Wikipedia:Naming conventions (chemistry)

(Redirected fromWikipedia:CHEMPREFIX)

General rule

edit

FromWikipedia:Naming conventions:

Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.

Organic compound names

edit

Trivial names(non-systematic, or "common" names) are favored for use in titles of articles for organic compounds instead ofsystematic names.Trivial names are usually different from thepreferred namefollowingIUPAC nomenclature.For compounds lacking trivial names, as is often the case for complex structures,substitutive nomenclatureor other systematic names may be used. The general rule is to use the name most commonly used to refer to the compound, as evidenced by use inreliable sources(in line withWP:COMMONNAME).

Classes of compounds may have more specific guidance on naming, such as the use ofinternational nonproprietary namesforpharmaceutical compounds(seeWP:NCMEDandbelow).

Examples of use of trivial names and not systematic names include:

acetic acid not ethanoic acid
toluene not methylbenzene
lysine not 2,6-diaminohexanoic acid
1-pentanol not pentan-1-ol
benzaldehyde not benzenecarbaldehyde
diethyl ether not ethoxyethane
benzophenone not diphenylmethanone

Systematic and other accepted names for the compound not used as the article title should instead beredirectstagged with the{{R from alternative name}}template and listed in thechemboxas other names, with especially significant alternative namesmentioned in the lede in bold font.

The periodic table

edit

Groups

edit
Note that "group" has a chemical meaning and "column" has the tabular meaning.
  • Alternatively, they may be named by their first element, e.g. "boron group"for group 13.[2](But per below, avoidiron groupforgroup 8as ambiguous.)
  • In the 1–18 scheme, f-block groups are unnumbered. There is no widely-agreed system of numbering these groups in the literature, so one should not be used.
Avoid labeling these groups asn/a(for not applicable?, or not available i.e. "not found yet"?). Best is to leave this group number blank. Provide textual description when needed. This also applies to any (theoretical) g-block groups.
To refer to such a group (column), list the elements explicitly, e.g.ytterbium and nobelium.Do not name by first element (ytterbium group). The reasons for this are that many of the expected first-element names have other meanings as rare earth separation groups (see "Non-column groups" below), and that referring to individual f-block groups in the literature is rare (so it's better to be explicit).
  • Hydrogen belongs togroup 1(notgroup 17orfloating outside all groups), and helium belongs togroup 18(notgroup 2).[1][3]
  • "halogen" and "noble gas" are used to refer to the entirety of groups 17 and 18, per a 2016 IUPAC report about naming new elements[4]Some sources focusing onsuperheavy elementsmay not considertennessine(Ts) to be a halogen, oroganesson(Og) to be a noble gas, as their predicted chemistry is generally supposed to be quite different from those of their lighter congeners. Such more limited usage should be explained before its first occurrence.
  • A few groups have IUPAC-approved names, calledtrivial name,that may also be used:
alkali metal= group 1 excepthydrogen
alkaline earth metal= group 2
triels= group 13
tetrels= group 14
pnictogen= group 15 (earlierpentels)
chalcogen= group 16
halogen= group 17
noble gas= group 18
  • Triels(group 13),tetrels(group 14) andpentels(group 15) have been previously recommended by IUPAC (in 1970), and the former two are stillused by them,though they are not in the most recent Red Book. Avoid rarer synonyms likeicosagen(group 13) andcrystallogen(group 14).
  • Avoidcoinage metalforgroup 11,since "metal used for making coins" (seecoinage metal) contains also metals outside of group 11, and roentgenium in group 11 is (for obvious reasons) not used for coins.
  • The group numberings with Roman numbers and "A" and "B" suffixes (likeVIIA,VIII) should not be used, as they are outdated and ambiguous. For example, in the CAS scheme "group VIIB"denotesmanganese group(group 7), while in the old IUPAC scheme it denoteshalogen group(group 17). If they are used at all, context should clarify (disambiguate) into the 1–18 numbering. Care should be taken when translating old sources that use this nomenclature to modern terminology.
  • Somesets of groupshave names:
    • Themain group elementsare the elements of groups 1, 2, and 13–18 (i.e. the s-block and p-block).[5]
    • Thetransition elementsare the elements of groups 3–12 (i.e. the d-block) – this in particularincludesgroup 12 (although some sources do not include it).[5]
    • Theinner transition elementsare f-block elements.[2]

