Wikipedia

Alboin

For other uses, seeAlboin (disambiguation).
Not to be confused withAlbion.

Alboin(530s – 28 June 572) was king of theLombardsfrom about 560 until 572. During his reign the Lombards ended theirmigrationsby settling in Italy, the northern part of which Alboin conquered between 569 and 572. He had a lasting effect on Italy and thePannonian Basin;in the former, his invasion marked the beginning of centuries of Lombard rule, and in the latter, his defeat of theGepidsand his departure fromPannoniaended the dominance there of theGermanic peoples.

Alboin
King of the Lombards
Woodcut vignette of Alboin in the 1493Nuremberg Chronicle
Reign560/565 – 572
PredecessorAudoin
SuccessorCleph
Born530s
Pannonia
Died28 June 572
Verona,Kingdom of the Lombards
Burial
Verona, Italy
SpouseChlothsind
Rosamund
IssueAlbsuinda
HouseGausi
FatherAudoin
MotherRodelinda
ReligionArianism

The period of Alboin's reign as king in Pannonia following the death of his father,Audoin,was one of confrontation and conflict between the Lombards and their main neighbours, the Gepids. The Gepids initially gained the upper hand, but in 567, thanks to his alliance with theAvars,Alboin inflicted a decisive defeat on his enemies, whose lands the Avars subsequently occupied. The increasing power of his new neighbours caused Alboin some unease however, and he therefore decided to leave Pannonia for Italy, hoping to take advantage of theByzantine Empire's vulnerability in defending its territory in the wake of theGothic War.

After gathering a large coalition of peoples, Alboin crossed theJulian Alpsin 568, entering an almost undefended Italy. He rapidly took control of most ofVenetiaandLiguria.In 569, unopposed, he took northern Italy's main city,Milan.Paviaoffered stiff resistance, however, and was taken only after a siege lasting three years. During that time Alboin turned his attention toTuscany,but signs of factionalism among his supporters and Alboin's diminishing control over his army increasingly began to manifest themselves.

Alboin was assassinated on 28 June 572, in acoup d'étatinstigated by the Byzantines. It was organized by the king's foster brother,Helmichis,with the support of Alboin's wife,Rosamund,daughter of the Gepid king whom Alboin had killed some years earlier. The coup failed in the face of opposition from a majority of the Lombards, who electedClephas Alboin's successor, forcing Helmichis and Rosamund to flee toRavennaunder imperial protection. Alboin's death deprived the Lombards of the only leader who could have kept the newborn Germanic entity together, the last in the line of hero-kings who had led the Lombards through their migrations from the vale of theElbeto Italy. For many centuries following his death Alboin's heroism and his success in battle were celebrated in Saxon and Bavarian epic poetry.

Etymology

edit

The name Alboin derives from theProto-Germanicroots*albiz( "elf") and*winiz( "friend" ); it is thus cognate with theOld EnglishnameÆlfwine.[1]He was known inLatinasAlboinusand inGreekas Ἀλβοΐνος (Alboinos). In modern Italian he isAlboinoand in modernLombardAlboin.[2]

Father's rule

edit

The Lombards under KingWachohad migrated towards the east into Pannonia, taking advantage of the difficulties facing theOstrogothic Kingdomin Italy following the death of its founder,Theodoric,in 526. Wacho's death in about 540 brought his sonWaltharito the throne, but, as the latter was still a minor, the kingdom was governed in his stead by Alboin's father, Audoin, of theGausianclan. Seven years later Walthari died, giving Audoin the opportunity to crown himself and overthrow the reigningLethings.[3]

Alboin was probably born in the 530s inPannonia,[4]the son of Audoin and his wife,Rodelinda.She may have been the niece of King Theodoric and betrothed to Audoin through the mediation of EmperorJustinian.[5][6]Like his father, Alboin was raised a pagan, although Audoin had at one point attempted to gain Byzantine support against his neighbours by professing himself a Christian.[7]Alboin took as his first wife the ChristianChlothsind,daughter of theFrankishKingChlothar.This marriage, which took place soon after the death of the Frankish rulerTheudebaldin 555, is thought to reflect Audoin's decision to distance himself from the Byzantines, traditional allies of the Lombards, who had been lukewarm when it came to supporting Audoin against the Gepids. The new Frankish alliance was important because of the Franks' known hostility to the Byzantine empire, providing the Lombards with more than one option.[8][9]However, theProsopography of the Later Roman Empireinterprets events and sources differently, believing that Alboin married Chlothsind when already a king in or shortly before 561, the year of Chlothar's death.[4]

