In science,workis theenergytransferred to or from anobjectvia the application offorcealong adisplacement.In its simplest form, for a constant force aligned with the direction of motion, the work equals theproductof the force strength and the distance traveled. A force is said to dopositive workif it has a component in the direction of the displacement of thepoint of application.A force doesnegative workif it has a component opposite to the direction of the displacement at the point of application of the force.[1]
Work | |
---|---|
Common symbols | W |
SI unit | joule(J) |
Other units | Foot-pound,Erg |
InSI base units | 1kg⋅m2⋅s−2 |
Derivations from other quantities | W=F⋅s W=τθ |
Dimension |
For example, when a ball is held above the ground and then dropped, the work done by the gravitational force on the ball as it falls is positive, and is equal to the weight of the ball (a force) multiplied by the distance to the ground (a displacement). If the ball is thrown upwards, the work done by the gravitational force is negative, and is equal to the weight multiplied by the displacement in the upwards direction.
Both force and displacement arevectors.The work done is given by thedot productof the two vectors, where the result is ascalar.When the forceFis constant and the angleθbetween the force and the displacementsis also constant, then the work done is given by:
If the force is variable, then work is given by theline integral:
whereis the tiny change in displacement vector.
Work is ascalar quantity,[2]so it has only magnitude and no direction. Work transfers energy from one place to another, or one form to another. TheSI unitof work is thejoule(J), the same unit as for energy.
History
editTheancient Greek understanding of physicswas limited to thestaticsof simple machines (the balance of forces), and did not includedynamicsor the concept of work. During theRenaissancethe dynamics of theMechanical Powers,as thesimple machineswere called, began to be studied from the standpoint of how far they could lift a load, in addition to the force they could apply, leading eventually to the new concept of mechanical work. The complete dynamic theory of simple machines was worked out by Italian scientistGalileo Galileiin 1600 inLe Meccaniche(On Mechanics), in which he showed the underlying mathematical similarity of the machines as force amplifiers.[3][4]He was the first to explain that simple machines do not create energy, only transform it.[3]
Early concepts of work
editAlthoughworkwas not formally used until 1826, similar concepts existed before then. Early names for the same concept includedmoment of activity, quantity of action, latent live force, dynamic effect, efficiency,and evenforce.[5]In 1637, the French philosopherRené Descarteswrote:[6]
Lifting 100 lb one foot twice over is the same as lifting 200 lb one foot, or 100 lb two feet.
— René Descartes, Letter to Huygens
In 1686, the German philosopherGottfried Leibnizwrote:[7]
The same force [ "work" in modern terms] is necessary to raise body A of 1 pound (libra) to a height of 4 yards (ulnae), as is necessary to raise body B of 4 pounds to a height of 1 yard.
— Gottfried Leibniz, Brevis demonstratio
In 1759,John Smeatondescribed a quantity that he called "power" "to signify the exertion of strength, gravitation, impulse, or pressure, as to produce motion." Smeaton continues that this quantity can be calculated if "the weight raised is multiplied by the height to which it can be raised in a given time," making this definition remarkably similar toCoriolis's.[8]
Etymology
editAccording to the 1957 physics textbook byMax Jammer,[9]the termworkwas introduced in 1826 by the French mathematicianGaspard-Gustave Coriolis[10]as "weightliftedthrough a height ", which is based on the use of earlysteam enginesto lift buckets of water out of flooded ore mines. According to Rene Dugas, French engineer and historian, it is toSolomon of Caux"that we owe the termworkin the sense that it is used in mechanics now ".[11]
Units
editTheSIunit of work is thejoule(J), named after English physicistJames Prescott Joule(1818-1889), which is defined as the work required to exert a force of onenewtonthrough a displacement of onemetre.
The dimensionally equivalentnewton-metre(N⋅m) is sometimes used as the measuring unit for work, but this can be confused with the measurement unit oftorque.Usage of N⋅m is discouraged by theSI authority,since it can lead to confusion as to whether the quantity expressed in newton-metres is a torque measurement, or a measurement of work.[12]
Another unit for work is thefoot-pound,which comes from the English system of measurement. As the unit name suggests, it is the product of pounds for the unit of force and feet for the unit of displacement. One joule is equivalent to 0.07376 ft-lbs.[13]
Non-SI units of work include the newton-metre,erg,the foot-pound, thefoot-poundal,thekilowatt hour,thelitre-atmosphere,and thehorsepower-hour.Due to work having the samephysical dimensionasheat,occasionally measurement units typically reserved for heat or energy content, such astherm,BTUandcalorie,are used as a measuring unit.