The scandium group (group 3)

edit
  • The scandium group shouldby defaultbe treated as containingthe elements scandium (Sc), yttrium (Y), lutetium (Lu), and lawrencium (Lr).Lanthanum (La) and actinium (Ac),which in some sources take the positions of lutetium and lawrencium (especially in older sources), shouldnotbe in group 3. Care should be taken when employing sources that mention "group 3" or "group IIIB" or "group IIIA", since they may not always use this arrangement.
This group 3 set is established per the 1988 IUPAC report[1]and per a subsequent 2021 provisional report by a IUPAC project dedicated to this constitution question[3]
In fact, the old classification was based on erroneous early measurements of electron configurations,[6]and was already criticised as "incorrect" byLev LandauandEvgeny Lifshitzin 1948.[7]The IUPAC report convention is accepted by most chemists and physicists considering the subject.[8][9]
Note that the so-called "IUPAC(-published) periodic table" is not actually approved by IUPAC.[10]It leaves the spaces below yttrium blank, and there is significant confusion among (and within) sources on whether that includes the lanthanides and actinides in group 3 or not;[11]hence this form is also best avoided.

Non-column groups

edit
  • In case of commonly named "groups" that are not a column, such asPlatinum grouporIron group,care should be taken that no confusion remains with column-wise periodic table group.

18 vs 32 columns

edit
The 18-column format used on Wikipedia; see below for the 32-column format that is also used
  • The periodic table can be displayed in either 18- or 32-column format, with the 32-column format as in Fig. 4 of the aforementioned 2021 IUPAC report. The forms present the same scientific statement and should be consistent with each other. The 18-column format cuts out the f-block rows, containing the elements lanthanum (La) throughytterbium(Yb) and actinium (Ac) throughnobelium(No), and places them at the bottom of the table.[1]Asterisks should be placed between groups 2 and 3 to indicate the theoretical position of these cut-out rows.
Note that these f-block rowsdo not equalthelanthanides/lanthanoids (La–Lu) andactinides/actinoids (Ac–Lr) which commonly extend to include lutetium and lawrencium.
  • Other structures, e.g. the Janet left-step or the 8-group form, should only be used whenspecificallyillustrating such alternative periodic tables.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 H He
2 Li Be B C N O F Ne
3 Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar
4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr
5 Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe
6 Cs Ba La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn
7 Fr Ra Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr Rf Db Sg Bh Hs Mt Ds Rg Cn Nh Fl Mc Lv Ts Og

Blocks

edit

At this English wiki, the preferred presentation coloring scheme of the elements is by blocks (s, p, d, or f).

The colours to be used are given in{{Element color}}:

  • s-block#ff9999
  • p-block#fdff8c
  • d-block#99ccff
  • f-block#9bff99

This template also gives colours for the higher orbitals:

  • g-block#fd99ff
  • h-block#7ed9d9
  • i-block#e0c880

Categorising elements

edit

Categorisationis an attempt to classify all elements into one overall scheme, with each element in exactly one category (as opposed to listing non-completifying sets likecoinage metals). A general classification is not achieved in sources (let alone withoutWP:NPOVandWP:OR). Such categorisation then is not to be used in general (for example, not as a general coloring of the periodic table).

A general colouring by metallicity is discouraged, because there areWP:NPOVandWP:NORconcerns: the borders of some categories can differ drastically between sources (e.g.metalloids), and there is no set of categories that are mutually exclusive and yet cover the entire periodic table (e.g. astatine is quite likely to be both a metal and a halogen). However, such coloring may be used to base and illustrate dedicated topics (such as in sections ofmetalloids). Individual, well-established "metallicity" categories, e.g.transition metal,post-transition metal,metalloid,rare earth metalsetc., can be referred to without "all elements all once" colouring.

When a specific categorisation scheme is relevant (e.g.{{ChemicalBondsToCarbon}}), a periodic table-filling categorisation can be applied.

Element names

edit

Traditionally, the names of threeelementshave been spelled differently in different parts of the English-speaking world. For articles about chemistry-related topics, Wikipedia follows the spellings recommended by theInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry(IUPAC):[12][2]

aluminium not aluminum
sulfur not sulphur
caesium not cesium

These spellings should be used in all chemistry-related articles on English Wikipedia, even if they conflict with the other national spelling varieties used in the article.

