Area 51is the common name of a highly classifiedUnited States Air Force(USAF) facility within theNevada Test and Training Range.A remote detachment administered byEdwards Air Force Base,the facility is officially calledHomey Airport(ICAO:KXTA,FAALID:XTA)[2]orGroom Lake(afterthe salt flatnext to its airfield). Details of its operations are not made public, but the USAF says that it is an open training range,[3]and it is commonly thought to support the development and testing of experimental aircraft and weapons systems.[4][3]The USAF andCIAacquired the site in 1955, primarily for flight testing theLockheed U-2aircraft.[5]
Homey Airport | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NearRachel, Lincoln County, Nevadain United States | |||||||||||||||||
![]() Asatellite imagetaken in 2022 captured bySentinel-2ofESAshowing the base with Groom Lake just to the north-northeast | |||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||
Coordinates | 37°14′0″N115°48′30″W/ 37.23333°N 115.80833°W | ||||||||||||||||
Type | Development and testing facility | ||||||||||||||||
Site information | |||||||||||||||||
Owner | Department of Defense | ||||||||||||||||
Operator | United States Air Force | ||||||||||||||||
Controlled by | Air Force Materiel Command | ||||||||||||||||
Condition | Operational | ||||||||||||||||
Site history | |||||||||||||||||
Built | 1955 | (as Paradise Ranch)||||||||||||||||
In use | 1955–present | ||||||||||||||||
Events | Storm Area 51(2019) | ||||||||||||||||
Garrison information | |||||||||||||||||
Garrison | Air Force Test Center(Detachment 3) | ||||||||||||||||
Airfield information | |||||||||||||||||
Identifiers | ICAO:KXTA,FAA LID:XTA | ||||||||||||||||
Elevation | 4,494 feet (1,370 m)AMSL | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Sources:Jeppesen[2] |
The intense secrecy surrounding the base has made it the frequent subject ofconspiracy theoriesand a central component ofunidentified flying object(UFO) folklore.[6][7]It has never been declared a secret base, but all research and occurrences in Area 51 areTop Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information(TS/SCI).[8]The CIA publicly acknowledged the base's existence on 25 June 2013, following aFreedom of Information Act(FOIA) request filed in 2005, and declassified documents detailing its history and purpose.[9]
Area 51 is located in the southern portion ofNevada,83 miles (134 km) north-northwest ofLas Vegas.The surrounding area is a popular tourist destination, including the small town ofRachelon the "Extraterrestrial Highway".
Geography
Area 51
The original rectangular base of 6 by 10 miles (10 by 16 km) is now part of the so-called "Groom box", a rectangular area, measuring 23 by 25 miles (37 by 40 km), of restricted airspace. The area is connected to the internalNevada Test Site(NTS) road network, with paved roads leading south toMercuryand west toYucca Flat.Leading northeast from the lake, the wide and well-maintained Groom Lake Road runs through a pass in the Jumbled Hills. The road formerly led to mines in the Groom basin but has been improved since their closure. Its winding course runs past a security checkpoint, but the restricted area around the base extends farther east. After leaving the restricted area, Groom Lake Road descends eastward to the floor of theTikaboo Valley,passing the dirt-road entrances to several small ranches, before converging withState Route 375, the "Extraterrestrial Highway",south ofRachel.[10]
Area 51 shares a border with the Yucca Flat region of the Nevada Test Site, the location of 739 of the 928 nuclear tests conducted by theUnited States Department of Energyat NTS.[11][12][13]TheYucca Mountain nuclear waste repositoryis southwest of Groom Lake.[14]
Groom Lake
Groom Lakeis asalt flat[15]in Nevada used for runways of the Nellis Bombing Range Test Site airport (XTA/KXTA) on the north of the Area 51USAFmilitary installation. The lake at 4,409 ft (1,344 m) elevation is approximately3+3⁄4mi (6 km) from north to south and 3 mi (5 km) from east to west at its widest point.[16]Located within the namesake Groom Lake Valley portion of theTonopah Basin,the lake is 25 mi (40 km) south of Rachel, Nevada.[17]
History
The origin of the name "Area 51" is unclear. It is believed to be from anAtomic Energy Commission(AEC) numbering grid, although Area 51 is not part of this system; it is adjacent to Area 15. Another explanation is that 51 was used because it was unlikely that the AEC would use the number.[18]According to theCentral Intelligence Agency(CIA), the correct names for the facility are Homey Airport (XTA/KXTA) and Groom Lake,[19][20]though the name "Area 51" was used in a CIA document from theVietnam War.[21]The facility has also been referred to as "Dreamland" and "Paradise Ranch",[22]among other nicknames, with the former also being theapproach controlcall signfor the surrounding area.[23][24]The USAF public relations has referred to the facility as "an operating location near Groom Dry Lake". Thespecial use airspacearound the field is referred to as Restricted Area 4808 North (R-4808N).[25]
Lead and silver were discovered in the southern part of theGroom Rangein 1864,[26]and the English companyGroome Lead Mines Limitedfinanced the Conception Mines in the 1870s, giving the district its name (nearby mines included Maria, Willow, and White Lake).[27]J. B. Osborne and partners acquired the controlling interest in Groom in 1876, and Osborne's son acquired it in the 1890s.[27]Mining continued until 1918, then resumed after World War II until the early 1950s.[27]
The airfield on the Groom Lake site began service in 1942 asIndian Springs Air Force Auxiliary Field[28]and consisted of two unpaved 5,000-foot (1,524 m) runways.[29]
U-2 program
TheCentral Intelligence Agency(CIA) established the Groom Lake test facility in April 1955 for Project AQUATONE: the development of theLockheed U-2strategic reconnaissance aircraft. Project directorRichard M. Bissell Jr.understood that the flight test and pilot training programs could not be conducted atEdwards Air Force Baseor Lockheed's Palmdale facility, given the extreme secrecy surrounding the project. He conducted a search for a suitable testing site for the U-2 under the same extreme security as the rest of the project.[30]: 25 He notified Lockheed, who sent an inspection team out to Groom Lake. According to Lockheed's U-2 designerKelly Johnson:[30]: 26
We flew over it and within thirty seconds, you knew that was the place[...] it was right by a dry lake. Man alive, we looked at that lake, and we all looked at each other. It was another Edwards, so we wheeled around, landed on that lake, taxied up to one end of it. It was a perfect natural landing field[...] as smooth as a billiard table without anything being done to it.
