Wikipedia

Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System

(Redirected fromAegis Ashore)

TheAegis ballistic missile defense system(Aegis BMDorABMD),[1]also known asSea-Based Midcourse,is aMissile Defense Agencyprogram under theUnited States Department of Defensedeveloped to providemissile defenseagainst short and intermediate-rangeballistic missiles.The program is part of theUnited States national missile defensestrategy and EuropeanNATO missile defense system.[2]

The motto inLatin:Custos Custodum Ipsorummeans "Guard of the Guardians Themselves" in English

Aegis BMD is an expansion of theAegis combat systemdeployed onwarships,designed to intercept ballistic missiles inmid-course phase(i.e., after the rocket burn has completed but prior to reentry into the atmosphere). Aegis BMD-equipped vessels can engage potential threats using theStandard Missile 3mid-course interceptors and theStandard Missile 2andStandard Missile 6terminal-phase interceptors.[3][4][5]

History and technical development

edit

Origins

edit
Standard Missile - 3 (SM-3) is launched from cruiserUSSLake Eriein November 2005

The current effort to deploy Aegis ballistic missile defense (ABMD) was begun during the mid-1980s as part of PresidentRonald Reagan'sStrategic Defense Initiative(SDI). The SDI plan was initially for a space-basedrailgunsystem. However, technological constraints caused the system to be transformed into a surface-based system known as theLightweight Exo-Atmospheric Projectile(LEAP). The original testing of the LEAP was done as part of the Army LEAP program.

Later, SDIO worked with the Navy to test the LEAP on theTerriermissile. The Terrier LEAP demonstration program lasted from 1991 into 1995 and consisted of four flight tests. Two of these were intercept tests in early 1995; both failed to intercept—the first had a software error in the second-stage booster, the second had asquib(pyrotechnic switch to connect power) in the kinetic kill vehicle that was mounted backwards and failed to fire.

Program history and development

edit

During the late 1990s, theU.S. Navywas tasked to provide a weapon system for exploratory testing of LEAP. This phase was designated the Aegis LEAP Intercept (ALI) program. The program was for two successful intercepts in five attempts. On June 13, 2002, the second successful ALI intercept occurred during the FM-3 flight test mission. Initial Aegis BMD success may have contributed to PresidentGeorge W. Bush's decision to deploy an emergency ballistic missile capability by late 2004.

Upon the completion of the ALI program, Aegis BMD was transitioned to the production phase. The first Block I productionSM-3was delivered in October 2004, and the Aegis 3.0 update was delivered in 2005.

This system was given major new importance by President Obama in September 2009, when he announced plans to scrap the plans for amissile defense site in Poland,in favor of missile defense systems located on U.S. Navy warships.[6][7]On 18 September 2009, Russian Prime MinisterVladimir Putinwelcomed Obama's plans for missile defense which may include stationing American Aegis armed warships in the Black Sea, as these are likely to be less effective against Russia's missile attacks.[8][9]In 2009 severalU.S. Navyships were fitted with SM-3 missiles to serve this function, which complements thePatriot systemsalready deployed by American units. Warships of Japan and Australia also have been given weapons and technology to enable them to participate as well.[10][11]

Current Aegis BMD hardware includes the SM-3 Block-1a missile and other improvements to the Aegis Weapons System. Future development of the Aegis BMD system includes Launch on Remote capability, upgraded SM-3 avionics and hardware, and an upgraded Aegis Weapon System. In 2012 Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense will merge withAegis Open Architectureand deliver the benefits of both platforms.[12]The Launch on Remote capability involves the use of off-board sensors, such as theSpace Tracking and Surveillance Systemto provide a targeting solution for a SM-3 launch.[13]

As of 2022, variations of the Aegis BMD system currently in service are the 4.x, 5.x and 6.x. The improved versions are equipped with advanced processors and software, as well as upgraded variants of the SM-3 interceptor missile.[3][unreliable source?]BMD capable ships can have their BMD capabilities upgraded from earlier versions to later versions. BMD version 6.x comes with AN/SPY-6 radar in Flight III and Flight IIA destroyers.[14]

US ArmyIntegrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System(IBCS) program will integrateMIM-104 Patriot,NASAMS,AN/TPY-2andF-35 Lightning IIradars with Aegis radars to create aplug and fightnetwork of land, sea, and air-based sensors and aid surface-to-air Patriot andTHAADlaunchers in anti-ballistic missile capabilities.

SM-3, SM-2 Block IV, SM-6 and GPI interceptors

edit
SM-3 Interceptor profile
Main articles:RIM-156 SM-2ER Block IV,RIM-161 Standard Missile 3,andRIM-174 Standard ERAM

The Aegis BMD uses theRIM-161 Standard Missile 3mid-course interceptors and theRIM-156 Standard Extended Range Block IV(SM-2ER Block IV) terminal-phase interceptors developed by Raytheon. The Standard Missile 3 is a development of the SM2-ER Block IV, capable of intercepting ballistic missiles above the atmosphere (i.e., exo-atmospheric intercept) during the midcourse phase of a hostile ballistic missile's flight. The missile is launched from theMk 41 Vertical Launching System(VLS) of the warships. It receives in-flight target updates from the ship. The kinetic warhead (KW) is designed to destroy a ballistic missile's warhead with more than 130 megajoules of kinetic energy by colliding with it. The existing SM-3 Block IA version will be upgraded to SM-3 Block IB, SM-3 Block IIA and SM-3 Block IIB to counter future ballistic missile threats.

The SM-2ER Block IV can engage the ballistic missiles within the atmosphere (i.e., endoatmospheric intercept) in the terminal phase of a missile's trajectory. The missile carries a blast fragmentation warhead. The SM-2ER Block IV was further developed in a new extended range active missile,RIM-174 Standard ERAM(Standard Missile 6), which adds anactive radar homingseeker.[3]SM-6 is a dual-capability missile that can be used for either air defense (i.e., countering aircraft and anti-ship cruise missiles) or terminal ballistic missile defense; it is not meant to replace the SM-2 series of missiles, but will serve alongside and provide extended range and increased firepower.[15]In January 2018 the Navy approved plans to develop a Dual Thrust Rocket Motor for the SM-6, with a larger 21-inch diameter to replace the current 13.5-inch propulsion package. The new rocket motor would sit atop the current 21-inch booster, producing a new variant of the missile: the SM-6 Block IB.[16]

In March 2018 the MDA announced it "is evaluating the technical feasibility of the capability of the SM-3 Block IIA missile, currently under development, against an ICBM-class target. If proven to be effective against an ICBM, this missile could add a layer of protection, augmenting the currently deployed GMD system." The MDA plans to conduct a demonstration of the SM-3 Block IIA against an ICBM-like target by the end of 2020.[16]On November 17, 2020, an SM-3 Block IIA missile successfully intercepted a threat-representative Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) target in its mid-course phase of flight, reaffirming the capability to intercept non-separating, simple separating, and complex-separating ballistic missiles.[17]

Glide Phase Interceptor(GPI) will provide defense againsthypersonic weapons.[18]Glide Phase Interceptor will be integrated with modified Baseline 9 Aegis Weapon System.[19]

In 2024, the Patriot PAC-3 was successfully tested with the Aegis system.[20]

Aegis Ashore

edit
NATO's Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System (AABMDS) site in Romania
NATO's Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System (AABMDS) site inRedzikowo,Poland

As of the2014 NATO Wales summita land-based component,Aegis Ashore,was being developed.[21]The first site to be declared operational wasDeveselu,Romania in 2016.[22]This consists of equipment commonly used by the Navy being deployed in land-based facilities. This includesSPY-1 radarsand a battery of Standard Missile-3s. TheObama administration'splans call for two sites: the first in Romania atDeveseluthat was opened in May 2015 and the second inRedzikowo,Poland (originally planned for 2018, opened in summer 2024[23]). In 2020, both will get the latest versions of the Aegis BMD software and the latest version of the SM-3.[24]Some radar facilities will be placed in Turkey at a future date.[25][26][27][28]