Work and energy
editThe workWdone by a constant force of magnitudeFon a point that moves a displacementsin a straight line in the direction of the force is the product
For example, if a force of 10 newtons (F= 10 N) acts along a point that travels 2 metres (s= 2 m), thenW=Fs= (10 N) (2 m) = 20 J.This is approximately the work done lifting a 1 kg object from ground level to over a person's head against the force of gravity.
The work is doubled either by lifting twice the weight the same distance or by lifting the same weight twice the distance.
Work is closely related toenergy.Energy shares the same unit of measurement with work (Joules) because the energy from the object doing work is transferred to the other objects it interacts with when work is being done.[13]The work–energy principle states that an increase in the kinetic energy of arigid bodyis caused by an equal amount of positive work done on the body by the resultant force acting on that body. Conversely, a decrease in kinetic energy is caused by an equal amount of negative work done by the resultant force. Thus, if the net work is positive, then the particle's kinetic energy increases by the amount of the work. If the net work done is negative, then the particle's kinetic energy decreases by the amount of work.[14]
FromNewton's second law,it can be shown that work on a free (no fields), rigid (no internal degrees of freedom) body, is equal to the change in kinetic energyEkcorresponding to the linear velocity andangular velocityof that body, The work of forces generated by a potential function is known aspotential energyand the forces are said to beconservative.Therefore, work on an object that is merely displaced in a conservative forcefield,without change in velocity or rotation, is equal tominusthe change of potential energyEpof the object, These formulas show that work is the energy associated with the action of a force, so work subsequently possesses thephysical dimensions,and units, of energy. The work/energy principles discussed here are identical to electric work/energy principles.
Constraint forces
editConstraint forces determine the object's displacement in the system, limiting it within a range. For example, in the case of aslopeplus gravity, the object isstuck tothe slope and, when attached to a taut string, it cannot move in an outwards direction to make the string any 'tauter'. It eliminates all displacements in that direction, that is, the velocity in the direction of the constraint is limited to 0, so that the constraint forces do not perform work on the system.
For amechanical system,[15]constraint forces eliminate movement in directions that characterize the constraint. Thus thevirtual workdone by the forces of constraint is zero, a result which is only true if friction forces are excluded.[16]
Fixed, frictionless constraint forces do not perform work on the system,[17]as the angle between the motion and the constraint forces is always90°.[17]Examples of workless constraints are: rigid interconnections between particles, sliding motion on a frictionless surface, and rolling contact without slipping.[18]
For example, in a pulley system like theAtwood machine,the internal forces on the rope and at the supporting pulley do no work on the system. Therefore, work need only be computed for the gravitational forces acting on the bodies. Another example is thecentripetal forceexertedinwardsby a string on a ball in uniformcircular motionsidewaysconstrains the ball to circular motion restricting its movement away from the centre of the circle. This force does zero work because it is perpendicular to the velocity of the ball.
Themagnetic forceon a charged particle isF=qv×B,whereqis the charge,vis the velocity of the particle, andBis themagnetic field.The result of across productis always perpendicular to both of the original vectors, soF⊥v.Thedot productof two perpendicular vectors is always zero, so the workW=F⋅v= 0,and the magnetic force does not do work. It can change the direction of motion but never change the speed.
Mathematical calculation
editFor moving objects, the quantity of work/time (power) is integrated along the trajectory of the point of application of the force. Thus, at any instant, the rate of the work done by a force (measured in joules/second, orwatts) is thescalar productof the force (a vector), and the velocity vector of the point of application. This scalar product of force and velocity is known as instantaneouspower.Just as velocities may be integrated over time to obtain a total distance, by thefundamental theorem of calculus,the total work along a path is similarly the time-integral of instantaneous power applied along the trajectory of the point of application.[19]
Work is the result of a force on a point that follows a curveX,with a velocityv,at each instant. The small amount of workδWthat occurs over an instant of timedtis calculated as where theF⋅vis the power over the instantdt.The sum of these small amounts of work over the trajectory of the point yields the work, whereCis the trajectory fromx(t1) tox(t2). This integral is computed along the trajectory of the particle, and is therefore said to bepath dependent.
