin: Ullstein. p. 184.ISBN3-548-26508-1.
- ^Zittel, Bernhard (1977)."Kahr, Gustav Ritter von".Neue Deutsche Biographie 11(in German). pp. 29–30.Retrieved19 May2023.
- ^Menges, Franz (1987)."Lossow, Otto von".Neue Deutsche Biographie 15.pp. 204–205.
- ^"The Munich Putsch".Britannica.Retrieved18 May2023.
- ^Longerich 1995,p. 145.
- ^Mommsen 1998,p. 230.
- ^Kitchen, Martin (1996).The Cambridge Illustrated History of Germany.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.p. 241.ISBN978-0521453417.
- ^Mommsen 1998,p. 234.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^Longerich 1995,pp. 174 f..
- ^Mommsen 1998,p. 282.
- ^Winkler 1998,p. 296.
- ^Conze, Werner (1972)."Hindenburg, Paul von".Neue Deutsche Biographie(in German) (9 ed.). pp. 178–182.Retrieved25 May2023.
- ^"The End of the Weimar Republic".Britannica.Retrieved21 May2023.
- ^Ullrich, Volker (20 January 2023)."1923 als Schlüsseljahr für 1933?"[1923 as the Key Year for 1933?].Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung(in German).Retrieved26 May2023.
- ^"The Treaties".Time.2 November 1925.Retrieved20 May2023.
- ^"Dawes Plan".encyclopedia.com.8 June 2018.Retrieved22 May2023.
- ^Whiting, Kenneth R. (1978).The Development of the Soviet Armed Forces, 1917–1977.Montgomery, AL: Air University. pp. 21 f.
- ^Kolb, Eberhard (2009).Die Weimarer Republik(in German) (7 ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg. pp. 70 f.
- ^Kolb 2009,p. 122.
- ^"Josephine Baker in Berlin".Cabaret Berlin – Exploring the entertainment of the Weimar era.8 December 2010.Archivedfrom the original on 30 May 2020.Retrieved11 June2011.
- ^Delmer, Sefton (1972).Weimar Germany: Democracy on Trial.London: Macdonald. pp. 82–93.
- ^Toland, John (1976).Adolf Hitler.New York: Ballantine. p. 101.ISBN0-345-25899-1.
- ^Marc Linder; Ingrid Nygaard (1 January 1998)."Rest in the Rest of the World".Iowa Research Online(PDF). College of Law Publications,University of Iowa.p. 117. Archived fromthe originalon 23 June 2020.Retrieved22 June2020.
- ^Wunderlich, Frieda (1961).Farm Labor in Germany, 1810–1945.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.ISBN9780691041261.
- ^Full text of "Labour Under Nazi Rule".Oxford At The Clarendon Press.
- ^Companje, Karel-Peter; Veraghtert, Karel; Widdershoven, Brigitte (2009).Two Centuries of Solidarity.Amsterdam University Press.ISBN978-90-5260-344-5.
- ^Constantine, Simon (2007).Social Relations in the Estate Villages of Mecklenburg c. 1880–1924.Ashgate Publishing.ISBN978-0-7546-5503-9.
- ^abBärnighausen, Till; Sauerborn, Rainer (2002)."One hundred and eighteen years of the German health insurance system: are there any lessons for middle- and low-income countries?".Social Science & Medicine.54(10): 1559–1587.doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00137-x.PMID12061488.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 15 May 2020.Retrieved30 June2014.
- ^Industrial and Labour Information, Volume 20, International Labour Office, 1926
- ^Modern Germany: society, economy and politics in the twentieth century by Volker R. Berghahn
- ^Parsson, Jens O. (2011).Dying of Money.Dog Ear.ISBN978-1-4575-0266-8.
- ^Berghoff, H.; Spiekermann, U. (2012).Decoding Modern Consumer Societies.Springer.ISBN978-1-137-01300-2.
- ^American Journal of Care for Cripples,Volume 8, Douglas C. McMurtrie, 1919
- ^Hong, Young-Sun (1998).Welfare, Modernity, and the Weimar State, 1919–1933.Princeton University Press.ISBN0-691-05793-1.
- ^Wollmann, Hellmut; Marcou, Gérard (2010).The Provision of Public Services in Europe.Edward Elgar.ISBN978-1-84980-722-7.