The lake bed made an ideal strip for testing aircraft, and the Emigrant Valley's mountain ranges and the NTS perimeter protected the site from visitors; it was about 100 mi (160 km) north of Las Vegas.[31]The CIA asked the AEC to acquire the land, designated "Area 51" on the map, and to add it to the Nevada Test Site.[9]: 56–57
Johnson named the area "Paradise Ranch" to encourage workers to move to "the new facility in the middle of nowhere", as the CIA later described it, and the name became shortened to "the Ranch".[9]: 57 On 4May 1955, a survey team arrived at Groom Lake and laid out a 5,000-foot (1,500 m) north–south runway on the southwest corner of the lakebed and designated a site for a base support facility. The Ranch initially consisted of little more than a few shelters, workshops, and trailer homes in which to house its small team.[31]A little over three months later, the base consisted of a single paved runway, three hangars, a control tower, and rudimentary accommodations for test personnel. The base's few amenities included a movie theater and volleyball court. There was also a mess hall, several wells, and fuel storage tanks. CIA, Air Force, and Lockheed personnel began arriving by July 1955. The Ranch received its first U-2 delivery on 24 July 1955 from Burbank on aC-124 Globemaster IIcargo plane, accompanied by Lockheed technicians on aDouglas DC-3.[31]Regular Military Air Transport Service flights were set up between Area 51 and Lockheed's offices inBurbank, California.To preserve secrecy, personnel flew to Nevada on Monday mornings and returned to California on Friday evenings.[9]: 72
OXCART program
Project OXCART was established in August 1959 for "antiradar studies, aerodynamic structural tests, and engineering designs" and all later work on theLockheed A-12.[32]This included testing at Groom Lake, which had inadequate facilities consisting of buildings for only 150 people, a 5,000 ft (1,500 m) asphalt runway, and limited fuel, hangar, and shop space.[30]: 58 Groom Lake had received the name "Area 51"[30]: 59 [33]when A-12 test facility construction began in September 1960, including a new 8,500 ft (2,600 m) runway to replace the existing runway.[34]
Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company (REECo) began construction of "Project 51" on 1October 1960 with double-shift construction schedules. The contractor upgraded base facilities and built a new 10,000 ft (3,000 m) runway (14/32) diagonally across the southwest corner of the lakebed. They marked anArchimedean spiralon the dry lake approximately two miles (three kilometers) across so that an A-12 pilot approaching the end of the overrun could abort instead of plunging into the sagebrush. Area 51 pilots called it "The Hook". For crosswind landings, they marked two unpaved airstrips (runways 9/27 and 03/21) on the dry lakebed.[35]
By August 1961, construction of the essential facilities was complete; three surplus Navy hangars were erected on the base's north side while hangar7 was new construction. The original U-2 hangars were converted to maintenance and machine shops. Facilities in the maincantonmentarea included workshops and buildings for storage and administration, a commissary, a control tower, a fire station, and housing. The Navy also contributed more than 130 surplus Babbitt duplex housing units for long-term occupancy facilities. Older buildings were repaired, and additional facilities were constructed as necessary. A reservoir pond surrounded by trees served as a recreational area one mile (1.5 kilometers) north of the base. Other recreational facilities included a gymnasium, a movie theater, and a baseball diamond.[35]A permanent aircraft fuel tank farm was constructed by early 1962 for the specialJP-7fuel required by the A-12. Seven tanks were constructed, with a total capacity of 1,320,000 U.S. gallons (5,000,000 liters).[30]: 58
Security was enhanced for the arrival of OXCART and the small mine was closed in the Groom basin. In January 1962, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) expanded the restricted airspace in the vicinity of Groom Lake, and the lakebed became the center of a 600-square-mile (1,600-square-kilometer) addition to restricted area R-4808N.[35]The CIA facility received eight USAFF-101 Voodoosfor training, twoT-33 Shooting Startrainers for proficiency flying, aC-130 Herculesfor cargo transport, aU-3Afor administrative purposes, a helicopter for search and rescue, and aCessna 180for liaison use, and Lockheed provided anF-104 Starfighterfor use as a chase plane.[35]
The first A-12 test aircraft was covertly trucked from Burbank on 26 February 1962 and arrived at Groom Lake on 28 February.[30]: 60 It made its first flight 26 April 1962 when the base had over 1,000 personnel.[30]: 60–62 The closed airspace above Groom Lake was within theNellis Air Force Rangeairspace, and pilots saw the A-12 20 to 30 times.[30]: 63–64 Groom was also the site of the firstLockheed D-21drone test flight on 22 December 1964.[30]: 123 By the end of 1963, nine A-12s were at Area 51, assigned to the CIA-operated "1129th Special Activities Squadron".[36]
D-21 Tagboard
Following the loss ofGary Powers'U-2over the Soviet Union, there were several discussions about using the A-12 OXCART as an unpiloted drone aircraft. Although Kelly Johnson had come to support the idea of drone reconnaissance, he opposed the development of an A-12 drone, contending that the aircraft was too large and complex for such a conversion. However, the Air Force agreed to fund the study of a high-speed, high-altitude drone aircraft in October 1962. The Air Force interest seems to have moved the CIA to take action, the project designated "Q-12". By October 1963, the drone's design had been finalized. At the same time, the Q-12 underwent a name change. To separate it from the other A-12-based projects, it was renamed the "D-21". (The "12" was reversed to "21" ). "Tagboard" was the project's code name.[30]: 121
The first D-21 was completed in the spring of 1964 by Lockheed. After four more months of checkouts and static tests, the aircraft was shipped to Groom Lake and reassembled. It was to be carried by a two-seat derivative of the A-12, designated the "M-21". When the D-21/M-21 reached the launch point, the first step would be to blow off the D-21's inlet and exhaust covers. With the D-21/M-21 at the correct speed and altitude, the LCO would start the ramjet and the other systems of the D-21. "With the D-21's systems activated and running, and the launch aircraft at the correct point, the M-21 would begin a slight pushover, the LCO would push a final button, and the D-21 would come off the pylon".[30]: 122
Difficulties were addressed throughout 1964 and 1965 at Groom Lake with various technical issues. Captive flights showed unforeseen aerodynamic difficulties. By late January 1966, more than a year after the first captive flight, everything seemed ready. The first D-21 launch was made on 5March 1966 with a successful flight, with the D-21 flying 120 miles with limited fuel. A second D-21 flight was successful in April 1966 with the drone flying 1,200 miles, reaching Mach 3.3 and 90,000 feet. An accident on 30 July 1966 with a fully fueled D-21, on a planned checkout flight, suffered from anunstartof the drone after its separation, causing it to collide with the M-21 launch aircraft. The two crewmen ejected and landed in the ocean 150 miles offshore. One crew member was picked up by a helicopter, but the other, having survived the aircraft breakup and ejection, drowned when sea water entered his pressure suit. Kelly Johnson personally cancelled the entire program, having had serious doubts about its feasibility from the start. A number of D-21s had already been produced, and rather than scrapping the whole effort, Johnson again proposed to the Air Force that they be launched from aB-52Hbomber.[30]: 125