If the force is always directed along this line, and the magnitude of the force isF,then this integral simplifies to wheresis displacement along the line. IfFis constant, in addition to being directed along the line, then the integral simplifies further to wheresis the displacement of the point along the line.
This calculation can be generalized for a constant force that is not directed along the line, followed by the particle. In this case thedot productF⋅ds=Fcosθds,whereθis the angle between the force vector and the direction of movement,[19]that is
When a force component is perpendicular to the displacement of the object (such as when a body moves in a circular path under acentral force), no work is done, since the cosine of 90° is zero.[14]Thus, no work can be performed by gravity on a planet with a circular orbit (this is ideal, as all orbits are slightly elliptical). Also, no work is done on a body moving circularly at a constant speed while constrained by mechanical force, such as moving at constant speed in a frictionless ideal centrifuge.
Work done by a variable force
editCalculating the work as "force times straight path segment" would only apply in the most simple of circumstances, as noted above. If force is changing, or if the body is moving along a curved path, possibly rotating and not necessarily rigid, then only the path of the application point of the force is relevant for the work done, and only the component of the force parallel to the application pointvelocityis doing work (positive work when in the same direction, and negative when in the opposite direction of the velocity). This component of force can be described by the scalar quantity calledscalar tangential component(Fcos(θ),whereθis the angle between the force and the velocity). And then the most general definition of work can be formulated as follows:
If the force varies (e.g. compressing a spring) we need to use calculus to find the work done. If the force as a variable ofxis given byF(x),then the work done by the force along the x-axis fromx1tox2is:
Thus, the work done for a variable force can be expressed as adefinite integralof force over displacement.[20]
If the displacement as a variable of time is given by∆x(t),then work done by the variable force fromt1tot2is:
Thus, the work done for a variable force can be expressed as a definite integral ofpowerover time.
Torque and rotation
editAforce coupleresults from equal and opposite forces, acting on two different points of a rigid body. The sum (resultant) of these forces may cancel, but their effect on the body is the couple or torqueT.The work of the torque is calculated as where theT⋅ωis the power over the instantdt.The sum of these small amounts of work over the trajectory of the rigid body yields the work, This integral is computed along the trajectory of the rigid body with an angular velocityωthat varies with time, and is therefore said to bepath dependent.
If the angular velocity vector maintains a constant direction, then it takes the form, whereis the angle of rotation about the constant unit vectorS.In this case, the work of the torque becomes, whereCis the trajectory fromto.This integral depends on the rotational trajectory,and is therefore path-dependent.
If the torqueis aligned with the angular velocity vector so that, and both the torque and angular velocity are constant, then the work takes the form,[2]
This result can be understood more simply by considering the torque as arising from a force of constant magnitudeF,being applied perpendicularly to a lever arm at a distance,as shown in the figure. This force will act through the distance along the circular arc,so the work done is Introduce the torqueτ=Fr,to obtain as presented above.
Notice that only the component of torque in the direction of the angular velocity vector contributes to the work.
Work and potential energy
editThe scalar product of a forceFand the velocityvof its point of application defines thepowerinput to a system at an instant of time. Integration of this power over the trajectory of the point of application,C=x(t),defines the work input to the system by the force.
Path dependence
editTherefore, theworkdone by a forceFon an object that travels along a curveCis given by theline integral: wheredx(t)defines the trajectoryCandvis the velocity along this trajectory. In general this integral requires that the path along which the velocity is defined, so the evaluation of work is said to be path dependent.
The time derivative of the integral for work yields the instantaneous power,
Path independence
editIf the work for an applied force is independent of the path, then the work done by the force, by thegradient theorem,defines a potential function which is evaluated at the start and end of the trajectory of the point of application. This means that there is a potential functionU(x),that can be evaluated at the two pointsx(t1)andx(t2)to obtain the work over any trajectory between these two points. It is tradition to define this function with a negative sign so that positive work is a reduction in the potential, that is
The functionU(x)is called thepotential energyassociated with the applied force. The force derived from such a potential function is said to beconservative.Examples of forces that have potential energies are gravity and spring forces.