Alboin first distinguished himself on the battlefield in a clash with the Gepids. At theBattle of Asfeld(552), he killedTurismod,son of the Gepid kingThurisind,in a victory that resulted in Emperor Justinian's intervention to maintain equilibrium between the rival regional powers.[10]After the battle, according to a tradition reported byPaul the Deacon,to be granted the right to sit at his father's table, Alboin had to ask for the hospitality of a foreign king and have him donate his weapons, as was customary. For this initiation, he went to the court of Thurisind, where the Gepid king gave him Turismod's arms.[4][11]Walter Goffartbelieves it is probable that in this narrative Paul was making use of an oral tradition, and is sceptical that it can be dismissed as merely a typicaltoposof anepic poem.[12]

Reign in Pannonia

edit

Alboin came to the throne after the death of his father, sometime between 560 and 565.[9]As was customary among the Lombards, Alboin took the crown after an election by the tribe's freemen, who traditionally selected the king from the dead sovereign's clan.[13][14]Shortly, in 565, a new war erupted with the Gepids, now led byCunimund,Thurisind's son. The cause of the conflict is uncertain, as the sources are divided; the Lombard Paul the Deacon accuses the Gepids, while the Byzantine historianMenander Protectorplaces the blame on Alboin, an interpretation favoured by historianWalter Pohl.[15]

An account of the war by the ByzantineTheophylact Simocattasentimentalises the reasons behind the conflict, claiming it originated with Alboin's vain courting and subsequent kidnapping of Cunimund's daughterRosamund,that Alboin proceeded then to marry. The tale is treated with scepticism by Walter Goffart, who observes that it conflicts with theOrigo Gentis Langobardorum,where she was captured only after the death of her father.[16][17]The Gepids obtained the support of the Emperor in exchange for a promise to cede him the region ofSirmium,the seat of the Gepid kings. Thus in 565 or 566 Justinian's successorJustin IIsent his son-in-lawBaduariusasmagister militum(field commander) to lead a Byzantine army against Alboin in support of Cunimund, ending in the Lombards' complete defeat.[9][15][18][19][20]

Faced with the possibility of annihilation, Alboin made an alliance in 566 with theAvarsunderBayan I,at the expense of some tough conditions: the Avars demanded a tenth of the Lombards' cattle, half of the war booty, and on the war's conclusion all of the lands held by the Gepids. The Lombards played on the pre-existing hostility between the Avars and the Byzantines, claiming that the latter were allied with the Gepids. Cunimund, on the other hand, encountered hostility when he once again asked the Emperor for military assistance, as the Byzantines had been angered by the Gepids' failure to cede Sirmium to them, as had been agreed. Moreover, Justin II was moving away from the foreign policy of Justinian, and believed in dealing more strictly with bordering states and peoples. Attempts to mollify Justin II with tributes failed, and as a result the Byzantines kept themselves neutral if not outright supportive of the Avars.[9][21]

In 567 the allies made their final move against Cunimund, with Alboin invading the Gepids' lands from the northwest while Bayan attacked from the northeast. Cunimund attempted to prevent the two armies from joining up by moving against the Lombards and clashing with Alboin somewhere between theTibiscusandDanuberivers. The Gepids were defeated in the ensuing battle, their king slain by Alboin, and Cunimund's daughter Rosamund taken captive, according to references in theOrigo.The full destruction of the Gepid kingdom was completed by the Avars, who overcame the Gepids in the east. As a result, the Gepids ceased to exist as an independent people and were partly absorbed by the Lombards and the Avars.[9][19][22]Sometime before 568, Alboin's first wife Chlothsind died, and after his victory against Cunimund Alboin married Rosamund, to establish a bond with the remaining Gepids.[23]The war also marked a watershed in the geo-political history of the region, as together with the Lombard migration the following year, it signalled the end of six centuries of Germanic dominance in the Pannonian Basin.[24]

Preparations and departure from Pannonia

edit

Despite his success against the Gepids, Alboin had failed to greatly increase his power, and was now faced with a much stronger threat from the Avars.[25]Historians consider this the decisive factor in convincing Alboin to undertake a migration, even though there are indications that before the war with the Gepids a decision was maturing to leave for Italy, a country thousands of Lombards had seen in the 550s when hired by the Byzantines to fight in the Gothic War.[9][26]Additionally, the Lombards would have known of the weakness of Byzantine Italy, which had endured a number of problems after being retaken from the Goths. In particular the so-calledPlague of Justinianhad ravaged the region and conflict remained endemic, with theThree-Chapter Controversysparking religious opposition and administration at a standstill after the able governor of the peninsula,Narses,was recalled.[27]Nevertheless, the Lombards viewed Italy as a rich land which promised great booty,[25][28]assets Alboin used to gather together a horde which included not only Lombards but many other peoples of the region, includingHeruli,Suebi,Gepids,Thuringii,Bulgars,Sarmatians,the remaining Romans and a few Ostrogoths. But the most important group, other than the Lombards, were theSaxons,of whom 20,000 male warriors with their families participated in the trek. These Saxons were tributaries to the Frankish KingSigebert,and their participation indicates that Alboin had the support of the Franks for his venture.[9][29]

