TheAMD K8 Hammer,alsocode-namedSledgeHammer, is acomputer processormicroarchitecturedesigned byAMDas the successor to theAMD K7 Athlonmicroarchitecture. The K8 was the first implementation of theAMD6464-bitextension to thex86instruction set architecture.[1][2]

K8 - Hammer
General information
Launchedlate 2003
DiscontinuedApril 2014
Common manufacturer
Performance
Max.CPUclock rate1600 MHz to 3200 MHz
FSBspeeds800 MHz to 1000 MHz
Architecture and classification
Technology node130 nm to 65 nm
Instruction setAMD64(x86-64)
Physical specifications
Sockets
Products, models, variants
Core names
History
PredecessorK7 - Athlon
SuccessorFamily 10h (K10)

Features

edit

Processors

edit

Processors based on the K8 core include:

The K8 core is very similar to the K7. The most radical change is the integration of the AMD64 instructions and an on-chip memory controller. The memory controller drastically reduces memory latency and is largely responsible for most of the performance gains from K7 to K8.

Nomenclature

edit

It is perceived by the PC community that after the use of thecodenameK8for theAthlon 64processor family, AMD no longer uses K-nomenclatures (which originally stood forKryptonite[3]) since no K-nomenclature naming convention beyondK8has appeared in official AMD documents and press releases after the beginning of 2005. AMD now refers to the codenameK8processors as theFamily 0Fhprocessors. 10h and 0Fh refer to the main result of theCPUIDx86processor instruction. Inhexadecimalnumbering, 0F(h) (where thehrepresents hexadecimal numbering) equals thedecimalnumber 15, and 10(h) equals the decimal number 16. (The "K10h" form that sometimes pops up is an improper hybrid of the "K" code andFamilyidentifier number.)

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^"List of AMD CPU microarchitectures - LeonStudio".LeonStudio - CodeFun.3 August 2014. Archived fromthe originalon 26 September 2020.Retrieved12 September2015.
  2. ^Hans de Vries (2 October 2001)."AMD's Next Generation Micro Processor's Architecture".Chip Architect.Retrieved12 September2015.
  3. ^Hesseldahl, Arik (2000-07-06)."Why Cool Chip Code Names Die".forbes.Retrieved2007-07-14.