In this case, thegradientof work yields and the forceFis said to be "derivable from a potential."[21]
Because the potentialUdefines a forceFat every pointxin space, the set of forces is called aforce field.The power applied to a body by a force field is obtained from the gradient of the work, or potential, in the direction of the velocityVof the body, that is
Work by gravity
editIn the absence of other forces, gravity results in a constant downward acceleration of every freely moving object. Near Earth's surface the acceleration due to gravity isg= 9.8 m⋅s−2and the gravitational force on an object of massmisFg=mg.It is convenient to imagine this gravitational force concentrated at thecenter of massof the object.
If an object with weightmgis displaced upwards or downwards a vertical distancey2−y1,the workWdone on the object is: whereFgis weight (pounds in imperial units, and newtons in SI units), and Δyis the change in heighty.Notice that the work done by gravity depends only on the vertical movement of the object. The presence of friction does not affect the work done on the object by its weight.
In space
editThe force of gravity exerted by a massMon another massmis given by whereris the position vector fromMtomandr̂is the unit vector in the direction ofr.
Let the massmmove at the velocityv;then the work of gravity on this mass as it moves from positionr(t1)tor(t2)is given by Notice that the position and velocity of the massmare given by whereerandetare the radial and tangential unit vectors directed relative to the vector fromMtom,and we use the fact thatUse this to simplify the formula for work of gravity to, This calculation uses the fact that The function is the gravitational potential function, also known asgravitational potential energy.The negative sign follows the convention that work is gained from a loss of potential energy.
Work by a spring
editConsider a spring that exerts a horizontal forceF= (−kx,0, 0)that is proportional to its deflection in thexdirection independent of how a body moves. The work of this spring on a body moving along the space with the curveX(t) = (x(t),y(t),z(t)),is calculated using its velocity,v= (vx,vy,vz),to obtain For convenience, consider contact with the spring occurs att= 0,then the integral of the product of the distancexand the x-velocity,xvxdt,over timetis1/2x2.The work is the product of the distance times the spring force, which is also dependent on distance; hence thex2result.
Work by a gas
editThe workdone by a body of gas on its surroundings is: wherePis pressure,Vis volume, andaandbare initial and final volumes.
Work–energy principle
editThe principle of work andkinetic energy(also known as thework–energy principle) states thatthe work done by all forces acting on a particle (the work of the resultant force) equals the change in the kinetic energy of the particle.[22]That is, the workWdone by theresultant forceon aparticleequals the change in the particle's kinetic energy,[2] whereandare thespeedsof the particle before and after the work is done, andmis itsmass.
The derivation of thework–energy principlebegins withNewton's second law of motionand the resultant force on a particle. Computation of the scalar product of the force with the velocity of the particle evaluates the instantaneous power added to the system.[23] (Constraints define the direction of movement of the particle by ensuring there is no component of velocity in the direction of the constraint force. This also means the constraint forces do not add to the instantaneous power.) The time integral of this scalar equation yields work from the instantaneous power, and kinetic energy from the scalar product of acceleration with velocity. The fact that the work–energy principle eliminates the constraint forces underliesLagrangian mechanics.[24]
This section focuses on the work–energy principle as it applies to particle dynamics. In more general systems work can change thepotential energyof a mechanical device, the thermal energy in a thermal system, or theelectrical energyin an electrical device. Work transfers energy from one place to another or one form to another.
Derivation for a particle moving along a straight line
editIn the case theresultant forceFis constant in both magnitude and direction, and parallel to the velocity of the particle, the particle is moving with constant accelerationaalong a straight line.[25]The relation between the net force and the acceleration is given by the equationF=ma(Newton's second law), and the particledisplacementscan be expressed by the equation which follows from(seeEquations of motion).
The work of the net force is calculated as the product of its magnitude and the particle displacement. Substituting the above equations, one obtains:
Other derivation:
In the general case of rectilinear motion, when the net forceFis not constant in magnitude, but is constant in direction, and parallel to the velocity of the particle, the work must be integrated along the path of the particle:
General derivation of the work–energy principle for a particle
editFor any net force acting on a particle moving along any curvilinear path, it can be demonstrated that its work equals the change in the kinetic energy of the particle by a simple derivation analogous to the equation above. It is known asthe work–energy principle:
The identityrequires some algebra. From the identityand definition it follows
The remaining part of the above derivation is just simple calculus, same as in the preceding rectilinear case.