The precise size of the heterogeneous group gathered by Alboin is impossible to know, and many different estimates have been made.Neil Christieconsiders 150,000 to be a realistic size, a number which would make the Lombards a more numerous force than the Ostrogoths on the eve of their invasion of Italy. Jörg Jarnut proposes 100,000–150,000 as an approximation; Wilfried Menghen inDie Langobardenestimates 150,000 to 200,000; while Stefano Gasparri cautiously judges the peoples united by Alboin to be somewhere between 100,000 and 300,000.[28][29][30][31]

The Vipava Valley in Slovenia, through which Alboin led the Lombards into Italy

As a precautionary move Alboin strengthened his alliance with the Avars, signing what Paul calls afoedus perpetuum( "perpetual treaty" ) and what is referred to in the 9th-centuryHistoria Langobardorum codicis Gothanias apactum et foedus amicitiae( "pact and treaty of friendship" ), adding that the treaty was put down on paper. By the conditions accepted in the treaty, the Avars were to take possession of Pannonia and the Lombards were promised military support in Italy should the need arise; also, for a period of 200 years, the Lombards were to maintain the right to reclaim their former territories if the plan to conquer Italy failed, thus leaving Alboin with an alternative open. The accord also had the advantage of protecting Alboin's rear, as an Avar-occupied Pannonia would make it difficult for the Byzantines to bring forces to Italy by land. The agreement proved immensely successful, and relations with the Avars were almost uninterruptedly friendly during the lifetime of the Lombard Kingdom.[32][33][34]

A further cause of the Lombard migration into Italy may have been an invitation from Narses. According to a controversial tradition reported by several medieval sources, Narses, out of spite for having been removed by Justinian's successor Justin II, called the Lombards to Italy. Often dismissed as an unreliable tradition,[31][35]it has been studied with attention by modern scholars, in particular Neil Christie, who see in it a possible record of a formal invitation by the Byzantine state to settle in northern Italy asfoederati,to help protect the region against the Franks, an arrangement that may have been disowned by Justin II after Narses' removal.[26][36][37][38]

March to Italy

edit
"This Albuin led into Italy the Langobards who were invited by Narses (chief) of the secretaries. And Albuin, king of the Langobards, moved out of Pannonia in the month of April after Easter in the first indiction. In the second indiction, indeed, they began to plunder in Italy, but in the third indiction he became master of Italy."[39]
The Origin of the Nation of the Langobards,Chapter V

The Lombard migration started on Easter Monday, 2 April 568. The decision to combine the departure with a Christian celebration can be understood in the context of Alboin's recent conversion toArian Christianity,as attested by the presence of Arian Gothic missionaries at his court.[26][40]The conversion is likely to have been motivated mostly by political considerations, and intended to consolidate the migration's cohesion, distinguishing the migrants from the Catholic Romans. It also connected Alboin and his people to the Gothic heritage, and in this way obtained the support of the Ostrogoths serving in the Byzantine army asfoederati.[9][41]It has been speculated that Alboin's migration could have been partly the result of a call from surviving Ostrogoths in Italy.[26]

The season chosen for leaving Pannonia was unusually early; the Germanic peoples generally waited until autumn before beginning the migration, giving themselves time to do the harvesting and replenish their granaries for the march. The reason behind the spring departure could be the anxiety induced by the neighbouring Avars, despite the friendship treaty. Nomadic peoples like the Avars also waited for autumn to begin their military campaigns, as they needed enough forage for their horses. A sign of this anxiety can also be seen in the decision taken by Alboin to ravage Pannonia, which created a safety zone between the Lombards and the Avars.[33][38]

The road followed by Alboin to reach Italy has been the subject of controversy, as is the length of the trek. According to Neil Christie, the Lombards divided themselves into migrational groups, with a vanguard scouting the road, probably following thePoetovio–Celeia–Emona–Forum Iuliiroute, while the wagons and most of the people proceeded slowly behind because of the goods and chattels they brought with them, and possibly also because they were waiting for the Saxons to join them on the road. By September raiding parties were lootingVenetia,but it was probably only in 569 that theJulian Alpswere crossed at theVipava Valley;the eyewitnessSecundus of Nongives the date as 20 or 21 May.[9][28][30]The 569 date for the entry into Italy is not void of difficulties however, and Jörg Jarnut believes the conquest of most of Venetia had already been completed in 568. According to Carlo Guido Mor, a major difficulty remains in explaining how Alboin could have reached Milan on 3 September assuming he had passed the border only in the May of the same year.[31][40]