- ^Flora, Peter (1986).Growth to Limits: Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy.Walter de Gruyter.ISBN978-3-11-011131-6.Archivedfrom the original on 2 February 2023.Retrieved21 October2020.
- ^Feldman, Gerald D. (1997).The Great Disorder: Politics, Economics, and Society in the German Inflation, 1914–1924.Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-988019-5.Archivedfrom the original on 2 February 2023.Retrieved21 October2020.
- ^AQA History: The Development of Germany, 1871–1925 by Sally Waller
- ^Henig 2002,p.48.
- ^Heino Kaack,Geschichte und Struktur des deutschen Parteiensystems,Springer-Verlag, 2013,ISBN978-3-322-83527-7,pp. 105–108
- ^Llewellyn, Jennifer; Thompson, Steve (9 October 2019)."The Great Depression in Germany".Alpha History.Retrieved15 June2023.
- ^"Unemployment in Nazi Germany".Spartacus Educational.Archivedfrom the original on 1 May 2017.Retrieved1 March2017.
- ^"The end of the Weimar Republic".Britannica online.Retrieved15 June2023.
- ^Morsey, Rudolf (26 October 2010)."Heinrich Brüning".Internet-Portal Westfälische Geschichte(in German).Retrieved15 June2023.
- ^"Das Deutsche Reich. Reichstagswahl 1930"[The German Reich. Reichstag Election 1930].gonschior.de(in German).Retrieved15 June2023.
- ^Fritz-Helmut Wisch, Paul Martin and Marianne Martinson,European problems and Social Policies,Frank & Timme, 2006,ISBN978-3-86596-031-3,p. 151
- ^Sturm, Reinhard (23 December 2011)."Zerstörung der Demokratie 1930–1932: Regierung von Papen"[Destruction of the Democracy 1930–1932: The von Papen Government].Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung(in German).Retrieved12 July2023.
- ^"Franz von Papen".Britannica online.12 January 2000.Retrieved1 July2023.
- ^Hauner, Milan (2005).Hitler. A Chronology of His Life and Time.London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 81.ISBN978-0230584495.
- ^Schulze, Hagen (2001).Germany: A New History.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 241–243.ISBN978-0674005457.
- ^Turner, Henry Ashby(1996).Hitler's Thirty Days to Power: January 1933.Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. p. 8.ISBN9780201407143.
- ^Evans, Richard J.(2004).The Coming of the Third Reich.New York: The Penguin Press. p.446.ISBN1-59420-004-1.
- ^Neumann, Klaus (1991)."Franz von Papen".Internet-Portal Westfälische Geschichte(in German).Retrieved17 July2023.
- ^AsKershaw 1998,p. 468 notes, after the passage of the Act, "Hitler was still far from wielding absolute power. But vital steps toward consolidating his dictatorship now followed in quick succession."
- ^abKlemperer, Klemens von (1992).German Resistance Against Hitler: The Search for Allies Abroad 1938–1945.Oxford: OUP / Clarendon Press.ISBN0-19-821940-7.
- ^Mowrer, Edgar Ansel(1970).Triumph and Turmoil.London: Allen & Unwin. p.209.ISBN0-04-920026-7.
- ^Kershaw 1998,pp. 467–468.
- ^Shirer, William L.(1960).The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.New York:Simon & Schuster.ISBN0-671-72868-7.
- ^Kershaw 1998,p. 468.
- ^Primoratz, Igor (2008).Patriotism: Philosophical and Political Perspectives.Routledge. p. 98.ISBN978-0-7546-7122-0.Archivedfrom the original on 2 February 2023.Retrieved18 September2017.
- ^abZiblatt, Daniel (2017).Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy.Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521172998.
- ^abWeitz, Eric D. (2018).Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy, Weimar Centennial Edition.Princeton University Press.
- ^"German Vampire Notes".PMGNotes.com.16 April 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 14 January 2023.Retrieved1 May2019.
- ^James, Harold, "Economic Reasons for the Collapse of the Weimar Republic", inKershaw 1990,pp. 30–57
- ^Thompson, Carol (June 1944). "Weimar in Retrospect".Current History.6(34): 499.doi:10.1525/curh.1944.6.34.497.
- ^– viaWikisource.