On 21 May 2014, U.S. DOD headlined, "Standard Missile Completes First Test Launch from Aegis Ashore Test Site," and reported that: "The Missile Defense Agency, the U.S. Navy, and sailors at the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex andPacific Missile Range Facility(PMRF), successfully conducted the first flight test involving components of the Aegis Ashore system. During the test, a simulated ballistic missile target was acquired, tracked, and engaged by the Aegis Weapon System. At approximately 7:35 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time, May 20 (1:35 a.m. EDT, May 21), the Aegis Weapon System fired a Standard Missile (SM)-3 Block IB guided missile from the Vertical Launch System. Several fire control and engagement functions were exercised during the test. A live target missile launch was not planned for this flight test. "

On 19 December 2017, theCabinet of Japanapproved a plan to purchase two Aegis Ashore systems equipped with theAN/SPY-7(V)1,based on Lockheed Martin'sLRDRto increaseJapan's self-defence capability againstNorth Korea,usingSM-3 Block IIAmissiles, and also could work withSM-6interceptors capable of shooting down cruise missiles.[29][30][31]The installation sites are at aGround Self-Defense Forcetraining area in Araya District,Akita Prefectureand the Mutsumi training area inHagi,Yamaguchi Prefecture.[32][33]

On 15 June 2020, Japanese Defense MinisterTaro Konoannounced that work had been halted on the deployment of the system because additional costs would be needed to ensure that residential buildings would not be hit by rocket boosters used to launch the missiles.[34]Later in the month Japan'sNational Security Councilconfirmed the cancellation of the plan.[35]On 23 September 2020, Lockheed Martin commented that it would be expensive to potentially convert the AA system for maritime use since a revamp in the design is required.[36]

In July 2020AdmiralPhilip S. Davidson,the head ofUnited States Indo-Pacific Commandadvised that he sought funding to construct an Aegis Ashore system inGuamby 2026 both to defend existing U.S. military facilities on Guam and to provide offensive "long-range precision strike capability into theFirst Island Chain"dominated by China.[37]Speaking in March 2021 Davidson said that the "Guam Defense System" of an Aegis Ashore Facility would free up threeArleigh Burke-class destroyersfor service elsewhere. Davidson said that Chinese submarines and surface ships together with its ballistic missiles pose "a 360-degree threat" to Guam beyond the capabilities of the existingTerminal High Altitude Area Defensesystem on Guam.[38]

Developers and Contractors

edit

Notable subcontractors and technical experts includeBoeing Defense, Space & Security,Alliant Techsystems(ATK),Honeywell,Engility,Naval Surface Warfare Center,SPAWAR Systems Center,Johns Hopkins UniversityApplied Physics Laboratory(JHU/APL), and theMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyLincoln Laboratory(Lincoln Lab).

Deployment

edit

Aegis Ashore

edit

The U.S., Romania and Poland have deployed the land based Aegis BMD. Test installation was built at the USPacific Missile Range FacilityinHawaiiin 2000s. AsiteinDeveselu,Romaniahas been operational since 2016, while a site atRedzikowo,Polandhas been operational since the summer of 2024.[39][40][23]Though Japan intended to deploy two sites which would use anAN/SPY-7AESA radar, these plans were cancelled in 2020. Possible deployments of Aegis Ashore include US Naval BaseGuam.[14]

U.S. Navy Aegis BMD vessels

edit

As of October 2017, there were 5Ticonderoga-class cruisersand 28Arleigh Burke-class destroyers(DDGs 51–78) of the US Navy'sArleigh Burke-class destroyers equipped with BMD in the U.S. Navy. Of the 33 ships, 17 are assigned to the Pacific Fleet and 16 to the Atlantic Fleet.[41]The Navy's FY2015 30-year (FY2015-FY2043) shipbuilding plan projects that the total number of Aegis cruisers and destroyers will be between 80 and 97 during the 30-year period.[42]

USSCarney(DDG-64),USSRoss(DDG-71),andUSSDonald Cook(DDG-75)were upgraded in fiscal year 2012, whileUSSCole(DDG-67),USSMcFaul(DDG-74)andUSSPorter(DDG-78)were upgraded in fiscal year 2013.

Japanese Aegis BMD vessels

edit
Artist's impression of future BMD ship (JSDF Photo)
BMD maneuvers (October 6, 2022)
JSHaguro( DDG-180 ) launching SM-3 Block IB missile (November 19, 2022)

TheJMSDFhas equipped four ships of theKongo-class destroyers for LRST and engagement:JSKongo,JSChokai,JSMyoko,and theJSKirishima(in 2010) (See table below).[43][44]Japan's foreign minister,Hirofumi Nakasoneand South Korea's Minister of Foreign Affairs,Yu Myung-hwan,agreed that early April 5, 2009, launch[45]of the North Korean Unha-2 satellite violated UN resolutions 1695 and 1718 of July 2006. Japan's cabinet examined approval of a JMSDF AEGIS BMD engagement in the event of a failure of the Taepondong launch.[46][47][48][49]The Japanese government also noted that it could bypass cabinet for an interception under Article 82, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the Self-Defence Forces law.[50]In total, five AEGIS destroyers were deployed at that time.[51]Supplemental to SM-3 capability the Japanese system incorporates an airborne component. Together discrimination between platform tests and satellite launches is possible by analyzing the angle of ascent.[52]

On August 31, 2022, theJapan Ministry of Defenseannounced that JMSDF will operate two "Aegis system equipped ships"(イージス・システム chở khách hạm in Japanese) (pictured) to replace its earlier cancellation of the Aegis Ashore program, commissioning one ship by the end of fiscal year 2027, and the other by the end of FY2028. The budget for design and other related expenses are to be submitted in the form of "item requests", without specific amounts, and the initial procurement of the lead items are expected to clear legislation by FY2023. Construction is to begin in the following year of FY2024. When completed, at 20,000 long tons (20,000 t) each, the two warships will be the largestsurface combatantships operated by Japan.[53][54][55]

On 6 October 2022, five warships from the United States, Japan, and South Korea held a multilateral ballistic missile defense exercise in theSea of Japan(pictured) as part of the military response toongoing North Korean intermediate-range ballistic missile tests over the Japanese home islands.[56][57]

On 16 November 2022, the guided-missile destroyerMayafired an SM-3 Block IIA missile, successfully intercepting the target outside the atmosphere in the first launch of the missile from a Japanese warship. On 18 November 2022, theHagurolikewise fired an SM-3 Block IB missile with a successful hit outside the atmosphere (pictured). Both test firings were conducted at the U.S.Pacific Missile Range FacilityonKauai Island,Hawaii, in cooperation with the U.S. Navy andU.S. Missile Defense Agency.This was the first time the two ships conducted SM-3 firings in the same time period, and the tests validated the ballistic missile defense capabilities of Japan's newestMaya-class destroyers.[58]

On 23 December 2022, the Japanese Ministry of Defense's 2023 budget and program guidance illustrated examples of operation ( vận dụng の đồng loạt ) for the Aegis-equipped naval forces of the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force (MSDF). The two ASEV warship would be exclusively tasked for dedicated ballistic missile defense (BDM) missions (BMD chờ ) and operate off the Korean peninsula in theSea of Japan,allowing the other Aegis guided-missile destroyers to meet other contingencies ( xâm công ngăn cản ) while operating independently to keeping thesea lines of communication(SLOC) open in theEast China Seasouthwest of the Japanese home islands.[59][60][61][62]