Invasion of Italy

edit

Foundation of the Duchy of Friuli

edit
"When Alboin without any hindrance had thence entered the territories of Venetia [...] – that is, the limits of the city or rather of the fortress of Forum Julii (Cividale) – he began to consider to whom he should especially commit the first of the provinces that he had taken. [...] he determined [...] to put over the city of Forum Julii and over its whole district, his nephew Gisulf [...] This Gisulf announced that he would not first undertake the government of the city and people unless Alboin would give him the" faras ", that is, the families or stocks of the Langobards that he himself wished to choose. And this was done"[42]
Paul the Deacon
Historia Langobardorum, Book II, Ch. 9

The Lombards penetrated into Italy without meeting any resistance from the border troops (milities limitanei). The Byzantine military resources available on the spot were scant and of dubious loyalty, and the border forts may well have been left unmanned. What seems certain is that archaeological excavations have found no sign of violent confrontation in the sites that have been excavated. This agrees with Paul the Deacon's narrative, who speaks of a Lombard takeover inFriuli"without any hindrance".[43]

The first town to fall into the Lombards' hands wasForum Iulii(Cividale del Friuli), the seat of the localmagister militum.[9]Alboin chose this walled town close to the frontier to be capital of theDuchy of Friuliand made his nephew andshield bearer,Gisulf,dukeof the region, with the specific duty of defending the borders from Byzantine or Avar attacks from the east. Gisulf obtained from his uncle the right to choose for his duchy thosefarae,or clans, that he preferred.[31][44][45]

Alboin's decision to create a duchy and designate a duke were both important innovations; until then, the Lombards had never had dukes or duchies based on a walled town. The innovation adopted was part of Alboin's borrowing of Roman and Ostrogothic administrative models, as in Late Antiquity thecomescivitatis(city count) was the main local authority, with full administrative powers in his region. But the shift from count (comes) to duke (dux) and from county (comitatus) to duchy (ducatus) also signalled the progressive militarization of Italy.[45]The selection of a fortified town as the centre for the new duchy was also an important change from the time in Pannonia, for while urbanized settlements had previously been ignored by the Lombards, now a considerable part of the nobility settled itself in Forum Iulii, a pattern that was repeated regularly by the Lombards in their other duchies.[46]

Conquest of Milan

edit

From Forum Iulii, Alboin next reachedAquileia,the most important road junction in the northeast,[47]and the administrative capital of Venetia. The imminent arrival of the Lombards had a considerable impact on the city's population; thePatriarch of AquileiaPaulinusfled with his clergy and flock to the island ofGradoin Byzantine-controlled territory.[9][48]

From Aquileia, Alboin took theVia Postumiaand swept through Venetia, taking in rapid successionTarvisium(Treviso),Vicentia(Vicenza),Verona,Brixia(Brescia) andBergomum(Bergamo). The Lombards faced difficulties only in takingOpitergium(Oderzo), which Alboin decided to avoid, as he similarly avoided tackling the main Venetian towns closer to the coast on theVia Annia,such asAltinum,Patavium(Padova),Mons Silicis(Monselice),MantuaandCremona.[9][47]The invasion of Venetia generated a considerable level of turmoil, spurring waves of refugees from the Lombard-controlled interior to the Byzantine-held coast, often led by their bishops, and resulting in new settlements such asTorcelloandHeraclia.[49][50][51]

Alboin moved west in his march, invading the region ofLiguria(north-west Italy) and reaching its capitalMediolanum(Milan) on 3 September 569, only to find it already abandoned by thevicariusItaliae(vicar of Italy), the authority entrusted with the administration of thediocese of Annonarian Italy.ArchbishopHonoratus,his clergy, and part of the laity accompanied thevicarius Italiaeto find a safe haven in the Byzantine port ofGenua(Genoa). Alboin counted the years of his reign from the capture of Milan when he assumed the title ofdominus Italiae(Lord of Italy). His success also meant the collapse of Byzantine defences in the northern part of thePo plain,and large movements of refugees to Byzantine areas.[4][9][52][53]

Several explanations have been advanced to explain the swiftness and ease of the initial Lombard advance in northern Italy. It has been suggested that the towns' doors may have been opened by the betrayal of the Gothic auxiliaries in the Byzantine army, but historians generally hold that Lombard's success occurred because Italy was not considered by Byzantium as a vital part of the empire, especially at a time when the empire was imperilled by the attacks of Avars andSlavsin theBalkansandSassanidsin the east. The Byzantine decision not to contest the Lombard invasion reflects the desire of Justinian's successors to reorient the core of the Empire's policies eastward.[53][54][55]

