Wikipedia

Finchley Gap

TheFinchley Gap(or "Finchley depression" ) is a location centred on Church End,Finchley,in northLondon,England.As a topographical feature approximately eight kilometres wide, lying between higher ground to the north-west (Mill Hill) and to the south-east (Hampstead Heath), it has probably existed for the last one million years or more.[1]

Location of the "Finchley Gap"
Location of the "Finchley Gap"
class=notpageimage|
Location of the "Finchley Gap" (Greater London, UK).

The Finchley Gap has lower ground to the north-east (the catchment area of theRiver Lea), and the south-west (the catchment area of theRiver Brent). TheNorth Circular Road(A406) passes over the Gap, from one catchment area to the other.[2]

The geological history of the Finchey Gap, and its place in the history of academic research, makes it one of the most interesting topographical features of the London area.

The principal geological formation in the Finchley Gap region, as in much of theLondon Basin,isEoceneLondon Clay.This is mostly a stiff blue-brown clay, over 100 metres thick. In parts of this region, a relatively thin, upper part of the London Clay formation, sandier in content and known as theClaygate Beds,is also found. In certain areas of relatively limited extent, such as on the higher parts ofHarrow on the Hill,HampsteadandHighgate,the London Clay and Claygate Beds are overlain by sandy EoceneBagshot Beds.All these formations are overlain in several areas by much youngerPleistoceneformations, as explained below.[3]

From 1938 until the 1960s, it was supposed that theRiver Thamesonce flowed through the Gap, along the line of a "Middlesexloopway "running from somewhere aroundHarefieldto theHoddesdon-Warearea.[4]This supposition was later shown to be erroneous.

Prior to theAnglianglaciation, the "proto-Mole-Wey" river, a then south bank tributary of the "proto-Thames", flowed northwards from theWeald,throughRichmondand the Finchley Gap, to the Hoddesdon-Ware area. There, it joined the proto-Thames (which at that time was flowing north-eastwards, through the Vale ofSt Albans).

About 450,000 years ago, a lobe of the Anglian ice sheet advanced up the valley of the proto-Mole-Wey at least as far south as the Finchley Gap. There, the ice leftglacial driftwhich today is up to 18 metres in thickness.

Another lobe of the Anglian ice sheet moved up the Vale of St Albans, thus diverting the Thames southwards. When this happened, the proto-Mole-Wey was cut off atRichmond.

The Finchley Gap now lies on the watershed of the catchment areas of the Rivers Brent and Lea, both south-flowing tributaries of the Thames.

The "Middlesex loopway" hypothesis - Context

edit

It has been known since the nineteenth century that an ice sheet once descended from the north of England as far as north London and left behind extensive spreads oftilland other glacial deposits. Lobes of this ice sheet extended up two valleys, oriented south-west to north-east, reaching as far south as Watford and Finchley.[5]

In the early twentieth century, it was suggested that the River Thames, after descending throughOxfordshire,entering the London Basin nearGoringand running north-east from there, continued in that direction prior to the ice advance, pastWatfordand along the line of the Vale of St Albans.[6]It was concluded that the Thames must have been diverted to its more southerly course of today by the ice advance up the Vale of St Albans to Watford.[7]

These hypotheses have since been confirmed by much subsequent research, some of which is cited in this article. In fact, in the Early Pleistocene, the Thames flowed somewhat north-west of, but parallel to, today's Vale of St Albans, then continued towards NorthNorfolkon its journey to theNorth Sea.By the Middle Pleistocene, the Thames was flowing through the Vale of St Albans itself and was heading to the North Sea further south, in the Colchester area.[8][9]

The "loopway" hypothesis

edit

In 1938, it was suggested by the British geomorphologistS.W. Wooldridgethat the River Thames had been diverted from its course through the Vale of St Albans to roughly its present, more southerly, course, intwostages.[10]This two-stage hypothesis was presented again over the subsequent three decades in several publications.[11]

In the first stage, it was assumed that "local orChilternice "advanced from the north-west across the line of the Thames" in the neighbourhood of St. Albans ", thus blocking the river and forcing it to find a more southerly course. It was suggested that the Thames thus turned roughly eastwards from around Harefield, passed north of Harrow on the Hill, went through the Finchley depression, and then continued north-eastwards" to rejoin its former line near Ware ".[12](As explained below, this hypothesis of a "Chiltern" ice advance is not now accepted.)