By late summer of 1967, the modification work to both the D-21 (now designated D-21B) and the B-52Hs was complete. The test program could now resume. The test missions were flown out of Groom Lake, with the actual launches over the Pacific. The first D-21B to be flown was Article 501, the prototype. The first attempt was made on 28 September 1967 and ended in complete failure. As the B-52 was flying toward the launch point, the D-21B fell off the pylon. The B-52H gave a sharp lurch as the drone fell free. The booster fired and was "quite a sight from the ground". The failure was traced to a stripped nut on the forward right attachment point on the pylon. Several more tests were made, none of which met with success. However, the fact is that the resumptions of D-21 tests took place against a changing reconnaissance background. The A-12 had finally been allowed to deploy, and theSR-71was soon to replace it. At the same time, new developments in reconnaissance satellite technology were nearing operation. Up to this point, the limited number of satellites available restricted coverage to the Soviet Union. A new generation of reconnaissance satellites could soon cover targets anywhere in the world. The satellites' resolution would be comparable to that of aircraft but without the slightest political risk. Time was running out for the Tagboard.[30]: 129
Several more test flights, including two over China, were made fromBeale AFB,California, in 1969 and 1970, to varying degrees of success. On 15 July 1971, Kelly Johnson received a wire canceling the D-21B program. The remaining drones were transferred by a C-5A and placed in dead storage. The tooling used to build the D-21Bs was ordered destroyed. Like the A-12 Oxcart, the D-21B Tagboard drones remained a Black airplane, even in retirement. Their existence was not suspected until August 1976, when the first group was placed in storage at theDavis-Monthan AFBMilitary Storage and Disposition Center.A second group arrived in 1977. They were labeled "GTD-21Bs" (GT stood for ground training).[30]: 132
Davis-Monthan is an open base, with public tours of the storage area at the time, so the odd-looking drones were soon spotted and photos began appearing in magazines. Speculation about the D-21Bs circulated within aviation circles for years, and it was not until 1982 that details of the Tagboard program were released. However, it was not until 1993 that the B-52/D-21B program was made public. That same year, the surviving D-21Bs were released to museums.[30]: 132–133
Foreign technology evaluation
During theCold War,one of the missions carried out by the United States was the test and evaluation of capturedSovietfighter aircraft. Beginning in the late 1960s, and for several decades, Area 51 played host to an assortment of Soviet-built aircraft.[citation needed]
Munir Redfa's defection with aMikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21from Iraq for Israel'sMossadinOperation Diamondled to theHAVE DOUGHNUT,HAVE DRILLand HAVE FERRY programs. The first MiGs flown in the United States were used to evaluate the aircraft in performance, technical, and operational capabilities, pitting the types against U.S. fighters.[37]
This was not a new mission, as testing of foreign technology by the USAF began during World War II. After the war, testing of acquired foreign technology was performed by theAir Technical Intelligence Center(ATIC, which became very influential during theKorean War), under the direct command of the Air Materiel Control Department. In 1961, ATIC became the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) and was reassigned toAir Force Systems Command.ATIC personnel were sent anywhere where foreign aircraft could be found.[citation needed]
The focus ofAir Force Systems Commandlimited the use of the fighter as a tool with which to train thefront linetactical fighter pilots.[37]Air Force Systems Command recruited its pilots from theAir Force Flight Test CenteratEdwards Air Force Base,California, who were usually graduates from various test pilot schools.Tactical Air Commandselected its pilots primarily from the ranks of theWeapons Schoolgraduates.[37]
In August 1966,Iraqi Air Forcefighter pilot CaptainMunir Redfadefected,flying hisMiG-21to Israel after being ordered to attack Iraqi Kurd villages with napalm. His aircraft was transferred to Groom Lake in late 1967 for study. Israel loaned the MiG-21 to the US Air Force from January 1968 to April 1968.[38]In 1968, the US Air Force and Navy jointly formed a project known asHAVE DOUGHNUTin which Air Force Systems Command, Tactical Air Command, and the U.S. Navy's Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Four (VX-4) flew this acquired Soviet-made aircraft in simulated air combat training.[37]As U.S. possession of the Soviet MiG-21 was, itself, secret, it was tested at Groom Lake. A joint Air Force-Navy team was assembled for a series of dogfight tests.[30]: 219
Comparisons between the F-4 and the MiG-21 indicated that, on the surface, they were evenly matched. The HAVE DOUGHNUT tests showed the skill of the man in the cockpit was what made the difference. When the Navy or Air Force pilots flew the MiG-21, the results were a draw; the F-4 would win some fights, the MiG-21 would win others. There were no clear advantages. The problem was not with the planes, but with the pilots flying them. The pilots would not fly either plane to its limits. One of the Navy pilots was Marland W. "Doc" Townsend, then commander ofVF-121,the F-4 training squadron atNAS Miramar.He was an engineer and a Korean War veteran and had flown almost every Navy aircraft. When he flew against the MiG-21, he would outmaneuver it every time. The Air Force pilots would not go vertical in the MiG-21. The HAVE DOUGHNUT project officer was Tom Cassidy, a pilot withVX-4,the Navy's Air Development Squadron atPoint Mugu.He had been watching as Townsend "waxed" the Air Force MiG-21 pilots. Cassidy climbed into the MiG-21 and went up against Townsend's F-4. This time the result was far different. Cassidy was willing to fight in the vertical, flying the plane to the point where it was buffeting, just above the stall. Cassidy was able to get on the F-4's tail. After the flight, they realized the MiG-21 turned better than the F-4 at lower speeds. The key was for the F-4 to keep its speed up. An F-4 had defeated the MiG-21; the weakness of the Soviet plane had been found. Further test flights confirmed what was learned. It was also clear that the MiG-21 was a formidable enemy. United States pilots would have to fly much better than they had been to beat it. This would require a special school to teach advanced air combat techniques.[30]: 220–221
On 12 August 1968, two Syrian air force lieutenants, Walid Adham and Radfan Rifai, took off in a pair ofMiG-17Fs on a training mission. They lost their way and, believing they were over Lebanon, landed at theBetzetLanding Field in northern Israel. (One version has it that they were led astray by an Arabic-speaking Israeli).[30]Prior to the end of 1968 these MiG-17s were transferred from Israeli stocks and added to the Area 51 test fleet. The aircraft were given USAF designations and fake serial numbers so that they could be identified in DOD standard flight logs. As in the earlier program, a small group of Air Force and Navy pilots conducted mock dogfights with the MiG-17s. Selected instructors from the Navy's Top Gun school atNAS Miramar,California, were chosen to fly against the MiGs for familiarization purposes. Very soon, the MiG-17's shortcomings became clear. It had an extremely simple, even crude, control system that lacked the power-boosted controls of American aircraft. The F-4's twin engines were so powerful it could accelerate out of range of the MiG-17's guns in thirty seconds. It was important for the F-4 to keep its distance from the MiG-17. As long as the F-4 was one and a half miles from the MiG-17, it was outside the reach of the Soviet fighter's guns, but the MiG was within reach of the F-4's missiles.[30]: 222–225