List of JMSDF Aegis Afloat ships (Aegis BMD vessels)
Name Hull Pennant No. Builder/Shipyard Aegis Radar Anti-Ballistic Missile Vertical Launchers Commissioned Home port Flotilla Squadron Status
Mayaclass
JSMaya DDG-179 JMU, Yokohama AN/SPY-1D(V) SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:96 cells (total) 19 March 2020 Yokosuka Escort Flotilla 1 Escort Squadron 1 Active
JSHaguro DDG-180 JMU, Yokohama AN/SPY-1D(V) SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:96 cells (total) 19 March 2021 Sasebo Escort Flotilla 4 Escort Squadron 8 Active
Atagoclass
JDSAtago DDG-177 JMU, Yokohama AN/SPY-1D(V) SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:96 cells (total) 15 March 2007 Maizuru Escort Flotilla 3 Escort Squadron 3 Active
JDSAshigara DDG-178 JMU, Yokohama AN/SPY-1D(V) SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:96 cells (total) 13 March 2008 Sasebo Escort Flotilla 2 Escort Squadron 2 Active
Kongōclass
Kongō DDG-173 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AN/SPY-1DPESA SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:90 cells (total) 25 March 1993 Sasebo Escort Flotilla 1 Escort Squadron 5: Active
Kirishima DDG-174 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AN/SPY-1DPESA SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:90 cells (total) 16 March 1995 Yokosuka Escort Flotilla 2 Escort Squadron 6 Active
Myōkō DDG-175 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AN/SPY-1DPESA SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:90 cells (total) 14 March 1996 Maizuru Escort Flotilla 3 Escort Squadron 3 Active
Chōkai DDG-176 IHI Corporation AN/SPY-1DPESA SM-3 Standard missile Mark 41:90 cells (total) 20 March 1998 Sasebo Escort Flotilla 4 Escort Squadron 8 Active

Joint BMD patrols

edit

In early October 2022, five warships from the United States, Japan, and South Korea held a ballistic missile defense exercise (pictured) in the Sea of Japan as part of the ongoing military response to ongoing North Korean intermediate-range ballistic missile tests over the Japanese home islands.[56]

Political debate

edit

Tom Laliberty of Raytheon said that PresidentBarack Obamawas forced to shift from a land based missile defense system to a sea based one because of the difficulties of coordinating with partner nations.[63]Also, the U.S. Defense Department has said it would be just one component of a wider defense which might also include ground-based facilities.[64]

A Navy panel headed by retired Vice Adm. Phillip Balisle has asserted that since the late 1990s there has been an over-emphasis on saving money, including cuts in crews and streamlined training and maintenance, which has led to a drastic decline in readiness, and has left Aegis combat systems in low state of readiness.[65]And in spite of a reduction in the objective for the number of Aegis armed warships to field, the U.S. Navy will still fall short of this reduced objective under the fiscal year for 2012 shipbuilding plan for the next 30 years.[66]

International reaction

edit

The Russian government has claimed that the system is "fueling a new arms race", and is constructed "on ridiculous fabricated pretexts" of protection against non-existent threats of the so-calledrogue states.Dmitry Rogozin,the Deputy Prime Minister of theRussian government,said in 2012 that the country would "react in the sharpest manner" to any American ships armed with the system found near their shores.[67]

Other capabilities

edit
Main article:USA 193 § Destruction

The Aegis BMD system, coupled with theRIM-161 Standardmissile (SM-3), has also demonstrated a limited capability as ananti-satellite weaponagainst satellites in the lower portion oflow Earth orbit.On February 20, 2008,USA 193was destroyed by a group of Aegis ships in the Pacific; the stated reason was concern that satellite'shydrazinepayload might contaminate land area upon re-entry from an uncontrolled orbit. The launching vessel wasUSSLake Erie,and one SM-3 missile was used. Interception was at an altitude of 133 nautical miles (247 kilometers).

Target for simulating endo-atmospheric flight of DF-21 ASBM

edit

According to a Congressional Research Service report dated July 31, 2014,[14]the lack of a test target simulating the ChineseDF-21ASBM is highlighted.

A threat representative Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) target for operational open-air testing has become an immediate test resource need. China is fielding the DF-21D ASBM, which threatens U.S. and allied surface warships in the Western Pacific. While the Missile Defense Agency has exo-atmospheric targets in development, no program currently exists for an endo-atmospheric target. The endo-atmospheric ASBM target is the Navy's responsibility, but it is not currently budgeted. The Missile Defense Agency estimates the non-recurring expense to develop the exo-atmospheric target was $30 million with each target costing an additional $30 million; the endo-atmospheric target will be more expensive to produce according to missile defense analysts. Numerous Navy acquisition programs will require an ASBM surrogate in the coming years, although a limited number of targets (3-5) may be sufficient to validate analytical models

The December 2012 report from DOT&E (i.e., DOT&E's annual report for FY2012) did not further discuss this issue; a January 21, 2013, press report stated that this is because the details of the issue are classified.

The U.S. arsenal has a "variety of potential countermeasures" and the "kill chain" of for example a potentialDF-21Dattack would be so "complicated" that it would provide a "number of opportunities to defeat the attack". He also stated that unless one country integrates an "entire system of systems" to make this work, the missile itself would be pretty "useless".[68]

"Some countries might buy them just to impress their neighbors, but their combat effectiveness would be negligible unless the country also invested in the needed detection, data processing, and communications systems".[68]- Roger Cliff

A December 16, 2016, press report states the following:[14]

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) said its new Sea Based Terminal (SBT) system achieved its second ballistic missile intercept during a Dec. 14 test over the Pacific Ocean. During the test, the USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)... fired a salvo of two Raytheon [RTN] Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) interceptors in immediate succession against a medium-range ballistic missile target launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii. The first interceptor was not armed and was designed to collect test data, MDA said. The second interceptor, which carried an explosive warhead, intercepted the Lockheed Martin-built target….

MDA called the target "complex" but declined to elaborate. However, according to the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, the target emulated China's Dong-Feng 21 (DF-21), a ballistic missile equipped with a maneuverable re-entry vehicle and designed to destroy U.S., aircraft carriers. The event, designated Flight Test Standard Missile-27 (FTM-27), was SBT's first salvo test and its second intercept in as many tries.[16]

In March 2020, Mike Griffin, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, revealed that SM-6 missile was being considered for hypersonic defense and that there are plans to test it against an actual hypersonic boost-glide vehicle in the 2023 Fiscal Year.[69]

An April 14, 2021 press report stated:[14]

The Missile Defense Agency, together with the U.S. Navy, plan to test an SM-6 missile against an "advanced maneuvering threat," a term that has been used in relation to unpowered hypersonic boost-glide vehicles, later this year. The Pentagon says that unspecified versions of the SM-6 have already demonstrated some degree of capability against these types of weapons, examples of which Russia and China have already begun putting to service. A new variant of the SM-6, the Block IB, is already under development and will itself be able to reach hypersonic speeds. Barbara McQuiston, a senior U.S. official currently performing the duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, including mention of the scheduled SM-6 test in her testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Defense yesterday….

Flight tests to date

edit

As of April 2024, Aegis BMDS has performed 45 successful intercepts in 54 attempts against ballistic missile targets.[70]

Name Date Result Description[71][72][73]
CTV-1 Sep 26, 1997 Failure The first flight test for the Navy Theater Wide program's Control Test Vehicle-1 (CTV-1) was on September 26, 1997, using a SM-2 Block IV missile modified for exo-atmospheric flight and launched fromUSSRussell.The missile self-destructed soon after launch after veering off course. The root cause of this problem was a defect in the Navy's existing SM-2 Block IV ordnance, not any guidance modifications for high-altitude flight. The Navy and BMDO thus characterized the flight as a "No-Test".
CTV-1A Sep 24, 1999 Success The next flight for Raytheon's SM-3 came on September 24, 1999, during Control Test Vehicle (CTV)-1A (Codename: Stellar Phoenix). CTV-1a was a test of the first and second stage of the SM-3. The mission was considered a success.USSShilohwas the launching ship.
FTR-1 Jul 8, 2000 Failure The next mission was conducted in July 2000 and designated Flight Test Round (FTR-1) (Codename: Stellar Archer). This mission ended in failure when the Third Stage Rocket Motor (TSRM) failed to separate from the second stage. USSShilohwas the launching ship.
FTR-1A Jan 25, 2001 Success FTR-1a (Codename: Stellar Gemini) was conducted on January 25, 2001. This mission would be the first time a live unitary target was engaged by the Aegis BMD system. The test target was launched from the U.S. Navy'sPacific Missile Range Facilitylocated on the Hawaiian island ofKauai.