- ^Barth, Rüdiger; Friederichs, Hauke (2020).The Last Winter of the Weimar Republic: The Rise of the Third Reich.Pegasus Books.
- ^Shirer, William L. (1960).The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.Simon & Schuster.p. 186.ISBN9780795317002.
- ^Wheeler-Bennett, Sir John (1964).The Nemesis of Power: The German Army in Politics, 1918–1945.Viking Press.p. 208.Archivedfrom the original on 2 February 2023.Retrieved19 June2022.
- ^Schmitz-Berning, Cornelia (2010).Vokabular des Nationalsozialismus(in German).De Gruyter.pp. 597–598.ISBN978-3-11-092864-8.Archivedfrom the original on 2 February 2023.Retrieved14 October2022.
- ^Wires, Richard (1985).Terminology of the Third Reich.Ball State University.p. 44.LCCN85047938.
- ^Robert, Gerwarth (6 February 2021)."Weimar's Lessons for Biden's America".Foreign Policy.Retrieved14 August2023.
General and cited sources
edit- Henig, Ruth(2002).The Weimar Republic 1919–1933(eBook ed.). Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203046234.ISBN978-0-203-04623-4.
- Kershaw, Ian(1990).Weimar: Why Did German Democracy Fail?.London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.ISBN0-312-04470-4.
- Kershaw, Ian (1998).Hitler 1889–1936: Hubris.London: Allen Lane.ISBN0-393-04671-0.
- Thoss, Bruno (1994). "Der Erste Weltkrieg als Ereignis und Erlebnis. Paradigmenwechsel in der westdeutschen Weltkriegsforschung seit der Fischer-Kontroverse" [The First World War as event and experience. Paradigm Shift in West German World War Research since the Fischer Controversy]. In Wolfgang Michalka (ed.).Der Erste Weltkrieg: Wirkung, Wahrnehmung, Analyse[The First World War: impact, awareness, analysis]. Piper Series (in German). Munich: Piper.ISBN978-3-492-11927-6.OCLC906656746.
- Traverso, Enzo(7 February 2017) [1st pub. Stock (2007)].Fire and Blood: The European Civil War, 1914–1945.London: Verso.ISBN978-1-78478-136-1.OCLC999636811.
Further reading
edit- Allen, William Sheridan(1984).The Nazi seizure of Power: the experience of a single German town, 1922–1945.New York, Toronto: F. Watts.ISBN0-531-09935-0.
- Bennett, Edward W.Germany and the diplomacy of the financial crisis, 1931(1962)Online free to borrow.
- Berghahn, V. R. (1982).Modern Germany.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.ISBN0-521-34748-3.
- Bingham, John(2014).Weimar Cities: The Challenge of Urban Modernity in Germany, 1919–1933.London.
{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Bookbinder, Paul (1996).Weimar Germany: the Republic of the Reasonable.Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.ISBN0-7190-4286-0.
- Broszat, Martin(1987).Hitler and the Collapse of Weimar Germany.Leamington Spa, New York: Berg and St. Martin's Press.ISBN0-85496-509-2.
- Childers, Thomas (1983).The Nazi Voter: The Social Foundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919–1933.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.ISBN0-8078-1570-5.
- Craig, Gordon A.(1980).Germany 1866–1945 (Oxford History of Modern Europe).Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN0-19-502724-8.
- Dorpalen, Andreas (1964).Hindenburg and the Weimar Republic.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.online free to borrow
- Eschenburg, Theodor (1972).Hajo Holborn(ed.).The Role of the Personality in the Crisis of the Weimar Republic: Hindenburg, Brüning, Groener, Schleicher.New York: Pantheon Books. pp. 3–50, Republic to Reich The Making of the Nazi Revolution.
{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Evans, Richard J.The Coming of the Third Reich(2003), a standard scholarly survey; part of three volume history 1919–1945.
- Eyck, Erich.A history of the Weimar Republic: v. 1. From the collapse of the Empire to Hindenburg's election.(1962)online free to borrow
- Feuchtwanger, Edgar (1993).From Weimar to Hitler: Germany, 1918–1933.London: Macmillan.ISBN0-333-27466-0.
- Gay, Peter(1968).Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider.New York: Harper & Row.
- Gordon, Mel (2000).Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin.New York: Feral House.
- Halperin, S. William.Germany Tried Democracy: A Political History of the Reich from 1918 to 1933(1946)online.