It was later suggested that the section of the supposed "Middlesex loopway" going north-east beyond the Finchley depression "may well have originated as a... south-bank tributary of an earlier axial line of drainage even though it later served for the diverted Thames".[13]This "south-bank tributary" would have been the proto-Mole-Wey. In his 1938 paper, Wooldridge suggested that deposits which do exist in this eastern section of the "Middlesex loopway" (known today asDollis HillGravel) were "possible" gravels laid down by the Thames.[14](This too has since been shown to be a false assumption.)

The almost complete absence of any gravels which might have been deposited by the diverted Thames in the western section of the "Middlesex loopway" (between Harefield and the Finchley depression) was judged by Wooldridge to be a "slight" consideration, bearing in mind "how extensively the London Clay surface has been dissected and lowered here".[14]

The second stage in the diversion of the Thames supposedly took place "a long period of time" after the first stage.[12][15]During an ice advance referred to by Wooldridge (1938) as that of the "Eastern Drift" (and today known as that of theAnglian stage), lobes of the ice sheet advanced from the north-east along the Vale of St Albans towards Watford, and towards the Finchley depression. The Thames was diverted to a more southerly course, through Richmond, beyond the furthest reach of the Anglian ice sheet.

The "loopway" hypothesis dispelled

edit

No deposits which were unambiguously of Thames origin were ever found along the line of the "Middlesex loopway".

In the 1970s, detailed study of deposits in the Vale of St Albans led researchers to the conclusion that the River Thames never flowed through the Finchley depression. Instead, it was established that the river stayed on a course north-eastward through the Vale of St Albans until it was diverted, by the Anglian ice advance, approximately 450,000 years ago. The river was diverted to a more southerly route, roughly along the line of that followed by today's river.[16][17]

Furthermore, by the 1980s, evidence for a "Chiltern Drift" glaciation, which Wooldridge believed had diverted the Thames from the Vale of St Albans into its supposed intermediate route through the Finchley depression, had been seriously challenged.[17]And, although the pre-Anglian history of glaciations in Britain is known to be complex, and is still the subject of varying interpretations, the hypothesis of a pre-Anglian "Chiltern" glaciation is today nowhere supported.[18]

Gravels in the eastern section of the "Middlesex loopway", shown on current geological maps as "Dollis Hill Gravel", have been demonstrated to be deposits of the proto-Mole-Wey river, not of the River Thames.[16]

The "Middlesex loopway" hypothesis has thus been definitively rejected.[19]

The "proto-Mole-Wey" valley and the formation of the Finchley Gap

edit

The dissected plateau which lies to the south-east of the Vale of St Albans and north-west of the Finchley Gap, stretching fromBushey Heath,toPotters Bar,Northawand beyond, is capped over wide areas, at altitudes ranging from about 150m to 130m, by a fairly thin (average 3 metres) layer of sand and gravel known as Pebble Gravel (or, in places, Stanmore Gravel).[20]

Althoughflintis the main component of this gravel, it has been known since the late nineteenth century that it also contains in places a notable quantity ofchertderived fromLower GreensandBeds in the Weald. It was suggested early on that this "pointed to the former existence of streams from that area".[21]

S.W. Wooldridge later suggested that it was in fact "a river of major dimensions" (which) "entered from the south" that was responsible for transporting much of this chert to areas which are now north of the River Thames.[22]It was clear from the broad course which Wooldridge plotted for this river that it was an ancestor of the River Mole (and/or River Wey).