This convention should also be applied to all compounds and derivative names of these chemicals:sulfatenotsulphate;sulfuricnotsulphuric;etc.

The English name of element 74 istungstenand notwolfram:the latter wasonceadopted by IUPAC (in1949), but is no longer recommended by them (even as an alternative) per the 2011Principles.(Of course, the symbol is still W, and the name "wolfram" may be referred to when explaining why that is the case, or when quoting text in languages that use that name.) Similarly for derivatives (per the 2005 Red Book), usetungstate,tungsty,tungstaand notwolframate,wolframy,wolframa.(And similarly avoid the old namesemanationandnitonfor element 86 outside historical contexts; there is a real confusion even in today's literature between radon meaning the element Rn and radon meaning the isotope222Rn, but the way to solve that is by explicitly clarifying what is meant, not resurrecting archaic terms that have fallen out of use and may not be generally understood.)

Elements that have not been given trivial names by IUPAC may be referred to either by IUPACsystematic element namesand symbols, or by atomic numbers. Soununenniumandelement 119are both correct, and symbolsUue,119,E119may all be used in text. However, fornatural disambiguation,the article titles should be at the systematic names.

When new elements are recognised,do notchange the names and symbols to those proposed by the discoverers until the public comment period expires and IUPAC makes the final announcement! (The symbol has changed between the initial proposal and the final recommendation before, in the case ofcopernicium:originally proposed as Cp, but became Cn.)

Isotopes

edit
  • Isotopes are named and identified as [element]-[mass number] with regular lowercase and hyphen (carbon-13), or by equivalent symbol format13C(in wikicode:<sup>13</sup>C). Avoid13C,C-13,C13(and avoid like single characterU+2074SUPERSCRIPT FOUR,as used in Wikidata).
  • Metastable states are noted by formattantalum-180m1,180m1Ta.The number1can be omitted when there is only one isomeric state, e.g.tantalum-180m,180mTa.You may use anuclide template.Corresponding letters also used in literature, these are not used in this wiki:m n p q.
  • The hydrogen isotopes are exceptions where the common special names may be used:
    • Protium(=hydrogen-1,1H).
    • Deuterium,D,2D(=hydrogen-2,2H).
    • Tritium,T,3T(=hydrogen-3,3H).
  • Chemical formulae with deuterated solvents (for example, inNMRuse) are customarily described with "D" as chemical symbol: CD3OD, methanol-d4;CD3SOCD3,DMSO-d6(regular notation would be C2H3O2H). These established systems are acceptable, provided they are consistent within an article.
  • Some isotopes have had historical or confusing names and symbols, these are to be avoided (except when quoting historical usage): e.g.thoron(Tn) (220Rn),actinon(An) (219Rn),ionium(Io) (230Th),radiocarbon(14C).
  • It is permissible to use the atomic number rather than the symbol in contexts about history when anachronism is to be avoided, e.g. "In 2003, the collaboration at the JINR discovered288115 and284113"(because at that point those elements had not yet been named). But this should be avoided outside talking about history. Avoid using the systematic element names in such contexts even when talking about history, because they are not supposed to be used once the element actually has a trivial name. For isotopes of undiscovered elements, either systematic names (e.g.296Uue) or atomic numbers (e.g.296119) are acceptable for the symbols, but only the systematic names can be used for the full names (e.g.ununennium-296,notelement 119-296which nobody uses).

Theoretical elements

edit

Elements with atomic numberZ≥ 119are theoretical elements, they have not been discovered (synthesized). Regarding public-page creation and content (reader-visible pages, such as artricle, category, template):

  • Element page:Articles pages, by systematic name, exist for E119 up to E184:Ununennium(Element 119).
These are either full articles (like Ununennium) or redirects (likeUnbitrium,58 redirects). This serves readers searching for these element names.
  • Redirect element articles likeUnbitrium(Element 123) R:
PerWP:notabilityandWP:Reliable sources,these articles can and may only be created with content when substantial information is available.
These can and may only be created (1) when the base element article exists by content, and (2) when substantial new information like papers is available. These secondary pages may not be created as redirect.

To compare: Disovered elementOganesson(E118) has its article, plus all five secondary articles; none is a redirect.

As of 4 Jan 2023:Effectively this means that currently public-page creation, by content or redirect, is not permitted nor needed. See also documentation atTemplate:Infobox element § Theoretical elements handling.