- Hamilton, Richard F. (1982).Who Voted for Hitler?.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.ISBN0-691-09395-4.
- Harman, Chris(1982).The Lost Revolution: Germany 1918–1923.Bookmarks.ISBN0-906224-08-X.
- Hett, Benjamin Carter (2018).The Death of Democracy: Hitler's Rise to Power and the Downfall of the Weimar Republic.Henry Holt & Company.
- James, Harold (1986).The German Slump: Politics and Economics, 1924–1936.Oxford, Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press.ISBN0-19-821972-5.
- Kaes, Anton; Jay, Martin; Dimendberg, Edward, eds. (1994).The Weimar Republic Sourcebook.Berkeley: University of California Press.ISBN0-520-06774-6.
- Kolb, Eberhard (1988).The Weimar Republic.P.S. Falla (translator). London: Unwin Hyman.
- Lee, Stephen J. (1998).The Weimar Republic.Routledge. p. 144.
- McDonough, Frank(2023).The Weimar Years: Rise and Fall 1918-1933.London: Apollo.ISBN9781803284781.
- McElligott, Anthony, ed. (2009).Weimar Germany.Oxford University Press.
- Mommsen, Hans(1991).From Weimar to Auschwitz.Philip O'Connor (translator). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.ISBN0-691-03198-3.
- Nicholls, Anthony James (2000).Weimar and the Rise of Hitler.New York: St. Martin's Press.ISBN0-312-23350-7.
- Niewyk, Donald L. (1980).The Jews in Weimar Germany.Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.ISBN9780807106617.
- Peukert, Detlev(1992).The Weimar Republic: the Crisis of Classical Modernity.New York: Hill and Wang.ISBN0-8090-9674-9.
- Rosenberg, Arthur.A History of the German Republic(1936) 370pponline
- Smith, Helmut Walser, ed. (2011).The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History.Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-872891-7.ch 18–25.
- Turner, Henry Ashby(1996).Hitler's Thirty Days To Power: January 1933.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.ISBN0-201-40714-0.
- Turner, Henry Ashby(1985).German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler.New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN0-19-503492-9.
- Weitz, Eric D. (2007).Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.ISBN978-0-691-01695-5.
- Wheeler-Bennett, John(2005).The Nemesis of Power: German Army in Politics, 1918–1945.New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing Company.ISBN1-4039-1812-0.
- Wheeler-Bennett, Sir John(1967) [1936].Hindenburg: the Wooden Titan.London: Macmillan.
- Widdig, Bernd (2001).Culture and Inflation in Weimar Germany.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.ISBN978-0-520-22290-8.
- Willett, John(1978).The New Sobriety 1917–1933: Art and Politics in the Weimar Period.London: Thames & Hudson.ISBN978-0-500-27172-8.
Primary sources
edit- Boyd, Julia (2018).Travelers in the Third Reich: The Rise of Fascism: 1919–1945.Pegasus Books.ISBN978-1-68177-782-5.
- Kaes, Anton, Martin Jay and Edward Dimendberg, eds.The Weimar Republic Sourcebook,(U of California Press, 1994).
- Price, Morgan Philips.Dispatches from the Weimar Republic: Versailles and German Fascism(1999), reporting by an English journalist
Historiography
edit- Bryden, Eric Jefferson. "In search of founding fathers: Republican historical narratives in Weimar Germany, 1918–1933" (PhD thesis. University of California, Davis, 2008).
- Fritzsche, Peter (1996). "Did Weimar Fail?".The Journal of Modern History.68(3): 629–656.doi:10.1086/245345.JSTOR2946770.S2CID39454890.
- Gerwarth, Robert. "The past in Weimar History"Contemporary European History15#1 (2006), pp. 1–22online
- Graf, Rüdiger. "Either-or: The narrative of 'crisis' in Weimar Germany and in historiography."Central European History43.4 (2010): 592–615.online
- Haffert, Lukas, Nils Redeker, and Tobias Rommel. "Misremembering Weimar: Hyperinflation, the Great Depression, and German collective economic memory."Economics & Politics33.3 (2021): 664–686. online
- Von der Goltz, Anna.Hindenburg: Power, Myth, and the Rise of the Nazis(Oxford University Press, 2009)
External links
edit