In 1994, D.R. Bridgland proposed that Pebble Gravel (or Stanmore Gravel) which is located onHarrow Weald Common(near Bushey Heath) was deposited by an ancestral Mole-Wey, and that that river was a tributary of the River Thames at a time when the latter river was flowing to the north-west of the Vale of St Albans. This could have been nearly two million years ago. He also suggested that similar gravel, located further north-east near Northaw at a slightly lower altitude, was also deposited by an ancestral Mole-Wey, but at a later date (which could have been around 1.75 million years ago).[23]

At those times, the topography of the country around today's Finchley Gap would have been very different, because the Pebble Gravel was laid down in a valley bottom, whereas today it occupies the highest ground. The relief has been inverted.

But, in 1979, P.L. Gibbard mapped younger deposits, known as Dollis Hill Gravel and named after one of the locations where this deposit is found, which were also laid down by the proto-Mole-Wey river.[24]These deposits are found at what is today the Finchley Gap, and to the north-east and south-west of it. Dollis Hill Gravel is found, for example, south-west of the Gap atHendonandHorsenden Hill,and north-east of the Gap over wide areas fromSouthgatetoGoff's Oak.[25]Today, the highest of those deposits rest at an altitude of around 100 metres (for example atMuswell HillandCockfosters). So the Finchley Gap, in the sense of being an area of lower ground lying between higher ground on either side (at Mill Hill and Hampstead Heath, both at altitudes of over 120 metres today), must have existed by the time those highest deposits of Dollis Hill Gravel were laid down.

The highest Dollis Hill Gravel deposits at 100 metres have not been dated precisely. But deposits ofGerrards CrossGravel (which were laid down by the proto-Thames) have been tentatively estimated to be nearly one million years old,[26]and such deposits have been mapped, at a similar altitude, some 8 km to the north-west nearRadlett.There is no certainty that the oldest Dollis Hill Gravel was laid down at exactly the same time as the Gerrards Cross Gravel, but the ages are probably comparable, because, in any given section of the London Basin, the altitude of river-borne Pleistocene deposits is normally closely correlated with their age.[27]

So it follows from all this that the Finchley Gap was created by the proto-Mole-Wey river, which was, and had been for some time before the Gap evolved, a south-bank tributary of the proto-Thames. It is also possible to deduce, though more cautiously, that the land where the Gap is now found first became an area of lower ground lying between higher ground on either side at least one million years ago.

The Anglian glaciation and its aftermath

edit

The only Pleistocene glaciation in Britain which produced an ice sheet that reached as far south as London was the Anglian glaciation of about 450,000 years ago. The ice sheet which then came down from the north of England (and Scandinavia) covered the greater part of East Anglia and passed over the northern part of the Chiltern Hills. When it reached as far south as Ware it divided into two lobes. One of those lobes advanced up the valley of the proto-Thames, in the Vale of St Albans, as far as Watford. The other lobe advanced up the valley of the proto-Mole-Wey at least as far south as the Finchley Gap.

Both rivers found their passage blocked. Lakes thus began to rise in front of the ice sheet. Lacustrine deposits laid down in these lakes have been identified.[28]As the water rose, it spilled over lower points along the watersheds of these valleys into adjacent valleys. In particular, rising water from the proto-Thames lake spilled over into the valley of the proto-Mole-Wey north ofUxbridge;and rising water from the lakes of both rivers spilled over into whatever valley then existed to the east, somewhere just beyond Richmond.[29][30]

The proto-Mole-Way was thus cut off around Richmond, where it joined the diverted Thames.

When the ice sheet began to melt, it left behind substantial layers of till and other glacial deposits. In particular, in the locality of the Finchley Gap, the ice left glacial deposits which today are up to 18 metres in thickness.[16]And meltwater which poured from the front and sides of the Finchley Gap ice lobe carved routes southwards, west of Hampstead Heath, towards the newly-diverted Thames. This process thus reversed the previous direction of drainage and initiated today's drainage network of the River Brent (which in its upper section, north of Hendon, is theDollis Brook), andMutton Brook.