Capitalization of elements and compounds

edit

The names of elements and other chemicals should be written without abbreviations and treated ascommon nouns.They do not have special capitalization or italic formatting (seeMOS:CAPSandMOS:ITALIC) regardless of the origin of the name unless appropriate for the start of a sentence or part of a title. The symbols for elements should always be capitalized.

Use:Iron and californium (Fe and Cf) are metals. After I iron my clothes, I will go to California.
Avoid:Iron and californium (fe and cf) are metals.
Avoid:Iron and Californium (Fe and Cf) are metals.
Avoid:Ironandcalifornium(Fe and Cf) are metals.

Prefixes that are such assec-,tert-,ortho-,meta-,para-, α-, β-,D-,L-, (+)-, (−)-, (R)-, (S)- and the numerical prefixes are not considered part of the name: they each follow their own capitalization and italics rules, and it is instead the first letter of the main part of the name that is treated as the "first letter" of the name to be capitalized where appropriate. Exceptions arecyclo,iso,neo,andspirowhich are considered part of the name and therefore not italicized or hyphenated.Substituentgroups are also considered part of the name.

In former versions of the IUPAC recommendations, names were written with a capital initial letter. This practice has been abandoned in later publications.[13]IUPAC policy differentiate proper names from things named after proper names. This rule (full name uncapitalized but symbol capitalized) applies also to isotopes and nuclides, when completely written out: thus14C but carbon-14.

Prefixes in titles

edit

When the chosen article title starts with a prefix including positional identifiers (ortho-,meta-,para-,N-,O-, α-, β-, γ-, etc.), isomeric identifiers (sec-,tert-, etc.), stereochemical identifiers (cis-,trans-, (E)-, (Z)-, etc.), chiral identifiers ((R)-, (S)-,D-,L-, (+)-, (−)-, etc.), or numbers, the first letter after the prefix in the name should be capitalized: hence titlecase1,1,1-Trichloroethanenot1,1,1-trichloroethane.A redirect from the uncapitalized version should be created to simplify linking from other articles.

Non-numerical prefixes are italicized and uncapitalized in titles (tert-Butyl alcohol,for example). Both numerical and non-numerical prefixes are followed by a hyphen. The template{{DISPLAYTITLE}}is used to display titles which start with lowercase letters or include italics.

Note thatcyclo,iso,neo,andspiroare considered part of a chemical name (such asisopropanol) and not considered prefixes. No hyphens or italics are used in these cases.

Article titles for compounds and related topics should reflect how the compound name iscommonlywritten and use Greek letter prefixes if appropriate, e.g.Α-Ketoglutaric acid,using{{DISPLAYTITLE}}to display asα-Ketoglutaric acid,notAlpha-Ketoglutaric acidand displaying asalpha-Ketoglutaric acid.In the article page name (article location) it is important to use the uppercase Greek letter, even though it can be easily confused with uppercase Latin letters in many cases, so that DISPLAYTITLE (or alternatively,{{lowercase title}}) will work properly. It is also essential toensure redirects exist for all possible typed variationsof the compound name so searchers can easily reach the appropriate article.

Use of Stock nomenclature

edit

Stock nomenclaturefor inorganic compounds is based on the indication of theoxidation number(as a roman numeral, in parentheses) of each of the major elements in the compound,e.g.iron(III) chloride.It is widely, if sometimes incorrectly, used on Wikipedia for the titles of articles about inorganic compounds.It is not obligatory,as there are other acceptable methods for naming these compounds, but it is often preferred as the most common non-ambiguous name for a substance. The following guidelines are based on current WikiBestPractice:

  1. Only thecationicelement (i.e. the element whose name appears unchanged in the compound name) is assigned its oxidation number. Except in rare cases (none at present), we do not assign the oxidation number in theanion:hencepotassium permanganatenotpotassium manganate(VII),sodium hypochloritenotsodium chlorate(I).
  2. There is no space between the end of the element name and the opening parenthesis: hencesilver(I) fluoridenotsilver (I) fluoride.Notethat this is an exception to the usual English style for parentheses.
  3. It is not necessary to specify the oxidation number when there is no possibility of ambiguity in the compound title: hencesodium chloridenotsodium(I) chloride.
  4. Stock nomenclature should be used for predominantly ionic compounds. Compounds with a substantial degree of covalency should be named by stoichiometric nomenclature: hencetitanium tetrachloridenottitanium(IV) chloride.However, it should be noted that ionic vs. covalent (not to mention metallic and van der Waals bonding) is a continuum and that many such situations will require significant editorial judgement (e.g.mercury(II) chloride,which is in fact a molecular compound, orruthenium(IV) oxidewhich exhibits metallic conductivity).