Derivation for a particle in constrained movement
editIn particle dynamics, a formula equating work applied to a system to its change in kinetic energy is obtained as a first integral ofNewton's second law of motion.It is useful to notice that the resultant force used in Newton's laws can be separated into forces that are applied to the particle and forces imposed by constraints on the movement of the particle. Remarkably, the work of a constraint force is zero, therefore only the work of the applied forces need be considered in the work–energy principle.
To see this, consider a particle P that follows the trajectoryX(t)with a forceFacting on it. Isolate the particle from its environment to expose constraint forcesR,then Newton's Law takes the form wheremis the mass of the particle.
Vector formulation
editNote that n dots above a vector indicates its nthtime derivative. Thescalar productof each side of Newton's law with the velocity vector yields because the constraint forces are perpendicular to the particle velocity. Integrate this equation along its trajectory from the pointX(t1)to the pointX(t2)to obtain
The left side of this equation is the work of the applied force as it acts on the particle along the trajectory from timet1to timet2.This can also be written as This integral is computed along the trajectoryX(t)of the particle and is therefore path dependent.
The right side of the first integral of Newton's equations can be simplified using the following identity (seeproduct rulefor derivation). Now it is integrated explicitly to obtain the change in kinetic energy, where the kinetic energy of the particle is defined by the scalar quantity,
Tangential and normal components
editIt is useful to resolve the velocity and acceleration vectors into tangential and normal components along the trajectoryX(t),such that where Then, thescalar productof velocity with acceleration in Newton's second law takes the form where the kinetic energy of the particle is defined by the scalar quantity,
The result is the work–energy principle for particle dynamics, This derivation can be generalized to arbitrary rigid body systems.
Moving in a straight line (skid to a stop)
editConsider the case of a vehicle moving along a straight horizontal trajectory under the action of a driving force and gravity that sum toF.The constraint forces between the vehicle and the road defineR,and we have For convenience let the trajectory be along the X-axis, soX= (d,0)and the velocity isV= (v,0),thenR⋅V= 0,andF⋅V=Fxv,whereFxis the component ofFalong the X-axis, so Integration of both sides yields IfFxis constant along the trajectory, then the integral of velocity is distance, so
As an example consider a car skidding to a stop, wherekis the coefficient of friction andWis the weight of the car. Then the force along the trajectory isFx= −kW.The velocityvof the car can be determined from the lengthsof the skid using the work–energy principle, This formula uses the fact that the mass of the vehicle ism=W/g.
Coasting down an inclined surface (gravity racing)
editConsider the case of a vehicle that starts at rest and coasts down an inclined surface (such as mountain road), the work–energy principle helps compute the minimum distance that the vehicle travels to reach a velocityV,of say 60 mph (88 fps). Rolling resistance and air drag will slow the vehicle down so the actual distance will be greater than if these forces are neglected.
Let the trajectory of the vehicle following the road beX(t)which is a curve in three-dimensional space. The force acting on the vehicle that pushes it down the road is the constant force of gravityF= (0, 0,W),while the force of the road on the vehicle is the constraint forceR.Newton's second law yields, Thescalar productof this equation with the velocity,V= (vx,vy,vz),yields whereVis the magnitude ofV.The constraint forces between the vehicle and the road cancel from this equation becauseR⋅V= 0,which means they do no work. Integrate both sides to obtain The weight forceWis constant along the trajectory and the integral of the vertical velocity is the vertical distance, therefore, Recall that V(t1)=0. Notice that this result does not depend on the shape of the road followed by the vehicle.
In order to determine the distance along the road assume the downgrade is 6%, which is a steep road. This means the altitude decreases 6 feet for every 100 feet traveled—for angles this small the sin and tan functions are approximately equal. Therefore, the distancesin feet down a 6% grade to reach the velocityVis at least This formula uses the fact that the weight of the vehicle isW=mg.
Work of forces acting on a rigid body
editThe work of forces acting at various points on a single rigid body can be calculated from the work of aresultant force and torque.To see this, let the forcesF1,F2,...,Fnact on the pointsX1,X2,...,Xnin a rigid body.
The trajectories ofXi,i= 1,...,nare defined by the movement of the rigid body. This movement is given by the set of rotations [A(t)] and the trajectoryd(t) of a reference point in the body. Let the coordinatesxii= 1,...,ndefine these points in the moving rigid body'sreference frameM,so that the trajectories traced in the fixed frameFare given by
The velocity of the pointsXialong their trajectories are whereωis the angular velocity vector obtained from the skew symmetric matrix known as the angular velocity matrix.