The data from the HAVE DOUGHNUT and HAVE DRILL tests were provided to the newly formedTop Gunschool atNAS Miramar.By 1970, the HAVE DRILL program was expanded; a few selected fleet F-4 crews were given the chance to fight the MiGs. The most important result of Project HAVE DRILL is that no Navy pilot who flew in the project defeated the MiG-17 Fresco in the first engagement. The HAVE DRILL dogfights were by invitation only. The other pilots based at Nellis Air Force Base were not to know about the U.S.-operated MiGs. To prevent any sightings, the airspace above the Groom Lake range was closed. On aeronautical maps, the exercise area was marked in red ink. The forbidden zone became known as "Red Square".[30]: 226
During the remainder of theVietnam War,the Navy kill ratio climbed to 8.33 to 1. In contrast, the Air Force rate improved only slightly to 2.83 to 1. The reason for this difference was Top Gun. The Navy had revitalized its air combat training, while the Air Force had stayed stagnant. Most of the Navy MiG kills were by Top Gun graduates.[30]: 231
In May 1973, Project HAVE IDEA was formed, which took over from the older HAVE DOUGHNUT, HAVE FERRY and HAVE DRILL projects, and the project was transferred to theTonopah Test Range Airport.At Tonopah, testing of foreign technology aircraft continued and expanded throughout the 1970s and 1980s.[37]
Area 51 also hosted another foreign materiel evaluation program called HAVE GLIB. This involved testing Soviet tracking and missile control radar systems. A complex of actual and replica Soviet-type threat systems began to grow around "Slater Lake", a mile northwest of the main base, along with an acquired Soviet "Barlock" search radar placed atTonopah Air Force Station.They were arranged to simulate a Soviet-style air defense complex.[37]
The Air Force began funding improvements to Area 51 in 1977 under project SCORE EVENT. In 1979, the CIA transferred jurisdiction of the Area 51 site to the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards AFB, California. Sam Mitchell, the last CIA commander of Area 51, relinquished command to USAF Lt. Col. Larry D. McClain.[37]
In 2017, a USAF aircraft crashed at the site, killing the pilot, Lt. Colonel Eric "Doc" Schultz. The USAF refused to release further information regarding the crash. In 2022, unconfirmed reports emerged that the crash involved anSU-27that was part of the classified Foreign Materials Exploitation program. The reports claimed that the aircraft suffered a technical issue that resulted in both crew members ejecting from the aircraft, resulting in the death of Schultz.[39]
Have Blue/F-117 program
TheLockheed Have Blueprototype stealth fighter (a smaller proof-of-concept model of theF-117 Nighthawk) first flew at Groom in December 1977.[40]
In 1978, the Air Force awarded a full-scale development contract for the F-117 to Lockheed Corporation's Advanced Development Projects. On 17 January 1981 the Lockheed test team at Area 51 accepted delivery of the first full-scale development (FSD) prototype79–780,designated YF-117A. At 6:05 am on 18 June 1981 Lockheed Skunk Works test pilot Hal Farley lifted the nose of YF-117A79–780off the runway of Area 51.[41]
Meanwhile,Tactical Air Command(TAC) decided to set up a group-level organization to guide the F-117A to an initial operating capability. That organization became the 4450th Tactical Group (Initially designated "A Unit" ), which officially activated on 15 October 1979 atNellis AFB,Nevada, although the group was physically located at Area 51. The 4450th TG also operated the A-7D Corsair II as a surrogate trainer for the F-117A, and these operations continued until 15 October 1982 under the guise of an avionics test mission.[41]
Flying squadrons of the 4450th TG were the 4450th Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "I Unit" ) activated on 11 June 1981, and 4451st Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "P Unit" ) on 15 January 1983. The 4450th TS, stationed at Area 51, was the first F-117A squadron, while the 4451st TS was stationed at Nellis AFB and was equipped withA-7D Corsair IIspainted in a dark motif, tail coded "LV". Lockheed test pilots put the YF-117 through its early paces. A-7Ds were used for pilot training before any F-117As had been delivered by Lockheed to Area 51, later the A-7D's were used for F-117A chase testing and other weapon tests at the Nellis Range. On 15 October 1982, Major Alton C. Whitley Jr. became the first USAF 4450th TG pilot to fly the F-117A.[41]
Although ideal for testing, Area 51 was not a suitable location for an operational group, so a new covert base had to be established for F-117 operations.[42]Tonopah Test Range Airportwas selected for operations of the first USAF F-117 unit, the4450th Tactical Group(TG).[43]From October 1979, the Tonopah Airport base was reconstructed and expanded. The 6,000-foot runway was lengthened to 10,000 feet. Taxiways, a concrete apron, a large maintenance hangar, and a propane storage tank were added.[44]
By early 1982, four more YF-117As were operating at the base.[30]: 162 After finding a large scorpion in their offices, the testing team (Designated "R Unit" ) adopted it as their mascot and dubbed themselves the "Baja Scorpions".[45]Testing of a series of ultra-secret prototypes continued at Area 51 until mid-1981 when testing transitioned to the initial production of F-117 stealth fighters. The F-117s were moved to and from Area 51 by C-5 during darkness to maintain security. The aircraft were defueled, disassembled, cradled, and then loaded aboard the C-5 at night, flown to Lockheed, and unloaded at night before reassembly and flight testing. Groom performed radar profiling, F-117 weapons testing, and training of the first group of frontline USAF F-117 pilots.[30]: 161
While the "Baja Scorpions" were working on the F-117, there was also another group at work in secrecy, known as "the Whalers" working on Tacit Blue. Afly-by-wiretechnology demonstration aircraft with curved surfaces and composite material, to evade radar, was a prototype, and never went into production. Nevertheless, this strange-looking aircraft was responsible for many of thestealth technologyadvances that were used on several other aircraft designs, and had a direct influence on the B-2; with the first flight ofTacit Bluebeing performed on 5February 1982, byNorthrop Grummantest pilot,Richard G. Thomas.[30]: 249–250
Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG.[45]
On 17 May 1982, the move of the 4450th TG from Groom Lake to Tonopah was initiated, with the final components of the move completed in early 1983. Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG at Tonopah.[45]