Impact of the migration on Annonarian Italy

edit

The impact of the Lombard migration on the Late Roman aristocracy was disruptive, especially in combination with the Gothic War; the latter conflict had finished in the north only in 562, when the last Gothic stronghold, Verona, was taken.[56]Many men of means (Paul'spossessores) either lost their lives or their goods, but the exact extent of the despoliation of the Roman aristocracy is a subject of heated debate.[54][57][58]The clergy was also greatly affected. The Lombards were mostly pagans and displayed little respect for the clergy and Church property. Many churchmen left theirseesto escape from the Lombards, like the two most senior bishops in the north, Honoratus and Paulinus. However, most of thesuffragan bishopsin the north sought an accommodation with the Lombards, as did in 569 the bishop of Tarvisium, Felix, when he journeyed to thePiave riverto parley with Alboin, obtaining respect for the Church and its goods in return for this act of homage. It seems certain that many sees maintained an uninterrupted episcopal succession through the turmoil of the invasion and the following years. The transition was eased by the hostility existing among the northern Italian bishops towards the papacy and the empire due to the religious dispute involving the "Three-Chapter Controversy".In Lombard territory, churchmen were at least sure to avoid imperial religious persecution.[54][59][60]

In the view of Pierre Riché, the disappearance of 220 bishops' seats indicates that the Lombard migration was a crippling catastrophe for the Church.[61]Yet according to Walter Pohl the regions directly occupied by Alboin suffered less devastation and had a relatively robust survival rate for towns, whereas the occupation of territory by autonomous military bands interested mainly in raiding and looting had a more severe impact, with the bishoprics in such places rarely surviving.[62]

Siege of Ticinum

edit
Main article:Siege of Pavia (569–572)
A modern rendering of Alboin's entrance into Ticinum

The first attested instance of strong resistance to Alboin's migration took place at the town ofTicinum(Pavia), which he started to besiege in 569 and captured only after three years. The town was of strategic importance, sitting at the confluence of the riversPoandTicinoand connected by waterways to Ravenna, the capital of Byzantine Italy and the seat of thePraetorian prefecture of Italy.Its fall cut direct communications between the garrisons stationed on theAlpes Maritimaeand theAdriatic coast.[9][31][63][64][65]

Careful to maintain the initiative against the Byzantines, by 570 Alboin had taken their last defences in northern Italy except for the coastal areas of Liguria and Venetia and a few isolated inland centres such asAugusta Praetoria(Aosta),Segusio(Susa), and the island ofAmacinain theLarius Lucus(Lake Como).[66]During Alboin's kingship the Lombards crossed theApenninesand plunderedTuscia,but historians are not in full agreement as to whether this took place under his guidance and if this constituted anything more than raiding. According toHerwig Wolfram,it was probably only in 578–579 thatTuscanywas conquered, but Jörg Jarnut and others believe this began in some form under Alboin, although it was not completed by the time of his death.[4][29][31][50][65]

Alboin's problems in maintaining control over his people worsened during the siege of Ticinum. The nature of the Lombard monarchy made it difficult for a ruler to exert the same degree of authority over his subjects as had been exercised by Theodoric over his Goths, and the structure of the army gave great authority to the military commanders orduces,who led each band (fara) of warriors. Additionally, the difficulties encountered by Alboin in building a solid political entity resulted from a lack of imperial legitimacy, as, unlike the Ostrogoths, they had not entered Italy asfoederatibut as enemies of the Empire.[9][50][67][68]

The king's disintegrating authority over his army was also manifested in the invasion of FrankishBurgundywhich from 569 or 570 was subject to yearly raids on a major scale. The Lombard attacks were ultimately repelled followingMummolus' victory atEmbrun.These attacks had lasting political consequences, souring the previously cordial Lombard-Frankish relations and opening the door to an alliance between the Empire and the Franks against the Lombards, a coalition agreed to byGuntramin about 571.[4][9][65][68][69]Alboin is generally thought not to have been behind this invasion, but an alternative interpretation of the transalpine raids presented by Gian Piero Bognetti is that Alboin may actually have been involved in the offensive on Guntram as part of an alliance with the Frankish king ofAustrasia,Sigebert I.This view is met with scepticism by scholars such asChris Wickham.[70]

The weakening of royal authority may also have resulted in the conquest of much of southern Italy by the Lombards, in which modern scholars believe Alboin played no role at all, probably taking place in 570 or 571 under the auspices of individual warlords. However it is far from certain that the Lombard takeover occurred during those years, as very little is known ofFaroaldandZotto's respective rises to power inSpoletium(Spoleto) andBeneventum(Benevento).[68][71][72][73]