FTR-1a would demonstrate exo-atmospheric avionics operation of the SM-3 Kinetic Warhead (KW) and the real-time performance of the Aegis BMD AN/SPY-1 radar. At the time this test was conducted, the KW's propulsion system, the Solid Divert and Attitude Control System (SDACS), was still being developed. Total system operation was demonstrated in FM-2. The mission was considered successful when the KW acquired and tracked the test target for several seconds.USSLake Eriewas the launching ship.

FM-2 Jan 25, 2002 Success The purpose of Flight Mission (FM)-2 (codename: Stellar Eagle) was to characterize the Aegis Weapon System and Standard Missile 3 interceptor. The mission was not required to intercept the target. On January 25, 2002, an SM-3 launched from USSLake Eriecollided with a test target northeast of the island of Kauai. This mission was the first interception of a ballistic missile from a sea-based platform.
FM-3 Jun 13, 2002 Success Aegis BMD succeeded in intercepting a unitary target missiles launched from PMRF during FM-3 (Codename: Stellar Impact). USSLake Eriewas the firing ship. This mission marked the successful completion of the Aegis LEAP Intercept program. June 13, 2002 was also the date that the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty), which limited the development of a strategic anti-ballistic missile system (to be considered strategic Aegis would need capability against the current Russian ICBMs and SLBMs).
FM-4 Nov 21, 2001 Success Aegis BMD intercepted a unitary ballistic missile during FM-4 (codename: Stellar Viper). FM-4 was the first Aegis BMD test to conduct the "aimpoint shift" maneuver. The aimpoint shift increases the probability that the ballistic missile ordnance will be destroyed at intercept. USSLake Eriewas the launching ship.
FM-5 Jun 18, 2003 Failure On June 18, 2003, the FM-5 mission (codename: Stellar Hammer) resulted in the first test failure of an operational Aegis BMD system. During the test, the SDACS propulsion system used to guide the SM-3's kinetic warhead suffered a malfunction after ignition. It is important to note that prior to the rocket motor failure the SM-3 kinetic warhead was on an intercept course with the test target. USSLake Eriewas the firing ship.
FM-6 Dec 11, 2003 Success The next mission, Codename: Stellar Defender, implemented a modification to the SDACS design so as not to endanger the warhead's ability to intercept. This override allowed the KW to navigate with reduced (but no less lethal) capability. FM-6 once again featured a successful interception. USSLake Eriewas the firing ship.
FTM-04-1 Feb 24, 2005 Success After the FM-6 mission, the Missile Defense Agency implemented a change to the flight test naming convention for all subsequent ABMD flight tests. According to MDA the new convention better reflected the program's position within the Block 2004/2006 schema of development. The new name, Flight Test Mission (FTM) 04-1 (codename: Stellar Dragon), indicated that this would be the first flight test under the Block 2004 development cycle for Aegis BMD. The flight test demonstrated yet again the system's ability to destroy an enemy ballistic missile. USSLake Eriewas the firing ship.
FTM-04-2 Nov 17, 2005 Success Codename Stellar Valkyrie, this was the first mission to utilize a target missile with a separating warhead. This new target missile, termed a Medium Range Target (MRT) more closely resembled real world threat missiles, but the SM-3 Block I missile was not fooled and intercepted the warhead to score the sixth interception for the program out of seven tries on November 17, 2005. USSLake Eriewas the firing ship.
FTM-10 Jun 23, 2006 Success The FTM-10 test target was the MRT with a separating warhead. USSShilohwas the launching ship and utilized the Aegis Weapon System version 3.6 for the first time. This test was the first to feature the latest model of the SM-3, the Block Ia. The mission was considered a success when the KW tracked, selected and intercepted the MRT reentry vehicle (RV).

FTM-10 marked the first time another country participated in a sea-based anti-ballistic missile exercise. The Japanese government was interested in purchasing a system similar to Aegis BMD to deter potential threats and was invited to participate in the FTM-10 exercise. The Japanese naval vesselJDSKirishima(aKongō-class destroyer) was stationed off the coast ofPMRFand observed all FTM-10 events.[74]

FTM-11 Dec 7, 2006 Failure The Aegis Weapon System failed to engage the test target and never launched the interceptor. The cause of the failure, an on-board error, was discovered and corrected prior to the retest of FTM-11 test flight. USSLake Eriewas the firing ship.[75]
FTM-11 Event 4 Apr 26, 2007 Success Aegis BMD successfully intercepted its eighth target in ten attempts. This test marked the 27th successful "Hit-to-Kill" intercept (for all MDA systems) since 2001. USSLake Eriewas the launching ship and utilized the Aegis 3.6 Weapon System. The interceptor was the SM-3 Block-Ia. This test not only demonstrated the ability of ABMD to intercept a ballistic missile but also demonstratedLake Erie's ability to simultaneously track and intercept antiship missiles. This test also utilized theSolid Divert and Attitude Control System (SDACS),in the full pulse configuration.[76]
FTM-11A Aug 31, 2007 Success Classified flight test.[77]
FTM-12 Jun 22, 2007 Success USSDecatur,using the operationally certified Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Weapon System (BMD 3.6) and the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA missile, successfully performed a "hit to kill" intercept of a separating, medium range, ballistic missile. The target missile was launched from thePacific Missile Range Facilityon Kauai, Hawaii. TheTiconderoga-classcruiserUSSPort Royal,Spain'sÁlvaro de Bazán-class frigateMéndez Núñez,and MDA'sTerminal High Altitude Area Defense(THAAD) mobile ground-based radar also participated in the flight test.FTM-12(Codename: Stellar Athena) was the first to use anArleigh Burke-class destroyeras the launching ship.[78]
FTM-13 Nov 6, 2007 Success USSLake Erielaunched two interceptors off the island of Kauai, Hawaii, engaging two short-range ballistic missile targets almost simultaneously.
FTM-14 Jun 6, 2008 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully intercepted a terminal phase target with a modified SM-2 Block IV interceptor. The aim of this mission was to test the interception and destruction of a short range ballistic missile target launched from a mobile launch platform.[79]
FTM-15 Apr 15, 2011 Success The Missile Defense Agency (MDA),USSO'Kane,and the 94th Army Air and Missile Defense Command operating from the 613th Air and Space Operations Center at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, successfully conducted a flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) element of the nation's Ballistic Missile Defense System, resulting in the intercept of a separating ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean. FTM-15, was the most challenging test to date, as it was the first Aegis BMD version 3.6.1 intercept against an intermediate-range target (range 1,864 to 3,418 miles) and the first Aegis BMD 3.6.1 engagement relying on remote tracking data. The ability to use remote radar data to engage a threat ballistic missile greatly increases the battle space and defended area of the SM-3 missile.[80]
FTM-16 Event 1 Mar 15, 2011 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully tracked a ballistic missile target. In addition to the BMD mission,Lake Eriealso validated the ship's anti-air warfare (AAW) capability by destroying an incoming anti-ship cruise missile target with an SM-2 Block III missile in a live firing exercise. This was the first event in which a ship used BMD 4.0.1 Weapon System to engage an AAW threat.[81]
FTM-16 Event 2 Sep 1, 2011 Failure A short-range ballistic missile target was launched from the U.S. Navy's Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii. Approximately 90 seconds later, a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block 1B interceptor missile was launched from USSLake Eriebut an intercept of the target was not achieved. The failure was due to a third-stage rocket motor pulse failure.[70][82]
FTM-16 Event 2A May 9, 2012 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted a flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the first intercept of a short-range ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by the Navy's newest Missile Defense interceptor, the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB.[83]
FTM-17 Jul 30, 2009 Success USSHopper,detected, tracked, fired and guided a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block (Blk) IA to intercept a sub-scale short range ballistic missile.[70][84]
FTM-18 Jun 27, 2012 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted a flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the intercept of a separating ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by the Navy's newest missile defense interceptor missile, the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB. The test event was the second consecutive successful intercept test of the SM-3 Block IB missile and the second-generation Aegis BMD 4.0.1 weapon system. The first successful SM-3 Block IB intercept occurred on May 9, 2012.[85][86]
FTM-19 May 16, 2013 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted a flight test today of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the intercept of a separating ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by the Aegis BMD 4.0 Weapon System and a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB missile. This test exercised the latest version of the second-generation Aegis BMD Weapon System and Standard Missile, providing capability for engagement of longer-range and more sophisticated ballistic missiles.[87]
FTM-20 Feb 13, 2013 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted a flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA guided missile. The in-orbit Space Tracking and Surveillance System-Demonstrators (STSS-D) detected and tracked the target, and forwarded track data to USSLake Erie.The ship, equipped with the second-generation Aegis BMD weapon system, used Launch on Remote doctrine to engage the target. This event, designated Flight Test Standard Missile 20 (FTM-20), was a demonstration of the ability of space-based assets to provide mid-course fire control quality data to an Aegis BMD ship, extending the battlespace, providing the ability for longer range intercepts and defense of larger areas.[88]
FTO-1 Sep 10, 2013 Success FTO-01 was conducted in the vicinity of the U.S. ArmyKwajalein AtollRonald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Siteand surrounding areas in the western Pacific. The test stressed the ability of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) weapon systems to function in a layered defense architecture and defeat a raid of two near-simultaneous ballistic missile targets. USSDecaturwith its Aegis Weapon System detected and tracked the first target with its onboard AN/SPY-1 radar. The Aegis BMD weapon system developed a fire control solution, launched a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA missile, and successfully intercepted the target.[89]