The R-Unit was inactivated on 30 May 1989. Upon inactivation, the unit was reformed as Detachment 1,57th Fighter Weapons Wing(FWW). In 1990, the last F-117A (843) was delivered from Lockheed. After completion of acceptance flights at Area 51 of this last new F-117A aircraft, the flight test squadron continued flight test duties of refurbished aircraft after modifications by Lockheed. In February/March 1992 the test unit moved from Area 51 to the USAF PalmdalePlant 42and was integrated with theAir Force Systems Command6510th Test Squadron.Some testing, especially RCS verification and other classified activity was still conducted at Area 51 throughout the operational lifetime of the F-117. The recently inactivated (2008)410th Flight Test Squadrontraces its roots, if not its formal lineage to the 4450th TG R-unit.[45]
Later operations
Since the F-117 became operational in 1983, operations at Groom Lake have continued. The base and its associated runway system were expanded, including the expansion of housing and support facilities.[20][46]In 1995, the federal government expanded the exclusionary area around the base to include nearby mountains that had hitherto afforded the only decent overlook of the base, prohibiting access to 3,972 acres (16.07 km2) of land formerly administered by theBureau of Land Management.[20]
Legal status
U.S. government's positions on Area 51
The United States government has provided minimal information regarding Area 51. The area surrounding the lake is permanently off-limits to both civilian and normal military air traffic. Security clearances are checked regularly; cameras and weaponry are not allowed.[7]Even military pilots training in theNAFRrisk disciplinary action if they stray into the exclusionary "box" surrounding Groom's airspace.[7]Surveillance is supplemented using buried motion sensors.[47]Area 51 is a common destination forJanet,a small fleet of passenger aircraft operated on behalf of the Air Force to transport military personnel, primarily fromHarry Reid International Airport.[48]
TheUnited States Geological Survey(USGS) topographic map for the area only shows the long-disusedGroom Mine,[49]but USGS aerial photographs of the site in 1959 and 1968 were publicly available.[50]A civil aviation chart published by theNevada Department of Transportationshows a large restricted area, defined as part of the Nellis restricted airspace.[51]TheNational Atlasshows the area as lying within the Nellis Air Force Base.[52]There are higher resolution and newer images available from other satellite imagery providers, including Russian providers and theIKONOS.[20]These show the runway markings, base facilities, aircraft, and vehicles.[20]
In 1998 USAF officially acknowledged the site's existence.[50]On 25 June 2013, the CIA released an official history of the U-2 and OXCART projects which acknowledged that the U-2 was tested at Area 51, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in 2005 by Jeffrey T. Richelson ofGeorge Washington University'sNational Security Archive.It contains numerous references to Area 51 and Groom Lake, along with a map of the area.[9]Media reports stated that releasing the CIA history was the first governmental acknowledgement of Area 51's existence;[53][54][15]rather, it was the first official acknowledgement of specific activity at the site.[50]
Environmental lawsuit
In 1994, five unnamed civilian contractors and the widows of contractors Walter Kasza and Robert Frost sued the Air Force and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. They alleged that they had been present when large quantities of unknown chemicals had been burned in open pits and trenches at Groom.Rutgers Universitybiochemists analyzed biopsies from the complainants and found high levels ofdioxin,dibenzofuran,andtrichloroethylenein their body fat. The complainants alleged that they had sustained skin, liver, and respiratory injuries due to their work at Groom and that this had contributed to the deaths of Frost and Kasza. The suit sought compensation for the injuries, claiming that the Air Force had illegally handled toxic materials and that the EPA had failed in its duty to enforce theResource Conservation and Recovery Actwhich governs the handling of dangerous materials. They also sought detailed information about the chemicals, hoping that this would facilitate the medical treatment of survivors.[55]CongressmanLee H. Hamilton,former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told60 MinutesreporterLesley Stahl,"The Air Force is classifying all information about Area 51 in order to protect themselves from a lawsuit."[56]
The government invoked theState Secrets Privilegeand petitioned U.S. District Judge Philip Pro to disallow disclosure of classified documents or examination of secret witnesses, claiming that this would expose classified information and threaten national security.[57]Judge Pro rejected the government's argument, so PresidentBill Clintonissued aPresidential Determinationexempting what it called "the Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada" from environmental disclosure laws. Consequently, Pro dismissed the suit due to lack of evidence.Jonathan Turley,the attorney who was handling the lawsuit, appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the grounds that the government was abusing its power to classify material. Secretary of the Air ForceSheila E. Widnallfiled a brief which stated that disclosures of the materials present in the air and water near Groom "can reveal military operational capabilities or the nature and scope of classified operations." The Ninth Circuit rejected Turley's appeal[58]and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear it, putting an end to the complainants' case.[55]
The President annually issues a determination continuing the Groom exception[59][60][61]which is the only formal recognition that the government has ever given that Groom Lake is more than simply another part of the Nellis complex. An unclassified memo on the safe handling ofF-117 Nighthawkmaterial was posted on an Air Force web site in 2005. This discussed the same materials for which the complainants had requested information, which the government had claimed was classified. The memo was removed shortly after journalists became aware of it.[62]
Civil aviation identification
In December 2007, pilots noticed that the base had appeared in their aircraft navigation systems' latestJeppesendatabase revision with theICAOairport identifier code of KXTA and listed as "Homey Airport".[63]The probably inadvertent release of the airport data led to advice by theAircraft Owners and Pilots Association(AOPA) that student pilots should be explicitly warned about KXTA, not to consider it as a waypoint or destination for any flight even though it now appears in public navigation databases.[63]
Security
The perimeter of the base is marked out by orange posts and patrolled by guards in white pickup trucks and camouflage fatigues. The guards are popularly referred to as "camo dudes" by enthusiasts.[64][65]The guards will not answer questions about their employers; however, according to the New YorkDaily News,there are indications they are employed through a contractor such asAECOM.[65][66]Signage around the base perimeter advises that deadly force is authorized againsttrespassers.[67]
Technology is also heavily used to maintain the border of the base; this includessurveillance camerasand motion detectors. Some of these motion detectors are placed some distance away from the base on public land to notify guards of people approaching.[68]
1974 Skylab photography
Dwayne A. Daypublished "Astronauts and Area 51: theSkylabIncident "inThe Space Reviewin January 2006. It was based on a memo written in 1974 to CIA directorWilliam Colbyby an unknown CIA official. The memo reported that astronauts on board Skylab had inadvertently photographed a certain location:[69]
There were specific instructions not to do this. [redacted] was the only location which had such an instruction.