A similar process led to the creation of the south-flowing lower section of theRiver Lea,which was able to establish a link to the diverted Thames to the east of Hampstead Heath. Drainage from the glacial till left by the ice lobe to the north-east of the Finchley Gap carved routes which led to the River Lea, thus initiating the drainage network of Bounds Green Brook andPymmes Brook.[31]

Thus, during the latter part of the Anglian stage and subsequently, the topography of the Finchley Gap area was transformed. From having been a section of valley floor into which drainage flowed (at the time of the proto-Mole-Wey river), it became a relatively elevated area of land (on glacial till) from which drainage flows into nearby streams. But it is still a "gap" or "depression" today in the sense that it is an area of lower ground which lies between higher ground to the north-west and south-east.[32]

Notes and references

edit
  1. ^The term "Finchley Gap" has been used in archeological literature - for example, in Collins, D. (1976),The Archaeology of the London area: current knowledge and problems,Issue 1 of Special paper, Volume 1 of Occasional Publications, London and Middlesex Archaeological Society; and in Roe, D.A. (2014),The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Britain,Volume 46, Routledge,ISBN9781317600244,page 140. The term "Finchley depression" has been used in geomorphological literature, as in various references cited in this article, notably Wooldridge (1938).
  2. ^See the online topographic map attopographic-map (London)for a clear picture of the current topography of the region around the Finchley Gap.
  3. ^SeeBGS Geology Viewer(British Geological Survey) for more information on the distribution of all the geological formations mentioned in this article.
  4. ^The term "Finchley Depression" has sometimes been used to refer to a more extensive area extending to the north-east of Church End, along the eastern section of the "Middlesex loopway". For the purpose of this article, the terms "Finchley Gap" and "Finchley Depression" are given the more limited definition cited above.
  5. ^Nineteenth century studies of glacial deposits in the Vale of St Albans and near the Finchley Gap include: Prestwich, Joseph,On the Occurrence of the Boulder Clay, or Northern Clay Drift, at Bricket Wood, Near Watford,The Geologist, June 1858, page 241; Walker, H. (1871),On the glacial drifts of North London,Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 2, page 289; and Goodchild, J.G. and Woodward H.B. (1887),Excursion to Whetstone and Finchley,Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 10, page 145.
  6. ^Salter, A.E. (1905),On the superficial deposits of central and parts of southern England,Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 19, pages 1–56.
  7. ^Sherlock, R.L. and Noble, A.H. (1912),On the glacial origin of the clay-with-flints of Buckinghamshire, and on the former course of the Thames.Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 68, pages 199–212.
  8. ^Maddy, D. Bridgland, D. and Westaway R.Uplift-driven valley incision and climate-controlled river terrace development in the Thames Valley, UK.Quaternary International, 79, 1, 2001, Pages 23-36.
  9. ^Bridgland, D.R. (1994, 2012),Quaternary of the Thames,Geological Conservation Review Series, Springer Science & Business Media, ISBN 978-94-010-4303-8, ISBN 978-94-011-0705-1 (eBook) (originally published by Chapman and Hall); especially chapters 1 and 5.
  10. ^Wooldridge, S.W. (1938),The glaciation of the London Basin, and the evolution of the Lower Thames drainage system.Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 94, pages 627–64.
  11. ^In, for example, Wooldridge, S.W. and Linton, D.L. (1955),Structure, surface and drainage in South-East England(first published in 1939), Philip, London (text online atarchive.org); and in Holmes, A. (1965),Principles of physical geology,Nelson, page 709. In archaeological literature, the notion that the Thames once flowed through the Finchley Gap persisted for even longer - as in Roe (2014).
  12. ^abWooldridge (1938) page 658.
  13. ^Wooldridge and Linton (1955), page 133.
  14. ^abWooldridge (1938) page 653.
  15. ^Holmes (1965) went so far as to suggest that the Thames flowed through the Finchley depression "for perhaps half a million years", from about 1.25m years ago, to about 750,000 years ago. This has since been shown not to be the case.