In a demonstration of BMDS layered defense capabilities, a second AN/TPY-2 radar in Terminal Mode, located with the THAAD weapon system, acquired and tracked the target missiles. THAAD developed a fire control solution, launched a THAAD interceptor missile, and successfully intercepted the second medium-range ballistic missile target. THAAD was operated by soldiers from the Alpha Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment. As a planned demonstration of THAAD's layered defense capabilities, a second THAAD interceptor was launched at the target destroyed by Aegis as a contingency in the event the SM-3 did not achieve an intercept.[89]

FTM-21 Sep 18, 2013 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted a flight test today of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the intercept of a complex separating short-range ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by the Aegis BMD 4.0 Weapon System and a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB guided missile. This was an operationally realistic test, in which the target's launch time and bearing are not known in advance, and the target complex was the most difficult target engaged to date.[90]
FTM-22 Oct 3, 2013 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully conducted an operational flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in the intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile target over the Pacific Ocean by the Aegis BMD 4.0 Weapon System and a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB guided missile. FTM-22 is the 28th successful intercept in 34 flight test attempts for the Aegis BMD program since flight testing began in 2002. Across all Ballistic Missile Defense System programs, this is the 64th successful hit-to-kill intercept in 80 flight test attempts since 2001.
FTM-31 E1a Mar 30, 2023 Success TheUSSDaniel Inouye(DDG 118) successfully executed Test FTM-31 E1a. The test highlights adjustments made after FTM-31 E1 (May 2021) which did not meet all its objectives; this test validates that the upgraded Standard Missile 6 (SM-6) Dual II SWUP capability is now ready for use by the warfighter.[91]
Stellar Daggers Mar 26, 2009 Success USSBenfoldsimultaneously engaged an SRBM in terminal phase and a cruise missile using SM-2s.[92]
JFTM-1 Dec 18, 2007 Success The JFTM-1 test event verified the new engagement capability of the Aegis BMD configuration of the recently upgraded Japanese destroyer,JSKongō.At approximately 12:05 pm (HST), 7:05 am Tokyo time on December 18, 2007, a ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii. JSKongōcrew members detected and tracked the target. The Aegis Weapon System then developed a fire control solution and at approximately 12:08 pm (HST), 7:08 am Tokyo time, a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA was launched. Approximately three minutes later, the SM-3 successfully intercepted the target approximately 100 miles above the Pacific Ocean.[93]
JFTM-2 Nov 19, 2008 Failure JFTM-2 was a test of the newest engagement capability of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense configuration of the recently upgraded Japanese destroyer,JSChōkai.At approximately 4:21 pm (HST), 11:21 am (Tokyo time) a ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii. JSChōkaicrew members detected and tracked the target using an advanced on-board radar. The Aegis Weapon System then developed a fire control solution, and at approximately 4:24 pm (HST), 11:24 am (Tokyo time) on Nov 20, a single Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA was launched. Approximately two minutes later, the SM-3 failed to intercept the target. The cause of the failure was an SM-3 Block IA interceptor divert and attitude control malfunction.[70][94]
JFTM-3 Nov 19, 2008 Success The JFTM-3 test event verified the newest engagement capability of the Japan Aegis BMD configuration of the recently upgraded Japanese destroyer,JSMyōkō.At approximately 6:00pm (HST), 1:00 pm Tokyo time on October 28, a separating, medium-range ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii. JSMyōkōcrew members detected and tracked the target. The Aegis Weapon System then developed a fire control solution and, at approximately 6:04pm (HST), 1:04 pm Tokyo time a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA interceptor missile was launched. Approximately three minutes later, the SM-3 successfully intercepted the target approximately 100 miles above the Pacific Ocean.[95]
JFTM-4 Oct 28, 2010 Success The JFTM-4 test event verified the newest engagement capability of the Japan Aegis BMD configuration of the recently upgraded Japanese destroyer, JSKrishima.At approximately 5:06 p.m. (HST), 12:06 p.m. Tokyo time on October 29, 2010, a separating 1,000 km class ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii.

JSKirishimacrew members detected and tracked the target. The Aegis Weapon System then developed a fire control solution and launched a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IA missile. Approximately three minutes later, the SM-3 successfully intercepted the target approximately 100 miles above the Pacific Ocean.[96]