The name of the location was obscured,[b]but the context led Day to believe that the subject was Groom Lake. Day wrote that "the CIA considered no other spot on Earth to be as sensitive as Groom Lake". Even within the agency'sNational Photographic Interpretation Centerthat handled classified reconnaissance satellite photographs, images of the site were removed from film rolls and stored separately as not allphoto interpretershadsecurity clearancefor the information.[69][71]The memo details debate between federal agencies regarding whether the images should be classified, withDepartment of Defenseagencies arguing that it should andNASAand theState Departmentarguing that it should not be classified. The memo itself questions the legality of retroactively classifying unclassified images.[69]
The memo includes handwritten remarks,[72]apparently byDirector of Central IntelligenceColby:
[Secretary of StateRusk] did raise it—said State Dept. people felt strongly. But he inclined leave decision to me (DCI)—I confessed some question over need to protect since:
- USSRhas it from own sats
- What really does it reveal?
- If exposed, don't we just say classified USAF work is done there?
The declassified documents do not disclose the outcome of discussions regarding the Skylab imagery. The debate proved moot, as the photograph appeared in the Federal Government's Archive of Satellite Imagery along with the remaining Skylab photographs.[73]
2019 shooting incident
On 28 January 2019, an unidentified man drove through a security checkpoint nearMercury, Nevada,in an apparent attempt to enter the base. After an 8-mile (13-kilometer) vehicle pursuit by base security, the man exited his vehicle carrying a "cylindrical object" and was shot dead byNNSSsecurity officers and sheriff's deputies after refusing to obey requests to halt. There were no other injuries reported.[74][75]
UFO and other conspiracy theories
Area 51 has become a focus of modern conspiracy theories due to its secretive nature and connection to classified aircraft research.[8]Theories include:
- The storage, examination, and reverse engineering of crashed alien spacecraft, including material supposedly recovered atRoswell,the study of their occupants, and the manufacture of aircraft based on alien technology
- Meetings or joint undertakings with extraterrestrials
- The development of exoticenergy weaponsfor theStrategic Defense Initiative(SDI) or other weapons programs
- The development of weather control
- The development of time travel and teleportation technology
- The development of exotic propulsion systems related to theAurora Program
- Activities related to the conspiracy theory of aone-world government
Many of the hypotheses concern underground facilities at Groom or atPapoose Lake(also known as "S-4 location" ), 8.5 miles (13.7 km) south, and include claims of a transcontinental underground railroad system, a disappearing airstrip nicknamed the "Cheshire Airstrip", afterLewis Carroll'sCheshire cat,which briefly appears when water is sprayed onto its camouflaged asphalt, and engineering based on alien technology.[76]
In the mid-1950s, civilian aircraft flew under 20,000 feet while military aircraft flew up to 40,000 feet. The U-2 began flying above 60,000 feet and there was an increasing number of UFO sighting reports. Sightings occurred most often during early evening hours, when airline pilots flying west saw the U-2's silver wings reflect the setting sun, giving the aircraft a "fiery" appearance. Many sighting reports came to the Air Force'sProject Blue Book,which investigated UFO sightings, through air-traffic controllers and letters to the government. The project checked U-2 and laterOXCARTflight records to eliminate the majority of UFO reports that it received during the late 1950s and 1960s, although it could not reveal to the letter writers the truth behind what they saw.[9]: 72–73 Similarly, veterans of experimental projects such as OXCART at Area 51 agree that their work inadvertently prompted many of the UFO sightings and other rumors:[77]
The shape of OXCART was unprecedented, with its wide, disk-like fuselage designed to carry vast quantities of fuel. Commercial pilots cruising over Nevada at dusk would look up and see the bottom of OXCART whiz by at 2,000-plus mph. The aircraft's titanium body, moving as fast as a bullet, would reflect the sun's rays in a way that could make anyone think,UFO.[78]
They believe that the rumors helped maintain secrecy over Area 51's actual operations.[7]The veterans deny the existence of a vast underground railroad system.[78]
On October 14, 1988, the syndicated television broadcastUFO Coverup? Liveintroduced Americans to theMajestic 12hoax.[79][80]It featured the first public mention of Nevada's Area 51 as a site associated with aliens.[81]
Bob Lazarclaimed in 1989 that he had worked at Area 51's "Sector Four (S-4)", said to be located underground inside thePapoose Rangenear Papoose Lake. He claimed that he was contracted to work with alien spacecraft that the government had in its possession.[82]Similarly, the 1996 documentaryDreamlanddirected byBruce Burgessincluded an interview with a 71-year-old mechanical engineer who claimed to be a former employee at Area 51 during the 1950s. His claims included that he had worked on a "flying disc simulator" which had been based on a disc originating from a crashed extraterrestrial craft and was used to train pilots. He also claimed to have worked with an extraterrestrial being named "J-Rod" and described as a "telepathic translator".[83]In 2004, Dan Burisch (pseudonym of Dan Crain) claimed to have worked on cloning alien viruses at Area 51, also alongside the alien named "J-Rod". Burisch's scholarly credentials are the subject of much debate, as he was apparently working as a Las Vegas parole officer in 1989 while also earning a PhD atState University of New York(SUNY).[84]
In July 2019, more than 2,000,000 people responded to ajoke proposal to storm Area 51which appeared in an anonymous Facebook post.[85][86][87]The event, scheduled for 20 September 2019, was billed as "Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us", an attempt to "see them aliens".[88][89]Air Force spokeswoman Laura McAndrews said the government "would discourage anyone from trying to come into the area where we train American armed forces".[3]Two music festivals in rural Nevada, AlienStock and Storm Area 51 Basecamp, were subsequently organized to capitalize on the popularity of the original Facebook event. Between 1,500 and 3,000 people showed up at the festivals, while over 150 people made the journey over several miles of rough roads to get near the gates to Area 51.[90][91]Seven people were reportedly arrested at the event.[90]
In popular culture
Because of Area 51's prominence in relation to aliens and conspiracy theories, it has often been used as a setting and theme in popular culture, especially inscience fictionworks involving aliens.[92]
See also
Footnotes
Citations
- ^Cherif, Mohamed (30 May 2015).UFOs: Aliens or Extraterrestrials.TheBookEdition. p. 345.ISBN9789938052633.
- ^abc"KXTA"(PDF).Jeppesen.8 January 2021. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 31 July 2021.Retrieved31 August2021.
- ^abcBrice-Saddler, Michael (12 July 2019)."Half a million people signed up to storm Area 51. What happens if they actually show?".The Washington Post.Retrieved13 July2019.
- ^Rich & Janos 1994,p. 57.
- ^"Area 51 'declassified' in U-2 spy plane history".BBC News.16 August 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 15 October 2014.Retrieved25 September2014.
- ^Jacobsen 2012,pp. 11–15, 320–321.