Names of oxyanions should in general follow the names in Table X of the IUPAC 2005 Red Book.[2]Exceptions can be made if an alternate name is much more common in the literature, e.g.xenaterather thanxenonate(don't generalise this to radon though, as it would create an ambiguity between radon and radium).

edit

Where a compound has aWHOinternational nonproprietary name(INN), this should be used as the article title (seeWP:NCMED). Exceptions would be where the pharmaceutical use of a certain compound is secondary to other applications (commodity chemical, synthetic intermediate, etc., agriculture or industry).

Redirects

edit
FromWikipedia:Deletion policy:"Don't worry, redirects are cheap."

Redirectsshould be created for:

  • Alternative names for the compound, including acronyms where appropriate;
  • Alternative capitalizations, where there is a numerical prefix in the article title;
  • Formulas of simple compounds; for exampleH2Owater.

Exceptions

edit

Even with the best will in the world, no set of guidelines can cover every case. Some articles on Wikipedia have non-standard titles through consensus that this is the most commonly used name (in scientific circumstances) for the compound concerned,whateverIUPAC or the other rules suggest. For example:

ethylene oxidenotoxirane
phosphinenotphosphane(and for substitutedphosphines,arsine,stibine,andbismuthine)
Wilkinson's catalystnotchlorotris(triphenylphosphane)rhodium
Vaska's complexnotcarbonylchlorobis(triphenylphosphane)iridium
titinnotmethionylthreonylthreonylglutaminylalanyl...(189,768 letters)...isoleucine[a]

Please do not revert-war over the naming of an article: the best place for discussion is on the article's talk page or (failing that) atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals.

Groups of compounds

edit

Organic compound classes and functional groups

edit

For articles about classes of organic compounds, the singular class name from the IUPAC "Glossary of Class Names"[14]is usually used, e.g.alkane,carboxylic acid,ether,ketone,acyl chloride.Articles aboutfunctional groupsshould use the name mostcommonly usedto refer to the group inreliable sources(generally, the name of the correspondingradical) followed by the word "group", e.g.alkyl group,carboxyl group,phenyl group,carbonyl group,trimethylsilyl group,triflyl group.In many cases, the compound or compound class and corresponding functional group are discussed in the same article, generally using the compound class as the article title with the name(s) of the functional group redirecting there (although the opposite is possible).

For groups of compounds named after a simple parent compound, articles about the group should be located at thepluralof the parent compound name, e.g.hydrazines,silanes,boranes,diphosphenes.Similarly,saltsandestersofcarboxylic acidsshould collectively be referred to by the plural of thecarboxylate.In some cases, the group of compounds (e.g.triflates), the functional group (e.g.triflate group), and the carboxylate (e.g.triflate) will warrant a separate article; whether the article should be titled by the compound group, functional group, or carboxylate should be decided on a case by case basis depending on the group and how the article is constructed. Related terms not chosen as the title should be redirects and mentioned in the lede in bold font. In cases where the carboxylate is not generally considered as a functional group, the plural may either redirect to the article about the parent acid (or the carboxylate if there is a separate article about the carboxylate), or be a separate article orchemistry indexthat lists salts and esters of the parent acid (e.g.benzoates). Rare cases may have separate articles for the carboxylate, functional group, and group of compounds.Hatnotesshould be used to link between these similarly named pages to facilitate navigation between these closely related topics.