FTI-01 Oct 25, 2012 Failure The live-fire demonstration, conducted at U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll/Reagan Test Site, Hickam AFB, and surrounding areas in the western Pacific, stressed the performance of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), THAAD, and PATRIOT (PAC-3) weapon systems.USSFitzgeraldsuccessfully engaged a low flying cruise missile over water. The Aegis system also tracked and launched an SM-3 Block 1A interceptor against a Short-Range Ballistic Missile. However, despite indication of a nominal flight of the SM-3 Block 1A interceptor, there was no indication of an intercept of the SRBM. The failure was attributed to an Inertial Measurement Unit failure.[70][97]
Pacific BlitZ Nov 1, 2008 Partial Pacific Blitz was the first U.S. Navy proficiency firing to employ theSM-3missile against a ballistic missile target. During the Fleet Exercise "Pacific Blitz", two Pearl Harbor-based Aegis BMD destroyers,USSPaul Hamiltonand USSHopperfired SM-3 missiles at separate targets. Upon detecting and tracking the target, USSPaul Hamiltonlaunched an SM-3 missile resulting in a direct hit. USSHoppersuccessfully detected, monitored and fired at the second target, but the interceptor missed. The cause of the failure was attributed to an infrared seeker failure.[70][98][99]
Pacific Phoenix May 6, 2006 Success USSLake Eriesuccessfully intercepted a Unitary short-range target.[70][77]
FTM-25 Nov 6, 2014 Success USSJohn Paul Jonessuccessfully conducted a flight test of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, resulting in three successful near-simultaneous target engagements over the Pacific Ocean. One short-range ballistic missile target was intercepted by a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Block IB guided missile, while two low-flying cruise missile targets were engaged by Standard Missile 2 (SM-2) Block IIIA guided missiles near-simultaneously.
MMW event 1 July 28, 2015 Success A short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) target was launched from PMRF in a northwesterly trajectory. USSJohn Paul Jones,positioned west of Hawaii, detected, tracked, and launched a SM-6 Dual I missile, resulting in a successful target intercept in the terminal stage.
MMW event 2 July 29, 2015 Success A short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) target was launched from PMRF in a northwesterly trajectory. USSJohn Paul Jones,positioned west of Hawaii, detected, tracked, and launched a SM-2 block 4 missile, resulting in a successful target intercept.
MTMD October 20, 2015 Success A Terrier-Orion short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) target was launched from the UK's Hebrides Range, northwest of Scotland. With multinational vessels in the North Atlantic participating in Maritime Theater Missile Defense,USSRosslaunched a SM-3 Block IA missile, resulting in a successful target intercept.
FTO-02 event 2a October 31, 2015 Failure The test stressed the ability of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) weapon systems to negate two ballistic missile threats while Aegis BMD simultaneously conducted an anti-air warfare operation. A Short Range Air Launch Target (SRALT) was launched by a U.S. Air Force C-17. THAAD successfully intercepted the SRALT target. While THAAD was engaging the SRALT, an extended Medium Range Ballistic Missile (eMRBM) was air-launched by another Air Force C-17. The eMRBM target was detected and tracked by multiple BMDS assets including the AN/TPY-2 in forward-based mode, and USSJohn Paul Joneswith its AN/SPY-1 radar. Shortly after eMRBM launch, a BQM-74E air-breathing target was also launched and tracked by USSJohn Paul Jones.Both Aegis BMD and THAAD launched interceptors to engage the eMRBM. USSJohn Paul Jonessuccessfully launched a Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IB Threat Upgrade guided missile, but an anomaly early in its flight prevented a midcourse intercept. However, the THAAD interceptor, in its terminal defense role, acquired and successfully intercepted the target. Concurrently, Aegis BMD successfully engaged the BQM-74E air-breathing target with a Standard Missile-2 Block IIIA guided missile. A failure review is currently underway to investigate the SM-3 anomaly.
FTO-02 event 1a December 9, 2015 Success During the test, a target representing a medium-range ballistic missile was air-launched from a U.S. Air Force C-17 aircraft over the broad ocean area southwest of Hawaii. The Aegis Ashore Weapon System then launched the SM-3 Block IB Threat Upgrade guided missile from its Vertical Launch System. The SM-3's kinetic warhead acquired the target reentry vehicle, diverted into its path, and destroyed the target using the kinetic force of a direct impact.
FTM-27 December 14, 2016 Success USSJohn Paul Jones,an Aegis baseline 9.C1 equipped destroyer, successfully fired a salvo of two SM-6 Dual I missiles against a complex medium-range ballistic missile target, demonstrating the Sea Based Terminal endo-atmospheric defensive capability.[100]
SFTM-01 February 3, 2017 Success The test from USSJohn Paul Joneswas the first launch of an SM-3 Block IIA missile from an Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) ship, and the first intercept engagement using the Aegis Baseline 9.C2 (BMD 5.1) weapon system. SFTM-01 was the third flight test of the SM-3 Block IIA missile, but the first intercept attempt.[101]
SFTM-02 June 21, 2017 Failure A medium-range ballistic target missile was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Kauai, Hawaii. The USSJohn Paul Jones(DDG-53) detected and tracked the target missile with its onboard AN/SPY-1 radar using the Aegis Baseline 9.C2 weapon system. Upon acquiring and tracking the target, the ship launched an SM-3 Block IIA guided missile, but the missile did not intercept the target.[102]The attempt was unsuccessful because a sailor on board the firing ship inadvertently designated the target as friendly, causing the Aegis Weapon System to break the engagement and initiate a message commanding the SM-3 Block IIA missile to destruct, destroying the missile in flight[16]
FTM-27 E2 August 29, 2017 Success The USSJohn Paul Jones(DDG-53) successfully conducted a complex missile defense flight test, resulting in the intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) target using Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) guided missiles during a test off the coast of Hawaii.[103]
FS-17 E4 October 15, 2017 Success The guided-missile destroyer USSDonald Cook(DDG-75) successfully detected, tracked and intercepted a medium-range ballistic missile target with a Standard Missile-3 Block IB guided missile.[104]
FTM-29 January 31, 2018 Failure The Missile Defense Agency and U.S. Navy sailors manning the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex (AAMDTC) conducted a live-fire missile flight test Jan. 31 using a Standard-Missile (SM)-3 Block IIA missile launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii. This was a developmental and operational test of a new capability and utilized a missile variant not yet in production. The primary objective of the test, to intercept an air-launched intermediate-range ballistic missile target with an SM-3 Block IIA missile, was not achieved.[105]
JFTM-5 Event 2 September 11, 2018 Success The test event verified the newest BMD engagement capability of the Japan (J6) Aegis BMD configuration of the recently upgraded Japan destroyer, JS ATAGO (DDG-177). At approximately 10:37pm HST on September 11, 2018, a simple separating, ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii. JS ATAGO crew members detected and tracked the target. The Aegis Weapon System then developed a fire control solution and a Standard Missile -3 Block IB Threat Upgrade (SM-3 Blk IB TU) missile was launched. The SM-3 successfully intercepted the target above the Pacific Ocean.[106]
FTM-45 October 26, 2018 Success TheUSSJohn Finn(DDG-113)successfully conducted an intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile target with a Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA missile during a flight test off the west coast of Hawaii.[107]
FTI-03 December 10, 2018 Success The Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex (AAMDTC) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) at Kauai, Hawaii, successfully conducted Flight Test Integrated-03 (FTI-03). This was an operational live fire test demonstrating the Aegis Weapon System Engage On Remote capability to track and intercept an Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) target with an Aegis Ashore-launched Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA interceptor.[108]
FTM-44 November 17, 2020 Success At approximately 7:50 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time, (12:50 a.m., Nov. 17, Eastern Standard Time), the ICBM-representative target was launched from the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site, located on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, toward the broad ocean area northeast of Hawaii. In this developmental test, the USS John Finn (DDG-113) used engage-on-remote capabilities through the Command and Control Battle Management Communications (C2BMC) network as part of a defense of Hawaii scenario. After receiving tracking data from the C2BMC system, the destroyer launched a SM-3 Block IIA guided missile which destroyed the target.[109]
FTM-48 October 25, 2023 Success Codename: Vigilant Wyvern.USSCarl M. Levinsuccessfully conducted an interception of two Terrier Oriole medium-range ballistic missile targets with two SM-3 Block IA missiles and of two BQM-117A subsonic anti-ship cruise missile drone targets with four SM-2 Block IIIA missiles. The targets were launched from Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii.[110]
FTX-23 February 8, 2024 Success Codename: Stellar Sisyphus. The first part of the test was planned as a tracking event of a complex target with the primary objective of collecting data on the target scene from multiple sensors across different viewing angles. It involvedUSSMcCampbellandUSSJack H. Lucas,together with the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex and the Advanced Radar Development Evaluation Laboratory, tracking a Medium Range Ballistic Missile with countermeasures released by a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III plane flying over the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii. The second part of the test consisted in the successful interception of the target with a SM-3 Block IIA missile launched by USSMcCampbell.[111]
FTM-32 March 28, 2024 Success Codename: Stellar Laelaps. The test demonstrated the capability to detect, track, engage, and intercept an MRBM target in the terminal phase of flight. A Medium Range Ballistic Missile launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii was intercepted through twoSM-6 Dual IImissiles launched byUSSPreble.Support was provided also byUSSJack H. Lucas,as well as by the Australian Defence Force throughHMASStuartand aBoeing E-7 Wedgetailaircraft.[112]
edit
  • FM-6 Mission Logo
  • FM-8 Mission Logo
  • SM-3 interceptor launch during FTM-21
  • Launch of SM-3 interceptor during FTM-18
  • FTM-14 Mission Logo
  • SM-3 Block IIA launch from the Aegis Ashore in Hawaii