  16. ^abcGibbard, P.L. (1979),Middle Pleistocene drainage in the Thames Valley,Geological Magazine Volume 116, Issue 1 January 1979.
  17. ^abBridgland, D.R. (1994, 2012),Quaternary of the Thames.
  18. ^Lee, J.R., Rose J. and others (2011),The Glacial History of the British Isles during the Early and Middle Pleistocene: Implications for the long-term development of the British Ice Sheet,pages 59-74 inQuaternary Glaciations - Extent and Chronology, a Closer Look.Developments in Quaternary Science, 15, (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
  19. ^Given that, in particular, no Thames-borne deposits were ever found along the Middlesex loopway, and thus that no hard evidence for the loopway hypothesis was ever put forward, it might be wondered why that erroneous hypothesis held sway for over thirty years, without seemingly being publicly questioned or subject to further research. One reason is probably that Wooldridge was seen as the most prominent person in his field, and was understandably held in very high regard by his colleagues and contemporaries. Wooldridge died in 1963, and in a 1964 obituary published by the Royal Society (online atroyalsocietypublishing.org), J. H. Taylor wrote that Wooldridge was the "doyen of British geomorphologists... His publications on the physical geology of south-eastern England are outstanding contributions to science". Wooldridge was also described as "one of the outstanding figures in British geography during the twentieth century." (Balchin, W.G.V.,Geographers Biobibliographical Studies,volume 8 (1984), online atbooks.google.fr). A second reason is perhaps that Wooldridge in 1938 put forward his loopway hypothesis (and the associated Chiltern ice advance hypothesis), not just as tentative ideas worthy of further investigation, but in terms that suggested they were almost indisputable facts. He had become "convinced after long consideration" of their veracity. He wrote in his 1938 paper: "We may assume thatthe... Chiltern ice finally advanced athwart the main drainage course in the neighbourhood of St Albans, thus blocking the old route. "And:"Certain it isthat the Watford Gaps were initiated at about this time "(the supposed time of the" Chiltern ice ")" and the drainage passed thence southward and finally eastward... via the Finchley depression to rejoin its former line near Ware ". Wooldridge never wavered from this certainty. In 1955, referring to a pre-Anglian deposit of Thames gravel which he called the" Lower Gravel Train "and which extends from just beyond Goring Gap to Harefield, he wrote:"There seems little doubtthat it was by way of this trough (ie, the western part of the "Middlesex loopway" ) that the Lower Gravel Train... passed eastwards "- and that therefore the pre-Anglian Thames passed along that route.
  20. ^Stanmore Gravel Formation,British Geological Survey Lexicon of Named Rock Units.
  21. ^Humphreys, G. (1905),Excursion to Hampstead,Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, Volume 19, Issue 5, pages 243-245 (remark by A.E. Salter, page 243). Patches of Pebble Gravel also occur on the summit of Hampstead Heath, at an altitude of about 135 metres, where they overlie Eocene Bagshot Sand. (The more extensive deposits of Pebble Gravel which are found to the north-west of the Finchley Gap lie directly on London Clay and Claygate Beds.)
  22. ^Wooldridge, S.W. (1927),The Pliocene Period in western Essex and the preglacial topography of the district,Essex Naturalist, 21, page 247; online atessexfieldclub.org.uk.
  23. ^Bridgland, D.R. (1994, 2012),Quaternary of the Thames,Chapter 3, Part1,Harrow Weald Common.Bridgland suggested that the Stanmore Gravel could have been contemporary with the Stoke Row Gravel of the proto-Thames. In Lee, J.R., Rose J. and others (2011), it was suggested that the Stoke Row terrace was ofMarine Isotope Stage68 age, about 1.9 million years ago. Lee, etc also suggested that the Westland Green terrace of the proto-Thames (which Bridgland suggested was of the same age as the Northaw gravel) was of MIS 62-54 age, around 1.8-1.6 Mya.
  24. ^When the Dollis Hill Gravel was laid down, the River Wey would have been flowing across the North Downs at Guildford, and the River Mole would have crossed at Dorking - as now in both cases. Gibbard (1979) suggested that the two rivers were "confluent near Weybridge and from there flowed north-eastwards to Finchley going on to join the Thames east of Ware". Today, of course, the two rivers stay apart right up to their respective junctions with the River Thames at Weybridge and Hampton Court.