Assassination

edit

Earliest narratives

edit
"When his wife Chlotsinda died, Albin married another wife whose father he had killed a short time before. For this reason, the woman always hated her husband and awaited an opportunity to avenge the wrong done to her father, and so it happened that she fell in love with one of the household slaves and poisoned her husband. When he died she went off with the slave but they were overtaken and put to death together."[74]
Gregory of Tours
Historia Francorum, Book II, Ch. 41

Ticinum eventually fell to the Lombards in either May or June 572. Alboin had in the meantime chosen Verona as his seat, establishing himself and his treasure in a royal palace built there by Theodoric. This choice may have been another attempt to link himself with the Gothic king.[9]

It was in this palace that Alboin was killed on 28 June 572. In the account given by Paul the Deacon, the most detailed narrative on Alboin's death, history and saga intermingle almost inextricably. Much earlier and shorter is the story told byMarius of Aventicumin hisChronica,written about a decade after Alboin's murder. According to his version, the king was killed in a conspiracy by a man close to him, calledHilmegis(Paul's Helmechis),[75]with the connivance of the queen. Helmichis then married the widow, but the two were forced to escape to Byzantine Ravenna, taking with them the royal treasure and part of the army, which hints at the cooperation of Byzantium.Roger Collinsdescribes Marius as an especially reliable source because of his early date and his having lived close to Lombard Italy.[4][9][76][77]

Also contemporary isGregory of Tours' account presented in theHistoria Francorum,and echoed by the laterFredegar.Gregory's account diverges in several respects from most other sources. In his tale it is told how Alboin married the daughter of a man he had slain, and how she waited for a suitable occasion for revenge, eventually poisoning him. She had previously fallen in love with one of her husband's servants, and after the assassination tried to escape with him, but they were captured and killed. However, historians including Walter Goffart place little trust in this narrative. Goffart notes other similar doubtful stories in theHistoriaand calls its account of Alboin's demise "a suitably ironic tale of the doings of depraved humanity".[16]

Skull cup

edit

Elements present in Marius' account are echoed in Paul'sHistoria Langobardorum,which also contains distinctive features. One of the best-known aspects unavailable in any other source is that of theskull cup.In Paul, the events that led to Alboin's downfall unfold in Verona. During a great feast, Alboin gets drunk and orders his wife Rosamund to drink from his cup, made from the skull of his father-in-law Cunimund after he had slain him in 567 and married Rosamund. Alboin "invited her to drink merrily with her father". This reignited the queen's determination to avenge her father.[61][78][79][80]

The fatal banquet as painted byPeter Paul Rubensin 1615

The tale has been often dismissed as a fable and Paul was conscious of the risk of disbelief. For this reason, he insists that he saw the skull cup personally during the 740s in the royal palace of Ticinum in the hands of kingRatchis.The use of skull cups has been noticed among nomadic peoples and, in particular, among the Lombards' neighbours, the Avars. Skull cups are believed to be part of ashamanisticritual, where drinking from the cup was considered a way to assume the dead man's powers. In this context, Stefano Gasparri and Wilfried Menghen see in Cunimund's skull cup the sign of nomadic cultural influences on the Lombards: by drinking from his enemy's skull Alboin was taking his vital strength. As for the offering of the skull to Rosamund, that may have been a ritual request of complete submission of the queen and her people to the Lombards, and thus a cause of shame or humiliation. Alternatively, it may have been a rite to appease the dead through the offering of a libation. In the latter interpretation, the queen's answer reveals her determination not to let the wound opened by the killing of her father be healed through a ritual act, thus openly displaying her thirst for revenge.[61][78][80]

The episode is read in a radically different way by Walter Goffart. According to him, the whole story assumes an allegorical meaning, with Paul intent on telling an edifying story of the downfall of the hero and his expulsion from the promised land, because of his human weakness. In this story, the skull cup plays a key role as it unitesoriginal sinand barbarism. Goffart does not exclude the possibility that Paul had really seen the skull but believes that by the 740s the connection between sin and barbarism as exemplified by the skull cup had already been established.[61][80]

Death

edit
Alboin is killed by Peredeo while Rosamund steals his sword, in a 19th-century painting byCharles Landseer

In her plan to kill her husband Rosamund found an ally in Helmichis, the king's foster brother andspatharius(arms bearer). According to Paul the queen then recruited the king'scubicularius(bedchamberlain), Peredeo, into the plot, after having seduced him. When Alboin retired for his midday rest on 28 June, care was taken to leave the door open and unguarded. Alboin's sword was also removed, leaving him defenceless when Peredeo entered his room and killed him.[4][79][81]Alboin's remains were allegedly buried beneath the palace steps.[16]