- ^abcdLacitis, Erik (27 March 2010)."Area 51 vets break silence: Sorry, but no space aliens or UFOs".Seattle Times Newspaper.Archivedfrom the original on 20 June 2012.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^abJacobsen 2012,pp. 65–66, 77–80.
- ^abcdefPedlow, Gregory W.; Welzenbach, Donald E. (1992).The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954–1974.Washington DC: History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency.Archivedfrom the original on 18 August 2013.Retrieved17 August2013.
- ^Regenold, Stephen (13 April 2007)."Lonesome Highway to Another World?".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 17 June 2007.Retrieved8 July2007.
- ^"US Department of Energy. Nevada Operations Office.United States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992(December 2000) "(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 15 June 2010.Retrieved10 June2010.
- ^"Navigation map".ndep.nv.gov. Archived fromthe originalon 16 February 2008.Retrieved4 October2008.
- ^"Guide"(GIF).fas.org.Archivedfrom the original on 6 November 2015.Retrieved4 April2015.
- ^Farnham, Alan (15 August 2013)."Area 51, 25 Among Yucca Mountain's Nuclear Neighbors".abc News.Retrieved20 December2020.
- ^abLeiby, Richard (24 August 2017)."Government officially acknowledges existence of Area 51, but not the UFOs".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 7 August 2017.Retrieved16 July2019.
- ^ "Groom Lake".Geographic Names Information System.United States Geological Survey,United States Department of the Interior.Retrieved9 November2010.
- ^Merlin, Peter (16 October 2010)."DREAMLAND: Fifty Years of Secret Flight Testing in NevadaBy Peter W. Merlin".dreamlandresort.Retrieved7 January2021.
- ^Strickland, Jonathan."How Area 51 Works".How Stuff Work.Archivedfrom the original on 21 August 2013.Retrieved16 August2013.
- ^"Intelligence Officer's Bookshelf".CIA.gov.11 June 2013. Archived fromthe originalon 3 December 2013.Retrieved15 July2019.
- ^abcde"Overhead: Groom Lake – Area 51".Federation of American Scientists.Archivedfrom the original on 5 June 2013.Retrieved11 June2013.
- ^Helms, Richard(15 May 1967).""OXCART reconnaissance of North Vietnam", Memo to the Deputy Secretary of Defense from the office of CIA Director Richard Helms, 15 May 1967 ".FOIA.CIA.gov.Archived fromthe originalon 15 October 2012.Retrieved15 July2019.(the full declassified document ismirroredat Wikimedia Commons)
- ^Rich, Ben R;Janos, Leo (1994).Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed.Boston: Little, Brown. p.56.ISBN978-0-316-74300-6.
- ^99th Air Base Wing(17 June 2022).Nellis Air Force Base Instruction 11-250(PDF).Las Vegas:United States Air Force.p. 105.Archived(PDF)from the original on 16 July 2022.
{{cite book}}
:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^Nevada Test and Training Range(24 July 2020).Air Force Manual 13-212 Volume 1 ACC Supplement NTTR Addendum A(PDF).Las Vegas:United States Air Force.p. 16.Archived(PDF)from the original on 31 July 2022.Retrieved31 July2022.
- ^"Flight Planning / Aeronautical Charts".SkyVector.Archivedfrom the original on 3 December 2013.Retrieved11 June2013.
- ^Tingley, Joseph."Mineral resources of the pahranagat range 30' by 60' quadrangle"(PDF).University of Nevada-Reno. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 15 April 2012.Retrieved15 January2021.
- ^abc"Groom Mining District Collection 99-19".Knowledgecenter.unr.edu. Archived fromthe originalon 12 March 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^Mueller, Robert (1989).Active Air Force Bases Within the United States of America on 17 September 1982(PDF).Maxwell AFB, Alabama: Center for Air Force History, USAF.ISBN0-912799-53-6.Archived(PDF)from the original on 20 December 2016.Retrieved23 December2016.
- ^"WW2 Military Airfields including Auxiliaries and Support fields".Airfieldsdatabase. Archived fromthe originalon 8 June 2012.Retrieved10 June2012.
- ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxPeebles, Curtis (1999).Dark Eagles, Revised Edition.Novato, CA: Presidio Press.ISBN0-89141-696-X.
- ^abcPeebles, Curtis (2000).Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union.Novato, CA: Presidio Press. pp.141–144.ISBN978-0-89141-700-2.
- ^The U-2's Intended Successor: Project Oxcart, 1956–1968 (Report). October 1994.
- ^"Area 51's existence acknowledged by CIA in declassified documents".CBS News.16 August 2013.Retrieved27 November2020.
- ^"OSA History, chap. 20, pp. 39–40, 43, 51..." OXCART Story "pp. 7–9 (S) (cited by" The U-2's Intended Successor ")
- ^abcdMcIninch, Thomas P. (2 July 1996)."The Oxcart Story".CIA.gov.Archived fromthe originalon 4 October 2013.Retrieved15 July2019.
- ^"U-2 and SR-71 Units, Bases and Detachments".Ais.org. 1995.Archivedfrom the original on 7 May 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^abcdefgSteve Davies: "Red Eagles. America's Secret MiGs", Osprey Publishing, 2008
- ^Rosen, Benji (1 November 2013)."Israel loaned Soviet jets to US for testing in 1968".The Jerusalem Post.Retrieved22 December2022.
- ^"Area 51 Test Pilot Died During Heroic Su-27 Flight: Report".The Drive.7 May 2022.
- ^Rich & Janos 1994,pp. 56–60.
- ^abc"Info"(PDF).usafpatches.Archived(PDF)from the original on 6 November 2015.Retrieved6 September2011.
- ^"Area 51 Test Site".F-117A. 14 July 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 22 October 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^"4450th TG".F-117A. 1 April 2002.Archivedfrom the original on 22 October 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^"Tonopah Test Range (TTR)".F-117A. 14 July 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 22 October 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^abcd"JTF" Baja Scorpions "of Groom Lake".F-117A. 14 July 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 4 June 2012.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^Mary Motta (22 April 2000)."Images of Top-Secret U.S. Air Base Show Growth".space. Archived fromthe originalon 26 September 2001.
- ^Kevin Poulsen(25 May 2004)."Area 51 hackers dig up trouble".Securityfocus. Archived fromthe originalon 30 November 2012.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^"Janet Airline / EG&G / JT3".dreamlandresort.5 November 2020.Retrieved8 January2021.
- ^"Groom Mine, NV – N37.34583° W115.76583°".Topoquest.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^abcDay, Dwayne Allen (23 January 2023)."Not-so ancient astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident".The Space Review.Retrieved24 January2023.