  25. ^Gibbard (1979) found deposits of Dollis Hill Gravel up to six metres thick in the vicinity of the Finchley Gap. According to the British Geological Survey (Lexicon of Names Rock Units), Dollis Hill Gravel generally can be up to 15 metres thick.
  26. ^Lee, J.R., Rose J. and others (2011) - MIS 22, about 0.9 Mya.
  27. ^This age-altitude correlation principle is illustrated in, for example, Figure 3.2, Bridgland (1994, 2012), Chapter 3,Idealized transverse section through the classic Middle Thames sequence of the Slough-Beaconsfield area,with the oldest Thames gravels at an altitude of over 150 metres, and the youngest at almost sea level.
  28. ^Gibbard (1979) found in the Finchley area "a persistent bed of varve-like laminated silty clay or sandy silt up to 1.5 metres thick", lying between Dollis Hill Gravel (below) and glacial till (above). He concluded that this sediment accumulated in an ice-dammed lake which was later overriden by the advancing ice sheet. Sediments of a similar nature and disposition have been found in the Vale of St Albans (Bridgland (1994, 2012), Chapter 3,Moor Mill Quarry).
  29. ^Gibbard, P.L. (1985),The Pleistocene history of the Middle Thames Valley,Cambridge University Press, page 135. Deposits of "Black Park Gravel", which are identified on currentgeological maps,and which were laid down by the Thames after it was diverted southwards, indicate the approximate route then taken by the Thames, between Uxbridge and Richmond.
  30. ^The above summary concerning Anglian ice sheet movements is accurate as far as it goes, but in reality the processes of glaciation and river diversion were more complex than in this summary. For example, four separate ice advances of the Anglan glaciation in this area have been identified (Bridgland (1994, 2012),Westmill Quarry).
  31. ^Similarly, as the Vale of St Albans ice sheet lobe melted and retreated north-eastwards from Watford, meltwater which poured from the front of that lobe carved a route to the south to join the newly-diverted Thames, thus reversing the previous direction of drainage and initiating today'sRiver Colne.See Bridgland (1994, 2012), Chapter 3,Moor Mill Quarry.Rivers flowing down the Chilterndip slopefrom the north-west such as theGadeandChess,which were previously left-bank tributaries of the north-east-flowing Thames, became right-bank tributaries of the south-flowing Colne.
  32. ^It may also be noted that the geological map shows that outcrops of Dollis Hill Gravel to the west and south of the Finchley Gap are relatively few in number and are confined to relatively small areas, such as on the crests of isolated hills like Horsenden Hill and Dollis Hill itself, whereas east and north of the Finchley Gap the remaining Dollis Hill Gravel covers notably wider areas, including the areas under expanses of remaining glacial till in North and East Finchley, and east ofCuffley.However, prior to the Anglian glaciation, the proto-Mole-Wey river must have laid down deposits of Dollis Hill Gravel which covered similar extents both west and east of the Finchley Gap. The reason for the difference in extent today is because the pre-Anglian Dollis Hill Gravel west of the Finchley Gap was subject to much more erosion during and after the Anglian Stage than the pre-Anglian Dollis Hill Gravel east of the Finchley Gap. The eastern Dollis Hill Gravel was first protected by the ice lobe which covered it. As Wooldridge (1938, pages 659-60) first recognised, that ice lobe had little if any erosive power, so not much of the Dollis Hill Gravel which it overrode would have been removed by the ice. And after that ice lobe melted and retreated, much of the eastern Dollis Hill Gravel was protected by a covering of glacial till left behind by the ice. By contrast, the western Dollis Hill Gravel was left open to erosion in various ways - by trapped water which was rising in front of the ice lobe, by proto-Thames water overflowing gaps in the watershed between the proto-Thames and proto-Mole-Wey catchments, and then by meltwater pouring from the snout of the retreating ice lobe. And a little further south, all previous Dollis Hill Gravel was removed by the surging waters of the newly-diverted Thames.

51°36′N0°12′W/ 51.6°N 0.2°W/51.6; -0.2

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finchley_Gap&oldid=1251165981"