Peredeo's figure and role is mostly introduced by Paul; theOrigohad for the first time mentioned his name as "Peritheus", but there his role had been different, as he was not the assassin, but the instigator of the assassination. In the vein of his reading of the skull cup, Goffart sees Peredeo not as a historical figure but as an allegorical character: he notes a similarity between Peredeo's name and theLatinwordperditus,meaning "lost", a representation of those Lombards who entered into the service of the Empire.[82]

Alboin's death had a lasting impact, as it deprived the Lombards of the only leader they had that could have kept together the newborn Germanic entity. His end also represents the death of the last of the line of hero-kings that had led the Lombards through their migrations from the Elbe to Italy. His fame survived him for many centuries in epic poetry, with Saxons andBavarianscelebrating his prowess in battle, his heroism, and the magical properties of his weapons.[9][23][83]

Aftermath

edit
"Helmegis then, upon the death of his king, attempted to usurp his kingdom, but he could not at all do this, because the Langobards, grieving greatly for the king's death, strove to make way with him. And straightway Rosemund sent word to Longinus, prefect of Ravenna, that he should quickly send a ship to fetch them. Longinus, delighted by such a message, speedily sent a ship in which Helmegis with Rosemund his wife embarked, fleeing at night."[84]
Paul the Deacon
Historia Langobardorum, Book II, Ch. 29

To complete thecoup d'étatand legitimize his claim to the throne, Helmichis married the queen, whose high standing arose not only from being the king's widow but also from being the most prominent member of the remaining Gepid nation, and as such her support was a guarantee of the Gepids' loyalty to Helmichis. The latter could also count on the support of the Lombard garrison of Verona, where many may have opposed Alboin's aggressive policy and could have cultivated the hope of reaching an entente with the Empire. The Byzantines were almost certainly deeply involved in the plot. It was in their interest to stem the Lombard tide by bringing a pro-Byzantine regime into power in Verona, and possibly, in the long run, break the unity of the Lombards' kingdom, winning over the dukes with honours and emoluments.[9][64][81][85][86][87]

The coup ultimately failed, as it met with the resistance of most of the warriors, who were opposed to the king's assassination. As a result, the Lombard garrison in Ticinum proclaimed DukeClephthe new king, and Helmichis, rather than going to war against overwhelming odds, escaped to Ravenna with Longinus' assistance, taking with him his wife, his troops, the royal treasure and Alboin's daughterAlbsuinda.In Ravenna, the two lovers became estranged and killed each other. Subsequently, Longinus sent Albsuinda and the treasure toConstantinople.[85][86]

Lombard and Byzantine territories at Alboin's death (572)

Cleph kept the throne for only 18 months before being assassinated by aslave.Possibly he too was killed at the instigation of the Byzantines, who had every interest in avoiding a hostile and solid leadership among the Lombards. An important success for the Byzantines was that no king was proclaimed to succeed Cleph, opening adecade of interregnum,thus making them more vulnerable to attacks from the Franks and Byzantines. It was only when faced with the danger of annihilation by the Franks in 584 that the dukes elected a new king in the person ofAuthari,son of Cleph, who began the definitive consolidation and centralization of the Lombard kingdom while the remaining imperial territories were reorganized under the control of anexarchin Ravenna with the capacity to defend the country without the Emperor's assistance.[88][89][90][91]

The consolidation of Byzantine and Lombard dominions had long-lasting consequences for Italy, as the region was from that moment on fragmented among multiple rulers untilItalian unificationin 1871.[92]

Cultural references

edit
See also:Rosamund (wife of Alboin) § Rosamund in later culture

Alboin, together with other tribal leaders is mentioned in the 10th centuryOld Englishpoem calledWidsith(lines 70–75):

The historical period also formed the basis of the 1961 Italian adventure filmSword of the Conqueror(Italian:Rosmunda e Alboino,German titleAlboin, König der Langobarden), withJack Palanceas Alboin.

There have been several artistic depictions of events from Alboin's life includingPeter Paul Rubens'Alboin and Rosamunde(1615);Charles Landseer'sAssassination of Alboin, King of the Lombards(1856); andFortunino Matania's illustrationRosamund captive before King Alboin of the Lombards(1942).