The small amount of work by the forces over the small displacementsδrican be determined by approximating the displacement byδr=vδtso or
This formula can be rewritten to obtain whereFandTare theresultant force and torqueapplied at the reference pointdof the moving frameMin the rigid body.
References
edit- ^NCERT(2020)."Physics Book"(PDF).ncert.nic.in.Retrieved24 November2021.
- ^abcHugh D. Young & Roger A. Freedman (2008).University Physics(12th ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 329.ISBN978-0-321-50130-1.
- ^abKrebs, Robert E. (2004).Groundbreaking Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Middle Ages.Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 163.ISBN978-0-313-32433-8.Retrieved2008-05-21.
- ^Stephen, Donald; Lowell Cardwell (2001).Wheels, clocks, and rockets: a history of technology.US: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 85–87.ISBN978-0-393-32175-3.
- ^Mendelson, Kenneth S. (2003-02-13)."Physical and colloquial meanings of the term" work "".American Journal of Physics.71(3): 279–281.doi:10.1119/1.1522707.ISSN0002-9505.
- ^Descartes, R. (2013) [Letter to Huygens, Oct 5, 1637]. Bennett, J. (ed.).Selected correspondence of Descartes(PDF).p. 50.
- ^Iltis, C. (1971)."Leibniz and the vis viva controversy"(PDF).Isis.62(1): 21–35 (specifically p. 24).doi:10.1086/350705.S2CID143652761.
- ^Smeaton, John (1759)."Experimental Enquiry Concerning the Natural Powers of Water and Wind to Turn Mills and Other Machines Depending on a Circular Motion".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.51:105.doi:10.1098/rstl.1759.0019.S2CID186213498.
- ^Jammer, Max (1957).Concepts of Force.Dover Publications, Inc. p. 167; footnote 14.ISBN0-486-40689-X.
- ^Coriolis, Gustave (1829).Calculation of the Effect of Machines, or Considerations on the Use of Engines and their Evaluation.Carilian-Goeury, Libraire (Paris).
- ^Dugas, R. (1955).A History of Mechanics.Switzerland: Éditions du Griffon. p. 128.
- ^"Units with special names and symbols; units that incorporate special names and symbols".The International System of Units (SI)(8th ed.).International Bureau of Weights and Measures.2006. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-04-20.Retrieved2012-10-27.
- ^abMcGrath, Kimberley A., ed. (May 5, 2010).World of physics(1st ed.). Detroit: Gale. Work and potential energy.ISBN978-0-7876-3651-7.
- ^abWalker, Jearl; Halliday, David; Resnick, Robert (2011).Fundamentals of physics(9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. p. 154.ISBN9780470469118.
- ^Goldstein, Herbert (2002).Classical mechanics(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley.ISBN978-0-201-65702-9.OCLC47056311.
- ^Rogalski, Mircea S. (2018).Advanced University Physics(2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.ISBN9781351991988.
- ^ab"The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. I Ch. 14: Work and Potential Energy (conclusion)".feynmanlectures.caltech.edu.
- ^Greenwood, Donald T. (1997).Classical dynamics.Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.ISBN9780486138794.
- ^abResnick, Robert, Halliday, David (1966),Physics,Section 1–3 (Vol I and II, Combined edition), Wiley International Edition, Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 66-11527
- ^"MindTap - Cengage Learning".ng.cengage.com.Retrieved2023-10-16.
- ^Taylor, John R. (2005).Classical Mechanics.University Science Books.ISBN978-1-891389-22-1.
- ^Andrew Pytel; Jaan Kiusalaas (2010).Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics – SI Version, Volume 2(3rd ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 654.ISBN9780495295631.
- ^Paul, Burton (1979).Kinematics and Dynamics of Planar Machinery.Prentice-Hall.ISBN978-0-13-516062-6.
- ^Whittaker, E. T.(1904).A treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies.Cambridge University Press.
- ^"Work–energy principle".www.wwu.edu.Archived fromthe originalon 2012-05-30.Retrieved2012-08-06.
Bibliography
edit- Serway, Raymond A.; Jewett, John W. (2004).Physics for Scientists and Engineers(6th ed.). Brooks/Cole.ISBN0-534-40842-7.
- Tipler, Paul (1991).Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Mechanics(3rd ed., extended version ed.). W. H. Freeman.ISBN0-87901-432-6.