Organometallic compounds

edit

The general article about theorganometallic chemistryof an element should be entitled "Organo[element] chemistry", e.g.,organomercury chemistry,organopalladium chemistry,organozinc chemistry.The IUPAC definition of an "organometallic compound" includes boron, silicon, arsenic, and selenium, so this title guideline also applies toorganoboron chemistry,organosilicon chemistry,etc.[15]For consistency this is extended even to obvious nonmetals, e.g.organoxenon chemistry.The related pages "Organo[element] compound" and its plural should generally be redirects. Some flexibility can be used if the article is heavily weighted toward a specific topic, such as the case fororganolithium reagent,so long as the other forms redirect there. In some cases, abroad-concept articleregarding the organometallic chemistry of an element may not yet exist; in these cases it is adequate to redirect these terms to an appropriate section of another article. On the other hand, depending on the metallic element, it may well be appropriate to have additional articles covering specific compounds or groups of compounds, or specific reactions.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abcdFluck, E. (1988)."New Notations in the Periodic Table"(PDF).Pure Appl. Chem.60(3): 431–436.doi:10.1351/pac198860030431.S2CID96704008.Archived(PDF)from the original on 25 March 2012.Retrieved24 March2012.
  2. ^abcdInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry(2005).Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry(IUPAC Recommendations 2005). Cambridge (UK):RSCIUPAC.ISBN0-85404-438-8.pp. 47, 51, 248.Electronic version.
  3. ^abScerri, Eric (18 January 2021)."Provisional Report on Discussions on Group 3 of the Periodic Table"(PDF).Chemistry International.43(1): 31–34.doi:10.1515/ci-2021-0115.S2CID231694898.Archived(PDF)from the original on 13 April 2021.Retrieved9 April2021.
  4. ^Koppenol, W. (2016)."How to name new chemical elements"(PDF).Pure and Applied Chemistry.DeGruyter.doi:10.1515/pac-2015-0802.hdl:10045/55935.S2CID102245448.Archived(PDF)from the original on 11 May 2020.Retrieved15 August2021.
  5. ^abLeigh, G. J., ed. (2011).Principles of Chemical Nomenclature(PDF).The Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 9.ISBN978-1-84973-007-5.
  6. ^William B. Jensen (1982). "The Positions of Lanthanum (Actinium) and Lutetium (Lawrencium) in the Periodic Table".J. Chem. Educ.59(8): 634–636.Bibcode:1982JChEd..59..634J.doi:10.1021/ed059p634.
  7. ^L. D. Landau,E. M. Lifshitz(1958).Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory.Vol. 3 (1st ed.).Pergamon Press.pp. 256–7.
  8. ^Jensen, William B. (2015)."The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table: an update".Foundations of Chemistry.17:23–31.doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9216-1.S2CID98624395.Archivedfrom the original on 30 January 2021.Retrieved28 January2021.
  9. ^Scerri, Eric (2019). "Five ideas in chemical education that must die".Foundations of Chemistry.21:61–69.doi:10.1007/s10698-018-09327-y.S2CID104311030.
  10. ^Leigh, G. Jeffery (2009)."Periodic Tables and IUPAC".Chemistry International.31(1): 4–6.doi:10.1515/ci.2009.31.1.4.Retrieved17 November2022.
  11. ^It is not very clear how the 15 element cells for La–Lu are meant to fit below the one cell for Y. See for examplePyykkö, Pekka (2019)."An essay on periodic tables"(PDF).Pure and Applied Chemistry.91(12): 1959–1967.doi:10.1515/pac-2019-0801.Retrieved27 November2022.,which both suggests that there is a hole in period 6 and group 3 in this form, and that all the trivalent rare earths fit there. These cannot simultaneously be true. In the 1990 IUPAC Red Book and a 2009Chemistry Internationalarticle by G. J. Leigh, this "blank below Y" table in 18-column is expanded to a 32-column table with Lu below Y. If this is the intention, it seems better to make it clear by putting Lu there in the 18-column form as well, as drawn in the 2021 report and a 2019Chemistry Internationalarticle by E. R. Scerri, and as described in the 1988 report.
  12. ^Panico, R.; Powell, W. H. (Eds.) (1994).A Guide to IUPAC Nomenclature of Organic Compounds 1993.Oxford: Blackwell Science.ISBN0-6320-3488-2.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^Preferred IUPAC Names Provisional Recommendation,September 2004; Chapter 1, par. 16 Name writing, p.80-90
  14. ^Moss, G.P.; Smith, P.A.S.; Tavernier, D. (1995)."Glossary of Class Names for Organic Compounds and Reactive Intermediates Based on Structure (IUPAC Recommendations 1995)"(PDF).Pure and Applied Chemistry.67(8–9): 1307–1375.doi:10.1351/pac199567081307.
  15. ^IUPAC,Compendium of Chemical Terminology,2nd ed. (the "Gold Book" ) (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "organometallic compounds".doi:10.1351/goldbook.O04328

Notes

edit
  1. ^SeeLongest word in Englishfor more information.
General references
edit