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^Campbell, Mike."Meaning, origin and history of the name Alboin".Behind the Name.
  2. ^"The Encyclopaedia Britannica: Or, Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature".A. and C. Black. 29 June 2019 – via Google Books.
  3. ^Jarnut 1995, pp. 16–18
  4. ^abcdefghMartindale 1992,s.v. Alboin,pp. 38–40
  5. ^Rovagnati 2003, pp. 28–29
  6. ^Amory 2003, p. 462
  7. ^Wickham 1989, pp. 29–30
  8. ^Jarnut 1995, p. 21
  9. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstBertolini 1960, pp. 34–38.
  10. ^Rovagnati 2003, p. 28
  11. ^Ausenda 1999, p. 433
  12. ^Goffart 1988, p. 387
  13. ^Jarnut 1995, p. 25
  14. ^Wolfram 1997, p. 284
  15. ^abPohl 1997, p. 96
  16. ^abcGoffart 1988, p. 392
  17. ^Martindale 1992,s.v. Cunimundus,p. 364
  18. ^Rovagnati 2003, p. 30
  19. ^abJarnut 1995, p. 22
  20. ^Martindale 1992,s.v. Baduarius (2),pp. 64–65
  21. ^Pohl 1997, pp. 96–97
  22. ^Rovagnati 2003, pp. 30–31
  23. ^abGasparri 1990, p. 20
  24. ^Curta 2001, p. 204
  25. ^abJarnut 1995, p. 29
  26. ^abcdMoorhead 2005, p. 152
  27. ^Christie 1998, p. 60
  28. ^abcGasparri 1990, p. 25
  29. ^abcSchutz 2002, p. 82
  30. ^abChristie 1998, pp. 63–64
  31. ^abcdefJarnut 1995, p. 30
  32. ^Pohl 1997, p. 98
  33. ^abWolfram 1997, p. 286
  34. ^Jarnut 1995, pp. 29–30
  35. ^Whitby 2001, p. 91
  36. ^Christie 1998, pp. 60–63
  37. ^Pohl 1997, pp. 98–99
  38. ^abCollins 1991, p. 186
  39. ^Paul 1907, p. 329
  40. ^abPalmieri 1996, pp. 43–44
  41. ^Gasparri 1990, pp. 24–25
  42. ^Paul 1907, pp. 64–66
  43. ^Christie 1998, pp. 73, 76
  44. ^Christie 1998, pp. 93–94
  45. ^abWolfram 1997, pp. 287–288
  46. ^Christie 1998, p. 77
  47. ^abWolfram 1997, p. 288
  48. ^Madden 2004, p. 44
  49. ^Lane 1991, p. 7
  50. ^abcHumphries 2001, pp. 535–536
  51. ^Richards 1979, p. 34
  52. ^Christie 1998, p. 78
  53. ^abGasparri 1990, pp. 25–26
  54. ^abcJarnut 1995, p. 31
  55. ^Ostrogorsky 1993, p. 68
  56. ^Collins 1991, p. 187
  57. ^Wickham 2005, pp. 203, 210
  58. ^Moorhead 2005, pp. 156–157
  59. ^Wolfram 1997, pp. 288–289
  60. ^Richards 1979, pp. 37–38
  61. ^abcdSchutz 2001, p. 84
  62. ^Pohl 1997, pp. 124–125
  63. ^Christie 1998, p. 79
  64. ^abGasparri 1990, p. 26
  65. ^abcWolfram 1997, p. 290
  66. ^Rovagnati 2003, p. 36
  67. ^Azzara 2009, pp. 95–96
  68. ^abcPohl 1997, p. 99
  69. ^Jarnut 1995, p. 35
  70. ^Wickham 1989, pp. 30–31
  71. ^Palmieri 1996, pp. 52–53
  72. ^Moorhead 2005, p. 153
  73. ^Christie 1998, pp. 80–82
  74. ^Gregory 1916, p. 95
  75. ^Martindale 1992,s.v. Hilmegis,p. 599
  76. ^Collins 1991, pp. 187–188
  77. ^Jarnut 1995, pp. 31–32
  78. ^abGasparri 1990, pp. 19–21
  79. ^abWolfram 1997, p. 291
  80. ^abcGoffart 1988, pp. 391–392
  81. ^abJarnut 1995, p. 32
  82. ^Goffart 1988, p. 393
  83. ^Wolfram 1997, p. 285
  84. ^Paul 1907, p. 84
  85. ^abChristie 1998, p. 82
  86. ^abWolfram 1997, p. 292
  87. ^Azzara 2009, p. 96
  88. ^Schutz 2001, p. 85
  89. ^Gasparri 1990, pp. 26–28
  90. ^Wickham 1989, pp. 31–32
  91. ^Ostrogorsky 1993, p. 69.
  92. ^Wickham 2005, p. 35

References

edit
edit
Wikisourcehas the text of the1911Encyclopædia Britannicaarticle "Alboin".
Regnal titles
Preceded by King of the Lombards
560–572 		Succeeded by

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alboin&oldid=1251000402"