- ^"State of Nevada Aeronautical Chart 2013-2014"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 25 April 2013.Retrieved11 June2013.
- ^nationalatlas.gov."Map of Federal lands in Nevada"(PDF).US Department of the Interior. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 10 September 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^"CIA acknowledges its mysterious Area 51 test site for first time".Reuters Archive. 17 August 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 17 August 2013.Retrieved17 August2013.
- ^"Area 51 officially acknowledged, mapped in newly released documents".CNN.Archivedfrom the original on 17 August 2013.Retrieved17 August2013.
- ^ab"High court won't review" state secrets "privilege in 'Area 51' case".RCFP.org. 16 November 1998.Retrieved31 December2020.
- ^"60 Minutes Transcript an Area 51".ufomind.17 March 1996.Retrieved31 December2020.
- ^Rogers, Keith (4 June 2002)."Federal judges to hear case involving Area 51".Las Vegas Review-Journal.Archived fromthe originalon 14 February 2010.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^"Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. Argued and Submitted June 14, 2002"(PDF).14 March 2012. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 14 March 2012.
- ^"2000 Presidential Determination".Archivedfrom the original on 4 June 2012.Retrieved10 June2010.
- ^"2002 Presidential Determination".Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 18 September 2002.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2011.Retrieved10 June2010.
- ^"2003 Presidential Determination".Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 16 September 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 10 May 2010.Retrieved10 June2010.
- ^"Warnings for emergency responders kept from Area 51 workers".Las Vegas Review-Journal.21 May 2006. Archived fromthe originalon 14 February 2010.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^abMarsh, Alton K. (10 January 2008)."Don't ask, don't tell: Area 51 gets airport identifier – Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association".Aopa.org. Archived fromthe originalon 12 May 2013.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^Webster, Donovan (26 June 1994)."Area 51".The New York Times.
- ^ab"Here's what we know about the 'Cammo Dudes' who patrol Area 51".nydailynews.Archivedfrom the original on 6 August 2018.Retrieved6 August2018.
- ^"Area 51 Camo Dudes: Lethal Force Authorized – Area 51".area51.org.9 January 2017.Archivedfrom the original on 6 August 2018.Retrieved6 August2018.
- ^Hearst Magazines (April 2000).Popular Mechanics.Hearst Magazines. pp. 142–.
- ^"Area 51 'hacker' charges dropped".theregister.co.uk.Archivedfrom the original on 6 August 2018.Retrieved6 August2018.
- ^abcDay, Dwayne A.(9 January 2006)."Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident".The Space Review(online).Archivedfrom the original on 16 March 2006.Retrieved2 April2006.
- ^Jacobsen 2012,p. xvi.
- ^"Presidential Determination No. 2003–39".Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 16 September 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 10 May 2010.Retrieved10 June2010.
- ^"CIA memo to DCI Colby"(PDF).Hosted by The Space Review.Archived(PDF)from the original on 26 March 2006.Retrieved2 April2006.
- ^Day, Dwayne A.(26 November 2007)."Secret Apollo".The Space Review (online).Archivedfrom the original on 12 July 2009.Retrieved16 February2009.
- ^Martin, Sean (16 July 2019)."Area 51 warning: Man shot dead for trying to enter military base".Express.Archivedfrom the original on 17 July 2019.Retrieved11 August2021.
- ^Shoro, Mike (28 January 2019)."Chase at Nevada National Security Site ends with man shot dead".Las Vegas Review-Journal.Archivedfrom the original on 29 January 2019.Retrieved11 August2021.
- ^Mahood, Tom (October 1996)."The Cheshire Airstrip".Archived fromthe originalon 16 March 2006.Retrieved2 April2006.
- ^Jacobsen 2012,pp. 204–208.
- ^abJacobsen, Annie (5 April 2009)."The Road to Area 51".Los Angeles Times.Archivedfrom the original on 21 January 2012.Retrieved10 June2013.
- ^Gulyas, Aaron (11 June 2015)."The Paranormal and the Paranoid: Conspiratorial Science Fiction Television".Rowman & Littlefield – via Google Books.
- ^Peebles, Curtis (12 December 1995)."Watch the Skies!: A Chronicle of the Flying Saucer Myth".Berkley Books – via Google Books.
- ^Clary, David A. (22 January 2001)."Before and After Roswell: The Flying Saucer in America, 1947-1999".Xlibris Corporation – via Google Books.
- ^Knapp, George(10 November 1989)."Bob Lazar describes alien technology housed at secret S-4 base in Nevada"(video).youtube.KLAS-TV.
- ^Dreamland,Transmedia and Dandelion Production for Sky Television (1996).
- ^Sheaffer, Robert (November–December 2004)."Tunguska 1, Roswell 0".Skeptical Inquirer.28(6). Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived fromthe originalon 13 March 2009.
- ^van Boom, Daniel (18 July 2019)."1.7 million want to raid Area 51 to 'see them aliens'".CNET News.Retrieved23 July2019.
- ^Matei, Adrienne (17 July 2019)."1.5 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong?".The Guardian.
- ^Griffin, Andrew (17 July 2019)."Storm Area 51: Are Alien-hunters Really Planning to 'Raid' the Secret U.S. Military Base?".The Independent.
- ^Matei, Adrienne (16 July 2019)."1.3 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong?".The Guardian.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved16 July2019.
- ^"Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us".m.facebook.Retrieved25 July2019.
- ^abRichwine, Lisa (20 September 2019)."Area 51 raid lures festive UFO hunters to Nevada desert; five arrested".Reuters.Retrieved22 September2019.
- ^Zialcita, Paolo (20 September 2019)."'Storm Area 51' Fails To Materialize ".NPR.Retrieved21 September2019.
- ^Ward, Alex (19 September 2019)."Area 51 and aliens: the myth, the meme, and the strange reality, explained".Vox.Retrieved20 February2024.
Sources
- Darlington, David (1998).Area 51: The Dreamland Chronicles.New York: Henry Holt.ISBN978-0-8050-6040-9
- Jacobsen, Annie(2012) [2011].Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Military Base.New York: Back Bay Books.ISBN978-0-316-13294-7.
- Patton, Phil (1998).Dreamland: Travels Inside the Secret World of Roswell and Area 51.New York: Villard/Random HouseISBN978-0-375-75385-5
- Rich, Ben R.;Janos, Leo (1994).Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed.Boston: Little, Brown.ISBN978-0-316-74300-6.
- Stahl, Lesley"Area 51 / Catch 22"60 MinutesCBS Television17 March 1996, a US TV news magazine's segment about the environmental lawsuit.
External links
- Media related toArea 51at Wikimedia Commons
- Las Vegas sectional aeronautical chart, centered on Groom Lake(Federal Aviation Administration – SkyVector )