See also

edit

Notes

edit

References

edit
  1. ^Navy Tactical Reference Publication 1-02, Navy Supplement To The DOD Dictionary Of Military And Associated Terms, April 2011. Page 3-4.ArchivedNovember 29, 2022, at theWayback Machine.Accessed on 04 April 2013
  2. ^"Fact Sheet on U.S. Missile Defense Policy - A" Phased, Adaptive Approach "for Missile Defense in Europe".Office of the Press Secretary.The White House. September 17, 2009.RetrievedAugust 23,2012.
  3. ^abc"Aegis Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) System".RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  4. ^Aegis BMD web pageArchived2014-01-25 at theWayback Machine,U.S. Missile Defense Agencyofficial website.
  5. ^Sea-Based Ballistic Missile Defense - Background and Issues for CongressArchivedAugust 11, 2014, at theWayback Machine
  6. ^RIM-161 SM-3 (AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense),spacewar.
  7. ^NY Times article,9/18/09.
  8. ^Russia's Putin praises Obama's missile defense decision,LA Times, 9/19/09.
  9. ^No missile defense in Eastern EuropeArchivedNovember 3, 2013, at theWayback Machine,foreignpolicy, 9/17/09.
  10. ^Obama sharply alters missile defense plansBy William H. McMichael, Sep 19, 2009, navytimes.
  11. ^Article on Sm-3 missile system,strategypage, 10/4/09.
  12. ^"Lockheed Martin Successfully Completes Formal Testing of Second-Generation Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Capability | Lockheed Martin".October 20, 2011. Archived fromthe originalon October 20, 2011.RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  13. ^"Force Multiplier Capability Of Aegis Demonstrated."Space Daily,15 December 2010.
  14. ^abcde"Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress (RL33745)".Congressional Research Service. April 1, 2022.Archivedfrom the original on April 1, 2022.RetrievedMay 8,2022.Alt URL
  15. ^Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr.,"Non-Standard: Navy SM-6 Kills Cruise Missiles Deep Inland"– Breakingdefense, 19 August 2014
  16. ^abcd"Report to Congress on Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense".December 18, 2018.
  17. ^"SM-3 Block IIA Missile Excels in First Ever ICBM Intercept Test"(PDF).November 17, 2020.
  18. ^"Raytheon moves to preliminary design for Glide Phase Interceptor for hypersonic defense".September 21, 2022.
  19. ^"US MDA awards contracts to continue developing Glide Phase Interceptor".June 27, 2022.
  20. ^"PAC-3 MSE Integrated with Aegis Weapon System Defeats Target in Flight Test"(Press release). Lockheed Martin.RetrievedAugust 27,2024.
  21. ^See paragraph 57 of the Wales Summit Declaration.
  22. ^LaGrone, Sam (May 12, 2016)."Aegis Ashore Site in Romania Declared Operational".USNI News.United States Naval Institute.RetrievedDecember 14,2017.
  23. ^ab"NATO missile defence base in Poland now mission ready".NATO.July 10, 2024.RetrievedJuly 10,2024.
  24. ^Administration eyes land-based SPY,by Philip Ewing, Oct 24, 2010.[dead link‍]
  25. ^Turkey to Host U.S. Missile Defense,PR Newswire, Oct. 18, 2010.[dead link‍]
  26. ^Aegis Ashore web pageArchived2016-01-31 at theWayback Machine,U.S. Missile Defense Agencyofficial website.
  27. ^International Cooperation web pageArchived2016-02-01 at theWayback Machine,U.S. Missile Defense Agencyofficial website.
  28. ^"Inside Aegis Ashore".News Blog.United States Naval Institute.August 8, 2013.RetrievedSeptember 3,2013.
  29. ^Japan to buy Aegis Ashore missile defense systems,Mari Yamaguchi,The Associated Press/DefenseNews, 2017-12-20
  30. ^"Japan to expedite study on adopting land-based Aegis system".The Japan Times Online.April 29, 2017.RetrievedJanuary 15,2018.
  31. ^"U.S. Government Designates Lockheed Martin's Latest Generation Radar: AN/SPY-7(V)1 - Nov 14, 2019".Media - Lockheed Martin.RetrievedDecember 24,2019.
  32. ^"Marie Yamaguchi, AP (Aug 31, 2018) Japan would boost missile defenses in record military budget".ABC News.Archived fromthe originalon August 31, 2018.RetrievedAugust 31,2018.
  33. ^"Japan's defence chief seeks local support to deploy a land-based missile shield".The South China Morning Post.Associated Press. June 23, 2018.
  34. ^"Kono suspends deployment of Aegis Ashore defense system".The Asahi Shimbun.RetrievedJune 16,2020.
  35. ^Yamaguchi, Mari (June 25, 2020)."Japan confirms it's scrapping US missile defense system".DefenseNews.Gannett. Associated Press.RetrievedJune 26,2020.
  36. ^"ミサイル phòng vệ trang bị の dương thượng trang bị “Hợp lý でない” mễ sườn が chỉ trích | イージス・アショア | Nhkニュース ".www3.nhk.or.jp.Archived fromthe originalon September 23, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 12,2022.
  37. ^Paul McLeary (July 23, 2020)."INDOPACOM Wants Billions To Build, As Pentagon Plans Cuts To Overseas Presence".Breaking Defense.RetrievedMarch 7,2021.
  38. ^Mallory Shelbourne (March 4, 2021)."Davidson: Aegis Ashore on Guam Would 'Free Up' 3 Navy Destroyers".USNI News.RetrievedMarch 7,2021.
  39. ^"MDA - Aegis BMD".Missile Defense Agency. November 4, 2017.RetrievedNovember 4,2017.
  40. ^"The Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System in Naval Support Facility Redizkowo, Poland, Trans".U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa / U.S. Sixth Fleet.RetrievedMarch 29,2024.
  41. ^"MDA - Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense".mda.mil.RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  42. ^"Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress"(PDF).RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  43. ^Swaine, Michael D.;Swanger, Rachel M.; Kawakami, Takashi (2001)."Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense. RAND Report".
  44. ^Shabalin, Maxim (2011).The Logic of BMD Procurement in Japan (1994-2007)(Thesis). Oxford University, UK.
  45. ^"North Korea Rocket Flew Over Japan, Government Says (Update1) - Bloomberg".Bloomberg News.October 26, 2012. Archived from the original on October 26, 2012.RetrievedMay 26,2023.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  46. ^"Asia Times Online:: Korea News and Korean Business and Economy, Pyongyang News".March 5, 2009. Archived fromthe originalon March 5, 2009.RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  47. ^Let'S Shoot Something Down!
  48. ^"AFP: NKorea parliament to meet a day after rocket test".
  49. ^"Japan to ready defense against N.Korea rocket: Kyodo".Reuters.March 18, 2009.RetrievedMarch 23,2023– via reuters.
  50. ^"News".Archived fromthe originalon March 26, 2009.RetrievedMarch 24,2009.>
  51. ^"Allied Warships on Alert Over N. Korean Rocket Launch".koreatimes.March 26, 2009. Archived fromthe originalon March 23, 2023.RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  52. ^Union of Concerned Scientists: Unha-2 analysis, March 18, 2009
  53. ^Lia Wong (September 1, 2022)."Japanese Defense Budget Expansion Includes Two 20,000 Ton Cruisers".Overt Defense.RetrievedSeptember 7,2022.
  54. ^Dzirhan Mahadzir (September 6, 2022)."Japan to Build Two 20,000-ton Missile Defense Warships, Indian Carrier Commissions".USNI News Blog.RetrievedSeptember 7,2022.
  55. ^Yoshihiro Inaba (September 1, 2022)."Japan's New" Aegis Equipped Ships ": What We Know So Far".NavalNews.RetrievedSeptember 7,2022.
  56. ^abLaGrone, Sam (October 6, 2022)."UPDATED: Warships from U.S., Japan, South Korea Ballistic Missile Defense Drills After North Korean Missile Shots".News Blog.United States Naval Institute.RetrievedOctober 11,2022.
  57. ^"US Navy, JMSDF And ROK Navy Conduct BMD Exercise".NavalNews.October 6, 2022.RetrievedOctober 25,2022.
  58. ^Mahadzir, Dzirhan (November 21, 2022)."Two Japanese Destroyers Score in Ballistic Missile Defense Test off Hawaii".News Blog.United States Naval Institute.RetrievedNovember 22,2022.
  59. ^LaGrone, Sam (December 27, 2022)."Japanese MoD Releases New Details on Ballistic Missile Defense Ships".News Blog.United States Naval Institute.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  60. ^"Japanese MoD Releases Further Details About Its Future BMD Destroyers".Naval News.December 25, 2022.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  61. ^Emma, Helfrich (December 29, 2022)."First Rendering Of Japan's Ballistic Missile Defense Ship Concept Released".The Drive.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  62. ^"Defense Programs and Budget of Japan FY Reiwa 5 (2023) Budget Overview"(PDF).Budget overview.Japanese Ministry of Defense.December 23, 2022. p. 15.RetrievedJanuary 9,2023.Japanese
  63. ^Daniel Terdiman,"Inside the Navy's next-generation destroyer",CNET, August 4, 2010
  64. ^New missile defences in Europe:Shooting down a plan,Economist,Sept 24th 2009.ArchivedSeptember 28, 2009, at theWayback Machine
  65. ^Study says Aegis radar systems on the decline,By Philip Ewing,Navy Times,Wednesday Jul 7, 2010.
  66. ^O'Rourke, Ronald."CRS RL32109 - Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress."Congressional Research Service, 18 October 2012.
  67. ^"Russia will 'React Sharply' to US Aegis Ships – Deputy PM."Ria Novosti,12 November 2012.
  68. ^ab"Behind the China Missile Hype".The Diplomat.January 20, 2012.RetrievedJuly 29,2012.
  69. ^Joseph Trevithick.Navy SM-6 Missile Will Attempt To Swat Down A Mock Hypersonic Weapon.The Drive. April 14, 2021
  70. ^abcdefg"Test record"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 27, 2017.RetrievedJanuary 5,2017.
  71. ^"Missile Defense Integrated Test Flights"(PDF).Center for Defense Information. June 18, 2007. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on April 14, 2012.
  72. ^"Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)"(PDF).U.S. Office of the Director, Operational Test & Evaluation. 2012. p. 288. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on March 4, 2016.RetrievedJuly 7,2013.
  73. ^"Ballistic Missile Defense Intercept Flight Test Record"(PDF).Missile Defense Agency. July 8, 2013. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 11, 2013.RetrievedJuly 8,2013.
  74. ^"Missile passes another test | The Honolulu Advertiser | Hawaii's Newspaper".the.honoluluadvertiser.RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  75. ^Chris Taylor, (December 7, 2006), "For Your Information", Missile Defense AgencyArchivedFebruary 7, 2007, at theWayback Machine
  76. ^Chris Taylor (April 26, 2007). "Successful Sea-Based Missile Defense 'Hit-to-Kill' Intercept".Missile Defense Agency.ArchivedJuly 14, 2009, at theWayback Machine
  77. ^abAegis Ballistic Missile Defense TestingArchived2014-07-28 at theWayback Machine
  78. ^Chris Taylor (June 22, 2007). "Sea-Based Missile Defense 'Hit-to-Kill' Intercept Achieved". 'Missile Defense Agency News Release'.ArchivedJuly 11, 2007, at theWayback Machine
  79. ^"Successful Sea-Based Missile Defense Intercept".RetrievedMarch 23,2023.
  80. ^Sea-based Missile Defense Flight Test Results in Successful InterceptArchived2012-03-30 at theWayback Machine
  81. ^Aegis Future CapabilitiesArchived2014-10-01 at theWayback Machine
  82. ^Sea-Based Missile Defense Test ConductedArchived2014-08-04 at theWayback Machine
  83. ^Second-Generation Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Completes Successful Intercept Flight TestArchived2014-10-17 at theWayback Machine
  84. ^Second-Generation Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Completes Second Successful Intercept Flight TestArchived2014-10-17 at theWayback Machine
  85. ^Second-Generation Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Completes Second Successful Intercept Flight TestArchived2013-02-20 at theWayback Machine
  86. ^Lockheed Martin's Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Successfully Intercepts Second Target This Year
  87. ^Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Completes Successful Intercept Flight TestArchived2014-07-28 at theWayback Machine
  88. ^Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Intercepts Target Using Space Tracking and Surveillance System-Demonstrators (STSS-D) DataArchived2014-10-17 at theWayback Machine
  89. ^ab"Ballistic Missile Defense System Demonstrates Layered Defense While Conducting Multiple Engagements in Operational Test".US Department of Defense. November 1, 2015.RetrievedSeptember 16,2016.This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  90. ^Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System Completes Successful Intercept Flight TestArchived2014-08-15 at theWayback Machine
  91. ^Mark Wright, Missile Defense Agency Public Affairs(31 Mar 2023) MDA Test Successfully Intercepts Ballistic Missile Target
  92. ^"Navy Completes Air and Ballistic Missile Exercise".news.navy.mil.Archived fromthe originalon April 10, 2009.
  93. ^Japan/U.S. Missile Defense Flight Test SuccessfulArchived2016-03-03 at theWayback Machine
  94. ^Japan/U.S. Missile Defense Flight Test CompletedArchived2016-03-04 at theWayback Machine
  95. ^Japan/U.S. Missile Defense Flight Test SuccessfulArchived2014-10-17 at theWayback Machine
  96. ^Joint Japan-U.S. Missile Defense Flight Test SuccessfulArchived2014-10-17 at theWayback Machine
  97. ^Ballistic Missile Defense System Engages Five Targets Simultaneously During Largest Missile Defense Flight Test in HistoryArchived2013-02-16 at theWayback Machine
  98. ^Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense WarfighterArchived2012-10-22 at theWayback Machine
  99. ^U.S. Navy Missile Defense Test Shoots One-For-Two
  100. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. December 14, 2016.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  101. ^"Janes | Latest defence and security news".
  102. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. June 21, 2017.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  103. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. August 29, 2017.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  104. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  105. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. January 31, 2018.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  106. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  107. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. October 26, 2018.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  108. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. December 11, 2018.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  109. ^"MDA - MDA News Releases"(Press release). Mda.mil. November 16, 2020.RetrievedAugust 28,2022.
  110. ^"US Navy and MDA Successfully Intercept Multiple Targets In Integrated Air and Missile Defense Test".Missile Defense Agency.October 25, 2023.RetrievedOctober 31,2023.
  111. ^"Missile Defense Agency and U.S. Navy Successfully Demonstrate Aegis Weapon System Capabilities against Advanced Countermeasure Missile Target".Missile Defense Agency.February 8, 2024.RetrievedFebruary 11,2024.
  112. ^"MDA, Navy Conducts Successful Intercept with SM-6; Advances collaboration with Australia".Missile Defense Agency.March 28, 2024.RetrievedMarch 31,2024.
edit
Wikimedia Commons has media related toAegis Ballistic Missile Defense System.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aegis_Ballistic_Missile_Defense_System&oldid=1262295673#Aegis_Ashore"